Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

FCC Investigates Fake News

By Andrew Buncombe, Independent UK. Posted May 31, 2006.


The FCC is investigating dozens of American television stations for airing Bush-produced propaganda and passing it off as 'real news.'
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Federal authorities are actively investigating dozens of American television stations for broadcasting items produced by the Bush administration and major corporations, and passing them off as normal news. Some of the fake news segments talked up success in the war in Iraq, or promoted the companies' products.

Investigators from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are seeking information about stations across the country after a report produced by a campaign group detailed the extraordinary extent of the use of such items.

The report, by the non-profit group Center for Media and Democracy, found that over a 10-month period at least 77 television stations were making use of the faux news broadcasts, known as Video News Releases (VNRs). Not one told viewers who had produced the items.

"We know we only had partial access to these VNRs and yet we found 77 stations using them," said Diana Farsetta, one of the group's researchers. "I would say it's pretty extraordinary. The picture we found was much worse than we expected going into the investigation in terms of just how widely these get played and how frequently these pre-packaged segments are put on the air."

Ms. Farsetta said the public relations companies commissioned to produce these segments by corporations had become increasingly sophisticated in their techniques in order to get the VNRs broadcast. "They have got very good at mimicking what a real, independently produced television report would look like," she said.

The FCC has declined to comment on the investigation but investigators from the commission's enforcement unit recently approached Ms. Farsetta for a copy of her group's report.

The range of VNR is wide. Among items provided by the Bush administration to news stations was one in which an Iraqi-American in Kansas City was seen saying "Thank you Bush. Thank you USA" in response to the 2003 fall of Baghdad. The footage was actually produced by the State Department, one of 20 federal agencies that have produced and distributed such items.

Many of the corporate reports, produced by drug manufacturers such as Pfizer, focus on health issues and promote the manufacturer's product. One example cited by the report was a Halloween segment produced by the confectionery giant Mars, which featured Snickers, M&Ms and other company brands. While the original VNR disclosed that it was produced by Mars, such information was removed when it was broadcast by the television channel -- in this case a Fox-owned station in St Louis, Missouri.

Bloomberg news service said that other companies that sponsored the promotions included General Motors, the world's largest car maker, and Intel, the biggest maker of semi-conductors. All of the companies said they included full disclosure of their involvement in the VNRs. "We in no way attempt to hide that we are providing the video," said Chuck Mulloy, a spokesman for Intel. "In fact, we bend over backward to make this disclosure."

The FCC was urged to act by a lobbying campaign organized by Free Press, another non-profit group that focuses on media policy. Spokesman Craig Aaron said more than 25,000 people had written to the FCC about the VNRs. "Essentially it's corporate advertising or propaganda masquerading as news," he said. "The public obviously expects their news reports are going to be based on real reporting and real information. If they are watching an advertisement for a company or a government policy, they need to be told."

The controversy over the use of VNRs by television stations first erupted last spring. At the time the FCC issued a public notice warning broadcasters that they were obliged to inform viewers if items were sponsored. The maximum fine for each violation is $32,500.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
No surprise!
Posted by: kgs1947 on May 31, 2006 3:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article reveals no surprise to me. The range of unethical behavior is extensive, and I'm certainly not surprised about FOX "news" using such ploys. Why is this not a surprise? The Bush administration has used deceit continuously to promote it's public policies (and clandestine operations). Big Daddy government gets away with it, so why shouldn't the sons and daughters of corporations...which Bush and his cronies protect resulting in the demise of the middle and lower classes in the USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NO, NO, Big Suprise! Posted by: peritonlogon
Adequate Response?
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on May 31, 2006 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A $32,000 fine seems like a big penalty for an individual, but for a commercial radio station or for FAUX News it is pocket change.

Something that would be a big deal to these stations and networks would be the loss of their license and this is actually another possible penalty. License renewals occur periodically and are generally granted by the FCC in a perfunctory manner. However, the law requires that for the license to be renewed, the station demonstrate that it has been operating in the public interest. The public can file objections with the FCC to these license renewals with a claim that the station is not acting in the public interest.

The threat of loss of a single license to operate would send a message stronger than many $32,000 fines.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Adequate Response? Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Adequate Response? Posted by: petusthefetus
» RE: Adequate Response? Posted by: Habaro
» RE: Adequate Response? Posted by: Kelly
The Corpo-Pirates Web of Deceit!
Posted by: williameon on May 31, 2006 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Con-Glomerates Destroy Free Speech!

