Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Racist Screed Is Flying Off the Shelves

By Alexander Zaitchik, SPLC Intelligence Report. Posted October 9, 2006.


Pat Buchanan's latest book is a white nationalist rant -- but that hasn't stopped it from climbing the best-seller charts.
patbig
Racist Screed Is Flying Off the Shelves
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Since the start of his latest book tour, Patrick Buchanan has appeared on just about every major television and cable network in the country, often more than once. He's been on NBC's "Today" show, the three most watched news programs on FOX, CNN's "Lou Dobbs Tonight," HBO's "Real Time with Bill Maher," and countless radio programs. During one four-day period in late August, the author was welcomed on no less than five NBC-affiliated programs. Together, these appearances have made Buchanan's new book, State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America, a runaway bestseller.

The three-time presidential candidate is no stranger to the major media, being personally acquainted with many of those who interviewed him. A veteran columnist with the Creators Syndicate and an analyst for MSNBC, Buchanan was a founding member of three prime-time network or cable channel talk shows and has written for many of the nation's major newspapers and magazines. That might explain the kid-gloves treatment he got from virtually all his interviewers, most of whom did not seem to have read or understood the book they were helping to publicize.

In fact, the book reflects racial views that have now veered to the extreme. White America is changing color, Buchanan argues -- "one of the greatest tragedies in human history." The Mexican government is involved in a plot to take over the Southwestern United States, and parts of this country already look like the "Third World." The segregated South wasn't all bad "culturally" -- blacks and whites were united, after all. America, despite what its founders wrote, was a nation formed not on the basis of creed but rather a homogenous ethnic culture. To put it plainly, State of Emergency is a white nationalist tract. The thesis is that America must retain a white majority to survive as a nation. It is rooted in a blood-and-soil nationalism more blood than soil. The echoes of Nazi ideology are clear and chilling. As Buchanan helpfully explained to John King, who was interviewing him in one of his several CNN appearances: "We gotta get into race and ethnic questions."

State of Emergency unapologetically reflects Buchanan's insistence on the centrality of race to the United States and its culture. "This idea of America as a creedal nation bound together not by 'blood or birth or soil' but by 'ideals' that must be taught and learned ... is demonstrably false," Buchanan writes in the book.

Simply put, America is not a nation of ideas. It is a nation of people -- white people. Buchanan is especially overt in making this case when he endorses the view of his late mentor and editor Sam Francis, that American and European civilizations could never have been created without the "genetic endowments" of whites. He goes on to describe discussions of race as "the Great Taboo"; to ignore the role of race, he adds, is "like not telling one's doctor of a recurring pain that could kill you."

None of this seems to bother Buchanan's cheerleaders.

"Congratulations on the response to your book," said Lou Dobbs, the CNN anchorman who has made a profession of attacking illegal immigration in story after story after story, as he introduced his old CNN colleague. Dobbs then offered up his own view that President Bush was carrying on an "outright war" against middle-class Americans by allowing illegal immigration. Wrapping up the interview, Dobbs concluded: "The book is State of Emergency. It's No. 3 on the best-selling list. ... I'm going to repeat it one more time. The book is State of Emergency. Pat Buchanan, always good to talk to you. ... [Y]ou've got a lot of readers, so keep it rolling."

Dobbs isn't the only one helping Buchanan keep his book rolling.

James Edwards, a former volunteer in Buchanan's 2000 presidential campaign and current host of the Memphis AM radio show "The Political Cesspool," did his part, too. But this show was no mainstream broadcast. It has featured an array of past and present Klansmen and neo-Nazis, a veritable "Who's Who" of the radical right. In an exultant E-mail sent out by the radio show after Buchanan was featured, long-time white supremacist Winston Smith celebrated.

"Don't ever let anyone tell you that this broadcast doesn't matter, my friends," he wrote, "because when the likes of Pat Buchanan agrees to be on your program, he does so only after his people have researched the program and decided it's in their interest."

State of Emergency is not the first book to reflect Buchanan's racialist philosophy. In 2002, Buchanan's The Death of the West warned white Christendom against a looming demographic tipping point. (The book's message so energized former Klan leader David Duke that Duke fantasized on his own radio show last year about winning the presidency with Buchanan as his running mate.) It was in that book -- edited by Francis, chief ideologue of the white supremacist Council of Conservative Citizens -- that Buchanan first began using the explicit language of white nationalism. In his footnotes to The Death of the West, the former Nixon speechwriter even cited the late William Pierce, author of the race-war novel The Turner Diaries (the blueprint for the Oklahoma City bombing) and the founder of America's then-leading neo-Nazi group, to back up his own arguments.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: patrick buchanan

Alexander Zaitchik is a journalist currently based in Moscow.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Here we go again!
Posted by: Temporary on Oct 9, 2006 12:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems it will soon be time for a historical deja vu

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here we go again! Posted by: willymack
dumb
Posted by: rsaxto on Oct 9, 2006 2:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Buchanan is too dumb and prejudiced to be able to realize that it would be a good thing for former Mexicans to control those parts of the USA that were stolen from Mexico by the USA empire. One thing is absolutely clear: they couldn't do a worse job at controlling USA territory than the Bushies have done. And Americans cannot do anything better for America than to impeach the Bushie criminals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dumb Posted by: South42
» RE: dumb Posted by: cinattra
» RE: dumb Posted by: moflard
» RE: dumb Posted by: Cthulhu
So Buchanan is a Racist...
Posted by: jimidee on Oct 9, 2006 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dee dee dee! Tell us something we don't know. However, putting that aside, is there ANY merit in what he is saying...I think so. Now before you uncoil and strike me in the juggler with your fangs, consider what Lou Dobbs said, the CNN anchorman "who has made a profession of attacking illegal immigration in story after story after story". I watch Dobbs often and he makes some of the same valid points. For instance, Dobbs view is that President Bush is carrying on an "outright war" against middle-class Americans in part by allowing illegal immigration. He is right. He continues that illegal immigration should be stopped for many good reasons...and not one has to do with white supremacy.

So let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater just because some old "Nazi" is bantering about some of these ideas in his new book. You don't have to disagree with all of Buchanan's thoughts just because you vehemently disapprove of some.

jimidan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So Buchanan is a Racist... Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: So Buchanan is a Racist... Posted by: cinattra
» RE: So Buchanan is a Racist... Posted by: astockton
Pat is CorpGovMedia's "pet" White Populist. He diverts white populism to culture, not economics
Posted by: mah_favorite_flavor_cherry_red on Oct 9, 2006 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there is a reason why the Elite Media is so eager to promote Buchanan. Many of the ideas he represents are ideas that are going to have to be expressed somehow in the political debate as staged by CorpGovMedia. If they were not, then many of the white TV watchers would give the media no credence whatsover, because those ideas that Pat promotes are ideas that are held by a huge portion of America. CorpGovMedia MUST represent a subset of those ideas or else lose credibility.

So they use Pat. And what they like about Pat is that he CHANNELS this huge reservoir of white populism AWAY from most of the economic populist ideas and towards cultural populism. The real hardcore economic populism deals with taxing the rich and giving that money to the rest of us. Pat does not talk favorably about this. Instead Pat talks about white people and how those feelings by white people and their race with respect to cultural ideas. And I suppose there is a place for some of that sort of thing. But this is ALL of what Pat is about. So Pat serves as a useful tool for the overclass. He is like a safety valve for political ideas that most threaten the overclass--white populism. Pat diverts white populism into areas that do not threaten the overclass. Pat is a Trojan Horse foisted on whites via the CorpGovMedia. He is their pet white populist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pat has the RIGHT STUFF
Posted by: shangrilalad on Oct 9, 2006 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
State of Emergency could make Pat Buchanan the next president. In case you haven’t noticed, a majority of Americans are racists. Plus, he’s a fascist, another big selling point. If he chooses to run for a fourth time, he could make it with a coalition of racists, fascists and fearful backing him up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pat has the RIGHT STUFF Posted by: debedb
» RE: Pat has the RIGHT STUFF Posted by: sterlingdave54
» RE: Pat has the RIGHT STUFF Posted by: cinattra
» RE: Pat has the RIGHT STUFF Posted by: JillHenry
What, pray, is "European"
Posted by: Julian on Oct 9, 2006 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Buchanan has written: "America faces an existential crisis. If we do not get control of our borders, by 2050 Americans of European descent will be a minority in the nation their ancestors created and built."
In addition to racism which throws out that which gives the USA its only truly unique claim to respect -- that it is a nation based on ideas, not on blood -- Buchanan seems to be calling Hispanic people's ancestry non-European. Isn't Spain European?
Like the Boer regime with its hair tests to distinguish "white" from "black" Africans, Buchanan is going where everyone ends up who promotes racial identity "politics" -- to the realms of the absurd. His pitch for European-ness is an inevitable product of the faith-based, anti-Enlightenment, revolt against reason. It is a revolt which needs to be met head-on at its ideological source.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What, pray, is "European" Posted by: outsidea
» What pray is American Posted by: edith
» RE: What pray is American Posted by: wolfdaughter
» RE: What pray is American Posted by: outsidea
» RE: What pray is American Posted by: Ulfhethner
» Oh, pig's bum Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: What pray is American Posted by: moflard
» RE: eason isn't always "reasonable" Posted by: SatanicJamboree
none of you get it
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa on Oct 9, 2006 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i ACTUALLY READ THAT BOOK. it is NOT "racist". it IS however pointing out that the "melting pot" approach to immigration is much much better at instilling AMERICAN ideals than multi-cultural approaches. if you REALLY feel cultural ghettoes with different laws are ok, move to the balkans. one america. one law. in the words of Teddy Roosevelt "there are no hyphenated Americans, only AMERICANS!!!!!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» cultural ghettoes Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: cultural ghettoes Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: cultural ghettoes Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» RE: none of you get it Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: none of you get it Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» RE: none of you get it Posted by: wolfdaughter
» RE: none of you get it Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
My skin is white, my ancestors are African
Posted by: seltzer on Oct 9, 2006 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the simplest arguments that destroys Pat Buchanan's work of mythology comes from a work of great complexity: the human genome. I recently learned about my own deep genetic roots by participating in National Geographic's Genographic Project, and the results were eye-opening. I was born in Ireland and have fair skin, straight brown hair, and blue eyes. However, according to my genes, my deepest traceable male ancestor walked out of Africa about 50,000 years ago. You can be damn sure he didn't look like Pat Buchanan. If we really look at ourselves, it turns out we aren't all that different. In fact, we're pretty similar, underneath the skin. Sadly, some of us can't accept this truth. Let's hope people reject Buchanan's racist ideas. It's time to realize we're all on this planet together, and we need to start cooperating if we're going to survive much longer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Intifada is the Arabic word for RISING UP
Posted by: wawa on Oct 9, 2006 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have proposed a THIRD Intifada in "KEEP HOPE ALIVE"

Physically NONVIOLENT but with words sharper than a two edged sword-

"KEEP HOPE ALIVE" is a work of Creative Spiritual Literature based on the memoirs of a 1948 Palestinian Muslim refugee from the Upper Galilee who made his way to America and into a career in the Defense industry with top-secret clearance during the Cold War.


I am returning for my fourth journey into Occupied Territory Oct 31, 2006 and will be a member of Sabeel's 6th International Conference and REALITY TOUR through the West Bank-

I will be reporting ALL on WAWA BLOG, and over the next few weeks the blog will be reflections on trips 2 and 3.

Trip 1 is covered in "KEEP HOPE ALIVE"
Chapter 11: 16 Days in Israel and Palestine


eileen fleming, activist, satirist, author, poet, reporter, editor WAWA blog

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lesser breeds
Posted by: Bbear41 on Oct 9, 2006 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Kipling said "Lesser breeds without the law," he ment the Germans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lesser breeds Posted by: Burton
» RE: Lesser breeds Posted by: ISlamIslam
What kind of guy reads Pat's book
Posted by: sausage on Oct 9, 2006 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What sort of man, or woman for that matter, reads, much less buys, a racist, xenophobic diatribe like Pat Buchanan's latest opus, State Of Emergency,The Third-World Invasion and Conquest of America?

He is the sort of man who votes for one of the U.S. House's favorite immigrant bashers: Iowa Fifth US Congressional District Representative Steve King.
"Our county has a very strong Christian influence," said Mark Lundberg, chairman of the Sioux County (Iowa) Republican Party. "King does very well because he's very conservative on many issues. And Steve says what is on his mind. He's not a waffler.

"King is pro-security, pro-marriage, pro-family, pro-English and anti-illegal immigration," said David Overholtzer. "He's our values."

Sunday Des Moines Register

In other words, a Republican. A Republican who never lets the fact that big agribusiness, the primary employer of illegal immigrants, is King's biggest campaign contributor burst his delusionary bubble.

He is the kind of guy who believes that Pat isn't interested in making a dime off this book despite the fact that the Buchanan family's turning racism into a lucrative cottege industry. It's certainly no coincidence that sister Angela "Bay" Buchanan is the "chairman" of the anti-Latino Team America PAC. And let's be frank, the Buchanans' pitch is simple, scapegoat Mexicans and Central Americans for middle-America's economic woes while letting their fat-cat stock-holding, investor buddies off the hook.

But P.T. Barnum was right, there is a sucker born ever minute. And the Republican rank-and-file is full of'em.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What kind of guy reads Pat's book Posted by: Iconoclast421
» ??? Posted by: sausage
» RE: What kind of guy reads Pat's book Posted by: SatanicJamboree
» Patronizing liberalistas Posted by: edith
There is no underestimating
Posted by: Ellie1 on Oct 9, 2006 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the general intelligence of the American public. At least 52% of the people in this country are so f'in stupid - I could say uninformed, but if you are uninformed you are too stupid to find the truth. I am ashamed to be an American.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

we do need to address race... in ways Pat wouldn't like
Posted by: thistleblower on Oct 9, 2006 7:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How ironic Robertson blathers on about how we need to address the race issue, when he and his white predecessors created this country's racial problems.If we had really given every person a fair shake when they came over... If we hadn't dabbled in enforced servitude of so-called inferior peoples... immigrants have overcome incredible obstacles to become upstanding members of society in the US. For every white man who struggled to get decent grades in an ivy league school in between orgies, there are ten minority business owners who struggle with a system designed to virtually ensure their failure, while their parents most likely risked death to even express their opinions to their neighbors within earshot of white men.

Being a white man myself, I am disgusted by what this man stands for and his immoral snake oil diatribes. I guess I shouldn't be surprised it's appearing right at this moment. This is how desperate Repubs usually fight for control of their sinking ship 'round election time: appeal to people's most base instincts, through fear and/or hate mongering. It it scary, though, what a mainstream treatment this screed is getting. Liberal media my ass.

And the thing is, Repubs always sink their ships. The whole Repub (you can replace Repub with Right Wing if you want to test this hypothesis before Nixon) menace can be summed up concisely: they use bugaboos to scare their way to power, gut the public trust and stuff the green in their fat wallets and yell and scream about "tax and spend" liberals all the way to their seven figure-and-beyond jobs in the private sector, until the next panic wave pops up. Usually when the house bank is flush with cash. gee, what a concidence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who Else Is Addressing NAFTA/Free Trade Scams?
Posted by: CatDad on Oct 9, 2006 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pat’s book is selling well because he’s addressing an issue that our corporate media/political system won’t. Pat, Ross Perot and America’s unions were voices in the wilderness in the early 90s, warning of the dire economic consequences of “free trade.” Of course anyone having this viewpoint back then was ridiculed in the mainstream media....and the whole nation, along with a Democratic president...went ahead and embraced NAFTA as the answer to everything from unemployment to ingrown toenails.

Fast forward thirteen years: Every dire prediction of what would come to pass if NAFTA was approved has occurred...even worse than anticipated. The main beneficiaries of NAFTA are the plutocratic, stockholding elites of North America.

NAFTA has been a catastrophe for America’s working poor, unions and especially poor, unskilled blacks. Almost all Repugs and Dems spew out the same CorporateSpeak propaganda: the “answer” is more education...We don’t need to stop this deluge of massive illegal immigration....We ALL need to go to college to prepare for the “jobs of the future.” In the interim: wages fall for the poor/middle class, corporate America gets millions of slave laborers who will work for peanuts and are too docile to bother with pesky issues such as safety/occupational heath and overtime pay.

In spite of all the evidence about how disastrous these “free trade” scams are for the working classes, the Dems behaved in their typical spinelesss way and AGAIN let another free trade bill, CAFTA, pass. As long as some “progressives” insist on viewing massive illegal immigration as some sort of right and the Dems/Repugs refuse to deal with the issue, people like Pat will gain credibility

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» This isn't Fox News Posted by: CatDad
» RE: This isn't Fox News Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Dean Baker for one. Posted by: sausage
Pat & Lou, two racist peas in a pod
Posted by: vangogh69 on Oct 9, 2006 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I long ago stopped watching Mr. Dobbs who, while admirably critical of Bush Co.'s moves nonetheless, happily endorses the myth of the "[white] middle class disappearing because of illegal immigrants [i.e. mexicans]". Dobbs adds fuel to an already hostile environment where non-mexican people are resentful, suspicious, and malicious towards non=whites. So of course, he invites Pat on his show to tout his book which, I'm quite sure will become a best-seller if marketed right. But to the facts...

The same arguments against immigrants from Mexico were in the not-so-distant past used against jews, slavic peoples (pejoratively called the "negros of europe" for some time), and the old standby, the African American. What these arguments, today, fail to recognize is that the thing destroying the middle class (if such a thing is even happening) is globalization, which drives down wages for everyone, polarizes societies, and decimates the living standards of all (in the long run) not of the upper classes. What Dobbs (and Pat) need to do is direct their ire towards the IMF and WTO, to start, however, seeing as how both Dobbs and Pat benefit from their policies (indirectly and directly), I doubt they'll critique them any time soon. So then, we get the non-white scapegoats instead of the real problem. Same shitty song, different lyrics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» know your facts Posted by: edith
» RE: know your facts Posted by: vangogh69
thoughtful
Posted by: ericksonml@sbcglobal.net on Oct 9, 2006 10:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real State of Emergency is the stealing of the elections in 2000 and 2004. Mark Crispin Miller's book on this: Fooled Again received NO book reviews and he was Never interviewed by any news show on mainstream television. Why is Buchanan getting such attention when something SO MUCH MORE IMPORTANT - the stealing of our democracy - gets a virtual blackout treatment. And Miller's book is not the only one.

Please get and distribute - copies of the DVD 'Stealing America - Vote by Vote' - by Dorothy Fadiman of Concentric Media!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Immigrants Watch Lou Dobbs too
Posted by: urbanaturalist on Oct 9, 2006 10:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember back in 2004, I was working at a hotel. And around 6 pm I would usually have my dinner break, and on the wall was a TV with CNN on and Lou Dobbs showing. The weirdest thing was that my colleagues would be sitting there at the this long table watching the TV, and over half of them were immigrants.....Salvdarorans, Filipinos, West Africans, etc. Everyone was eating and watching Lou Dobbs rant about the "destruction of the middle class" because of illegal immigrants. They just sat their cooly watching, some understanding, some not I presume. Just a comment.

Secondly, I wonder how Pat Buchanan feels about "white" Hispanics, or Latinos that phenotypically and probably genotypically have European background.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Buchanan is not against legal immigration
Posted by: edith on Oct 9, 2006 11:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Buchanan does not attack any legal immigrants of any origin. He calls for a slowdown only because the current laws which do allow generous immigration, family reunion, green cards and refugee status have been abused and stretched beyond reason. American culture is multinational, even if "anglo-saxon" legal and financial values heavily weigh in. There is nothing racist about a nation's effort to preserve its culture. When African Americans do it they are praised, and rightly so.

Latin culture should be part of our mix; it should not exist as a stand-alone culture in the US that does not assimilate. I don't think by the way that most Latinos I know have any desire to be apart from general American culuture, but some communities are overwhelmed by the rate of immmigaration and the linguistic and cultural changes. I know it's not that different from what happened in the US in the early 20th century. However at that time a growing industrial economy could provide jobs for immigrants and "natives" alike. Also millions were employed on farms that no longer exist. Unlimited immigration is no longer practical for an economy that is in a sea change. Until we understand where the jobs of the future are coming from, encourage investment in America, get rid of vile "free trade" agreements and make sure our existing African American and legal immigrant populations are given fair chances for employment, we should be cautious. That's what Buchanan urges: sensible caution. That's not racist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are wrong, Sir. Posted by: edith
» RE: You are wrong, Sir. Posted by: yellow
» RE: You are wrong too, sir. Posted by: cinattra
» RE: You are wrong, Sir. Posted by: edith
» RE: You are wrong, Sir. Posted by: yellow
» RE: You are wrong, Sir. Posted by: KC Frank
» RE: You are wrong, Sir. Posted by: yellow
stupid white men
Posted by: revolutionary80 on Oct 9, 2006 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pat Buchannon has missed the boat as always. White people are the very one's who have screwed this nation up ever since they stole the land from the Indians. I say we do away with the president and have a chief instead(who would be native american descent) as our way of saying we stole your land and screwed up... anyone who buys this book is just as dumb as the person who wrote it... by the way I am white...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: stupid white men Posted by: Shalimarali
» No Collective Guilt Trip Posted by: edith
» RE: No Collective Guilt Trip Posted by: moflard
Buchana is more right than wrong.
Posted by: JWest on Oct 9, 2006 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having read the story and the comments and having read the usual that the majority of Amercians are "stupid", "fascists", "racists", "clueless", etc. I'm astonished at the number here who do not understand the "the rule of law" or know the meaning of "illegal". Multiculturalism is not preferable to the melting pot. History proves it.

Unassimilated illegal immigration by the millions is the problem, not the citizen's rightful to determine their immigration policies. Damn few are against a humane guest worker program or immigration but they are against non-controlled illegal immigrations by the millions. There is a big difference. Hospitals are closing in the South and West, schools are overcrowded, taxes are rising and and crime by these illegal immigrants has risen.

They are driving down wages and US living standards, hurting the middle class and the proabale real motivation of continuing the perpetuation of Mexico's dynastic families to exploit and continue the neglect of the Mexican people. It is not the US's responsibility to provide for Mexico's poorest of the poor and provide a continual protective safety valve for Mexican special interests or our own.

You want open "North American Union open borders"...go ahead, then change the law.

Buchanan was dead right about the "Death of the West" and "State of Emergency".

Mr. Zaitchik's opinions alone via the SPLC and its pro open borders, anti-Southern, anti-conservative money making racket I suspect is the motivation of his name calling argument. God only knows what the staff of the SPLC would think of Washington, Jefferson and Madison.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Buchana is more right than wrong. Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Hey don't look at us! Posted by: moflard
I'm pretty confused about why the media sucks up to people like this idiot hatemonger.
Posted by: Lord Ichmael on Oct 9, 2006 12:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Third World's destroying America? How? Do they bite? They don't snatch our jobs; they're the ones who are willing to pick up on jobs that our working class refuses due to it being virtually slavery under Mr. de facto President Dick Cheney. And why are they more willing than we are? Because they're used to being treated like dirt. And whose fault might that be?

We've been around long enough that in the past we've survived at least one almost-extinction (about 10,000 years ago) because everyone at the time was more than willing to mix with everyone else. So nowadays we're basically all the same regarding the ethnicities of our ancestors, whether you like it or not. Buchanan might as well attack homeless people who are forced to scourge through garbage for food by claiming they're stealing everyone else's food.

The whole argument for racism, like homophobia and religious bigotry, has never made any sense to me whatsoever. (Any race) is better/worse than (any other race) because their skin pigments reflect different colors of visible light? Now how does that work? And given that the genetic differences in chimpanzees and humans is a mere 2%, I'm just guessing here, but I'd say the genetic differences between two (combinations of) ethnicities couldn't be any higher than 0.000001%, and that's not an exaggeration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can't be racist
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 9, 2006 2:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because 'hispanic' or 'mexican' or 'honduran' etc is NOT a race. In fact, its not even recognised as a race by the US gov't or the census bureau. Many 'hispanics' or 'latinos' will consider themselves 'white' or 'caucasian' and that is perfectly legitimate according to the gov't. No anthropolgy text, barring the ones sold by the Klan, will have 'latino' as a race. There are dark-complected 'hispanics', blond-blueeyed 'hispanics', and 'hispanics' who look more like American-Indian. Its not a race but an amalgamation of MANY different races (although admittedly the more militant organisations like LA RAZA claim that they are a 'race decended from the Aztecs'- who didn't live in California or Texas.) You could call Buchanan a 'classist', a 'anglophile', or something but this is not about race.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Can't be racist Posted by: yellow
» RE: Can't be racist Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Bushanan's Racism.
Posted by: yellow on Oct 9, 2006 4:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Buchanan is a career racist. He is the US answer to Enoch Powell in the UK whose racist rants inspire such enlightened working class institutions as the BNP. Both men are inspirations to racist thugs everywhere! They are hatemongers pure and simple.

I wish everyone concerned with this issue could read a great work on the issue co-authored by Mike Davis called No One is Illegal about racism and US immigration. Some of the more fascinating chapters prove that not only doesn't immigration, legal or illegal, create unemployment but actually creates jobs and economic growth through increased demand, productivity, savings, and tax revenues. Surveys were done of large US cities that received higher than national average rates of immigration and it turned out they also had higher than average job growth and wage growth. According to many business leaders and elected officials in these states cutting off immigration by means of force, a wall, or other means would be disasterous for these local and ultimately the national economy. They're correct!

We must come to grips with a new paradigm of understanding regarding immigration. US labor markets are not be altered by immigration. The structure of the US economy, its job market and wage tiers, are being established to accomidate a new work force which is lower wage and bereft of benefits. In other words, without massive immigration which is creating a two-tier labor market en masse, many sectors of the US economy would not exist domestically and would be shipped overseas.

The US and Mexican economies have always been intertwined to a greater or lesser degree. Mexican workers are the peasantry that US agribusiness never had and could never make of the US yeoman farmer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bushanan's Racism. Posted by: cinattra
» RE: Bushanan's Racism. Posted by: Doubtom
buddy
Posted by: collins101 on Oct 9, 2006 4:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with Pat Buchanan. America is being transformed and not for the better. Calif. has become a third world state and the rest of these United States are not far behind.
And what of the evironmental effect of continued population growth, with immigration a major contributor. Urban sprawl , loss of woodland and habitat, urban and traffic congestion, pollution. We need a moratorium on immigration now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: buddy...huh Posted by: Robba29
» RE: buddy Posted by: edith
» Your hooter is too small Posted by: edith
» RE: Your hooter is too small Posted by: moflard
» RE: buddy Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: buddy Posted by: collins101
» RE: buddy Posted by: yellow
» Yellow Joe Posted by: edith
Buchanan's a hypocrite and so are YOU! (okay, I mean we...)
Posted by: eyejam on Oct 9, 2006 9:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is illegal immigration? Call it labor insourcing. Those who decry illegal immigration know why it flourishes: because business wants--demands--cheap labor, eschews benefits, and doesn't want to accept any of the responsibility their exploitation entails. So why shouldn't companies, say like Walmart, have to contribute to the expense that their exploitation of illegal immigration puts on society. I certainly understand why unskilled immigrants come, what I don't understand is why we allow business to escape with it's hypocrisy intact.

With immigrants comes change. Buck it up, you wimpering shrews! Change to culture will come, whether from without or within, it is inevitable. What is particularly disturbing is how radicals like Buchanan are getting mainstreamed. Turn off the lights and go home people, the (hard right) conservatives have won (and with our help)...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» so why DO they come, them droves? Posted by: righteousbabe
consider the source
Posted by: edith on Oct 10, 2006 2:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zaitchick, the author of this ad hominem attack on Buchanan, is paid by the so called Southern Poverty Law Center, a notorious law firm that poses as a "nonprofit" civil rights public interest firm. It is infamous for its extraordinary expenses to spending on exempt causes ratio, and serves primarily as a vehicle for the fame and fortune of its founder, Morris Dees who has channelled millions of dollars of wellintentioned contributions to "civil rights" into his own pocket.

Fighting "racism" is a racket for people like Dees.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the flying fickle finger and the SPLC
Posted by: kiddingright? on Oct 10, 2006 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The SPLC "intelligence report" is an oxymoron. You can pick on Pat Buchanan for a lot of reasons but Buchanan's effort to point ot certain facts about migration from the Third World to the West.. isn't one of them. If it is "racist" to point out some truths than the term "racist" no longer means anything. The article slamming Buchanan and his book coming from an operative of the SPLC is like Hugo Chavez saying the clueless disconnected Dubya is "the devil." It means nothing to anyone who thinks and understands the ego and ideology on which both men operate.

