Let's Talk @!#?%!# Politics

By Omayra Zaragoza Cruz, PopMatters. Posted October 12, 2004.

Over and above demonstrations and political rallies, major industry award ceremonies like the Grammys and the Oscars have become favored venues for entertainers who exercise their celebrity to advance political commentary. Well-known practitioners include Susan Sarandon, Bono and, of course, Michael Moore, though many more entertainers make a point of speaking on behalf of peace, human rights, civil liberties and social justice. For me, several celebrity speeches stand out as especially edgy and public responses to them say quite a bit about how we handle the lusty affair between politics and entertainment. (We all know they've been sleeping together even if, as with so many illicit pleasures, we choose not to talk about it.)

Recall, for example, Halle Berry's decision to use the acceptance speech for her 2002 Best Actress award to comment on the history of racial discrimination that marks Hollywood. Berry's impassioned speech insisted: "This moment is so much bigger than me. This moment is for Dorothy Dandridge, Lena Horne, Diahann Carroll. It's for the women that stand beside me, Jada Pinkett, Angela Bassett, Vivica Fox. And it's for every nameless, faceless woman of color that now has a chance because this door tonight has been opened. Thank you. I'm so honored. I'm so honored. And I thank the Academy for choosing me to be the vessel for which His blessing might flow. Thank you." Berry's invocation of the gendered and racial politics of invisibility that impact women of color, was later compared to Denzel Washington's comparably demure and decidedly "apolitical" acceptance speech for Best Actor with a regularity that did more to prove how prominent racial issues remain in Hollywood, than her candid discussion of the subject.

At last year's Academy Awards, while introducing a song from "Frida" (2002), Mexican actor Gael Garcia Bernal commented on both U.S. foreign policy and his relationship to the very institution within which he had been positioned as a presenter. In a ContactMusic.com article entitled "Bernal's Oscar Rebellion," the actor notes that although he was honored to be chosen as a presenter, he "was also horrified at the clichéd, patronizing script the Academy wanted him to read; especially considering his stance on the U.S.' imminent war against Iraq" (Oct. 2, 2003). Bernal read from Frida Kahlo's diary as instructed. He then calmly added that if the subject of the film were alive "she would be on our side, against the war." Cynical about the efficacy of his "rebellion," Bernal later joked that his comment likely only served to make the Hollywood elite aware that he spoke English.

More recently, comedian George Lopez shot a playful jab at George W. Bush while hosting this year's Latin Grammys. Testing the rumor that the president understands a little Spanish, Lopez issued a directive: " !Ya no mames wey! " Lopez also offered a translation for non-Spanish speakers: "I said, 'good luck in your future endeavors.'" News commentary on the joke purposely mistranslates, providing "polite" versions of the quip like: "Stop lying, you jerk!" and "Don't lie to me," as well as the truly vague, "Cut it out, jerk." So far as I can gather, this Mexican colloquialism demands, "Stop messing around already, jackass!" Though there's also some sucking inference to the phrase, and definitely an unseemly reference that has something to do with farm animals.

Various responses answer the type of political remarks that I have recounted. Some applaud, like audience members at the Latin Grammys who signaled their approval of Lopez with a roar of cheers and laughter. Some grumble, raising arguments that generally revolve around two themes: the (misguided) perception that "the media" is liberal/progressive/radical, and the conviction that entertainment and politics should not mix. Others have the power to silence.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »