Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Air Jesus

By Mariah Blake, Columbia Journalism Review. Posted May 5, 2005.


Over the air and under the radar, Christian broadcasting has created an alternative universe of faith-based news.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It's the first Tuesday of April. In Washington, D.C., the magnolia trees are blooming, tourists crowd the sidewalk cafés, and Congress has just returned from its spring recess. CBN News has chosen this time to unveil its new and greatly expanded Washington bureau in the Dupont Circle area, where many major networks have their local headquarters; the three-story brick fortress that houses the Washington operations of CBS News is less than a block away.

CBN's new digs are abuzz with activity. The Republican Sen. Trent Lott came by for an interview earlier in the day, as did Jim Towey, who directs the White House office of faith-based initiatives. Now Lee Webb, the CBN anchor in from Virginia, sits behind the desk in one of the studios preparing to deliver the network's first half-hour nightly newscast from this gleaming set. Behind him is a floor-to-ceiling world map illuminated in violet and indigo and a screen emblazoned with CBN's logo. At his side, just beyond the camera's view, sits a squat pedestal that holds a battered American Standard Bible. Webb lowers his head and folds his hands. "Father, we are grateful for today's program," he says. "We pray for your blessing. We ask that what we're about to do will bring honor to you." Then the cameras roll.

To many people -- especially in blue-state America -- God, news, and politics may seem an odd cocktail. But it's this mix that fuels much of CBN's programming.

CBN's flagship program, the "700 Club" with Pat Robertson, is familiar to many Americans. But few outside the evangelical community know how large the network is -- it employs more than 1,000 people and has facilities in three U.S. cities as well as Ukraine, the Philippines, India, and Israel -- or how diverse its programming. And CBN, or Christian Broadcasting Network, is just one star in a vast and growing Christian media universe, which has sprung up largely under the mainstream's radar. Conservative evangelicals control at least six national television networks, each reaching tens of millions of homes, and virtually all of the nation's more than 2,000 religious radio stations. Thanks to Christian radio's rapid growth, religious stations now outnumber every other format except country music and news-talk. If they want to dwell solely in this alternative universe, believers can now choose to have only Christian programs piped into their homes. Sky Angel, one of the nation's three direct-broadcast satellite networks, carries 36 channels of Christian radio and television -- and nothing else.

As Christian broadcasting has grown, pulpit-based ministries have largely given way to a robust programming mix that includes music, movies, sitcoms, reality shows, and cartoons. But the largest constellation may be news and talk shows. Christian public affairs programming exploded after Sept. 11, and again in the run-up to the 2004 presidential election. And this growth shows no signs of flagging.

Evangelical news looks and sounds much like its secular counterpart, but it homes in on issues of concern to believers and filters events through a conservative lens. In some cases this simply means giving greater weight to the conservative side of the ledger than most media do. In other instances, it amounts to disguising a partisan agenda as news. Likewise, most guests on Christian political talk shows are drawn from a fixed pool of culture warriors and Republican politicians. Even those shows that focus on non-political topics -- such as finance, health, or family issues -- often weave in political messages. Many evangelical programs and networks are, in fact, linked to conservative Christian political or legal organizations, which use broadcasts to help generate funding and mobilize their base supporters, who are tuning in en masse. Ninety-six percent of evangelicals consume some form of Christian media each month, according to the Barna Research Group.

Given their content and their reach, it's likely that Christian broadcasters have helped drive phenomena that have recently confounded much of the public and the mainstream media -- including the surge in "value voters" and the drive to sustain Terri Schiavo's life, a story that was incubated in evangelical media three years before it hit the mainstream. Nor has evangelical media's influence escaped the notice of those who stroll the halls of power. They've been courted by the likes of Rupert Murdoch, Mel Gibson, and George W. Bush. All the while, they've remained hidden in plain sight -- a powerful but largely unnoticed force shaping American politics and culture.

***

Christians have been flocking to broadcasting ever since the first radio programs began crackling across the airwaves in the early 1900s. By the 1930s, evangelicals were lobbying for policies that would ensure their dominance in the religious broadcasting realm. Their activism was catalyzed by the fact that early on, the big-three networks donated rather than sold airtime to religious organizations. The Federal Council of Churches, which represented the more liberal mainline denominations, favored this system, which it believed would help keep the religious message from getting corrupted. But evangelicals worried that networks would lavish mainline churches with free airtime while giving their own ministries short shrift. In 1944, they formed the National Religious Broadcasters (NRB), and that organization lobbied federal regulators. The strategy worked; the government eventually decided to let religious organizations purchase as much airtime as they could afford. Evangelical preachers were soon flooding the airwaves, while mainline broadcast ministries all but vanished from the radio dial.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Mariah Blake is an assistant editor at CJR.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Fascinating, terrifying and sickening all at once...
Posted by: roloclark on May 5, 2005 5:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an evangelical Christian who does not live in the US, I found Mariah's article fascinating, terrifying and sickening all at once. It is breathtaking how easy it is to mingle religion and politics, and to not think critically about either. Watching him move into his second term, I still cannot understand how Mr Bush - and the enormous constituency he faithfully represents - can claim Christianity as the basis of their political philosophy while ignoring justice, mercy, humility, love, peace, kindness and self-control, all of which have a much longer history as Christian virtues than bigotry, racism, violence and hate.

That they do is undeniable, but what is most surprising is the fact that they do so very honestly, and with an amazingly clear conscience! One cannot accuse a Republican Christian of hypocrisy, because (s)he really believes that his/her actions are in line with authentic Christian doctrine, when in fact, nothing could be farther from the truth.

Mariah's article is important because it highlights one important way in which this deception can permeate peoples' lives so completely that they are unable to critically examine their own actions in light of their beliefs. "Christian broadcasting", when coupled with fundamentalist "Christian schools" do amazing damage when they pontificate on contemporary politics, claiming "thus saith the Lord" while pushing a button to destroy more innocent lives in the name of progress.

Learning a lesson from the mistakes of the Religious Right, perhaps we need to remember that anger is not the answer, but that we need to respond with compassion to our brothers and sisters who are so lost that they cannot find their way out of their own broadcasting networks. Congratulations Mariah on a meticulously researched, carefully written and well-argued article. May we read many more of this nature in the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If we don't stop them, no one will.
Posted by: ZylogZ80 on May 5, 2005 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How long can we go on acting like we can live beside these people? We are not a United States of America. I share no common culture with these delusional creeps who, so fervently, devout their adult lives to some insane fables. I believe in religious tolerance - but when I say tolerance I mean tolerance, not acceptance or advocacy. Would we afford champions of Hellenistic mythology equal opportunity and airtime on serious news programs? No, such a person would be a kook. Should we add followers of the Old Norse pantheon to our "panels of experts" when talking about war or women's rights? Should we include Christians, Muslims or Jews, of any stripe in these sorts of discourse? Hell no. This is a hard and scary enough world, with real problems, that we here in the real world can barely deal with. We don't need self-delusional immature fools who base their lives around a temperamental imaginary friend directing public discourse.

We need to stop acting like everyone's beliefs are equal, and that everyone deserves an equal voice. I wish that were true, and I wish humans had that sort of clarity of vision, but we don't. The biggest difference between the dogmatic fundamentally religious, and the secular or agnostic is simple. I can state my views and not claim they are absolute fact. I can say what I think and hear what you think, and if your point is better I can admit it - and thank you for the insight. Those who base their personal beliefs around what their preacher says their god wants cannot do this. If you disagree with them, you disagree with god, and if you disagree with god, you are wrong because he is infallible. See the problem with this?

These people constantly claim there is a cultural war in this country, and that secular-humanist lefties are out to silence their voice and remove them from public discourse. While we on the left are constantly trying to be more accommodating and understanding, actually saying such rubbish, as "Science and religion are two equally valid ways of looking at the world." I am done with this appeasement. Lets give them their culture war. Lets rip this country in two at the seams and see who stands. We're armed with facts, rationality, humanity and hope. They’re armed with megalomaniacal delusions and an ineffectual dead god. We'll see who stands and who falls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow.
Posted by: metavurt on May 5, 2005 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I grew up in a conservative church, Scofield Memorial in Dallas, Tx, I attended Moody Bible Institute later on (was released due to poor gpa, go figure) and what I find most fascinating is a nagging question in my mind about all these networks and channels dedicated to the Christian right: can we no longer be poor and Christian?? It seems to me that money is always closely connected to power, and power so very close to corruption. When I hear someone who I used to admire (J. Dobson) telling me that it's a sin to not vote, I wonder what has happened. Democracy didn't even exist in biblical times, so I can tell everyone for a fact, Jesus did not once say "Vote or you're in sin", and neither did God during His direct relationship with Israel.

Scary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wow. Posted by: jacklack
Don't worry!
Posted by: Iamnotafruittree on May 5, 2005 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Total and complete humiliation is on the horizon. Just wait and see what the christian right has really been up to. Be patient as fate is at work here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't worry! Posted by: dentree
» RE: Don't worry! Posted by: astarr
Wow
Posted by: Campesino on May 5, 2005 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"We need to stop acting like everyone's beliefs are equal, and that everyone deserves an equal voice."

Wow....and who is calling whom a fascist theocrat

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wow Posted by: ZylogZ80
» RE: Wow Posted by: Campesino
» RE: Wow Posted by: wonkywriter
» RE: Wow Posted by: Campesino
» RE: Wow Posted by: astarr
Bible
Posted by: liberal commies on May 5, 2005 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bible states to obey your government and the men God has allowed to be in charge even if it is not what you think is right and the government askes you to vote so technically you should vote. The bible is straight forward on everything it says...and that's how most cults get started. They way Christian radio is growing and striving is awesome but soome people may never know God's grace and salvation with out it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bible Posted by: mrtbg
» RE: Bible Posted by: astarr
» RE: Bible [Part 1] Posted by: David Baker
» RE: Bible [Part 2] Posted by: David Baker
also...
Posted by: liberal commies on May 5, 2005 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also they couldn't vote in the time under the Roman empire but they did have a census and Jesus and his family followed the law to travel back to their homeland to be counted, and all you have to do is go to the nearest church or school. Another, they didn't vote in Israel, God put who he wanted in charge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oh yeah...
Posted by: liberal commies on May 5, 2005 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't hate us for trying to save your soul. Christianity is the only religion that can't be disprove, if you don't believe me reseach yourself and find your own answer. Don't tolerate Christian if you think we're crazy, nothing is more weak than a person who tolerates everyone and doesn't know what they believe in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» oh yeah, right back Posted by: thirdmg
» RE: oh yeah... Posted by: liberal socialist
» RE: oh yeah... Posted by: astarr
» RE: oh yeah... Posted by: Justwayne
» RE: oh yeah... Posted by: FutureVizions
Fundamental regressions
Posted by: Meta4Life on May 5, 2005 12:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is good, very good. We need more of this kind of thorough, detailed reporting on all media corporations, IMO, but especially on those which use regressionist tendencies to support a fundamentalist (dare I say "dominionist") agenda.

Take a look at Regression, and the Politics of Fear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fundamental regressions Posted by: astarr
In the beginning was the Worse (word)
Posted by: Meremark on May 5, 2005 1:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
-
A snappy semantic quibble here, for just a minute.
The main major problem with the religiosity-sodden type of brain, (and, yes, I do believe it is largely congenital, in the genes, from the parents, same as many other mental conditions), and a significant basis for the asocial behavior (sometimes anit-social) of these types in secular everyday affairs, is noticeable and often in word departures. They carry their own sense, or meaning, of words, significantly different from the usage of (those) words in the vernacular, in consensus usage. (That there are specific areas of the human brain dedicated to word cognition -- which process must properly 'abstract' word virtuality by, for, and from object veritability -- readily admits that different people's linguistic anatomy can be built differently, just as height and bone development and color of eyes are all built differently in each of us.)
This idea that word weirdness and religiosity are correlated in brain structure is not an allegation limited to these evangelical beanbrains Robertson and Dobson and Falwell have cooked up; there can be evidence seen in many 'enlightened' figures in many 'religions' around the world and throughout time. (But which one has reserved it a special status named "talking in tongues" -- is that the evangelicals? I don't know.)

And all of that is maybe too much for my simple dispute with the headline's use of the phrase 'alternate universe.'
Firstly, I think that those two words together is a contradiction. Mostly, though, I wanted to propose the phrase 'alternate perverse.'

Because 'perverse' would mean (to me) the version or word of one, whereas I use 'universe' to mean the one version or word.

I see the religious-afflicted as difficult to accommodate mainly because they 'think' their 'word of one' -- perversion, is always the 'one word' -- universal.
-

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Far Should Tolerance Go?
Posted by: thirdmg on May 5, 2005 5:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's obvious that a high degree of tolerance must be accepted in any truly democratic society, especially in a multicultural one like ours. But how far should tolerance go in accepting those who are openly dedicated to imposing their intolerance on others, and who are reaching a critical mass of power to do so? For decades, volumes have been written exposing the true nature of the religious right and its theocratic goals of ruling America under a narrow and rigid interpretation of biblical values. The literature consistently points out that the religious right has openly declared war on the rest of us, and that we need to fight back if we hope to win the war. During those same decades, however, many political and religious commentators tried to dismiss the fears by claiming, in effect, that "it can't happen here."

Well, in this most religious of all western industrial nations, it can. And, unfortunately, under the current faith-based presidency and Congress, as well as the serious threats to an independent judiciary, it's looking more and more like it actually is happening here. Moreover, the right's strategy of hiding behind religion and absolutist morality has become an effective shield against any kind of serious criticism or opposition in the mainstream media. Our tolerance of the right's intolerance looks more and more like blind appeasement. And, more and more, it looks like our tolerance is being used against us as leverage for destroying the freedoms secular democracy guarantees.

If the religious right wins the war, it will not feel any obligation to be broadminded or fair in the exercise of power. We've already seen clear signs of that in Washington, DC.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What you see is what you get
Posted by: fferris on May 5, 2005 10:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If nobody went to Wallmart, the chain would fail. If nobody listened to religious broadcasting, or contributed money, it would fail. We're looking at a phenomenon that can't be destroyed or wished away -- it prevails. Such is humanity: the credulous, the skeptical.

I can't dismiss this phenomenon, try as I might. All these networks exploit the vulnerable minds of millions of human beings. Or if you will, they cater to people inclined to view the world through this patriarchal, authoritarian lens. A great many of our species is of this type. They want a certain ultimate outcome, just as I do. They want Christ to return and take them to heaven. I want the Earth to prevail as a healthy habitat for future generations of all creatures.

What we'll get remains to be seen, but in our lifetimes all we can rightly do is be aware and clear about what we want. And know that it's a big, ungainly world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Baby and the Bath Water
Posted by: nakis on May 6, 2005 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a lot of Christian broadcasting that is not about money and power. It's about people. As there are many Christians that are about people not money and power. I am not saying anyone hear is stating one way or the other. As always in life nothing is all black or all white. Unfortunately the path of these evangelists are ones of pain and suffering. Aside from my belief that they have the message wrong (following Paulist (questionable authorship) instead of Jesus's teachings) they are in a complete bubble about the intent of the creation of the USofA. People in their highest eschelons are lying to them and they are believing it even after the lies have been outed. I can't tell you how many times I've read about the lies of fundamentalist Christian historians being found out, confessing to the lies and then hear Christians passing it around as truth. The damage is done. They sacrifice truth for faith and power.
And this is not necessary for them to believe in. All they have to do is leave politics alone. Leave the laws secular. Leave the faith up to the individual. That's all our founding fathers asked of this great experiment. They deconstructed the church states shortly after our independence to free the people from having to follow other peoples faith. Trying to make Christian laws or a Christian nation is just another form of oppression. A Christian taliban.
And these people like Robertson are fundamentally demented. Power corrupts. Invariably. It is the nature of power to change minds.
Christian radio/broadcasting in of itself is not bad. But the message they spread in much of these broadcasts is heartbreaking. God gave everyone free will. To think that after doing that God requires everyone to think only down on thin line is demented. Have your faith. Ask others to follow it. But you cannot demand it or force it. Or you've crossed that line. And if you violate the words and beliefs you claim to want everyone else to follow you've lost it.
America is for all faiths. Freedom of religion. And even if can quote words, sayings, etc. of some of the people who lived in the time of the start of our nation, you've still missed the point. Freedom of religion is freedom from tyrrany of religion. Not freedom to inflict your religion as people like judge Moore believe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Baby and the Bath Water Posted by: astarr
bklyngirl
Posted by: bklyngirl on May 6, 2005 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The line between church and state is becoming dangerously blurry. The last time we mixed the two people were burned at the stake.
There is nothing wrong with being a Christian. I am a Christian myself. The problem is the "sheeple" mentality, when people stop thinking for themselves and allow others to do their thinking for them. Remember what the Bible says about false prophets. I doubt they'll come as unappealing leftist liberals, so Christians beware, there may be a false prophet or two among you, and he may come across the airwaves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al Blazo
Posted by: alblazo on May 7, 2005 3:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article "Air Jesus" is an exceptionally well-done piece, one which I'll share with many.

I'd like, however, to point out an observation made by the author that is somewhat lacking in clarity. On page one paragraph four, Ms. Blake makes the following statement: "Thanks to Christian radio's rapid growth, religious stations now outnumber every other format except country music and news-talk." Unfortunately this is true. Few people realize that the Christian TBN juggernaut (Trinity Broadcasting Network) is the largest and most powerful broadcasting network in the world.

However, as a lover of country music (for at least the past two decades) and ardent anti-religionist (for all of my adolescent and adult life), I can attest to a strong wave of religiosity that has been creeping into country music and the programming of country-western music stations for quite some time. A C&W station the I frequently listen to from the Grove City, PA area (FM 95.1, "Froggy") is a classic case in point. This station will play at least two or three "Christian C&W" tunes every half hour - the same ones, over and over! Most of it's listeners don't even realize what's happening to them. They're still humming along to popular songs like "The Way We Were" and "Let's get a Little Mud on the Tire" long after they've ended when, before you know it, Froggy's introduced it's listeners to "Drugs or Jesus" for the umpteenth time. This tune has a real melancholic but hummy feel to it and listeners naturally continue just humming along, unknowing that they've just plunged, head-on, into mindless religiosity. Fuse this with tunes that carry a message laced with a heavy dose American patriotism, songs like "God Bless the USA," and the listener is hit with a double whammy. These characters are doing it all day long. They're engaged in brainwashing the brainwashed while at the same time picking up stragglers here and there every hour or so. It's clear to me that few will ever escape from this onslaught unscathed.

Country and Western audiences are a natural for the religionists. The vast majority are theists and since the age of two have internalized nothing but positive images of all things Christian. They're perfect targets for the new sectarian revolution.

Praise the Lord! Pass the lions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmm...
Posted by: philosopherintraining on May 12, 2005 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it bad that, despite the fact that I have been a proud christian for several years, this article scares me? I've always been afraid of worldwide power-holders, and what they can do. The fact that Christianity has broadcasting capabilities scares me, because when a faith has the ability to spread it's dogma without making people move from their idiot-boxes, people who are easily manipulated in their vegetative state, that's when brainwashing occurs. I'm not saying that would happen, but going to church to hear the Word is an act of participating, an alien concept, apparently. I guess what I'm afraid of is the fact that I don't want to hear secular events glossed over with religious tones. Yeah, the news is upsetting, but I don't want to be insulated from the fact that it's a hard world today. I daresay that listening to news broadcast by the Christian community would be to accept having your truth translated for you. Sound hypocritical, but the world has it's truth, and the Bible, has it's truth. Those truths shouldn't mix.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Salem News Network, The worst of the worst
Posted by: nittacci on May 21, 2005 2:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article really strikes home. I've recently been writing about the Salem Radio Network, an ultra-right, fanatic religious talk radio network that's been buying up stations in America at an alarming rate. They're trying to become another Clear Channel, but they make Clear Channel almost look liberal. There are many small towns that ONLY get Salem Network stations. They've got national hosts, like Michael Medved, Michael Savage, Bill Bennett, Laura Ingraham. All with a synchronized message of hate.
Check them out:
Lives of the Saints, a blog
I'd appreciate any comments or critique of this new blog. Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's worse than you think
Posted by: newsguy777 on Jan 24, 2006 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are reports of 50 boys and girls leaving Islam for Christianity. Millions of Christians in China and some have a focus on witnessing to everybody from China to Jerusalem. South Korea also is loaded with Christianity. The new Christianity is conservative coming from Asia, Africa, and South America. Look on the internet, and you will find Muslims seeing visions and turning to Christianity. All this to say the reach of Christianity is worldwide with the West being a tiny portion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]