Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Real News Business

By Rory O'Connor, AlterNet. Posted June 22, 2006.


'Real' journalism is about letting presidents and captains of industry lie. Get with the program.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

While channel surfing the other day, I stumbled across two titans of the mainstream media -- Jim Lehrer and Ben Bradlee -- chatting on public television about such weighty topics as "free speech" and "the state of journalism today."

Of course Lehrer, whose antediluvian and now demi-eponymous program "The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer" celebrated its 30th anniversary last year, has long been on record as decrying the state of journalism today. More specifically, Lehrer has been a leader of the dinosaurs who specialize in self-preservation by attacking emergent information media such as the blogosphere and other digital-era innovations such as citizen journalism.

Witness Lehrer's acceptance speech at Harvard, upon receipt from the Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, of the 2006 Goldsmith Career Award for Excellence in Journalism, wherein he denounced "the blogger, the screamer, the comedian, the search engine, the whatever" while lauding instead those he perceives as being "in the real news business -- one of us straight reporters, one of us journalists," and claiming that "little if any original reporting is done by bloggers or anybody else except the established news organizations."

Given Lehrer's position as an "anchor" and Bradlee's status as an "icon," I thought it might prove interesting to examine one small interchange in their televised tte--tte. It greatly illuminates how "original reporting" is practiced by "established news organizations" such as the Washington Post and "The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer," PBS's only nightly news program.

The dialogue focused on lying. Although the conversation centered on corporate and governmental untruths, it said far more about mendacity in "the real news business."

Jim Lehrer: You said that lying has taken the joy out of Washington. What do you mean?
Ben Bradlee: Well, I mean, I think a lot of people lie, and I don't think that they pay any price for lying the way, it seems to me, that we did when we were young. Certainly, I did when I was a teenager. One of the interesting things about reading all the stories currently about bigshot businessmen who are going to jail, Enron types, one common denominator is that, they didn't tell the truth.
Jim Lehrer: And it's just accepted that they lied? I mean, it's just assumed that they lied.
Ben Bradlee: Well, it isn't by me--
Jim Lehrer: I know, but I mean …
Ben Bradlee: … but society doesn't seem to be as outraged by it as, as they should. And it's one of the great, the worst of the sins, it seems to me, because you, you, you deceive people, and you deceive people originally on purpose, and then if you don't correct it, you deceive them, you've deceived them by, by nonfeasance.
Jim Lehrer: You've said also that all presidents lie. Do you really mean that literally?
Ben Bradlee: Yeah, I think they do. I think they do. And they lie because they don't search out the truth. They get involved in incidents that do not have a clear answer and in the process of explaining those or trying to avoid those, they say things that aren't true. Now, we don't like to call those lies, maybe because it isn't quite bold enough. It isn't quite obvious enough.
Jim Lehrer: People ask people who interview people on television all the time why they don't ask them -- when they ask a question, they hear an answer back that they know is wrong, they don't lean over and say, liar. It's not what we do.
Ben Bradlee: You'd get a lot of listeners if you do.
Jim Lehrer: Yeah, yeah, right. A lot of people don't want journalism anymore
.

Let's quickly recap, shall we? Let's see by their own admission, "the worst of the sins" for real journalists like Lehrer and Bradlee is to "deceive people." And "if you don't correct it, you've deceived them by nonfeasance." Further, "all presidents lie," but "we don't like to call those lies."

Finally, "people who interview people on television all the time" (like, say, Jim Lehrer?) "when they ask a question, they hear an answer back that they know is wrong, they don't lean over and say, liar."

Of course not -- because that wouldn't be "real journalism," although, sadly, "a lot of people don't want journalism anymore."

Were that the case, (that Lehrer believes it says far more about him than his audience) would it be at all surprising, given what these experienced, credentialed and celebrated media executives have just revealed to us?

Silly me. Like millions of other viewers, I had long labored under the mistaken impression that "real" journalism involved something called "speaking truth to power." It's only now, after 30 years in the business, that I discover that when powerful people -- the president of the United States, for example -- blatantly lie, it's not professional to "lean over and say, 'liar.'"

After all, "it's not what we do."

We being "one of us straight reporters, one of us journalists."

Thank God I'm a blogger, a screamer, a comedian, a whatever. Because if agreeing NOT to call a lying president a liar is the price of admission to the club of real journalism, just count me out.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Filmmaker and journalist Rory O'Connor writes the Media Is A Plural blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Just the facts
Posted by: Slmncty on Jun 23, 2006 2:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two thumbs up for truth to power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A good excuse.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jun 23, 2006 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Washington Press Corps has come up with a comfortable excuse for not doing their jobs. That is if you don't go along you'll be cut off from your source. As Jon Stewart said a reporters job is to write down what he's told and publish it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shit sandwich
Posted by: dainin on Jun 24, 2006 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now you're track brother. But the situation is much worse than that. American journalism is not just an oxymoron, these weasels are essentially working for the Pentagon.

http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=20771

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We're All We've Got!
Posted by: Steven Wanzell on Jun 24, 2006 3:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This site and other alternative media are THE key to turning America around. Let's not forget that. Forging this into a real movement is both possible and necessary.

Steven Wanzell
artist/activist/ex-American
www.wanzellarts.com.ar

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Citizen journalist
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver on Jun 25, 2006 3:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personally, I'druther be a citizen journalist myself. The pay stinks, $00.00, but the job is important; I told my daughter one time when she asked me what I was doing while working on my web site: I'm protecting the future for you.

Bush lied and freedom died; plus 2,520 or so American servicemen, and 50,000 Iraqi innocents at last estimate, and there's no end in sight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, unfortunately.....
Posted by: Mewsician on Jun 27, 2006 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There IS a lot of real crap bubbling up around the Internet that is a far cry from real journalism. In much the same way as wannabes on American Idol - who don't know a thing about music or doing the work it takes to be a real musician - think they're on track to be bonafide music stars after doing little more than learning to be a trained circus act, too many people posting their opinions on the Internet DON'T know anything about what real journalism consists of. "New media" is a terrifically good and important thing, no question about it, but Lehrer is right, for instance, when he points out that far too few are doing the real work of properly sourcing and vetting information, separating fact from opinion, etc. (Opinions are like assholes....everybody's got one. But that does NOT make yours "news.") The result is a lot of Internet chaff with the wheat - but the great thing about "new media" is that it will ultimately stand or fall on its merits; the stuff that prevails will be the more legitimate blogs, online journals and other Web-based outlets that do the work and deserve to be counted alongside more established, traditional news outlets - which are not all bad. Yet. Certainly television news is a joke, and with companies like Tribune gutting what's out there in the major papers, it won't be long before even their status sinks to the level of rabid, toothless blogs that are nothing more than some jerk bloviating. But all this sorting out will take time, and as with most large-scale change, there is something good to be found on both sides. If television is forced to be more accountable because of the Internet and the Internet is forced into doing better journalism in order to be taken seriously, then everybody wins. God knows the witless American public can use better information sources - IF they'll bother tapping them. But that's another (sad) story.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement