Free Speech Impediment
Also in Media and Technology
Relentless Pressure from Progressive Groups Pushes Hatemonger Lou Dobbs Out of CNN
Tana Ganeva
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert
Feds Wanted Private Data on All Visitors to Liberal News Site
Daniel Tencer
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames
For Glenn Beck, SEIU Is 'Radical, Marxist,' Except When Its Nurses Treat Him for Emergency Abdominal Pains
Alexander Zaitchik
Many Still Believe That Saddam Hussein Was Behind 9/11, and Now We Have Some Idea Why
Emily Badger
To read the original and revised scripts, go here.
David E. Kelley – the Emmy Award-winning creator of such memorable series' as Picket Fences, Doogie Howser M.D., Ally McBeal, Boston Public, The Practice, and its current spin-off, Boston Legal – is probably the most prolific and successful writer/producer now working in television. Coupled with the fact that he is married to film star Michelle Pfeiffer, Kelleys talent makes him one of the most influential people in the entertainment world. But apparently even Kelleys power pales before the might of Disney and the MausHaus.
Case in point: the next episode of Boston Legal, to be broadcast Sunday March 13 on the Disney-owned ABC network. AlterNet has acquired both the original and the revised script for this episode from a source who prefers to remain anonymous. The original penned by Kelley focused in large measure on Fox News and its loofah-loving star Bill O'Reilly. The script also featured substantial excerpts from the independent film Outfoxed, which documents how the allegedly "fair and balanced" cable channel acts as a propaganda arm for the Republican Party and other conservative interest groups.
But the final script – the one that was actually shot for the show that will appear on Sunday – has been thoroughly scrubbed on orders from top ABC network executives, and all mention of Fox News and OReilly has been sent down the Memory Hole.
Why was the original script, which ironically centered on issues of free speech, censored?
Kelley wont say why the changes were made and no one at his production company, his producing partner 20th Century Fox, ABC or even Fox News is talking.
But a comparison of the original script and the censored script speaks for itself. In the original, Chi McBride (principal of the high school featured in Kelleys previous hit Boston Public) installs a "Fox Blocker" on every television set in his school, on the entirely reasonable grounds that what appears on Fox News is not news but in fact "hate speech." One of his students, Stuart Milch, believes McBrides decision to be censorship, and takes his case to the attorneys of Boston Legal.
Heres a taste of what millions of viewers will now miss next Sunday:
Stuart: "Its called a Fox Blocker. Sold off the internet. You attach it to the coaxial cable on your television and it basically blocks out all Fox News transmissions My high school principal attached these liberal, left-wing devices to all the televisions in the building. Meanwhile, the kids are free to watch CBS, CNN, NBC, even ABC, But not Fox. Its censorship."Its called censorship, all right just not on Boston Legal anymore. Heres what the final, scrubbed-and-censored script says instead:
Stuart: "Its called a news blocker. Sold off the internet. You attach it to the coaxial cable on your television and it basically blocks out news transmission . My high school principal attached these devices to all the televisions in the building. The problem is turns out it only blocks out one network, the most fair and balanced one. All the others, kids can watch."Heres another example, this time of an interchange between two Boston Legal characters attorney Chelina Hall and Catherine Piper, secretary to attorney Alan Shore (played by Boston Legal star, James Spader.) Again, original script first:
Chelina: If you had to watch the news, Mrs. Piper, which network would you go to?
Catherine (simply): Fox, of course.
Chelina: Can you tell us why?
Catherine: Well. For starters, were winning the war on Fox. The economys better there. And Brit Hume. Sometimes I close my eyes and go to him.And now, the censored version:
Chelina: If you had to watch the news, Mrs. Piper, which network would you go to?
Catherine (simply): I dont know. Id probably seek out the station where were most likely to be winning the war. Where I can find a better economy. Maybe some weapons of mass destruction.And so it continues, page after expurgated page. No Fox. No Bill OReilly. No Brit Hume. And no free speech?
This and other articles by Rory O'Connor are available on his blog.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »
| More News and Analysis: | ||
|
Relentless Pressure from Progressive Groups Pushes Hatemonger Lou Dobbs Out of CNN Media and Technology: Groups like BastaDobbs have done in Dobbs, who used his media platform to stir up racist, anti-immigrant hysteria for years. By Tana Ganeva, AlterNet. November 12, 2009. |
Two More Legal Residents Caught in the Maw of our Immigration-Security-State Immigration: Opponents of reform say the system's fine as it is ... are they serious? By Seth Hoy, Immigration Impact. November 12, 2009. |
Muslim-Americans Have Good Reason to Fear Fort Hood Backlash Rights and Liberties: Though anti-Muslim hysteria has leveled off somewhat since September 11, Muslims still routinely get the blame for anything that even remotely smacks of a terrorist act. By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media. November 12, 2009. |
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.