The Corpo-Pirates scuttling of the
American ship of State
Continues!
As
They spread their:
Web of deceit!
Miss-information, lies and treason.
The cross pollination
Of
The Corpo-Pirate Board rooms
Goes on
Unabated.
Coincidence of circumstance.
Secrecy and collusion.
The Pirates have used the power of the government to
Feather their own nests and
Legalize larceny and treason.
The media is being used as an indoctrination tool.
The methods are subliminal, repetitive, addictive and hypnotic.
It’s Animal Farm and 1984 rolled into one.
It’s a fake new world.
The food supply is filled with carcinogens and poisons.
Specifically:
High Fructose Corn Syrup, Hydrogenated oils, over refined flours, heavy metals, dyes and chemicals.
The health care system is terribly broken.
There s a disconnect between Corpo-Pirate Fantasy and
The American Reality.
Backed by Drug Companies, AMA, FDA, OSHA, FCC, Mercenary Politicians and Lawyers.
The American people are sold a phony bill of goods.
The Mime Police have spread their tentacles though out industry and government.
The Bones rule the world though secrecy, collusion, violence, crime and treason.
Just at the time that we have the capacity to decentralize the system and make it more user friendly and benefit all,
They have used the power to usurp our Freedom and centralize it for their own selfish desire:
GREED!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Could people please Posted by: peritonlogon
At the risk of sounding completely cynical I will not be holding my
Posted by: Timba on May 31, 2006 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
breath waiting for the FCC loaded with Bush appointees to come down hard on this issue. I suspect the investigation is just what they felt was necessary to take some of the heat off. Don't expect any real penalties for any of the big players in this, at most they will burn a small inconsequential player at the stake and then claim they have solved the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Further more... Posted by: aonghus36
$32,500 - a threat?
Posted by: goldennugget on May 31, 2006 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
$32,500 - a threat? Really? What would the cost be to "the company" if their "news" items were presented as advertisements? How simple-minded, how easily bamboozled we Americans are. How very sad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well, when you consider Posted by: peritonlogon
Lets go after the licenses
Posted by: kevintaute on May 31, 2006 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the television news is not properly providing the viewer the disclosures, then the station is not acting in the "public interest". And that is how we should approach it. We the viewers should request a list of stations that aired the "VNR" as actual news and file a complaint that the station is not acting in the public interest. This should be filed with the FCC. If everyone reading (ok - maybe 10% would do it) would file a complaint, the stations would be risking their license to broadcast by doing it!

GO AFTER THE LICENSE of the station!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lets go after the licenses Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
Conspiracy theory! Cuckoo Cocoa Puffs! Conspiracy theory! Cuckoo Cocoa Puffs!
Posted by: cry0fan on May 31, 2006 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Conspiracy theory! Cuckoo Cocoa Puffs!
Conspiracy theory! Cuckoo Cocoa Puffs!
Conspiracy theory! Cuckoo Cocoa Puffs!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And you're surprised?
Posted by: packofwolves on May 31, 2006 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can anyone out there be surprised at the fact that we're being spoon-fed good phoney news by the Bush Administration while protesters are kept out of sight and our phone calls are being monitored? Bush said it at the beginning of his first term, he wants to be dictator. I'm surprised very few people actually heard or admitted he said that and he's doing everything he can to be just that. Better wake up America or it's going to be too late. IMPEACH BUSH. GET BACK ON TRACK AMERICA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And you're surprised? Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: And you're surprised? Posted by: gathaiga
FAKE NEWS AND THE ROOTS OF THE CIA
Posted by: MagmaReport on May 31, 2006 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The CIA has always been into into misinformation and propaganda.
To understand the general mission of the CIA, one must recall the roots of the Agency, which are precisely two military operations against Nazi Germany: FORTITUDE and ENIGMA.
Here I will discuss Operation Fortitude, which convinced the Nazis that Normandy was not the focus of the Allied invasion. Fortitude was the codename of the Allied operation to deceive the German High Command into thinking that the 1944 invasion of Western Europe (Operation Overlord) would happen someplace other than Normandy.
The Operation was a masterpiece of deceptive propaganda. Its delicate elaboration and success have made it half of the matrix from which the CIA will rise in order to fight another war on another enemy--the Cold War.

Read more on The MagMa Report

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gathaiga
Posted by: gathaiga on Jun 2, 2006 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bushco is in control so nothing substantive will come of the "investigation".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement