COMMENTS: 56
Media Climate Pushes Brides to Say 'I Do' to Lavish Wedding Spending
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.
Where once a bride could design a memorable day using an etiquette guide and a good caterer, the specialized wedding media of today feed a $161 billion per year industry enriched at the expense of many of the people it purports to serve.
While recommending that their readers work from a budget, at the same time wedding media flood them with glossy images of apparel (one tip: spring for a dress with a glamorous back because guests will be looking at it throughout the ceremony) and exotic locations for "destination" weddings, which are costly for guests as well as the couple, but are up five-fold in 10 years.
The average cost of a wedding has nearly doubled since 1990 to $28,000, according to the American Wedding Study 2006 conducted by the Conde Nast Bridal Group, publisher of Brides, Modern Bride and Elegant Bride magazines.
What the glossy magazines don't point out is the pointlessness of such expenditures. As they soar into wedded bliss, some couples simultaneously sink themselves into debt. Only 30 percent of brides' parents still foot the bill. More than a third of marrying couples admit spending more than they had planned, according to the American Wedding Study.
And since finances have long been the No. 1 point of conflict for couples, confronting a stack of bills on their return from the Disney World destination wedding is not a good way to begin a loving partnership.
The money spent on nuptial extravaganzas could be better used as a big chunk of the down payment on a starter home, with some funds reserved to support local arts, culture and community needs.
Peeking Behind the Tulle Curtain
In a book that has been compared to Jessica Mitford's "The American Way of Death," a 1963 classic on the excesses of U.S. funeral rites, New Yorker staff writer Rebecca Mead deconstructs the wedding business in One Perfect Day: The Selling of the American Wedding, published by Penguin in May.
She discusses aspects of what Conde Nast calls "the wedding lifecycle" that its bridal magazines are apt to ignore. One stage of the process, for instance, could be Chinese sweatshops where gowns sold in the United States are made by workers who sleep eight to a room and earn 30 cents an hour. Another stage is the overspending by brides and their relatives as they get caught up in status-conscious anxiety.
Mead's book has attracted deserved attention from outlets such asUSA Today, the Columbus Dispatch, the Christian Science Monitor, the International Herald Tribune and ABC's Good Morning America. But it's a lonely outpost in a crush of commercial messages in traditional and new bridal media, including cable TV.
"Get Married" debuted in April on the WE cable network and then on Lifetime and, of course, has a companion Web site. The show has a "look and book" segment, essentially an infomercial, featuring honeymoon and wedding resorts with an 800 telephone number so viewers can book on the spot.
There's a "celebrity wedding" segment on both the show and the Web site where lots of brides-to-be can experience vicarious thrills. When I visited the site, the "get married" poll asked, "Which celebrity couples nuptials was the most surprising?" Among the pairings were Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher, Heidi Klum and Seal. If you register at the site, you can also view "touching details" from celebrity romances. Blecch.
What the site and many like it, such as The Knot, do is collect information from site visitors for merchandising purposes and to encourage them to buy from their online stores.
Advertising bonanzas
Newspapers have long capitalized on weddings, by creating special sections that attract advertising from florists, caterers, party venues and bridal shops.
In its pitch to advertisers to buy space in weddings sections to be published three times throughout 2007, the Washington Post said, "Imagine our readers planning the perfect wedding without first-rate ideas and information. Never! 'Weddings,' a very special advertising section in the Washington Post Magazine, is devoted to inspiring and guiding Washington brides. This resource will help make their day dazzling. Join us for the excitement."
Regional publishing companies have blended ideas from daily newspapers like the Post and national bridal titles to create regional bridal magazines. Hawthorn Publications launched Gala Weddings magazine last fall for brides-to-be in New England, who "are often paralyzed by uncertainty while making the first major planning decisions," says editor in chief Cori Russell.
Russell's comment typifies much of the media content targeting prospective brides. It tends to patronize them, as if they haven't the first clue on how to plan a party and need detailed accounts of glamorous celebrity weddings to give them ideas.
The "princess" mentality innocently enjoyed by little girls reaches its apex in most media for brides. With articles such as "50 must-take wedding photos," "Find the perfect dress," and "See the hairstyles that made our best-tressed list," bridal media set them on a course to be queens for a day, with apparently endless amounts of money to shower on themselves and far from the double-shift realities that face them as actual married women.
Green Wedding Bliss
Showing more respect for prospective brides (and to Planet Earth) is Portovert Magazine, rolled out online at the beginning of 2007 with advice for the environmentally and socially responsible. "Wed with the world in mind," urged its Web site in a promotion for World Environment Day.
The site encourages visitors to have a more intimate wedding, not a big bash; use natural textiles from fair-trade sources; print invitations on recycled paper; and keep the wedding close to home to reduce the carbon emissions released by guest travel and lodging. And rather than promoting a gas-guzzling stretch limo for the wedding party, Portovert will tell you how to purchase a carbon offset that will fund investments in renewable energy.
Brides magazine published its first major feature on green weddings in its February-March issue, but neither it nor its competitors are liable to continue showcasing simpler, eco-friendly weddings over the splashy blowouts that are its, and its advertisers', bread and butter.
Portovert's sustainable philosophy is wide in scope: financially, emotionally and ecologically. But right now such weddings are just a fraction of the one-million-plus weddings that take place in the United States each year. If their go-green message starts catching on in a big way, they're sure to leave mainstream bridal media seeing red.
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ankhet on Aug 6, 2007 2:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The traditional fantasy of matrimony I magnanimously accept, but the accompanying waste...
Posted by: Pat Kittle
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mombot on Aug 6, 2007 3:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lizmv on Aug 6, 2007 4:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having just attended a low budget backyard wedding, I can tell you that it is possible to have a beautiful wedding with 100 guests for less than $3000. I didn't hear a single guest whining that it wasn't good enough. What made it beautiful was the sense of community everyone felt as we gathered to celebrate the young couple's next step in their journey through life.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Don't forget that this 'phenomena' is also prevalent in the 'developing world'. The Western
Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Just say NO
Posted by: Leman
» A real-world scenario
Posted by: Leman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karyse on Aug 6, 2007 4:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps this is one area where the underclasses and working poor have it right -- just live together until you don't want to anymore, or if the decision is made to "tie the knot" make an appointment with the justice of the peace.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Ironic....
Posted by: Libertine
Comments are closed-
Posted by: H_H on Aug 6, 2007 5:01 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And like a mindless piece on a chessboard, women are forced in a certain direction and simply have no way to help it. But if these creatures are mental invalids who can't make-up their own minds, why are they even allowed to vote?
No, really, answer this. How are we supposed to believe that women are totally capable of making their own decisions, but the media "pushes" them to want a lavish wedding? If a woman can't make-up her own mind about "her big day", then I don't see how we can know that "the media" didn't implant other ideas in their heads as well, "pushing" them to open savings accounts and brush their teeth and apply for law school?
Was Hillary Clinton "pushed" into her position by some unseen force? I don't see why we should dismiss that possibility. I hear she had a big wedding day, too.
Pathetic. As I have said many MANY times before, you can't have it both ways: proudly boast that women are "independent" with their own minds, yet every dumb thing they do is "teh Patriarchy's" fault.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It IS a little strange... but don't drag Hilllary into this!...
Posted by: defrag
» RE: It IS a little strange... but don't drag Hilllary into this!...DITTO
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» Yeah, you're right
Posted by: H_H
» Marketing Religious Traditions
Posted by: mazel
» RE: Marketing Religious Traditions
Posted by: Leman
» RE: PATHETIC!
Posted by: bluebirdella
Comments are closed-
Posted by: T.I.M. on Aug 6, 2007 5:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You don't need a destination wedding; you need a destination marriage, one that will really go the distance.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Aug 6, 2007 5:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: defrag on Aug 6, 2007 6:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since the modern wedding is all about the bride, there really isn't a need for a groom. Or indeed, for any male involvement whatsoever. Or any pseudo-religious component whatsoever.
We just need an updated version of the "Sweet Sixteen" party or Quinceanera, pushed up to the age of 29. Any 29 year old woman (make that GIRL) who wants one could order all her friends, co-workers & relatives to attend her party & give her presents. Many, many presents. She'll wear an outlandish white dress & put on a show.
And no messy divorce will follow!
"Veintenuevoanera"? That's the idea.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Part of what disturbs me most...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Aug 6, 2007 6:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Aug 6, 2007 6:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are millions of women for whom the ONLY time they'll ever be the center of attention, and made up as pretty as they can be, with everyone SAYING how pretty they are, how special, how angelic, how perfect, is on the bridal day. For a girl without stunning looks, education, or family capital to launch and assist her toward a life of recognition and sufficiency, many women settle for "one special day" when they are the celebrity. They know, at some level, that they will soon be overblown and faded with childrearing, and know (or believe) they have no special talent or gift, either.
But they CAN have one day in which everyone will bow to their wishes and make as much of them as can humanly be made. A day that will be photographed and filmed and remembered, and no one can take it away from her.
It's sad that we don't have a form of Quinceanera or Bat Mitzvah for all young women, or even debutante balls--some time and place to celebrate the flowering of young womanhood.
Would that we could recognize the worth and value of every young woman, instead of making it contingent upon marriage to an "appropriate" male.
I'm no fan of bridal narcissism, but one part of me has to sympathize with the human need to be recognized and "not fade away."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Biggest Day Of Her Life
Posted by: hagwind
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zooeyhall on Aug 6, 2007 6:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mom and Dad never forgot the depression years, very frugal all their lives. Mom passed-away a few years back, but I will never forget what she told one of the grandaughters. This girl was planning this huge wedding costing thousands, and working herself sick getting this big production ready. One day this bride-to-be was telling mom about oh how stressfull all this planning was, how much it was costing, what kind of dress to buy, etc. etc. My mom quietly told her: "Remember dear, money doesn't buy happiness. And this wedding is only a beginning, and not an end in itself."
Mom and Dad were married for 50 years exactly. My niece got divorced after 18 months.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Mom's advice to granddaughter
Posted by: messedup
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wireup on Aug 6, 2007 8:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first time was in our backyard, just for family, and it costs very little.
The second time we asked about 30 people to meet us at the local arboretum. We were married there and then returned to the house. I hired a local natural-foods caterer and for under $400 we had a huge quantity of the most FANTASTIC food and beautiful wedding cake. We asked people to dress as they pleased - it was summer and shorts were welcome - and NOT to bring presents. It was a really lovely wedding enjoyed by all who attended.
And, it didn't cost an arm or a leg!
Last - but not least - one can always go to city hall!
It is absolutely UNNECESSARY to spend a fortune to get married. This is done for the economic benefit of the wedding industry and has NOTHING to do with marriage.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I don't think it's JUST for the benefit of the wedding industry...
Posted by: mjabele
» RE: You CAN be married inexpensively!
Posted by: sarahbfine
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Trazom on Aug 6, 2007 9:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There used to be a time when money skills were taught in high school, but no longer. Ironically, that type of stuff seems to be relegated to the lower track kids, when it's really everyone who needs the skill.
Hint, if your wedding is going to cost $30,000 (and we're not even talking about the rings and/or vacation, are we?) and you're making $50,000/year and don't own a home, how are you going to pay that off? Is it worth sacrificing things like owning a home and having a child for just one day?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: IPFreeley on Aug 6, 2007 9:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With inflation around 3.5%, everything nearly doubles in price in 17 years. I don't think the American tradition of having large expensive weddings took off at the same time as grunge rock.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: xbj on Aug 6, 2007 9:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ezstevey on Aug 6, 2007 12:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm getting married next year and
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: I'm getting married next year and
Posted by: wireup
» RE: I'm getting married next year and
Posted by: hagwind
» you poor thing . . .
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
» RE: you poor thing . . .
Posted by: ezstevey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: faultroy on Aug 6, 2007 3:04 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have never heard a woman say: "You know, I'm an absolute idiot that has no self control, I take full responsibility for this mess." They are forever blaming everyone else--their parents, their husbands, their former husbands, their former boyfriends--food-- Bush, Cheney, the government, conservatives, Democrats, Republicans, the Religious Right--all of which happen to be male? Never mind the fact that there are 3 million more women voters than men, it is always these "the bad men."
No wonder American Women are considered: most contemptible, least deserving respect, totally lacking in class and functionally irrelevant by most other countries of the world.
The World sees that American Women want Rights and Privileges, but refuse to accept the responsibility that comes as a result of those rights.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Let's Place the Onus on the Real Culprit
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Let's Place the Onus on the Real Culprit
Posted by: skybluesky
» RE: Let's Place the Onus on the Real Culprit
Posted by: bluebirdella
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom on Aug 6, 2007 8:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been married for 22 years. I ordered my simple dress from the JC Penney catalog, my friends from school sang, and my reception was cake and punch in the church basement. While it was nice, no one was impressed by the wedding, but they're very impressed with our marriage.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FDPN on Aug 6, 2007 10:21 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These articles keep popping up on Alternet and I have to wonder why. What is Alternet's agenda here? Who is driving their attack on the wedding industry?
Feminists? If feminists are against the bridal industry, could someone please explain why rather than posting these emotionally charged attack articles?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Possibly getting clueless morons to realize that materialism does not equal happiness?
Posted by: xbj
» Ok. I happen to agree with your statement, but that is not an answer to my question. nm
Posted by: FDPN
» RE: What is Alternet's agenda?
Posted by: skybluesky
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ArtemInox on Aug 7, 2007 7:46 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole concept of two people expecting to really truly love each other the rest of their lives, to me is just unrealistic and tragically sad. Because some of the noblest, most sublime feelings an individual can feel toward another are almost always doomed to fail and fall apart over time. So let the people that buy into this bullshit have their day, why not? Maybe the lavish, extravagant wedding is the closest they can come to expressing these feelings in a tangible way. This probably made a lot more sense when the average lifetime wasn't all that long. And if you think about all the weddings you have been to that had marriages not lasting, didnt you KNOW or at least have an inkling that it was going to end up that way?
Maybe it just doesn't make sense to get married anymore in the context of our times, or maybe its just another sign of our decaying, decrepit, bankrupt culture.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Whoa...
Posted by: mjabele
» RE: Whoa...
Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Aug 7, 2007 4:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He/She wants to spend ALL your money on 3 tonnes of frippery for bimbos, then DUMP THEM!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sarahbfine on Aug 11, 2007 4:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At my store, we encourage people to stay within their budget, and are more than happy to show invitations on recycled paper, especially recycled cotton paper, but it's not always inexpensive. "It aint easy being green."
As for the bridal magazines, get real, who would pay 6 or 7 (or 10!) bucks to see pictures of a "normal" wedding? And think of all the "women's magazines" that have headlines of the latest diet on the cover, over the picture of chocolate cake. What do you expect? Magazines do what sells.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Weddings can be affordable...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Artemis3 on Aug 12, 2007 6:39 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lavish weddings do not = happy married life.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Aug 13, 2007 9:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the self-indulgence of throwing a temper tantrum on the multiple thousand dollar dresses & having the spectacle photo-documented.
can you say SPOILED little bitches?
honestly: how can one expect to start a marriage full of disappointments, compromises & challenges if a BrideZilla takes MONTHS to focus on getting EVERYTHING she wants & putting people in deep debt?
its like shooting yourself in the foot, isn't it?
months spent throwing tantrums, crying jags, foot stomping & petulant "I want so I'll have" scenes... is NOT conducive to creating a mature "Marriage is a Loving Friendship in the Face of Life" attitude.
Good luck.
No wonder some of these BitchMothers with Strollers demand the sidewalk... its just another opportunity to be demanding & "More Woman Than Thou" because they signed on to reproduce...
"I HAVE RESPONSIBILITIES!! GET OUT OF MY WAY, I'm A BREEDER!
you can't understand what I GO THROUGH"...
Have you NOTICED the ages of some of these little rajas in strollers?
I've seen kids as old as EIGHT in those things.
gotta wonder what those kids are learning about entitlement & personal effort.
funny, there are millions of women internationally who wouldn't even *recognize* what our society declares 'essential' to qualitative living...
"You can't always get what you WANT"
Spread Love...
... but wear the Glove!
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Erick Erickson Is the New CNN Go-to Bigot, Misogynist and Homophobe
Let's Drop the Good Guys vs. Bad Guys Talk, We Need to Grow Up as a Species
Racist Right-Wing Shock Jock Who Threatened the Lives of Judges Beats Jail Rap for Second Time




