Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Behind the Wall

By Chuleenan Svetvilas, AlterNet. Posted July 22, 2005.


Is the Israeli military's wall an anti-terrorist security fence or a land grab? A new documentary explores its impact on the people and the landscape.
Israeli Wall distant view
Israeli Wall distant view
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For the past three years, the Israeli government has been building a wall through the West Bank and around Jerusalem in order to, it claims, combat Palestinian terrorist attacks. But Palestinians and other critics say Israel is using the wall as a means to annex Palestinian territory. French-Israeli filmmaker Simone Bitton focuses on the impact of the wall's construction in her new documentary, titled simply, Wall.

The Israeli wall was initially approved by the Israeli Defense Cabinet in 2001. At that time, according to the Israeli Ministry of Defense (MOD), the "security fence" was intended "to prevent illegal entry into Israel through the seizure, interrogation and arrest of [terrorist and criminal] elements" and to be constructed in three separate areas for a total of 80 kilometers. However, the MOD determined that in order for the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and police to operate more effectively, "a contiguous obstacle" was necessary. That is what remains under construction today.

The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), which refers to the wall as the "anti-terrorist fence," says it will eventually be 720 kilometers or 480 miles long -- nine times the length of the original plan. Parts of it include huge concrete sections, electronic chain-link fences, razor wire, paved patrol roads, dirt roads, and ditches -- all of which are under constant surveillance by the Israeli army.

A number of international bodies have criticized the construction of the wall. Amnesty International said the majority of the wall is being built on Palestinian land, "separating farmers from their land and Palestinians from their places of work, health care facilities and other essential services." In 2003, U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said construction of the wall should cease. The following year, the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion that the wall was "contrary to international law" and that Israel should "cease forthwith the works of construction of the wall being built in the Occupied Palestinian Territory." Writer Noam Chomsky has called the wall a "land grab."




Israeli Wall



Meanwhile, the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs says that "the route of the fence has been determined on the basis of security needs and topographical considerations" and that it is a "temporary defensive measure, not a border." (For an Israeli map of the wall, visit the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the Ministry of Defense.)

But "wall" is an inadequate word to describe the immense barrier that Israel is constructing. It is also a contested word, as the Israeli government insists that the majority of the obstacle is a chain-link fence, not just the tall concrete blocks that have received media attention. Wall may not be an accurate word, but "fence" is too innocuous to describe what is under construction.

Simone Bitton's 100-minute-long documentary, Wall, takes a personal and contemplative look at the wall's effect so far on the people and the landscape. Born in Morocco to a Jewish family, Bitton has both French and Israeli citizenship and speaks several languages, including Arabic, French, and Hebrew. She decided to make the film after she saw a television news report in 2002, announcing the wall's construction.

"The very idea of a wall erected between Israelis and Palestinians tore me apart," recalls Bitton. "I had the feeling that I was being cut in half, that who I am was being denied -- an Arab Jew whose entire being is the site of a permanent dialogue."

She began scouting locations in 2003 and soon put together a crew for a four-week shoot, capturing different views of the wall in its various stages of construction and including details such as the artwork painted on several tall concrete sections -- Matisse-inspired dancers cavorting with doves, pastel landscapes and desert scenes, and colorful animals and figures similar to Keith Haring's outlined blocky style.

As Bitton filmed, locals often approached her to talk about the wall. "We've been suffering for three years now," says one man. "We need to live together, that's it. And leave our destiny to God." Another man says that he does not feel safe and that the wall is "a waste of money. Were the fence the solution, they'd have built it 50 years ago."

Bitton also interviewed General Amos Yaron of the Israeli Ministry of Defense, who describes the wall as Israel's greatest engineering achievement, using 500 pieces of equipment that move millions of cubic meters of earth every day at a cost of around $2 million per kilometer.

The presence of the wall is overwhelming, looming psychologically and physically throughout the film. Clearly, it is not a solution, but a terrible and disastrous barrier to peace, which is an underlying message in the film. One way Bitton tried to break through seemingly impenetrable boundaries was by not identifying whether she was filming on the Palestinian or the Israeli side of the wall or whether she was speaking to a Palestinian or an Israeli. She made this conscious decision because for her, Israel-Palestine is one country "inhabited by Jews and Arabs alike." In fact, she says, "Nothing touches me more, in life as in my film, than to mistake a Jew for an Arab or vice versa."

Bitton has directed more than 15 documentaries about the history and culture of Arab people, including Mahmoud Darwich: As the Land Is the Language, which focuses on the renowned Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwich. Wall, in Hebrew with English subtitles, has been screened in many festivals worldwide and makes its California premiere at the San Francisco Jewish Film Festival on July 23. Bitton spoke with AlterNet about filming difficulties and the people she interviewed for the film.

In your research for choosing locations, how did you decide where to go?

I just went all over looking for the wall and for the sites where it was under construction. There was very [little] information about the wall and that is still the case. You cannot know from the newspapers or from the official communications where exactly they are building it. All the maps are false and the projects change all the time.

I wanted to show how the landscape is destroyed by the wall and for this you need to find high places, special angles. It was very strange because while looking for the wall, I rediscovered the beauty of the place at the same moment it was being destroyed.




Israeli Wall




Did you need permission to film or was the press card enough?

You need the press card to pass the checkpoint but many times the press card is not enough. Sometimes I asked for permission and sometimes I didn't. In many places I filmed, I was not supposed to be there according to the law or all kinds of military regulations, which change every day. I just have to sneak in or out, which is how Palestinians mostly live for years now.

Did you have any trouble with the military at the checkpoints?

I wouldn't say so. It was not easy all the time. There were some moments of tension, which you can somehow feel in the film but nothing really serious. But that's because I'm an Israeli and a Jewish Israeli. Nobody will shoot at me.

A Palestianian colleague could not move in the territories even without a camera. I used my tribal privilege to make the film. It would be obscene to talk about my difficulty considering that Palestinians are not allowed to walk one kilometer from their home.

In one scene, you are talking to a Palestinian man working on the wall. You seemed angry that he was building the wall, pointing out the irony of the situation. But he's resigned to his position, which he sees as a decent paying job.

Because this is how it is. You said ironic. I would say it's tragic. Just for feeding their family they are obliged to build the wall against themselves. And this is not a new phenomenon. Long before the wall, for example, all the Israeli settlements in the occupied territories have all been built by Palestinian hands, and most of them on the land which has been expropriated from the villages from which these workers came.

They are building the settlements on their own land because they have to make a living. All these people used to be farmers and when their land is taken, they become workers. All they have is their hands.

The economic situation in the West Bank and in Gaza is such a catastrophe with all the checkpoints, the closures and everything, that the only way to make a living without humanitarian food distribution is working for Israeli settlements, walls, etc.

You also show people circumventing the wall, finding little places where they can climb over.

All the West Bank is full of people looking for the holes. There are fewer and fewer holes but they are obliged to. They are not crossing it to go to Israel. They are crossing it to go to the other side of their own village because the wall is in the middle of the land, in the middle of the villages. So they are just trying to find any holes to go on with crucial things in their lives, going to school, to hospital, to water their land, etc.




Israeli Wall
Filmmaker Simone Bitton.



Many of the Israelis that you interview seem quite ambivalent about the wall. But everyone seems to feel like it can't be stopped. Do you think that it will just continue?

It's continuing. New kilometers everyday, new walls everyday. What you are pointing out is a very general problem with the Israeli population, which is that every time you make a survey, there is a majority of the Israeli population who is in favor of dismantling the settlements, in favor of the Palestinian state, etc. But it doesn't happen. Many people didn't vote according to their ideas or maybe they don't have anybody to vote for because all the Israeli traditional political establishment is in favor of the occupation.

Do you feel that your documentary is a good reflection of the way people are feeling there?

I made it very clear in my film that this is a very personal and intimate look at things. I show the reality through my eyes, which I believe are well-informed eyes and thoughtful eyes. I think it's interesting for people to see this place through the eyes of somebody like me. I know this place very well and I love it. I know the people and I am part of them.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Chuleenan Svetvilas is a freelance writer who lives in Oakland, CA. Her writings on film have appeared in Dox, International Documentary, and Release Print magazines.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Shine the spotlight on Israel
Posted by: apodapa on Jul 22, 2005 3:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If only Americans knew - more about what Israeli Occupation really is then they would understand that the Iraq Occupation is in a large way a hateful extension of Israels aparthied policies.

Another great article is called " Sowing the Seeds of Facism"
link
http://antiwar.com/hacohen/?articleid=6497

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shine the spotlight on Israel Posted by: Samantha Vimes
Walls,walls,walls, all come tumbling down
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jul 22, 2005 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Walls seem to be the rage in countries foriegn policy in the last fifty years. Truth is walls say 'Stay out!','I'm better than you!','I'm scared to death of you!'I'm seperate from you!'
What a oad of Hornswaggle!!! The Isrealies learned nothing
from WW2 except that they seem to have the right to act like a bully. Totally ignoring the fact that the greed exercised by their wealthy at the time helped create the mess of their times. This very same greed is how America is now operating.
Our walls are water.But the effect is the same...isolation.
Truth is every living thing SHARES this planet.Not one life is more worthy than another. The Creator,by whatever name,
never intended for us to butcher everthng or everyone.The fences that were liad were all natural,mountains,rivers,lakes,
and seas.Anybody can find fault with any-one over anything.
True higher development is the ability to tolerate our diffrences,rejoice in our similies,and see both as a chance to
learn and grow from eachother. All of us are endowded with special gifts to share with eachother,stop sharing,walls go up.
When walls go up,we all loose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you not paying attention to Iraq?
Posted by: Sojourner on Jul 22, 2005 11:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you jump in the middle of someone else's war, don't be surprised if both sides hate you. Pay attention to the war we are involved in. It's no different in Israel than in Iraq. Pray to God that somehow we will be able to get out and learn to keep our nose out of others' wars.

Americans are dying in Iraq daily because there are no walls there yet, except for the Green Area. The latest news says the Kurds want a border here, the Shiites want one there, and the Sunnis want none. Those borders may well require walls. And, yes, walls become an excuse, like laws, to find holes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Comment about the documentary, not the issue
Posted by: JasonA on Jul 23, 2005 12:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seen at 2005 Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, Toronto.

This film was supposedly offering a balanced view of the security fence between Israel and the Palestinian Territories. To a degree it was, showing both Jews and Arabs who hated the wall, which separates people from their land, and from each other. However, the filmmaker neglected to interview anyone, other than a defense ministry spokesman, that supported the barrier's construction. There was talk about what the mega project has meant to people from different communities, the physical and philosophical fences placed between them, but no discussion about why it was necessary.

There weren't overt plans to steal land and cause undue hardships for no reason; the goals were to stop suicide bombings and protect Israelis. Although most of those interviewed were thoughtful and even poetic, the film was biased and provoked anger at the government. By some estimates, terrorist attacks are down by 90% in areas where the wall has been built, but you wouldn't know that from the documentary.

Add the terrible film editing, the directors and audience's disdain for pro-Israeli questions and comments, and this experience becomes forgettable. During the Q&A that followed, the director repeatedly stated she avoided any blood and guts. But why didn't she interview the survivors of suicide bombings? Certainly, their opinions about the wall's construction should count. And what of highway drivers being stoned, and who are now protected by the wall? We'll never know because no other proponents were interviewed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Usual Bias
Posted by: leftyjew on Jul 27, 2005 8:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The interviews for this film were very interesting, but the piece as a whole displays all the usual anti-Israel bias. Ultimately, the 'fence' issue comes down to one thing: walls, once built, can be torn down again; people, once killed by terrorists, are dead forever. I lost friends in two Jerusalem bombings: not soldiers, not "oppressors" of anyone, just bright, sweet grad students in Jewish Studies, blown to pieces without provocation. I feel for the Palestinians whose lives are inconvenienced by the fence, I really do, but not half as much as I feel for the family and friends of innocent folks who are studying or shopping or having lunch and get blown to bits. When the terrorists disarm, the fence comes down, I just can't see a problem with that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Usual Bias Posted by: nbtesq
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement