Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Where Are All the Girl Ninjas? Sexist Stereotypes Pervade Children's Media

By Sara Voorhees, Women's Media Center. Posted February 22, 2008.


Females characters are sexualized, put down, or just plain absent in the shows your kids are watching.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Geena Davis (pictured at right) was watching preschool TV shows and children's videos with her two-year-old daughter when she began to wonder: where were the girls? Where were the animated girl mice, the girl ninjas, the girl puppy dogs? Boy rodents, canines and martial artists seemed to dominate every frame and animated cell, but only an occasional female came popping in for comic or gratuitous effect.

For an actress who had galvanized women with Thelma and Louise and A League of their Own, and was soon to change the course of television history as the first female president of the United States (Commander in Chief), "Where are the girls?" was a question that needed to be answered.

"I mentioned it to a studio head whose movies were largely family fare," Davis told me in Los Angeles. "I said, 'Have you ever noticed that in kids' programs there are fewer female characters than male?' and he said, 'No no, not US! We're all over this issue!'"

"What he meant," Davis said, "was this: 'We have ONE female in our movie; we make sure we have one female that everyone can approve of.' I realized then that if we were going to address this question seriously, we needed facts. We needed data."

So Davis set out to get them. She started her own non-profit, and over the course of the next three years, with the help of USC Annenberg School of Journalism professor Stacy Smith, Davis began research to assess portrayals of males and females in children's media. On January 30 and 31, 2008, at the University of Southern California, under the auspices of the Geena Davis Institute on Gender and Children in the Media (GDIDM) she presented the findings at a forum for studio heads, writers, educators and students.

Stacy Smith, who introduced the data at the forum, summed up the Geena Davis Institute's results in three succinct points:

  • Gender imbalance reigns across the media.
  • System wide, when females are presented they are shown in a hypersexualized way.
  • The highest concentration of this imbalance is in animated films and G-rated programming, where parents might assume their children are safest.

The general sense of Smith's first two points is not new or shocking information, at least to regular media consumers, but the statistics are hard to ignore. Examining 15,000 individual speaking characters across the rating spectrum of G-, PG-, PG-13, and R-rated films, Smith and the GDIDM discovered that males outnumber females nearly 3 to 1 in movies; male narrators outnumber female narrators 4 to 1 (83% to 17%).

Studying 4,000 female film characters, females (from animated girl puppies to grown human women) were more than 5 times more likely than males to be shown as adornment or sexually enticing and three times more likely to be dressed in sexually alluring clothing.

When females appear in G and PG films, they are more likely to have traditionally motivated behaviors: they are more likely than males to be depicted in a committed relationship (59.9% vs. 47.4%), and with an inclination to romance as the main or exclusive personality trait.

Most dramatically, females of all ages were 3 times more likely (10.6% vs. 3.4%) to have unrealistically "perfect" bodies, introducing the skinny ideal at an early age to the minds of young boys and girls. In her address to studio heads on the first day of the forum, Amy Pascal, co-chair of Sony Pictures Entertainment, pointed out that most animated female characters have such anatomically impossible bodies "they have no room for a womb."

The forum also included four panel discussions: a group of entertainment business professionals considering the marketing of children's toys and products; an International panel discussing kids' TV around the world; a TV and movie critics' panel to discuss their perceptions and incidences of Smith's research, and an education and resource panel about possible ways to create a cultural shift toward gender parity in the media.

The good news was that although they are still less prevalent, when they do appear in movies and television, girls and women are becoming stronger and more heroic: fewer "hookers, victims and doormats," in the phrase used by forum participants.

When I asked Stacy Smith about the two films nominated for best picture (Atonement and Juno) whose main characters are strong young girls in command of their own destinies, and whether they signal a trend toward gender parity, she said she'll be more optimistic if the trend continues for several years.

"We should all applaud these types of multi-dimensional and complicated roles for girls," she said, because box office and commercial sales are a primary motivator for all programming decisions. "Buy tickets and DVDs that feature them. Give the entertainment industry freedom to take risks without fear that no one will pay to see them."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gender, media, sexism, representations, media activism

Sara Voorhees has been a film critic for 27 years. She was nationally syndicated on television by Conus Communications and from 1990 to 2001 wrote for the Scripps Howard syndicate. She is the membership director of the Broadcast Film Critics Association and serves on the board of the Action Coalition for Media Education.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
what?
Posted by: leta on Feb 22, 2008 1:16 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how do you know they aren't female? do they have to act in a stereotypically feminine fashion for you to perceive them as female?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: what? Posted by: meeper
Au contraire
Posted by: Kevbo on Feb 22, 2008 2:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If a ninja is doing their job properly, then it matters not if the ninja is female since we can't detect them. Such is way of ninja!

Does the gender of a ninja matter when they're flipping out and killing people? I think not.

As for pirates I submit to you the film fiasco of one Geena Davis known as "Cutthroat Island". I believe that film may have sapped any girl's interest in piracy and swashbuckling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Au contraire Posted by: newtype_alpha
How about.....
Posted by: felipe on Feb 22, 2008 3:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
taking responsibility for raising our daughters to be strong without counting on the media to do it for us.

We (wife & I) make an effort to ensure our 4 year old daughter has positive female role models and influences. That includes her seeing a woman Dr. and attending taekwondo program ran by 3 wonderful women, among other things. Her favorite musical artist is Regina Spektor, not Hannah Montana. That crap is not even allowed in our house and she has idea who HM is. No Wiggles either. Age is no excuse for horrible taste. (She loves Klaus Nomi too, weird I know).

Other things we don't allow include Bratz dolls (Slutz as we call them) or any of the Disney Princess as a lifestyle junk. Groovy girls are appropriate dolls and if she wants to play dress up we have fairy costumes.

The point is that as parents we have to make choices in what our children 'consume'. Sure it takes work to dig through the crap to find media and toys that we find acceptable.

Unfortunately too many parents can't be bothered so they park the kid(s) in front of the TV, most likely set to the Disney channel, to eat a Happy Meal while they play with some p.o.s. toy they bought without thinking at Wally World. Then they blame the media, the schools and everybody else when their kid turns out all f'ed up. It's much easier than doing the work than to take responsibility for ones own actions.

Final note, no we're not perfect, we mess up on a regular basis. All parents do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How about..... Posted by: bichomau
» RE: How about..... Posted by: felipe
» RE: How about..... Posted by: Badger1492
» Did you ever think... Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Did you ever think... Posted by: felipe
» Hmmm Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: How about..... Posted by: SalB
» RE: How about..... Posted by: felipe
» RE: How about..... Posted by: SalB
» RE: How about..... Posted by: felipe
Fantasy and reality
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Feb 22, 2008 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who does Geena Davis think she is?

Maybe little girls like movies about pretty little princesses who get rescued by handsome princes, and male mice that scurry around making pretty dresses for them. Has her "Institute" bothered to ask them?

I mean, do women who read romance novels expect all men in the real world to have bad accents, play guitar outside their window all night, and pick them up for their date on a white horse? Perhaps some, but I think most read that stuff because it's fantasy. Should they start writing romance novels with guys who are kind of boring and geeky, but who have a steady job and are a good father to the children? Maybe, but that should be left to the writer and the consumer, don't you think?

I say, stop letting tall actresses meddle in children's entertainment like some sort of right-wing religious group, and ask the kids what they'd like to see. Right, kids?

If she wants to make a difference, why doesn't she open a technical college or a ninja academy for girls or something, so that girls in the real world who do lean toward traditionally "male" occupations or roles have a place to go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fantasy and reality Posted by: meeper
» RE: Fantasy and reality Posted by: meeper
» RE: Fantasy and reality Posted by: bornxeyed
» Sorry for the typos. Posted by: bornxeyed
Exactly
Posted by: mbruton on Feb 22, 2008 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it's that important then get a degree in animation or maybe film production - or get off the pot.

If more women enter these and other related fields then more women can get in there and write/produce/animate subjects and themes from their own perspective. They tell writers to write what they know, men know society and the world from a male perspective. Is it such a great surprise or a conspiracy if it shows?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xactly Posted by: rickiey
Funny
Posted by: Logic's Edge on Feb 22, 2008 6:05 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
every cartoon I've seen lately seems to involve female heroines (and villains) kicking the butts of ineffectual males and helped by ineffectual male sidekicks.

- Kimpossible
- some cartoon where there are three heroines in three different colors of jumpsuits
- some cartoon where there is one tiny heroine with huge eyes
- some school cartoon where the chief character is a ball-busting matron

plus a bunch of others.

The message is always the same in these:
- women hold the moral upper hand
- women are competent, men are not
- women can easily kick the butts of men around them

I can't think of a single current cartoon where a male character isn't a screwup. Futurama, The Simpsons, Tripping the Rift... it's all the same.

This is what is being poured into little heads. Congratulations, feminists, you've clearly won your fight to program little boys to think that they are valueless in modern society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You obviously haven't been watching the cartoons
Posted by: rickiey on Feb 22, 2008 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a reason that very few of the cartoon characters are female, and the author of this piece is that reason.

Most cartoon characters, are shown to be, in some form or another, a type of bumbling idiot. Yes, even the ninjas.

When you have a male character, you can make him as stupid, bumbling, clueless and flawed as you want. Creativity is your only limit.

Do the same to a female character, and the retaliation is fierce.

Take the Simpsons, for example (Since it is the longest running, must popular cartoon): Homer has become a symbol for stupidity. Marge? The symbol for an obviously superior intellect saddled with a moron. Bart, a malicious and yet strangely popular kid. Lisa? Much more intelligent, of course.

It isn't relegated to just cartoons, either. Have you noticed that almost all family sitcoms have the same characters?

Dad-Overbearing, clueless, thoughtless inconsiderate unattractive bumbling idiot.
Mom-Patient, caring, thoughtful, attractive, intelligent woman.(Roseanne was the exception that proves there is a rule)

Since only majorly flawed cartoon characters are considered funny, the kid gloves that networks must treat females with, exclude them from being cartoons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Money/mouth Posted by: suprmark
Let our kids judge how much violence they need? PHOOEY!
Posted by: GarrisonPayneLeonard38H on Feb 22, 2008 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Underlying Geena's issue -- a perfectly legitimate criticism -- is the fact that we teach every TV-addicted child, male and female, to act instead of think, to lash out instead of reach out, to take the superficial that is pushed instead of delving into dimensions and subtexts.

Yeah, sure, "that's all they'll watch". If such is true at all, it is because we raise our kids in an environment of hyper-stimulation:
1. Broadcast media pelts them with hyper-caffeinated advertisements and excruciatingly noisy 'toons.
2. Music pounds them with The Beat to the point they can't listen to anything that is not percussive. (Aside from this, listen to them speak: Through the the third decade, far too many kids speak in monotone. They have no internal music, and no deep sense of language.)
3. Toys and games reward hand-eye co-ordination at the expense of intellect-imagination development. A singular failure in this regard is the recent crop of boob-tube-babysitter DVDs
4. Our educational system, falling prey to Con ideology, continues to sacrifice art, music, and genuine physical education classes in favor of rote-learned lessons and gladiatorial sports.

Geena has part of the issue right, but nothing will resolve this problem better than book-loving parents and teachers transmitting that love of reading to their children, while shutting off all the electronic babysitters. Only then might we begin to regain competitiveness in research sciences, advanced math, and other fields where America is no longer a first-tier contributor.

What say? You are too busy "providing for them" to read to them, challenge them, and save them from the boob tube? Well then, plan on spending a chunk of what you "provide" on Ritalin and/or Prozac, because you are probably raising another Pharma Customer...a child who truly won't care whether there was a "girl ninja" or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What the hell kinda question is that?
Posted by: newtype_alpha on Feb 22, 2008 9:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where are all the girl ninjas? The girl mice? The girl puppydogs.

If you haven't been living in a cage for the last twenty frickin years you can find them here, here and possibly, here. If that wasn't enough, it's at least enough to know that, according to my six year old daughter, Danny Phantom apparently has a female clone who has all the same powers he has except that "sometimes, she melts." I haven't seen the episode, but so far it's looking like female characters roughly tie the males on that show.

And that's just for starters. On the R-rated front, we also have our Girl Messiah (who in fact begins her cinematic life, not as a lovestruck sex object, but as a complete and utter dork) in addition to hard-nosed Girl Astronauts, followed thereafter by Girl Marines.

And those aren't even RECENT trends. Try the various female leads in TV Dramas; CSI, Law and Order, 24, etc. Try the leads from this endless slew of romantic comedies which (with one notable exception) generally portray the female portion of the cast as being relatively stable and deliberate while their male counterparts blunder their way into and/or out of meaningful relationships. We're now several episodes into our SECOND incredibly scary female Terminator, which is all just as well since this is only about the sixth time since Bridget Fonda that we've had a major motion picture or TV production about a-chick-who-could-probably-kick-your-ass.

Yet any attempt to display women in any role that acknowledges the fact that they ARE women somehow gets blasted by an elite clique of other women for... well, the reasons vary, but it usually has something to do with messages. Why does this keep happening? Is it it feminism? Is it anti-feminism? Is it post-modern crypto-feminism trying to come to terms with itself? Is there a compelling and realistic way to cast a female character that won't piss off the moral crusaders, or do we just have to go on pretending that women and men talk, act, dress, think and feel exactly alike?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nonsexist toy for your daughter
Posted by: DeeOhGee on Feb 22, 2008 9:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hello Kitty

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Supergirl comics
Posted by: Crazy H on Feb 22, 2008 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember Supergirl? Wonder Woman? Bat girl? The Bionic Woman? The Girl From U.N.C.L.E.?

Kicking butt, taking names, and never, ever, selling as many comics as their male counterparts.

Princesses simply sell better than super-heroines. Believe me, if female ninjas sold better Hollywood would be turning out female ninjas just as fast as the other crap.

But don't blame them. From my strictly non-scientific survey, mommies are more likely to encourage daughters to play dress-up than cowboys-and-indians; and more likely to buy her dollies than guns; more likely to encourage her to build concensus than to 'stand up for yourself.'

I'm not trying to say whether it's nature or nurture, just paying attention to the facts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Girl Ninjas are on G4TV's Ninja Warrior
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Feb 22, 2008 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They don't air those episodes all the time but they are having a marathon in early March.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well
Posted by: vangogh69 on Feb 22, 2008 11:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author of this piece is presumably limiting her critique to US children's animation because if we are discussing animation on the whole (with Japanese anime in particular), there is a strong tradition of female heroines/ass-kickers/ninjas/etc. who (as is the norm) are more competent and together than the males. That said, I would say the problem is more one of socialization in regards to gender norms than lack-of representations (i.e. when boys are encouraged to cook and girls to play war, then we'll have some changes).

(The "Golden Age" of female heroism in US entertainment (tv, film, video, etc.) would be the 1980's, which gave the world the wonderful Lt. Ripley AND Sara Conner.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FEMINISM ?
Posted by: Tahlavi on Feb 22, 2008 11:46 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
she wants violent role models for little girls? That's feminism?? something's wrong with this picture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FEMINISM ? Posted by: Axiom69
Female Action Heroes
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Feb 22, 2008 12:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The new Fox Terminator spinoff, The Sarah Connor Chronicles, seems popular and has not one but TWO female leads who both kick ass. The male character, being younger, has more of a supporting role.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Simply Untrue
Posted by: dumdumboy on Feb 22, 2008 1:56 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jenny, the female robot from "My Life As A Teenage Robot" kicks butt every episode, as does Kim Possible. As far as ninjas are concerned, the little girl on the Jackie Chan show is something of a ninja-in-training, as is the female half on the Ying Yang Yo show. And who can ever forget the Powerpuff Girls?

The whole premise of this piece is untrue. Note to author: next time, do some research.

-From the father of a seven-year-old boy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ditto for the corporate world (stiil!)
Posted by: Blue Heron on Feb 22, 2008 2:42 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take Apple for example, with a ratio of 9 males to every female. That's progress for ya! Looks like antisocial white frat boys and geeky automatons are gonna be running things for some time to come. Makes their products seem considerably less friendly or 'cool' now I think about it. It's not as if there's a dirth of women engineers out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's the culture, stupid Posted by: SalB
» Thank you all... Posted by: Blue Heron
» RE: It's the culture, stupid Posted by: Blue Heron
Even if they're stupid, there need to be more female main characters
Posted by: SalB on Feb 22, 2008 11:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So many main characters, even if bumbling idiots, are there because they are supposed to be the one the audience relates to. If those characters are never female (and they rarely are, or those that are are so perfect as to be impossible), we never really relate to a female character. We get the feeling that the female is "the other" or abnormal, even if we are female. Regardless of the portrayal, if the main characters are always male, rather than just half of the time, then the media will remain sexist.

And from now on, when a new clever movie comes out starring a guy, I will consider it cliched. If writers really want to be creative, they need to start writing about women in a recognizable, flawed way, i.e. the way we really are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Old men and the feminine
Posted by: davy on Feb 23, 2008 1:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yea Geena. Let the dogs bark cause they certainly do, BUT nothing is more important than the feminine taking it's rightful place. Naturally if the "old Men" are to keep control they had better damp down the woman, cause women know that ALL women love their children and this is hard to sell war with.
From a young man in an old mans body. :-) Only KINDNESS will work !!!! TRUTH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kicking Butt, Kicking Butt, Kicking Butt...Anyone for Bread and Circuses?
Posted by: GarrisonPayneLeonard38H on Feb 23, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see that a large number of posts still hew to the belief that a character must "kick butt" to be strong.

Folks, those are CARTOON values...or Bushite values, which is essentially the same thing.

Victims of cartoon violence don't die. You don't get splattered with their blood. The victim isn't a friend, family member, or military buddy. No one bashed over the head has double vision and short-term memory loss.

All this cartoon violence is so utterly removed from consequence -- even as the violence is offered as a solution to a problem -- that it teaches children casual brutishness. It allows the Reptile and Mammalian brain fractions to "learn" that responding with violence carries no personal price tag, but instead is actually fun, invigorating, and heroic. Is this not another example of the new American anti-intellectualism?

Time to teach our kids that thinking and talking, not kicking, provide the tools for civilization. As progressives, we need to recognize that violent fantasies are a Con specialty: We should not grease their way to spreading this rot by indoctrinating children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you all...
Posted by: Blue Heron on Feb 23, 2008 10:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for contributing to my smear campaign! Wonderful! The more posts I get, whether positive or negative, the better! Thank you for being the perfect bait/ pawns ;0)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank you all... Posted by: Logic's Edge
Precious
Posted by: YogiBear on Feb 24, 2008 12:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anybody ever notice how the girl ninjas never break a nail or get their hair mussed up? It soooo precious!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

defshepard
Posted by: aurora545 on Feb 24, 2008 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AS a male who has watched way to much television. I have witnessed the male of the species portrayed as a clueless, stupid bumbler, that constantly needs to be helped or guided by the wise all-knowing female. I have seen in cartoons and commercials and regular adult programs this same portayal. The femminst have been very successful and outright sexist in their attack on masculinity. One more reason why I now watch less and less TV.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Girls will be girls
Posted by: gbalternet on Feb 29, 2008 4:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can't turn little girls into boys...yes some will get tomboyish, but... I tried real hard to turn my two into tomboys..outside of the US without TV or cartoons..and no matter that I only gave them cars and ffotballs to play with, they were still turned into dolls with sashes wrapped around them, or sent to school in family games, daddy and mommy car like.

Geena, Just turn off the tv if you don't like the ninjas..most of them little girls in question probably aren't watching ninja turtles anyway...they're probably onto word girl instead...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]