COMMENTS: 76
Kill the Messenger: The Tragic Life of Gary Webb
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.
With "Kill the Messenger" (Nation Books/Avalon), Nick Schou, an editor at Orange County Weekly, provides a meticulous, balanced account of the life of Gary Webb, the former San Jose Mercury News reporter who, despite minor errors, basically got it right when he wrote the biggest story of his career. That story lifted the rug on a historical episode the mainstream media didn't want to touch: How the Central Intelligence Agency turned a blind eye to drug dealing in furtherance of its covert support for the Nicaraguan contras. For his efforts, Webb was hounded out of journalism after a ferocious assault from America's most prestigious newspapers, which Schou documents in painstaking and shameful detail. When Webb -- who had once shared a Pulitzer Prize for his reporting -- committed suicide in December 2004, it was the last chapter in a real-life American tragedy.
Webb was not the first one on to the story. AP reporter Robert Parry had been forced out of his job at the wire service for pursuing it. The U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Narcotics and Terrorism, chaired by Sen. John Kerry, conducted an investigation into the contras' drug trafficking in 1987-88 that had documented (among other things) how CIA cargo planes ferried arms to the contras and then carried cocaine back to military bases and remote airfields on the return flights. But, as Schou notes, "Because of its sensitive nature, the committee … sealed most of the testimony, and Kerry's investigation got scant play in the national news media."
The Kerry investigation was mainly concerned with cocaine coming into the U.S. East Coast. Webb's 1996 series for the Mercury News, based on a yearlong investigation, looked at the cocaine traffic in Los Angeles, which was then known as "the crack capital of the world." Webb detailed how "Freeway" Ricky Ross, the first '80s crack millionaire and a crack kingpin in L.A.'s South Central neighborhood, had been supplied with crack cocaine by Nicaraguan exiles and contra supporters with CIA connections. Webb discovered an affidavit from the L.A. County Sheriff's Department that said that the coke profits of Ross' suppliers "are transported to Florida and laundered through … a chain of banks in Florida. … From this bank the monies are filtered to the Contra rebels to buy arms in the war in Nicaragua."
Webb's articles, however, were unjustifiably hyped by the Mercury News' editors, who, according to Schou, were hungry to compete with the media Big Boys. The series ran with war-sized headlines and a silhouette of a man smoking a crack pipe superimposed on the official seal of the CIA. "Dark Alliance: The Story Behind the Crack Explosion," screamed the paper, with a subhead claiming that "Crack Plague's Roots Are in Nicaraguan War."
The story got away from Webb and took on a life of its own, fueled by anger and despair in black communities being destroyed by the crack epidemic and the lethal gang wars surrounding it. As Schou puts it, "Dark Alliance" created an alliance of conspiracy theorists, from some "on the left who believed the CIA had deliberately started the crack epidemic to commit genocide against black people" to "right-wing followers of Lyndon LaRouche, who saw the story as further proof that George Bush Sr. and the Queen of England belong to a secret cabal that controls the planet." Opportunistic politicians like Rep. Cynthia McKinney, D-Ga. -- who exclaimed on the floor of Congress that "CIA" stood for "Central Intoxication Agency" -- seized on Webb's story to grab headlines for themselves. The "Dark Alliance" series quickly became a national cause célebre.
The Los Angeles Times -- embarrassingly scooped on its own turf by Webb -- reacted by assigning no less than two dozen reporters to what one of them described as the "Get Gary Webb Team," running a takedown series on the "Dark Alliance" stories that dwarfed them in size. The Washington Post and the New York Times piled on with multiple stories discrediting not just what Webb had written, but Webb himself, delving into his past to come up with mud to throw. Most of these papers' "deconstructions" of Webb's reporting were based on unnamed government sources. But the damage was done. In the end, the very Mercury News editors who'd made exaggerated claims for Webb's series publicly disowned him in an editorial while refusing to print stories Webb wrote further documenting his series. Demoted to a remote police beat, Webb left the paper.
Unable to get another reporting job on any U.S. daily, his marriage destroyed by the intensity of his "Dark Alliance" experience, a depressed Webb killed himself. In Schou's telling, he was the victim of incompetent editors and of a media feeding frenzy that the Washington Post's own ombudsman later described as misplaced. Throughout Kill the Messenger, Schou does fresh reporting that bolsters some of Webb's findings. He also interviews some of those who helped incinerate Webb and who now admit they went overboard. The book is an important cautionary tale for anyone considering a career in investigative journalism. And the moral is: It's often dangerous to speak truth to power.
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: werewolf on Oct 13, 2006 2:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Freedom of speech ONLY on paper!
Posted by: werewolf
» Take a good look at the man who really assassinated Gary Webb:
Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» The editor who betrayed Garry Webb.
Posted by: off-the-radar 2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 13, 2006 2:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Better to die on your feet than to live on your knees
Posted by: thoughtcriminal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ghoulman on Oct 13, 2006 4:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I loved how his suiside was reported; with TWO gun shots to the head. Yeeeaaaaaaa.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hahaha, your kidding, right??? I had no idea there were two gunshots, that is hilarious....
Posted by: Prophit
» Assasination is an American value
Posted by: jreinhart1
» Gary was assassinated by Jerry Ceppos
Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: "Do What He Did"
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
Comments are closed-
Posted by: commonMan on Oct 13, 2006 4:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Exactly!
Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
» Agree: 'Incompetence' is democrats' favorite word.
Posted by: JP2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lauren on Oct 13, 2006 5:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His suicide terrified me. I read about his suicide a couple of weeks after it happened. Terrifying or terrorizing? I was scared, really scared. (See, terrorism works!)
At this time I was just starting to 'come out' and gettin A LOT of negitive attention.
My hubby, as usual, believed the mainstream press on this one, we had a terrific fight about that. He used to be a reporter and yet always seems to take the consertive, fully digested and presented as fact, view on stories like this. I don't understand that kneejerk response, but the world is full of it.
Thanks for priniting the review and reminding me how far our entire community has come in 2 years.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Not to be paranoid, but...
Posted by: BurtonLT
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Prophit on Oct 13, 2006 5:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no evidence to the contrary, but there is sufficient coincidences to cause questioning of such an event.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: werewolf on Oct 13, 2006 5:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And know why he was killed? Read below form the same story:
"Lloyd and the three other ITN crew members were some of the few Western reporters who covered the fighting on their own, while most others were embedded with U.S. or British forces"
The embedded journalists are censored by the US Military while the ITN journalists were independant and, therefore, could report the whole truth about the War which US/UK wanted to hide. All independant journalists who may have had ideas to cover the war truthfully had to be given a dreadful warning by a murderous EXAMPLE at the very beginning itself.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Pre-meditated killing
Posted by: This Old Brit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cielo on Oct 13, 2006 6:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» One More:
Posted by: makeadifference
» Hunter Checked Out When He Wanted To
Posted by: edith
» Thanks!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: Thanks!
Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: "Suicide" and plane crashes
Posted by: hankgeorge
Comments are closed-
Posted by: StuartH on Oct 13, 2006 7:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Getting access to the streetcorner drug scene was not very difficult. People were wary, suspicious and potentially violent, but available. Access to private rural airstrips was something else.
The editors I was dealing with were supportive, but the very real prospect of being sued by people with a lot of money to spend on lawyers was very scary. Most independent or alternative newspapers are marginal operations. A bullshit lawsuit might not win, but it would drain enough resources to hurt and possibly undermine the business.
At the time I didn't pick up on a CIA connection, but it was possible to figure out that people who could deal in millions of dollars under the table were not working class people. One person who actually got convicted for drug dealing was a land speculator who borrowed typically large amounts of money just before a recession. The interest payments were very high and drug importing was a tempting way to cover them.
In that context, where important people with a lot of money were getting very tempted to deal in planeloads of crack, it wouldn't be very hard for the CIA to be involved. One could be suspicious why small planes headed for certain rural airstrips owned by "above reproach" wealthy citizens were ignored by border monitoring radar.
Webb went a step beyond being suspicious and actually found a way to tell the hidden story. He was a true hero and I hope this book makes that clear to more people.
Another journalist I know, was a brilliant young reporter for the university daily newspaper. He went down to Mexico after he graduated to make his mark by investigating collusion by the police in drug dealing along the border. Before too long, he was arrested, with drugs planted, and put in a Mexican jail. It took a year for his family to get the bribes together for his release, but by that time he had developed a brain fever that left him so brain damaged he couldn't pull his thoughts together well enough to recognize friends or his mother.
Yes, investigative reporting can be dangerous. That only underscores the courage needed to delve in hidden truths, and how miraculous accomplishments like those of Gary Webb are.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Big Screen
Posted by: edith
» RE: A Gary Webb Experience
Posted by: sr
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Oct 13, 2006 7:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now the derivatives markets have a nominal value 10 times greater than the GDP of the world. Another Long Term Captial default and the system collapses like a house of cards, the price of commodities will soar and the dollar will take on the value of toliet paper.
In the main line media, the only one close to telling the truth was legendary investor Jim Rogers, who got the boot from CNBC in favor of Larry Kudlow, a financial version of a yellow smiling face.
Let's see what these clowns have to say when disaster hits.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There's plenty more that's not covered
Posted by: rockpicker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fool-on-the-hill on Oct 13, 2006 7:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HOW THE %$#^*& DOES A PERSON FIRE TWO SHOTS INTO HIS OWN BRAIN???!!
Any firearms afficianadoes out there who can explain this to me? (Please DON'T spout any nonsense about "reflex actions" quicker than a bullet!)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Um-m-m, about that "suicide"...
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Um-m-m, about that "suicide"...
Posted by: spacemarine83
» Absolutely impossible, since its difficult when in total control to fight the reflex action of a sho
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rwa on Oct 13, 2006 7:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
David Blunkett, the UK's former home secretary, has said that during the 2003 invasion of Iraq he suggested to Tony Blair that Britain's military should bomb Aljazeera's television transmitter in Baghdad.
Aljazeera television said on Thursday that Blunkett's claims - made in an interview with Britain's Channel 4 television to be aired on Monday - support its belief that the US and Britain deliberately bombed its Baghdad offices during the war.
Ahmed al-Sheikh, editor-in-chief of Aljazeera's Arabic channel, said; "This adds to the growing number of evidences that will one day prove that the attack on Aljazeera was premeditated ... at the highest levels.
"Aljazeera was being targeted at the time because the people who were waging war on Iraq didn't like what it was showing."
Two weeks after Blunkett pressed the prime minister to attack Aljazeera, the American military bombed the station's Baghdad offices, killing journalist Tareq Ayoub.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 13, 2006 10:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This dynamic was also present in Vietnam. Let's recall what a Burmese general had to say during the Vietnam war, when the CIA was covertly arming Hmong hill tribes in the easter mountains of Vietnam: "To fight, you need weapons, and to buy weapons, you need money - and in these hills, the only money is opium".
Incidentally, check this story (2004) Hmong deer hunter kills 8 in Wisconsin. Here was a guy who was used by the US govt, fled to the United States, and was then subjected to racist taunts - his response was hardly surprising.
By the way, I knew the head of a Bay Area airline insurance company who was approached by the CIA, along with many other area pilots, in the late 60's about flying into Eastern Vietnam for unspecified purposes - the pay was phenomenal, but he turned it down (for obvious reasons).
But to take this up to the present day, the exact same thing is going on in Afghanistan. US, Canadian and British troops moving in made alliance with regional anti-Taliban warlords, all of whom were involved in heroin and opium traffic. Opium cultivation is now booming, and apparently even the Taliban are now supporting it - they need money to buy guns and ammo as well. There are also geostrageic implications:
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~pdscott/qdimu.html
"In the present case, most of the opium and heroin exiting Afghanistan now flows north into the oil-and-gas-rich states of Central Asia where the US seeks to gain influence. This traffic is chiefly controlled by the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), an overtly Islamist terrorist group that is said to have threatened (in conjunction with bin Laden, as I have reported elsewhere ) the offices of US oil companies in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan.
Despite these facts, the relationship between the US and the IMU is far too complex to make the IMU an obvious target for the US "war against terror." If the CIA, via its sister agency the Pakistan ISI, can maintain a degree of control over the drug flow reaching the IMU, this confers a degree of influence over not just the IMU but the Government of Uzbekistan."
Gary Webb got it right, and the three US major dailys - the NYT, the WP, and the LAT - well, let's just say that they often serve as little more than the mouthpiece of the government.
I think if we knew the whole story, there'd be a lynch mob chasing the Bushes down the street.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Is the story repeating in Afghanistan?
Posted by: fiskhus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pixiequix on Oct 13, 2006 11:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Webb's DVD Commentary
Posted by: insulaparadigm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: paschn on Oct 13, 2006 11:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A nation of sheep,led by a cartel of whores, controlled by big business. Welcome,...to the REAL Evil Empire.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Some country huh?
Posted by: christii
» It wasn't Reagan, it was Bush Sr. who ran the country then.
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lessbread on Oct 13, 2006 12:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Finally...
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» Very few things in life are sure.
Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Very few things in life are sure.
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aonghus36 on Oct 13, 2006 1:33 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We must keep looking outside our own country
Posted by: thoughtcriminal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Douglas on Oct 13, 2006 4:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why Was It "Opportunistic" Of Cynthia McKinney To Publicize Webb's Story?
Posted by: jreinhart1
» RE: Why Was It "Opportunistic" Of Cynthia McKinney To Publicize Webb's Story?
Posted by: Izzy Stoner
» Your Comment Suggests You Are Addicted to "Conspiracism"
Posted by: Douglas
» RE: Your Comment Suggests You Are Addicted to "Conspiracism"
Posted by: JMorse
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rwa on Oct 13, 2006 6:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "liberals" and "supremicists" are oxymorons...... I find that statement...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: "Liberals" and "Supremicists" are Oxymorons...... Are You Sure????
Posted by: Douglas
» I didn't say there weren't inconsistancy in some positions taken by the left, but to .......
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: I didn't say there weren't inconsistancy in some positions taken by the left, but to .......
Posted by: Douglas
» We don't need Bozo the Klown
Posted by: edith
» Name calling detracts from your points. However, I listened to McKinney at hearings ....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hal on Oct 13, 2006 7:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is arrant garbage. It can’t even qualify as limited hangout.
Webb was leaned on by an entire DC-MSM brothel in the employ of corporate crime. His marriage and life were “destroyed” by a Murder Inc that makes any common mafia look quaint.
“War on drugs” is phony as “war on terror”. But with over a trillion dollars a year cooked and washed thru money center banks and Fortune 100 companies every year – that should be no surprise. A bulk of the “war on drugs” blood money trade is (of course) CIA controlled for the usual suspects.
And a “suicide” with 2 bullets to the head? That says it all.
* "Defrauding America" by Rodney Stich, which documents ongoing
CIA and DEA narcotics trafficking
* "White Lies: The CIA, Drugs and the Press" by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair on the long twisted history of CIA narcotics
trafficking and media coverups.
* "The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade"
by Alfred W. McCoy, which documents CIA sanctioned drug dealing since the Vietnam War.
* "Dark Alliance: The CIA, The Contras and the Crack Cocaine Explosion"
by Gary Webb, on the facts of CIA drug traffickers, which Hitz's
Inspector General report suppressed
* "The Big White Lie: The CIA and the Cocaine/Crack Epidemic" by
Michael Levine, a veteran DEA undercover agent for 25 years who
stumbled into CIA protected narcotics trafficking in South America.
* "Drugging America" by Rodney Stich, a former federal investigator
who documents decades of CIA drug trafficking and the phoney War on Drugs
* "Powderburns: Cocaine, Contras and the Drug War" by DEA agent
Celerino Castillo III and Dave Harmon who write about US Government
collaboration with drug smugglers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: MURDER INC @ AMERIKA
Posted by: sr
Comments are closed-
Posted by: codybryan on Oct 13, 2006 8:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone here really think that we would support regimes that oppress working class people in other countries, and not bring those policies back home?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: insulaparadigm on Oct 13, 2006 11:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
combo it all with some clandestine operations from our governnnet... dangerous mix.
If this all was out to all the public - what would we do about it?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: I3IVIIVI on Oct 14, 2006 6:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people I know who know Gary Webb say it was a suicide.
But the larger point is that it was a media assassination years before, not individuals going 'over the top' who are now vaguely apologetic for helping destroy a human being and better journalist than any of them have ever been, but a systemic response to truths that expose government and corporate evil (see the burying of the Cincinnati Enquirer's Chiquita banana exposé for another textbook case).
And off-hand slander against Cynthia McKinney adds to the feeling that this review is more about containing the damage to the establishment that Gary Webb's truths unleashed than it is in Webb's tradition of solid reporting exposing deep corruption.
Again, go here to see the series for yourself and keep looking around there for more on Gary Webb, and those who self-consciously try to continue on the path he was walking.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Does the "Off-Hand Slander" of Cynthia McKinney Seem As Contemptible To You As It Does To Me?
Posted by: Douglas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fiskhus on Oct 14, 2006 11:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Oct 15, 2006 1:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: insulaparadigm on Oct 17, 2006 12:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BurtonLT on Oct 19, 2006 3:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the 1960s the New Left promoted drug use as a way to expand one's mind and break free of the boundaries of society. Drugs and radical activism were intimately related.
So why has the left today suddenly "gotten religion" and joined in the anti-drug crusade? You'd think that the left would know better than to support the war on drugs, given the way that the war on drugs has torn up much of the Bill of Rights as well as being used as an excuse for the police to incarcerate the underclass.
So why does the left today do the PR work for the war on drugs by condemning the CIA for involvement in drug trafficking and spreading more fear of drug use?
Any thoughts on this?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sr on Nov 4, 2006 3:48 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sr on Nov 4, 2006 4:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sr on Jan 15, 2007 8:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sr on Jan 19, 2007 8:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: werewolf on Oct 13, 2006 2:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Freedom of speech ONLY on paper!
Posted by: werewolf
» Take a good look at the man who really assassinated Gary Webb:
Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» The editor who betrayed Garry Webb.
Posted by: off-the-radar 2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 13, 2006 2:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Better to die on your feet than to live on your knees
Posted by: thoughtcriminal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ghoulman on Oct 13, 2006 4:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I loved how his suiside was reported; with TWO gun shots to the head. Yeeeaaaaaaa.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hahaha, your kidding, right??? I had no idea there were two gunshots, that is hilarious....
Posted by: Prophit
» Assasination is an American value
Posted by: jreinhart1
» Gary was assassinated by Jerry Ceppos
Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: "Do What He Did"
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
Comments are closed-
Posted by: commonMan on Oct 13, 2006 4:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Exactly!
Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
» Agree: 'Incompetence' is democrats' favorite word.
Posted by: JP2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lauren on Oct 13, 2006 5:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His suicide terrified me. I read about his suicide a couple of weeks after it happened. Terrifying or terrorizing? I was scared, really scared. (See, terrorism works!)
At this time I was just starting to 'come out' and gettin A LOT of negitive attention.
My hubby, as usual, believed the mainstream press on this one, we had a terrific fight about that. He used to be a reporter and yet always seems to take the consertive, fully digested and presented as fact, view on stories like this. I don't understand that kneejerk response, but the world is full of it.
Thanks for priniting the review and reminding me how far our entire community has come in 2 years.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Not to be paranoid, but...
Posted by: BurtonLT
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Prophit on Oct 13, 2006 5:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no evidence to the contrary, but there is sufficient coincidences to cause questioning of such an event.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: werewolf on Oct 13, 2006 5:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And know why he was killed? Read below form the same story:
"Lloyd and the three other ITN crew members were some of the few Western reporters who covered the fighting on their own, while most others were embedded with U.S. or British forces"
The embedded journalists are censored by the US Military while the ITN journalists were independant and, therefore, could report the whole truth about the War which US/UK wanted to hide. All independant journalists who may have had ideas to cover the war truthfully had to be given a dreadful warning by a murderous EXAMPLE at the very beginning itself.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Pre-meditated killing
Posted by: This Old Brit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cielo on Oct 13, 2006 6:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» One More:
Posted by: makeadifference
» Hunter Checked Out When He Wanted To
Posted by: edith
» Thanks!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: Thanks!
Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: "Suicide" and plane crashes
Posted by: hankgeorge
Comments are closed-
Posted by: StuartH on Oct 13, 2006 7:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Getting access to the streetcorner drug scene was not very difficult. People were wary, suspicious and potentially violent, but available. Access to private rural airstrips was something else.
The editors I was dealing with were supportive, but the very real prospect of being sued by people with a lot of money to spend on lawyers was very scary. Most independent or alternative newspapers are marginal operations. A bullshit lawsuit might not win, but it would drain enough resources to hurt and possibly undermine the business.
At the time I didn't pick up on a CIA connection, but it was possible to figure out that people who could deal in millions of dollars under the table were not working class people. One person who actually got convicted for drug dealing was a land speculator who borrowed typically large amounts of money just before a recession. The interest payments were very high and drug importing was a tempting way to cover them.
In that context, where important people with a lot of money were getting very tempted to deal in planeloads of crack, it wouldn't be very hard for the CIA to be involved. One could be suspicious why small planes headed for certain rural airstrips owned by "above reproach" wealthy citizens were ignored by border monitoring radar.
Webb went a step beyond being suspicious and actually found a way to tell the hidden story. He was a true hero and I hope this book makes that clear to more people.
Another journalist I know, was a brilliant young reporter for the university daily newspaper. He went down to Mexico after he graduated to make his mark by investigating collusion by the police in drug dealing along the border. Before too long, he was arrested, with drugs planted, and put in a Mexican jail. It took a year for his family to get the bribes together for his release, but by that time he had developed a brain fever that left him so brain damaged he couldn't pull his thoughts together well enough to recognize friends or his mother.
Yes, investigative reporting can be dangerous. That only underscores the courage needed to delve in hidden truths, and how miraculous accomplishments like those of Gary Webb are.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Big Screen
Posted by: edith
» RE: A Gary Webb Experience
Posted by: sr
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Oct 13, 2006 7:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now the derivatives markets have a nominal value 10 times greater than the GDP of the world. Another Long Term Captial default and the system collapses like a house of cards, the price of commodities will soar and the dollar will take on the value of toliet paper.
In the main line media, the only one close to telling the truth was legendary investor Jim Rogers, who got the boot from CNBC in favor of Larry Kudlow, a financial version of a yellow smiling face.
Let's see what these clowns have to say when disaster hits.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There's plenty more that's not covered
Posted by: rockpicker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fool-on-the-hill on Oct 13, 2006 7:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HOW THE %$#^*& DOES A PERSON FIRE TWO SHOTS INTO HIS OWN BRAIN???!!
Any firearms afficianadoes out there who can explain this to me? (Please DON'T spout any nonsense about "reflex actions" quicker than a bullet!)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Um-m-m, about that "suicide"...
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Um-m-m, about that "suicide"...
Posted by: spacemarine83
» Absolutely impossible, since its difficult when in total control to fight the reflex action of a sho
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rwa on Oct 13, 2006 7:50 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
David Blunkett, the UK's former home secretary, has said that during the 2003 invasion of Iraq he suggested to Tony Blair that Britain's military should bomb Aljazeera's television transmitter in Baghdad.
Aljazeera television said on Thursday that Blunkett's claims - made in an interview with Britain's Channel 4 television to be aired on Monday - support its belief that the US and Britain deliberately bombed its Baghdad offices during the war.
Ahmed al-Sheikh, editor-in-chief of Aljazeera's Arabic channel, said; "This adds to the growing number of evidences that will one day prove that the attack on Aljazeera was premeditated ... at the highest levels.
"Aljazeera was being targeted at the time because the people who were waging war on Iraq didn't like what it was showing."
Two weeks after Blunkett pressed the prime minister to attack Aljazeera, the American military bombed the station's Baghdad offices, killing journalist Tareq Ayoub.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 13, 2006 10:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This dynamic was also present in Vietnam. Let's recall what a Burmese general had to say during the Vietnam war, when the CIA was covertly arming Hmong hill tribes in the easter mountains of Vietnam: "To fight, you need weapons, and to buy weapons, you need money - and in these hills, the only money is opium".
Incidentally, check this story (2004) Hmong deer hunter kills 8 in Wisconsin. Here was a guy who was used by the US govt, fled to the United States, and was then subjected to racist taunts - his response was hardly surprising.
By the way, I knew the head of a Bay Area airline insurance company who was approached by the CIA, along with many other area pilots, in the late 60's about flying into Eastern Vietnam for unspecified purposes - the pay was phenomenal, but he turned it down (for obvious reasons).
But to take this up to the present day, the exact same thing is going on in Afghanistan. US, Canadian and British troops moving in made alliance with regional anti-Taliban warlords, all of whom were involved in heroin and opium traffic. Opium cultivation is now booming, and apparently even the Taliban are now supporting it - they need money to buy guns and ammo as well. There are also geostrageic implications:
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~pdscott/qdimu.html
"In the present case, most of the opium and heroin exiting Afghanistan now flows north into the oil-and-gas-rich states of Central Asia where the US seeks to gain influence. This traffic is chiefly controlled by the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU), an overtly Islamist terrorist group that is said to have threatened (in conjunction with bin Laden, as I have reported elsewhere ) the offices of US oil companies in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan.
Despite these facts, the relationship between the US and the IMU is far too complex to make the IMU an obvious target for the US "war against terror." If the CIA, via its sister agency the Pakistan ISI, can maintain a degree of control over the drug flow reaching the IMU, this confers a degree of influence over not just the IMU but the Government of Uzbekistan."
Gary Webb got it right, and the three US major dailys - the NYT, the WP, and the LAT - well, let's just say that they often serve as little more than the mouthpiece of the government.
I think if we knew the whole story, there'd be a lynch mob chasing the Bushes down the street.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Is the story repeating in Afghanistan?
Posted by: fiskhus
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pixiequix on Oct 13, 2006 11:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Webb's DVD Commentary
Posted by: insulaparadigm
Comments are closed-
Posted by: paschn on Oct 13, 2006 11:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A nation of sheep,led by a cartel of whores, controlled by big business. Welcome,...to the REAL Evil Empire.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Some country huh?
Posted by: christii
» It wasn't Reagan, it was Bush Sr. who ran the country then.
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lessbread on Oct 13, 2006 12:41 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Finally...
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» Very few things in life are sure.
Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Very few things in life are sure.
Posted by: yellow
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aonghus36 on Oct 13, 2006 1:33 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We must keep looking outside our own country
Posted by: thoughtcriminal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Douglas on Oct 13, 2006 4:21 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why Was It "Opportunistic" Of Cynthia McKinney To Publicize Webb's Story?
Posted by: jreinhart1
» RE: Why Was It "Opportunistic" Of Cynthia McKinney To Publicize Webb's Story?
Posted by: Izzy Stoner
» Your Comment Suggests You Are Addicted to "Conspiracism"
Posted by: Douglas
» RE: Your Comment Suggests You Are Addicted to "Conspiracism"
Posted by: JMorse
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rwa on Oct 13, 2006 6:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "liberals" and "supremicists" are oxymorons...... I find that statement...
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: "Liberals" and "Supremicists" are Oxymorons...... Are You Sure????
Posted by: Douglas
» I didn't say there weren't inconsistancy in some positions taken by the left, but to .......
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: I didn't say there weren't inconsistancy in some positions taken by the left, but to .......
Posted by: Douglas
» We don't need Bozo the Klown
Posted by: edith
» Name calling detracts from your points. However, I listened to McKinney at hearings ....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hal on Oct 13, 2006 7:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is arrant garbage. It can’t even qualify as limited hangout.
Webb was leaned on by an entire DC-MSM brothel in the employ of corporate crime. His marriage and life were “destroyed” by a Murder Inc that makes any common mafia look quaint.
“War on drugs” is phony as “war on terror”. But with over a trillion dollars a year cooked and washed thru money center banks and Fortune 100 companies every year – that should be no surprise. A bulk of the “war on drugs” blood money trade is (of course) CIA controlled for the usual suspects.
And a “suicide” with 2 bullets to the head? That says it all.
* "Defrauding America" by Rodney Stich, which documents ongoing
CIA and DEA narcotics trafficking
* "White Lies: The CIA, Drugs and the Press" by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair on the long twisted history of CIA narcotics
trafficking and media coverups.
* "The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade"
by Alfred W. McCoy, which documents CIA sanctioned drug dealing since the Vietnam War.
* "Dark Alliance: The CIA, The Contras and the Crack Cocaine Explosion"
by Gary Webb, on the facts of CIA drug traffickers, which Hitz's
Inspector General report suppressed
* "The Big White Lie: The CIA and the Cocaine/Crack Epidemic" by
Michael Levine, a veteran DEA undercover agent for 25 years who
stumbled into CIA protected narcotics trafficking in South America.
* "Drugging America" by Rodney Stich, a former federal investigator
who documents decades of CIA drug trafficking and the phoney War on Drugs
* "Powderburns: Cocaine, Contras and the Drug War" by DEA agent
Celerino Castillo III and Dave Harmon who write about US Government
collaboration with drug smugglers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: MURDER INC @ AMERIKA
Posted by: sr
Comments are closed-
Posted by: codybryan on Oct 13, 2006 8:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone here really think that we would support regimes that oppress working class people in other countries, and not bring those policies back home?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: insulaparadigm on Oct 13, 2006 11:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
combo it all with some clandestine operations from our governnnet... dangerous mix.
If this all was out to all the public - what would we do about it?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: I3IVIIVI on Oct 14, 2006 6:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people I know who know Gary Webb say it was a suicide.
But the larger point is that it was a media assassination years before, not individuals going 'over the top' who are now vaguely apologetic for helping destroy a human being and better journalist than any of them have ever been, but a systemic response to truths that expose government and corporate evil (see the burying of the Cincinnati Enquirer's Chiquita banana exposé for another textbook case).
And off-hand slander against Cynthia McKinney adds to the feeling that this review is more about containing the damage to the establishment that Gary Webb's truths unleashed than it is in Webb's tradition of solid reporting exposing deep corruption.
Again, go here to see the series for yourself and keep looking around there for more on Gary Webb, and those who self-consciously try to continue on the path he was walking.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Does the "Off-Hand Slander" of Cynthia McKinney Seem As Contemptible To You As It Does To Me?
Posted by: Douglas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fiskhus on Oct 14, 2006 11:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Oct 15, 2006 1:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: insulaparadigm on Oct 17, 2006 12:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BurtonLT on Oct 19, 2006 3:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the 1960s the New Left promoted drug use as a way to expand one's mind and break free of the boundaries of society. Drugs and radical activism were intimately related.
So why has the left today suddenly "gotten religion" and joined in the anti-drug crusade? You'd think that the left would know better than to support the war on drugs, given the way that the war on drugs has torn up much of the Bill of Rights as well as being used as an excuse for the police to incarcerate the underclass.
So why does the left today do the PR work for the war on drugs by condemning the CIA for involvement in drug trafficking and spreading more fear of drug use?
Any thoughts on this?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sr on Nov 4, 2006 3:48 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sr on Nov 4, 2006 4:07 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sr on Jan 15, 2007 8:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sr on Jan 19, 2007 8:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Half-Naked Hot Chicks and Beer: The Sexist Guyland of the Super Bowl Beer Commercial
Can Obama and Dems Overcome the Right's Talk Radio Monopoly?
Why We're Addicted to Disaster Porn




