Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

CNN's Lou Dobbs Defends Claim That Illegal Immigrants Are Bringing Leprosy to America

By Brian J. Levy, Media Matters for America. Posted May 14, 2007.


Citing a debunked study in a right-wing journal, Lou Dobbs' show claimed that leprosy has increased in America as a result of "unscreened illegal immigration primarily from Southeast Asia" -- and he's not backing down.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg


During a CBS News interview with correspondent Lesley Stahl, which aired on the May 6 edition of CBS' 60 Minutes, CNN host and CBS Early Show special contributor Lou Dobbs defended CNN correspondent Christine Romans' citation -- initially made on the April 14, 2005, edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight -- of the false claims that "there were about 900 cases of leprosy [in the United States] for 40 years," and that "[t]here have been 7,000 in the past three years." The day after the 60 Minutes interview, during the May 7 edition of Lou Dobbs Tonight, Dobbs and Romans again defended the claims, with Romans attributing them to the late "Dr. Madeleine Cosman" (who did not have a medical degree but, rather, a Ph.D. in English and comparative literature). In fact, according to the National Hansen's Disease Program (NHDP) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), there have been just 431 reported cases of Hansen's disease, or leprosy, over the "past three years." The NHDP reported 8,490 cases of Hansen's disease from 1966 to 2005, as compared with Cosman's claim in a 2005 article that "in 40 years ... 900 people were afflicted." Cosman appears to have derived her false claim by misinterpreting a February 18, 2003, New York Times article.



At the end of the 60 Minutes profile, Stahl noted that "[w]hile we were talking to Dobbs, unbeknownst to us, he was talking to CBS News and has now joined The Early Show as a weekly commentator." CBS announced that it was hiring Dobbs as a special contributor to CBS' The Early Show on April 3. On May 7, CBS News Public Eye editor Brian Montopoli called Stahl's disclosure the "most awkward moment by far in last night's '60 Minutes' " because "Stahl had just spent part of the segment questioning Dobbs' journalistic credentials," though Montopoli did not go into the issue of the leprosy statistics.



During the May 7 edition of Lou Dobbs Tonight, Romans stated, "We don't make up numbers here," adding that she was quoting the "7,000 cases of leprosy" statistic from an article "in The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons" by "Dr. Madeleine Cosman, a respected medical lawyer and medical historian." Romans was apparently referring to Cosman's article in the Spring 2005 issue of the Journal, headlined "Illegal Aliens and American Medicine."



Wall Street Journal columnist Carl Bialik wrote on his blog, The Numbers Guy, that Cosman cited the 2003 New York Times article in her Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons article to justify her claim about the number of leprosy cases. But the Times article appeared to be discussing existing cases of the number of people with leprosy, and not occurrences "in the last three years" as Cosman wrote. The Times article compared the "900 recorded cases in the United States 40 years ago" with "today," in which "more than 7,000 people have leprosy." Cosman's use of the phrase "in the last three years" appears to refer to the statistic of 7,000 infected with Hansen's disease three years prior to the publication of Cosman's article. Bialik added that he contacted CNN about Roman's misleading citation:




In response to my inquiry about whether Ms. Romans used the leprosy numbers improperly, Mr. Dobbs said through a CNN spokeswoman, "Christine Romans's comments reflected what Dr. Cosman had said: That the number of active and current cases of leprosy had risen to and remained at more than 7,000 for the past three years as a result of improved reporting and unscreened illegal immigration primarily from Southeast Asia."

As the weblog Think Progress noted, during the 60 Minutes segment, Stahl noted Romans' claim "that there have been 7,000 cases of leprosy in the U.S. in the past three years," then said, "We checked that [number] and found a report issued by [HHS], saying 7,000 is the number of leprosy cases over the last 30 years, not the past three." She added: "[A]nd nobody knows how many of those cases involve illegal immigrants." When Stahl asked Dobbs about the inconsistency, Dobbs responded: "Well, I can tell you this. If we reported it, it's a fact." Colorado Media Matters and the Southern Poverty Law Center have both noted that the numbers Romans cited were false.



From the May 6 edition of CBS' 60 Minutes:




STAHL: One of the issues he tackles relentlessly is illegal immigration, and on that, his critics say, his advocacy can get in the way of the facts.



DOBBS: Tuberculosis, leprosy, malaria.



STAHL: Following a report on illegals carrying diseases into the U.S., one of the correspondents on his show, Christine Romans, told Dobbs that there have been 7,000 cases of leprosy in the U.S. in the past three years.



ROMANS: Leprosy, in this country.



DOBBS: Incredible.



STAHL: We checked that and found a report issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, saying 7,000 is the number of leprosy cases over the last 30 years, not the past three, and nobody knows how many of those cases involve illegal immigrants.

[end video clip]



STAHL: Now, we went to try and check that number, 7,000. We can't. Just so you know --



DOBBS: Well, I can tell you this. If we reported it, it's a fact.



STAHL: You can't tell me that. You did report it --



DOBBS: Well, no, I just did.



STAHL: How can you guarantee that to me?



DOBBS: Because I'm the managing editor, and that's the way we do business. We don't make up numbers, Lesley. Do we?



[...]



STAHL: While we were talking to Dobbs, unbeknownst to us, he was talking to CBS News and has now joined The Early Show as a weekly commentator.



From the May 7 edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight:



DOBBS: And there was a question about some of your comments, Christine. Following one of your reports, I told Leslie Stahl, "We don't make up numbers." And I will tell everybody here again tonight, I stand 100 percent behind what you said.



ROMANS: That's right, Lou. We don't make up numbers here. This is what we reported.



We reported: "It's interesting, because the woman in our piece told us that there were about 900 cases of leprosy for 40 years. There have been 7,000 in the past three years. Leprosy in this country."



I was quoting Dr. Madeleine Cosman, a respected medical lawyer and medical historian. Writing in The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, she said: "Hansen's disease" -- that's the other modern name, I guess, for leprosy -- "Hansen's disease was so rare in America that in 40 years only 900 people were afflicted. Suddenly, in the past three years America has more than 7,000 cases of leprosy" -- Lou.



DOBBS: It's remarkable that this -- whatever, confusion or confoundment over 7,000 cases. They actually keep a registry of cases of leprosy. And the fact that it rose was because of -- one assumes because we don't know for sure -- but two basic influences: unscreened illegal immigrants coming into this country primarily from South Asia, and the -- secondly, far better reporting.



ROMANS: That's what Dr. Cosman told us, Lou.



DOBBS: And, you know, in talking with a number of people, it's also very clear, no one knows, but nearly everyone suspects, there are far more cases of that. It is also, I think, interesting, and I think important to say, one of the reasons we screen people coming into this country is to deal with communicable diseases like leprosy, tuberculosis. The fact is, if we would just screen successfully, all of those diseases can be treated effectively, efficiently, and relatively quickly.



ROMANS: And that's why we raised the question in the first place, asking some tough questions about this. And, you know, 7,000 cases -- active cases of leprosy -- by no means is 11 million, as [Southern Poverty Law Center Intelligence Project director] Mark Potok suggested.





DOBBS: But you can't say that to people so interested in the truth, as Mr. Potok obviously isn't.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: leprosy, lou dobbs immigration

Brian J. Levy is a member of the Research Department at Media Matters for America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
past participle of "rise"
Posted by: ZPaul on May 14, 2007 12:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry to make this comment, but since it´s at the beginning of the article I feel I must: The only past partiple I´ve ever used for "rise" is "risen". I am familiar with "raised", but --"rised"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course...
Posted by: ZPaul on May 14, 2007 12:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, it might just be a typographical error, like the one I just made above in spelling "participle" ;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Of course...there have always been sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
These "Studies" are getting dubunked all the time.. Let's fix these idiots.
Posted by: Rolomax on May 14, 2007 1:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For instance, take a look at the University of Texas 'Study' on credit ratings and insurance rates..

The study is pretty much Bogus, but insurance companies of all types are using it to keep laws, enacted by previous conservative goverment house reps/senators, still in effect Today.

http://www.insurancescored.com/
and the people speak:
http://www.insurancescored.com/stories.htm

Insurance premiums going up?? That's why. Check the (bullshit) UT Study and then look at the Center for Economic Justice analysis.

Is it helping the average american? No.

If you have bad credit or no credit, should you pay more for auto insurance? Does a credit rating affect your driving habits? I don't think so either. I call bullshit on trying to classify americans for better corporate profits. What's worse? These profits are required by law..

Sorry for getting a bit off topic, but these 'studies' are actually 'plans', IMHO.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How can illegal immigration be good for reporting medical problems?
Posted by: edith on May 14, 2007 1:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether or not Dobbs' staff misinterpreted the number of leprosy cases or not, the fact is that the indifferent attitude of the US govt towards massive illegal immigration can lead to persons suffering from communicable diseases entering the US without being accurately included in statistics. Moreover these people as Dobbs noted would likely not be treated, even for diseases for which there is treatment. There are two ways to handle this problem(if the advocates of open immigration even concede the entrance of diseased and untreated persons into the US is a problem): First, to crack down on employers of illegals, so that the incentive to sneak in the US, diseased or not, is lessened; and second, to legalize all illegal aliens in the US, so that hopefully, those with communicable diseases will come forward without fear of deportation. The latter solution of course makes a mockery of US laws in general, and sends a message to the millions of people who immigrated legally or who are waiting to immigrate legally that they are fools and idiots.

The gist of this article is to use Dobbs' possible misinterpretation of medical data to discredit the concept that a nation has the right to regulate immigration and to limit the number of legal immigrants. The limitation of immigrants is a principle acknowledged by almost every nation but the United States is expected to ignore its own laws and national interests, including public health interests so that the de facto open borders can be legalized. Surely, when millions of illegal persons enter the United States, some of them may have diseases like TB that have been controlled within the legal population. Thus disease becomes a Trojan Horse to both legalize all immigration and to pave the way for free health care for illegals who have paid not a penny into an insurance fund or tax revenues that finance medical care.

A crackdown on illegal employment and thus starving the illegals out is the only practical way to repel this invasion of national sovereignty. Of course many on this site deny that national sovereignty is a value worth preserving, or that if it exists, it should not exist for the US while it should exist for say, Cuba or Venezuela, just to take random examples that might quicken the heart of some posters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» DOBBS= O'REILLY? NO WAY!!! Posted by: poppop_schell
Gobbs and Gobbs of Dobbs
Posted by: Tom Degan on May 14, 2007 1:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I admire Lou Dobbs for his nightly exposures on his program of the unrelenting war that is at this moment being waged against the poor and middle class (a distinction that is getting harder and harder to make) by the First Fool and his appalling administration. And while I understand the passion he feels for what the influx of illegal immigrants is doing to the economic interests ot those classes (our class) he has, indeed gone off the deep end at times.

I don't think that he is the racist that some have painted him as being. The fact that his wife is a Mexican American would, I hope, put that assertion to rest. However, he should temper his argument with more substance and less emotion.

Other than Don Imus, no one in the main stream media has been more outspoken in their condemnation of this disgusting administration than Lou Dobbs. Imus is, for the time being anyway, history. We can't afford to lose Lou.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I just hope... / "proof" Posted by: Tom Degan
» Dobbs: Blame the Mexicans Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Dobbs: Blame the Mexicans Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Dobbs: Blame the Mexicans Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Dobbs: Blame the Mexicans Posted by: poppop_schell
I dont support him!
Posted by: Temporary on May 14, 2007 2:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I dont support Lou Bobbs or people like him! These people may be "illegals" but they work HARD in American businesses ! Just as much, and aynone else, so why shouldn't they also have the same rights? After all, thats what blacks civil rights were ALL ABOUT! Blacks in the southern states or South-Africa worked JUST AS HARD as anyone else, so naturally they also should have the same rights! And that label "illegal" doesent count it! After all, blacks were "subhumans" once, and it was perfectly official! Maybe it's the law, but if these people work here, that doesent make it RIGHT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I dont support him! Posted by: Rolomax
» False premise Posted by: dkm
» RE: I dont support him! Posted by: CatDad
» RE: I dont support him! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: I dont support him! Posted by: edith
» RE: I dont support him! Posted by: Tjaye
Illegals bring allot more than Leprosy
Posted by: Lesha on May 14, 2007 2:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America has enough of its own home grown disease's to worry about. Giving a open door policy to a population coming from a country with no health-care only compounds the problem. Given that we really don't know how many illegals are here (12 to 30 million), perhaps 7,000 cases is a kind number given that most of them are do not report themselves.


Besides Leprosy, here is a list of 5 other problems they bring:

1. An already dumb down population of people who little to no education (even by Mexico's standards) to combine with our already failed school system.

2. Illegal immigrants not only import low skilled workers, but also criminals who make up 30% of our prison population.

3. High risk drivers with no insurance to combine with somewhat horrible driving skills.

4. Immigrants who have very little common sense that perhaps they cannot afford the 3 to 4 babies they have (America has enough of these types of their own).

5. And lastly a population of people that sucks out more than they put into the system such as: Health-care and schooling.

America if it wanted to, could import immigrants from other countries with higher skills that would be more of a benefit than people from Mexico. Immigrants from that part of the world are the only people who seem to think they are owed something from a foreign country instead standing up to its own government/country in Mexico and abroad.

If this country is smart, they will keep best of these folks who are a benefit to this country and deport the rest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wow, You're On to Something... Posted by: grumble-bum
» RE: Wow, You're On to Something... Posted by: deltadancer
» HUH?!? Posted by: grumble-bum
» Baloney!!! Posted by: dkm
» RE: Baloney!!! Posted by: Lesha
» RE: Baloney!!! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Baloney!!! Posted by: purplelotus13
» RE: Baloney!!! Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Poppop so do you... Posted by: chaoslegs
» RE: Poppop so do you... Posted by: poppop_schell
» as an immigrant... Posted by: Laplandi
Media Matters is wrong, not Lou Dobbs.
Posted by: TheTruthSeeker on May 14, 2007 3:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On April 4, 2004, Media Matters for America monitored the “Imus in the Morning” broadcast that referred to the Rutgers University women's basketball team as "nappy-headed ho's."

Media Matters locked on the I-Man's stupid utterance, posted it and a video clip on the Internet, then sent out an immediate bulk emailing to individual members of the National Association of Black Journalists. Media Matters also notified Don Imus/CBS sponsors, who eventually canceled his program.

Liberty freedom-loving Americans should speak truth to power. And the truth is, Media Matters for America is an enemy of free speech. Think about that for a moment before you believe what it says about Lou Dobbs, a great patriot.


For the TRUTH about Iraq, Bush 43 and his treasonous neocon cabal, visit the following websites managed by U.S. war veterans opposed to the continuing occupation of Iraq.

King-George.biz (the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption)
OpTruth.org (Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America critical of Iraq War)
VAIW.org (Veterans Against Iraq War)
VoteVets.org (promotes candidates for Congress who are both Middle East vets and Iraq War critics)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hugh, give it a rest. Posted by: dkm
Leprosy is curable
Posted by: BlueStateBitch on May 14, 2007 3:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So big deal, a few immigrants are coming in with leprosy.

IT'S CURABLE, FOLKS. It's a bacterial disease, and there are antibiotics that will get rid of it. And it takes close contact with a leper to catch the disease.

You're in a lot more danger of getting hurt in a car accident, eating tainted food, or getting AIDS from unprotected sex, than you are of catching leprosy.

So if you're looking at this as a reason to get your panties in a twist about illegal immigration, find something a little more compelling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Leprosy is curable Posted by: phal4875
Lou Dobbs is a voice for the voiceless
Posted by: thinkverybig on May 14, 2007 3:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Lou Dobbs for all that you do in speaking up for those who don't have the media outlet to do so. I truly and sincerely THANK YOU. I also would like to applaud Tom Degan who posts a lot on this site, keep up the good.

Coming soon is "WeMustChange.org"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the usual
Posted by: karyse on May 14, 2007 3:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One would think that one of the jobs of a journalist would be to disseminate important information; that is to say, information that is pertinent to understanding an argument (bogus or not)

Contrary to the whole leper conlony thing:
1) Hanson's disease is not highly contagious
2).... oh hell, I'll just give it to you as the WHO does
# PB patients treated with MDT are cured within six months;
# MB patients treated with MDT are cured within 12 months;
# Patients are no longer infectious to others after the first dose of MDT. In other words, transmission of leprosy is interrupted;
# There are virtually no relapses, i.e. recurrences of the disease after treatment is completed;
# No resistance of the bacillus to MDT has been detected;

see http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs101/en/

It annoys the hell out of me that I have to do my own research on this. Have journalists just gotten lazy or are they stupid?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the usual Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: the usual Posted by: Lauren
Universal
Posted by: Universal on May 14, 2007 4:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lou Dobbs, is an example of the failure of ideology. On the one hand, he makes trenchant, good arguments against the ideologists of free trade, but fails to challange class society, and class ideology, but on the other hand, he is a demagogue when it comes to immigrants sounding more like Hitler, who scapegoats the Jews for the failure of German capitalism, thus used and financed by German Corporate Fascism, the same way Dobbs is tolerated today by Amerikan Corporate Fascism, until it needs an even tougher, fascist version to keep the masses down on their knees.

The failure of ideology and placing them in historical context, to sort out their successes and fundamental failures so far, is why we have phony, false choices between two class parties, two class ideologies, none of whom represent the interests of the midddle and lower classes. I suggest people read my article, response, to Alternet's other article, related to this person, of whether the Third way exists, which is one separating issue from the one posed in it, whether the Third way proposed by class elites, is in fact an independent ideology, or just another class version, class ideology, which keeps us from understanding what strategies, ideologies move towards real democracy and socialism. Read my response in it, and then Lou Dobbs ideology becomes more explainable, though not acceptable. Also go to my website for how I arrived at my universal standard for all ideologies: www: univesalmanifesto.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm not a fan of Lou Dobbs, but I agree that diseases ARE entering...
Posted by: olderworker on May 14, 2007 4:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the country via unchecked immigration. The disease that concerns me the most is antibiotic resistant tuberculosis, which I understand is rampant in the former USSR and in several South American countries.
My source is the book, Mountains beyond Mountains by Tracy Kidder, hardly a right-wing conservative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Look at the overall picture
Posted by: lclark on May 14, 2007 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lou Dobbs reports on the wide spectrum of consequences of uncontrolled illegal migration.

One is the major impact on public services, health and education, paid for by taxpayers to benefit big business.

Another is wage suppression and wage reduction, as in the lower pay scale in the meat packing industry as citizens have been replaced by illegal migrants.

Another is the rise of gangs and crime, as in the 50,000 vehicles stolen from Phoenix each year.

Another is the wider spread of a veriety of diseases such as a resistent form of turburculosis.

To focus on one specific statistic involving one specific disease is disingenuous.

Altnet, and other 'progressive' promoters are anti-war, but still promote the agenda of the corportocracy, by supporting the agenda of business groups that support massive illegal migration for reasons that are not in the least humantiarian.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Look at the overall picture Posted by: poppop_schell
Stats
Posted by: gellero on May 14, 2007 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The largest out of US birth country for lepers is Mexico. It is NOT easily cureable by antibiotics.....it is an indolent infection, like TB. Stats from US govt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stats Posted by: poppop_schell
Okay, so he didn't make up the facts,
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on May 14, 2007 5:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he simply invented them.

For more reliable information:
http://www.leprosy.org/NEWSnews.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More reasons to have Health Care in America
Posted by: Aimee on May 14, 2007 5:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WOW! More New Horrific News. We cannot stop immigrants from coming to America - who would work in the slaughter houses? Dobbs? More reasons for Health Care here in America- for everyone.

Oh, Dobbs and his claim that leprosy is a result of "unscreened illegal immigration primarily from Southeast Asia" is just another distraction from what is really going on ... murder in Iraq, U.S. Tax dollars for Blackwaterusa.com contractors in Iraq, 9/11 Inside Job, etc .....

Cheers,
Aimee
DataOptions.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

much more concerned about TB
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on May 14, 2007 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
much more concerned about TB here in san francisco where the vast majority of immigrants think it's perfectly okay to hock loogies onto sidewalks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get rid of slaugherhouses and illegals at the same time!!
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on May 14, 2007 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get rid of slaugherhouses and illegals at the same time!!

Sick of immigrants coming here to work slaugherhouses? Well, I'm sick of slaughterhouses.

Look, most produce in this country (picked by illegals) is fed to cattle and pigs.

If we all become vegetarians and vegans, we won't need as many veggies picked because instead of feeding produce to animals to grow big fat cows and pigs, we can just feed ourselves the veggies instead.

No need for slaugherhouses, less jobs for illegal farmworkers.

Problem reduced.

GO VEGAN

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» for mex Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: for mex Posted by: Mex
» RE: for mex again Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: for mex again Posted by: Mex
Some of you are just Fu$%(ed
Posted by: The Big Raven on May 14, 2007 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lou Dobbs? Lou Dobbs? He just another media whore who will say anything for a buck and you sheep just suck all the bullshit up. Are you folks that hard up for a real americant hero? Ive seen plenty of people of all colors treat thier own race with utter contempt cause to accept each other as human beings is out of most americans reach. Racists the lot of ya go and watch cnn with the rest of the dumb sheep

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Some of you are just Fu$%(ed Posted by: poppop_schell
PS sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on May 14, 2007 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the time the climate at the Gulf was the only place in the Us conducive to the spread of leprosy, with global warming the belt in no doubt wider

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ATTACKING ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT LOU DOBBS: TACTICS USED
Posted by: poppop_schell on May 14, 2007 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps Dobbs is wrong on his interpretation of the leprosy statistics. IF he is, he needs to admit it, exlain his error and apologize.

A TACTIC, however, that is often used to "discredit" a "politial enemy" of the establishment is to find one error out of thousands of statistics used and play totally up that one error. This is intellectual dishonesty NOT matter which political persuasion you are.

Lastly, how degrading to say that Dobb's wife MAY be simply a servant/slave. Again, this tactic of innuedo is intellectually dishonest and immoral.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just wondering -
Posted by: symcokid on May 14, 2007 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if the Illegal Immigrants are bringing Leprosy infected blankets into this USofA in the same manner that the Illegal Invaders, (Europeans), of this "Great Turtle Island" did 500 years ago to the Native Indians? Also, how are the Mexicans immigrating to this US any more Illegal than our war in Iraq?

I often feel the Iraqi's are fighting so vehemently because they have studied the history of the United States, and don't intend to relinquish everything in the same manner as the Indigenous peoples were forced to here! What type of Leprosy are we spreading around the world now and have in the past, like Agent Orange and so on?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just wondering - Posted by: albrechtkrausse
All of you, ANTIMMIGRANTS MAKE ME SICK!
Posted by: Mex on May 14, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of bashing immigrants with either your nativism or xenophobic arguments you should ask yourself the next questions:

Why are they coming?
What can we do, the most powerful country in the world, to help other countries to improve their situation in order to stop immigration?
How can we be a better neighbor?
How can we improve NAFTA in order to make it more fair so Mexican farmers (in México) can compete in better circumstances with American farmers?
What can we do with immigrants already here in order to assimilate better to this country?

Those are some of the basics questions that you need to start with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Overpopulation benefits the economic elite
Posted by: DrGeneNelson on May 14, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Overall, Lou Dobbs has been relentless since around 2001 in exposing corruption by the corporate and political elites. It is clear that there is an effort to discredit Lou Dobbs that started with Leslie Stahl's 60 Minutes segment. If you look at Leslie's "reporting" on the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) you can get an idea about Leslie's "advocacy journalism."

The political and economic elites of the U.S. have been working hard to promote their so-called "open borders" policies, which are not supported by the middle class, nor the lower economic class. The elites have protrayed illegal immigration as just a means to supply inexpensive labor to agriculture. Actually, considerable numbers of high - skill laborers are working in the U.S. - mostly people whose high-skill work visas have expired, or who are working via the authority of a tourist or student visa. One estimate indicates that about 40% of the illegal alien population are high-skill workers. From the perspective of an employer, those high - skill illegal aliens have high profit margins!

The high-skill illegal immigrant population contributes to labor gluts that are further exacerbated by the bloated "government subsidy" of work visa programs such as H-1B. BTW, this characterization is from 2002 by the late Milton Friedman, a free-market advocate and Nobel economist. Milton recognized that such policies lead to labor gluts that yield desirable (from the employer perspective) wage supression. Lou Dobbs has ben sharply critical of such policies. Since he is endangering the profit margins of the economic elite, he is to be targeted, IMO.

I do not believe it is beneficial to most AlterNet readers to allow the trends that contribute to U.S. overpopulation to continue. Note that per http://www.NumbersUSA.com, the U.S. admits more immigrants than the next five nations combined. The economic elite apparently are satisfied with the Number 1 ranking of the U.S. for admitting immigrants. Recall that the last big Amnesty in 1986 was supposed to be "the last Amnesty." If this one passes, it will further embolden the economic elite.

For an interesting exercise, google on the phrases "forced repatriation" and "Great Depression" - you will learn that in U.S. history, there have been some very ugly periods when the excesses of the economic elite were corrected by middle-class workers. I believe that it is much better to prevent the illegal alien problem from getting worse. Folks like Bill Gates, III who became the "world's wealthiest man" in 1995 as a likely consequence of immigration programs are lobbying for more immigrants. (See Gates's 2 hour speech to the U.S. Senate on March 7, 2007.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scarcity, high rents, overcrowding=communicable diseases, esp tuberculosis
Posted by: plantland on May 14, 2007 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back in tenement days, tuberculosis and rickets were rampant.

When coughing spreads disease, it is dreadful that people who can only afford to live cheek to jowl get exposed.

I have seen Asian workers who seem to sleep in resturants. When they get sick, this would affect the patrons, especially the elderly. How free are these workers. What price our food?

We will have decent living conditions when we respect all men and when we quit producing more humans than the environment can educate, house, and feed.

Viva Mexico, and the decision to permit abortion. Mexican nationals have more access to birth control than Mexican illegals who come to the US and are patrons of the Catholic Church and immigration rights groups seeking to increase their numbers at any cost! The birth rate is lower in Mexico than it is among those who migrate TO the US. Only some of this is attributable to the phenomena of the anchor baby, the baby who is a citizen and thus able to protect his parents and extended family.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Illegal immigrants
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on May 14, 2007 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
would that the founding fathers did enforce the borders more stridently at the time. One can only imagine the better off the country would be environmentally, standard of living, crime-wise, etc. With a smaller population we could afford a larger social welfare state, better environmental laws, less buildings, and less crime.

Having said that. Even in the past the US government they did, for the most part, screen for health problems and attempted to have quota systems to keep out undesireables, however it failed as new immigrants (and descendents) voted it out. Luckily, for the USA there was still enough room, literally, for people to come and find new farms, cities, etc (or move from those that became infected or dangerious) and enough desire on the behalf of the late-coming (Catholics, Slavs, Poles, Italians, E.Europeans, etc) to assimilate into American culture and, for the most part (excepting the corruption, organised crime) work hard. Now, however, there is no control over the immigration in the USA. No quotas. No job skill requirement. No tracking. No criminal background check. No health screening. And there is less real property available for new immigrants (or for those to move away from infected areas) and the environmental damage (much less the societal damage) is far greater in potential than in the past. The rate, as well as aggregate numbers, is also much increased in this new, illegal immigration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have to keep reminding myself
Posted by: Soco on May 14, 2007 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That in order to be a good liberal I have to see the "Human Rights" issue more than the overwhelming reasons illegal immigration is not good for the country.

Unfortunately, in order to be a good little liberal you have to accept ridiculous arguments concerning illegal immigration. Sorry, I can't be a good little liberal. What AlterNet, The Nation and other rags don't tell you is that the majority of real people that consider themselves liberals are against illegal immigration. Many conservatives are too, regardless of what a rich conservative Republican says (They do the work nobody else wants to do). One guy Max Blumenthal basically says if you disagree you are either a racist, skinhead, Miltiaman, Neo Nazi, blah blah blah (No shit!). Well, there is a little truth to it but it's slanted to frame everyone who does not accept the influx of illegal aliens must be a flaming Nazi hate monger. "Hell, I don't want to be branded a Hater by my liberal friends." Gotcha! It's the same freaking tactic conservative freaks and wingnuts use to accept patently abusurd arguments (Do I smell Hegelian Dialectic?). Great job supporting the influx of illegal aliens under the guise of progressive liberals everywhere (While serving the cause of cheap labor for our coporate masters and ahemm repungnicans.

I find it comical establishment liberals and conservatives each take advantage of these unfortunate people as cheap labor from each side of the argument. I also find it farcical that they are, in politically correct jargon, referred to as "Undocumented Workers/Aliens" when in many cases they are using forged documents to gain employment. They are heavily documented, yet falsely. To go one step further many are having children here who gain citizenship by virtue of birth who become the only legal members of the family, who, incidentally can't work, but can burden an already troubled system.

Note to supporters of the "Undocumented Workers" crap. Will you continue to support them if they steal your identity? Yea, leprosy is treatable, so you'll not mind contracting it from your gardener. I'm sure if you are laid off work because it's cheaper to employ an undocumented worker you'll be okay, your saving will help. We socially conscience liberals can feel okay taking the moral high ground because 1) Alternet said it's the right position to take 2) It doesn't affect me (yet). We can be as reprehensible as a Christian Fundamentalist in so doing but not hindered by the stigma of "fundamentalist intolerance."

These aliens are also impacting the employment of legal minorities which are already citizens of the country. Part of the reason they are here in due to NAFTA, which Clinton signed. The real human issue is getting Mexico to address their economy and creating jobs. Contrary to popular belief the Political Elite are white Spaniards who view them as they're version of the "N-Word" because they are predominately indigenous natives they don't want.

Fact is that Dobbs is FOR legal immigration and his wife and children are Mexican-American. Does the Establishment Left tell this story? No, I haven't seen it in our favorite lefty rags. Many on the left are trying to paint Dobbs as a racist while not telling you about his family. I'm sure it could be painted Mrs. Dobbs is suffering domestic terrorism from a rabid isolationist, xenophobic madman by the Left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What are you talking about? Posted by: Joshua Holland
The straight scoop about Media Matters founder, David Brock.
Posted by: TheTruthSeeker on May 14, 2007 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Brock was a prominent conservative journalist in the 1990s. During that time, he was best known for his anti-Anita Hill book, The Real Anita Hill. and authoring the Troopergate story that led to Paula Jones filing a lawsuit against Bill Clinton.

After declaring he was gay, Brock claimed he became a liberal.

Writing in the Internet magazine, “The Nation,” Christopher Hitchens said about Brock, “He's plainly lying about his past. He's also lying about his future.”

Brock did admit printing falsehoods about Hill following her testimony against then-Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas. In an exclusive 2001 interview, NPR Legal Affairs Correspondent Nina Totenberg talked to Brock about the confession, detailed in a forthcoming book.

Brock claimed that while he was writing for the conservative magazine, "The American Spectator," and researching the Real Anita Hill book, he was a tool of rightwing activists who fed him false information about Hill. Brock told Totenberg that he accepted the truthfulness of the information without checking the assumed facts.

Brock also admitted to Totenberg that he tried to contact Hill in 1998 to apologize, but ultimately "didn't have the guts" to talk with her.

FrontPage magazine said that Brock “retained all the habits of his journalistic path and in particular the determination that political opponents should not only be disputed but utterly discredited.”

From his vicious attacks on Lou Dobbs and Don Imus, David Brock, a so-called former conservative other journalists nicknamed the “Rightwing Hit Man,” has simply changed his skin. But the fangs are just as sharp and venomous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Quite the exposé ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
No more abuse to immigrants! Enough is enough
Posted by: silviantonia on May 14, 2007 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Dobbs recently stated, in a program on immigration, that Mexicans come here only to bring crime... We are going to institute a program of protest letters and WILL BOYCOTT any sponsor of Mr. Dobb's shows. This type of callous and evil comment, defamatory to the people of a nation we have debased, after stealing most of their valuable land under the guise of freedom (which was just a ploy to institute slavery in Mexican lands - LET US NOT REMEMBER THE ALAMO!), must stop now.

The people of the Américas (no, America IS NOT a country) have had it with US imperialism. Basta ya. The Dobbs of this world must be put down; they breed hatred and foster fascism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Healing the Lepers....
Posted by: jaby on May 14, 2007 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although I am not a christian anymore, I was raised in that tradtion and can speak at length on many of the traditions...

Leprosy, though very treatable now, was feared greatly through history by many different peoples. Perhaps if not for the severity or communicability of the disease, then for the disfigurment that is caused by the disease when left untreated and the negative associations that go along with that.

Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and his ilk (although, I should note that Mr Dobbs has butted heads with them many times) claim that this is a christian nation, in otherwords, a nation whose goal it should be to imitate the life of Christ. What is interesting is his choice of disease, leprosy. Jesus did not pass by the lepors, leaving them to their fates. In fact, according to the legend (Luke 17) Jesus healed the lepers he met on the road, including at least one who was not a Jew but a Samaritan. Showing kindness to foreigners was verboten in those day, but the man who we are told to imitate by thses people did not care what their religion or nationality was. He cared for them.

I know that Shrub's amnesty program is in large part an appeal to these christian voters, whose churches support amnesty. However, unless he was caught boffing a little boy or taking Jenna to the local Planned Parenthood for a little snip and suck, these people would vote for his predecessor regardless. He is pandering to christians. Trying to make himself seem like a nice guy. At the same time, he gets to look good for many immigrants in this country. Pretty sweet deal for him, you have to admit. I have to say at least that I admire Lou Dobbs for calling bullshit on Shrubs nice guy scheme. IMHO, this is just a feel-good issue for shrub, he nor his cabinent could care less.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/05/08/Dobbs.May9/index.html

Now, I truly don't know what the aswer to the immigration problem is, and I won't pretend to. It is merely interesting to me that Mr Dobbs would choose such an emotionally loaded disease. If he was really interested in convincing Mr. John and Jane chrstian republican voter USA of his purported position, perhaps he should of used a differnt disease? Of course, he may just be trying to do the opposite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Healing the Lepers.... Posted by: terminus
» RE: Healing the Lepers.... Posted by: terminus
Give Lou some love
Posted by: joshuawelch on May 14, 2007 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether or not Dobbs’ assertion about leprosy is accurate or not, he is a champion of the working people and he has been right on the money regarding illegal immigration. A huge supply of cheap labor severely hinders legal American worker’s opportunities to find jobs that pay fair wages and decent benefits. Illegal immigrants are a huge burden on our public schools as well. We have immigration laws for good reasons. Population is an enormous environmental topic that nobody is willing to talk about. Mexican illegal immigrants have the highest reproduction rates amongst any other ethnicity in America and they are also very religious. If there’s one thing we could do without is more religion. Dobbs has consistently been the kind of journalists that the public need. One who takes on tough issues that effect the working people of America from unfair trade to healthcare. The public ought to demand this kind of journalists from the rest of the corporate commercial media

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Give Lou some love Posted by: Tjaye
Leprosy may or may not be a problem, but overpopulation most definitely is.
Posted by: Pat Kittle on May 14, 2007 11:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The least immigrants could do is abandon their 3rd world birthrates upon arriving in the world's most wasteful 1st world country!

And that doesn't mean "in a couple generations" either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmm....
Posted by: TWilliams on May 14, 2007 4:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not know about leprosy but I know our local hospital has seen a HUGE increase in TB from the migrant population. 15 years ago it was not a problem at all and now I see numerous cases on a weekly basis and every one has been a migrant. Not to mention around 60 hospitals in southern California have closed. Then again I do not care. I have money to pay for my own health care because I have worked my entire life.

I think it is hilarious all of the support illegal immigrants get. Illegal immigrants have done a lot of damage to our communities and have displaced tons of jobs - mostly jobs of the poor. This site claims it supports the average working American but it does everything to undermine the average worker. I think it is wonderful that 20 million illegal immigrant are in the US. I hope it goes all the way up to 100 million and this nation gets torn apart. I want the people who support anarchy to get what they want - total chaos and the the collapse of the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hmmm.... Posted by: xconservative
Lou Dobbs has no credibility unless
Posted by: maxpayne on May 14, 2007 4:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he makes the connection between "Free" trade along with wars for OIL and illegalized immigration. When Lou connects the dots, then he's credible. Until then, he sounds more canned and choppy. Pushing people off their land via war and faux "free" trade has always been and will continue to be the cause for illegal immigration. Along with it, you can thank deregulation for big businesses and union busting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Immigrants and crime
Posted by: fanny666 on May 14, 2007 5:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another reason "immigrants are bad", debunked.

The Myth of Immigrant Criminality and the Paradox of Assimilation: Incarceration Rates Among Native and Foreign-Born Men

Worth reading, you get the picture just by looking @ the graphs

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Free Trade" Means Illegal Immigration
Posted by: sofla100 on May 14, 2007 5:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are going to have so-called "free trade," then you have essentially opened yourself up to illegal immigration. If capital can essentially move to where wages are cheapest, then the opposite, labor moving to where wages are the highest, is all but inevitable. Workers in factories for $2 or $3 a day are going to quickly see that their counterparts in the USA are making 10 times that, and then they will all want to move. Now, if even this $2 or so a day, is way above the local country average, it is going to still create a strong sense of "rising expectations." People quickly will want the highest wage for services, and a little old national border isn't going to mean much. Lastly you have a strong fairness argument. If capital can move, why cannot labor move? Why cannot labor move to where its services net the most profit. It seems to me the rich elites want the system working just their way. They want to be free to move jobs and factories to the lowest paying slave labor scum holes in the world, but if those people come to America and demand a better living, they get all upset.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The bigger travesty is the author's omission
Posted by: DaBear on May 14, 2007 7:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dobb's/Romans' source is never properly identified. She's a white supremacist. Southern Poverty Law Center has a fascinating dossier on her. AlterNet does a gross disservice by not investigating to the core of the figures Dobbs is clinging to as fact. Yes, Dobbs is a sick, twisted asshat rich white guy, but it's who he goes to for sources of propaganda.... white supremacists, that's the real problem. For more, go to the sources the AlterNet piece didn't bother to tell you about: SPLC and David Neiwert (dneiwert.blogspot.com). The good "doctor" Romans/Dobbs rely on for their perverse "facts" is the core of the problem. Thankfully the quality journalists and investigators left in this twisted Funkymental nation state have the goods on her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Censure Dobbs
Posted by: faultroy on May 15, 2007 1:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I really like reading about some of the issues Dobbs champions, I have a real problem with his failure to admit that his information is incorrect.
It does not matter whether you're conservative, liberal, progressive, libertarian or anywhere inbetween. It is critical that all politically aware individuals at no point accept biased bigoted or manipulated information from any source.
A Journalist has a responsibility first and foremost to present accurate and unmanipulated information to the public at large.
To not do so is the equivalent to not allowing your reader his or her right to choose. One cannot truly choose if the data is incorrect.
The big problem that we in the USA have is that so much of the journalistic material has been systematically changed and manipulated for its targeted audience.
The crime on the part of the public is to allow this to go on.
There is no excuse for not immediately admitting to the falaciousness of the information.
It is no one's responsibility other than the disseminator to verify the accuracy of the information.
Dobbs should have immediately reinvestigated not only the information, but who gave it, the circumstances under which it was given, and whether it is inaccurate.
Shame on Dobbs for refusing to do so. Alternet readers have a right to obtain untainted statistical information. And Alternet authors have a responsibility to give it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My, my. We forget our history so quickly!
Posted by: Bart Thesc on May 15, 2007 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I recall, it was the Europeans that brought a large number of deadly, devastating diseases to the Americas. Decimating large numbers of the population. As a matter of fact there were cases of disease being deliberately spread to reduce the native populations.

Anyone remember a couple of popular ones such as smallpox or syphilis?

For Lou Dobbs to spout numbers that don't have a statistical basis simply speaks to his credibility as a journalist(?). For others to take the concept, with good or bad numbers, and use them to address a much larger societal issue is called selective use of facts.

Comparing Hansen's disease (leprosy) to smallpox might be an interesting study. About 95% of the population can't get Hansen's disease, it is eminently curable today and it is rarely fatal. Smallpox on the other hand was highly communicable and fatal to sometimes over 30% of it's victims.

If Mr. Dobbs is in search of a gibberish statistic to tilt at against immigrants, perhaps he should look into how many lightning strikes they bring with them and the danger they pose to legal citizens.

Don't many of them have gold teeth?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fear and lies were used to sell the war on Iraq. Now they're used to sell a war on immigrants
Posted by: SteveB on May 15, 2007 7:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the same line of B.S., down to the smallest detail: remember the "biological weapons" Saddam had? Those "infectious immigrants" are equally dangerous - which is to say, not at all.

How sad that some people can't learn from history, and allow themselves to be manipulated by those in power, time and time again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The battle is against volunteer ignorance not ethinicity
Posted by: Lesha on May 16, 2007 2:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is obvious that corporations should be the main target of protest being that they provide the source of work for illegal immigrants.


With the above being the source, immigrants are a danger not because of their ethnicity or work ethics, they are a danger because they are too willing (without knowing it) to settle for what scraps corporations will throw their way as far as work is concern . These folks are being used to undercut most of this society and foolishly make the rich even richer while those in the middle are squeezed out.

These poor fools do not realize that they allowed in this country in droves to help set up a society like Mexico where the rich controls over 90% of the wealth while the rest fight for the scraps. The young men and children of these immigrants will be used to fight wars under the guise that they will be given citizenship in exchange for their service not knowing that their chances of survival are low. Right now about 60.000 of the troops in Iraq are illegal immigrants.

These folks are also being used to accelerate the illiteracy of the on coming generation this country by overcrowding the school system with children who come from a culture were work is more important the education (study the inviorment they come from). These children will also grow up to assimilate in street life instead of educating themselves to a degree of self respect and civility that would help their community. The following can be seen in their drop out rate which puts them and blacks neck and neck at the bottom of the barrel.

Immigrants will never get ahead in the work force because if they demand more money and benefits (if they have any), their bosses will just hire more immigrants who will undercut the old immigrants thus compounding the problem of a never ending growing population of illegals undercutting not only US citizens, but each-other.

The elite cannot succeed if they don't have the people who would settle for this crap. This is why along with many more reasons these folks are a danger. This has nothing to do with race but rather ignorance on a high scale. These people do not understand that their marches, radio stations, pro immigrant tee-shirts, and platform to speak on, is sponcered by corperations and the politicians that work for them.

I would be interested in knowing from supporters of this crap, how many is enough?

What in the blue hell is your limit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anchor baby avalanche? Confirmed by Snopes
Posted by: Pat Kittle on May 16, 2007 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anchor baby avalanche

Oh joy!!

3rd world birthrates & 1st world appetites!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're disgusting ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement