Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Stepford Wife: You've Come the Wrong Way, Baby

By Lakshmi Chaudhry, AlterNet. Posted June 18, 2004.


The cookie-baking zombie reflects the desire of the new anti-feminists to return to a happier time when wives knew their place and were content within it.
Stepford Wives
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Spoiler Alert: The following article reveals details of the movie's plot, including its conclusion.

The highly anticipated remake of The Stepford Wives arrived in theaters on the heels of deafening hype only to sink rapidly into cultural irrelevance over the space of a weekend.

The movie was preceded by a high-brow media debate over the state of feminism and fashion. Maureen Dowd, for example, weighed in on its significance a full year before its release. Her verdict: "But the real chiller is that the evil husbands in the original did not need to murder. They just needed to wait. In the long interval between the two movies, women have turned themselves into Stepford wives."

Dowd's judgment, as it turns out, is also the consensus of the cultural intelligentsia, whose various members have weighed in over the past couple of weeks, pointing to the favored signs of feminine malaise: botox, plastic surgery, reality shows, and so on.

No wonder there was little to say once the movie was finally released. (It has barely warranted a mention other than the obligatory review since its unveiling.) Why bother with the execution when the very premise is sufficient excuse to air predigested ideas about gender relations.

This isn't to say that Stepford Wives, Take Two, isn't addled, inane and uninspiring. But it is all these things for a good reason, i.e. its staunch refusal to address the central idea that inspired the original. Far beyond the nip-and-tuck culture of present-day femininity, it reveals how the F-word, feminism, has over the course of 30 years become the great unmentionable -- so much so that the remake of a movie structured wholly around the battle of the sexes must work so hard to elide it entirely.

What Battle of the Sexes?

According to its creators, the script was "updated" to suit our modern sensibility by recasting the original Stepford women as high-powered executives. Nicole Kidman, the new Joanna Eberhart, is no wannabe photographer dabbling in Betty Freidan, but a well-coiffed, tough-as-nails president of a major television network. The men now have every reason to feel cowed and overwhelmed by these alpha females who are a '70s male nightmare come true.

The movie sets up a modern-day gender war, however, only to backpedal strenuously from its own plotline over the next two hours. The central premise is in trouble almost from the first scene when Joanna strides on to the stage to unveil her new brainchild -- a crass reality show -- to her white-collared troops. Her plastic smile, corporate sloganeering, and almost robotic enthusiasm have the unfortunate effect of making the transformation that looms ahead seem more a matter of changing the props than robbing her soul. Stepford executive, Stepford wife; same difference.

Then there is the 'butch' lawyer plotting to replace his flamboyantly 'femme' mate. The yuppie gay couple has the effect, intended or otherwise, of changing the terrain of engagement from gender roles to consumerism -- a point further reinforced by one of the movie's trailers that spoofs luxury car commercials. The desire for the perfectly acquiescent mate in the remake is no longer about male anxiety. It's just that we all want a Stepford wife now, a spouse perfectly engineered to meet our every need. That's exactly what Mike Wellington (Christopher Walken), the head of the Men's Association, tells Joanna: "You're just angry because you didn't think of it first!"

As it turns out, the women did think of it first. The movie's final coup de grace is the revelation that the mastermind behind the plot to replace independent, ambitious women with docile zombies is Mike's wife, Claire Wellington (Glenn Close). The true villain of 21st century Stepford is not an insecure, vengeful man, but a betrayed wife.

The movie's ambivalence toward the thorny business of gender relations is evident not just in its script but also in the publicity that heralded its arrival.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Lakshmi Chaudhry is senior editor of Alternet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »

How to Make Marriage More Than an Arrangement of Love-less, Sexless, Domestic Drudgery
Sex and Relationships: Marriage was designed way back when life expectancy was a couple of decades. Now we're living four times that long.
By Vanessa Richmond, The Tyee. July 10, 2009.
Does a Senior Obama Official Have Unseemly Ties to Notorious Human Rights Abuser Chevron?
World: The story of this slick oil company's romance with the government has recently taken a crude twist.
By Jeremy Scahill, AlterNet. July 10, 2009.
What Kind of "Hope" Is Obama Offering to Latin American Countries Still Traumatized by U.S. Empire?
World: Throughout the Americas, there exists a powerful political tradition in which esperanza (hope) is defined by the fight against U.S. domination.
By Roberto Lovato, AlterNet. July 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Advertisement