Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Like a Girl

By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet. Posted January 10, 2006.


I just can't seem to act like a girl, even when I go on the Internet.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Some things never change. For example, I've hated iPods ever since I bought my first one a few years ago and suffered the irritating iTunes crash that destroyed $100 worth of music I'd bought online. Yet I continue to buy iPods. I also continue to use Microsoft Windows on a regular basis, despite the fact that it's a rotten proprietary operating system. Here's another thing that has never changed about me:

I just can't seem to act like a girl, even when I go on the Internet.

I know this because I just read the Pew Internet and American Life Project's latest study, which reports on how women and men use the Internet. It turns out, for example, that men are more likely than women to go online several times a day, to "have heard about the latest tech-related issues," and to use the Internet for pleasure reading. Women, however, are more likely than men to use the Internet for e-mail and what the report's author Deborah Fallows calls "nurturing their relationships."

Of the many puzzling findings in this study, one of the most inexplicable is that women's activities constitute "nurturing a relationship," whereas what men do online doesn't. In a section of the study that asserts that men engage in "more activities" than women online, Fallows uses as examples men's participation in Fantasy Baseball, fan clubs, chat rooms, and reputation-based Web sites like Slashdot.org. Why don't any of these things count as "nurturing a relationship"? All of them are social activities, even personal ones.

There are problems like this all over Pew's study, moments when you can tell its author wanted to place her findings within the context of prevailing gender stereotypes. One section describes men as being "more aggressive" in their use of the Internet because they describe themselves as looking for a wider variety of information online than women do, and because only 19 percent of men feel overwhelmed by information glut (as opposed to 24 percent of women). I'd hesitate to call seeking a wide variety of information "aggressive," just as I would hesitate to call women's greater enjoyment of e-mail "nurturing."

Despite its shortcomings, Fallows's research overwhelmingly shows that women and men tend to use the Internet just as often, and often for the same kinds of things. Women are even surpassing men in many areas: Women under 29 are more likely than men of that age to go online. Women of all ages are more likely to use online maps and file-sharing services than men are; they also play games and watch videos online more than men do.

However, when it comes to confidence in their prowess as users of the Internet and as computer experts, women do lag far behind. It's telling that one measure Fallows uses to determine that men are "more aggressive" online is not objective but rather subjective. Men simply feel more strongly that what they do online is effective than women do. "Significantly more men are confident in themselves as searchers and geeks," Fallows writes. They are also "more likely to try new gadgets and applications and software."

These findings are what I'd call the tragedy of gender. Normally I would protest vociferously upon reading a study that proclaims women are somehow less geeky than men or that they have less interest in technology. But these findings ring true in a way that's sad and chilling. What we're seeing here is a difference in the way men and women perceive themselves in the realm of technology. Women may be doing almost the same things that men are on the Internet, but they're more timid about proclaiming it. And this timidity ultimately leads to discouragement -- it prevents women from feeling like they're proficient enough with technology to try new gadgets; it stays their hands when they have the urge to open up their computers and tear them apart to find out what makes them go.

The good news is that all those younger women who are swarming online in greater numbers than men will teach their daughters and younger sisters that women are as technically adept as men. They may not believe they are geeks, but their behavior will say otherwise. Here's hoping the next generation learns by seeing what we do, instead of by what we say about ourselves.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Annalee Newitz is a surly media nerd whose superpower is the ability to kick men off her wireless network by using the power of her mind.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
the author is a stereotype
Posted by: lamar on Jan 10, 2006 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...moments when you can tell its author wanted to place her findings within the context of prevailing gender stereotypes." Bingo!

And maybe women know their limitations. Are there stats for calls to the IT department to fix problem caused when superman downloaded so much garbage it took three days to get his configuration back to normal? I mean, why not be fearless? Its a computer, for dog sake.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the author is a stereotype Posted by: timg98376
» RE: the author is a stereotype Posted by: chaoslegs
» RE: the author is a stereotype Posted by: Samantha Vimes
Why so few women in computer science?
Posted by: psstmom on Jan 10, 2006 4:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wanted: Female Computer-Science Students

Colleges work to attract and support women in technology majors

http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i19/19a03501.htm


Colloquy: The Computer Science Clubhouse

Thursday, January 12, 2006, at 1 p.m., U.S. Eastern time

The number of women who major in computer science is small and getting smaller. Are women simply less interested than men in the nuts and bolts of computers? Or do subtle social pressures and overt sexism steer them away from the field? What can be done to attract more women to computer science?

http://chronicle.com/colloquy/2006/01/womenintech/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I know what you mean...
Posted by: 092098jvm on Jan 11, 2006 7:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although I do find it easier to act like a girl on the internet than in person, since I'm 6'2" and 210lbs with a beard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I know what you mean... Posted by: zipper696
Interesting thing...
Posted by: carcinoid112 on Jan 11, 2006 8:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I run a forum that has a very wide-ranging membership, all ages, educational levels, technical ability levels--you name it we're diverse (except for our core issue). Two of my VERY techy geek type people that help me out when I need to understand something beyond my level (anything more than keyboard, trackball, screen, click) have very non-specifically gender identifiable screen names, and they're both women. They don't identify themselves as such, except in private communications, but they're women who can get in there and geek around with the guys bigger than life. I asked why, and their responses were the same. If you want to be taken seriously in a tech conversation, allow everyone to assume you're male. They've told me, but that's because they know i'm female, and I make no pretense about technical ability. They don't know about each other, because they've asked for my discretion in the issue. And they are both IT professionals.

That's got to make guys wonder...how many guys do you know on line that aren't really guys?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Interesting thing... Posted by: Arianna
I "nurture relationships" online...
Posted by: dirkster42 on Jan 11, 2006 10:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and I'm a guy.

Oh, but I'm gay, so does that count?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hi-tech, low-tech, boy-tech, girl-tech
Posted by: hagwind on Jan 12, 2006 8:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in an area that's part rural, part small town, part suburban. I know guys whose primary relationship (whether they're married or not) is to their tractor, or their motorcycle, or their pickup -- or their computer. As far as I can see, the difference is not much. I think you're overestimating the hi-tech aspect of all this. I've been online for about 12 years. I'm online several times a day, partly for work, partly for organizing and correspondence, partly for fun. I maintain a website and keep a pretty interesting bloggery. This does not require a degree in computer sciences or a huge disposable income.

I'm suspicious of generalizations but I'll venture this one anyway, partly for fun and partly because I can't help noticing that it's follow-the-herd generalizations that get you noticed by AlterNet's blog-watchers: Whatever the technology, women use it to keep the community alive; men use it to assure themselves that their d*x are still working.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]