Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Rush Limbaugh Is Trying to Tear the GOP Apart

By Eric Boehlert, Media Matters for America. Posted February 15, 2008.


Hey, GOP, that's quite a Noise Machine you've constructed. Now good luck trying to dismantle it.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg


Rush Limbaugh, the marauding Frankenstein's monster of the Republican Party, is on the loose again, causing all kinds of political damage with his signature off-balance swings. But as has become his custom recently, the pain from Limbaugh's rampage is being felt by his creators -- his enablers -- inside the GOP.



Limbaugh and the rest of his get-John McCain brain trust -- Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Michelle Malkin, and campus instigator Ann Coulter -- have been tripping over themselves to get in front of a microphone (preferably a television one) to denounce the Republican Party's presumptive nominee and to suggest that perhaps conservatives should even vote Democratic come November.



After years of watching Limbaugh and his various band of midnight riders within the Republican Noise Machine launch countless, hateful crusades against liberals and Democrats, it's extraordinarily satisfying to watch the Republican Party leadership discover what it feels like when Limbaugh sets his venomous, factually challenged sights on their own front-runner.



For progressives, the sprawling GOP brawl is what blogger TRex would call a schadenfreude sundae. What could be more enjoyable than watching McCain get bogged down in the far-right swamp? Answer: Watching a handful of right-wing pundits come to the belated conclusion that Limbaugh is a dunce. Or, as one Weekly Standard blogger put it last week, the Limbaugh-led response to McCain was "unhinged -- and at times spectacularly disgraceful." And Dinesh D'Souza concluded, that, yes, Limbaugh is an "egomaniac" who "has grown accustomed to conservative bigwigs worshiping at the Shrine of Rush." (Truth is, Limbaugh's not that well liked among Republicans.)



Really? Limbaugh is spreading misinformation? He's wallowing in demagoguery while bordering on megalomania? He and his pals appear to be far more interested in the number of media mentions they rack up than they do in advancing the conservative movement? Ah, what a tangled web the GOP weaves. Wonder how McCain and the Republican Party minions enjoy following behind Limbaugh's broadcast each weekday with a bucket and shovel, cleaning up the mess spread all over the floor. Enjoy!



But this is what Republicans created. They wanted Limbaugh to be an attack dog and to chew up and spit out his/the party's opponents. They wanted him to label Democrats as traitors ("What's good for Al Qaeda is good for the Democratic Party in this country today"), to label them abhorrent and mentally deranged. They wanted Limbaugh to ignore any semblance of decency when demonizing the other side. Indeed, there has been virtually no offensive line that Limbaugh has crossed that Republicans have not dutifully justified or explained away.



Even last year when Limbaugh denigrated members of the U.S. armed forces, calling military men and women who criticized the war in Iraq and advocated withdrawal "phony soldiers," what did the GOP do? It rushed to Limbaugh's defense.



The pats on the back came from presidential contender Fred Thompson and Senate Republican Conference chairman Jon Kyl (AZ), and House Minority Leader John Boehner (OH) as well as his No. 2, Roy Blunt (MO), along with fellow Reps. Mike Pence (IN), Scott Garrett (NJ). Mean Rep. Marsha Blackburn (TN) supported legislation that commended Limbaugh following his "phony soldiers" crack. Rep. Eric Cantor (VA) even unveiled a Stand With Rush e-petition, urging "conservatives around the country" to fight for Limbaugh.



Oh, and let's not forget Mitt Romney's reaction to the "phony soldiers" controversy, which was priceless. (Romney was the candidate Limbaugh championed as the one true conservative in this year's Republican race.) Romney flip-flopped! Here he is momentarily chastising Limbaugh's comments. And here Romney is, just days later, as he "rushes to the defense of Rush Limbaugh." (And Republicans used to claim that candidate Al Gore had no moral compass?)



Meanwhile, it really was rather sad to watch former Sen. Bob Dole last week write a letter to Limbaugh trying to reason with the talk-show host about whether candidate McCain was sufficiently conservative. Or when McCain himself suggested that the talk show hosts simply "calm down." Or when Bud McFarlane, former national security adviser to President Reagan, took to the pages of The Wall Street Journal over the weekend to urge Rush and his angry pack to "be rational."



Rational? Where have these Republicans been for the last decade? The Noise Machine doesn't do rational. Was Limbaugh being "rational" when he toasted photos of the prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib as "good old American pornography"? Was Malkin being rational last year when she attempted to Swift Boat a traumatically injured 12-year-old boy? Was Coulter being rational … well, ever?



Sorry, GOP grown-ups. If there's one thing the Republican Noise Machine is allergic to, it's reason. And decency, and respect, and rational behavior.



And besides, why is it left to retired Republican graybeards like Dole and McFarlane to try to broker peace with the Limbaugh crowd? McCain, the party's presumptive nominee, is being savaged by a corral of radio talk-show hosts every day, and yet the silence among Republican elected officials has been deafening. Why? Because they're too afraid to stick up for their own candidate, too afraid Limbaugh and his wannabes will try burn somebody else at the stake.



I don't think progressives could have choreographed a better media meltdown if we tried.



Fact is, every time Limbaugh causes a controversy these days, the Democratic Party's political fortunes rise just a little bit -- like when he's treating McCain like a bum, or degrading phony soldiers, or mocking actor Michael J. Fox for allegedly faking the symptoms of his crippling Parkinson's disease while appearing in a Democratic-sponsored campaign ad.



What's so spectacular for the home team is that Limbaugh's crusade to demolish McCain stems from the radical right's fervent desire to cleanse the Republican Party of those who are deemed to be insufficiently pure in their conservative beliefs. And it's not just the candidates. Limbaugh has been clear that his deep disdain for McCain is driven by the fact that he might attract voters in the fall -- the wrong voters -- who do not adhere to the radical right's litmus test of right and wrong.



What Limbaugh and company are doing with their diatribes is launching political correctness into the stratosphere, and in the process herding voters toward the Democratic camp.



The best part? The whole crusade has been a colossal flop. On the eve of the Super Tuesday primary, lots of cogs in the Republican Noise Machine demanded that their readers and listeners embrace Mitt Romney.



Instead, McCain and Mike Huckabee -- the other GOP candidate deemed totally unworthy by the mighty Limbaugh -- pretty much ran the table and shoved the anointed one, Romney, right out of the race. I'd suggest the stunning failure to move the needle even an inch among self-identified Republican voters represented a nice punctuation point on the Republican Noise Machine's collapse, which, naturally, has closely mirrored President Bush's downward spiral. (The same post-Bush tremors are being felt at Fox News; read about their ratings woes here.)



Why did the get-McCain gambit fail so miserably? Maybe Republican voters saw through the transparent attacks. After all, Limbaugh himself wrote a column for The Wall Street Journal during the 2004 presidential campaign in which he commended McCain for being among the "unabashed and unashamed advocates of conservative principles and policies" in his speech at the Republican convention.



And if Limbaugh's uncontrollable disdain for McCain is based on that candidate's allegedly leftward drift on the issues, then why didn't Limbaugh try to run Rudy Giuliani out of the race? (Not that Rudy needed any help.) Giuliani's history of supporting abortion rights, embryonic stem-cell research, and gay rights makes McCain look like Ronald Reagan's long-lost brother.



And I'm sorry, but Romney
as the conservative true believer? Baystaters must have spit up their Summer Shack clam chowder when they heard that line. In a manic attempt to veer right for his White House run, Romney flip-flopped on a buffet of supposedly core Republican issues, such as immigration reform, abortion, gun control, tax cuts, and gay rights. (Go here to watch Romney perform one of the purest flip-flops ever captured on tape.)



More likely, Limbaugh is just wildly out of touch with the Republican Party. During President Bush's radical pro-war tenure, the right-wing talkers and bloggers convinced themselves they represented the mainstream -- the majority -- of the GOP. But they don't. They represent the radical CPAC wing of the GOP. And it's a shrinking minority.



I just hope the McCain Crazies keep it up. Their unhinged efforts perfectly capture the state of today's conservative movement. For instance, at one point when Limbaugh was ranting against the Arizona senator on his radio show, a caller asked whether he thought McCain would pick Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) as his running mate. Limbaugh sniffed that "Lindsey Graham is certainly close enough to [McCain] to die of anal poisoning."



A Limbaugh pal told the New York Daily News that the host was simply "using a time-honored synonym for 'brown-nosing.' " But as the paper reported, "[I]f you Google the term, the only people who seem to be using it are proprietors of porn sites. "



And then there was Laura Ingraham, the oxymoronic thinking person's right-wing radio host, who became so unnerved at the prospect of a McCain nomination that she suggested that some despondent conservatives would turn themselves into "suicide voters" and cast a ballot for a Democrat in November rather than vote for McCain. (Charles Hurt, the D.C. bureau chief for the New York Post, made the same unhinged analogy.)



Suicide voters and anal poisonings, all in the name of destroying the Republican nominee from within. Hey, GOP, that's quite a Noise Machine you've constructed. Now good luck trying to dismantle it.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gop, rush limbaugh, john mccain

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"A Schadenfreude Sundae"
Posted by: Xynyx on Feb 15, 2008 11:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "A Schadenfreude Sundae" Posted by: SkeeterVT1
» Beck? Posted by: Prairie Waif
Just like the Christian right ...
Posted by: Ryan on Feb 15, 2008 12:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the idea of suicide vote and other things is just to reassure these people that the christian/far right is the force to recon with in elections and that if they are not there to vote no one will get into the WH unless its a democrat. They ignore of course that they will make no difference this time around even when they would all vote, but these tricks are just to talk straight/spin their upcoming loss. And they sacrafice McCain for that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Good riddens"
Posted by: carbon-based on Feb 15, 2008 12:45 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and imagine Rush is supporting Obama and Ann Coulter is a Hillary fan. I bet they are glad to hand them over to the dems.

Seems the GOP finally has a good candidate!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Good riddens" Posted by: Lauren
Don't Count Your Chickens...
Posted by: Xynyx on Feb 15, 2008 1:56 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this sort of congratulatory message may be a bit premature... for a few reasons.

1. The GOP may well recognize that Iraq and anything else GW starts before he leaves office will be a complete cluster-f for the next President. There tends to be a lot of inertia with wars, and the next President may have a very hard time withdrawing fully, meaning s/he will have lots of time to look like s/he's screwing things up or not getting the job done... whatever. They just may be hoping the next President, who may be having to fall on his/her own sword, will be a Democrat.

2. It's not a foregone conclusion that the Democrat will win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rush is entertaining?
Posted by: MobileSucks on Feb 15, 2008 2:01 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It just so happens that by chance I came across Limbaugh's radio program recently. I didn't even know when or on what channel it comes on in my area. I listened to some of it out of curiosity because you hear so much about the big mouth jerk and I hadn't really listened to him in years, other than small clips that sometimes appear on TV. Anyway, he was going off on McCain. It's great! I have actually tuned in repeatedly to listen to this. Can't help but enjoy it. The Republicans are indeed in trouble.

It was only so long before their "Big Tent" would come down. They sure as hell had a long run. But something tells me they'll be back. So, enjoy this moment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ush is entertaining? Posted by: Sparks56
Don't be fooled: this is a calculated ploy
Posted by: ToLo on Feb 15, 2008 5:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the Limbaugh/O'Really/Coulter set are trying to do is paint MacCain as "too liberal" for the right. It's on a par with constantly calling the press "liberal" even when you and I know that the press is corporate-owned and hardly liberal at all. It serves them to keep pulling to the right, always to the right.

Don't be fooled by this apparent hysteria. It's designed to do one thing: make Independent voters vote for McCain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That doesn't make sense, Posted by: stoicnag
The Party's Over!
Posted by: Quannah on Feb 15, 2008 5:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's hope the GOP "Love Affair" with these wingnuts is soon over! Without the Elephants, who will the audience be for these bloviating windbags? Certainly not people in the center! And certainly not people on the LEFT!

As I've said before... let them feast on their own! They're too stupid to know it's bad for business to bite the hands that have fed them for the last 20 years!

Ding, Dong! The Witches are Dead! (can't happen soon enough!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rush Limbaugh for president; O'Reilly for VP
Posted by: willymack on Feb 15, 2008 6:25 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, that's it. That's the ticket! Think things are screwed up now? Just wait 'till these numbskulls put their heads together. The past eight years would be but a fond memory of the good old days in comparison.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Limbaugh is a child
Posted by: SicfkOfBush on Feb 15, 2008 7:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you take a close look at Limbaugh what you see is a very immature child. The two terms of this administration resemble an elementary school, with Limbaugh as the class clown, Cheney is the school bully, while Bush is class president. All of them living with their myopic view of what the world is about. And, like the children, after their temper tantrums, they leave the classroom in shambles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Limbaugh is a child Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Limbaugh is a child Posted by: Bobby Decker
» RE: Limbaugh is a child Posted by: Quannah
This article is in violation
Posted by: Dboy on Feb 15, 2008 10:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is in violation of a very basic rule:

Never interrupt your enemy when he is about to make a mistake.


dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I agree w/others, here - glee is premature
Posted by: yantacaw on Feb 15, 2008 11:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's fine to hope the fascist wing of the GOP will self-destruct, but we should remember:

There's still a deep sickness in our society that has allowed the Right to rule & injure our nation -- almost unchallenged -- for years now.

That sickness isn't gonna suddenly disappear just because a few of the more visbile Conservative sociopaths choke on their own vomit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's Send Him to the Front Lines
Posted by: aussidawg on Feb 16, 2008 1:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Even last year when Limbaugh denigrated members of the U.S. armed forces, calling military men and women who criticized the war in Iraq and advocated withdrawal "phony

soldiers," what did the GOP do? It rushed to Limbaugh's defense."


Phoney soldiers eh? Well Mr. Limbaugh, since you are so brave and patriotic. Since you are so pro-war...I have a suggestion. Why don't you go grab your trusty M-16, load your fat ass on the next plane bound for Bagdad, and put your ass on the line. Hey, who knows, maybe you will get lucky and get wounded. Just think of the great rewards following that!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rush Limbaugh and his ilk
Posted by: bitsfick on Feb 16, 2008 3:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are the symptom, not the disease, when Ann Coulter can make a remark like "Edwards is a faggot, and a room full of supposedly educated, intelligent, professional adults applaud her, then we have some very sick individuals in this country. Please note I said supposedly intelligent, when you think name calling is the answer to all the problems in the world, your not too bright.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FINALLY! The GOP IMPLODES!
Posted by: kc10ken on Feb 16, 2008 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I LOVE it! I LOVE watching the whores (Hannity, Limpdick, Coulter) slit their wrists!
This is going to be FUN FUN FUN!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't malign whores like that Posted by: stoicnag
Riddle
Posted by: Sparks56 on Feb 16, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is the difference between Rush Limbaugh and the Hindenburg?
Ans: One is a flaming Nazi gas bag, and the other is a dirigible.
Limbaugh reminds me of the many dictators the US supported and promoted when it suited certain foreign policy objectives until the ally broke out of the pasture and turned into a huge, uncontrollable liability.
Karl Rove's Thousand Year Reich/Permanant Republican Majority is disintegrating like planets colliding,(or the Hindenburg burning). The religious whackos and the CPAC puritans are spinning madly off leaving the Republicans moderates all alone wondering what he hell happened.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Cult of the Rabid ReichWing Radio is dying.....
Posted by: xvictor on Feb 16, 2008 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Limbo, Sean, O'Reilly, and Coulter to name a disgusting few, are very displeased their radio audience are not bowing and genuflecting to their Diktats. For example, they had been going around the country giving speeches to their "red" state audience strongly whoring for Rudy Giuliani only to see their boy hurtle down in flames. They no longer count as the influential voice of the Rabid ReichWing.

Even during the early years of the Bush regime, just after the evident debacle of the Iraqi occupation, Rush Limbo was losing audience share. He regained some of it only after his radio show broadcasted football and sports bits!

They had resorted to gimmicks to tempt a shrinking crowd with their upside down world view. This was a failed attempt at mimicking Hitler's Minister Josef Goebbels' formula of mixing propaganda with 'wholesome' entertainment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe it's a "rope-a-dope"
Posted by: Democritus on Feb 16, 2008 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Progressives might now sit back with a smile as Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter et. al., engage in the feast of Republicans eating their own. But maybe progressives shouldn't get too comfortable. If independent voters and moderate Republicans are put in mind of the former McCain, the maverick who rode the "Straight-talk express," by the brickbats being thrown his way, they might deceive themselves into thinking he's worth voting for.

They should not be deceived. Limbaugh and company are correct in their criticism of McCain, but for all the wrong reasons. McCain, in being against overturning Roe v. Wade before he was for it, and being for a ban on torture before he was against it, has now shown that, if elected, we will have four more years of George W. Bush's failed policies. Add to this a more strident gun-boat diplomacy, and you have what McCain would be as president: Bush on steroids.

So what those who are now trashing McCain's candidacy might be doing is suggesting to voters that McCain's recent far-right stands are a political ruse, and that he will revert to moderation if elected. This might pull in the moderates and independents. The far-righters will then "hold their noses" and vote for McCain--where else can they go?--and McCain might capture the White House. Then Limbaugh and company can sit back and congratulate themselves on having hoodwinked American voters one more time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Maybe it's a "rope-a-dope" Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: Maybe it's a "rope-a-dope" Posted by: sofla100
» RE: Maybe it's a "rope-a-dope" Posted by: MobileSucks
We conservatives are also sitting back and smiling
Posted by: Blink on Feb 16, 2008 6:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's enjoyable watching Billary fighting for political life and losing to a Big Nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BOBBY DECKER
Posted by: Bobby Decker on Feb 16, 2008 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MAYBE?.......THE INSIDE TRADERS WHO RUN AMERICA INC.....WANT TO HAND THE KEYS OVER TO A ONE TERM JIMMY CARTER SACRIFICAL LAMB...RIGHT BEFORE THE WHOLE FREE TRADE SHITHOUSE GOS UP IN FLAMES.....THAT.L GIVE EM 4 MORE YEARS TO FIND THERE NEXT RONALD REAGAN?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DO YOU.....
Posted by: LANCE on Feb 16, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....REALLY trust these ass-clowns?

Limbaugh hates "Bomber" McKook, Coulter loves Hillary, Hannity loves anyone who will destroy the US Treasury to suit HIS personal lifestyle.
These people are nothing more than products of the Reagan 'ME' generation of selfish, loathing pugs who would sell out America for a nickel bag of coke.

They're nothing but white trash who got rich.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DO YOU..... Posted by: aussidawg
Stupid Dems, We Think It's Good to Be Cows Waiting in Line at the Slaughter House!
Posted by: sofla100 on Feb 16, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot believe many Dems think this is actually a good thing! What this really is about is a perfect strategy to clinch the White House in November for McCain. First of all, it lets McCain score a big hit with Independents and Cross-Over voters. After all, he is not going to be "bossed around" by the Right Wing. Second of all, it equates the Right Wing and the Evangelicals more squarely onto the shoulders of the unpopular GW Bush. After all, everyone knows how much they supported the infamous GW last election time. Next, it gives McCain pesudo progressive credentials. See, McCain is not liked by Limbaugh because he supported Bushes so-called immigration reform and the fake Campaign Finance Reform bills. From a dem perspective, these bills were shams anyway, hardly any reform in them at all. But, now with Limbaugh and Coulter ranting away, McCain looks like he really stands for something innovative and progressive, boosting him even more with the electorate. Next, McCain is in a perfect position to strip the Latino vote away from the Dem candidate in the big states of California, Texas and Florida. After all, he supported "immigration reform," and "paid for it" with the Republican hit-men. Lastly, nobody conservative, no matter what, in the South, is going to vote for Hillary and they sure as hell won't vote for a "black man." So, this voting bloc does not have to be courted right now, they can be put on hold. Then, one week or two before the election, Limbaugh, Coulter, and all of them will have a change of heart. McCain is going to become their God and Savior. So election day comes, and its a slaughter of the Dems. In fact, we are like cows in a slaughter house right now, thinking it's a good thing while we are wating in line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I think you are way off base..... Posted by: Fencerider
Lush Rambozo
Posted by: jmmartin on Feb 16, 2008 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a shameless concatenation of indiscretions by the one and only Lush Rambo! How dare you, sir! Have you no shame? (And just for the record, when you state that neocon pundits are leapfrogging each other to denounce McCain and suggest that conservatives "should even vote Democratic come November," you make a glaring grammatical error. It's not "vote Democratic," but "vote Democrat." That's the way Our Great Leader says it, and you know how erudite he is.)

The choicest part of your diatribe concerned Sen. Linsie Glam as a potential running mate. I have long suspected that the "secret pol" porn publisher Larry Flynt keeps hinting he's about to out is none other than either Sen. Mitch McComical or Linsie. One of the latter's home state newspapers, noting he's about the only unmarried senator in D.C., asked rhetorically if he might be, er, ah, you know. To which Linsie said he just hadn't found anyone yet, or he was too busy helping his constituents, &c.

Wouldn't it be just grand if McCain actually chose Glam and Flynt let it be known that McCain had a homo as a running mate? I can't wait! Perhaps McComical will be Secretary of
State and Larry Crag Secretary of Wide Stance Tearoom Technique.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think you misunderstand Rush
Posted by: kmeyer on Feb 16, 2008 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think he gives a damn about much of anything except his career. If you were him would you rather spend the next four years having to tepidly defend McCain, or shamelessly attacking either Obama or (preferably for him, I suppose) Clinton? You don't think he actually believes the crap he spouts all day, do you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't "misunderestimate" Rush Posted by: omatravel
» You and Bobby Decker Posted by: stoicnag
CPAC vs. The World
Posted by: gradioc on Feb 16, 2008 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't fool yourselves into thinking CPAC and the Grover Norquist machine give a damn whether a Democrat or a Republican outside their circle wins. The GOP is useless to them if they cannot completely control it. Now, if they really cared about half the Neaderthal drivel they spew, half a loaf might be better than none, but they don't. It's all a matter of gaining and retaining the power to reward their supporters. If they're out of power, they're out of business, and the K Street money machine dries up for them. Sure, there are true believers, but most of this bunch are just shills for whoever pays them. That's why they did not mind Romney changing every opinion he'd ever held. They don't expect you to actually buy into this crap, just to play the game, mouth the right platitudes, and do as you're told once you get in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whats wrong with criticism?
Posted by: daniel1982 on Feb 16, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For whatever reason Rush doesn't like McCain and doesn't consider his ideals and beliefs to be compatible with conservatism, hence the criticism. Is that really so bad?

Compare that to what happened with Kerry, who very few progressives actually liked. But they all kept their mouth shut, because beating Bush was all they wanted. Kerry was not chosen because he represented your beliefs. He was chosen because he was thought to be the one most electable.

Which stance is more honorable?

//

It seems like the left is not above misinformation. I was listening to the show (gasp) when the statement was uttered. I didn't think anything of it because this was preceded by a segment on Jesse MacBeth, a real phony soldier, who was embraced by anti-war left due to this outrageous claims of torture. The context made it clear who the phony soldiers were.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

realist
Posted by: vincen13 on Feb 16, 2008 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Limbaugh and his minions are hate-mongers. America and the 13.5 million people who listen to him and his ilk should be ashamed of themselves for every buying his disc jockey drivel. I've known a lot of addicts and pain-killer junkies who are irrational and hostile. But he's the only one with a national audience.

What is wrong with the citizens of the U.S. that they listen to him, at all, EVER?????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I agree, Vincen Posted by: Ellie1
» RE: vincen13 Posted by: MtnWolfGrl
What a Circus!
Posted by: keefus55 on Feb 16, 2008 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would love dearly to know how far Mr. Limbaugh's audience ratings have fallen as of late and what the demographics (age, income and education level, etc.) of his ever-shrinking audience is. My hunch is that his remaining audience represents the more ignorant wing of the Republican party as most of the rest of us (that is...those with our own "half a brain tied behind our backs") have already left.

For the past seven years, Mr. Limbaugh and his "show" have been masquerading as little more than a convenient mouthpiece for our "Prevaricator-in-Chief"...whose own approval ratings are also now down in the "thirty-somethings".

Clearly, NEITHER of these clowns have ever represented the will of the mainstream of American society. And all of their internecine squabbles are simply more reliable indicators that the "ship" they are all on is now sinking....fast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What a Circus! Posted by: Magginkat
» RE: What a Circus! Posted by: keefus55
wilmafromkansas
Posted by: wilmafromkansas on Feb 16, 2008 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting possibilities

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wilmafromkansas
Posted by: wilmafromkansas on Feb 16, 2008 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has Bush's ratings gone UP??!! Last I heard he was having trouble breaking 20

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't believe the BS
Posted by: Magginkat on Feb 16, 2008 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suspect this is all show. Watch these locksteppers fall in line when the final campaign begins. It matters not whether it's Hillary or Obama, they will be spewing hatred 24/7, & claiming that the world will surely end if a Democrat is elected.

These Nazis are all the same....a bag of hot air for anything republican/conservative. They have proved time and again that they will kiss any ass necessary to keep their boys in charge.

If it's not show, let's hope they all go hunting with Dead Eye Dick and that his aim is a little better this time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WONDERFUL!!
Posted by: mountainmama on Feb 16, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a wonderful article!!! Love it, love it! Thanks, Eric, we needed this bit of insight and levity right now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Honking In a Tunnel
Posted by: rigpa44 on Feb 16, 2008 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rush and the neo-con's are glad to bad-mouth anyone who steps up as the people's choice as the Republican nominee. Why? Because when they lose, and they will, they can say "see I told you so" and avoid blame for anything negative that happens. It's like honking in a tunnel so the sound is more powerful, even though the original message is just a simple horn honking. Throwing mind-crap on top of mind-crap just makes the pile stink at a more concentrated level of odor. At this point, it stinks to high heaven. There's a simple solution: stop listening to the honking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But I'm going to MISS them if they eat each other
Posted by: Suz on Feb 16, 2008 10:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What will I do when there's nothing left but carcasses to gnaw upon? Whom shall I ridicule? Whom shall I mock?

Oh, Rush, please don't eat all the fodder--leave some for the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

better for Republicans to realize how wacky Rush etc are
Posted by: whealeydj on Feb 16, 2008 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republicans should realize how extreme these commentators/haters are when they attack McCain even after he apparently has nomination sewn up. It will be interesting to see if McCain continues to tack to the right during the general election. I hope Dems can win and I hope the mainstream media decides it is time to drop that rabid radical right wing from the podium if they do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

political cartoonist part of Rush gang
Posted by: whealeydj on Feb 16, 2008 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ramirez who is a syndicated columbnist for Investors Daily and seems to have become more prevalent lateley seems like he is part of Rush hate crowd. I am used to his regular portrayl of Democrats as traitors in his cartoons, but he has had some anti Mccain cartoons

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kill the goose to get the egg.
Posted by: antu on Feb 16, 2008 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I simply watch who the big money is backing. The agenda of the ruling class is NOT the same as what is good for the American people.
If the people do not go for the corporate/insurance/banking/groomed candidate, they'll steal the presidency again.
From what I see Hillary is the only one left for them to back.
Because she is groomed.
I like what she is saying, but I don't trust her at all.
It's the same thing as George Bush saying he will insure continued low gas prices in 2000 campaign.
Of course the best thing that happens in our presidential races is people like John Edwards and Nader get to air their high quality issues, in msm public... while both the dems and reps continue to spout useless rhetoric, and cater to the wealthy every step of the way.
Just look at the latest farm bill.... The fools will kill the goose to get the egg.
I see our political system broken, there are no real leaders rising up out of the commercial/greed fray of America today.
The ruling class wants to flatten the world economy. Shock capitalism capitalizing on economic/war/natural disaster.
Kill the goose.
It doesn't matter who's in office, or what nasty things Rush says. It is and has been out of the hands of the voters for a long long time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Every Link in This Article: Page Not Found
Posted by: BobBrrz on Feb 16, 2008 12:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The noise machine must be very sensitive; I think you've
hurt them. Somebody has blocked every one of the links in this article.

bobbrrz

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Something (more) wicked...
Posted by: siniculone89 on Feb 16, 2008 12:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me the retention of the status quo, war-contracting, tax breaks..etc,is too much of a good thing for this group to simply be ended by the election of a Democratic candidate (especially either a blackman or a woman),even hypothetically. The only thing these people have been willing to do is exploit the fear that has driven their lucrative economy. Witness Romneys' exit speech, another "Demoncrat-surrender-monkey" salute to the opposing front-runner who didn't vote for the war. McCains' war hero status will play well, but not well enough unless their is another fear catalyst. The fact that there are Americans militant enough to sacrifice themselves to the dementia of keeping minorities and women,"in their place", should not be taken lightly.
John McCain is meant to be a war candidate, be careful of what they wish for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mixing political strategy, for-profit entertainment radio, and policy expectations...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 16, 2008 1:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is dangerous to one's grip on the political process--the thing that matters--even if it enhances one's understanding of the radio business.

Rush has ~30M listeners? If they all did exactly what he told them to, they'd make up 10% of the electorate, in scattered pockets.

Limbaugh sells gold and mattresses. That's what he does for a living. Hannity sells steaks, without ever having to butcher a cow.
The hand-wringing over the effect that these salesmen have had on our country and the celebration over their "revolt" is mightily misplaced, if one is speaking about public policy, rather than advertising revenue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DELICIOUS ARTICLE AND COMMENTS!
Posted by: 1984NOW!!! on Feb 16, 2008 2:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure which of the scenarios suggested by the comments the Repugs are up to but what we know of their tactics is that we DON'T OR CAN'T TRUST THEM.
CONDI RICE might be chosen McCain's VP, I think he should go for it. If South Conservatives won't vote for a women or a black person, this should really stun them blinder.
I wonder what Limpy would say then?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You ever notice
Posted by: Ellie1 on Feb 16, 2008 2:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that almost all of these miserable limp wristed uninformed neocon a-holes live in Florida, or some other nearby red state?

Pray for a hurricane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Limbaugh as the horse race
Posted by: Yossarian on Feb 16, 2008 2:19 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Giving Limbaugh notoriety with major blather on who he supports and doesn't support, who likes him, who loathes him is of no value. This is celebrity pop pap. People magazine of the left. Give us serious content.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rush Limbaugh
Posted by: graffen48 on Feb 16, 2008 2:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is a fat ugly gasbag who suffers from small penis syndrome.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh come on, Rush is just an entertainer
Posted by: dayahka on Feb 16, 2008 2:53 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Politics is entertainment, and Rush is just a great political entertainer, perhaps one who appeals to the lowest common denominator, but great nonetheless. As for the argument that little old Rush, rolly-polly Rush is destroying the Republican party, that is a joke. What do you think George Bush, a fascist totalitarian masquerading as a Republican, has been doing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Showman
Posted by: AlunZMun on Feb 16, 2008 4:48 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Limbaugh is doing what he does for himself. Limbaugh is not for the Republican Party, he is not for the betterment of this country, nor even mankind. Also, he is NOT a two faced liar, he is a self-proclaimed showmen. If a democrat, or even a republican whom he chooses to vilify, becomes president, that would be the better show for his style of entertainment. And how does he know he is entertaining? His bank account proves it. Yes sir, there is lots of money to be made riling the uninformed mob. Step right up folks. . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kaixo
Posted by: lasarte-oria on Feb 16, 2008 5:01 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Substitute the word 'conservative' for any religious group (Catholics, Muslims, Jews) and we're looking at a religious schism. I guess Rush is the big cheese of 'Conservativism' - a Zarthusta/John Smith figure who 'knows' the 'true' conservativism. You know, when you build a party on religious standards, ain't it just when it behaves like one?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hee-Haw-Larious!
Posted by: deepseas on Feb 16, 2008 5:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Absolutely hilarious! You simply cannot make this stuff up. Limp Puff has gotten too big for his pants and thinks he can manipulate the entire party.

This is what happens when you deal with unprofessionals...they don't know how to read charts and graphs that say their ratings are low and the tide has turned.

Seeing as how higher-ups are almost begging him to stop, he must have lots of pull with Bush/Cheney/Rove. That's how deep up their arse he's been. Anyone else they would have pulled the plug on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if you think Rush is funny
Posted by: lionsdenmother on Feb 16, 2008 9:14 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you think Rush is funny , you should hear mark levin, he sounds like his head is going to explode during some of his rants. oh my and his callers , he is rude and calls them idiots and they still love him.. why anyone would call him when he insults 99 percent of them is beyond me. but it is funny as hell. i think you can listen to him online somewhere i think he has a website but i listen to him on our local houston fox talk radio 740am

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Feb 17, 2008 12:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I (Heart) Rush Limbaugh

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GrOPers atwitter
Posted by: Knowmad on Feb 17, 2008 4:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've often wondered where the phrase "Bum's rush" originated. Now I know.

What with the pathetic but wonderfully entertaining clown show the right has become, I just couldn't help trying to capture the spectacle in the purity of Haiku - if only for the contrast.

Pebbles in the pond
Crazed guppies turn on their own
Simpletons aboil


Cheers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gush Limberger is A Loud Mouthed Reptilian GAS-BAG!
Posted by: williameon on Feb 17, 2008 6:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His Grossness is a highly paid media prostitute.
Everything he says is contrived Double Speak.
Is he a direct conduit for direct Rovian BU__! SH__!?
For now on let's:
Never speak of him again.

Why do you think all of these Zeo-Con Fascist Operatives are invading alternative media?
They own 99% of the media already and they still want the rest.
Greed is Evil!
Media is the Message!
Do they want to control the conversation and condition you with false information?
Has he ever told the truth?
He is a Predator!
Can a Leopard change his spots?

They know the power of the Microphone!
They’ll sit there and spew Fascist Hypnotic Dogma as long as you let them.
Enough already!
We have more important things to do!
Then to get caught in that trap again.
We have to get rid of them first.
Then repair the damage to our Environment, the fabric of our Society and our Lives.
Only then will we have ample time to institute positive change.
Will we ever get rid of them if we let them infiltrate the movement now?
It has always been a one way street.
They want all the Money, Power and Glory but, none of the pain.
T6hat is the way it has been up to now.
Will it take more than just a need for change and a positive message?
I think so.
These guys play hardball.
They have the resources and The Dark Army to back them up.
Why do you think Rove resigned for?
He wants to do us in.
He has done it before!
Will we let him get away with it again?
What kind of dirty tricks will they use to steal the next selection?
I leave nothing beyond them.
What is the depth of the depravity they will sink to?
War?
Mass murder?

Been there, done that!

All bets are off.
Will their giant Phallic symbol?
Doomsday Weapon appear?

Been there, done that!

They are professional liars playing in the Big Leagues.
Vicious Assassins.
Turn them off.
They've had their turn.
Now it is ours.
Keep the Microphone on message: The Truth.
Let them recede back into the shadows and into the obscurity they justly deserve.
They are Karmic Vampires.
They want to suck the life force right out of the Top of your head.
SUCK! SUCK! SUCK!
He will say anything to get your attention
And
Once he has it?
You are Dead Meat!
The Hypnotic techniques he uses are powerful, proven and invasive.
He will jump right into your Head.
Are there enough Ditto Zombies already?

Conditioning!
Repetition!
Lies!
Deceit!

He Wins.
You Lose.
Never mention His Ugliness again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too soft
Posted by: luckypuck on Feb 17, 2008 11:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Limbaugh is just wildly out of touch with the Republican Party." Limbaugh and his subspecies among the Noise Machinists are wildly out of touch with the human race.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RUSH
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 18, 2008 2:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the author of this piece. Rush Limbaugh is trying to destroy the Republican party.

GO, RUSH, GO!!!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rush wins either way
Posted by: onevoter on Feb 18, 2008 7:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rush wins either way--this is a ploy to get Independents to vote for McCain, so he wins.
Then, just like W, he will run to the right and give them conservative Supremes. Or, they go ahead and get Hillary (or Obama) in office and can have 4 more years of trash talk.

He's trying to raise a new generation of Ditto-heads!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rush Limbaugh 'rush-'lim-baa _ angry fatman on the radio.
Posted by: yale on Feb 19, 2008 5:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just thought I would throw a little humer at the situation. Ive read all the posts here and Iam almost inclined to think those who think what Rush and all the big talk are up to is a well calculated move on their part. All the undecided swing voters may lean towards Mccain if they think the angry fatman doesnt want him. The republican party is in deep trouble and they themselves know it, and this is something of a last ditch effort to fool voters. When it comes to sneaky, dirty, controlling tactics, who do we all think of? Rush, and all the wannabees, and the conservitive republican movement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I want to inform this
Posted by: boundjymind on Feb 21, 2008 5:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to inform this. People see many celebrities on a std personal site called Herpesmates.com

What happen? It is reported this site launchs a new feature 'Ask STD Counselor', many people get online help from this std counselor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement