COMMENTS: 31
This Year's Biggest Hoax Is Tim Geithner's 'Solution' for the Economy, Not the Balloon Boy
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.
Who are these people? I am not referring to the pathetic parents of “Balloon Boy,” whose fake drama I have been unable to escape while on the treadmill this week, thanks to my gym’s insistence on tuning its flat-screen TVs to Wolf Blitzer’s nonstop self-parody.
The Colorado incident was significant only in the tawdriness of those who perpetrated the made-for-TV scam and their allies in the mindless media who covered this sham “reality” so relentlessly. But even so, it was enough to push aside most consideration of the true hoax reported last week with far less fervor: the obscene rewards that Wall Street bankers bestowed upon themselves for ripping off our economy.
The people I want to know more about are the superrich who expect to be rewarded for their failures, like the folks at Goldman Sachs who will receive $16.71 billion in bonuses—an average of $530,000 per employee—this year after their company did as much as any to bring the world economy to the brink of disaster.
“The Guys from Government Sachs” is what The New York Times once called them in recognition of their chokehold on the federal government. Their power is marked by the two treasury secretaries who led the fight to legally enable and then reward Wall Street for its obscene excesses. Why wasn’t there a CNN stakeout at the homes of former Goldman-execs-turned-treasury-chiefs Robert Rubin and Henry Paulson aimed at finding out how they feel about the almost $7 billion profit that Goldman Sachs made in the last two quarters in the wake of the government’s bailout of the firm?
They were both deeply involved last fall, along with Rubin protégé and current Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, then head of the New York Fed, in saving Goldman as archrival Lehman Brothers was forced to go belly up. As opposed to Lehman, Goldman was allowed to change its status and become a commercial bank qualifying for Federal Reserve and TARP funding. Goldman received $10 billion in immediate bailout funds, and we are supposed to be grateful that the company has paid it back in return for an end to any pretense of government control over its executive compensation. The additional cool $12.9 billion that Goldman received from the government as a pass-through from the bailout of AIG to cover Goldman’s toxic paper is money the investment bank has no intention of ever paying back.
The rationale for saving Goldman and the other too-big-to-fail usurers was that the rescue would increase lending to businesses and consumers and thus revive the economy. But Goldman made money last quarter by shunning such loans and instead putting the government-guaranteed low-interest money it now can borrow toward acquisitions and bond and stock trading. As The New York Times reported: “Titans like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase are making fortunes in hot areas like trading stocks and bonds, rather than the ho-hum business of lending people money.”
Under the headline “Bailout Helps Fuel a New Era of Wall Street Wealth,” Times reporter Graham Bowley detailed many of the enabling favors that the government, under two presidents, extended to Goldman, like clearing the way for the company to issue bonds guaranteed by the FDIC. “It may come as a surprise that one of the most powerful forces driving the resurgence on Wall Street,” the Times reported, “is not the banks but Washington. Many of the steps that policy makers took last year to stabilize the financial system—reducing interest rates to near zero, bolstering big banks with taxpayer money, guaranteeing billions of dollars of financial institution debts—helped set the stage for this new era of Wall Street wealth.”
It should not come as a surprise to Timothy Geithner, who, as The Wall Street Journal reported last week, talks to the honchos of Goldman more often than to members of Congress ostensibly in charge of banking legislation. Nor will it shock the lobbyists for Wall Street—augmented, as The Nation reported last week, by the pro-Goldman efforts of former Democratic congressman and faux populist Dick Gephardt—that the rich will emerge richer from this deep recession in which so many Americans have lost everything. The die is cast: People working in finance grabbed two-thirds of the growth in GDP over the last decade, with the rest of us scrambling for the other third.
Nor will the situation change anytime soon. The House Financial Services Committee is in charge of writing new rules to protect consumers, but as the respected Sunlight Foundation reports, 27 of the 71 members of that committee receive at least one-fourth of their campaign funds from the financial industry, with the rest of the committee members not far behind.
Now if we could get one of the banking lobbyists to float a duct-taped flying saucer balloon, Wolf Blitzer might cover the real hoax.
This article first appeared on TruthDig -- read the original here.
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 22, 2009 12:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And Wolf Blitzer? Why pee on a weed Robert?
As a former Editor of the Jerusalem Post Blitzer knows all too well how to dissemble, prevaricate and divert attention from what is really happening ...
Any thinking individual has already given up on corporate media. Those that haven't probably won't read anything resembling journalism.
Though I must say Dylan Ratigan over at CNBC is giving Goldman pretty rough treatment.
The fact is corporate media is a lost cause ... they cover the tea baggers protests but not the Gay Rights Protest. The media even refuse to put the number of protesters out other than say thousands ...
I read recently that we need local protests instead of these large protests and I fully agree. I myself cannot make it to DC or New York but I want to protest.
It is time to take it to the streets locally and broadcast our own news ... F Wolf Blitzer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Corporate Media Cover the Truth ?
Posted by: orda
» RE: Corporate Media Cover the Truth ?
Posted by: pawheel
» and if the WOlfman was not sufficiently trained at the JPost, his serice under Pat Robertson
Posted by: HalEBurton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lclark on Oct 22, 2009 1:36 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then it turned out it would only be the top 25 earners.
Then it turned out they would get stock instead of cash.........!!!!!
They have so many ways of scamming us, it's an art the government and multinationals have refined to a science.
The government is a joke, the Congress is a bunch of carney's,
and the President is hopeless.
Vote 3rd party...any third party.
VotE
E
Them all
Out
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Oct 22, 2009 5:02 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If that one child is so important to the news, then why doesn't little 'Wolfie' and that drunk rodeo clown dedicate some serious air time and look into the over 15,000 American kids that disappear each year?
Or would that story lead them to places they don't want to go?
If truth in advertising applied to the 'Three Stooges' of cable news, they'd be out of business.
Oops, gotta run!! CNN and FOX has found some more juicy details about Michael Jackson's death!!!
OMG!!!! OMG!!!!
After that MSNBC is dedicating a whole hour to looking back at Anna Nichole Smith!!!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Bull[expletive deleted]! Admit it, you like Paris Hilton's nickers
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Oct 22, 2009 6:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The truth is everyone needs to wake up, stop drowning yourselves in infotainment and idiocy! OUR GOVERNMENT IS BEING HIJACKED BY THE CORPORATE OLIGARCHY, AND IT IS PAST TIME THAT WE STAND TOGETHER TO TAKE IT BACK, NOW!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The "MSM & the TRUTH"!!!!!
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: The "MSM & the TRUTH"!!!!!
Posted by: halg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PakiBoy on Oct 22, 2009 6:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Razional Thinker on Oct 22, 2009 7:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Oct 22, 2009 7:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Deflate...
Posted by: pauldd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james108 on Oct 22, 2009 7:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only thing they can allow "agreement" on is mandating insurance, criminalizing not having it with the "promise" that people they consider too poor will get subsidies or exempted...
The public option was a good third. First, they ignore the regulations preventing insurance companies from competing across state lines, then say we need to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to simulate competition, gut medicare and call it savings, and then come up with a plan that costs thousands of dollars per person per year in taxes but still somehow needs to charge a competitive premium with private insurance.
I guess the biggest joke is BO himself, how people will actually fall for hogwash if he says it sometimes. The democrats (and republicans, but they're less relevant now) completely ignore liberals and liberal fiscal conservatives and focus on right wing sock puppets, pretending that there are no better solutions when in fact they're ignoring and suppressing real social solutions that don't line their backer's pockets, holding us hostage for their brand of corporate fascism and globalist exploitation for bipartisan multinational corporations.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I don't know...
Posted by: CarlaWaters
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 22, 2009 8:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Corporation for Public Broadcasting ?
Posted by: weathered
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lclark on Oct 22, 2009 10:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Germany has a non-profit, publicly funded plan that allows companies and individuals to supplement.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zigy on Oct 22, 2009 10:36 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's amazing...
Posted by: james108
» RE: It's amazing...
Posted by: weathered
» "Ward, Beaver and Wally are home and they've been gang-raped"
Posted by: Lese Majeste
Comments are closed-
Posted by: keyboardtek on Oct 22, 2009 10:57 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no idea how one could indeed verify that G-S did not need the bailout money. Anyone know if this is true?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Goldman-Sachs did not need the bailout money
Posted by: JSquercia
» exactly
Posted by: james108
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JSquercia on Oct 22, 2009 11:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yesterday . He called for the abolition of Derivatives and their Ilk labeling them Gambling and he advocated the idea of a return to those days when Banks were Banks and Investment Banks were separated by a wall from Commercial Banks and Insurance Companies . In effect he advocated a return to the law that served us so well for 50 years Glass-Steagall. This of course flies in face of Rubin and Summers
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Paul Volker
Posted by: wormfarmer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Oct 22, 2009 5:52 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Romantic Violence on Oct 23, 2009 9:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FTW
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tonyvera on Oct 25, 2009 2:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 22, 2009 12:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And Wolf Blitzer? Why pee on a weed Robert?
As a former Editor of the Jerusalem Post Blitzer knows all too well how to dissemble, prevaricate and divert attention from what is really happening ...
Any thinking individual has already given up on corporate media. Those that haven't probably won't read anything resembling journalism.
Though I must say Dylan Ratigan over at CNBC is giving Goldman pretty rough treatment.
The fact is corporate media is a lost cause ... they cover the tea baggers protests but not the Gay Rights Protest. The media even refuse to put the number of protesters out other than say thousands ...
I read recently that we need local protests instead of these large protests and I fully agree. I myself cannot make it to DC or New York but I want to protest.
It is time to take it to the streets locally and broadcast our own news ... F Wolf Blitzer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Corporate Media Cover the Truth ?
Posted by: orda
» RE: Corporate Media Cover the Truth ?
Posted by: pawheel
» and if the WOlfman was not sufficiently trained at the JPost, his serice under Pat Robertson
Posted by: HalEBurton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lclark on Oct 22, 2009 1:36 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then it turned out it would only be the top 25 earners.
Then it turned out they would get stock instead of cash.........!!!!!
They have so many ways of scamming us, it's an art the government and multinationals have refined to a science.
The government is a joke, the Congress is a bunch of carney's,
and the President is hopeless.
Vote 3rd party...any third party.
VotE
E
Them all
Out
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Oct 22, 2009 5:02 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If that one child is so important to the news, then why doesn't little 'Wolfie' and that drunk rodeo clown dedicate some serious air time and look into the over 15,000 American kids that disappear each year?
Or would that story lead them to places they don't want to go?
If truth in advertising applied to the 'Three Stooges' of cable news, they'd be out of business.
Oops, gotta run!! CNN and FOX has found some more juicy details about Michael Jackson's death!!!
OMG!!!! OMG!!!!
After that MSNBC is dedicating a whole hour to looking back at Anna Nichole Smith!!!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Bull[expletive deleted]! Admit it, you like Paris Hilton's nickers
Posted by: GuitarBill
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Oct 22, 2009 6:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The truth is everyone needs to wake up, stop drowning yourselves in infotainment and idiocy! OUR GOVERNMENT IS BEING HIJACKED BY THE CORPORATE OLIGARCHY, AND IT IS PAST TIME THAT WE STAND TOGETHER TO TAKE IT BACK, NOW!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The "MSM & the TRUTH"!!!!!
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: The "MSM & the TRUTH"!!!!!
Posted by: halg
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PakiBoy on Oct 22, 2009 6:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Razional Thinker on Oct 22, 2009 7:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Oct 22, 2009 7:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Deflate...
Posted by: pauldd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james108 on Oct 22, 2009 7:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only thing they can allow "agreement" on is mandating insurance, criminalizing not having it with the "promise" that people they consider too poor will get subsidies or exempted...
The public option was a good third. First, they ignore the regulations preventing insurance companies from competing across state lines, then say we need to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to simulate competition, gut medicare and call it savings, and then come up with a plan that costs thousands of dollars per person per year in taxes but still somehow needs to charge a competitive premium with private insurance.
I guess the biggest joke is BO himself, how people will actually fall for hogwash if he says it sometimes. The democrats (and republicans, but they're less relevant now) completely ignore liberals and liberal fiscal conservatives and focus on right wing sock puppets, pretending that there are no better solutions when in fact they're ignoring and suppressing real social solutions that don't line their backer's pockets, holding us hostage for their brand of corporate fascism and globalist exploitation for bipartisan multinational corporations.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I don't know...
Posted by: CarlaWaters
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 22, 2009 8:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Corporation for Public Broadcasting ?
Posted by: weathered
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lclark on Oct 22, 2009 10:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Germany has a non-profit, publicly funded plan that allows companies and individuals to supplement.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zigy on Oct 22, 2009 10:36 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's amazing...
Posted by: james108
» RE: It's amazing...
Posted by: weathered
» "Ward, Beaver and Wally are home and they've been gang-raped"
Posted by: Lese Majeste
Comments are closed-
Posted by: keyboardtek on Oct 22, 2009 10:57 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no idea how one could indeed verify that G-S did not need the bailout money. Anyone know if this is true?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Goldman-Sachs did not need the bailout money
Posted by: JSquercia
» exactly
Posted by: james108
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JSquercia on Oct 22, 2009 11:14 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yesterday . He called for the abolition of Derivatives and their Ilk labeling them Gambling and he advocated the idea of a return to those days when Banks were Banks and Investment Banks were separated by a wall from Commercial Banks and Insurance Companies . In effect he advocated a return to the law that served us so well for 50 years Glass-Steagall. This of course flies in face of Rubin and Summers
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Paul Volker
Posted by: wormfarmer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Oct 22, 2009 5:52 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Romantic Violence on Oct 23, 2009 9:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FTW
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tonyvera on Oct 25, 2009 2:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Erick Erickson Is the New CNN Go-to Bigot, Misogynist and Homophobe
Chatroulette: Naked Chicks, Boys Seeking Boobs and Connections Across the Globe
Power Grab: Comcast Has a New Name, but Merger With NBC Universal Still a Bad Idea




