MEDIA AND CULTURE  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 19

NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?

Who gets to choose who is American or American enough? And how will they choose?
November 4, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

The New York Times headline boldly blared across my computer screen, ‘To Some, Winner Is Not American Enough’. The article debates whether Mebrahtom “Meb” Keflezighi should be considered American or American enough.

Meb attended public school in San Diego and graduated from UCLA with a BA in communications. He has gone on to become a Principal Engineer at a national semiconductor firm.

What sets Meb apart from most of us is the fact that he is a darn good long distance runner. So good in fact he received a scholarship to UCLA and won four NCAA championships. Meb represented the U.S. twice in the Olympics and won the silver medal in 2004.

He also won the New York City marathon which is when his Americaness came into question. You see, Meb is the first American, since Alberto Salazar – who was born in Cuba and immigrated to the U.S. with his family when he was two in 1982 – to win the New York City marathon. Meb is the ‘living’ American dream; he has worked hard, paid taxes, and represented his country brilliantly. Meb is just an All-American guy.

What some people cannot get over is the fact that Meb was born in Eritrea. Meb’s family immigrated to the U. S. in 1987 when he was 12, and he became a U.S. citizen in 1998.

Which brings into question, who gets to choose who is an American? Patrick J. Buchanan recently wrote an article titled “Traditional Americans Are Losing Their Nation”, in which he inferred that ‘Traditional Americans’ are White Christians and that somehow the U.S. belongs only to them and it is being stolen.

Of course, we remember that Sarah Palin believes there are only small pockets of ‘real America’ where people work hard, are very patriotic, and pro-America. These small pockets did not include New York City, Los Angeles, Denver, Dallas, Miami or any other place where diverse people and ideas live.

Ms. Palin was quickly outdone by Representative Michelle Bachmann of Minnesota who called into question then-Senator Barack Obama’s patriotism and suggested the news media should investigate whether members of Congress were “pro-America” and/or “anti-America”.

Unfortunately, this is not new. Until the 14th amendment, Blacks in America were considered two-thirds of a person. During World War II the U.S. rounded up and put into concentration camps Americans of Asian descent, and today racial profiling is use to identify people who may or may not be U.S. citizens by virtue of the color of their skin or the way they worship.

Who gets to choose who is American or American enough? And how will they choose? Will it be your skin color? Where you were born? Where your parents were born? Your religion? How well you speak the language? What party you belong to? Your sexual orientation?

Who gets to choose? Will it be one person or a committee? It may be too much for one person, maybe it should be a committee. And maybe the committee should include Patrick and Sarah and Michelle and David Duke and John Tanton. And maybe it should be called the committee of Un-American or Un-American activities. And maybe, just maybe, they can channel Senator Joseph McCarthy.


submit to reddit
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: immigration, identity, marathon, keflezighi
 

Comments are closed-

DAD77
Posted by: DAD77 on Nov 4, 2009 5:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who gets to choose?

The US has a government that is elected by the people. If you are born in the US, you automatically have citizenship. The government sets the rules and laws for admitting people to the United States. If you are not born here, there is a long, involved legal process, that was set up by the government elected by a majority.

Our democratic government, the rule of law, and justice through those laws is what the American Dream is all about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Media
Posted by: DAD77 on Nov 4, 2009 5:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The New York Times does not have the final say on who is an American.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Non-issue
Posted by: laoma on Nov 5, 2009 4:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Giving credence to cretins and morons legitimizes their thoughts and words. The public and legal records are quite clear on what it takes to become an American. Case closed.

The real underlying issue is racial. Even though Alberto Salazar was the last "American" to win the NYM, even he was Cuban born. What this idiot of a blogger is suggesting is that the winner wasn't white.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Joining America
Posted by: melpol on Nov 5, 2009 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The best way to decide who is an American is by looking at their values. Illegal immigrants who have a job and do no harm to others are Americans. Undesirables that are born here should go to rehab and learn how to join the American culture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Mainstream Fascism
Posted by: cmic on Nov 5, 2009 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A article everyone should read is "On Post-Fascism" by G.M. Tamas.

It talks about rolling back the Enlightenment thought of universal citizenship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

the old blooded "americans" are modern day terrorists
Posted by: majr17440 on Nov 5, 2009 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And these people should be labeled as such. If Someone firmly believes the constitution can be eroded only by "divine" prejudice and ignorance, they are terrorist. It should be our Police officers duty to protect the freedom that each individual in this country is granted. And we should be free to develop socially and spiritually without dogmatic brainwashing and social manipulation from those who love us. The parents pass on they"re hate to they're children essentially creating school bullies who then go on to become your maddoffs or your wwf wrestlers and police men. This cultural transference of hate and prejudice should be attacked in whatever form that can be mustered against it. If this means labeling those who perpetuate that hate to the next generation so be it. better than the alternative of endless wars and race and class struggles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What controversy?
Posted by: leafsong1 on Nov 5, 2009 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few anonymous online postings belittled his acheivement by pointing out his background. Is the presence of a few sour grapes curmudgeons among the American people really remarkable? Well, I suppose, if you make your living inventing issues to write about, it's remarkable enough. And then all the other people who have nothing to write about can comment, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What controversy? Posted by: VZEQICVA

Comments are closed-

IT SHOULD BE POINTED OUT THAT OLDER WOMEN ARE UNATTRACTIVE
Posted by: leafsong1 on Nov 5, 2009 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Men who date older women do it because they are quite obviously and literally motherfuckers. These are men who have been involved in steamy affairs with their own biological mothers for most of their lives. Most of them aren't even heterosexual; they merely sublimate their desire to submit to a powerful man by giving it to a proxy for their mothers. Often, (about 32% of the time according to a recent study) this irreconcilable internal conflict leads them to brutally murder their mothers or any "cougar" whom they manage to dupe into playing the role. It should be noted that many others engage in infantilism with their mommy-stand-ins, dressing up in diapers that they then gratuitously soil so that they can have the sexual pleasure they derive from being changed. Fortunately for those of us who find such perverisions disgusting, there are covert efforts disguised as "cougar matching" services which lure such diseased individuals to slow, horrible deaths by torture with knives, power drills, and hand-held cake mixers (don't ask). We should support the efforts of such sites to advertise wherever they get the opportunity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

WHAT ABOUT HOW FAST YOUR CAN RUN?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 5, 2009 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans have become lost in the mundane and meaningless analysis of everthing. Our military is made up of many non-citizens who are willing to serve OUR country. How American do you have to be to volunteer for the military? Answer: You don't. The NYC marathon is a race. Why not let it go at that. We invent problems where there are none. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

American enough?
Posted by: angryblkman on Nov 5, 2009 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is NOTHING but PURE Racism.California Gov.was born in Prussia and his old man was a Nazi BUT he is an American.Is it any wonder this country is slouching toward 3rd world ststus?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Meb is a legal immigrant and a naturalized U. S. citizen
Posted by: bettyn on Nov 5, 2009 11:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just like Salazar,and tennis champs Martina Navratilova and Monica Seles. He should be allowed to compete and win in any sporting event he cares to enter.....as an American.

Have the rest of us forgotten that somewhere in our backgrounds there's an individual (or more likely, a bunch of folks) who came here from somewhere else? (That includes so-called Native Americans. Granted, they've been here a lot longer, but they're still descended from Asians.)

Why is this even being debated? (Yeah, I know it's racist.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Mike
Posted by: mlkiser on Nov 5, 2009 7:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is the email that I sent to CNBC after reading Darren Rovell's column:

I am stunned, disgusted and embarrassed by Darren Rovell's November 2, 2009, column (http://www.cnbc.com/id/33587668/) in which he characterizes Meb Keflezighi as only "technically American." And Mr. Rovell's November 3 apology wholly misses the most important point.

Can Mr. Rovell be so incredibly ignorant, or were his ancestors all Native Americans? If he is not descended only from Native Americans, his citizenship is distinguished from Mr. Keflezighi's only by one or more generations. Assuming that he is not Native American, does he consider the first of his predecessors to come to the United States to have been only "technically American"?

Mr. Rovell's November 3, 2009, apology (http://www.cnbc.com/id/33603449/) is not sufficient because he does not address his insult. He apologizes for not recognizing that Mr. Keflezighi "develop[ed as an athlete] at every level in America." The greater problem with his November 2 column is characterizing naturalized citizens as only "technically American." This is an incredibly demeaning and insulting statement made to every naturalized citizen. And he insulted the only people who made the conscious choice, and the considerable effort, to become Americans.

The meanness and myopia of Mr. Rovell's statement about a naturalized citizen is evidence of a significant character flaw that, I hope, makes CNBC reconsider whether they should give Mr. Rovell a platform for his xenophobic views. I most certainly do not want anyone to think that Mr. Rovell's views are those of Americans generally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mike Posted by: desidid

Comments are closed-

Joe Herzog
Posted by: Salmon on Nov 5, 2009 8:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Rovell's comment is as racist as anything I've come across, overt as well as it is ludicrous.

What about Lopez Lamong (A "lost boy of the Sudan")or Leonel Manzano (Mexico)both now U.S. citizens and O.G. 1500m finalists or O.G. 400m gold medalist Sanya Richards, (formerly Jamaica) or Alberto Salazar (born in Cuba)?

These remarkable individuals represent everything that the inscription on the Statue of Liberty stands for. We should embrace them, all. This is what the United States of America is, or should be, all about.

Mr. Rovell may have his freedom of speech, but no entity is required to give him a platform. Let's reject him and all those who spew racist drivel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

An inconvenient truth
Posted by: chieftech on Nov 10, 2009 1:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fellow readers, at the cost of earning your ire, I have to bring forth a point that has remained unsaid although certainly felt. Whites feel terribly reduced and belittled by the accomplishments of other ethnic groups, particularly African Americans in this century. The problem is that somewhere in the culture of whites in this country is a hardened and perhaps immovable notion that there are inherently superior to any black person. This "superiority" is the problem. Whenever a black person achieves something amazing, it's value is marginalize or they are called not really American. Greatness is not ethnic in nature, its individual. I want you all who read this to look into your heart and ask yourself is what I am saying more true than false. The answer to this question will lead us to answer another question truthfully. Why won't the republicans assist the President in bringing our country out of the quagmire that the republican lead gov trapped us into? Is it because their supporters won't accept any work or idea that doesn't include a white person in the role of President. thanks for reading and thinking..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

many thanks
Posted by: nature on Nov 23, 2009 3:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can Mr. Rovell be so incredibly ignorant, or were his ancestors all Native Americans? If he is not descended only from Native Americans, his citizenship is distinguished from Mr. Keflezighi's only by one or more generations. Assuming that he is not Native American, does he consider the first of his predecessors to come to the United States to have been only "technically American"? Links of London | Links of London

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

DAD77
Posted by: DAD77 on Nov 4, 2009 5:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who gets to choose?

The US has a government that is elected by the people. If you are born in the US, you automatically have citizenship. The government sets the rules and laws for admitting people to the United States. If you are not born here, there is a long, involved legal process, that was set up by the government elected by a majority.

Our democratic government, the rule of law, and justice through those laws is what the American Dream is all about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Media
Posted by: DAD77 on Nov 4, 2009 5:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The New York Times does not have the final say on who is an American.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Non-issue
Posted by: laoma on Nov 5, 2009 4:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Giving credence to cretins and morons legitimizes their thoughts and words. The public and legal records are quite clear on what it takes to become an American. Case closed.

The real underlying issue is racial. Even though Alberto Salazar was the last "American" to win the NYM, even he was Cuban born. What this idiot of a blogger is suggesting is that the winner wasn't white.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Joining America
Posted by: melpol on Nov 5, 2009 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The best way to decide who is an American is by looking at their values. Illegal immigrants who have a job and do no harm to others are Americans. Undesirables that are born here should go to rehab and learn how to join the American culture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Mainstream Fascism
Posted by: cmic on Nov 5, 2009 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A article everyone should read is "On Post-Fascism" by G.M. Tamas.

It talks about rolling back the Enlightenment thought of universal citizenship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

the old blooded "americans" are modern day terrorists
Posted by: majr17440 on Nov 5, 2009 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And these people should be labeled as such. If Someone firmly believes the constitution can be eroded only by "divine" prejudice and ignorance, they are terrorist. It should be our Police officers duty to protect the freedom that each individual in this country is granted. And we should be free to develop socially and spiritually without dogmatic brainwashing and social manipulation from those who love us. The parents pass on they"re hate to they're children essentially creating school bullies who then go on to become your maddoffs or your wwf wrestlers and police men. This cultural transference of hate and prejudice should be attacked in whatever form that can be mustered against it. If this means labeling those who perpetuate that hate to the next generation so be it. better than the alternative of endless wars and race and class struggles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What controversy?
Posted by: leafsong1 on Nov 5, 2009 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few anonymous online postings belittled his acheivement by pointing out his background. Is the presence of a few sour grapes curmudgeons among the American people really remarkable? Well, I suppose, if you make your living inventing issues to write about, it's remarkable enough. And then all the other people who have nothing to write about can comment, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What controversy? Posted by: VZEQICVA

Comments are closed-

IT SHOULD BE POINTED OUT THAT OLDER WOMEN ARE UNATTRACTIVE
Posted by: leafsong1 on Nov 5, 2009 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Men who date older women do it because they are quite obviously and literally motherfuckers. These are men who have been involved in steamy affairs with their own biological mothers for most of their lives. Most of them aren't even heterosexual; they merely sublimate their desire to submit to a powerful man by giving it to a proxy for their mothers. Often, (about 32% of the time according to a recent study) this irreconcilable internal conflict leads them to brutally murder their mothers or any "cougar" whom they manage to dupe into playing the role. It should be noted that many others engage in infantilism with their mommy-stand-ins, dressing up in diapers that they then gratuitously soil so that they can have the sexual pleasure they derive from being changed. Fortunately for those of us who find such perverisions disgusting, there are covert efforts disguised as "cougar matching" services which lure such diseased individuals to slow, horrible deaths by torture with knives, power drills, and hand-held cake mixers (don't ask). We should support the efforts of such sites to advertise wherever they get the opportunity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

WHAT ABOUT HOW FAST YOUR CAN RUN?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 5, 2009 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans have become lost in the mundane and meaningless analysis of everthing. Our military is made up of many non-citizens who are willing to serve OUR country. How American do you have to be to volunteer for the military? Answer: You don't. The NYC marathon is a race. Why not let it go at that. We invent problems where there are none. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

American enough?
Posted by: angryblkman on Nov 5, 2009 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is NOTHING but PURE Racism.California Gov.was born in Prussia and his old man was a Nazi BUT he is an American.Is it any wonder this country is slouching toward 3rd world ststus?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Meb is a legal immigrant and a naturalized U. S. citizen
Posted by: bettyn on Nov 5, 2009 11:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just like Salazar,and tennis champs Martina Navratilova and Monica Seles. He should be allowed to compete and win in any sporting event he cares to enter.....as an American.

Have the rest of us forgotten that somewhere in our backgrounds there's an individual (or more likely, a bunch of folks) who came here from somewhere else? (That includes so-called Native Americans. Granted, they've been here a lot longer, but they're still descended from Asians.)

Why is this even being debated? (Yeah, I know it's racist.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Mike
Posted by: mlkiser on Nov 5, 2009 7:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is the email that I sent to CNBC after reading Darren Rovell's column:

I am stunned, disgusted and embarrassed by Darren Rovell's November 2, 2009, column (http://www.cnbc.com/id/33587668/) in which he characterizes Meb Keflezighi as only "technically American." And Mr. Rovell's November 3 apology wholly misses the most important point.

Can Mr. Rovell be so incredibly ignorant, or were his ancestors all Native Americans? If he is not descended only from Native Americans, his citizenship is distinguished from Mr. Keflezighi's only by one or more generations. Assuming that he is not Native American, does he consider the first of his predecessors to come to the United States to have been only "technically American"?

Mr. Rovell's November 3, 2009, apology (http://www.cnbc.com/id/33603449/) is not sufficient because he does not address his insult. He apologizes for not recognizing that Mr. Keflezighi "develop[ed as an athlete] at every level in America." The greater problem with his November 2 column is characterizing naturalized citizens as only "technically American." This is an incredibly demeaning and insulting statement made to every naturalized citizen. And he insulted the only people who made the conscious choice, and the considerable effort, to become Americans.

The meanness and myopia of Mr. Rovell's statement about a naturalized citizen is evidence of a significant character flaw that, I hope, makes CNBC reconsider whether they should give Mr. Rovell a platform for his xenophobic views. I most certainly do not want anyone to think that Mr. Rovell's views are those of Americans generally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mike Posted by: desidid

Comments are closed-

Joe Herzog
Posted by: Salmon on Nov 5, 2009 8:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Rovell's comment is as racist as anything I've come across, overt as well as it is ludicrous.

What about Lopez Lamong (A "lost boy of the Sudan")or Leonel Manzano (Mexico)both now U.S. citizens and O.G. 1500m finalists or O.G. 400m gold medalist Sanya Richards, (formerly Jamaica) or Alberto Salazar (born in Cuba)?

These remarkable individuals represent everything that the inscription on the Statue of Liberty stands for. We should embrace them, all. This is what the United States of America is, or should be, all about.

Mr. Rovell may have his freedom of speech, but no entity is required to give him a platform. Let's reject him and all those who spew racist drivel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

An inconvenient truth
Posted by: chieftech on Nov 10, 2009 1:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fellow readers, at the cost of earning your ire, I have to bring forth a point that has remained unsaid although certainly felt. Whites feel terribly reduced and belittled by the accomplishments of other ethnic groups, particularly African Americans in this century. The problem is that somewhere in the culture of whites in this country is a hardened and perhaps immovable notion that there are inherently superior to any black person. This "superiority" is the problem. Whenever a black person achieves something amazing, it's value is marginalize or they are called not really American. Greatness is not ethnic in nature, its individual. I want you all who read this to look into your heart and ask yourself is what I am saying more true than false. The answer to this question will lead us to answer another question truthfully. Why won't the republicans assist the President in bringing our country out of the quagmire that the republican lead gov trapped us into? Is it because their supporters won't accept any work or idea that doesn't include a white person in the role of President. thanks for reading and thinking..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

many thanks
Posted by: nature on Nov 23, 2009 3:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can Mr. Rovell be so incredibly ignorant, or were his ancestors all Native Americans? If he is not descended only from Native Americans, his citizenship is distinguished from Mr. Keflezighi's only by one or more generations. Assuming that he is not Native American, does he consider the first of his predecessors to come to the United States to have been only "technically American"? Links of London | Links of London

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS