Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

AMC's 'Mad Men': Sexism and the '60s

By Marcia G. Yerman, AlterNet. Posted December 3, 2007.


Matthew Weiner's show Mad Men provides a window for today's young women to learn about the conditions that shaped previous generations of feminists, from whom they often feel estranged.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When I first saw the previews for Mad Men on cable's AMC, I was sure it wasn't going to be my cup of tea. Too many smug white men chain smoking, drinking and enjoying their power. Women with Marilyn Monroe figures were on the fringes, minorities were invisible. In short, I didn't think there was much to engage me. But I decided to watch the first episode, followed by "The Making of Mad Men," with creator, writer, and executive producer Matthew Weiner discussing his vision. I became totally hooked.

Here was the type of show that invariably got yanked from network television for being edgy and cerebral. As I watched the series unfold, I realized that the show could be a window for today's young women, illustrating the conditions that shaped previous generations of feminists, from whom they often feel estranged.

It also forced me to look at and acknowledge how male behavior was constricted by formulated societal roles. Where The Man in the Grey Flannel Suit was a look at the mid-'50s simultaneous to the unfolding of the Eisenhower era, Mad Men is an examination in hindsight. Before anyone dreamed of a women's movement, black power or gay liberation, the show's characters experienced the first stirrings of awareness.

We watch with omniscience and are able to recognize the black elevator operator who is imperceptible to the employees he transports daily, the closeted homosexual who protects his true identity and the unmarried Jewish female executive looking to reframe her father's Manhattan department store without the pushcart stigma.

Each episode begins with a free falling man, accompanied by music with ominous overtones. The stage is set for a time of duplictiousness, when people were not sure of who they were, but knew who it was not safe to be. Weiner uses the Madison Avenue advertising agency, Sterling Cooper, as his setting. Their job is to sell the American public a version of what life should be. The team of executives uses its expertise to put forth a model where truth and deception are intrinsically intertwined.

Weiner treads the line between presenting male and female characters as stereotypes to be judged and evolving personalities with deep, rich complexity. He explores each individual's interior landscape, a place they are not yet willing or able to go to. At the center of the drama is Don Draper (Jon Hamm), the quintessentially tall, dark and handsome man. A strong, silent type who can't express his emotions to his wife, the roots of his psychological conflict are revealed midseason. In one of the last episodes, we see how while serving in the Korean War, he exchanges his name and dog tags with another soldier who has been killed. He takes on the dead man's name, obliterating his birth history of origin. Draper invents a fabricated identity for himself in the same way he will later develop ad campaigns for clients. His personal story becomes a metaphor for the theme of the show. How we design ourselves to present to the world, within the context of our particular culture. The '50s were the ultimate period of contrived appearances and deceptive artifice. That way of life had to lead to the explosion of the 1960s, because so many people could no longer afford to implode.

In looking at the four primary female characters, we see a spectrum of types emblematic of the time frame. They are all white, reflecting the slice of pie Weiner has cut. One, Rachel, is Jewish, which puts her squarely in the "outsider" zone. When she comes to the agency looking for counsel on how to reposition her business, it is decided that a Jewish staff member should be present at the meeting. They finally locate an employee ... someone who works in the mailroom. Rachel is independent, honest and able to function as an equal in a man's world, creating a counterpoint to Don's wife, Betty. When queried by email about her character, actress Maggie Seff described her as "a woman ahead of her time." It is significant that, although she and Don are so obviously different, they connect on a deeply instinctual level.

Betty (January Jones) is the classic Grace Kelly prototype. At the start of the series we see her suffering from numbness in her hands, a somatic condition that is the manifestation of her anxiety and emotional conflict. She begins seeing a classic Freudian therapist, who reports to her husband on her progress (a nod to the disregard of patient/doctor privilege). Betty knows that something is wrong, but she can't put her finger on what it is.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: feminism, workplace, sexism, mad men, amc, matthew weiner, sixties

Marcia G. Yerman is based in New York City. Her writings -- profiles, interviews, essays and articles -- focus on women's issues and the arts. She recently worked at the Women's Media Center as a consultant on women and culture.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
bikey
Posted by: bikey on Dec 3, 2007 3:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A great show indeed and available/watched around the world (for we who lived through it are scattered bunch indeed). One forgets that this was the situation not only in the 1950s but well into the 1960s. An excellent novel on the same subject, buried til now but soon to be a 'major motion picture' is Richard Yates' Revolutionary Road'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excellent Show
Posted by: midwestblue on Dec 3, 2007 4:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm looking forward to the next season. Betty (Draper's wife) and Peggy (the "working girl") are the two most interesting characters, in my view. Both are limited by the '50's/early 60's male perception of women. The strong, entreprenuer, Jewish woman inherited her status from her father, and although she's good in business, I don't find her nearly as interesting as those women who are trapped by stereotype.
The men, in their own way, are also trapped in this culture. They're womanizing boozers, to be sure, but they have no other life BUT work.
I see, in this sometimes funny and sometimes very serious show, a time far away, yet uncomfortably close to our culture now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Counter culture threw baby out with bathwater
Posted by: Bobsays on Dec 3, 2007 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The counter culture was right to point out how badly gays, women and minorities were treated. But where they got it very wrong was to attack the family unit. The damage and fall-out from this is all around us. Obesity crisis, ghettoes, drug gangs - you name it, and its source is usually a lack of any discipline because of the breakdown of the family (and thus the community).

While we were told friends would step in to replace the family, this has not been the case. People have become more shallow and materialistic, and thus unwilling to do the kind of things family members would do in the past (take care of the sick, etc.).

When you see that man smoking his cigarette and spouting his sexist views, also see a man who didn't make excuses for stealing, didn't sell drugs, probably served in the army, and worked until he retired. He also gave most of his money to his family and compared to the trash you see out on the streets, was a net contributor to society. Something to think about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why doesn't Alternet...
Posted by: Q30 on Dec 3, 2007 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...ever post an article about the "sexism" of Selective Service?

I mean, that seems pretty relevant, what with the WARS that are going on and all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why doesn't Altern Posted by: bikey
Talkin' 'bout my generation.
Posted by: Sojourner on Dec 3, 2007 8:58 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't watch cable tv, but I also don't want to relive those years. Those where my college and university years. We did have a few critiques: "An American Dilemma," "Generation of Vipers," and the mentioned "Grey Flannel Suit," Freud's work, the German sociologists.

Amid the prosperity, however, even the steady and relevant complaints of "The Nation" were ignorable. I.F. Stone was happening, too, as was Senator Joe McCarthy. I lost friends in the Korean War and learned the protest folk music of the labor movement. I was finally radicalized by Dr. King's influence and have not looked back since.

Feminist anger, from the privileged white women I knew, seemed to me indistinguishable from the old battle of the sexes. For every Betty I knew, there was at least one homemaker who ruled at home with an iron pussy. I can only judge by what I have learned since, of course, but the demands for labor-saving devices were passed along from tv to the dinner table.

Betty, as described here, fits the desired American image of the rich woman whose husband could 'keep her.' Feminism may have changed the 'being kept' part, but it has not changed the competition for female riches. "You can't be too rich or too skinny" still holds. "Diamonds are (still) a girl's best friend." Men are still blamed today as they were in the '50s by those who will never have enough because we don't know the meaning of "enough."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cable TV is EXPENSIVE
Posted by: WitchyNy on Dec 3, 2007 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why don't you donate that money to an environmental group or getting rid of bush?

Most young pretty women will never 'get' the feminist movement. How could they?

Wait till they have a baby or two-till then they are just living life as men do. Me First.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The times they were (are) achangin' - an article by gretchen the gramma grand and glorious
Posted by: grethart on Dec 3, 2007 2:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IT'S ABOUT TIME. Hallelujah!
For many, many years now there has been no real public education regarding the 'women's movement' and their place in 'the civil rights activism'. This has created a polarity between the women of 'now' and the women of 'then'.

After graduating highschool in the late 50's, my first choice for further education was veterinary school. I was refused acceptance on the grounds I was a woman. Women were not allowed admittance to medical schools, veterinarian schools, engineering schools,and the like(there were, of course a few exceptions) because of their sex.
Upper level corporation jobs were basically not available to women; women could not get loans on their own; nor get credit cards, buy a car; buy property,and if married,could not participate in anything without the consent or co-signature of their husbands. There were no individual checking accounts, and no equal rights according to the laws of most States.
Women were not considered citizens comparable to men, and were forbidden to hold any job that was normally done by a man. If they did succeed in being hired for a job in a field which also employed men, the women were paid less than half of what the men were paid.
Very few women were ever elected to office, and there was a general feeling that women were inferior to the men. Attitudes such as these were perpetuated by our society, nation, and enforced by State laws. Women were considered chattel with few individual rights.Women were so accustomed to this that few questions were asked, or protests conducted.
Women were segregated from public restaurants and drinking establishments, and other meeting places, if the men so chose. Women were required to submit to their spouse's demands, as well as all rules set by the male establishment whether these bans were valid law or not.
It was social opinion of our white male society, that Women(and blacks)didn't need education, as they were thought to be incapable of comprehension, nor conducting rationally any important duties or decisions. Because women had menstrual cycles, they were considered unstable, undependable, and undesirable. Women were subject to sterilization if the 'establishment' determined that she or her possible offspring would not be 'socially suitable'.There were,however,a few of us who began to speak out, protest, form groups,have sit-ins, challenge the laws and the social 'status quo'. We fought and we fought hard. We had a Betty Friedan,a Germain Greer, a Gloria Steinham, and a Shirley Chisolm. Shirley was a black woman elected to congress, who stated that "it was more difficult for her, and she faced more prejudices being a woman in society than being black."
Our fight was long, difficult, dangerous, alienating, and tiring.
This brings us back to the 'polarity' now between the older and younger generations. Due to the courageous efforts of 'older'women, the 'now' women can have credit cards; loans; equal education; (almost)equal pay; buy a car; get a divorce; file law suits; buy property, have their own money; go to public establishments; travel alone; be a single parent; participate in consentual sexual acts; can say 'no' to sex with partner without violating any law or ordinance;choose female physicians; get jobs previously considered only for men; hold office; wear pants suits (yes, women's dress codes were even set by men); sit at a bar alone if they so chose; keep the money they earned; have their own savings accounts; and equal protection under the law. State laws were changed due to the efforts of the Women's movement.
Younger generation women should be aware of their older generation sisters' contributions, battles, and successes.These are successes and changes that the younger women can now participate in; and have the advantage of using and benefiting from without really knowing or discussing how they got them. It was war, my dears!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And two words: Foxy Knoxy Posted by: Bobsays
An excellent review...
Posted by: YogiBear on Dec 3, 2007 4:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...for an excellent, though sad, show.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And it's so much more
Posted by: jlautner on Dec 5, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with this review, that this show can help young women understand what it was like. It's an incredible, beautiful, well-written show that jolts me every time I watch.

And of course it is so much more than a re-creation of an era. The show features strong and interesting characters and excellent writing. Even if you don't care about the 60s or going back in time (I usually don't) this one is not to be missed.

Beyond all this, honestly, it's addictive and sensual and feels to me like a guilty pleasure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]