COMMENTS: 38
The World's Fourth-Largest City Outlaws Billboards, Calls It 'Visual Pollution'
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.
In 2007, the world's fourth-largest metropolis and Brazil's most important city, São Paulo, became the first city outside of the communist world to put into effect a radical, near-complete ban on outdoor advertising. Known on one hand for being the country's slick commercial capital and on the other for its extreme gang violence and crushing poverty, São Paulo's "Lei Cidade Limpa" or Clean City Law was an unexpected success, owing largely to the singular determination of the city's conservative mayor, Gilberto Kassab.
As the driving force behind the measure, mayor Kassab quelled the rebellion from the advertising industry with the help of key allies amongst the city's elite. On many occasions, Kassab made the point that he has nothing against advertising in and of itself, but rather with its excess. He explained, "The Clean City Law came from a necessity to combat pollution ... pollution of water, sound, air, and the visual. We decided that we should start combating pollution with the most conspicuous sector -- visual pollution."
Since then, billboards, outdoor video screens and ads on buses have been eliminated at breakneck speed. Even pamphleteering in public spaces has been made illegal, and strict new regulations have drastically reduced the allowable size of storefront signage. Nearly $8 million in fines were issued to cleanse São Paulo of the blight on its landscape.
One sore loser in the battle was Clear Channel Communications. Having recently entered the Brazilian market, the corporation was purchasing a Brazilian subsidiary as well as the rights to a large share of the city's billboard market. Weeks before the ban took effect, Clear Channel launched a counter-campaign in support of outdoor ads, with desperate slogans that failed to resonate with the masses: "There's a new movie on all the billboards -- what billboards? Outdoor media is culture."
Although legal challenges from businesses have left a handful of billboards standing, the city, now stripped of its 15,000 billboards, resembles a battlefield strewn with blank marquees, partially torn-down frames and hastily painted-over storefront facades. While it's unclear whether this cleanup can be replicated in other cities around the world, it has so far been a success in São Paulo: surveys indicate that the measure is extremely popular with the city's residents, with more than 70 percent approval.
Though materialism and consumerism, along with gang violence will continue to pollute the city of São Paulo, these human dramas may at least begin to unfold against a more pleasant visual backdrop.
***
NPR program On The Media's Bob Garfield interviewed Vinicius Galvao, a reporter for Folha de São Paulo, Brazil's largest newspaper, about São Paulo's ban on visual pollution.
Bob Garfield: I've seen photos of the city, and it's amazing to see this sprawling metropolis completely devoid of signage, completely devoid of logos and bright lights and so forth. What did São Paulo look like up until the ban took place?
Vinicius Galvao: São Paulo's a very vertical city. That makes it very frenetic. You couldn't even realize the architecture of the old buildings, because all the buildings, all the houses were just covered with billboards and logos and propaganda. And there was no criteria.
And now it's amazing. They uncovered a lot of problems the city had that we never realized. For example, there are some favelas, which are the shantytowns. I wrote a big story in my newspaper today that in a lot of parts of the city we never realized there was a big shantytown. People were shocked because they never saw that before, just because there were a lot of billboards covering the area.
Garfield: No writer could have [laughing] come up with a more vivid metaphor. What else has been discovered as the scales have fallen off of the city's eyes?
Galvao: São Paulo's just like New York. It's a very international city. We have the Japanese neighborhood, we have the Korean neighborhood, we have the Italian neighborhood and in the Korean neighborhood, they have a lot of small manufacturers, these Korean businessmen. They hire illegal labor from Bolivian immigrants.
And there was a lot of billboards in front of these manufacturers' shops. And when they uncovered, we could see through the window a lot of Bolivian people like sleeping and working at the same place. They earn money, just enough for food. So it's a lot of social problem that was uncovered where the city was shocked at this news.
Garfield: I want to ask you about the cultural life of the city, because, like them or not, billboards and logos and bright lights create some of the vibrancy that a city has to offer. Isn't it weird walking through the streets with all of those images just absent?
Galvao: No. It's weird, because you get lost, so you don't have any references any more. That's what I realized as a citizen. My reference was a big Panasonic billboard. But now my reference is art deco building that was covered through this Panasonic. So you start getting new references in the city. The city's got now new language, a new identity.
Garfield: Well, cleaning up the city's all well and good, but how do businesses announce to the public that they're open for business?
Galvao: That was the first response the shop owners found for this law, because the law bans billboards and also even the windows should be clean. Big banks, like Citibank, and big stores, like Dolce & Gabbana, they started painting themselves with very strong colors, like yellow, red, deep blue, and creating like visual patterns to associate the brand to that pattern or to that color.
For example, Citibank's color is blue. They're painting the building in very strong blue so people can see that from far away and they can make an association with that deep blue and Citibank.
Garfield: Now, the city has said, having undertaken this effort, it will eventually create zones where some outdoor advertising will be permitted. Do you expect São Paulo eventually to just revert to its previous clutter?
Galvao: Not to revert to previous clutter, but I think like very specific zones, I think they're going to isolate the electronic billboards in those areas, in the financial center. I don't think they should put those in residential areas as we had before.
Garfield: Now, the advertising industry is obviously not happy about this. They're complaining that they're deprived of free speech and that it's costing them jobs and revenue. But is there anyone else in São Paulo who's unhappy about this? Tell me about the public at large. What's their view?
Galvao: It's amazing, because people on the streets are strongly supporting that. The owner of the buildings, even if they have to renovate a building, they're strongly supporting that. It's a massive campaign to improve the city. The advertisers, they complain, but they're agreeing with the ban. What they say is that we should have created criteria for that to organize the chaos.
Excerpted from NPR's On the Media from WNYC Radio.
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eosrk on Aug 21, 2007 5:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: billboards make a city look tacky, anyway
Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: billboards make a city look tacky, anyway
Posted by: rk_tech68fl
» RE: billboards make a city look tacky, anyway
Posted by: willymack
» RE: billboards make a city look tacky, anyway
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Aug 21, 2007 6:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I usually contact those on the election signs and complain about THEIR poluting my neighborhood and how could I vote form someone with such disregard..It usually doesnt work!!! It's a bad sign for sure when the politician doesnt care!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: henderson on Aug 21, 2007 6:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm pleased with the idea of eliminating all the disgusting advertisments so prevalent on our highways and in our cities. ("Uncovering" anything may just be another way of getting at "the truth"......in more ways than one.) I'm encouraged that it helped owners realize that their buildings needed repair, etc.
Let's "uncover" EVERYTHING.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JJinIthaca on Aug 21, 2007 6:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, didn't the writer say something about a ban on pamphlets? THAT really does sound like an infringement on free speech. Hardly a visual/[commercial] pollution, pamphlets. What do people have to say about that; what is it's rationale, if indeed pamphleteering is banned? Is that really passing muster, I mean, the courts, including that of public opinion?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: commercial clutter, yech
Posted by: peterb
» RE: commercial clutter, yech
Posted by: katz22br
» RE: commercial clutter, yech
Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: commercial clutter, yech
Posted by: ArtemInox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MobileSucks on Aug 21, 2007 6:47 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Im not Mobile
Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: Im not Mobile
Posted by: hellofriends
» RE: They are against freedom.
Posted by: ArtemInox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive on Aug 21, 2007 7:20 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One note: The writer is from Adbusters. A magazine devoted to changing the 21st Century look of America. Sounds commendable.
AdBusters
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lynned2002 on Aug 21, 2007 7:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Visual Calm
Posted by: pete ess
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrSuess on Aug 21, 2007 8:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Indianapolis banned them long ago
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Aug 21, 2007 8:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
good luck seeing THE COUNTRYSIDE... even if you're going 200km/hr... the only thing you'll see on a Tennessee highway is advertising for BigIndustry....
ummmm Affluenza.
yummy.
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian.com
Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mcstewey on Aug 21, 2007 11:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Aug 21, 2007 12:50 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Aug 21, 2007 2:37 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, web sites have bills to pay, so let's limit the ban to all ads that flash, move, or pop-up. All static ads can stay.
For example, there was this one site that had some annoying ads on it, but I can't seem to remember the name...Hmmm....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pzzp on Aug 21, 2007 3:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Billboards are a blight and take away from both natural and architectural beauty.
The naming of places and venues after commercial entities is a brainwash.
The enslavement of nature and animal images in the service of advertising is immoral.
Why tolerate these things? If more people spoke out or refused to buy products pushed in these ways, changes would happen.
Advertising is not freedom of speech because it is not speech, it's a pitch.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 21, 2007 4:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the billboard eyesores that pock our landscapes and the trees saved by limiting flyer inserts would be a good start at limiting polution... noise & air polution get most of the attention [deservidly so] but do what you can now before it to late to do anything at all
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: skyobrien on Aug 21, 2007 7:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1997, the state commissioned an independent study of outdoor advertising to review the success of the billboard ban and to assess other forms of advertising. Public opinion polls and studies echoed the 1967 report. The study stated that traveler information solutions must maintain Vermont's quality environment, continue to prohibit billboards, and prevent sign clutter.
Twenty-five years have passed and Vermont is as proud as ever to be billboard-free!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ArtemInox on Aug 21, 2007 11:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I dont know about anyone else, but I like to see trees and flowers and whats left of the natural landscape on the highway when I drive, not some stupid fucking company logo or meaningless smiling face trying to sell me something, someone else on the radio is already doing that, and when I get home, someone else on the TV, in the mail, in my fucking email, on the website I go to, on my god damn phone, knocking on my fucking door, on bumper stickers, or on something I already bought, FUCK. Just stop.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Limits
Posted by: ArtemInox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ArtemInox on Aug 22, 2007 12:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: logansafi on Aug 22, 2007 8:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Astroboy on Aug 24, 2007 3:55 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thought occured to me however, while watching the video. Being inundated with so much visual advertising, people become so used to it that it gradually loses it intended affect, so one way to regain the power of billboard advertising is to make it LESS common, thereby giving it back it's novelty and strength.
So the mayor seems to me to be disengenuous in his concern for visual pollution, as is the capitulating advertising industry, because they both know that billboards will return, in a LIMITED form, and that just means it becomes a much richer commodity for which politicians and big business can manipulate and corrupt each other.
Just like everywhere else.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Shey on Aug 25, 2007 2:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Billboards are not only a blight on the landscape, they are a waste of money for advertising, the cost of which is passed on to the consumer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LatinoPundit on Aug 26, 2007 6:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Signs, signs, everywhere there's signs
Fuckin' up the scenery, breakin' my mind
Do this, don't do that, can't you read the sign
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dealmeinfo2 on Aug 27, 2007 4:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
---------------------------------------------
List of mortgage companies
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Greensleaves on Aug 28, 2007 5:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The signs intrude in our lives and sightlines. Even in the country you can hardly escape from McDonald signs.
As a bonus, maybe the toned down advertising may slow down the consumerism a bit, so we can all live simpler and greener and more beautiful lives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eosrk on Aug 21, 2007 5:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: billboards make a city look tacky, anyway
Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: billboards make a city look tacky, anyway
Posted by: rk_tech68fl
» RE: billboards make a city look tacky, anyway
Posted by: willymack
» RE: billboards make a city look tacky, anyway
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Aug 21, 2007 6:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I usually contact those on the election signs and complain about THEIR poluting my neighborhood and how could I vote form someone with such disregard..It usually doesnt work!!! It's a bad sign for sure when the politician doesnt care!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: henderson on Aug 21, 2007 6:24 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm pleased with the idea of eliminating all the disgusting advertisments so prevalent on our highways and in our cities. ("Uncovering" anything may just be another way of getting at "the truth"......in more ways than one.) I'm encouraged that it helped owners realize that their buildings needed repair, etc.
Let's "uncover" EVERYTHING.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JJinIthaca on Aug 21, 2007 6:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, didn't the writer say something about a ban on pamphlets? THAT really does sound like an infringement on free speech. Hardly a visual/[commercial] pollution, pamphlets. What do people have to say about that; what is it's rationale, if indeed pamphleteering is banned? Is that really passing muster, I mean, the courts, including that of public opinion?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: commercial clutter, yech
Posted by: peterb
» RE: commercial clutter, yech
Posted by: katz22br
» RE: commercial clutter, yech
Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: commercial clutter, yech
Posted by: ArtemInox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MobileSucks on Aug 21, 2007 6:47 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Im not Mobile
Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: Im not Mobile
Posted by: hellofriends
» RE: They are against freedom.
Posted by: ArtemInox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive on Aug 21, 2007 7:20 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One note: The writer is from Adbusters. A magazine devoted to changing the 21st Century look of America. Sounds commendable.
AdBusters
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lynned2002 on Aug 21, 2007 7:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Visual Calm
Posted by: pete ess
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrSuess on Aug 21, 2007 8:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Indianapolis banned them long ago
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Aug 21, 2007 8:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
good luck seeing THE COUNTRYSIDE... even if you're going 200km/hr... the only thing you'll see on a Tennessee highway is advertising for BigIndustry....
ummmm Affluenza.
yummy.
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian.com
Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mcstewey on Aug 21, 2007 11:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Aug 21, 2007 12:50 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Aug 21, 2007 2:37 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, web sites have bills to pay, so let's limit the ban to all ads that flash, move, or pop-up. All static ads can stay.
For example, there was this one site that had some annoying ads on it, but I can't seem to remember the name...Hmmm....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pzzp on Aug 21, 2007 3:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Billboards are a blight and take away from both natural and architectural beauty.
The naming of places and venues after commercial entities is a brainwash.
The enslavement of nature and animal images in the service of advertising is immoral.
Why tolerate these things? If more people spoke out or refused to buy products pushed in these ways, changes would happen.
Advertising is not freedom of speech because it is not speech, it's a pitch.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 21, 2007 4:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the billboard eyesores that pock our landscapes and the trees saved by limiting flyer inserts would be a good start at limiting polution... noise & air polution get most of the attention [deservidly so] but do what you can now before it to late to do anything at all
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: skyobrien on Aug 21, 2007 7:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1997, the state commissioned an independent study of outdoor advertising to review the success of the billboard ban and to assess other forms of advertising. Public opinion polls and studies echoed the 1967 report. The study stated that traveler information solutions must maintain Vermont's quality environment, continue to prohibit billboards, and prevent sign clutter.
Twenty-five years have passed and Vermont is as proud as ever to be billboard-free!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ArtemInox on Aug 21, 2007 11:32 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I dont know about anyone else, but I like to see trees and flowers and whats left of the natural landscape on the highway when I drive, not some stupid fucking company logo or meaningless smiling face trying to sell me something, someone else on the radio is already doing that, and when I get home, someone else on the TV, in the mail, in my fucking email, on the website I go to, on my god damn phone, knocking on my fucking door, on bumper stickers, or on something I already bought, FUCK. Just stop.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Limits
Posted by: ArtemInox
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ArtemInox on Aug 22, 2007 12:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: logansafi on Aug 22, 2007 8:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Astroboy on Aug 24, 2007 3:55 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thought occured to me however, while watching the video. Being inundated with so much visual advertising, people become so used to it that it gradually loses it intended affect, so one way to regain the power of billboard advertising is to make it LESS common, thereby giving it back it's novelty and strength.
So the mayor seems to me to be disengenuous in his concern for visual pollution, as is the capitulating advertising industry, because they both know that billboards will return, in a LIMITED form, and that just means it becomes a much richer commodity for which politicians and big business can manipulate and corrupt each other.
Just like everywhere else.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Shey on Aug 25, 2007 2:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Billboards are not only a blight on the landscape, they are a waste of money for advertising, the cost of which is passed on to the consumer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LatinoPundit on Aug 26, 2007 6:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Signs, signs, everywhere there's signs
Fuckin' up the scenery, breakin' my mind
Do this, don't do that, can't you read the sign
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dealmeinfo2 on Aug 27, 2007 4:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
---------------------------------------------
List of mortgage companies
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Greensleaves on Aug 28, 2007 5:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The signs intrude in our lives and sightlines. Even in the country you can hardly escape from McDonald signs.
As a bonus, maybe the toned down advertising may slow down the consumerism a bit, so we can all live simpler and greener and more beautiful lives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Half-Naked Hot Chicks and Beer: The Sexist Guyland of the Super Bowl Beer Commercial
Can Obama and Dems Overcome the Right's Talk Radio Monopoly?
Why We're Addicted to Disaster Porn




