Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Overthrow, Over and Over

By Laura S. Washington, In These Times. Posted June 27, 2006.


An unnerving new book takes a close look at America's long, dark history of imperialism.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The old saw goes, "the trend is your friend." Let's try that one again.

Stephen Kinzer's new book, Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq (Times Books) puts the kibosh on that notion. Kinzer, a former New York Times foreign correspondent, deconstructs America's disturbingly counterproductive foreign policy through competing critiques of the country's imperialism and its incompetence. His chronicle of America's role in interventions into 14 sovereign nations posits failure and avarice as our lasting progeny. It is a history lesson we can't afford to forget. 

Surfers, slackers, grass skirts and sunsets -- that's what Hawaii is all about, right? Think again. Think regime change. The 1893 overthrow of Hawaii's monarch, Queen Liluokalani, launched 110 years of American-led regime changes around the globe. Hawaii's monarch was overthrown by a group of haole (the Hawaiian term for white Americans). These wealthy sugar planters teamed up with John L. Stevens, the American ambassador to Hawaii. 

The "convenient" presence of the American gunboat Boston and 200 marines in Honolulu Harbor allowed the haole to lay Queen Liluokalani low. Minister Stevens, in classic American diplomatese, offered a "request" to Boston Captain Gilbert Wiltse: "In view of the existing critical circumstances in Honolulu, indicating an inadequate legal force, I request you to land marines and sailors from the ship under your command for the protection of the United States legation and the United States Consulate and to secure the safety of American life and property."

Hawaii was the first domino to fall. There have been 13 more, and we're still counting: Cuba, Nicaragua, Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Guatemala, Honduras, Vietnam, Chile, Iran, Grenada, Panama, Afghanistan and Iraq. The circumstances are familiar, the parallels eerie.

Kinzer writes that both George W. Bush, who invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, and President William McKinley, who intervened in the Philippines, "were motivated by a deep belief that the Unites States has a sacred mission to spread its form of government to faraway countries. Neither doubted that the people who lived in these countries would welcome America as liberators."  Talk to Rummy about it.

In a recent interview, Kinzer noted that Bush's predilection for a "faith-based" approach has nothing to do with The Lord. Instead, Bush relies on a myopic "faith-based foreign policy based on what 'we' believe to be true, not what the facts argue."

His book also mentions that "four CIA station chiefs in Tehran, Guatemala City, Saigon and Santiago explicitly warned against staging coups" in their respective nations.  

What's the point of spending billions for intelligence if the top dogs in the administration doggedly ignore it, or worse, send it back for rewrite? The CIA is surely misnamed: It's really the Compromised Intelligence Agency. The level of incompetence and venality is mind-boggling. Coups, insurrections, revolts and assassinations -- our government has done it all. This trend is indeed not our friend. In fact, as Kinzer notes, America's century of regime change demonstrates that the United States is singularly unsuited to ruling foreign lands.

Americans lack a fundamental understanding of the string of failures that our country has used to feather our own nest. It's what Studs Terkel, America's historian, calls our "National Alzheimer's Disease." We have no memory of history or its abiding lessons. What can we learn? What policy can we expect when contestants on American Idol capture more votes than any American presidential candidate in history? We have wrestled with this conundrum for more than a century. We have repeatedly been pinned to the mat.

Our dubious and flawed foreign policy is evident to everyone in the world but us. It's a FUBU foreign policy: For Us, By Us. Americans are anesthetized by rampant consumerism and ideological nonsense jacked up with a healthy dollop of jingoism.

As a result, the checks and balances provided by an educated electorate have all but disappeared from American governance. The fact that public opinion cannot counter America's affection for regime change is a fatal flaw. After Vietnam, our shell-shocked policymakers and military apparatchiks keenly felt the sting of the grassroots protests movements. The protests mitigated the government's aggression. No one wanted "another Vietnam." The cost was too high. But shelving the draft, moving toward Rumsfeld's smaller, deadlier military and fighting a global terrorist threat have ushered in a scary new world.

Here's hoping Kinzer's book can reach an ahistorical America and alert us to the perils of our interventionist ways.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Laura S. Washington, an In These Times senior editor, teaches journalism at DePaul University and is a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
even longer
Posted by: rsaxto on Jun 27, 2006 4:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The history of American imperialism is even longer than many published lists. We are caught in a groove of despicable bombings, subversions and invasions. We are more nation destroyers than nation builders. We need to get out of Iraq now and, in time, out of all the places where our troops and weapons are deployed. Most of the peoples of the world think we are ugly and will continue to think so until we withdraw all of our bases from all of the other countries. That is how to make freedom real for all of the world's peoples.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brothers in Arms
Posted by: peterklok on Jun 27, 2006 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is since WWII the problem of perception, both the selfperception of many Americans, and the perceptions of the Blair contingent of Europeans, given by the heroic help we Europeans received from America in freeing us of the tyranies of Fascism and Nazism. These two scourges made for a very just war on the part of America. I should perhaps include the freeing of Japan, although the parallel is not quite there, because of Pearl Harbor. Well, because America did indeed restore freedom and democracy, it becomes easy to see the various interferences in other nations this book is about in the same light. WWII is still within living memory, and this factor makes it more difficult to point out the faults, often of greed and profiteering, that underlie them.
We are still grateful for the sacrifices of The Band of Brothers, and we still have a love of American music and litterature, but America is stretching it a bit thin just now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Brothers in Arms Posted by: User280
Dawn L
Posted by: Dawn L on Jun 27, 2006 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's even worse than you think because the U.S. is not only responsible for armed takeovers such as those you have mentioned, but also for subverting the governments of 'friendly' countries like Australia, my home country.

During the Vietnam era, protesters against the war adapted the words of a Beach Boys hit, changing it to 'Servin' USA' because of the anger that the people felt about our country being used as a puppet for Uncle Sam. This is not only a problem with respect to the wars that Australians have been dragged into ... and died in ... when the U.S. government has decided to pick a fight with some other country. There are a lot of decisions made with respect to the way our country is governed that are not decided in our own houses of parliament but in Washington.

As just one example, there is a place in Australia called Pine Gap which is a highly secret U.S. military installation... reputedly a satellite tracking station but far too secret and far too ferociously guarded to be any such thing. It is believed by most Australians to in fact be a nuclear base ... and if an Australian aircraft should happen to overfly this area, it can be shot down by the American troops who man the installation ... Australians, in other words, can be killed by a foreign power for wandering into a part of THEIR OWN airspace. The Australian people were given no choice about whether they wished to have an installation on their soil which increases their vulnerability as a military target for any power opposed to the U.S.

Thinking Australians know very well that our country is ruled by Washington and not governed from Canberra ... as supposedly free people living in a supposedly sovereign nation, we resent being used, abused and dragged into wars that have nothing to do with us, at the whim of a government that couldn't give a damn about the welfare of our people.

This is why travelling Americans are often stunned to discover the levels of anti-American feeling that thrive in countries like Australia, which are supposedly friendly to the USA.

I am married to an American and now living in the USA and although I deeply love this stunningly beautiful country and her wonderful people, it breaks my heart to see how the government, big business and the mainstream media have collaborated to brainwash the people and keep them living in fear and ignorance.

A friend of mine from Australia who is a highly skilled practitioner and teacher of NeuroLinguistic Programming (which uses techniques for quickly and effectively changing thoughts, behaviors and beliefs that limit you, for therapeutic purposes ... but could easily be subverted for the purposes of mind control in the hands of those whose interests are not concerned with your wellbeing) ... recently visited this country and told me how horrified she was after watching the mainstream media 'news' broadcasts, which she described as "nothing more than entertainment" and went on to comment that "absolutely NO news (the real stuff, not the Hollywood-style-Washington hype) was to be found on US TV for the 10 days we were there. What was reported was only stuff that conditioned the psyche to civil obedience (VERY DANGEROUS) through emotional education."

I love this country and her people (well, most of them anyway) ... but I despise her government and the coalition of greed that keeps her people enslaved to evil while at the same time keeping them convinced that they are living up to the ideals put forward by the Founding Fathers.

Kudos to Alternet and other indie news sources for fighting the good fight, and to all who support them. Keep it up ... the world, and your country, need you more than they know!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dawn L Posted by: indy675
» RE: Dawn L Posted by: douglashoyt
» RE: Dawn L Posted by: FauxPorteno
» RE: Dawn L Posted by: Jamboree
» RE: Dawn L Posted by: TagsNOLA
America, the Liberators.
Posted by: symcokid on Jun 27, 2006 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It started with Liberating the Native Indians of everything that was rightfully theirs and it won't end with Liberating the Iraqi people of ther oil either. Imperialism is all about dominance, greed and control of everything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rogue Nation
Posted by: cmcanulty on Jun 27, 2006 5:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just read Rogue Nation along similar lines. It covers all of Us interventions in chronological order. Very good book, but also terribly depressing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some more excellent books on this topic are
Posted by: daw13 on Jun 27, 2006 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chalmers Johnson Blowback
Noam Chomsky Hegemony or Surivial
Walter Le Feber Inevitable Revolutions

Also the video on Chomsky by a Canadian group titled Manufacturing Consent (same as his book)

All of these describe the US's systematic policy of undermining real movements toward democracy in what it views as "client" or "service" states. Instead we install thugs who operate in totalitarian fashion to provide us with cheap labor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rubbish... US foriegn policy is not ignorance
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jun 27, 2006 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... it's pure imperial greed. The US doesn't make "mistakes" in foriegn policy. George W. Bush doesn't make decisions based on his "faith". It's a scam, it's about money, it's about controling oil, resources, and proping up a corporate junta in banana republics.

War is a Racket
Smedley Darlington Butler
Major General - United States Marine Corps


Ignorant rubbish like this book only encourages nationalistic self delusions that somehow, the state is working for our best interests... it isn't, it works for the money men. Period. The corporations could care less who dies. Ask anyone in Central America who dares to form a union in a Coca-Cola plant. Ask the poverty slaves making iPods. Ask Mexico. Ask Iraq.

Americans are so full of thier own bullshit even the critics can't see over the top.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imperialism is, as always, a cry for help!
Posted by: ncg96773 on Jun 27, 2006 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like all forms of rape, it is based on a deep seated, longstanding sense of profound internal powerlessness and the resulting repressed rage, externalized. Didn't think this Nation would qualify? Think again. Nobody gets born a dictator or imperialist. Slow, steady continuous acts of deprivation and cruelty will raise abusive leaders and those who tolerate/embrace them. Only an internally devistated human/ humanity can overthrow, destroy annihilate and force to submit, what they chose to perceive as 'inferior'. It is this process of externalizing and projecting our deepest feelings of inferiority and inadequacy, that keeps us sitting on the sidelines, while our 'elected' leaders perform imperial autrocities in all our names. Now to the cure of this ugly demise: Know what abuse is. Do anything you can to be in touch with your humanity, your compassion (for yourself and those around you). Know who raised you and how this was done. Be honest. Be honest. Be honest.
The foundation for Imperialism is always 'the Lie'. Profound, unadulterated honesty is the cure. Though this might sound trivial, perhaps even naive, imperial greed is the result of our unchecked, accumilitive sense of deprivation and inferiority. As I watch the song and dance routine of our 'elected' politicians, I see a group of priviledged individuals responding to their narcicistic injuries by accumilating power. It is the basis for their unanimously, infintile responses while faced with one of the more blatantly abusive administrations. If you were raised to hush when 'daddy' uses the 'voice', you are doomed to remain on the sidelines, watching your life, your birth right to humane treatment and dignity, evaporate. Looking around me, I anticipate nothing less than 0% humidity in the very near future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Teaching History . .
Posted by: FauxPorteno on Jun 27, 2006 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I double-majored in History and Anthropology while in school. I always dreamed of teaching anthropology, and particularly history, along more objective lines but alas that dream has long since come to an end. I know Anthropology will never, ever be permitted in our practically non-secular schools today. I was given a brief taste of Darwin in my biology class in high school, but that was quickly glossed over and the question of creationism vs. evolution never arose again . . .

I am confronted with a similar problem today, only this time it concerns the subject of history. It is increasingly apparent that I will never, ever be able to teach history without the obvious bias for the INHERENT GREATNESS OF THE USA. I look at text books used in today's high schools, and granted they have made some small gains, but the objectivity is clearly missing and children are still lead astray where subjects like our involvement in Vietnam and our virtual overlordship of much of Latin America are concerned. Yes it was clearly all about the Communism - laughable. $$$$ is never mentioned as a motivation for imperialism and only the "noble" intentions are stressed.

Get ready for the next generation of brainwashed kids . . . BTW, universities aren't doing much better!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Teaching History . . Posted by: douglashoyt
» RE: Teaching History . . Posted by: Ghoulman
» RE: Teaching History . . Posted by: Phenix
» RE: Teaching History . . Posted by: Robba29
» RE: Teaching History . . Posted by: FauxPorteno
» RE: Teaching History . . Posted by: Robba29
» RE: Teaching History . . Posted by: fairleft
» RE: Teaching History . . Posted by: FauxPorteno
Laura is a Hypocrite
Posted by: Gravitas on Jun 27, 2006 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is very hard for me to take anything Laura Washington says seriously. One one hand, here she is talking about people do not learn from the mistakes of the past, on the other hand she herself is relentless about repeating past mistakes in another area. I know this is not the topic, but Ms. Washington is the self proclaimed "fat nag" who believes humiliating fat people is a way to enact change. She had the nerve to go after Aretha Franklin at Luther's funeral. To me not to allow a person to grieve without making a public example of them is absolutely inhuman. (And hardly motivation at all for positive change, we have had nagging and stigma for 100 years, it is counterproductive!!!!!) If a person can be this insensitive and myopic to the human condition, it is hard for me to go past that and see anything she does as credible. It would be like trying to read an article on global warming by David Duke. I could never get past the rest of his inhumanity. I am sure Ms. Washington would be outraged by that comparision. But it she were as insensitive as she is to any other group, no one would tolerate her. Granted she works for the Chicago Sun Times, which grows more tabloid like everyday. And I wouldn't be surprised if she was bucking for that award the pharmaceutical companies give for writing about obesity in a way that helps them sell pills. But Laura, before you talk about anyone else repeating the mistakes of history, please take the plank out of your own eye first!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The ashes of empires and the blood of nations
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 27, 2006 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But Hawaii is absolutely critical for the forward projection of US military power into the Asian sphere of influence. Remember that an aircraft carrier battle group is incredibly powerful, capable of dominating thousands of square miles on the open seas. Maintaining our standard of living requires active military and economic intervention in order to secure natural resources and cheap labor. The fluidity of investment capital in foreign countries is critically important to long term US interests as well. Blah, blah, blah.

Economic and military overthrow of countries is nothing new, and it's all about the economic and geostrategic power moves... but that's can't be sold to the US people, with their quaint notions of freedom and independence and democratic institutions.

Iraq is just the latest intevention; the US government wants to go on a permanent wartime footing in order to consolidate their power; they'd like to eliminate the basic notions of democracy in the US. To do that they have to continue the long-term assault on the media, attempting to allow media monopoly to become the norm - a state-government propaganda organ that trumpets the glory of imperial ambitions. Undercutting access to the Internet is what they want as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George W should listen to George Washington.
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 27, 2006 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From Washington's Farewell Address

"Observe good faith and justice toward all nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all...It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and at no distant period a great nation to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence.

...Nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations and passionate attachments for others should be excluded, and that in place of them just and amicable feelings toward all should be cultivated...Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur.

Hence frequent collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The nation prompted by ill will and resentment sometimes impels to war the government contrary to the best calculations of policy. The government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject. At other times it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility, instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of nations has been the victim.

So, likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils... It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill will, and a disposition to retaliate in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld; and it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country without odium, sometimes even with popularity, gilding with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.

As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils! Such an attachment of a small or weak toward a great and powerful nation dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter. Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government, but that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial, else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it... Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests.

The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

you're forgetting half of Mexico
Posted by: abarbarag on Jun 27, 2006 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just to note on the imperialism of the US...in the mid 1800's, Mexico was a newly independent nation...who lost half of its territory to a US invasion (Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, part of California...) nice beginnings for a neigbor!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

foreign policy design: by the people and for the people
Posted by: cram ivlac on Jun 27, 2006 10:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ulterior motive is temptation, especially in the hands
of a self serving government !
A realistic approach for this hungry world of man, empower the working people of each nation to conduct foreign policy, ex. "UN"
The working people of each nation elect a separate body of respected delegates "natives" to negotiate policy, trade and war for their country.

two resulting benefits:

#1 add balance to the power struggle of selfish governace
#2 minimize the occurance of war! Mom's and Dad's in all countries know what is lost in war

We remain a nation of free speech, unless it threatens the powers that be

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There goes
Posted by: Phenix on Jun 27, 2006 12:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I originally crossed this author when I read his work on Guatemala and I am excited to get my hands on his latest work. The only unfortunate thing is that I plan on going to graduate school to study US imperialism and its many failed sucesses in the 20th century. Hopefully I can add some insight to what is most likely a very broad perspective on US imperialism in the 20th century.

Yea yea I know he includes Hawaii.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You Missed Some.
Posted by: cispirit on Jun 27, 2006 1:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's not forget Wilson's invasion of Hati. Or that we "liberated" what became Panama from Columbia. Or the unfinished buisness in Korea. Our involvment in East Timor. Going back further, the annexation of the newly formed republics of Texas and California. The occupation of Mexico City in 1847, that led to ceding to the U.S. the provence of New Mexico (Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, parts of Wyoming and Colorado).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You Missed Some. Posted by: Robba29
Shrug
Posted by: davcrock on Jun 27, 2006 3:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All things considered, the history of American imperialism is much better than that of Europe's. The Belgian Congo, French in Vietnam, and England in India are just a drop in the bucket. I find it odd that everyone is happy to point out America. Frankly, almost every country has committed an atrocity in the past. We can continue to fight about the past, or we can try to build for the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shrug Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Shrug Posted by: Michelle
Crime and Punishment
Posted by: Steven Wanzell on Jun 29, 2006 12:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans have benefitted from these conquests historically, but that age has passed. Now, the bills lay squarely at our feet, for having supported the tyranny. But Americans' awakening still hasn't happened. Like most of the rest of the world, I no longer trust (most) Americans to do right by humanity. I'm ashamed of my (former) countrymen, my (former) country, and my (former) indifference.

Steven Wanzell
artist/activist/ex-American
www.wanzellarts.com.ar

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement