Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Fox and CBS Refuse To Air Condom Ads

By Courtney E. Martin, AlterNet. Posted July 12, 2007.


It is inexcusable that television networks, one of the best public sites for widespread education about safer sex, is acting coy at the cost of young women's fullest lives.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The first time I met 23-year-old Marvelyn Brown at a Washington, D.C., luncheon celebrating young women's achievements, she reached for her lemonade and I noticed a tiny red ribbon tattooed on her hand. Marvelyn and I got to talking, and I learned that she had been diagnosed with HIV at the age of 19. She contracted it from unprotected sex with a boy she described as "prince charming" back in her hometown of Nashville, Tenn. Her mother, whose only attempt at sex education was "just don't get pregnant," begged Marvelyn to tell everyone she had cancer instead.

I thought of Marvelyn when I heard that Fox and CBS networks recently refused to broadcast condom advertisements. Had they somehow missed the memo that there are 19 million new cases of sexually transmitted diseases (STD) each year or that HIV and AIDS are now the leading cause of death among black women between the ages of 25 and 34?

Marvelyn, as scrappy as she is beautiful, eventually made her way to New York City and became a spokesperson for AIDS awareness. She has been on BET, MTV, and even sat on the all holy couch of Oprah. She told me, "The weird thing is that if I hadn't gotten HIV, I think I would have ended up like so many of the girls in my hometown -- pining for a man and raising babies on welfare."

In fact, the networks are OK with playing a role in preventing fates like Marvelyn's, but not those of thousands of teen girls pregnant with babies instead of their own potential. According to The New York Times, FOX's decision was based on their policy that condom ads "must stress health-related issues rather than the prevention of pregnancy." In other words, TV execs feel entitled to glorify sex, but not educate viewers about the realities of it.

This is not just about network skittishness over abortion politics. It's not even about reproductive choices and education more broadly. This is about the battle over who controls women's lives.

When women have the power to choose when they conceive, they also have the power to lead healthier, more effective and ethical lives. They have an essential tool to be contentious about where they put their energy, how they forward their causes and careers, and when, if they are so inclined, they bring a very wanted and valued baby into the world. Birth control is nothing less than the key to composing a fulfilling, female life in the 21st century.

Take Marvelyn. HIV positive and only 23-years-old, she is discovering who she is away from home for the first time. She is making connections with the AIDS education community all over the world. She'll spend much of September on a fully-funded speaking tour in South Africa. Marvelyn may have the misfortune of having contracted HIV, but she is managing it with the help of dedicated doctors and advanced pharmaceutical therapies. And importantly, she is fulfilling what she sees as her divine purpose on earth -- to educate people about HIV and AIDS. Were she raising a young child, she would have never been able to follow this demanding path.

Marvelyn remembers being judged by women at home, women with babies born from unintended pregnancies, and she remembers thinking, "We reached in the same grab bag and pulled out different fates. I'm no worse than you." In fact, in some ways, I believe Marvelyn has it better. She hopes to one day have a child, but today, right now, she is free to discover more about herself and the world, and in the process, make it a better place.

Imagine the energies that are thwarted, the potential that is squandered, by teen girls who aren't educated about preventing unwanted pregnancy.

Approximately 750,000 American women between the ages of 15 and 19 get pregnant each year. Of course some of these young women come to adore and enjoy their roles as mothers, but they had the rest of their lives for that. The opportunity to be independent, focused on self-improvement and intellectual discovery, and career-driven without complications, has been lost.

It is inexcusable that television networks, one of the best public sites for widespread education about safer sex, is acting coy at the cost of these young women's fullest lives. Until all women understand their reproductive choices, none of us can be sure that we are benefiting from the full range of gifts -- intellectual, spiritual, and otherwise -- that one half of the population has to offer.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: media, fox, cbs, condoms

Courtney E. Martin is a writer, teacher and filmmaker living in Brooklyn. She is currently working on a book on her generation's obsession with food and fitness, Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters, which will be published by Free Press in spring of 2007. You can read more about her work at www.courtneyemartin.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
People have known since the dawn of time that sex equals babies
Posted by: White middleclass male on Jul 12, 2007 1:57 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imagine the energies that are thwarted, the potential that is squandered, by teen girls who aren't educated about preventing unwanted pregnancy.

When I was about six years old, my parents told me about sex, after I had asked where babies come from. Besides, we always need waitresses and maids.

The opportunity to be independent, focused on self-improvement and intellectual discovery, and career-driven without complications, has been lost.

No it has not. Go have an abortion. If you choose to listen to your priest, just remember, Jesus the magic sky monster does not make child support payments.

none of us can be sure that we are benefiting from the full range of gifts -- intellectual, spiritual, and otherwise -- that one half of the population has to offer.

Babies are a women’s burden. They have all the say on if the fetus gets aborted regardless of what the man wants, so they can bare the full burden of raising the child. Be happy if the “Baby-Daddy” pays the minimum amount of child support to keep him from becoming a criminal.


I’m sure there will be someone to call me irresponsible for that last comment but just remember, If the mother does not want the child, it goes in the dumpster behind the Planned Parenthood clinic. If the father does not want it…well that does not matter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» wrong Posted by: White middleclass male
» RE: wrong Posted by: georgiaorwell
» nope, uh uh. Posted by: frosty86
» RE: nope, uh uh. Posted by: White middleclass male
» A diatribe from funknjunk about his floppy cock Posted by: White middleclass male
» Tantrum? Posted by: suprmark
» RE: Tantrum? Posted by: imcnotu
» Better to be the king of an empty castle Posted by: White middleclass male
» RE: nope, uh uh. Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: nope, uh uh. Posted by: chomsky
Women - saints or sinners?
Posted by: georgiaorwell on Jul 12, 2007 2:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's so pathetic how puritanical and repressed American society is. We are still back in Dark Ages thinking about women. It's either-or at its sickest - women are only for procreation - right? Women are not really human, liberated creatures, who can go forth and actually make intelligent decisions about their own bodies - oh no, we need MALE politicians, Supreme Court MALE justices, a MALE Bush-appointed Health czar, MALE tv execs, etc., to cling to the concept that women should be cast in a certain mold (portrayed in red-neck Reug talk about family values as the men are involved in one sex scandal after another).

Women need to massively demonstrate in DC and condoms should be distributed EVERYWHERE. Planned Parenthood is working on a campaign about condoms, which I hope will be supported widely. I personally think Fox and CBS should be boycotted with their advertisers until they change their positions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Women - saints or sinners? Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Women - saints or sinners? Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Women - saints or sinners? Posted by: Ian MacLeod
2
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jul 12, 2007 4:21 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A bit cheesy and melodramatic.

Thousands of women would thrive and make the world a better place--like thousands of beautiful flowers blooming in the spring--if only those crooked TV networks would run some condom ads?

I'm all for calling the networks crooked, greedy, spineless, and so on, but let's try to keep it real, and not oversimplify things.

There's all this talk of "empowering" women or whatever, yet this article makes them out to be a bunch of airheads who know how to have sex, but don't know where babies come from unless they see condom ads on TV.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 2 Posted by: kelt65
R.V.
Posted by: RDVSR on Jul 12, 2007 5:17 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps the networks should tell Marvyn's story to warn young people about dangers of promiscous sex rather than sell them condoms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: .V. Posted by: davmills
» RE: .V. Posted by: InsertNameHere
» RE: .V. Posted by: suprmark
» well, thats only if you define... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» when in doubt, pull it out Posted by: treesarelove
» Agreed....but Posted by: gellero
» Woman power WITH each other not over Posted by: liberal is good
» Women refuse to work together. Posted by: White middleclass male
» RE: Women refuse to work together. Posted by: helenwheels
Fox is Murdoch
Posted by: mr.ed on Jul 12, 2007 5:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fox is Murdoch. Does that explain anything? CBS's audience is basically too old to have sex, anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

contraceptive ads on TV
Posted by: vasumurti on Jul 12, 2007 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since "All in the Family" broke down barriers and made it acceptable to talk about sex on television, you'd think advertisers would have caught up! But they haven't. When AIDS first started getting attention in the '80s, there were ads featuring Surgeon General C. Everett Koop recommending condom usage. And there have been ads for the Today sponge and Orth-Tri-Cyclene (sp?), but contraceptive ads have not become mainstream...even on cable TV.

Network executives fear contraceptive ads might offend some viewers, but I think that's crap. Television dramas, soaps, etc. regularly show characters jumping into bed together, and we are routinely bombarded with ads for tampons, laxatives, diapers, etc.

Contraceptive ads can be tastefully made: I've seen newspaper ads for contaception in India, of all places, which is much more sexually conservative than the U.S. And this was over 25 years ago!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pretty sad
Posted by: hangman on Jul 12, 2007 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
its pretty sad that TV stations can't comprehend the need to promote condoms as a life saving tool, yet they can make tonnes of money from sensationalizing the wars and weapons and prefer that a woman get pregnant instead of empower her to have the tools to protect herself and live a fuller life.

If the TV stations had any brains or a heart they would be the first to step up to the plate and show condom ads and help empower the young people to take care of themselves and show they care about others.
Stop being afraid of the condom, its here to help save our lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No surprise
Posted by: edraven on Jul 12, 2007 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that Fox and CBS don't care about the death of black women.

But, I hope that someday we can be honest about sex and not feel so guilty that we view a natural act as "dirty." The churches of the world should be ashamed.

Ed Graham

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No surprise Posted by: willymack
WHY ONLY NETWORKS
Posted by: gellero on Jul 12, 2007 10:20 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We know the networks are behind the times........so the real question is why BET & MTV don't run the ads since they are the ones with the targeted audience. Also.....most supermarkets and drug chains have condoms easially accessable in the aisles..........you'd have to be a pretty stupid teenager to not know what they're used for. Even if your parents didn't teach you anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHY ONLY NETWORKS Posted by: suprmark
Meanwhile
Posted by: helenwheels on Jul 12, 2007 10:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fox, CNN, etc. all have absolutely NO problem running ads for PENIS PILLS, commercials which warn you to get to an emergency if you have an ERECTION lasting longer than 4 HOURS called PRIAPISM!!! Aren't these commercials basically saying go out and screw yourselves silly? Why then is a CONDOM a problem? What a f'ed up society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't let the children find out...
Posted by: Crazy H on Jul 12, 2007 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our moral values are in sad decline. Now our schools are telling children about safe driving. They're actually teaching them how to use seat belts. You might as well give them a license to drive. A green light to go out and drive irresponsibly.

The liberals would have you believe that just because many school-age children have fully functional automobiles, that they should be taught how to use them. Nothing could be further from the truth -- the only sure way to prevent accidents is to abstain from driving altogether.

The facts are irrefutable -- a hundred years ago, not one school in America was teaching driver's ed, and not a single child was killed in a car wreck. Today, with drivers' ed running rampant through our schools, thousands are killed every year. The conclusion is obvious.

And that's why I voted for Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't let the children find out... Posted by: walldodger1969
Why watch the TV anyway? It's filled with rightwing bullshit anyway.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 12, 2007 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's always the Internet for invaluable information anyday.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a fascist state...
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jul 12, 2007 1:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... will have it's ideologically controlled media.

Ask yourself; why are extremist ideas about sex and condoms inflicted upon the mainstream media? I mean, the Catholic Church isn't behind this one... think about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE TRAGEDY OF TV NETWORKS AS BUSINESSES ONLY
Posted by: drricklippin on Jul 12, 2007 4:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks Courtney Martin-

Most major TV networks have tragically become only businesses. (although some competition with some actual human values and ethics is nipping at their heels)

I believe to structure newsreporting especially as a business only is, at best unprofessional, and at worst immoral. Truth should not be for sale. And through your article you reveal the hypocrisy of major TV networks who are only profit driven.

When TV networks return to some professional roots we will see its awesome power to address important public health issues as you raise here.

What about PBS? Do they help with these issues?

Be Well,

Dr. Rick Lippin
htp://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't both these stations air fairly explicit viagra ads?
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Jul 12, 2007 4:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very strange that they will promote sex but not the means to make it safe. Oh well, I guess more AIDS = more sales of AIDS drugs by the big pharmaceutical companies. And more unwanted, uneducated babies to grow into minimum-wage workers. More money to be made by big business all around.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» yep and they'll Posted by: Krain61
Misogynists of the world unite
Posted by: may261989 on Jul 12, 2007 4:45 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boy, its amazing how these types of articles bring out the hot headed women haters of the world.
What is it with you guys? Have you been burned so bad by a woman that you have decided to hate them till you die.

This article is not about us blokes being victims of evil slutty women, its about the most vulnerable women in society being deprived of much needed contraceptive education.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Misogynists of the world unite Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Misogynists of the world unite Posted by: Logic's Edge
OK...
Posted by: Mojoe on Jul 12, 2007 11:37 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I grew up in a conservative Catholic area and we were taught about condoms in 8th grade... again in 9th grade... you betcha, 10th grade too. Lack of condom awareness isn't the problem, lack of the understanding is. Guys are told, "If you want to go to college and party your ass of, don't get a girl pregnant. Condoms can be bought in the pharmacy aisle." Girls are told, "Guys will tell you anything to get you into bed. Don't fall for it, guys are pigs. Condoms can be bought in the pharmacy aisle."

Yet, teenage girls still get STD's and still get pregnant. What is the problem?

ALCOHOL! Dead fucking serious. 95% of the girls I know that are not on birth control would not have sex without a condom under any circumstance... till they're drunk. And no surprise, where there are drunk girls, there are horny guys lookin' to get laid.

I still think the condoms thing should be aired.

But I'll get a big ONE for this post just because I don't talk about how Bush is horrible, conservatives are bible-thumpers, and everything else about America is wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OK... Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: OK... Posted by: EJ
» RE: OK... Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: OK... Posted by: Blade
» RE: OK... *BATTING A 5 SO FAR* Posted by: maribelle
» RE: OK... Posted by: EJ
» RE: OK... Posted by: Ian MacLeod
impeachment
Posted by: gsaephanh on Jul 13, 2007 1:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call in your vote TODAY for impeaching Bush and Cheney at this number: 202-225-0100

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office is taking calls voting for Impeachment of Bush/Cheney at 202-225-0100. PLEASE CALL TODAY. At the toll free capitol switchboard #s below, you can also call your particular district’s congressional representative to insist that they support impeachment for Cheney. E.g., for Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s H Res 333 for Cheney; please say:

“In addition to supporting Kucinich’s bill H Res 333, I would also support a similar Impeachment Resolution against Bush, especially after the disgraceful Scooter Libby sentence “commuting” and the following issues: wiretapping, torture, numerous 9/11 intelligence misrepresentations, the continued occupation of Iraq, gross negligence during Hurrican Katrina, the Valerie Plame CIA leak, […list your other grounds…] ..”[see resolutions on tab #2 for other grounds for impeachment]).

LANIC requests that Americans call today…Not tomorrow or next week. Every call adds to the extraordinary grasswoots and nationwide movement’s pressures on House Speaker Pelosi to act now .before further innocent lives are lost in Iraq and elsewhere. Last week 28 Americans lost their lives. Over the July 4, 2007 weekend over 400 Iraqis lost their lives…

SEND MAIL TO HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI: Attn: Nancy Pelosi, House Representative/Speaker of the House, 235 Cannon H.O.B., Washington, DC 20515 ; Pelosi’s Fax # 202 225-8259

Pelosi’s e-mail address :

Americanvoices@mail.house.gov

CC her at: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

Please send her a pro-impeachment email and a specific call to endorse H Res 333. Note: On Saturdays/Sundays, Pelosi’s office has a comment line at which you can leave a voicemail. Your message will be transcribed and relayed to her. Please do encourage your family/friends to contact the same number. Refer them to www.bcimpeach.com for the actual telephone #s & contact info.

Find out who your Congressional representative is and call that person. For toll free numbers to your Congress rep: (800) 828 – 0498; (800) 459 – 1887; or (866) 340 – 9281. You will be connected once you name your congress person. The staff aid should take detailed notes and provided to the Congressional representative.

Final Note: Please say “I support Impeachment based on ____. I’d like to know where “[representative name]” stands on this issue.” Let’s strike while the Libby fury keeps the iron hot! Please call and Act Now!

PLEASE ALSO CONTACT THESE KEY CONGRESSIONAL REPS RE IMPEACHMENT:
Representative Capitol Phone Capitol Fax
Howard Berman 202-225-4695 202-225-3196
& 818-944-7200 818-994-1050

MAILING ADDRESS FOR BERMAN
Congressman Howard L. Berman
14546 Hamlin Street, Suite 202
Van Nuys, CA 91411

Henry Waxman 202-225-3976 202-225-4099
Loreta Sanchez 202 225-2965 202-225-5859
D. Watson 202 225-7084 202-225-2422
LindaSanchez 202 225-6676 202-226-1012
L. Solis 202 225-5464 202-225-5467
A. G. Eshoo 202 225-8104 202-225-8890
L. Roybal/Allard 202 225-1766 202-225-0350

http://www.bcimpeach.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: impeachment Posted by: EJ
» RE: impeachment Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» RE: impeachment Posted by: Mojoe
Impeach??
Posted by: gellero on Jul 13, 2007 3:00 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Prez has the right of Pardon, for any reason whatsoever. Read the Constitution sometime. End of story. This effort will just indicate to our enemies (yes, they are out there) the weakness of our democracy. Even if the Dems win the White House, they will never pull out of Iraq. You should fear suitcase nuclear weapons. The Islamists ARE our enemies. All the Democrats' pablum and posturing is meaningless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Impeach?? Posted by: EJ
» RE: Impeach?? Posted by: Ian MacLeod
» Is Macleod serious?? Posted by: gellero
» RE: Impeach?? Posted by: Krain61
» Yes Impeach Posted by: Krain61
You're missing the other half
Posted by: desiloo on Jul 15, 2007 10:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shouldn't sex education and awareness be just as crucial for men as it is for women? While I don't in any way support our choices being restricted even further, I believe that sex is a choice that involves two people. The decision to use a condom as a means for birth control/STD prevention should be a mutual one. I feel that this is not so much a women's issue as it is a reflection of an overly conservative culture that insists on keeping us in the puritanical era.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pregnancy Posted by: gellero
Birth Control is not good if you want to keep a standing Army
Posted by: Krain61 on Jul 17, 2007 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was reading someone talking about the beginning of time and another correcting that
person but who really gives a shit about that we know in this day and age that sex can
make babies.Why all the BS. Bottom line is there is a time where abortion is right but
when there are people getting one almost every year for 5 or 6 plus years that's insane.
I know because my little slut sister did that and it's then I feel abortion is wrong.
She kept one kid gave a kid away and kept the next. Seeing her now if I used her for a
example I would say abortion is a good thing.
I'm totally against it but I don't think our Goverment should but in a womans right to it.
Yea I know I'm talking in circles and should be a politician.
We have a constitution that should protect our rights and it's that reason above all I think
it should be up to the woman but at the same time if that is only her decision then a man
shouldn't be held to pay child support if he doesn't have full rights as the woman does to
raise that child..."shared parenting" He shouldn't have to pay anymore than she does
because she willing gave just as much to being pregnet as he did "unless rape was the case"
Alot of people have a one sided veiw on this but there are always three sides
to every story. your side there side and the truth.
Which you take is you side but not maybe the right side.
I helped make 3 kids and raised them till there ripe old age of 18 and still helping them.
But that's me and that doesn't mean every man should be denied raising his but only paying
the price.We need to get our ducks in order and get serious about educating our kids
on this and pay more attention to them as kids. Since most families have both parents
working we have no freaken clue what they do. We stick them in front of a TV and let
corporate America which is our government raise them to be morons who care more about
high priced shoes ,cell phones,vidio game and American Idol and who got a hair cut.
They "the government" don't want birth control so they will aways have a standing army
and drones to buy goods.Yep yep yep that's my story and I'm sticking to it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement