Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

How the Right Uses People of Color to Foster Racism

By Margaret Kimberly, Black Agenda Report. Posted April 4, 2007.


White supremacy, sensing the need to repackage itself for consumption in polite company, partially fills the demand for racist bile by outsourcing to mercenary writers of color.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

White supremacy, sensing the need to repackage itself for consumption in polite company, partially fills the demand for racist bile by outsourcing to mercenary writers of color. Michelle Malkin and Dinesh D'Souza -- of Filipino and Indian descent, respectively -- are top guns of the genre, ever eager to slander non-whites, especially Blacks, as threats to Euro-American white "civilization."

For premium fees, Malkin and D'Souza act as trusted Gunga Dins and shock troops for fascism. The corporate media makes advocates of racism and white American supremacy very rich. American racism also gives certain non-white people advantages. They are able to escape the indignity that black Americans face. They are then able to disassociate themselves and become allies with the very worst and most dangerous aspects of political life in this country.

Michelle Malkin, born Michelle Maglalang, is a dark skinned Filipino-American who loves the worst that white American civilization has to offer. Malkin is a darling of the right wing, a blogger and author who is eager to advocate invading other nations, and spewing hatred of immigrants in general and of Muslims in particular.

Malkin constantly rails against immigration, complaining about "drive by" and "accidental" citizenship attained by the children of immigrants who she and others label "anchor" and "jackpot" babies.

Malkin never told her loyal readership that her father came to the United States in 1970 on a temporary work visa. She was born in October 1970. Malkin is herself a jackpot baby, given automatic citizenship when her parents were not even permanent residents. The truth may set you free, but it doesn't get you on Fox news.

In 2002 Malkin wrote that the internment of thousands of Japanese-Americans was "wrong and abhorrent." Who knows if she ever believed those words, but times changed quickly and there was a book deal waiting for an Asian who would approve past and future efforts to profile and then incarcerate non-white people.

Malkin is not just a self-hating Asian. She is a two-faced liar, having condemned Japanese internment just two years before defending it in print. In 2004 she wrote In Defense of Internment: The Case for "Racial Profiling" in World War II and the War on Terror. When racists fantasized about interning Arabs, she helped provide ammunition:

Make no mistake: I am not advocating rounding up all Arabs or Muslims and tossing them into camps, but when we are under attack, 'racial profiling' -- or more precisely, threat profiling -- is justified. It is unfortunate that well-intentioned Arabs and Muslims might be burdened because of terrorists who share their race, nationality or religion. But any inconvenience, no matter how bothersome or offensive, is preferable to being incinerated at your office desk by a flaming hijacked plane.
White people are never "inconvenienced" by raced based incarceration, even though there are white domestic terrorists, serial killers, and shooters in schools. Apparently Malkin thinks that is just fine.

Common sense makes it obvious that Malkin's dark skin has been problematic for her and she admits as much. "Here are some of the racial epithets I've been called in my lifetime: Chink. Gook. Jap. Nigger. Slant eyes. Dog-eater." She also suffered the color consciousness created by European colonialism:
Back in the Philippines, upscale restaurants refuse to hire natives with skin darker than sand. The movie industry promotes model 'mestizos' and 'Maria Claras' -- pale as paper due to the blanching effect of Spanish blood. Lighter-skinned cousins mocked me as 'The Brownie.' Pitying aunties suggested rubbing my skin with pumice stones for a more desirable complexion.
Malkin could have used these painful experiences to fight against racism, but that is a much tougher way to live and to get paid. Being a mouth piece for white/right America is a more certain path to a fat bank account.

Malkin has partners in crime, people who have either bought the supremacy myth or who just want to be on the winning, money making team. Dinesh D'Souza was one of the founders of the racist Dartmouth Review and the author of books such as The End of Racism, published in 1995.

The demise of racism was news to everyone else, but it was a convenient notion for the Indian-born D'Souza to sell. It was also a direct attack on black America. D'Souza's thesis came straight from Racism 101. Racism is gone and black people do badly only because of their "pathologies." D'Souza also thinks the Civil Rights Act should be repealed.

Like Malkin, the Indian-born D'Souza comes from a country whose darker citizens get the cold shoulder. Try finding an Indian movie star who isn't light skinned. Imagine D'Souza's delight upon arriving in the United States. He was now part of a so-called model minority that was given certain advantages, even if the "n word" was hurled in his direction. All he had to do was sign up for the right wing propaganda machine of racism and aggression and he was home free.

D'Souza's latest homage to foolishness is called The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and Its Responsibility for 9/11:
In this book I make a claim that will seem startling at the outset. The cultural left in this country (such people as Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, George Soros, Michael Moore, Bill Moyers, and Noam Chomsky) is responsible for causing 9/11.
Like Malkin, D'Souza lies at the drop of a hat. When he was called on his bizarre hate speech, he began to back pedal furiously. "I argue that the American left bears a measure of responsibility for the volcano of anger from the Muslim world that produced the 9/11 attacks."

D'Souza apparently forgot what he wrote. The word "measured" is no where to be found, in the title or in the text:
I am saying that the cultural left and its allies in Congress, the media, Hollywood, the nonprofit sector and the universities are the primary cause of the volcano of anger toward America that is erupting from the Islamic world ... the left is the primary reason for Islamic anti-Americanism as well as the anti-Americanism of other traditional cultures around the world. I intend to show that the left has actively fostered the intense hatred of America that has led to murderous attacks such as 9/11." [Italics mine.]
D'Souza's book is a cynical obscenity, meant to silence the left and promote the Bush administration's efforts to dominate as much of the world as possible. He just makes things up as he goes along and then pretends he didn't write what is clear for all to see.

Bin Laden said on many occasions that he is angry about America's support for the Israeli occupation of Palestine. He was angry with the Saudi regime and its decision to allow American troops on their soil. Michael Moore, abortion and gay marriage were never on the bin Laden list of pet peeves. What are facts when there is money to be made and an ideology to support?

D'Souza's true purpose in writing this screed is to provoke hatred and legitimize violence against anyone who opposes the white/right wing agenda. His assertion that people who disagree with him are the nation's enemies is offensive and dangerous but it hasn't hurt D'Souza's career at all.

There will be more Malkins and D'Souzas as long as hatred is profitable and anti-black racist rules apply. They are just the latest in a long line of openly racist and fascist opinion makers. A quick glance at the television screen might lead one to believe that they would be on the side of the oppressed, when nothing could be further from the truth.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: racism, michelle malkin

Margaret Kimberley is a freelance writer living in New York City. She also maintains the Freedom Rider blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Malkin and to a lesser extent D'souza are damaged individuals...
Posted by: yellow on Apr 4, 2007 1:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These two individuals seem extremely emotionally damaged by their experiences in European society. They possess (especially Malkin) what Franz Fanon termed a colonized mentality. They have been brainwashed to hate their identity. They constantly compare their cultures to European values and culture and always find theirs inferior. Their frustration with racism was turned inward against themselves and they promote the worst of Western racist and imperialist dogmas as a way of denying their own identities which they wrongly blame for their suffering at the hands of Western racism.

They have been recruited to advocate for the causes championed by the leaders of imperialist societies striking down all those critics, European and non-European, as decadent and vile in order to feel more closely identified with the colonial master.

This may be a simplistic knee-jerk leftist reaction to what is indeed a complex psychological phenomenon. History is full of such examples. Jews joining Neo-Nazi organizations is one example. There are others. Each time there seems to be a self-loathing and blame of one's self for the hounding and suffering felt by years of racist oppression. The message sinks in that the one against whom the racism is directed must indeed be inferior. In response, the victim lashes out in endeavor to "join" the oppressor in order to "save" himself and evade suffering. In the end only more self loathing can ensue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not that simple!
Posted by: Temporary on Apr 4, 2007 2:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People cant forever stay silent on issues such as out of controll immigration(legal or illegal)just because they happen to be black. To my it would be like the Soviet Union;because some crazy policies we'd be forced to back some insane, suicidal stupidity!

This is one of the reason why colored people dont take part in politics(for example i dind't vote)You try not to make a big issue out of stuff like immigration or outsourcing because it's a "white mans thing" but eventually as the situation becomes worse, it becomes impssobile. Still many colored people try to avoid becoming "race traitors" as much as possible. You try to be loyal to the ideals of multiculturism and tolerance, but at some point it simply becomes impossible. I had a change of voting a black candidate(I live in Europe but wont say where)but didn't! I actually emailed BOTH to a white and black canditate to ask about an issue that is VERY important to my! The white one was atleast honest, and answered wery soon after he got the email. His answer wasn't however what i was looking for. The black candidate(quite frankly a snob)didn't even bother to answer my, so at the end of day i decidet not to vote for ANYONE!

We colored people do take A LOT of bullshit from out leaders(who have teamed up with the white, globalist elite)but at some point is simply has to STOP! I mean, people in Asia and Africa teamed up with the Soviets during the cold war. Ofcourse they KNEW what short of people the Soviets truly were! You tried basicly to just strike the deals and get the weapons, that were the only thing standing between you, and utter DEFEAT You just tried to basicly ignore the HORRORS that went on in Eastern-Europe, but eventually Soviet(white)arrogance made that simply impossible, and it lead to an example to the Sino-Soviet split.

The point is, we "colored" people have taken A LOT of crap from our leaders for political reasons, and still do(one example would be Zimbabwe, where the issue is either having the country go to ruin or giving the white man back his farms, and i personally would have those farms permanently poisoned, blow up mines and burn the oilfields before doing so!) but sometimes enough simply is ENOUGH! The trade of human beings(and ESPECIALLY children)simply is just WRONG! The current "globalisation" maybe killing the white race(as if i would care?)but it's also destroying our economy and culture. Im willing to live without a white, European culture and a world, but this human trade also causes extreme misery, and destroyes our economy. It's destroying our LIVELYHOOD! It's KILLING US!

Our colored leaders have become all PAWNS! I dont care about "race" and i dont care about "culture" or "traditions" either, but the current "globalisation" is KILLING US, and im afraid if this goes on, a lot of people can no longer remain silent! They ARE NOT going to ram that garbage up our throats much longer! Not without A FIGHT!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's not that simple! Posted by: andrushka
Interesting topic
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Apr 4, 2007 3:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it not racist in itself to suggest that these people are Toms and whores for the white man? Do we hold non-white wing nuts to a higher standard than white ones due to our own subconscious racism?

Does the left have a romantic attachment to "people of color", and unrealistic expectations to go with it? That's an easy one, but...

I tend to think that the Dark Side is an equal opportunity employer, as long as you think like them. It's more about ideology, psychology and economics than race. But it's still kind of a grey area, which makes an interesting discussion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Interesting topic Posted by: Wacre
» RE: Interesting topic Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: Interesting topic Posted by: Wacre
This is why I chose the profession I did
Posted by: ISlamIslam on Apr 4, 2007 4:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This author writes with as much venom and bile as she accuses Malkin and d'Sousa of having. She is irrational and consumed with hatred toward those she sees as "race traitors." And I thought the Left believed that race is merely a social construct!

I made a conscious decision years ago to go into a profession (science and engineering) that is as far removed from racial issues as possible. Likewise with the neighborhood where I chose to buy a house, and with the friends and acquaintances I keep. I want to avoid those on both sides of the political spectrum who are so full of bile, anger, and resentment toward anyone who has a different opinion than theirs that they can't think straight.

This author is typical of the kind of person that I, and likely many millions of other white Americans, do everything possible on a daily basis to avoid having anything to do with. Leftists can impose speech codes and try to mandate equality of outcome all they want, but they can't force us to respect or voluntarily have anything to do with people such as this author.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What a dismal person you must be Posted by: ISlamIslam
» There is already a place for you Posted by: ISlamIslam
» Your post speaks for itself Posted by: ISlamIslam
» Hey Calypso ekipnrut! Posted by: ISlamIslam
Racism is a made in America problem
Posted by: robchapman on Apr 4, 2007 4:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IF there were no market for the above named writers racist fare, there would be no debate over it.

Forty years after the Kerner Commission report, racism in America remains a white problem.

When the masses get over white supremacy it will go away.

Robert Chapman
Lansing, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All Hype, No Clout, And Racist?
Posted by: hole11 on Apr 4, 2007 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
O'Reilly and Michelle Malkin are both catholic. He rides her about her inexperienced youth. That isn't a joke and she can't say anything back about it because it's true. Are they using her for gaining a color base? Pinoy people are probably just as likely to be republican than anything else because of Marcos and our right wing support of them.

Are they really anti-black, anti-asian, and anti-immigration? Probably. Are they pro-white and doing these things to keep their job? Probably.

Dick Morris and the rest of them haven't really done anything to stop or reduce any immigration or hated people out of existence. Just talk. O'Reilly too. Though he has changed from his Hard Copy hard hitting days. He isn't even doing a good job convincing people of their view points. They are on the way to being irrelevant as Britney Spears. And they know it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah Right!
Posted by: rwmk12 on Apr 4, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry.... but I really don't think that the secret enclaves of powerful whitemen really care about racism. They never have. Slavery was based upon the harsh realities of cold economic logic, not any kind of racial entitlement, since poor whites were living in similar conditions, and were also "slaves" under the conditions of indentured service. Any type of dialogue that talks about racism is really a type of doublethink. The reality is that rich white people don't give a shit about either poor blacks or poor whites. How many of the soldiers who have died in Iraq and Afhganistan have been white? There is no such thing as class loyalty among the Upperclasses. This is just an extension of the divide and conquer tactic employed in all eras of class warfare. So, are the Right using black newscasters to mask rightwing agendas with the veneer of political correctness/liberalism, yes, but I highly doubt it has anything to do with racial loyalty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yeah Right! Posted by: ALANHESTER
» RE: Yeah Right! Posted by: ekipnrut
» Divide and conquer Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Yeah Right! Posted by: thetruth07
» Did I reach you? Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties
Italians aren't 'white'? Yes, this is true for Southern Italians and
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Apr 4, 2007 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Silicians whose blood line was corrupted by the moorish and African influence but this doesn't apply to ALL Italians, particularly those in the Northern part of Italia. The author claims in the initial sentence that all Italians are 'non-white' and this is not true.
ps: I'm kidding (although those in N.Italy would agree with me) to point out how rascist the author, and those on the left, are. To view the world through a lense in which every person, activity, or transaction is viewed/filtered/identified as to race is in itself prejudgice and racism. Both for the 'right' or the 'left'. Likewise the racism of the 'self-hating' jew stereotype, and does the 'uncle tom' racism have a long history. I'm glad to see the progressive add a new rascism to the 'debate' the 'self-hating' oriental! Good job!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Indi/Pakis in the Military??
Posted by: fleurette on Apr 4, 2007 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like Kimberley, I always thought D'Souza's obsession with Black people had something to do with how his coloring was a tad bit too close for comfort. Mainly, instead of obsessing over the affairs of Black people, D'Souza needs to examine why his people do not serve in the military! What is up with that? I am from a military family and have several cousins and a brother in law who serves and I HAVE NEVER ENCOUNTERED AN INDIAN or PAKISTANI in the service. Our paper ran a memorial to all the people who have died serviing the US in the Iraqi war and not one is from either of those ethnic groups, including D'Souza's. Unless their name was Smith, Gonzalez or Lam!! America has given them so much, and so many opportunities, including the opportunity to get rich writing for think tanks; and yet he has not used his power to encourage his people , who are getting rich over here, to serve, what is up with that? "Why do Indians and Pakistanis hate America!!!" LOL!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Indi/Pakis in the Military?? Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» I hope the writers of "The Simpsons" read this Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
obnoxious is not the same as racist
Posted by: edith on Apr 4, 2007 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
malkin shoots her mouth off to insult people with regularity. she is a self-righteous verision of Ann Coulter, who, unlike Malkin, does not take herself, or anyone else for that matter, seriously. But as unpleaasant as Malkin is, and biased in that she ignores evidence to the contrary of her positions, she is not racist that I can see. Oppostition to affirmative action, or to particular versions of it, is not per se racist. What specific comments has she made that are racist?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: obnoxious is not the same as racist Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: obnoxious is not the same as racist Posted by: cardboardurinal
GOP: Grand Old Prejudice
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 4, 2007 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a 71-year-old white male born in Southern California and raised in Texas and Louisiana by liberal parents.

Because of their influence on my speech, I got the crap beat out of me in grade school because I talked like a “Yankee.” The painful experience taught me two things: speak with a Southern accent (which I learned quickly) and be empathetic to minorities.

I can spot racists 10 miles away. The rightwing Republican Party is filled with them, along with rich bigots, gun nuts, homophobes, hypocrites, fascists, control freaks, Confederate flag wavers—the Trent Lotts, Tom Delays, Jerry Falwells, Ralph Reeds, Bill Bennetts, Charlton Hestons, Duke Cumminghams, Ann Coulters, Rush Limbaughs, G. Gordon Liddys, Sean Hannities...the list goes on and on. Those assorted groups and individuals have one thing in common. They hate liberals with a passion, which I don’t understand.

According to my dictionary, liberal means being a “free-man, not restricted,” someone who “favors political reform.” My fifth great grandfather, John Scott, fits that description perfectly.

He, too, wanted unrestricted freedom and political reform. So in 1776, John left his Vermont farm with musket in hand and fought the British Redcoats. In my mind, John Scott and millions of Americans like him today -- modern liberals -- are the true patriots, not rightwing Republicans.

Liberals cherish individual freedom and will defend it to their deaths, if necessary. I think that’s admirable. Rightwing Republicans feel just the opposite. Listen to Talk Radio or watch Fox News, substitute “Jews” for “liberals” and you will get a taste of what Nazi Germany was like before WWII.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How very odd... Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: How very odd... Posted by: tweedster
» ah, tout le nez. Posted by: edith
Attacking minorities is BIG business...especially if you ARE a minority
Posted by: Kym525 on Apr 4, 2007 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And why not? Conservative whites know they can't get away with slandering minorities (or they're too cowardly to accept the fallout from what they say), so they'd rather let their chosen plantation minorities do all the dirty work for them.

It's not just Malkin (a second-rate Ann Coulter) or D'Souza (a guy who comes from a country where the caste system, bride burnings and honor killings are customary and are seldom, if ever, prosecuted), but Larry Elder (black syndicated talk show host), Jesse Lee Peterson (the far right's inarticulate media darling), Starr Parker (former welfare mom) and Alan Keyes (former presidential candidate and hard-line conservative) who've gained fame and fortune through endless attacks on minorities.

Listen to any of these folks long enough and one would swear that minorities have done absolutely NOTHING positive. Everything they say is negative or blown so far out of proportion as to be almost unrecognizable. Every social problem is laid at the doorstep of minorities, but don't look to any of these people for SOLUTIONS because there's no money in that.

Not that I expect for everyone, even those who share the same skin colour as I to believe the same way I do, and this may come as a newsflash to some, but not every black or brown person thinks alike or does the same things. I could even respect any of the above-mentioned people if their endless tireades about "what's wrong with black/brown/muslim/fill in the blank" were actually based on substance and not just screaming and shouting and name-calling. They're not interested in making the lives of minorities better; they're interested in their own self-interest.


Didn't Malcolm X say that if you're not a part of the solution, you're part of the problem?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The price of adopting white culture
Posted by: Lesha on Apr 4, 2007 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All people (especially blacks) when exsposed to white culture of any kind will to some degree suffer from what is described in the article. Regardless if it is from slavery, colonization or a friendly exchange of cultures, non-white people all over the world exhibit these behavior traits.

In the Middle East in countries such as North and South Arabia (Yemen) along with other countries in North Africa like Sudan, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Libya and a host of others. The blacks in these countries suffer from self hatred cause by white supremacy in the form of Arabism. These confused souls will defend their white ideology to the end to have their place in the Arab society. White culture also affects Non-whites (blacks and Indians) in Latin America who will also defend their place among their former white slave masters (The Spaniards) in exchange of reconignition. The following Also occurs in India with their caste system and in most of Asia to a lesser degree.

The point is that unlike other cultures, when one adopts white culture (European), they are accepting a culture that is designed to teach people hate to themselves while skillfully promoting themselves as the ideal people with all the answers to our problems but in reality are cause of all of their problems even in a indirect way.

Sooner or later people will figure this out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Music is my drug of choice Posted by: Kym525
» Oh Puh-leeze Posted by: Kym525
» RE: Oh Puh-leeze Posted by: neosoul
» RE: Oh Puh-leeze Posted by: Kym525
» RE: Oh Puh-leeze Posted by: Lesha
» Oh and one last thing Posted by: Kym525
» RE: Oh and one last thing Posted by: Lesha
» RE: Oh and one last thing Posted by: Kym525
"White people are never "inconvenienced" by raced based incarceration"
Posted by: suprmark on Apr 4, 2007 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tell that to all the German-Americans or Italian-Americans who were also put in internment camps during WWII.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Latest Example
Posted by: NoPCZone on Apr 4, 2007 11:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From Faux Newz Channel
"Harold Ford, Jr. is a political contributor who will provide political commentary and analysis on international events and the 2008 election.

Ford served Tennessee in the United States Congress for 10 years. Described by President Bill Clinton as "the walking, living embodiment of where America ought to go in the 21st century," Ford is now a Professor of Public Policy at Vanderbilt University, Chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council and Vice Chairman of Merrill Lynch."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

as white america falls.......
Posted by: eosrk on Apr 4, 2007 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the rest of the world moves up.....and on!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why it's only one race hated the most ?
Posted by: luffy28 on Apr 4, 2007 3:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sometime's when I go out Whites and Asians (Together) give me racist looks. Why is this ? Did David Duke invite them (asians) to the klan ? He and they (kkk) might even consider them (asians) equals ? Maybe they (asians and indians) don't have to deal with racism at in this whole entire world ?

This story is very good but I do respect Jesse Lee Peterson. Some of the things he says is right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Money
Posted by: opeluboy on Apr 4, 2007 5:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some people will do or say anything for it. Quislings are always to be found.

Like the now-atheist-once-Muslim Ayaan Hirsi Ali who has been making the rounds on the "liberal" talk shows and comedy "news" dumping on Islam. Think she has a hard time getting booked?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» She's liable to be killed for speaking out. Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
Ms Malkin
Posted by: gellero on Apr 4, 2007 6:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michelle is so cute. She's just not a stooge of the welfare - federalist lobby. Is that why she's hated so much?? Perhaps someone out there in cyberspace would copy and paste the very worst of her venom ???? Hisssssssssssssssssss The rest of the world wants to see it......be brave.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't just talk about the blacks being victims, these 2 rightwingers are ruining the Asian Americans
Posted by: maxpayne on Apr 4, 2007 8:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as well. Most Asian Americans are nowhere near the rightwing lunacy of those two mentioned in this article. Yes, only 4 out of 7 Asian Americans go Democratic but of the 3 of 7 that go Republican, 2 of them are likely the typical economic conservative but socially liberal type.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't forget Ramesh Ponnuru
Posted by: lessbread on Apr 4, 2007 8:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Stewart could barely keep a straight face when Ponnuru went on the Daily Show to push his book lambasting the Democrats as "the party of death."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Are Whites Obsessed With Race?
Posted by: yehudasf on Apr 4, 2007 9:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cordially despise the "plantation massa" mentality of so many leftists. The condescending "vote like massa tell you & massa make sure you gets some set asides, welfares & food stamps" all the while doing everything possible to keep those who are both poor & ethnic as a powerless, but useful voting block. I have never been called "uppity", or accused of "Tommin'" by any right wing folk, only by leftist elitests who cannot stand to have their ingrained prejudices challenged. Because I am light skinned (high-yella in the vernacular), it is immediately assumed that I must have bought into the "white is right" mentality. What absolute garbage. What I have bought into is that no person who expects that someone else will provide them with the means of freedom & support for the rest of their days, is ever going to be really free or economically sound. Personal responsibility is something that all persons must accept, & stop whinging over imagined slights. Why in the world one would want to live the constant role of "helpless victim" is far beyond me. Simply observe the (highly above average) accession to middle class status of black Americans over the last 25 years, & the bullsh*tery & race hucksterism of the J.Jacksons & A. Sharptons of the world is exposed for just what it is, a self-serving power-ploy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

every camp has its kapos
Posted by: davidg on Apr 5, 2007 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every camp has its Kapos. They come in all shapes, sizes an colours. Remember Roy Cohn. It won't stop. Neither will the resistance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: every camp has its kapos Posted by: yehudasf
Should (or could) blacks or other people of color be conservatives in good conscience?
Posted by: Fantasyartist on Apr 5, 2007 8:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personally , I would say yes-as distasteful as the likes of Michelle Malkin, Dinesh D'Souza( to say nothing of Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter and other "wingnutss) are to me.
It is the height of racism to say or claim that only white men have the right to hold whatever politics they do, whilest minorities and women must swear an oath to never stray off the ideological reservation) despite what even D'Souza and Limbaugh concede that the right wing's approach to racial equality is "lukewarm" to say the least(pace Malcolm X's celebrated quip that "conservatives say lets keep the n----rs in their place whereas liberals say "no,no, let's keep the knee-grows in their place!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This just in...scum/douche bag menage a trois:NastyORama!!
Posted by: ekipnrut on Apr 5, 2007 12:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Warning: Meal spoiler..do not read within 2 hrs of next meal.
..it appears as if they do more than merely 'flock' together...
From Wiki:
Prior to his marriage, D'Souza had relationships with two well-known female conservatives, Laura Ingraham, a nationally-syndicated radio commentator to whom he was engaged but never married, and best-selling conservative author and commentator Ann Coulter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1940 WAS THE YEAR ITALIANS WERE DEEMED WHITE
Posted by: thetruth07 on Apr 6, 2007 1:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the book "THE RACE MYTH" by Joseph L. Graves, Jr:
"Princeton psychologist Carl Brigham wrote the most influential book on the social significance of the army tests entitled: A Study of American Intelligence in 1923. Madison Grant heavily influenced Brigham's thinking on race. (Madison Grant, an amateur zoologist and New York society man. Grant would serve as the treasurer of the second (1921) and third (1932) International Congresses of Eugenics, cofound the Galton Society, serve as president of the Eugenics Research Association, and cofound the American Eugenics Society. Grant was a vicious anti-Semite and in 1916 wrote one of the early twentieth century's most influential pieces of scientific racism, The Passing of the Great Race. Grant felt that the immigration of Irish, Italians, and Jews had pushed Americe to the brink of racial degeneration. He felt that all that was fine and good in the world was the result of the efforts of the Nordic race).
Brigham concluded that the army tests showed the intellectual superiority of the Nordic over the Alpine, Mediterranean, and "Negro" races. Brigham felt that the superior performance of northern Negroes in the army intelligence tests was the result of their greater admixture of white blood compare to the southern Negro, along with other social environmental factors such as better education, higher wages, better living conditions, and less complete social ostracism. He also felt that the amount of Nordic blood predicted the performance of the white races on the test. Without any physical anthropological evidence to support his claims, Brigham ranked the percentages of Nordic blood in the European races. The five highest were, in order: Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands, and Scotland. Amazingly, Brigham thought that the Germans were only 40 percent Nordic and 60 percent Alpine. The lowest percentages of Nordic ancestry was found in the following races, in descending order: Portugeuse, Russian, Italians, Greeks, and Turks. He predicted that the decline in American intelligence would be much faster than the decline in Europe, due mainly to the presence of the "Negro" in America.
The champions of racial inferiority, William Shockley, Arthur Jensen, and others claimed that the Negro was genetically less educable than whites, while simultaneously reproducing faster than whites. They raised the spector of genetic enslavement for a substantial portion of the new America, due to untrammeled black reproduction.
By this time, the eugenicists had changed their tune concerning who or who was not white. The social changes wrought by the New Deal and WWII had redefined whiteness in America. Groups such as the Irish, Italians, Poles, and Russians that Brigham deemed intellectually inferior and no better than Negroes had been assimilated into whiteness. In his 1924 report on immigrations to congress, Harry Hamilton Laughlin, of the Eugenics Record Office (ERO), had actually ranked the intelligence of Nothern American Negroes above Russians, Italians, and Poles. He ranked Negro officers third on the hierarchy of groups possessing superior intelligence, after white commissioned and noncommissioned officers.
The intelligence ranking descended from there, following Brigham's scheme of the percentage of Nordic blood in each race. We could no longer speak of an unchallenged Anglo-Saxon dominance of American social and economic life. Whiteness now referred to ancestry in any of the European countries as opposed to in Africa, the Middle East, or Asia. Consequently, modern psychometricists no longer broke down the white population into subraces when comparing them to Negroes or Hispanics." So 1940 was the year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The gig pays well for D'sousa, Malkin and the other "Jesse"
Posted by: neosoul on Apr 6, 2007 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Right has always paid well for minorities to slam because like one right-wing operative said, "It would sound racist coming from a white guy". So they hire minority spokesman like Malkin and D'Sousa not because of their ideas but because they say what the right thinks on racial issues and they believe it themselves because if they didn't why would AEI or News Corp keep them in their employ. Malkin and D'Sousa are dark- skinned south asians where skin color matters, so of course they are thankful because in their home countries they could only aspire so high in those social and career circles in their home countries.

In America they are the darlings of the right wing because they discovered while America may not like them, the vast majority of Americans hate Black Americans even more and have parlayed their ethnicity into a very profitable career. Their writings on race are so full of intellectual dishonesty it would make Satan blush, but all's fair when it comes to making money because poor blacks can't fight back. The "Reverend" Jesse Lee Peterson is the new minority lackey on the payroll of the GOP intellectual circles, but unlike the prior two he can't put together a sentence to save his life but in his role as the self- hating negro , he bashes blacks cultural and social morality even more and meets with David Duke. Not bad for a black country boy who doesn't even lead a chruch or parrish.

It's a great gig for a self- loathing minority if you can get it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For all you Clinton lovers...AND BONUS!! self hating race traitor NB exposed
Posted by: ekipnrut on Apr 7, 2007 5:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get it through your heads people... the presence of self hating filth in our midst can have devastating CONCRETE ramifications..it's not some abstract thing of 'they're sorta out there' with no harm done... NO!...the oppressor uses their self hate to our profound (continuing) disadvantage.....
From Skeptical Brotha blog 11/29/06:
I feel brotha Barron on that. The NYPD has a problem and the only solution is for a federally apointed monitor to take over administration of the NYPD. According to a law review article in Fordham Urban Law Journal in January of 2003 “The Failure of Local and Federal Prosecutors to Curb Police Brutality” by Asit Panwala, ”As a result of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, federal authorites now have the ability to change how local police departments operate. The law empowers the Department of Justice to force police departments to implement internal review systems or to enjoin them from allowing officers to use deadly [force]. … The Justice Department may be better suited to handle police brutality because it has both the power to prosecute individual officers and to force a police department to change its pattern of practice…just the mere threat of a federal lawsuit may provide the needed push for reform within a law enforcement agency.”
During the Clinton Administration, just such a process of federal examination was being urged by Human Rights Watch and progressive African American leaders and it was killed by a stealth Aunt Jemima in the form of U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch. Carl Thomas, the attorney for Abner Louima, the Haitian immigrant sodomized in a NYPD police precinct bathroom by racist rogue cops, said of Lynch, “she is to be blamed for not aggressively pursuing blantant police misconduct.”
Echoing sentiments by NY City Councilman Charles Barron, Attorney General Janet Reno, and the President himself had the power to force a federal takeover of the NYPD and mandate necessary reforms. It was not done and they used a high level black flunky to do it. This is what unquestioning support for DLC democrats gets black folks. The only agenda for New York the Clintons had in mind was Hillary’s election to the Senate.
The time has come to flip the script and demand accountability. Sean Bell, and those who have suffered at the hands of NYPD rogue cops deserve a pound a flesh for the Clintons betrayal.

Here's the thing: If , God forbid , Hillary wins in '08...like reanimated vampire ghouls..all kinds of vermin will come slithering out from whatever law practice lair they've been
in for the last few years ...sniffing around for appointments to the Federal bench or the Justice Department, i.e. they would then have the power to inflict tremendous damage ....
so it is CRUCIAL that this type of stuff be REMEMBERED
if and when those nominations come up..via Clinton or anyone else...So people can 'just- absolutely- freak- the- F- out' in
protest , thereby (hopefully)blocking the appointment(s).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement