Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Dan Rather's Raw Deal

By Greg Palast, AlterNet. Posted June 23, 2006.


CBS canned Rather for his reporting on Bush's questionable military service -- but the BBC had already told that story to millions.
062306_story1
062306_story1
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

They finally put Dan Rather out of his misery at CBS. CEO Leslie Moonves put on his best mourning face, offering upon Rather's departure, "He had a very distinguished career. I'm sorry he's leaving us." However sorry Moonves may be, he still sent Rather to the glue factory -- all for reporting the truth. But not all of it.

Rather's "unsubstantiated story of Bush's military service" (says USA Today) got him canned. Yet, all the poor man did was repeat a story the Brits put on BBC Television a year earlier -- that Poppy Bush put in the fix to get his son out of 'Nam and into the Texas Air Guard, spending his war years guarding Houston from Viet Cong attack.

But Dan never reported this: the documentation from inside the US Department of Justice detailing the fix. Why not? Because it opened up a far more serious charge: that those who kept Little George out of war's way ended up very well rewarded. The BBC, the world's biggest network, ran that full story -- from the evidence of the fix to the evidence of the lucrative pay-backs -- and the BBC never retracted a comma of it. Nor, by the way, has the White House denied our accusations despite our repeated offers to respond.

George's slithering out of combat turned into big pay-days for those in on the fix and its cover-up: Harriett Miers (remember her?), Karen Hughes and Texas lobbyists.

The necklace-ing of Dan Rather

You aren't stupid, they just talk to you that way. It's 2004. Falluja's on fire, your pension's burning away, the last General Motors worker is turning out the lights in Detroit -- and the biggest issue of the election, aside from Christians who don't want homosexuals to have families, was whether some elderly news celebrity, Dan Rather, had besmirched the reputation of our President, a former Naval Aviator. They can't get you to ignore that man behind the curtain, Dorothy, unless there's a fascinating show on stage to distract you. And, for the final days of the presidential campaign, they gave us the lynching of Dan Rather.

We know George Bush was a Naval Aviator because it says so right on his toy box. Actually, he never was a Naval Aviator and never once landed a plane on the deck of an aircraft carrier. During the Vietnam War, our future President flew in the Texas Air National Guard protecting Houston from Viet Cong attack. Our President obtained that job the same way he got the current one: The fix was in.

Congressman Poppy Bush, said Rather, put in the fix for his son, despite Junior's too-dumb-to-fly test scores, by putting in a call to the head of the Texas Air Guard via Texas Lt. Governor Ben Barnes. That's what Dan Rather reported on 60 Minutes, that Bush Jr. got the Texas top gun post, and thereby dodged the draft and the bullets of Vietnam. It was a hell of a scoop and his network rewarded him and his producer, Mary Mapes, by firing their sorry asses. That wasn't enough.

The president of CBS, Leslie Moonves, bullwhipped his network's stars and, with his own spit, polished the soiled war record of our President, declaring that Rather's producer "...ignored information that cast doubt on the story she had set out to report -- that President Bush had received special treatment thirty years ago, getting to the Guard ahead of many other applicants."

Really? Well, Mr. Moonves, look at this evidence: "His [George W. Bush's] dad called then-Lt. Gov. Barnes to ask for his help to get his son not just in the Guard, but to get one of the coveted pilot slots which were extremely hard to get. [Barnes, through a 'cut-out,' a third party,] contacted General Rose at the Guard and took care of it. George Bush was placed ahead of thousands of young men, some of whom died in Vietnam."

This is from a letter which had remained locked for years in the file cabinets of the U.S. Justice Department prosecutor in Austin, Texas. How I got it does not matter. Our War President has not challenged authenticity. And its contents, Mr. Moonves, were confirmed by the "cut-out" himself, the man who made the call to the Texas Air Guard for young George. (Would the cut-out, a major figure in the Lone Star State, allow BBC to film his statement? He said, "Do I look like the dumbest Texan on the prairie?") But you knew that, if you're not American. At the Guardian and on BBC we also reported, before the presidential election, that Lt. Governor Barnes had put in the fix for George Jr. at the Air Guard. The BBC reported that in 1999, before Bush's first run for office.

Justice for Miers

But there's much, much more to the story than Rather had cojones to report. Barnes had two tasks -- one, to get little George into the Air Guard and the other was to shut up about it. Keep it quiet. Barnes's good deeds and long silence were, indeed, well rewarded.

Barnes, who left office under a cloud of impropriety, stayed on in Austin as a big-fee lobbyist. And the biggest fee he received, maybe the biggest ever in the history of the lobbying art, was at least $23 million for representing a company called GTech when it got the contract to operate the Texas lottery. GTech's creepy ways of doing business caught up with it in 1997, when, after questionable payments to the Texas lottery director's boyfriend were exposed, GTech lost its contract by order of the new, uncorrupted, lottery director. The lottery work was put up for bid and GTech's replacement chosen.

But then something quite extraordinary happened: The new state lottery director was fired, the bids tossed out and GTech given back the lottery work -- no bidding required. The governor at the time: George W. Bush. Now, let's go back to the letter buried at the U.S. Attorney's Office in Austin: "Governor Bush through [another cut-out] made a deal with Ben Barnes not to re-bid because Barnes could confirm that Bush had lied during the '94 campaign. During that campaign [for Governor of Texas], Bush was asked if his father...had helped him get in the National Guard. Bush said no he had not, but the fact is his dad called then-Lt. Gov. Barnes. ..." Silence has a price and Barnes, the letter says, got his "safety for his client GTech, with whom he maintained hidden ties." I can't imagine that Barnes would make such a raw demand on Bush.

But the war hero Governor's team made damn sure that no harm came to Barnes and his business associates. The Governor talked to the chair of the lottery two days later and she then agreed to support letting GTech keep the contract without a bid. Did Governor Bush put in the fix for GTech as alleged?

I wasn't on the phone when he spoke to the lottery board Chairwoman. Maybe they talked about their newfound faith in the Lord, which they both discovered together at the same time. The Chairwoman? Harriet Miers. We don't know if Miers gave the overpriced GTech its contract back to help the governor keep his Air Guard secret a secret or simply because she liked GTech's record of high costs and corruption. In 2005, George W. Bush's attempted appointment of Miers to the United States Supreme Court surprised the U.S. media and even the President's own supporters. But I wasn't surprised at all.

Silence of the media lambs

In 2004, he knew exactly what would happen when he finally asked those questions. He had already delivered his own eulogy. On June 6, 2002 on the program I report for, BBC Newsnight, Rather said:

It's an obscene comparison but there was a time in South Africa when people would put flaming tyres around people's necks if they dissented. In some ways, the fear is that you will be neck-laced here, you will have a flaming tyre of lack of patriotism put around your neck. It's that fear that keeps journalists from asking the toughest of the tough questions and to continue to bore-in on the tough questions so often. Again, I'm humbled to say I do not except myself from this criticism.
The lynching of Dan Rather is a cautionary tale of how news is made in the USA -- and unmade -- and topics permissible during an election. The story that cannot be reported is not about George Bush's special treatment but about the special treatment of the specially privileged.

The real story, for me, is that Little George was just one of a dozen privileged princelings saved from the dangers of their powerful daddies' wars. Barnes did not give help to Bushes only. The man who actually made the call to the Air Guard for Little George at Barnes' request also confirmed that at Barnes' request, he also put in the fix for sons of Democratic big-wigs, Governor John Connally and Congressman, later Senator, Lloyd Bentsen.

Vietnam was one front in a class war, and only one class was sent to fight it. I don't blame Congressmen Bush Sr. or Bentsen for keeping their sons out of Vietnam. I do blame them for sending other men's sons in their place.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Greg Palast is the author of a new book, Armed Madhouse. Read his work at GregPalast.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Kill The Messenger
Posted by: ChristopherLL on Jun 23, 2006 3:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article. Too bad this country now relies on killing the messenger rather than listening to the messege. I wish the BBC story had received front page exposure years ago. But this is America after 9/11 and the truth is no longer a goal in politics or journalism. Our government, along with the complicity of journalism, has stiffled any open discussion of reality and in its place has generated a propoganda machine worthy of Naxi Germany. Fear of attack and scapegoating are the two main themes that Goebbel's used to transform Germany from the most civilized nation in the world to the fascist country it became. Needless to say any and all of those within that system who looked for or spoke the truth of Hitler's real purpose and motives were quickly eliminated. Hitler served in WWI but only as a "gopher" in the trenches who took and recived messages. He was not trusted with a gun by his superiors. He was a sexual deviate who forced a relationship with his niece (who subsequently committed suicide) and had a perverse relationship with Eva Braun (he enjoyed "golden showers"). So our "War President" not only avoided war but was unable to serve his stateside assignments. And his use of illegal drugs, considering his years of rampant alcohol abuse, is most likely factual but again has been buried as a news item. But basing leadership on fabrication and falsification can lead only to its failure. And so far nothing Bush has done in office so far can be considerd anything but failure. The media in time will most likely pay some price for their own failure to represent the rights of citizens to know the truth. My sense is that major news organizations like CBS are now mostly entertainment and the real news will come, as it idoes now, from various Internet websites and foreign sources.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fear of Attack Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Fear of Attack Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Fear of Attack Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Kill The Messenger Posted by: Doubtom
Beautiful Piece!
Posted by: PeaceLove on Jun 23, 2006 3:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow. This is more subtle writing than we regularly get from Mr. Palast. Raw, angry yet controlled. Beautiful.

Nice job, Greg!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Beautiful Piece! Posted by: YeahOKyourRight
» RE: Beautiful Piece! Posted by: Doubtom
crooks
Posted by: rsaxto on Jun 23, 2006 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the crap that happens when elections are stolen and the government at all levels is staffed with greedy crooks who lie about almost everything. Impeach the Bushies and all the other greedy crooks and elections stealers and have a real electoral system with real elections and real vote counting. If we do not fix our governments then we deserve the fascists that are taking over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More shame for Lt. Bush
Posted by: Democritus on Jun 23, 2006 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Greg Palast doesn't report the rest of the story: which is that Lt. George W. Bush did not honor his commitment to the Texas Air National Guard. After having had hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on his flight training, Lt. Bush failed to report for his flight physical after eighteen months and was removed from flying status. He skipped out of most of his commitment after that. You can get the full story in Hugh Scott's book, George Dub-ya Bush: The Phony Fighter Pilot. For the short version go to Scott's website, www.FreedomCentralUSA.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Death of CBS News
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jun 23, 2006 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm just old enough to remember November 22, 1963. In those days, whenever a major news story was unfolding - no questions asked - you automatically went to CBS News. Think of it's history: Edward R. Murrow, Walter Cronkite, Eric Severeid. Those sons-of-bitches had some serious gravitas, baby!

Those days are long gone. The refusal of the suits at Black Rock to stand by their man is final proof that CBS's glory days are well behind it. Then they announced that they were replacing the great Bob Scheiffer with someone with the impressive journalistic credibilty of Katie Couric. That was the final nail in the coffin as far as I'm concerned.

Dan Rather has been the whipping boy of the brain-dead right wing since the days of Dick Nixon.

Nixon: Are you running for something?
Rather: No, sir. Are you?

OK. Maybe that WAS a bit of a cheeky exchange on Rather's part. But you've got to admit that he was (and is) a reporter's reporter. Watching his impressive career in broadcast journalism end in such an ignominious way is too damned depressing to ontemplate. The fact that the neanderthals of Hate Radio are giddy with joy over his fall, only bonds me to him even further.

There was something about Dan Rather. The man's essential decency and, yes, patiotism always shown through his reporting. Maybe I've been deceiving myself all of these years but I don't think I am.

I'll continue to watch the CBS evening news until September when Uncle Bob takes his final bow. I'll probably even watch the first few nights of Katie's short run (That's REALLY going to be fun to watch!) I'll also continue to watch Face The Nation until they replace Schieffer with Britney Spears....

....But after that, I'm afraid I'll be tossing CBS News to the wind....Ah, memories!

Dan Rather took a stand and paid a heavy price just as Edward R. Murrow did fifty-two years ago. What the film, "Goodnight and Good Luck" failed to depict wat the fact that Murrow's famous March 1954 McCatrthy broadcast was the beginning of the end of his career at CBS. Have the execs at West 52nd Street even seen that film? Maybe they should.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
http://tomdegan.blogspet.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Death of CBS News Posted by: mysticalrae
» RE: The Death of CBS News Posted by: jgdewey
» RE: The Death of CBS News Posted by: vangogh69
Dan Rather's "Downfall"?
Posted by: ArchiesBoy on Jun 23, 2006 4:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At last I get to say it: Rather was a perfectly awful choice to replace Walter Cronkite. It should have been Bernard Shaw, something CBS never understood. As far as I'm concerned, Rather was a poor stand-in — ALL THESE YEARS — for the right someone who never came. And now CBS, in its desperation, has settled on perky Katie Couric, yet another shill, based on comments I've heard her make on the TODAY show over the years, for the Right Wing. CBS marches ever onward in its growing Foxification.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dan Rather's "Downfall"? Posted by: sirossisofliver
» RE: Dan Rather's "Downfall"? Posted by: sirossisofliver
» RE: Dan Rather's "Downfall"? Posted by: mikespindell
» RE: Dan Rather's "Downfall"? Posted by: Pinklillies
Great Info, Bad Writing...
Posted by: linguizic on Jun 23, 2006 5:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Palast has a nack for getting the goods, but when it comes to writing it in a way that mass audiences will want to read he fails miserably. His indignance makes him sound hateful, which is exactly what Rush Limbaugh tells us we are. This information is important, just like everything Palast writes, but it will never get out to mass audiences because of his writing style.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great Info, Bad Writing... Posted by: peacefulaim
» RE: Great Info, Bad Writing... Posted by: mdruss42
» RE: Great Info, Bad Writing... Posted by: Mike Turnauer, Vancouver,WA
» RE: Great Info, Bad Writing... Posted by: iconoclast6
» Why dumb it down? Posted by: loril
» RE: Why dumb it down? Posted by: sheena2u
why don't Americans create a new 'truthstream' newspaper?
Posted by: concerned Canadian on Jun 23, 2006 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Enough nostalgic reflection already about what has been lost or asking the question of where have all the heroes gone? It seems time to recognize that freedom of speech is under serious attack to the point of being pushed out from newstand sales or home deliveries. And now, let's not forget that freedom to communicate freely may also become a memory as the internet's freedom is under attack. Is there a lack of money out there to start a counter attack on these stepford news services? America must be filled with bright minds and young people who would go the distance in order to save their futures from attack. So is there a lack of money? or will? or passion? Just remember what toppled Nixon. What about tv ads starting immediately, 10 second spots focusing on the tough questions that Bush can't answer. It seems time to turn up the volume of truth and extinguish the lies. Americans need to invest in action, not just reminiscing about what used to be or thinking of what could be. The side of truth needs to coalesce and accept the fact that the war is on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Think Mysterious "Accidents" . . . Posted by: FauxPorteno
Don't Miss the Point
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jun 23, 2006 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The real story, for me, is --- he also put in the fix for sons of Democratic big-wigs, Governor John Connally and Congressman, later Senator, Lloyd Bentsen."

I'll bet you'd find that during the Viet Nam war the National Guard of every state became top heavy with priveleged kids of wealthy families. The key word is "wealthy". This problem isn't a Texas problem nor a Republican problem it's an economic class problem.

The wealthy corporate establishment class owns both political parties. The political fight isn't between the Republicans and Democrats; it's between the lower economic class and both the Republicans and Democrats.

While Bush and his cronies should be impeached and jailed, that wouldn't solve the problem. As long as the corporatocracy controls both parties it can't be put out of power by changing parties. The people must take control of the government.

There are only three ways this can be done. (1) Form an electable third party. Even the most optimistic among us should realize that this is a very long shot. (2) Effective reform of campaign finance and lobbying laws. Realists know that this is an equally long shot. The people in power don't want it. (3) A new and unique solution.

I propose a grassroots movement The Lincoln Initiative. It is an untried solution but it's based on the tried and proven successful tactics of the labor unions. Make demands of the people who have the power to grant them and give them an "or else".

This movement doesn't try to vote one party out and another in. It tries to take control of the leadership of both parties. It doesn't try to use the power of our votes in an election. In an election our votes only have the power to choose which party will serve the corporatocracy. It uses the power of our votes the only time they have power, before the election. Before the election we can make both parties compete for our votes.

Join The Lincoln Initiative. Make "government of the people, by the peoplle, and for the people" a reality. You have almost nothing to lose and a Republic to gain. Click on Join Today

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Rich and/or Powerful Posted by: chaoslegs
» RE: Don't Miss the Point Posted by: sidewinder
» RE: Don't Miss the Point Posted by: Lincoln fan
sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Jun 23, 2006 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Haven't you been looking? Bob Shieffer has bags under his eyes. Pretty counts no matter if they can't spell shit much less pronoounce it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't doubt Greg
Posted by: mrjones on Jun 23, 2006 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but why does the BBC publish this on their site? on June 20th:

"His retirement was marred by criticism of a report questioning President Bush's military service, based on evidence that turned out to be forged."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I don't doubt Greg Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: I don't doubt Greg Posted by: mrjones
» RE: I don't doubt Greg Posted by: famouspipeliner
» RE: I don't doubt Greg Posted by: sea4to
» RE: I don't doubt Greg Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: This...changed Bush? Posted by: sheena2u
» what was forged?? (bbc error?) Posted by: aurora2484
Re sirossiflivver
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Jun 23, 2006 7:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right on. The only thing more loathsome, sickening and stomach-turning than the First Smirker's smirker's smirk is that grimace of Sawyer's

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it never ceases to amaze me how the progressive blogs idolize the mass media
Posted by: sheeplepeeple on Jun 23, 2006 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The mass media, Dan Rather, PBS, CBS, NBC, etc have never been on the side of the working American. Why on earth does the democratic-progressive online community treat Rather, etc, as anything other than a major enemy of the working American citizens?

THe mass media is the main way that the dominant factions in America rule. The mass media is how the dominant faction transmits their ideas to us. Dan Rather has become super rich doing their dirty work. Instead of telling us about his "raw deal," you should be telling us about how we can put Rather and the rest of the super rich mass media lords behind bars forever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Got a point there . . . Posted by: FauxPorteno
And now Cronkite's chair passes to (gag!) Katie Couric??!!!
Posted by: fool-on-the-hill on Jun 23, 2006 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The triumph of form over substance---and of the big fix from "daddy", for that matter---reaches its zenith when the gnat-brained Couric usurps what was once the high throne of American television news!

Couric would never have made it to weekend anchor on a local station, if her daddy hadn't strong-armed media moguls into giving his "little girl" an unearned big break.

We got a preview of what we can expect from her "news coverage" in an interview she conducted right after the Iraq war was launched: "Oo-o-o, I think Navy Seals rock!" (At that point I quit watching any program that had her in it.)

It would be laughable, if it were not so sad (and sickening).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Via
Posted by: via on Jun 23, 2006 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least now Dan will be free of constraint, and maybe we will benefit in the long run. I agree with the commenter who suggested a progressive newspaper alternative, but I still believe that there must be a television option. Too many people only get their information from the tube, and there is a critical need for a channel that reports the truth. Maybe we should take Keith Olbermann as a model, and press for expanded format?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did CBS intentionally burn itself?
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Jun 23, 2006 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no direct evidence, but I strongly suspect that CBS burned itself and Rather so that Bush would win the election. They may have tarnished their name a little, but CBS, as a business, simply had too much to gain from another four years of Bush. And I bet they still haven't forgiven Rather for talking about controlled demolition when he reported on the collapse of building 7. So this was kind of like killing two birds with one stone. Hell, it was more like 3 birds. People can use this story to claim that the media has a liberal bias. heh

But to me the bigger story is the right wing noise machine. The way these idiots find some tiny little sliver of doubt and just pile on and march in lockstep like 10,000,000 lemmings off a cliff... they really worry me because that behavior is so dangerous.

Everyone on the right was all over that "forged document" story. Because it was suspicious. Too suspicious, imo, suspicious to the point of obviousness... which also worries me. How can something be suspicious when it is totally obvious? Like a trail of breadcrumbs... Yes, something about this story stunk badly. I find it impossible to believe that CBS didn't see it coming. In fact I know they did because I read and watched the interviews with CBS's authenticators who predicted the backlash from the right wing noise machine. So I guess I do have a small amount of direct evidence that CBS burned itself intentionally.

The whole forged document story comes down to one simple question: when you see a trail of breadcrumbs, do you ask "I wonder who left this?" or do you ask "was I supposed to find this?"? Were 1 million idiot wannabe detectives supposed to jump on this? I mean these people aren't too bright. Most of them still think Bush is a conservative. Ha ha. Yeah not too bright.

But what really bothers me is that these people scrutinized this story yet they just swallowed all the lies about 9/11. ("It's all just a series of weird coincidences. blah blah blah") I honestly thought the able danger story was going to be their undoing, because their desire to blame Clinton could have exposed more of the conspiracy. But that story just sort of died when they realized it went far beyond a Clinton or a Gorelick.

But anyway my point is... the million idiots who were all over this forged document story are a real problem because they so completely gullible. They didn't care about the story. For them it was a simple equation:

"Microsoft Word didn't exist back then so therefore Bush's [censored] doesn't stink. "

Talk about a classic non-sequitur. But I guess that's about how deep their tiny little groupthink consciousness goes. It doesn't take a genius to realize that such a ship of fools could easily be steered into a rock. hmm... "a rock" ... "uh-rock"... Iraq... imgaine that. Just another coincidence I'm sure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Did CBS intentionally burn itself? Posted by: famouspipeliner
More info available.
Posted by: Jasshrie on Jun 23, 2006 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A great book that goes into the details of Bush connections and secrets is

Fortunate Son: George W. Bush and the Making of an American President by James Hatfield

who, by the way, was found dead in a hotel room of an apparent drug overdose several months after his book received attention. I recommend the 3rd edition since it was released after his death and contains an interesting foreword.
Check a description out at Amazon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Public Broadcasting
Posted by: Arvy on Jun 23, 2006 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is there a Public Broadcasting Service over there in America? Sorry but this is a vague memory from watching "Wayne's World" all those years ago…
How does that work, then? I suppose it can't be that far reaching or powerful and I suppose you must get a lot of nutters using it, but seems like it's somewhere to start.
Can Alternet not organise some public meetings where all these commentators can get together and debate in public, invite others who've never heard of Alternet, etc rather than relying on this forum where there's a lot of (useful) talk but no action?
And all those comments I've read from American citizens who want to leave the country and seek refuge somewhere else… every country has its own problems, America needs YOU to change, don't abandon it!
Cheers!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Public Broadcasting Posted by: babs
The Triumph of Newspeak over Truth
Posted by: tanstaafl28 on Jun 23, 2006 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rather was bent over harshly for doing his job, his mistake was trusting that something like "the truth" would matter more to Americans than the desperate desire to believe something-anything that would make Bush shine.

The way they "debunked" that memo was a classic tale of fraud and ignorance, and people bought it, they lapped it up like dogs eating gravy. Microsoft Word "Courier" font is a perfect digital reproduction of all standard typewriter fonts, including the standard government-issue IBM Selectric that typed that memo in the first place. This is all the Neocons had to do to discredit the whole thing? People believe what they want to believe and they believe it even more if they're given no reason not to believe anything else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does anyone else remember this?
Posted by: Ratskii on Jun 23, 2006 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't remember which network it was on but there was an interview done with the secretary of GWB's commanding officer. She said, "I think this document is almost certainly forged; however I believe that whoever wrote it read what my boss (GWB's commanding officer) actually wrote, because it reflects his feelings about GWB."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Third Rail of News Reporting
Posted by: CatDad on Jun 23, 2006 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The term “third rail” refers to the third, outer electric rail on subway lines...touch it....and you die. “Social Security” has long been the “third rail” of American politicians....proven again by the “Ownership Society” debacle.

The issue of Dubya’s dubious National Guard record has become the third rail of news reporting...which is tragic. There are enough holes in his military record to drive a semi-truck through. The same sort of “stay and course” and “we don’t cut and run” rhetoric was going on ten-fold in the exact time frame that Bush was in the Guard. Instead of going to Vietnam....he bravely remained stateside to protect the Alabama and Texas coastlines from Vietcong attacks.

I was amazed at the hair-trigger, ferocious attacks that occurred almost immediately after so-called “forged” memo appeared. Note: Proportional fonts DID exist at that time and other documents have surfaced showing this, but the castrated media is too afraid to report on this. At first I thought that this was a deliberate, fake memo planted by Rove to discredit any reports of Bush’s military record....now I don’t believe this. It’s obvious that a very successful shredding job was done on critical memos which might have exposed the truth about George “I’m the Decider's” past. It’s my theory that this memo is real and that Rove + Bush’s goons were aware that they missed one and that it was only a matter of time before it was discovered. They luckily had their own copy and they had a massive, pre-emptive attack plan in place...ready to go the second anyone released this memo. The issue turned into “proportional fonts” rather than how Bush mysteriously jumped to first place on a 100,000 long waiting list to get into the Guard after scoring the lowest possible qualifying score to get in....in just two days.

The USA is rapidly becoming a mythology-based society ...there is only one accepted version of events and woe be to anyone to tries to challenge it

Sometimes presidents redeem themselves when they are out of office...Bush/Cheney and Judy Miller should become orderlies/nurses aides at Walter Reed Medical Center...cleaning up the sh*t, piss and vomit of the critically wounded soldiers....brave soldiers who naively bought the WMD-lies and phony 9-11 Iraq link con-job that Bush, Cheney and Judy Miller are responsible for spreading...Brave soldiers who were not whiny, trust-fund kids who had rich, powerful families who could intervene and get them out of combat duty. Note: GA. Senator Max Chambliss should be forced to work in the amputee ward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "proportional fonts" Posted by: aurora2484
"How I got it does not matter."
Posted by: wb1977 on Jun 23, 2006 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What bullshit comment.
It absolutely matters.
I am no fan of Bush, but how you get information is as important as the information itself.
You say this comes from a 'letter'...well publish the goddamn letter.
Otherwise, it's all he said she said, and he keeps getting away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US Navy retired
Posted by: ejboyle@olypen.com on Jun 23, 2006 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How did a Military Deserter in time of war ever become eligible to run for the office of the President of the USA? And now he and his gang of draft dodgers are passing judgement on our men and women who are refusing to go to Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: US Navy retired Posted by: CatDad
» RE: US Navy retired Posted by: sheena2u
It is the tried and true Republican strategy,
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jun 23, 2006 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you can't discredit it, destroy it. It has worked successfully because the American public is generally f'in stupid. I used to think they were uninformed due to the abyssmal media in this country, but this government and media can only exist when the public allows it. PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY ARE GETTING THE GOVERNMENT THEY DESERVE BECAUSE THEY ARE F'IN LAZY AND STUPID.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Independent World Television is coming!
Posted by: Thom Speidel on Jun 23, 2006 12:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Dan Rather had worked for a television network independent of corporate and government funding, he could have told these truths without these consequences. Fortunately for our democracy, such a network is coming! Visit www.iwtnews.com and help bring the truth to prime time television.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Harriet Miers for Supreme Court!
Posted by: cold2touch on Jun 23, 2006 1:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dubya said she was the single most qualified American for that position when he nominated her (Alito is second).
Her qualification? A liveried, baggage carrying monkey for Bush household.
She says that Bush is the greatest genius she'd ever come across.
It takes one to know one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DAN SAW IT COMIN - NOW?? DO WE?
Posted by: chanceny on Jun 23, 2006 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Again, mr. Pallast has gotten his hands on documentation that proves the case he is uncovering. He must be Zelig-like. It probably is much less cumbersome uncovering papered-over paper trails in Great Britain, but it's still awe-inspiring when he submits his exceedingly well written, easy to follow playbooks of detailed treasonous corruption. Dan Rather held onto his anchor chair by his fingernails for ages. Whether this 'forgery' did him in or not this time, it surely was in the wind! you can turn on the tv, switch to any of the networks, and see the exact same stories covered. They just mix up the order of presentation. Dan liked to stray off the restricted reservation of talking points journalism. A big no-no nowadays. The complete story of this overly priveledged fortunate son was known in certain circles. Hell. Mollly Ivans for one was takin the bloom off the bush for years. But when it became obvious the power elite was gonna be using W as their spokesmodel, the clamping down went into supermode! No one would ever want an ex druggie, alkie, failed bizman and National Guard duty-evader, except Cheney, who knows a great manchurian candidate when he scopes one thru his lethal lens. Whitewash, elevate and exaggerate - Propogate the propaganda you pandering press or pffff you go! Bye bye Dan! Fear not - Katie the perky will cover Georgie the smirky with all due gravitas!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dan Rather Put's the BS in CBS
Posted by: ClassicLib on Jun 23, 2006 2:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rather deserved to get shit-canned. He ran a fake story and that is called "propaganda" not journalism. Considering Dem's are supposed to be champions of all things good and Pure. You would think that you would have some integrity and call him out on his bull-chite. Journalists are supposed to be dispassionate. They tell you the news and you make up your own mind. Somewhere Dan the man became a partisan and that is when he stopped being a journalist.

Peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dan Rather Put's the BS in CBS Posted by: Lincoln fan
Didn't know about the Miers connection
Posted by: vangogh69 on Jun 23, 2006 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, this shit is so corrupt, I had no idea! It figues that Miers has a link to W, circa 60's/70's! Someone, really, needs to make a documentary or a book detailing the connections all these individuals working for or connected to this administration have with previous administrations/regimes, corporations, oil companies, etc. (For practical purposes, we could start with Granddaddy Bush's connection to the Nazis during WWII and work up from there.)

Good night and good luck if Couric is supposed to be a "Journalist" now. Last I checked, she was good at agreeing with whatever her guests said. Facts have never troubled her precious mind, I'm sure. (Is that the secret to staying blonde, tan, and happy in a post 9/11, post-Katrina USA?) Then again, to be fair, I stopped being able to stomach her after she got all wet for Navy Seals ("you guys rock"). That was just too much, especially as the US was bombing Afghanistan and Iraq back into the stone age.

Though I don't have a source to cite it, hasn't it been the case that the number of viewers of television news and print have declined sharply over the past few years, with more and more people relying on the (as of this writing) "free" internet? I think more and more people are waking up to the b.s. and stopped relying on Rather to report the news, years ago (to use one example, did Rather do a story on the "peacekeeping mission"
in Panama a while back? I think not!). I seem to recall a shady 2000 Presidental Election which CBS (and Rather) were a bit quiet on...

Couris replaces Rather and Britney Spears & Angelina Jolie get interviews on Prime Time Television (!) for, hmm let's see, HAVING BABIES! Whew, welcome to America 2006 baby!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bob Schieffer
Posted by: bannelee on Jun 23, 2006 3:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bob Schieffer if a friend of the Bush's,according to his autobiography.No suprise there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE SUICIDE OF CBS NEWS
Posted by: xbj on Jun 23, 2006 3:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously, a decision was made at the very top to completely suicide the CBS News division, to divest itself from its long legacy of truth and journalistic integrity, and to enter, willingly, the darkside of money from the blood of innocents.

At this point, it's no loss whatsoever, because all they had left was a legacy.

But it just goes to show how far BEYOND the Red Hysteria of the 50's we've gone, when Karl Rove can gleefully add to his resume that he singlehandedly brought down the stellar 44-year career of one of broadcasting's greatest and most respected journalists, and with it, an entire network news division, by planting faked papers that just happened to tell the absolute truth about an AWOL coke-snorting a**hole loser, AND an accurate story that had already been told on the BBC!

SCREW and F*CK your so-called "profits", CBS, what kind of MESSAGE does this send to the rest of the world of TV news, and indeed, journalism? Never mind Rather's personal likeability or lack of friends behind the scenes, that's IRRELEVANT. What is relevant that ALL JOURNALISTS NOW have a sword over their heads. Who can report the truth now without fearing the wrath of Rove? If they could bring down Rather, they could bring down anyone.

What a bunch of cowardly sniveling a**holes you are. You deserve every bit of the future failure you are going to reap, and reap mightily.

I see your future, CBS News: a government controlled and run broadcast, paid for by taxpayers, THAT NO ONE WILL WATCH BECAUSE IT'S NOTHING BUT LYING CRAPOGANDA.

Why not just put "deeply embedded" Lara Logan in as anchor instead of Couric? With an American Flag armband, in fatigues? You'd save a ton, and the results would be the same... FAUX NEWS II.

Or better yet, Ann Coulter? Cheaper than Logan, and not even a journalist. PERFECT.

Pathetic. And a fate richly deserved.

And earned.

Good night and good friggin' luck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rather: 9 million a year
Posted by: wleming on Jun 23, 2006 4:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Palast tells an old story: a newsreader, reported to have been making 9 million dollars a year, soft soaps a story about a sitting president. CBS, Rather's employer, can get rid of Rather, and curry favor, by cutting Rather and his producer loose-for telling the truth. They kill two birds with one stone: the troublesome Rather is cut, and the story plays with the White House and the Right Wing Public.
Have there been other stories like these? There have been many, and Rather got passes on all of those. Weep not for Mr. Rather, but for a corporate media system in the business of deluding and confusing what it cannot ignore. To paraphrase Mr. Palast: it IS the best press that money can buy. And we do have a Free Press.. just so long as you own one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sacking The Opposition
Posted by: eyeman on Jun 23, 2006 7:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are we in America the last to know or notice. I remember seeing Mike Wallace on 60 minutes looking soooo shocked when Putin told him that Rather was fired because he opposes The US policies. Why does cheney and Rice act sooo like "champions of freedom and democracy". Democracy is meaningless if the public is mis-informed or uninformed. And our media are tools in these people's hands.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CBS has let America down!
Posted by: sheena2u on Jun 23, 2006 11:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for a wonderful article, and interesting postings. As for me I believe the information on GWB was correct. And, I believe the way Dan Rather was treated was shameful. Those Right Wing bullies will have their day. Its just a matter of time. Its not as if GWB is a decorated war hero, or a self made man. He has taken the easy way out all his life, and doesn't seem to mind putting others in harm's way if it suits his designs. Is anyone else out there disgusted about this? As for the state of the network news, yes this is also tragic. CBS and the other mainstream network news sources have let America down!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Combat Vet
Posted by: jct3 on Jun 24, 2006 2:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find everything Mr. Palast says in this article to be completely believable and, unfortunately, not at all surprising. I have also admired Mr. Palast’s other writing for some time. However, based on his statement that “only one class [of Americans] fight their Daddy’s dirty little wars,” I do want to caution him about too easily generalizing about Americans based upon the sorry examples provided by the Messrs. Bush and their fellow travelers. This statement may be mostly true, but it is not always true. To illustrate, I’ll relate a small personal story which, while perhaps a bit extraordinary is by no means unique. I do not belong to the less-than-one-per-cent of Americans whose families own and control the United States and its policies, but my parents were landed, financially comfortable and socially prominent. My father was a psychiatrist in private practice in a major city and my mother wrote a newspaper society column. In 1969, when I received my draft notice, it never occurred to me to try to “get out of it” even though I had long before concluded that Vietnam was a terrible mistake that was killing Americans and Vietnamese for no defensible reason. It also never crossed my mind to ask my father if he could do something to get me out of serving. I was not and am not a super-patriot or a blinders-on, my-country-right-or-wrong person. However, my ancestors had lived in what’s now the United States for 300 years and had fought in every war from the French and Indian to World War II (except a couple of short ones when no one had been of fighting age), and I was a simple, law-abiding patriot – and remain one. Anyway, I reported for duty, ended up in the Army and served as an infantry sergeant / squad leader in Vietnam and Cambodia. I returned home in 1971 with several medals and a piece of shrapnel from a Chinese hand grenade in my leg. A few months later, my father said, “You know son, I could easily have kept you out of the military.” I was astounded. “How?” I asked. “All I had to do was ask any of several friends who are GPs or surgeons to examine you and they would have written up some medical condition and you would have been classified 4-F.” [4-F was the draft classification for men medically unfit for military service.] “Why didn’t you do it, then?” I asked. He answered simply, “Because it wouldn’t have been right.” “I’m glad you didn’t,” I said quietly, and we never spoke of it again. I relate this story because it is not unique. There are some Americans who know the true meaning of honor, courage, integrity, and proper ethical behavior. Occasionally, our highest offices can be held by people who don’t have the foggiest notion what these character traits are. Sadly, now is such a time, but please Mr. Palast don’t give up on us as a people or a nation. America may be experiencing one of its darkest hours, but we have good, highly principled people among us who may yet right the ship of state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Truth as Estimated
Posted by: robmikejas on Jun 24, 2006 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've said it many times since the re-election of Richard Milhous Nixon..."never underestimate the ignorance of the American People". When 50% or more of the sheep in the meadow are so easily sheparded over the cliff, you have a lot of undeniable damage to the farm. It's too late now folks...it's over...the great American Dream is over. Prepare for total subjucation or total revolution...but as for the Dream? It's over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't cry for Dan Rather
Posted by: Meehan on Jun 24, 2006 7:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This multi-millionaire establishment gatekeeper never wavered in his role as lapdog.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's Recruit Dan!
Posted by: Steven Wanzell on Jun 24, 2006 2:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether he admits it or not, he's now shark feed in the mainstream media. If the allusions that he's a reformer of our lost democratic system is true, he needs to join us. Perhaps even as a New Party co-founder and leader. What ARE you made of, Dan? And, what ARE you made of, America?

Steven Wanzell
artist/activist/ex-American
www.wanzellarts.com.ar

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Add Pat Robertson & Daddy to the Cheating Cowards list- Again.
Posted by: Matt Clarke RocklandME on Jun 25, 2006 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pat Pobertson also had his Daddy get him out of a troop movement ( a courtmartial offence) possible combat assgnment in the Korean War, but he made the mistake of boasting in the face of all facts that he was a " combat Marine offcier veterean" when he ran for President. One real combat decorated Marine officer however knew the truth and said so, namely Congressman Pete Mc Closkey, who has written it up in his book The Taking of Hill 610. The book includes all the proof that he provided for his defense of a libel suit by Pat Robertson that Pat dropped as soon as he stopped running for President.
Included also is a letter from Senator John Warner on behalf of Pat Robertson which is clearly a cover up attempt for Pat aimed at helping Pat lie.

Copies of the book were given all members of the First Special Basic Class of the Korean War (October to December 1950) including me, and some notables such as Senator Warner, Judge Bork, Frank Cappiello, Bob Boyle. All of us new "68 day wonders" (in our case), got orders December 1950, the month of the Chosin Resevoir heroic battle/retreat. Including McCloskey and Warner.
Pat's orders were changed from Korean to Japan because he Daddy explicitlydid not want him near any of that nasty activity. General Shepard did the deed and later became Commandant. Senator Warner did his deed later and continues to represent Pat Robertson territory.

Mc Closkey's book: c 1992 Eaglet Books Woodside CA. He is back in the news, acting well as usual. And Senator Warner is about to investigate Haditha, his second such investigation. The first did not get very far up. Stay tuned for more elite leadership by the Honorables.
Matthew K Clarke Rockland Maine

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Long time passing
Posted by: Burton on Jun 25, 2006 3:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Trying to prove a 30 year old murder case is hard enough. But a 30 year old AWOL case? Come on.

Even if Bush was a fullscale deserter, the story was too old to make a difference. The GOP faithful would have (and did) back "W" no matter what.

As for Greg Pallast, I've heard him on Radio Pacifica and he is full of himself. Like too many Pacifica stories, this one works great when the left is talking to itself. It self-destructs when it gets out to the general public. The White House made mince-meat out of it.

We know George Bush was a Naval Aviator because it says so right on his toy box.

Actually, his father was a naval aviator in WW2. "W" was in the Texas Air National Guard, which has nothing to do with the Navy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Old Media Whores never die, They just fade away!
Posted by: williameon on Jun 26, 2006 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rather takes one for the Gipper!

Set up
Knock down
Just another
Media Clown.

He was imbedded in
The Corporate Press
On the way out
He said:
I will do my best!

To side line
The
Truth
And
Spread
BU__! SH__!
One last time!

Then
Glori-fry me
Nail me to the
Media Faux
Then
Burn me
In effigy!
So all can see!

How I took the Bullet
For Kennedy
His head moved backwards!
For all to see.

I’d rather not say
Who they are

Just
Turn on the Boob Tube
&
Let
The Jeanie
Come:
Out of the Jar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palast is loose with the facts
Posted by: gramsci on Jun 27, 2006 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason the BBC's website doesn't jibe with what Palast is claiming: Palast got the letter from Bill Burkett, the same guy who provided Rather's producer with the documents that turned out to be forgeries (who was Palast's primary source on his doc on Bush's war service that aired on BBC in '04 which is apparently what Palast's referring to when he claims that "the BBC reported," when in fact he reported it, and the BBC ran it.)

(The fact is, Palast hasn't been employed by BBC for at least three years since he moved back to the U.S. to split his time between the building he owns in NYC, and his rented house in the Hamptons.)

This answers the question asked in another post above about why the BBC posting on its site doesn't match Palast's claims-- when the Burkett was discredited, the Palast piece had already run on BBC; now they know better, as does anyone who has followed this story closely.

Just for a little clarity: Moonves didn't fire Rather and after the report ran, as Palast implies, he fired the producer for running a major piece in the middle of a presidential election based on a document that was a clear forgery, easily discovered by bloggers and then picked up in the mainstream press as a scandal (remember how it was written on a computer rather than on a typewriter, etc?) Now, two years later, he's fired Dan Rather too, probably partly for this report, and partly because he's no longer a viable commodity -- if it were really just about the report, why didn't it happen back in 2004 when CBS was much more concerned about covering its ass with the Bush administration?

I would never claim that CBS is a model for journalistic integrity, or that if someone had run a faulty investigative piece on Kerry (or certainly on anyone to his left) that heads would have rolled necessarily, but in the end, a network should fire journalists who fail to do basic research into their sources and source documents, especially on serious matters in which the leadership of the country hangs in the balance: imagine if the story were done with what evidence exists, even just what's on Wikipedia, and the whole story hadn't been blown up into a scandal? (It's worth mentioning here that Burkett probably was not knowingly passing forged documents around-- it has been alleged that he got them from Repug dirty trickster Roger Stone, possibly with the complicity of Karl Rove who then used CBS's broadcast to turn the entire issue, which was real, into a scandal that in the end helped Bush in framing the "liberal media" as out to get him, etc.)

Palast is exactly what the left doesn't need: sloppy, ego-driven, scoop-hound personality journalism that is fast and loose with the facts in order to give him a foot-up on everyone else who takes the time to do real, careful, and yes, sometimes mundane investigative reporting. It's no good when CBS does it, and it's even worse when someone who's so vocal about the need for integrity in other people's journalism, and in their politics generally, lacks integrity so completely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement