COMMENTS: 29
Rabid Right-Wing Media Mogul Building a News Empire
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.
If you like what Rupert Murdoch, the right-wing billionaire behind Fox News and the New York Post, has done for the national discourse, you'll love what Philip Anschutz is trying to do in your hometown.
Anschutz built his fortune -- his $8 billion net worth is good for 36th place on the Forbes 400, ahead of better-known Murdoch and Steve Jobs -- in the oil and gas industry, augmented with railroad and telecommunications holdings, as well as Regal Cinemas and the production company behind The Chronicles of Narnia films.
The far-right American Spectator describes Anschutz as "a committed conservative" who "gives lots of money to the Republican National Committee and to GOP candidates" and is "friendly with fellow oilman George W. Bush."
In 2005, Media Matters detailed Anschutz's history of conservative activism:
Anschutz has a history of supporting socially conservative causes. According to a recent Post article, Anschutz's family foundation gave James Dobson, the founder of the conservative Christian organization Focus on the Family, an award for his "contributions to the American Family." The Post noted that according to the foundation's website, Focus on the Family works to "counter the media-saturating message that homosexuality is inborn and unchangeable" and that one of the group's policy experts referred to abortion as an example of when "Satan temporarily succeeds in destroying God's creation." Further, as thePost mentioned, Anschutz contributed $10,000 in 1992 to Colorado Family Values in support of the group's efforts to pass a state constitutional amendment to invalidate state and local laws that prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation. (The referendum passed, but the United States Supreme Court struck it down as unconstitutional.) According to the Post, "Anschutz's money helped pay for an ad campaign that said such anti-bias laws gave gays and lesbians 'special rights.'"
In May 2003, the Orange County Weekly reported that other Anschutz Foundation beneficiaries include the Institute for American Values, which according to the Weekly"campaigns against single parenting," and Enough is Enough, which "promotes Internet censorship." The San Francisco Chronicle noted on February 20, 2004, that Anschutz also funds Morality in Media. As Media Matters previously noted, the Institute for American Values also receives funding from the conservative Bradley and Scaife foundations, as well as grants from the John M. Olin Foundation, another major financer of conservative organizations. Enough is Enough and Morality in Media have also received funding from the conservative Castle Rock Foundation.
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: racetoinfinity on Nov 28, 2009 2:07 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Okay So Which Is It Check It Out Or Boycott It?
Posted by: desidid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peterjkraus on Nov 28, 2009 8:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So why don't we have cooperatives, why not small-cap corporations to counter them?
This is and always has been a center-left country: the center-right bullshit being fed us is but one of the fallacies the bought media endlessly repeats. Let's get busy and counter them -- advertisers will go where buyers are, and a good progressive paper, tv station or radio station will generate enough to stay afloat.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Isn't that what Alternet and other "leftie" online publications are all about?
Posted by: UnEasyOne
» Why Won't Progressives Face the Reality That They're a Minority in This Country?
Posted by: SkeeterVT1
» RE: Why Won't Progressives Face the Reality That They're a Minority in This Country?
Posted by: Plexius2
» RE: Why Won't Progressives Face the Reality That They're a Minority in This Country?
Posted by: madregal
» RE: Why Won't Progressives Face the Reality That They're a Minority in This Country?
Posted by: aichbe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: C.Richardi on Nov 28, 2009 8:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ellie1 on Nov 28, 2009 8:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aberdeen on Nov 28, 2009 9:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have had several anti-war, anti-religious right and anti-rightwing agenda articles published by examiner.com and my views are considered to the left of AlterNet by most people, although I don't claim to be either a conservative or a liberal.
I find the terms "liberal" and "progressive" quite confining and progressive publications, similar to conservative publications, tend to represent a blind sheep following the blind dog and pony show approach for the most part, articles reflecting mainly a lot of "conservative" and "progressive" bias, rather than articles centered on helping the common people and interested in what is really true regarding how best to help them.
WHO WOULD JESUS BOMB? - video banned by YouTube, published by Examiner.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's called "journalistic tribalism;" us against them.
Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: It's called "journalistic tribalism;" us against them.
Posted by: aichbe
» RE: note on Examiner.com
Posted by: racetoinfinity
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Nov 28, 2009 10:19 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As far as I know, we STILL have anti-trust laws on the books.
It's past time to ENFORCE them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aredee on Nov 28, 2009 11:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: The_Lazy_Left on Nov 28, 2009 1:25 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Nov 28, 2009 2:45 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That comes in the wake of various reports, commentary and speeches, including from Democrats, suggesting the doctrine, which required broadcasters to seek out the other side of controversial subjects, could be revived in an Obama administration.
WHY THE HELL NOT!
people/Voters need to have all the facts presented when being updated with news broadcasts not just one side of the story being pushed by corporate interests [meaning those that pay the most]... TV broadcasts are being used as just another lobby tool by special interests groups while at the same time being masked as legitimate news when in fact its idealogue propaganda bent purposefully to get reactions that undermines elected governmental positions.
I want to know why Obama opposes reinstatement!
The Fairness Doctrine was a policy of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was (in the Commission's view) honest, equitable and balanced."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Why Don't You Ask Him?
Posted by: garyfee
» Better yet...
Posted by: orda
» If True, this shows that Obama is a fake Liberal
Posted by: jreal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: madregal on Nov 28, 2009 8:39 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but it will be wraped in 100% Americanism".
Deregulation of business and finance, destruction of worker labor unions, control of the money supply system, control of the media, constant and never ending war against "enemies" real or imagined, and a brainwashed population who don't want to think past their own wallet. Are we there yet? If not, we're damned close to it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Nov 28, 2009 9:39 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Certainly not a benign, but a malignant, growth-sector.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Prinzowhales on Nov 29, 2009 4:16 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/09/polit ics/main1600694.shtml
Just ignore Climate-gate...just because the entire basis for CAP and TRade has been shown to be nothing but a GOLF-DELTA lie, really isn't important, is it?
If Murdoch is such a demon (and he is), what's he doing supporting your precious 'progressives'?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Nov 29, 2009 5:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...even douche bags.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Nov 30, 2009 2:26 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh well, I can thank him for my LAG whilst I curse him for giving us Tim Lie-winkle.
That conservative fucker at least brought the world's game to 'Merkuh so we can do something interesting instead of watching stand-around-pointy-ball...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Wait, I thought Phil was dead!
Posted by: Tat106
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bukoo on Dec 3, 2009 6:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rip Blu ray ,Blu ray Ripper for mac
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mxcm428 on Dec 22, 2009 4:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Links of London Necklaces Szabo Links of London Earrings wanted Links of London Rings a vaginal Links of London Chain delivery and Links of London Pendants argued with hospital executives
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Erick Erickson Is the New CNN Go-to Bigot, Misogynist and Homophobe
Let's Drop the Good Guys vs. Bad Guys Talk, We Need to Grow Up as a Species
Racist Right-Wing Shock Jock Who Threatened the Lives of Judges Beats Jail Rap for Second Time




