Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Missing: Minorities in Media

By Laura S. Washington, In These Times. Posted February 26, 2008.


In the wake of racial upheaval, the 1968 "Riot Report" concluded the media had to improve its coverage of Black America. Has it?
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

America was burning. The riots unleashed by the April 4, 1968 assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. were terrorizing cities across the nation.

Chicago was no exception. Warner Saunders got a desperate call from WLS-TV, the local ABC affiliate. They needed blacks on the air, and they needed them now. So Saunders, who was a community activist and executive director of Chicago's Better Boys Foundation, signed up as co-host of a hastily arranged television special, "For Blacks Only."

The special, which aired in 1968, snared such high ratings that the station gave it a regular slot and kept it going for 10 years. Saunders eventually became a full-time reporter. Today he's the top news anchor at Chicago's NBC station.

Saunders' foray into TV news came weeks after President Lyndon B. Johnson's Kerner Commission report declared, "Our nation is moving toward two societies, one black, one white -- separate and unequal."

The report, also known as "The Riot Report," released 40 years ago this month, was a response to the urban riots of the late '60s. Blacks, outraged over poverty and racism, took to the streets and shook up America's powers that be.

The commission produced an exhaustive look at media coverage of communities of color and responded with a key recommendation: if the United States hoped to cool down the searing anger in its inner cities across the nation, it must do a better job of covering African-Americans.

The report's authors slammed the media, writing, "the journalistic profession has been shockingly backward in seeking out, hiring, training and promoting Negroes."

Four decades later, there has been undeniable progress. Our cities are no longer burning. Yet in many ways, we are running on ice.

Following '68, news organizations scrambled to find black faces and connections. For a while, they were actually plucking talented African-Americans off the streets.

In 1978, the American Society of Newspaper Editors (ASNE) set a goal to have journalists reach parity with their proportion of the population within 25 years.

We are still waiting on the ASNE vow.

In 2007, the percent of blacks, Latinos, Asians and Native Americans working in America's daily newsrooms stood at 13.62 percent, a slight decline over the previous year, according to ASNE's annual newsroom census. Those groups represent 33 percent of the nation's population.

The numbers are not much better on the broadcast side. Local TV news shows boast about the rainbow of faces featured on the 10 o'clock news. But the real power lies with the news managers and producers who pick the stories and steer the coverage. That's the "if it bleeds, it leads" coverage that passes for real reporting. Crime victims, welfare mothers and child abusers are the stars of those shows. The public housing resident with the rag on her head, the gang-banger slouching out his signs. It's a sensational and only small slice of African-American life today.

The decision-makers don't know any better. Most of them don't live in those communities and they probably don't know too many of the people who do.

Meanwhile, journalists of color are leaving the media -- voluntarily and otherwise -- in droves. Some have collided with the glass ceiling. Others are being pushed out by the massive changes in the media's economy.

Ironically, at a time when the nation is on the cusp of electing its first black president, the press corps assigned to dissect the presidential race remains overwhelmingly white.

Every few years we get a "moment" when America wakes up to our long-festering racial divide -- the '60s riots, the rebellion in South Central L.A., the Tawana Brawley debacle, the O.J. Simpson saga, Hurricane Katrina.

With each moment comes new promises to bring more people of color into the media discourse.

Last year, PBS host and correspondent Gwen Ifill was suddenly getting more airtime as an analyst on the major networks, like at her alma mater, NBC News. It should be because of her experience covering politics, her deep intellect and plainspoken charm. It's more likely because she took on Don "Nappy Head" Imus in the New York Times.

The Barack Obama Hope Machine promises us a new kind of racial moment in America. Let's hope it's an opportunity for lasting progress on the media diversity front as well.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: media, news, african-americans, minorities

Laura S. Washington, an In These Times senior editor, teaches journalism at DePaul University and is a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Every few years we get a "moment"
Posted by: rickiey on Feb 26, 2008 3:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every few years we get a "moment" when America wakes up to our long-festering racial divide -- the '60s riots, the rebellion in South Central L.A., the Tawana Brawley debacle, the O.J. Simpson saga, Hurricane Katrina

You forgot to mention the Duke lacrosse rapists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New Kind of Racial Moment
Posted by: no1kstate on Feb 26, 2008 9:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have a long way yet to go. Most people agree in principle with the idea of equality, but we've yet to see its fruition. Maybe, like you say, this'll be a new kind of racial moment. Maybe the views and experiences of minorities will not continue to be marginalized, and the country will discover not all of us blacks like in the "ghetto."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

crap article
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Feb 27, 2008 4:03 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the start was promising but in the end you get the 'deep' analysis of the writer with victim-spew of lines like this:

"Last year, PBS host and correspondent Gwen Ifill was suddenly getting more airtime as an analyst on the major networks, like at her alma mater, NBC News. It should be because of her experience covering politics, her deep intellect and plainspoken charm. It's more likely because she took on Don "Nappy Head" Imus in the New York Times."

do your research. make a real point. there isn't any real analysis, no real facts, examples that would lead one to agree with the premise of the article at all.

this seems to be either a short version of a longer article or a poor attempt at meeting a deadline.

you malign Gwen Ifill, a very knowledgeable and wonderful reporter by your cheap, easy comment. this is hack journalism at best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: crap article Posted by: billwald
» RE: crap article Posted by: no1kstate
Wanna Talk Media???
Posted by: Kym525 on Feb 28, 2008 11:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has anyone seen the new network television line-ups? Can we say "lily-white"? I'm still looking for a GOOD multi-ethnic show that features talented actors of ALL races interacting positively (and I don't mean The Wire or Law and Order).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Completely Agree
Posted by: Nick747 on Mar 1, 2008 9:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There needs to be a change in the diversity of the media. The viewers need to be able to relate to these people and get a point of view from those who socially and culturally understand them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Media? Least of problems
Posted by: ArtemInox on Mar 4, 2008 10:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I forget where I found this, pretty sure it was on Alternet. Google the text if you care that much...

"It starts with resumes, before anyone even sees anyone else's face. In 2004, researchers at the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business sent close to 5,000 fictitious resumes in response to help-wanted ads in Boston and Chicago newspapers. They randomly assigned very white-sounding names (such as Emily Walsh or Greg Baker) to half of the resumes, while using African-American sounding names (such as Lakisha Washington or Jamal Jones) on the other half. The results? White names received 50 percent more callbacks for interviews, regardless of occupation, industry and employer size."

Need I quote more? Forget about more color in media, there are still much more serious fundamental issues with race in this country.

http://www.addictedtoaggravation.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fade to Black
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Mar 5, 2008 10:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Psst: want to get a job in the media? All you have to do is submit a resume, subject to a drug test, pass a lenghty background check, work for a ridiculously low wage; and believe it or not, be White.
I know for a fact that there are fewer and fewer Blacks and other minorites in print journalism. I see applicants come and go at the newspaper where I work and in the last seven years we haven't hired a single Black reporter or editor. There are only two of us in the entire editorial department.
This affects the way Blacks are covered in Los Angeles. We're often persona non gratas in L.A. unless we're the perpretrators of crime, athletics or some other variable of civil disobedience.
The word is out on the streets-and in journalism schools: where will all the talented minority writers go to get a job? J-schools continue to graduate students, but as in professional sports, there are only a limited number of openings. Well, there's PR.
Newspapers are undergoing a tectonic shift as papers trim staff amid declining readership and soaring ad costs. And advertisers will pay only if their ad reaches its intended audience, which may exclude residents of the ghetto or barrio who can't afford to shop at Neiman Marcus.
This blackout of minorities in the media is an example of what gets covered and what doesn't. It's been a decades-long dilemma in American journalism and we see the proof in the Obama story in all of its viciousness. Imagine if he shot up a school, a la Virgnia Tech.
Black newspapers rarely get read outside its immediate coverage area. The Sentinel doesn't make it outside of Los Angeles. But it does serve a need.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]