If alternet progressives are honest they will look deeply into their own icons whether it is the SPLC or the ACLU. In 2000 the venerable publication The Atlantic did just that and what it discovered was the SPLC is like most other entrenched activist groups - it's about making the "other" look as bad as possible in order to keep bucks flowing into organization coffers. THAT is the main problem with most outfits on both sides of the ideological fence. As a reformed former Republican - it creates a great deal of cognitive dissonance to realize not everyone on "our side" is honest, above board OR principled or that they give a darn about limited government or the US Constitution, or the failure of "their" fair haired cretin to understand the limits of HIS power. Most of the time it is ALL about power and money and hanging onto one or the other. The article about Buchanan is a bad analysis of both his books. Since I don't trust the SPLC any more than I do the Cpac or the Carlyle Group, or the denizens of the Iron Triangle - I suggest reading the book and comparing it to data on hand. Data may be accessed doing a google search or delving into boring stats from various agencies in the US DoL, US State Dept. Census Bureau, the FBI crime stats, the individual states reports on impact of illegal migrants on services and infrastructure, the impact of illegal migrants on the environment along the border and in gridlock in urban areas, the impact of migrants on the lower end of the economic scale - a phenomenon discussed by men such as Harvard's George Borjas, or Wharton School of Economics, or even the more liberal EPIC, or the Society of Black Engineers who are livid over work visas for high tech workers from China and India. Don't dump the book simply because Buchanan wrote it - even a busted clock is correct twice a day. THINK!! Compare his data to what is out there in reputable non partisan outfits which includes Borjas and Wharton and Bear Stearns and even the GAO reports. But most of all don't decide until you put aside partisan or old bad habits about the "right" -- some of us on that end are trying to investigate OUR side and find it wanting. But bashing Buchanan because he has compiled information that is well documented without reading it yourself is intellectually dishonest and foolish - don't think partisan - think American and what has always been best about being American.

The SPLC which has crusaded for the rights of blacks for 23 years, is controlled by whites. It has hired only two black staff attorneys in its history, both of whom left unhappy. 12 of 13 former Black employees interviewed by the Montgomery Advertiser complained they experienced or observed racial problems during their employment. Several said the SPLC was "more like a plantation." [The Montgomery Advertiser. Feb. 13-14, 1994.]

Jewish Journal says American Institute of Philanthropy (AIP), a Maryland nonprofit charity, which publishes the Charity Rating Guide and Watchdog Report four times a year, gave SPLC an "F" rating (abject failure) because of the high expenses and low expenditure on charitable works.

There is more - just look for it. Do not believe everything the SPLC 'investigates' or condemns has anything to do with truth or justice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's all Bush's Fault (yea, right)
Posted by: Jerome on Oct 10, 2006 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Folks, it is getting to the point when I hear someone has a bad hair day that I expect them to say it’s Bush’s fault. Immigration is the fault of 40 years of bad policy and now someone (the House) is trying to clean up the mess. Look at the impact of these hard working folks, M-13, a school system totally bogged down and going broke, hospitals closing and depressed wages (and I have personal experience with that end of the equation) and a net drain of 2500.00 per person in services. Bottom line, it’s the law, enforce it or change it but don’t support a defiance of it. As far as a Third World country, quite a few places already are, El Paso is one and you never hear of this in the national media. At least a killing a day, normally more, the place is a cesspool. I don’t care who comes into the country, just do it right and make it legal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sure it's racist
Posted by: opeluboy on Oct 10, 2006 3:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure it's racist. But had Buchanan penned such a screed about Arabs or Muslims, and the need to destroy "Islamofascism," there would be no uproar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Guns, Germs, and Steel
Posted by: deejayvee on Oct 10, 2006 5:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read this:

"American and European civilizations could never have been created without the "genetic endowments" of whites."

and I feel I must make a mention of Jared M. Diamond's excellent book "Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies". In the book, Diamond gives a logical and well-researched reasoning of how "whites" came to dominate the globe - why did Europeans conquer the Americas, rather than the native Americans conquer Europe? It has nothing to do with racial superiority and is all to do with geography. A fascinating read.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Guns, Germs, and Steel Posted by: yellow
» RE: Guns, Germs, and Steel Posted by: deejayvee
Sunny Beasty
Posted by: sunnybeasty on Oct 10, 2006 7:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Buchanan is strange right winger. When I read his thoughts on globalization, outsourcing, corporate downsizing, the war in Iraq or US support for Israel, I find myself nodding in agreement. Actually, if I didn't read the name of the author, one would be fooled into thinking a leftwinger had penned his columns dealing with those subjects.

OTOH, his comments on religion, gays and immigration are some of the more sexist, racist and homophobic bigotry one can read in the MSM. As I said, strange. I think this man is ideologically confused.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sunny Beasty Posted by: Doubtom
KC Frank
Posted by: KC Frank on Oct 10, 2006 10:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zaitchik repeats the neocon canard that Buchanan is a racist. This is utterly false.

At this moment an nearly invisible struggle is underway for control of the Republican Party. On one side stand George Bush and the neocon clique that has operated party machinery since the Great Betrayal of 1995. That was the year that Newt and the Gang gained control of the Congress and walked away from the Contract with America. These folks are no more conservative than their Trotskyite forbears, as is evidenced by their willingness to grow government, to spend like Democrats, and to wield power in ways that would have had the Founding Fathers take up arms.

On the other side are the so-called "paleocons," (authentic conservatives) whose most effective spokesman has been and remains Pat Buchanan. The neocon campaign to neutralize the paleocons and remove them as an obstacle to power began with an evil and noxious campaign of character assassination and deliberate lies. Good men like Buchanan and Joe Sobran were vilified as "anti-Semites" and "racists" for daring to suggest that perhaps America's Middle East foreign policy should serve American interests rather than Israel's.

How ironic that Zaitchik is carrying the neocons' water by acting out such a pallid Joe McArthy immitation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: KC Frank Posted by: yellow
» The yellow peril Posted by: edith
» RE: The yellow peril Posted by: yellow
» Hello Yellow Joe McCarthy Posted by: edith
jacksonpaul
Posted by: pnsuitec on Oct 11, 2006 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of blaming the "lesser breeds without the law" for the third world invasion of America, Pat Buchanan should focus on the true causes of the "existential crisis" white folks now find themselves in.

Was this insidious threat to continued Anglo dominance in America really created, as Mr. Buchanan would argue, by an organized horde of cunning Mexicans plotting to make people of European descent "a minority in the nation their ancestors created and built"? Or could it be that he is on a mission to distract the American public from the truth about who actually is responsible for the invasion.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out why undocumented immigrants continue to flood into America. The choice for most of them is simple: go north to find work and a better life in Los Estados Unidos, or stay at home and starve.

And just as it doesn't require an exceptionally high IQ to understand why they come, there's also no rocket science involved in creating an effective means of substantially reducing the number of desperate, undocumented workers lined up at our borders, willing to do almost anything to get into this country.

For example, how serious would the problem of illegal immigration be today if our government, ten or twenty years ago, had developed enough backbone to pass and enforce laws that equate the hiring of undocumented workers with treason? Or, what if congress back then had called together all the corporate slavemasters of America and told them, in no uncertain terms, that, hey, if we catch you hiring an illegal alien, we're going to treat you like a black ex-con who gets caught red-handed stealing a television from the White House?

If this simple step had been taken before 12 million "third world invaders" slipped across our borders, would America be caught up in the immigration nightmare we find ourselves in today? Hardly. Because the lure of jobs, the strongest incentive for these unfortunate souls to enter the country, would have been eliminated.

But, of course, that didn't happen. And it's not likely to happen any time soon. Because the greedy, shortsighted white individuals that run the white corporations that reap huge benefits from the sweat and toil of an endless supply of voluntary slaves are the same white people that control our "elected" officials.

And with crafty representatives like Pat Buchanan diverting attention from the real causes of the "attack on the American middle class" with race-baiting, passion-inflaming rumors of a Mexican conspiracy to take over the southwestern states, and census projections of white America being overrun by an invasion of "mud people" in the near future, it looks like business will go on as usual.

And I do mean "as usual." Like the fence being proposed along the Mexican border. White corporations and sub-contractors will design it and supply the necessary materials, Mexicans will perform the actual labor, and the American tax payer will pick up the tab.

If white people are truly interested in addressing the real causes of illegal immigration in this countrty, they should start with a long hard look in a de-fogged mirror. And they should ask a simple question: "Would it be better to build a 700 mile barrier between the United States and Mexico to stop the invasion, or pass a 6-word law that says "HIRE UNDOCUMENTED WORKERS, GO TO JAIL"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Why Are You Blaming Pat? Posted by: edith
» RE: Why Are You Blaming Pat? Posted by: moflard
Unwise to discount this phenomenon
Posted by: talkville on Oct 11, 2006 4:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It bears thinking deeply about this 'best-selling' culture warrior's "opus" currently selling at top speeds throughout the USA. There's a definite swirling current of dis-affected people - many people- being expressed here. The nativist, nationalist and racial-cultural rationalizations being promulgated here have struck a strong populist chord with more than we'd like to admit. Such thinking was well represented in late 19th, early 20th century 'intellectual circles' and not only in Europe. We've begun in earnest to grapple with those same currents today here in the USA.

We ought not dismiss this as simply the ramblings of an anachronistic cultural and racial supremacist. It needs to be vigorously confronted from every angle possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bmobley
Posted by: mzbuz on Oct 12, 2006 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't believe Pat Buchanan is a racist, I think that term is over used and over hyped. Only a fool would think that any country in the world can maintain even a minimum level of security if it's borders are not secure. And only a fool would think that you can allow an unlimited number of people, who will work for next to nothing, into their country and not have a negative effect on their working class citizens. So he and Mr. Dobbs are both right on both scores. But, to address the thread of racism. I recently had a revealing moment during a conversation with my son. I said I thought the Israelies were wrong to over-react to the Hezbollah kidnapping of 3 Israeli soldiers, that the saturation bombing was counterproductive and I was accused of being an anti-semite! By my own son, who I would have thought, knows me pretty well. The level of hostility on this thread is also pretty counterproductive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

not about racism
Posted by: lclark on Oct 13, 2006 4:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In England there is a large influx of Poles, just as there is a large influx of Mexicans to the U.S.....In both cases it is to lower the wages of working people, and in both cases it is a citizentry being hookwinked by multinational corporations that view citizenship and national governance as a human resource department working for their advantage.

It not about racism and to continully spin the globalist economic agenda as a rascist issue makes me question the intelligence or motives of so called 'progressive' groups.

The nation states purpose is to protect the inherent rights of its citizens and provide for the common wellwealth of its citizens, not promote 'democracy' around the planet while its passes ever more restrictive legislation on its own citizens and allow the nations sovreignty to dissolve via open borders and multinational trade agreements.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]