COMMENTS: 76
Media Finally Discovers Army of Pat Robertson Acolytes in Bush Administration
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.
When Monica Goodling's name erupted into the news last week, the mainstream press discovered suddenly that Pat Robertson's Regent University exists. Not only that, the press learned that it has made a deep footprint in George W. Bush's Washington.
Since Robertson's failed presidential campaign, coverage of him has largely focused on his mercurial and bizarre personality. He seemed only to appear in the news when one of his many entertainingly outrageous gaffes or false prophecies earned publicity. While Robertson's hysterical episodes deserved all the coverage they generated, with a few notable exceptions, the mainstream press habitually ignored his political machinations. Robertson and his cadres exploited this lack of scrutiny to quietly erect a sophisticated and far-reaching political network that today propells the Christian right's ongoing march through the institutions.
The right has exploited the mainstream press's ignorance about Robertson to avoid weathering the blowback from his most embarassing gaffes. Case in point: Two years ago, after Robertson called for the assassination of Hugo Chavez, Fox News' Brit Hume introduced what would become a central talking point for spinning the controversy. On the August 23, 2005 episode of Fox News' Special Report, Hume declared, "The televangelist Pat Robertson's political influence may have been declining since he came in second in the Iowa Republican caucuses 17 years ago. And he may have no clout with the Bush administration."
Morton Kondracke echoed Hume, exclaiming that "Pat Robertson's day has long since passed."
Predictably, the right's spin seeped into the mainstream press. The day after Hume and Kondracke's exchange, Knight Ridder asserted that Robertson's influence "has waned." As evidence, the news service quoted one "leader" of the "evangelical movement" claiming, "He's an old man and there's a group of old women and old men who watch him." Old men can't be influential, don't you know?
The usually sagacious John Green, a University of Akron professor who has emerged as the go-to guy for virtually any reporter covering the Christian right, swooped in to join the parrot jungle chirping about Robertson's death knell. In an interview with the National Review's Byron York (who recently blew his wad trying to discredit the jury that convicted Scooter Libby), Green concluded that while Robertson is "certainly a consequential figure," he is "more in tune with what was happening with evangelicals 20 or 30 years ago" than his contemporaries.
But in the wake of Goodling's hotly publicized resignation, the mainstream press suddenly -- and correctly -- decided to judge Robertson by the fruits he has borne. In the Washington Post-owned Slate Magazine, Dahlia Lithwick published a penetrating look at "How Pat Robertson's law school is changing America." Lithwick notes that as early as 1997, when Goodling was enrolled at Regent and working as a spokesperson for the school's Office of Government, she was ducking pointed questions from reporters.
The Boston Globe also ran a insightful look at Regent Law's impact on public policy. The Globe cited (as I did days earlier right here) Kay Coles James as the key link between Regent and the Bush White House. The Globe's Charlie Savage wrote, "In 2001, the Bush administration picked the dean of Regent's government school, Kay Coles James, to be the director of the Office of Personnel Management -- essentially the head of human resources for the executive branch. The doors of opportunity for government jobs were thrown open to Regent alumni."
The sudden interest in Robertson's political network spread to the L.A. Times on April 6 when it profiled Christian Broadcasting Network's star political reporter and blogger, David Brody. The Times correctly notes that despite his affiliation with the supposedly discredited reverend, Brody has "developed a real web base among followers of the presidential races." Indeed, Brody's blog has become a critical window into evangelical opinion on candidates from both parties. In the process, Brody has lent newfound credibility to Robertson's flagship news network.
The Christian right is far more than a pantheon of charismatic backlashers with automatonic followers of "old men and women." It is also a sophicated political operation with a coherent long-term strategy. Goodling may be out of a job, but thousands of capable Christian right cadres remain, waging the culture war from inside the White House, federal agencies and Republican congressional offices. Together they will continue to inflame conflicts that were previously unimaginable.
Anyone insisting in spite of continuously mounting evidence that the Christian right is going to simply shrink into oblivion because the Democrats control Congress, or because evangelical leaders are prone to scandal, should learn from Goodling's example and take the fifth.
Monica Goodling, a previously unknown Justice Department official who served as liaison to the White House, has become a key figure in the Attorneygate scandal. When newly released emails revealed the prominent role Goodling played in engineering the firing of seven US Attorneys, Goodling pled the Fifth Amendment, refusing to testify under oath.
Josh Marshall writes that Goodling may be "afraid of indictment for perjury because she has to go up to Congress and testify under oath before the White House has decided what its story is."
Goodling's involvement in Attorneygate is not the only aspect of her role in the Bush administration that bears examination. Her membership in a cadre of 150 graduates of Pat Robertson's Regent University currently serving in the administration is another, equally revealing component of the White House's political program.
Goodling earned her law degree from Regent, an institution founded by Robertson "to produce Christian leaders who will make a difference, who will change the world." Helping to purge politically disloyal federal prosecutors is just one way Goodling has helped fulfill Robertson's revolutionary goals.
Regent has assiduously cultivated close ties to the administration and its Republican outriders. Gonzales's predecessor, John Ashcroft, is currently cooling his heels at Regent as the school's "Distinguished Professor of Law and Government." Christian right super-lawyer Jay Sekulow, who also teaches at Regent and shares a Washington office with Ashcroft, participated in regular briefings with the White House on court appointments. In 1998, he leased a private jet through Regent to fly Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia to speak at the school's 20th anniversary (Though Sekulow regularly argues cases before the Supreme Court, he apparently did not view hobnobbing with Scalia as an ethical breach).
When the Bush administration came into power, it looked to Regent for a reliable pool of well-groomed Republican ideologues eager to wage the culture war from the inside. The former dean of Regent's Robertson School of Government, Kay Coles James, was promptly installed as the Director of the Office of Personnel Management.
According to her bio, from 2001 to 2005, James was "President Bush's principal advisor in matters of personnel administration for the 1.8 million members of the Federal civil service." In that role, James rolled back the power of unions in the federal sector. Now that she's out of government, James is back among her Christian right allies, appearing frequently as a guest on James Dobson's Focus on the Family radio show.
Another Regent figure who impacted White House policy is Jim David, the current Assistant Dean for Administration in the Robertson School of Government. David was inserted in the Justice Department in 2003 as yet another sop to the Christian right; he served as deputy director of the department's Task Force for the Faith-Based & Community Initiative.
Since leaving the DoJ, David has spent a considerable portion of his spare time writing opinion pieces that appear on Regent's website. One of his most noteable screeds, penned in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, described a bright spot in the destruction of New Orleans. "We do not grieve, however, for the flooded and destroyed sex clubs that filled men with lust and degraded women," David wrote. "We do not miss the casinos that preyed upon individuals whose lack of self-control deprived families of needed food and shelter. We do not lament the destruction of voodoo stores prevalent in New Orleans before the flood."
At Regent, Goodling was drilled in the importance of unflinching loyalty to the Republican program. Once in the Justice Department, she proved an able cog in the Bush administration's political machine, meeting with Republican activists in 2006 to help plot the firing of New Mexico's prestigious US Attorney David Iglesias, a fellow Republican who "chafed" against administration initiatives.
But as scrutiny of her actions intensifies, the evangelical Goodling must resort to the 5th Amendment -- man's law -- to avoid breaking the biblical commandment against lying. Only the goodly and godly Pat Robertson could have prepared her to make such a decision.
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 13, 2007 2:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what? In two years, they’ll be looking for jobs as America’s unstoppable political pendulum swings back to center.
I can’t imagine anything more embarrassing than submitting an employment application in 2009 that says the person worked for the most corrupt and incompetent administration in U.S. history -- with a special notation in the remarks section, “I never took the Fifth,”
Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The good times for the Christian right in Washington will soon be their end times.
Posted by: Thucy
» The pendulum's swing weight is the Iraq War. Without it, you would be 100% right.
Posted by: HughScott
» RE: The pendulum's swing weight is the Iraq War. Without it, you would be 100% right.
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: The pendulum's swing weight is the Iraq War. Without it, you would be 100% right.
Posted by: jimbobuddy
» But the Dems are morally reprehensible
Posted by: peritonlogon
» They DO want the war to continue and expand.
Posted by: justaguy
» RE: The pendulum's swing weight is the Iraq War. Without it, you would be 100% right.
Posted by: CatDad
» A QUOTE FROM GARY NORTH, IN 1982, POWERFUL PART OF RECONSTRUCTIONIST MOVEMENT,
Posted by: mdruss42
» RE: Why only 5% atheist?
Posted by: Edward George
» RE: Why only 5% atheist?
Posted by: aussidawg
» ANSWER: Atheists are believers, too. Agnostics are the ones who apply deductive reasoning.
Posted by: HughScott
» Nonsense.
Posted by: justaguy
» RE: Nonsense.
Posted by: Philip Newton
» Hope you're right
Posted by: Philip Newton
» RE: The good times for the Christian right in Washington will soon be their end times.
Posted by: Malamute
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zipper696 on Apr 13, 2007 3:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's not assume that ousting Bush or even a GOP Presidency will inhibit these ideologues from their "Sacred Mission"
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Do you really think so ?
Posted by: Bozwell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: reval on Apr 13, 2007 4:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Goodling story, her affiliation with Reagent "University" and her special kind of "employment" in the BushCo regime has to be the most under-reported story of the year so far.
The facts surronding this scandal deserve considerably more attention than that given by either the MSM or the blogs. When it is, we'll also discover the role of such "schools" as Liberty "University" as well. And yes, I put the word "University" in quotes whenever I mention these institutions of lower learning. They're schools all right - schools that have managed to obtain their accededation only through the good grace of King George's Office of Faith-Based initiatives!
The MSM has missed this story entirely. As usual, it's been way too busy with the likes of Anna Nicol Smut, Don Imus and the NC "rape" case to be bothered with reporting on something that has sucked our tax dollars and liberties into the black hole of godly "faith" for the past 6+ years.
Remember Diderot: Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with entrails of the last priest.
Rev. El Mundo
WVCSR
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Better to wait for Godot than act on Diderot.
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» RE: Ah come on....
Posted by: aussidawg
» Madrassa USA?
Posted by: Philip Newton
» Does it come with poppadoms? (nm)
Posted by: justaguy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mrtshw on Apr 13, 2007 6:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Delusional idiots which abound among the anti-christian Robertson/Falwell/Dobson/Colson homophobic fascists are but the unfotunate "droppings" of the evils spewed and spawned for decades by these 'Christian' cretins.
Robertson is among the most vile human beings on the planet. He hordes a vast personal fortune amassed from inherited wealth, media, hellish diamond mines, fake charities, fake "nutrition' drinks, fake religion. He has called for the assassination of world leaders such as Hugo Chavez, anti-christs lurking in Israel, and probably most episcopalians alive today. Robertson pronounced Katrina as God's revenge for the wickedness in New Orleans, prayed God would erase Dover,PA for rejecting creationism. Robertson denounces abortion in the US but is okay with mass abortions in China where he curries their favor regarding his vast business interests. May Robertson's entrails be the first used to strangle the whordes of criminals thriving within our government, MSM, and corporate swine herds.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Only one correction to your missive...
Posted by: LeaderofMen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Apr 13, 2007 6:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Don't forget Jesuit and Catholic schools and the Mormon schools!
Posted by: freethink7
» problem is that government schools are just as bad, sometimes worse
Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: problem is that government schools are just as bad, sometimes worse
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: problem is that government schools are just as bad, sometimes worse
Posted by: blitzmesser
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Apr 13, 2007 6:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then, of course there's the Christian Broadcasting Network ... a $2 BILLION dollar endowment frees it from the need to sell advertising or garner contributions, at all.
And of course there's Liberty University and the grad school cum think-tank American Center for Law and Justice ...
So, like the persecution of Christians in Godless Liberal America, the 'fading away' of Pat Robertson is very much overstated !
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Should we even be surprised by that photo op, given...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Knowmad on Apr 13, 2007 8:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That headline is the real story here. If it's true that the media just realized/discovered/figured this out, then your fourth estate is in even more trouble than it seemed.
Perhaps it's just that, with chushrovian minions crashing and burning at every turn, your stalwart journalists are brave now - like chipmunks gingerly peeking out to see if the horrible doggie has gone away.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: counterpoint on Apr 13, 2007 8:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If someone else can confirm/correct this please post, I'll look for it myself.
The accreditation process of higher education in the US is murky. I for one would not allow a religious doctrinal outfit to carry the name university unless the sciences are taught according to modern standards in the core curriculum, i.e. including evolution.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» correction: it was Patrick Henry Univ.
Posted by: counterpoint
» For more on PHC and HSLDA,
Posted by: eddie torres
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peritonlogon on Apr 13, 2007 8:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until pragmatism becomes a strong movement in this county all we're doing is trying to walk up an icy hill. Until "faith based initiatives" in the context of government becomes a dirty word that people are embarassed of and "culture war" becomes a phrase that only lamers and idiots use (no offese to idiots) we will simply have to be patient (I hear Congress 2.0 is supposed to start beta testing in 2-5 years, but then again isn't that always the story, in a few years, maybe reasonable people will prevail.)
The next time someone says "well that's just my opinion" or "I've got a right to my own opinion" or any of the various phrases people use to try to shield their wrong ideas from examination, tell them "no, in fact, opinions can indeed be objectively wrong, for example, the one you just expressed. Some opinions are arived at through faith and some through reason and they are not equally valid, an opion arived at through faith is simply a string of empty words if it is applied to the rest of the world."
Faith and religion are superhighways of corruption. Not only do they coax people into disbelieving their better judgement, but the religious organizations come with a mobilized and well trained core of individuals to sieze and consolidate the power they are grabbing for. This is their business...the model is simple, it goes like this.
Relax intellectual standards of the group --> Convice the group that the world as it is is disappointing and frustrating ---> Hold up tight-knit social organization and dogma as a way to combat frustration and disappointment ---> Position tight-knit social organization in power, and invent magical, unqestionable rules that prevent the leaders from losing power.
This business has been around for thousands of years and has proven quite resilient. Other than simply converting the faithful to another dogma, the only serious way of combating religious intrusions and corruptions is through pragmatism and education or in other words, serious intellectual discipline and high standards. If someone testifying before congress, or speaking on a major network is voicing opinions less well reasoned that a highschool student, they do not deserve to be granted an audience or a response, they should simply be shunned from the public spotlight until they are able to think and speak as well as a highscholl student and they should not be given any serious attention until they reason as well as a college graduate (that's right, a 22 year old, low standards for deserving serious public attention.)
And remember, if, while interviewing or reviewing a candiate for public office, you ever start feeling "I don't think this guy is up to the task" or even just questioning "Is this guy really up to the task?" eliminate him or her from your list of potential candiates. It's that simple, if half the country thinks a man isn't bright enough to run the country, they are not simply being pretentious, (as so many media networks tried say in 2000 and 2004) they are bringing up legitimate concerns of competence. And if the candidate runs on not being well informed or civic minded, but knowing some important and well connected people, he should receive nothing but contempt, cerntainly not national coverage.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So now our collective heads
Posted by: counterpoint
» RE: So now our collective heads
Posted by: counterpoint
» I think you're projecting
Posted by: peritonlogon
» "Faith and religion are superhighways of corruption."
Posted by: Philip Newton
» RE: "Faith and religion are superhighways of corruption."
Posted by: Rungle
» RE: "Faith and religion are superhighways of corruption."
Posted by: Philip Newton
» Man I wish I checked responders sooner
Posted by: peritonlogon
Comments are closed-
Posted by: freethink7 on Apr 13, 2007 9:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think the majority of people in our country are buying it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I don't think most care, or they tacitly approve
Posted by: truthteller
» RE: Worker apathy
Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Worker apathy
Posted by: truthteller
» Why does it go in only one direction?
Posted by: LeaderofMen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Apr 13, 2007 10:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Small correction
Posted by: HeroesAll
» Margaret Atwood - extraordinary!
Posted by: Knowmad
» Read someone from south of the border....you will like her as much as i like Ms Atwater
Posted by: mdruss42
» RE: ead someone from south of the border....you will like her as much as i like Ms Atwater
Posted by: Knowmad
» Strings are being pulled, but not by Robertson's zombies
Posted by: eddie torres
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sunfell on Apr 13, 2007 10:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I first started writing and talking about the Christian Right and their more extreme beliefs and goals of undermining our Constitution and replacing it with some Orwellian Biblical horror, people thought I was being an alarmist, or was reading too much into their 'mission statements' and articles posted in their own circles and communities.
People don't say that to me any more. I've been vindicated, but I did not want to see their stealth movement go this far or get this deep into our government. It'll take years to flush them all out- if that is possible. We might be able to salvage our country, but I fear for the worst- even with these revalations. After all, the mainstream media is more interested in the spoutings of shock jocks, or the death of airheaded starlets or what is going on on "American Idol" than the actual newsworthy destruction of our Constitution by religious fanatics.
By the time they do wake up, it'll be too late- and we'll read about it from Der Spiegel or BBC, because our own media will be totally muzzled.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Apr 13, 2007 10:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though many of its followers want to do and be good, Christian leaders, whether we're talking about the Papacy, evangilists, or political leaders, are some of the most amoral, hypocritical, and deceptive people to be found. The time has finally arrived for the blind to open their eyes and understand that religion is purposeful deception and strong delusion.
Here is Wisdom !!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The mountain of evidence continues to grow...
Posted by: eyesunderwater
» RE: The mountain of evidence continues to grow...
Posted by: LeaderofMen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gisele on Apr 13, 2007 11:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No doubt Ms. Goodling's education included being obedient to Pat Robertson's ideals of Christianism, that man's law takes precedence - his law in particular. They've both forgotten that she should obey God's law first - a "Christian" obeys man's law as long as it doesn't contradict God's law. If it does, then God's comes first. Go ahead Ms. Goodling, tell it the way it really is - you have nothing to fear. Do you? It's that time dear lady, decide who you're going to serve. God or Mammon.
If you fear Mr. Robertson, then he obviously isn't the man of God he would have America believe he is. In which case his empire must be taxed to the fullest (as ALL religions must be if they interfere with politics), and the truth about his empire, teachings, and life style should become front page news for his followers to digest.
The maddening part of this is - the evangelicals and Christianist Right hold up men and women like these two as being what a good Christian should aspire to!
Jesus weeps.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Evangelicals and the Right
Posted by: Philip Newton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WhatNow? on Apr 13, 2007 1:29 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
happy, mentally healthy child is: Keep him or
her as far away from a church as you can."
Frank Zappa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Zappa
Posted by: counterpoint
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wleming on Apr 13, 2007 2:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: belief?
Posted by: animalleaderisgreat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: keefus55 on Apr 13, 2007 2:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sinclair was right!
Posted by: shhazam4
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jeanne on Apr 13, 2007 2:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: danielet on Apr 13, 2007 5:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eddie torres on Apr 14, 2007 8:48 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, that's what he's doing to pick up hot coeds. But he pays his bills with income from his National Security infrastructure clients. Ashcroft Group LLC is a lobbying operation hired by datamining and defence groups like Oracle, AT&T, General Dynamics, Exegy Inc, Dulles Research and Nanodetex Corp.
The cream of the Ashcroft Group's stable is ChoicePoint Inc: "... a data marketer that gathers public records and sells access to them." (Washington Post, 8/12/06).
Ashcroft Group's motto: "Leadership, Integrity, Results." Uh-huh. Get ready for "arbeit macht frei" you heathens.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Ashcroft's Motto...
Posted by: aussidawg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Philip Newton on Apr 15, 2007 11:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He wouldn't be the first madman to gather and direct a goodly following of True Believers.
That a goodly number of these have law degrees is even greater cause for concern.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mr. Terrific on Apr 15, 2007 1:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8ekRAvke9o&NR=1
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shhazam4 on Apr 15, 2007 6:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't let them get into our government.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aussidawg on Apr 15, 2007 6:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, I'm not trying to say that people shouldn't have the right to practice their belief, whether they happen to be Christian or not, and in fact, whollheartedly support their right to do so. I am saying however that (what they apparently perceive to be persecution) I do not want their viewpoints on what is or isn't moral, what is or isn't science, or for that matter, what is or isn't anything forced on me by law or any other means, nor do I wish to hear about their superstitious belief system from those who are elected to public office to serve everybody, regardless of belief. The evangelicals have to be the absolute definition of hypocrite as what they say compared to what they do are typically exact opposites, and exact opposite of what their leader taught. If they feel persecuted, perhaps they should learn to live and let live, and quit stepping on the toes of anyone who isn't a right wing evangelical "Christian". Then and only then, when they quit pissing eveyone else off, will they get the respect they believe they so richly deserve.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lwrightman on Apr 19, 2007 7:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's important for everyone to take the war to them in the local public square as well as the national blogs, because they have an incredible grassroots operation going on out here to destroy our Constitution and our American way of life. Please don't limit yourselves and your voices to the net blogs if you are so doing.
Please carry the battle to them in a reasoned, rational manner and debate to convince that silent majority of Christians in the communities not to veer to the extreme right in which the zealots like Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, and their extended family gang of fundamentalists are seeking to deceive them. Fundamentalists need to be marginalized because they are the same worldwide, regardless of what religion from whence they derive their fanaticism. The majority of people within every religion are decent and honorable people who are just trying to live good lives but are constantly being deceived by the extremes of fundamentalists in their ranks.
The truth is that Pat Robertson has the blood of the innocents on his hands. While the genocidal maniac Charles Taylor in West Africa was committing mass murder and raping children and lopping off women's breasts in his bloodlust of tribal genocide, Pat Robertson was proudly proclaiming Taylor to be a good and decent leader and honorable man. It turned out that Robertson and his religious corporation, with all their tithing wealth, had investments in Taylor's natural resources, particularly gold.
Robertson has no moral authority to talk to anyone about anything Godly. In fact, he and other fundamentalists worships a much darker force, because they seek to promote their zealotry and religious authoritarianism above all others.
Please, folks, carry the battle to the heartland of small town America with reasoned debate and honesty, and without the same heated rhetoric and hateful messaging that eschews from the bowels of the beasts of the extreme religious fundamentalists in those venues.
The empirical truths of history about the dark dominions of church-state empires and the creations of the two main religions by men are on the side of secularism. It's why our Founding Fathers, with their strong faiths in Christianity, sought to protect all of us from those who would use religion as a weapon against us for the state sponsorship of oppression. That is why they created a secular Constitution.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Erick Erickson Is the New CNN Go-to Bigot, Misogynist and Homophobe
Racist Right-Wing Shock Jock Who Threatened the Lives of Judges Beats Jail Rap for Second Time
Chatroulette: Naked Chicks, Boys Seeking Boobs and Connections Across the Globe




