Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

This Year's Biggest Hoax Is Tim Geithner's 'Solution' for the Economy, Not the Balloon Boy

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted October 22, 2009.


If we could get one of the banking lobbyists to float a duct-taped flying saucer balloon, Wolf Blitzer might cover the real hoax.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Who are these people? I am not referring to the pathetic parents of “Balloon Boy,” whose fake drama I have been unable to escape while on the treadmill this week, thanks to my gym’s insistence on tuning its flat-screen TVs to Wolf Blitzer’s nonstop self-parody. 

The Colorado incident was significant only in the tawdriness of those who perpetrated the made-for-TV scam and their allies in the mindless media who covered this sham “reality” so relentlessly. But even so, it was enough to push aside most consideration of the true hoax reported last week with far less fervor: the obscene rewards that Wall Street bankers bestowed upon themselves for ripping off our economy. 

The people I want to know more about are the superrich who expect to be rewarded for their failures, like the folks at Goldman Sachs who will receive $16.71 billion in bonuses—an average of $530,000 per employee—this year after their company did as much as any to bring the world economy to the brink of disaster. 

“The Guys from Government Sachs” is what The New York Times once called them in recognition of their chokehold on the federal government. Their power is marked by the two treasury secretaries who led the fight to legally enable and then reward Wall Street for its obscene excesses. Why wasn’t there a CNN stakeout at the homes of former Goldman-execs-turned-treasury-chiefs Robert Rubin and Henry Paulson aimed at finding out how they feel about the almost $7 billion profit that Goldman Sachs made in the last two quarters in the wake of the government’s bailout of the firm?

They were both deeply involved last fall, along with Rubin protégé and current Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, then head of the New York Fed, in saving Goldman as archrival Lehman Brothers was forced to go belly up. As opposed to Lehman, Goldman was allowed to change its status and become a commercial bank qualifying for Federal Reserve and TARP funding. Goldman received $10 billion in immediate bailout funds, and we are supposed to be grateful that the company has paid it back in return for an end to any pretense of government control over its executive compensation. The additional cool $12.9 billion that Goldman received from the government as a pass-through from the bailout of AIG to cover Goldman’s toxic paper is money the investment bank has no intention of ever paying back.

The rationale for saving Goldman and the other too-big-to-fail usurers was that the rescue would increase lending to businesses and consumers and thus revive the economy. But Goldman made money last quarter by shunning such loans and instead putting the government-guaranteed low-interest money it now can borrow toward acquisitions and bond and stock trading. As The New York Times reported: “Titans like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase are making fortunes in hot areas like trading stocks and bonds, rather than the ho-hum business of lending people money.”

Under the headline “Bailout Helps Fuel a New Era of Wall Street Wealth,” Times reporter Graham Bowley detailed many of the enabling favors that the government, under two presidents, extended to Goldman, like clearing the way for the company to issue bonds guaranteed by the FDIC. “It may come as a surprise that one of the most powerful forces driving the resurgence on Wall Street,” the Times reported, “is not the banks but Washington. Many of the steps that policy makers took last year to stabilize the financial system—reducing interest rates to near zero, bolstering big banks with taxpayer money, guaranteeing billions of dollars of financial institution debts—helped set the stage for this new era of Wall Street wealth.”

It should not come as a surprise to Timothy Geithner, who, as The Wall Street Journal reported last week, talks to the honchos of Goldman more often than to members of Congress ostensibly in charge of banking legislation. Nor will it shock the lobbyists for Wall Street—augmented, as The Nation reported last week, by the pro-Goldman efforts of former Democratic congressman and faux populist Dick Gephardt—that the rich will emerge richer from this deep recession in which so many Americans have lost everything. The die is cast: People working in finance grabbed two-thirds of the growth in GDP over the last decade, with the rest of us scrambling for the other third.

Nor will the situation change anytime soon. The House Financial Services Committee is in charge of writing new rules to protect consumers, but as the respected Sunlight Foundation reports, 27 of the 71 members of that committee receive at least one-fourth of their campaign funds from the financial industry, with the rest of the committee members not far behind.

Now if we could get one of the banking lobbyists to float a duct-taped flying saucer balloon, Wolf Blitzer might cover the real hoax.

This article first appeared on TruthDig -- read the original here.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: economy, tim geithner, balloon boy

Robert Scheer is Editor in Chief of Truthdig and author of a new book, The Pornography of Power: How Defense Hawks Hijacked 9/11 and Weakened America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Corporate Media Cover the Truth ?
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 22, 2009 12:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only when it doesn't involve embarrassing their corporate brethren.

And Wolf Blitzer? Why pee on a weed Robert?

As a former Editor of the Jerusalem Post Blitzer knows all too well how to dissemble, prevaricate and divert attention from what is really happening ...

Any thinking individual has already given up on corporate media. Those that haven't probably won't read anything resembling journalism.

Though I must say Dylan Ratigan over at CNBC is giving Goldman pretty rough treatment.

The fact is corporate media is a lost cause ... they cover the tea baggers protests but not the Gay Rights Protest. The media even refuse to put the number of protesters out other than say thousands ...

I read recently that we need local protests instead of these large protests and I fully agree. I myself cannot make it to DC or New York but I want to protest.

It is time to take it to the streets locally and broadcast our own news ... F Wolf Blitzer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deceit and corruption
Posted by: lclark on Oct 22, 2009 1:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
News reported today those high payed bankers will get 90% of the salaries cut.

Then it turned out it would only be the top 25 earners.

Then it turned out they would get stock instead of cash.........!!!!!

They have so many ways of scamming us, it's an art the government and multinationals have refined to a science.

The government is a joke, the Congress is a bunch of carney's,
and the President is hopeless.

Vote 3rd party...any third party.

VotE
E
Them all
Out

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Have you heard the latest on Paris Hilton? CCN, FOX, MSNBC at 9 EST
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Oct 22, 2009 5:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If FUX, CNN--Certainly Not News and MSnnnnoozBC can't find a distraction, they'lll gin one up by covering some sad story about a child being kidnapped and murdered.

If that one child is so important to the news, then why doesn't little 'Wolfie' and that drunk rodeo clown dedicate some serious air time and look into the over 15,000 American kids that disappear each year?

Or would that story lead them to places they don't want to go?

If truth in advertising applied to the 'Three Stooges' of cable news, they'd be out of business.

Oops, gotta run!! CNN and FOX has found some more juicy details about Michael Jackson's death!!!

OMG!!!! OMG!!!!

After that MSNBC is dedicating a whole hour to looking back at Anna Nichole Smith!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The "MSM & the TRUTH"!!!!!
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Oct 22, 2009 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Getting the MSM to actually cover "the truth" is like finding those WMD's in Iraq! If the MSM were ever once independent they are mostly Corporate owned, and as we all saw with Dan Rather they will not allow the truth to be published! Those "journalists" know which side their bread gets buttered, so they understand that "fluff", "info-tainment", and "distractions" are now the norm! In the meantime the American public has been the loser and dumbed down to the point that Americans actually voted to return the little idiot GWB back into to office!

The truth is everyone needs to wake up, stop drowning yourselves in infotainment and idiocy! OUR GOVERNMENT IS BEING HIJACKED BY THE CORPORATE OLIGARCHY, AND IT IS PAST TIME THAT WE STAND TOGETHER TO TAKE IT BACK, NOW!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The "MSM & the TRUTH"!!!!! Posted by: VZEQICVA
Bread and Circus and the dumbing down of America
Posted by: PakiBoy on Oct 22, 2009 6:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Want More "T" and "A".....
Posted by: Razional Thinker on Oct 22, 2009 7:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....transparency and accountability. Much more!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Both...
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Oct 22, 2009 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the economy and balloons are inflatable and eventually pop or lose air...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Deflate... Posted by: pauldd
I don't know...
Posted by: james108 on Oct 22, 2009 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The democrats' solution to "health care" is a close second, if so.

The only thing they can allow "agreement" on is mandating insurance, criminalizing not having it with the "promise" that people they consider too poor will get subsidies or exempted...

The public option was a good third. First, they ignore the regulations preventing insurance companies from competing across state lines, then say we need to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to simulate competition, gut medicare and call it savings, and then come up with a plan that costs thousands of dollars per person per year in taxes but still somehow needs to charge a competitive premium with private insurance.

I guess the biggest joke is BO himself, how people will actually fall for hogwash if he says it sometimes. The democrats (and republicans, but they're less relevant now) completely ignore liberals and liberal fiscal conservatives and focus on right wing sock puppets, pretending that there are no better solutions when in fact they're ignoring and suppressing real social solutions that don't line their backer's pockets, holding us hostage for their brand of corporate fascism and globalist exploitation for bipartisan multinational corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I don't know... Posted by: CarlaWaters
THE REAL HOAX IS THE "NEWS"
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 22, 2009 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All day everyday the news goes on endlessly. As for Geithner and the 'rest of the story' well it's on PBS. In the last few months they have run some outstanding coverage of events leading up to where we are today. Problem is very few people care. CNN would wither and die if they ran truly informative material. So it's Wolf and his amazing visual junk that gives the people what they want. Geithner is not the problem. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yep
Posted by: lclark on Oct 22, 2009 10:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lou Dobbs covered the plans in other nations. What I noticed was we spend more than all the others on health care (% of GNP) and had fewer doctors.

Germany has a non-profit, publicly funded plan that allows companies and individuals to supplement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So, Mr. Scheer, you're just comprehending this a year after it happened?
Posted by: zigy on Oct 22, 2009 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I (and I would bet most of the readers here) Knew at least the gist of what was happening as it unfolded last fall and winter. I can get a clearer picture of economic reality by following rense.com, counterpunch.org, whatreallyhappened.com, and yes, even the paranoid wacko, Alex Jones. Why waste time paying attention to the dog and pony shows of ABCCBSNBCFOX....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's amazing... Posted by: james108
» RE: It's amazing... Posted by: weathered
Goldman-Sachs did not need the bailout money
Posted by: keyboardtek on Oct 22, 2009 10:57 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I happened to do some repair work in a huge mansion for a nice guy who used to work for Goldman-Sachs. He told me that the issue of their executives getting bonuses was misrepresented in the media. He told me that G-S did not need the bailout money. The feds supposedly forced them to take the money because if they did not, a "stigma" would be attached to any business that took the bailout money. The Feds wanted G-S to take it to reduce any "stigma" the other companies would have. G-S supposedly tried to repay the bailout money right away but were stalled by the Feds. So the executive bonuses would not have come out of taxpayer money.
I have no idea how one could indeed verify that G-S did not need the bailout money. Anyone know if this is true?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» exactly Posted by: james108
Paul Volker
Posted by: JSquercia on Oct 22, 2009 11:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paul Volker who has been basically shut out of of giving advice to Obama said some UGLY TRUTHS
yesterday . He called for the abolition of Derivatives and their Ilk labeling them Gambling and he advocated the idea of a return to those days when Banks were Banks and Investment Banks were separated by a wall from Commercial Banks and Insurance Companies . In effect he advocated a return to the law that served us so well for 50 years Glass-Steagall. This of course flies in face of Rubin and Summers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Paul Volker Posted by: wormfarmer
Save ourselves
Posted by: wormfarmer on Oct 22, 2009 5:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rubin and Summers instigated the repeal of Glass-Steagall during the Clinton administration, which gave a blessing to wall street to make as much money as possible. Re-instate that policy and erect that barrier once again, we were supposed to have gained knowledge from the depression, WHAT HAPPENED? Well it happened again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Year's Biggest Hoax
Posted by: Romantic Violence on Oct 23, 2009 9:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know this site is full with full-time and devoted Obamamites however, the year's biggest hoax is Obama..did you all not see who he appointed in the first place? Did you all not see the people he surrounded himself with? Did you all not research his record when he was a Senator? The Biggest Joke of the Year has been played on all of us..

FTW

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Buck Stops With Obama
Posted by: tonyvera on Oct 25, 2009 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We, many voters, by now know about the nauseatingly incestuous relationship between White House finance staff and Goldman-Sachs. But I need to understand how President Obama is responding to this outrage. In my book, on many counts, Obama is working his way toward a one-term presidency, and hardly approaching the promise of his candidacy, Nobel Peace Prize and all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement