COMMENTS: 215
Wall Street's 10 Greatest Lies of 2009
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.
On December 13, President Obama declared that he was not elected to help the “fat cats." But the cats got another version of that memo. A day later, 10 of them were supposed to partake in some White House face-time to talk about their responsibilities to the rest of the country, but only seven could make it. No-shows for the "very serious discussion" -- due to inclement New York weather or being too busy with internal bonus discussions to bother with the President -- were Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, Morgan Stanley CEO John Mack and Citigroup Chairman Richard Parsons.
Yes, Obama inherited a big financial mess from the Bush administration – which inherited its set-up from the Clinton administration (financial recklessness, it turns out, is non-partisan) -- but he and his appointees have spent the year talking about fighting risk and excess on Wall Street, while both have grown.
Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner patted himself on the back for making the "difficult and necessary” decisions of fronting Wall Street boatloads of money to cover its losses and capital crunch last fall. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke (a Bush-Obama favorite) was named Time Magazine’s Person of the Year for saving the free world as we know it. And Congress is talking "sweeping reform" about a bill that leaves the banking landscape intact, save for some minor alterations. For starters, it doesn’t resurrect the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, which separated risk-taking (once non-government-backed) investment banks from consumer oriented (government-supported) commercial banks.
Meanwhile, Wall Street is restructuring (the financial equivalent of re-gifting) old toxic assets into new ones, finding fresh ways to profit from credit derivatives trading, and paying itself record bonuses -- on our dime. Despite recent TARP payback enthusiasm, the industry still floats on trillions of dollars of non-TARP subsidies and certain players wouldn’t even exist today without our help.
Wall Street’s return to robustness and Main Street’s continued deterioration are the main takeaways for 2009 that stemmed from the 2008 choices to flush the financial system with capital and leave the real economy to fend for itself. Lies that exacerbate this divide only perpetuate its growth. With that, here is my top 10 list of lies. Please consider adding your own, and let’s all hope for a more honest New Year.
1) The economy has improved.
Earlier this month, Bernanke declared, “Having faced the most serious financial crisis and the worst recession since the Great Depression, our economy has made important progress during the past year. Although the economic stress faced by many families and businesses remains intense, with job openings scarce and credit still hard to come by, the financial system and the economy have moved back from the brink of collapse."
Sure, the economy is better -- if you work at Goldman Sachs or had an affair with Tiger Woods. But while Bernanke, former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Geithner turned the Federal Reserve into a national hedge fund (cheap money backing toxic assets in secrecy), and the Treasury Department into a bank insurance policy, the rest of the real economy took hit after hit -- starting with jobs.
The national unemployment rate remains at double digits. Despite Washington’s bizarre euphoria about unemployment rates last month being better (they edged down in November to 10 percent from 10.2 percent in October), the number of Americans filing for initial unemployment insurance rose during the second week of December. After all the temporary holiday hires, that number will probably increase again. Plus, unemployment rates in 372 metropolitan areas are higher than they were last year.
2) If you give banks capital, they will lend it out.
On Jan. 13, 2009 Bernanke concluded that "More capital injections and guarantees may become necessary to ensure stability and the normalization of credit markets.” He said that "Our economic system is critically dependent on the free flow of credit." He was referring to the big banks. Not the little people.
Ten months later, though, he admitted that, "Access to credit remains strained for borrowers who are particularly dependent on banks, such as households and small businesses” and that “bank lending has contracted sharply this year."
In other words, big banks don’t share their good fortunes. Shocking. And as a result, bankruptcies are rapidly rising for businesses and individuals – a direct result of lack of credit coupled with other economic hardships like job losses.
Total bankruptcy filings for the first nine months of 2009 were up 35 percent to 1,100,035 vs. the same period in 2008. The number of business bankruptcies during the first three quarters of 2009 eclipsed all of 2008. Individual consumer filings totaled 373,308 during the third quarter of 2009 and were up 33 percent vs. the same period of 2008. Tell those people about the free flow of credit, Ben.
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmckinl on Dec 28, 2009 12:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And Nomi points out the biggest problem ... the financial crisis is not over. We are only half way through the Housing Implosion, the Commercial Real Estate implosion is just beginning and tens of trillions of derivatives are hidden on the bank's books thanks to "loosened" accounting standards.
We are just one economic dislocation from a far bigger crisis and there are plenty of pot holes and black ice down the road. The Fat Lady is only half way through this ditty ...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Comment reported. Off-topic SPAM. n/m
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: xcellent Piece By Nomi Prins ...
Posted by: Douglas_Wilson
» RE: xcellent Piece By Nomi Prins ...
Posted by: off-the-radar 2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Dec 28, 2009 12:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They drive the getaway car and its painted to distract, deflect, distort and deceive.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Comment reported. Off-topic SPAM. n/m
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GuitarBill on Dec 28, 2009 10:27 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: solo guitarist
Posted by: goodday
Comments are closed-
Posted by: grkjr on Dec 28, 2009 1:59 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: business as usual
Posted by: Birdland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Arouete on Dec 28, 2009 2:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well you really need to do some homework. Read "The Man Who Sold the World." But the real mess began with J. Carter and interest rates. See Howard Zinn. Almost every scholar who has addressed this mess agrees this is a product of Reagan 'voodoo (supply side) economics."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Do some homework ... Reagan Started It but ...
Posted by: mmckinl
» RE: Do some more homework ... Reagan ran with what Nixon began,...
Posted by: gazooks
» RE: Do some homework ... Reagan Started It but ...
Posted by: Birdland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Dec 28, 2009 2:28 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone says this, but it makes absolutely no sense.
The economy went completely differently under Clinton than it did under Reagan, Bush I, Bush II, or Obama. This is incontrovertible fact.
Clinton inherited the biggest deficit in U.S. history from Bush II and turned it into the biggest surplus, which Bush II quickly piddled away. Incomes rose at all levels, and we enjoyed the longest sustained economic boom in history.
And yet progressives keep saying there's no difference. I assume these are the same people who fell for Obama. ;)
Also, Clinton did not steal the primary, hand trillions over to the banksters, or expand fascist policies. But never mind...
Video: a look inside Obama's Brain
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Clinton was different than these other guys
Posted by: mmckinl
» Can you tell me who appointed Alan Greenspan to the Fed?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Ronald Reagan appointed Greenspan but Clinton and Bush kept him.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» The question was not directed to you, @$$hole.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» At least I answered it correctly and solved your Clinton annoyance problem.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» When did I claim to be "upset about Clinton getting criticized"?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Re: This is a public forum, not a private one. We all have a right to answer just like you do.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» So now you're a mind reader?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» It doesn't take a mind reader as your posts show who you are.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» I have to hand it to you, Max, because you bring new meaning to the term "Sharp as a marble".
Posted by: GuitarBill
» You couldn't get my name right and you nothing about what you are talking about.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» I'm shakin' in my boots. Here comment again so you can get the last word in.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Good thing I waited for Joshua Holland to get back at you.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» GuitarBill: LIAR, Cyber Bully...
Posted by: photon's feather
» Really? No kidding? Asking a question makes me a "Cyber Bully".
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Trying to wriggle out of something?
Posted by: photon's feather
» Yes, and you're still a liar, Nader republican.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Liar! You told Joshua Holland. Once again:
Posted by: photon's feather
» I don't see the word "promise". Show me where I said "I promise"?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» More lies and obfuscation. Worthy of a 5-year-old.
Posted by: photon's feather
» I didn't give you my word, liar. And I notice that you can't produce the word "promise".
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Trying to sound like George W. Bush, aren't you GuitarBill?
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» So, according to the great GuitarBill...
Posted by: photon's feather
» Are you suffering from a head injury, Nader Republican?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Mind-reader Bill claims to know how I voted.
Posted by: photon's feather
» Okay genius, then perhaps you'll explain why
Posted by: GuitarBill
» If third parties are that small to you, then why do you act like they're big?
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Are you really that dense, Nader Republican?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Are you really that dense, Nader Republican?
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Here's something you should all agree on
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Here's something you should all agree on
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» RE: Here's something you should all agree on
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Here's something you should all agree on
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» RE: Here's something you should all agree on
Posted by: photon's feather
» Pitiful? That's your middle name.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Still lying - and still havering.
Posted by: photon's feather
» Prove it? No problem, punk.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Non sequitur.
Posted by: photon's feather
» Why should I respond to a lying Nader Republican, punk?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» You always respond so you answered your own question.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Non sequitur. Didn't like the response?
Posted by: photon's feather
» Lying again, punk?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Why shouldn't he come back?
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Actually, I owe you an apology, Joshua.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» No need
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Guitarbill owes each and everyone on this forum an apology.
Posted by: LStinson1988
» Why should I apologize to a pack of underhanded Nader Republicans?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» That means everyone is a Nader Republican to you. I'd like to see what Joshua has to say about you.
Posted by: LStinson1988
» Leave me outta this one ....
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Leave me outta this one ....
Posted by: LStinson1988
» RE: Why shouldn't he come back?
Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: Why shouldn't he come back? P.S.
Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: Why shouldn't he come back? P.S.
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Why shouldn't he come back? P.S.
Posted by: photon's feather
» Typical Republican--accuse others of that which you are guilty.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» You're not only a liar,...
Posted by: photon's feather
» Liar? The only liar here is you, Nader republican.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Keep talking to yourself GuitarBullshit.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Michael Steele loves you, Max.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Actually, Michael Steele loves you, Guitarbill because you're helping Obama lose.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Yeah, the entire World rests on my opinion. Are you familiar with the word hyperbole?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Liar? The only liar here is you, Nader republican. And that's the first lie..
Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: Why shouldn't he come back? P.S.
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Why shouldn't he come back? P.S.
Posted by: photon's feather
» Definitely!
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Funny ! Alternet bans Prophit for no reason but keeps obnoxious trolls like Guitarbill !
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» RE: Why shouldn't he come back?
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Joshua, check it out! David Ray Grifter's fact checker, Christopher Bollyn, is posting to AlterNet.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Quist, myself, and others have reported Guitarbill's obnoxious comments so many times this year.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Dignity? That's a laugh.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Dignity? That's a laugh.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» That statement carries a lot of weight--and especially so when coming from a compulsive liar.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Hey Guitarbullshit, don't look now but let's see you defend this.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» That's right, Max, change the subject.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Keep talking to yourself GuitarBullshit.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Just keep whoring for the teabaggers, Max.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» You don't know who you are talking to never mind that you're no better than a teabagger yourself.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» I call 'em as I see 'em.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» HEY, JOSHUA HOLLAND
Posted by: photon's feather
» More hypocrisy, numb nuts?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Really, your silliest yet!
Posted by: photon's feather
» More lies, punk?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: More lies, punk? You didn't read far enough!
Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: HEY, JOSHUA HOLLAND
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: HEY, JOSHUA HOLLAND
Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: HEY, JOSHUA HOLLAND
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Exaggerating and telling half-truths again, hypocrite?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: xaggerating and telling half-truths again, hypocrite?
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» That post does nothing to address your hypocrisy, Max.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» There you go again mistaking me for "Max" and covering up your wrongdoing.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Only one problem, Max, I don't believe you.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» There you go again mistaking me for "Max". You'd never believe the truth when it's told to you.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» That's right, Max, I'm calling you a liar.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» You don't know who you're calling a liar Guitarbullshit.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Don't equate your dishonesty and insanity with AlterNet's writers.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Keep talking to yourself GuitarBullshit.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» What's "getting hilarious", teabagger?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Why shouldn't he come back?
Posted by: photon's feather
» Obnoxious is in the eye of the beholder.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Here are two more questions for you, "Fed expert".
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Others will answer your questions...
Posted by: photon's feather
» Still doing your best to drive Obama's base into the arms of the GOP's proxy party, the "Greens"?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Still think you know hoe I voted?
Posted by: photon's feather
» Let's see, third party voters are 1.23% of the US voting population.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Then stop shouting against third parties and get a life.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» I have every right to speak out against Nader Republicans.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Lex, he calls everyone he hates Nader Republican or Max.
Posted by: LStinson1988
» RE: Lex, he calls everyone he hates Nader Republican or Max.
Posted by: photon's feather
» Then Guitarbill will have to hate himself once I reveal this SHOCKER from the archives.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» RE: Then Guitarbill will have to hate himself once I reveal this SHOCKER from the archives.
Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: Then Guitarbill will have to hate himself once I reveal this SHOCKER from the archives.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» There's nothing inheently brave about speaking up to Joshua Holland
Posted by: photon's feather
» Answer my question, Nader Republican.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» You answered it already, Obama Republican.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» That's right, Max, just make sh*t up. But should we expect less from a drooling moron?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» You don't know who you're talking to GuitarBullshit.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» I know exactly who I'm talking to, Max.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» No, you do not but keep lying to yourself.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» RE: There's nothing inheently brave about speaking up to Joshua Holland
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» RE: There's nothing inhe[r]ently brave about speaking up to Joshua Holland
Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: There's nothing inheently brave about speaking up to Joshua Holland
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Then Guitarbill will have to hate himself once I reveal this SHOCKER from the archives.
Posted by: LStinson1988
» It's not a shocker at all. Have you ever changed your mind?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Ok, so it's not a shocker but I got another one. And yeah I've changed my mind in life but
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» I don't know foreverhope. I've never met her.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: I don't know foreverhope. I've never met her.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» You owe Joshua an apology for saying Nader Republican.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Only one problem, Joshua doesn't attack the Democratic Party.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» He could be under pressure to go easy on doing so.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» That sounds like a conspiracy theory. But should we expect more from a Republican?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Then Dean Baker is "MaxPayne" by your logic. LOL !
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Don't equate your insanity with the writing of Dean Baker--you lying Nader Republican.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» GuitarBill's lying and logic are my insanity? Huh.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Is that hole as large as the hole in your head, teabagger?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Keep talking and lying to yourself.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» RE: Only one problem, Joshua doesn't attack the Democratic Party.
Posted by: Joshua Holland
» There's a huge difference between reasoned criticism and lies, smears and ad hominem attacks.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Yeah, Guitarbill does all the lies, smears and ad hominem attacks.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Moron aren't you? Still working on the difference between opinion and proof?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Obamacare - Approved by President Obama for bailing out Big Insurance.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Would you prefer nothing, teabagger?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Keep talking to yourself GuitarBullshit.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Oh that was brilliant, Max.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Keep talking and lying to yourself, foreverhope.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» RE: There's a huge difference between reasoned criticism and lies, smears and ad hominem attacks.
Posted by: photon's feather
» Tell us about lies, while you foam at the mouth, goober.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Here are two more questions for you, "Fed expert".
Posted by: Indiosmith
» Whoa, Nellie. You're correct.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Too bad Guitarbill is always wrong but it's ok.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» Too bad Max whores for the teabaggers.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Keep talking and lying to yourself.
Posted by: Lex Thomas
» RE: Clinton was different than these other guys
Posted by: drosera
» Clinton deserves credit for somthings but we lost too much longterm
Posted by: tim_s_eb@yahoo.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Arouete on Dec 28, 2009 2:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Proposed By Republicans
Posted by: FoonTheElder
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CTC123 on Dec 28, 2009 3:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NEGATIVE (-) Economic Pyramid (CTC3)
Google Search: CTC123GREEN
www.facebook.com Jerry Lee Mayeux PROFILE-INFO-PHOTO Album
Great article, Nomi Prins
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: atomsmasher on Dec 28, 2009 3:35 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I agree totally, he is their "boy"
Posted by: tim_s_eb@yahoo.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sarah84 on Dec 28, 2009 4:25 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
black metal
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: symcokid on Dec 28, 2009 5:52 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: symcokid on Dec 28, 2009 5:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rtq on Dec 28, 2009 6:02 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boycott the banks!Withdraw your money, before they steal it again.
Take it to the streets ( Wall street would be a good second to Pennsylvania ave)
Where are the true patriots?
Not for just one day but EVERY DAY FOR A MONTH!!!
Walk outs, Sit ins, refusal to pay taxes.
God this country is pathetic.
What a bunch of pussies.
We deserve everything we get.
And WHY OH WHY are we STILL sending billions to the murderous apartheid State of Israel?
While our vets sleep in the streets and 1 in 8 Americans need food stamps?
And why do we allow dual-citizens (Israeli/Americans)to hold the highest offices in the land? But no other nationality is afforded the same?
What has Israel EVER done for us?
I mean besides insist we fight and die for their "national security"
Come on people! Clue up.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So when are we going to stop whining and take to the streets?!
Posted by: Richardsievert
» Does That Mean It's Time For Pitchforks And Torches?
Posted by: Eric.Arthur.Blair
» Good one, I AM READY NOW BRO
Posted by: tim_s_eb@yahoo.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Dec 28, 2009 6:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: phist on Dec 28, 2009 6:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GuitarBill on Dec 28, 2009 8:54 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Comment report-911WEKNOW.COM
Posted by: goodday
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aberdeen on Dec 28, 2009 8:16 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHO WOULD JESUS BOMB?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Get Used To It.
Posted by: goodday
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Dec 28, 2009 8:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those elected to look after the best interests of our citizens have sold out, betrayed, and stabbed us in the back, and all for part of the money stolen from us.
Just take a look at the piece of shit called health care "reform", for instance. It's nothing more than a giant giveaway to the very racketeers that the "reform" was supposed to get around, and provide us with some relief from their larceny.
Now, look at the proposed business and financial reform. It was contemptuously swatted away by our all-powerful corporate monster.
Finally, how about the obscene octopus the "defense" department has become, the very evil entity Dwight Eisenhower warned us about way back in 1961? Not only did we not do a goddam thing about that, but we aided and abetted its creation through inaction and indifference.
There are those who say we deserve what we get, and they may well be right.
At the rate we're going, I'd be amazed if our nation lasted another 20 years.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ya missed one, Nomi
Posted by: osd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gilhowcan on Dec 28, 2009 8:28 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama campaigned one way and governs another. All talk, no action. Critical of Bush/Cheney and McCain/Palin, but an imitation of their performance. Obama talks a good one. He is an orator. He is not honest.
Look at his economic team with an examination of their wealth and their participation in the fiasco that has brought us into another depression.
Tim Geithner who barely made it through Senate confirmation, but for the cozy readiness of a so-called Democratic Senate to play patsy with their so-called Democratic Executive. And don't forget Geithner's participation in the depression when he was head of the New York Federal Reserve--who gave him a $500,000 bye-bye prize when he left to continue messing with the national economy.
Larry Summers with his ignorant contempt for women that caused him to leave the presidency of Harvard. And was he there when Obama was there?
Ben Bernanke who is considered as "man of the year" by no one but Time Magazine and Barack Obama who renominated him to continue favoring the "fat cat" special interests.
Aside from finance, look at Tom Daschle, the previous failure as Democratic leader of the Senate who rode free limousines right through the revolving doors of big corporate lobbies so recklessly that even Obama dared not allow him to go forward and cause further embarrassment. And now Daschle joins all the other glib talking Democrats calling their devastating failure at pretending to attempt real health care reform as a grand success. A success--and grand it is--only for the "fat cat" pharmaceutical and insurance companies--as well as all other medical providers.
Who's the one who went to the Senate Democrats after he was elected president and made the "request" that could not be denied that Joe Lieberman, the quisling turncoat be allowed to remain in the Democratic caucus continuing the dirty work we have seen ever since then, especially in health care reform.
Just a couple of weeks ago 30--yes 30--"Democrats" joined most of the Republicans to jinx a bill to allow the reimportation of drugs from places like Canada to allow real competition with our thieving pharmaceutical companies. Now they're all throwing in the adjective "safe" in order to sleaze out of their support for the thieving Big Pharma in plundering our population. Of course, we pay our president and senators plenty enough that they don't have to worry about the cost of drugs. And don't forget that luxurious health care we provide them, also.
It's more than a rational person can handle to juggle the glad-talking contradictions coming out of Democratics now about how wonderful this so-called health care reform is. Obama kept yapping during his campaign about his plan for a public option as opposed to a single payer plan, remember? And he kept yapping that his plan would cover the 47,000,000 people who then had no insurance. That number changed regularly, usually to a lower value. Now we are supposed to accept the Senate bill covering only 31,000,000 as real reform!
It all relates to the Republican mantra about finance, their euphemism for selfish greed. That means make the rich richer and let everyone else wallow--except for ways they can be exploited to enable the rich to become always richer. Selfish greed needs regulating laws!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Richardsievert on Dec 28, 2009 8:35 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
soldiers need picked women, Need to sow there uniforms you need to go to your neighbor and enlist a war' Once you have 1000 people call the media and tell them you have declared war on who nae ever your against who is that? find A media that will help you enlist people for your new cause declare yourself a name" Anything besides army your not in the air yet so. Not air force what will you call yourself the broken people/'
I here you once I here this new broken word I will join bet' On that you just need to get your women involved it's there war to. It's your children that will suffer' Even the ones that think there the winner' Will because angels are here and they can defend which ever one they think is the best. Even if it's one mans war.
Are you a good person are you fighting for love or more war?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Dec 28, 2009 8:51 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Ingoring Obama no Arest him that's the answer friend. Not yours'
Posted by: Richardsievert
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chaztv on Dec 28, 2009 10:22 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bender on Dec 28, 2009 10:38 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billmitchell on Dec 28, 2009 11:28 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I'll tell you what I told Les
Posted by: Joshua Holland
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eddie torres on Dec 28, 2009 12:05 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(1) Media consolidation makes Amuricuh stronger.
Wrong. Media consolidation makes Australians and Saudis stronger. Rupert Murdoch apoligists said new ownership of the Journal of Wall Street Lies would appease Rupert's global invasion ambitions and prevent a takeover of Poland - er, I mean the Intertubes. Bollocks. Now Murdoch wants to join forces with Microsoft and "de-index" / subscription firewall all their conglomerates' news content.
It's Munich all over again.
Except this time, Hitler's - er, Murdoch's - ally isn't Mussolini. It's Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, worth $16.3 billion.
(2) The Financial Times of the Oligarchy names Lloyd Blankfein is the "Hero of 2009."
Well, that's not a lie - they really did bestow hero-status on Blankfein. In reaction, the Guardian says the FT must be living in a "parallel universe." The FT heaps uncharacteristic flowery modifiers upon Blankfein such as 'scholarship boy from the Bronx', 'master of risk", and "tough, bright, funny... unpretentious, wisecracking."
Get a room already. And lest anyone shed tears for the real or imagined trauma that Blankfein may be suffering at the hands of this liburul Guardian media skewering, his shares in Goldman are worth $615m and his Central Park apartment is listed at $26m. Boo hoo.
(3) Warren Buffet says "the newspaper industry got too complacent with its success years ago."
Bollocks. Wall Street raiders borrowed billions from co-conspirator private equity rackets and launched hostile takeover strikes against major urban newspapers in the US, then saddled the captured newspapers with an exorbitant debt burden and placed their operations under the control of profit-driven "entertainment divisions." See the Bill Moyers interview with David Simon for details.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Indiosmith on Dec 28, 2009 1:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The function of the bailouts is to restore liquidity and solvency to a badly managed, undercapitalized bank system so that they can continue to function. However, that does not mean increasing lending. On the contrary, the problems in the economy have been caused by too much consumer debt. So the solution is for consumers to reduce their borrowing, not increase it.
Banks contribute to this restoration of sound credit by tightening their lending standards and issuing less credit.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eosrk on Dec 28, 2009 4:21 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eosrk on Dec 28, 2009 4:28 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gaubladt on Dec 28, 2009 5:06 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Campaign contributions need taxing
Posted by: nikolai
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bolivar on Dec 28, 2009 5:49 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nikolai on Dec 28, 2009 5:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BUT
The fact remains that "WE" and "THEY", "US" and "THEM", have a LOT in common
and the ELITE
Do not want U.S. to realize this, as
UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Dec 28, 2009 9:09 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They committed an act of Treason and should be in jail. Instead, Bernanke gets Time's Person of The Year. The head of GS is hailed as a hero and all the same players that caused the mess are still in place.
These guys get away with things in broad daylight that the mob could only dream of. Even John Gotti didn't have balls this big.
Now these criminal banksters are held up as saviours of capitalism, saving the system from collapse! Fuck me! They orchestrated and profited from the collapse, continue to do so, and in the absence of any actual reform, will cause the next collapse.
They are fucking scumbags. There is no other term for them. In the early days, an angry mob would have assembled with pitch forks and torches to string these motherfuckers up!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: charles000 on Dec 29, 2009 10:59 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Wall Street cabal of corporate criminals are self absorbed sociopaths, who have no concept of anything that would resemble ethics or standards of conduct.
They are without soul, or redemption.
At a different time, they would be lined up in the public square, awaiting their turn to meet their maker, by noose or blade.
For years we have been supposedly at war with Al Queda and related entities, with the stated goal of destroying the US economy and western capitalism.
I would offer that the Wall Street cabal of criminals have done more to destroy the US economy than any external enemy could possibly hope to do.
They have committed acts of economic treason, and should be arrested and charged with such.
Of course, that will never happen, but at some future point, if there is a higher court of a more eternal nature, they will have to answer for their crimes . . . and in that court, there are no attorneys, or corrupt government officials, or anyone else to hide behind.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: naveen jankar on Dec 29, 2009 11:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for the next phase of world history the US has to collapse and more sensible humane people (the meek?) will rise.
thank you wall street.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gimmie shelter on Dec 30, 2009 12:56 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In fact even on fiat currency they should have been left to fail and then jailed and their personal property sold at auction.
The Fed Needs to be liquidated. If they are allowed to continue we as a nation will be lucky to even be considered third world after the smoke clears.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wetwe on Jan 11, 2010 4:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bet you're wishing you didn't stab you’ in the back NOW, huh?
MKV Converter for Mac\MKV to WMV MAC\MKV to PSP MAC\MKV to iPod MAC\MKV to Xbox MAC\MKV to iPhone MAC\MKV to Apple TV MAC
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jackwen on Jan 14, 2010 9:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DavidSleep on Jan 19, 2010 1:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Erick Erickson Is the New CNN Go-to Bigot, Misogynist and Homophobe
Marketing Ate Our Culture -- But It Doesn't Have To
Let's Drop the Good Guys vs. Bad Guys Talk, We Need to Grow Up as a Species




