COMMENTS: 19
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.
The New York Times headline boldly blared across my computer screen, ‘To Some, Winner Is Not American Enough’. The article debates whether Mebrahtom “Meb” Keflezighi should be considered American or American enough.
Meb attended public school in San Diego and graduated from UCLA with a BA in communications. He has gone on to become a Principal Engineer at a national semiconductor firm.
What sets Meb apart from most of us is the fact that he is a darn good long distance runner. So good in fact he received a scholarship to UCLA and won four NCAA championships. Meb represented the U.S. twice in the Olympics and won the silver medal in 2004.
He also won the New York City marathon which is when his Americaness came into question. You see, Meb is the first American, since Alberto Salazar – who was born in Cuba and immigrated to the U.S. with his family when he was two in 1982 – to win the New York City marathon. Meb is the ‘living’ American dream; he has worked hard, paid taxes, and represented his country brilliantly. Meb is just an All-American guy.
What some people cannot get over is the fact that Meb was born in Eritrea. Meb’s family immigrated to the U. S. in 1987 when he was 12, and he became a U.S. citizen in 1998.
Which brings into question, who gets to choose who is an American? Patrick J. Buchanan recently wrote an article titled “Traditional Americans Are Losing Their Nation”, in which he inferred that ‘Traditional Americans’ are White Christians and that somehow the U.S. belongs only to them and it is being stolen.
Of course, we remember that Sarah Palin believes there are only small pockets of ‘real America’ where people work hard, are very patriotic, and pro-America. These small pockets did not include New York City, Los Angeles, Denver, Dallas, Miami or any other place where diverse people and ideas live.
Ms. Palin was quickly outdone by Representative Michelle Bachmann of Minnesota who called into question then-Senator Barack Obama’s patriotism and suggested the news media should investigate whether members of Congress were “pro-America” and/or “anti-America”.
Unfortunately, this is not new. Until the 14th amendment, Blacks in America were considered two-thirds of a person. During World War II the U.S. rounded up and put into concentration camps Americans of Asian descent, and today racial profiling is use to identify people who may or may not be U.S. citizens by virtue of the color of their skin or the way they worship.
Who gets to choose who is American or American enough? And how will they choose? Will it be your skin color? Where you were born? Where your parents were born? Your religion? How well you speak the language? What party you belong to? Your sexual orientation?
Who gets to choose? Will it be one person or a committee? It may be too much for one person, maybe it should be a committee. And maybe the committee should include Patrick and Sarah and Michelle and David Duke and John Tanton. And maybe it should be called the committee of Un-American or Un-American activities. And maybe, just maybe, they can channel Senator Joseph McCarthy.
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DAD77 on Nov 4, 2009 5:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US has a government that is elected by the people. If you are born in the US, you automatically have citizenship. The government sets the rules and laws for admitting people to the United States. If you are not born here, there is a long, involved legal process, that was set up by the government elected by a majority.
Our democratic government, the rule of law, and justice through those laws is what the American Dream is all about.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DAD77 on Nov 4, 2009 5:15 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: laoma on Nov 5, 2009 4:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real underlying issue is racial. Even though Alberto Salazar was the last "American" to win the NYM, even he was Cuban born. What this idiot of a blogger is suggesting is that the winner wasn't white.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: melpol on Nov 5, 2009 5:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Stupid Is As Stupid Does Is Now Stupid Is As Stupid Speaks
Posted by: desidid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cmic on Nov 5, 2009 5:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It talks about rolling back the Enlightenment thought of universal citizenship.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: majr17440 on Nov 5, 2009 5:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Nov 5, 2009 6:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What controversy?
Posted by: VZEQICVA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Nov 5, 2009 7:16 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: One Of The Most Disturbing Post Ever On This Site
Posted by: desidid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 5, 2009 8:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: angryblkman on Nov 5, 2009 8:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bettyn on Nov 5, 2009 11:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have the rest of us forgotten that somewhere in our backgrounds there's an individual (or more likely, a bunch of folks) who came here from somewhere else? (That includes so-called Native Americans. Granted, they've been here a lot longer, but they're still descended from Asians.)
Why is this even being debated? (Yeah, I know it's racist.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mlkiser on Nov 5, 2009 7:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am stunned, disgusted and embarrassed by Darren Rovell's November 2, 2009, column (http://www.cnbc.com/id/33587668/) in which he characterizes Meb Keflezighi as only "technically American." And Mr. Rovell's November 3 apology wholly misses the most important point.
Can Mr. Rovell be so incredibly ignorant, or were his ancestors all Native Americans? If he is not descended only from Native Americans, his citizenship is distinguished from Mr. Keflezighi's only by one or more generations. Assuming that he is not Native American, does he consider the first of his predecessors to come to the United States to have been only "technically American"?
Mr. Rovell's November 3, 2009, apology (http://www.cnbc.com/id/33603449/) is not sufficient because he does not address his insult. He apologizes for not recognizing that Mr. Keflezighi "develop[ed as an athlete] at every level in America." The greater problem with his November 2 column is characterizing naturalized citizens as only "technically American." This is an incredibly demeaning and insulting statement made to every naturalized citizen. And he insulted the only people who made the conscious choice, and the considerable effort, to become Americans.
The meanness and myopia of Mr. Rovell's statement about a naturalized citizen is evidence of a significant character flaw that, I hope, makes CNBC reconsider whether they should give Mr. Rovell a platform for his xenophobic views. I most certainly do not want anyone to think that Mr. Rovell's views are those of Americans generally.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Mike
Posted by: desidid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Salmon on Nov 5, 2009 8:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about Lopez Lamong (A "lost boy of the Sudan")or Leonel Manzano (Mexico)both now U.S. citizens and O.G. 1500m finalists or O.G. 400m gold medalist Sanya Richards, (formerly Jamaica) or Alberto Salazar (born in Cuba)?
These remarkable individuals represent everything that the inscription on the Statue of Liberty stands for. We should embrace them, all. This is what the United States of America is, or should be, all about.
Mr. Rovell may have his freedom of speech, but no entity is required to give him a platform. Let's reject him and all those who spew racist drivel.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chieftech on Nov 10, 2009 1:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nature on Nov 23, 2009 3:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DAD77 on Nov 4, 2009 5:12 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US has a government that is elected by the people. If you are born in the US, you automatically have citizenship. The government sets the rules and laws for admitting people to the United States. If you are not born here, there is a long, involved legal process, that was set up by the government elected by a majority.
Our democratic government, the rule of law, and justice through those laws is what the American Dream is all about.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DAD77 on Nov 4, 2009 5:15 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: laoma on Nov 5, 2009 4:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real underlying issue is racial. Even though Alberto Salazar was the last "American" to win the NYM, even he was Cuban born. What this idiot of a blogger is suggesting is that the winner wasn't white.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: melpol on Nov 5, 2009 5:27 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Stupid Is As Stupid Does Is Now Stupid Is As Stupid Speaks
Posted by: desidid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cmic on Nov 5, 2009 5:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It talks about rolling back the Enlightenment thought of universal citizenship.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: majr17440 on Nov 5, 2009 5:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Nov 5, 2009 6:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What controversy?
Posted by: VZEQICVA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Nov 5, 2009 7:16 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: One Of The Most Disturbing Post Ever On This Site
Posted by: desidid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 5, 2009 8:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: angryblkman on Nov 5, 2009 8:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bettyn on Nov 5, 2009 11:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have the rest of us forgotten that somewhere in our backgrounds there's an individual (or more likely, a bunch of folks) who came here from somewhere else? (That includes so-called Native Americans. Granted, they've been here a lot longer, but they're still descended from Asians.)
Why is this even being debated? (Yeah, I know it's racist.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mlkiser on Nov 5, 2009 7:24 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am stunned, disgusted and embarrassed by Darren Rovell's November 2, 2009, column (http://www.cnbc.com/id/33587668/) in which he characterizes Meb Keflezighi as only "technically American." And Mr. Rovell's November 3 apology wholly misses the most important point.
Can Mr. Rovell be so incredibly ignorant, or were his ancestors all Native Americans? If he is not descended only from Native Americans, his citizenship is distinguished from Mr. Keflezighi's only by one or more generations. Assuming that he is not Native American, does he consider the first of his predecessors to come to the United States to have been only "technically American"?
Mr. Rovell's November 3, 2009, apology (http://www.cnbc.com/id/33603449/) is not sufficient because he does not address his insult. He apologizes for not recognizing that Mr. Keflezighi "develop[ed as an athlete] at every level in America." The greater problem with his November 2 column is characterizing naturalized citizens as only "technically American." This is an incredibly demeaning and insulting statement made to every naturalized citizen. And he insulted the only people who made the conscious choice, and the considerable effort, to become Americans.
The meanness and myopia of Mr. Rovell's statement about a naturalized citizen is evidence of a significant character flaw that, I hope, makes CNBC reconsider whether they should give Mr. Rovell a platform for his xenophobic views. I most certainly do not want anyone to think that Mr. Rovell's views are those of Americans generally.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Mike
Posted by: desidid
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Salmon on Nov 5, 2009 8:18 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about Lopez Lamong (A "lost boy of the Sudan")or Leonel Manzano (Mexico)both now U.S. citizens and O.G. 1500m finalists or O.G. 400m gold medalist Sanya Richards, (formerly Jamaica) or Alberto Salazar (born in Cuba)?
These remarkable individuals represent everything that the inscription on the Statue of Liberty stands for. We should embrace them, all. This is what the United States of America is, or should be, all about.
Mr. Rovell may have his freedom of speech, but no entity is required to give him a platform. Let's reject him and all those who spew racist drivel.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chieftech on Nov 10, 2009 1:35 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nature on Nov 23, 2009 3:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Chatroulette: Naked Chicks, Boys Seeking Boobs and Connections Across the Globe
Power Grab: Comcast Has a New Name, but Merger With NBC Universal Still a Bad Idea
The Skinny on Oscar-Nominated Documentaries 'Food Inc.' and 'The Cove'




