Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bloggers Strike Back

By Glenn Greenwald, AlterNet. Posted May 11, 2006.


Reporting from the blogosphere has already changed the face of politics, journalism and even publishing. And the changes have only just begun.
greenwald-book-cover
greenwald book cover
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

With the consolidation of news media in this country, many Americans are frustrated by the closed and corporatized outlets for news and opinion. The same set of pundits have spewed their opinions, the same handful of established media outlets have decided what constitutes news and citizens have long been forced to just listen.

The blogosphere is changing all of that. Blogs are now a full-fledged alternative venue where citizens can directly communicate with and inform one another without having to rely only on establishment media sources. And they can obtain news analysis from a virtually infinite set of voices. Since its inception, though, the blogosphere has been largely self-contained, with bloggers able to exert influence on the dialogue within the blogosphere but having almost no influence outside of it.

But that is now changing, too.

The growth of the blogosphere's influence -- both in terms of the sheer numbers who participate in the blogosphere and the growing appreciation of its importance -- renders inevitable the growing influence of bloggers outside of the blogsphere. The blogosphere is pursuing this opportunity by developing mechanisms to enable bloggers to demand a voice in the national political dialogue.

A little more than two weeks ago, on April 25, my forthcoming book, "How Would a Patriot Act?" jumped in just over 12 hours from No. 50,925 on Amazon's best-seller list all the way to No. 1, where it remained for the next four days. It reached the top spot despite the fact that it is not even scheduled to be released until May 15, and despite the fact that the publisher has not yet spent a single penny on advertising, beyond the cost of employee staff time to reach out via the internet.

The book's jump to No. 1 was galvanized exclusively by a discussion of the book's imminent release by a handful of liberal bloggers, including some with the largest blog readership on the web. The recommendation of these bloggers, combined with the familarity of many in the blogosphere with the work I have been doing on these issues at my blog, Unclaimed Territory, generated some much-appreciated enthusiasm, which drove the book to the top spot.

My book is purely a blogosphere book: Working Assets Publishing approached me about writing this book -- the new publisher's first book -- based solely on the contents of my blog. The book's ideas and arguments were developed almost exclusively as a result of writing for and interacting with my blog community. The research for the book was done primarily by my readers, and I discovered many of the arguments and much of the evidence in the book as a result of reading comments on my blog, as well as from reading the posts of my fellow political bloggers.

There are a few other blogger books currently on the market, including "Crashing the Gate" by Jerome Armstrong and Markos Moulitsas, "Get this Party Started" by Chris Bowers and "Hostile Takeover" by David Sirota. Publishing books by bloggers, the ideas for which largely emerge from the blogosphere, is clearly a model that works and will only grow.

Beyond books, it is becoming commonplace for well-known bloggers to appear on television as new pundits, to be given prominent op-ed space in the nation's largest newspapers or to be quoted as experts on various political matters in major news stories.

And bloggers are not only talking about the news, but making it, too. John Aravosis of AmericaBlog all but single-handedly broke and drove the Jeff Gannon story with original reporting on his blog. This month, Congress enacted legislation protecting the privacy of cell phone numbers as a result of Aravosis' discovery that companies were selling cell numbers for a low fee. A recent Time magazine article reported on an online argument between blogger Matt Stoller and anonymous high-level congressional staffers regarding whether Democrats are sufficiently tough and aggressive in the political tactics they use.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Glenn Greenwald is a constitutional law attorney and chief blogger at Unclaimed Territory.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Blogs are not that great
Posted by: anothername on May 11, 2006 2:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as the print and broadcast media love to report about themselves, the blogosphere loves to talk about itself. That does not mean it is the most important news, however.

Forgive my inaccurate memory, but in one day (or one week) in the 1970s (or 1980s), a poster of one then-current TV pin-up actress sold something like 7 million copies. So forgive me for not being overwhelmed that 50,000 copies a book not yet published have been sold at Amazon.com.

The popular blogs continue to be tied to print or broadcast media or to be tied to open use websites. Moreover, while bloggers have received considerable news coverage for fact checking comments, they continue to be poor representations of original and responsible reporting or, more importantly, investigative journalism.

In addition, the time journalists take to update blogs gives them less time to get their primary work done. Just as I laugh at the Saturday radio address of the president and the opposition party's response, because they have so many outlets to be heard that one weekly radio speech is silly and is rarely even listened to by most Americans, blogs are extraneous for established news outlets.

There are always exceptions and perhaps the Pulitzers should start including a blog award for outstanding commentary and another one for outstanding reporting, and allow for a non-professional category for each.

As for blogs allowing people the opportunity to speak freely, I've never had any problem being able to do that simply by writing letters to the editors of the newspapers and other publications that I read or broadcasts that I watch or hear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» some questions Posted by: Capybara
» RE: Blogs are not that great Posted by: anothername
» RE: Blogs are not that great Posted by: the poet
JUST THE BEGINNING......
Posted by: Captainmagic on May 11, 2006 3:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There underlies the importance of this wonderfull inteligence gathering tool..just as it can be used to filter info to agencies databases it will also flood the ether with the WILL of the peoples...just as you feel the passion of the crowd when you are at magor sporting event, you will also see a plight and feel it across the world overnight...it is the passion or plight of the few who will be resqued by the many who will be able to rise as a collective and prevent the lie from entrenching itself like a parasite into an otherwise unwary world...there is not a more spectacular invention that can ignite the peoples of our planet for a just cause, than the internet..we need more systems in space other than a solely american net...the sooner the better. This is just the beginning...educate your young as to how evil comes about and let them know a just course..the internet will take care of the rest..to know is to be forewarned....I say to your governments ignore this power at your peril....the land of the gun is out of step...bigtime.

Captain OUT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» excellent comment. Posted by: qrswave
CAN WE PLEASE HAVE...
Posted by: Captainmagic on May 11, 2006 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A bold song written with all the lies and can we have a video clip of the results of the illegal war in Iraq, that the U.F.S.A has inflicted on this soveriegn nation, (superimposed over the top) and please make it as graffic as possible with powerful words and send it underground so that it can rise up and point to the perpatrators of this stain, as the true jackals of our millennia..bu$hCo..please make it something we can all march to...BECAUSE HERE WE COME....Good bye ..Good riddance!!!!

Captain OUT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

definitely
Posted by: rsaxto on May 11, 2006 4:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blogging is definitely a viable and influential medium but it is subject to the same basics as other media. You have to sort out the junk from the good stuff. The best blog feature is that just about anyone can blog without having to kowtow to corporate or other highly biased patrons. Another good feature is that it is basically free and you don't have the delay of going through an established bureauocracy beholden to some corrupt agenda. It is democracy-building at its best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the incestuous blogosphere, dominated by the Great Mentioners, purges ideological outriders
Posted by: cry0fan on May 11, 2006 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the politically oriented blogosphere had and has great promise, but has sadly failed to live up to it.

Several reasons I can see:
1. The Great Mentioners of the mass media elevate certain blogs and forums to greater visibility by MENTIONING them in the mass media. The ones that they mention are those that cleave unto the "conventional wisdom" , the Washington consensus. If not, such blogs are not mentioned, and those that do cleave are mentioned and gain visibility and money and consulting fees and so forth.

THey provide the model for the others to follow. Monkey see monkey do.

politcal blogs and forums that are mentioned are those that purge the posters and commentors who are ideological outriders. Thus the ideological hegemony is maintained.

For example, here is something for you. Why is it that on all those fervid and incestuous pseudoLiberal blogs that this idea has not gained much recognition: the reason that the welfare state cannot gain popular approval is that the American left orients it towards the poor, who are a MINORITY of the citizens. In Europe, the welfare is mostly for the middle class. Thus, the right cannot demonize the welfare state, but the middle class has its nose right in the middle of it all. THe poor are taken care of better there than here because the welfare state cannot be demonized as well there. So what the left has to do is get the middle class on the welfare state, paid for by progressive taxation. RIght now, the American middle class get breaks via the tax code. Not the same thing.

So why is it that the American left is not all over this idea?

Because the American left is made up of political animals, who are actually megaconformists. In the blogosphere, all but conformists are ousted. So you have this slavish groupthink that simply accepts ideas from the most prominent of the bloggers, the ones that were made prominent by the great mentioners of the mass media.....

First step is to acknowledge the problem....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Echo chamber for the brainwashed
Posted by: BJT on May 11, 2006 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What good is a blogosphere if all the participants have been indoctrinated by government schools? The blogosphere that runs "against" the current administration is a cesspool of exactly the whiny socialist bellyaching that the global elites WANT.

Want to be truly revolutionary? Blog for a return to true laizzes-faire, blog for a return to a true free market, blog for a return to the constitutional REPUBLIC, not democracy! Blog for individual liberty and personal responsibility, not goverment programs and handouts. If our current government officials are so corrupt, what makes you think your Democrats or Greens are going to be any different?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Want to be truly revolutionary? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: more ridiculous nonsense Posted by: thoughtcriminal
How a Patriot ACTS
Posted by: wawa on May 11, 2006 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before 9/11, I did not give too much thought for another beyond my rural community. I was apolitical, thought the world had already gone mad and there was nothing much anyone could do or say to change it

But after 9/11 I got really restless and began asking a lot of politically incorrect questions. I have never been satisfied with easy answers. And so I began the research to discover why a small group of people hated Americans so much, that they would do something as evil as targeting and cold bloodedly murdering innocent people. That research led me to write an historcial fact filled memoir of a 1948 Palestinian refugee and travel 3 times into Israel Palestine and give birth to WAWA:
http://www.wearewideawake.org/

May 17-20, I will be reporting on TIKKUN's 2nd Network of Spiritual Progressives Conference in DC and on May 18 TIKKUN will be presenting a New Bottom Line to Congress.

Members of Tikkun are diverse in our faith/spiritual beliefs but we
are ALL PATRIOTS who disagree with the current Administration.

My experience at the 1st TIKKUN conference for Spiritual Progressives became:
Chapter 2: The Revolution has started now...
everything is FREE on:
http://www.wearewideawake.org/


"We have it in our power to change the world"-Tom Paine

May we all DO SOMETHING to make it happen

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Congratulations on the top spot
Posted by: micheleweldon on May 11, 2006 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, kudos for climbing up the Amazon totem. That is no small feat.
I agree with you completely about how blogs have changed journalism, and I suggest a few other ways blogs have changed newspapers. I just finished writing a book, "Everyman News," about the dramatic shift in tone, sourcing and story content in American newspapers in the last five years. One reason --out of 8 --is blogs.

Blogs have changed writing style, made mainstream journalism more chatty, conversational and anecdotal. Without the style shift, it is like expecting readers to go from casual Friday to a black-tie event, moving from the ease and accessibility of blogs to a more structured, formal writing style in old-style, professional journalism. Readers prefer feeling included in the conversation, rather than allowed to peak in the closed dialogue between experts.

Also, the bottom-up sourcing approach in blogging (as opposed to top-down from official sources and experts in traditional media) has forced all newspaper stories to include more unofficial sources and ultimately to create a more democractic approach to voices and story topics in the paper. Sure, some stories have the token anecdotal lead as an afterthought, but more newspapers are writing and reporting stories about the effects of events and policies on ordinary citizens, rather than just delivering what Robert McChesney called "official source stenography."

My book isn't out until next year, but I think you are absolutely correct with what is in yours and I look forward to reading it. I approached mine from a cultural standpoint, not political. And hey, if next year I get blogged up the Amazon the way you did, that would be dandy too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More a Village, a bar and a Paper
Posted by: dancerkc on May 11, 2006 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really don't think there is anything that new going on with blogs. It is just a current-technology response to the geographic breadth of our newly large village.

This really reminds me of my work years ago on a small-town newspaper covering an area in upstate New York. There are Mayberries all over and this locale was one of them.

The old reminder that the locals in the local bars knew more of what was going on than the newspaper was usually true. They also spread more unfounded rumors and plain gossip. Just like blogs. So, if they already knew more than I did, why did they want to see what I put out?

I would like to think it was because I fact-checked before sending in the stories. I eventually (small village/hamlet areas aren't always that open to us outsiders) found out that I did have a rep for getting the facts right and that I was considered honest and reliable. (pat on the old back)

However, I really think that in large part they wanted to see what they already knew printed in the paper, the local MSM.

Boiled down, the local bar stools (or equivalent), fresh with the best cracker-barrel gossip and opinionated patrons, was often as good a reality check as any editor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's payback for years of insults.
Posted by: RobW on May 11, 2006 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But beyond being just collaborative, the blogosphere is characterized by an independence and autonomy that is glaringly absent in the conventional national media venues.

This really is the crux of the debate. For decades, traditional media has become increasingly monolithic, controlled by fewer and larger corporations. The blogosphere exists as a direct reaction to that.

And also- in the effort to avoid the "liberal bias" tarbaby, and in an attempt to duplicate the financial success of FoxNews, the rest of the news networks and punditocracy at the major papers have been increasingly Fox-like. They avoid asking hard questions of the President or any Republican, while attacking every Democrat in sight.

There's a huge problem with this, besides the obvious unfairness of it- it's bad business. As the election results have shown, this country is very closely divided in partisanship. The presidential elections are decided by 0.1% margins. Thanks to gerrymandered districts, the party that holds the minority in Congress actually represents a larger number of voters.

In other words, the country is half Democrat, duh... Yet, the msm continues to act as if the Democrat party is "out of the mainstream" and talks of moonbats and disloyalty, while ignoring or downplaying actual crimes by Republicans.

This stands in stark contrast to the '90s, when Clinton was routinely castigated by the press, who never understood why he remained popular even during his impeachment. It's the policies, stupid.

After years of insults and lies, Democrats and liberals are starting to look elsewhere for their news, analysis, and opinion. As a result, the web-based media is gaining market share while the MSM loses its readers and viewers.

Big surprise there- keep insulting half the country, and half the country quits buying your product.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But wait, there's more! Posted by: RobW
BLESS THE BLOGGERS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 11, 2006 1:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just read most of the comments. There's no pleasing some people. I don't know how some of you define Freedon of Speech, but this is as good as it gets. If you don't believe that bloggers have made a difference, you're not paying attention. If you have something to say you're in the right place. If you insist upon being cynical go watch television. Some of us like to think that enough of us can make a difference. Thank you, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BLESS THE BLOGGERS Posted by: RobW
» RE: BLESS THE BLOGGERS Posted by: anothername
» RE: BLESS THE BLOGGERS Posted by: the poet
» RE: BLESS THE BLOGGERS Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: BLESS THE BLOGGERS Posted by: VZEQICVA
Bye-bye blogosphere....
Posted by: John Wall on May 11, 2006 4:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congress is about to pass a law that will place the 'net in the hands of those who really matter -- corporations. Check out http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/051106I.shtml

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bye-bye blogosphere.... Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: Bye-bye blogosphere.... Posted by: VZEQICVA
Yet Another Anti-Neoconservative Blog!
Posted by: alicelillie on May 15, 2006 2:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have just posted to my blog a piece called _The Roots of Neoconservatism_ that I believe shows the true authoritarian colors of the Bush administration.

Have a look and weigh in yourself!

http://www.alicelillieandher.blogspot.com .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Political-based Movie
Posted by: snsple on May 19, 2006 5:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm new here and have no idea how to find where to e-mail you. I'm working on a low budget, independent horror movie that is politically based. It's called "Zombie Outbreak" (www.zombieoutbreak.net) Basically, the president of the US ("President George Randolph") is trying to turn the country into zombies, starting with the south. There's a group of survivors, including two zombie hunters, who are trying to fight back (we'll see that more clearly in the second one) When it's finished (late July/August), would you be interested in reviewing it? sarah@zombieoutbreak.net is my e-mail address.

Thank you in advance!

Sarah Stennett
Director
sarah@zombieoutbreak.net
www.zombieoutbreak.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WMD
Posted by: mite on May 21, 2006 8:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Enjoy the freedom of the Blogs for the end is coming arround the corner. Every one keeps saying-" we have a Constitution and Bill of Rights". I will tell you again- people of the US- our freedoms are gone. The Congress gave our freedoms away with the passage of the National Security Act and Executive Orders of the President. Check out the Library of Congress or search the Web (while you can) for reference to: Senate Intelligence Authorization Act for Fisical Year 1991 (S.B. 2834).
My internet connection is monitored and restricted through my phone line- anything that relates to Bush, NSA, CIA, is blanked out on my screen, it really is done on this web site frequently, Hmm!
Do we really want to keep living in this DENIAL of the truth? While those in power keep fooling us about immigration, terror, our lives are controled through debt, water and food, and FEAR.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re: Pets of the 'GREAT MENTIONERS' + the Rest of Us
Posted by: ViaParadox on May 24, 2006 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RE: "the incestuous blogosphere, dominated by the Great Mentioners, purges ideological outriders
Posted by: cry0fan on May 11, 2006 4:42 AM "

I agree, for the most part, with cry0fan's comments (quoted below).
At last someone is saying what I've been thinking since the 2004 campaign. The blogosphere does not function democratically and, with the ever-increasing number of blogs, I don't see how it can be changed. Most of us will probably continue to shout into the darkness and silence, while others remain and become 'celebrities.'

I've been puzzled- like many others- as to why certain blogs have gained so much attention. Were they the first to blog? Are the blogger's ideas more original or brilliant?, expressed in better writing?
I suspect that concurrence with the perspective of the GREAT MENTIONERS (great term!) does help, although it may not account for a very small # of well-publicized independent thinkers that do get attention.

As in other realms, success seems based on several unfair advantages- like family friends in powerful positions to help. Only the most aggressive and determined from among those WITHOUT connections, have even a slight chance of being noticed and read--regardless of how original or brilliant they may be.

The evolution of the blogosphere, sadly, may end up recapitulating the evolution of media- from pamphlets to print news and broadcast news, and from challenging to maintaining the status quo.

the original QUOTE:

"the politically oriented blogosphere had and has great promise, but has sadly failed to live up to it.

Several reasons I can see:
1. The Great Mentioners of the mass media elevate certain blogs and forums to greater visibility by MENTIONING them in the mass media. The ones that they mention are those that cleave unto the "conventional wisdom" , the Washington consensus. If not, such blogs are not mentioned, and those that do cleave are mentioned and gain visibility and money and consulting fees and so forth.

THey provide the model for the others to follow. Monkey see monkey do.

politcal blogs and forums that are mentioned are those that purge the posters and commentors who are ideological outriders. Thus the ideological hegemony is maintained."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]