COMMENTS: 122
Our Last Chance to Preserve Life On Earth Is Slipping Away
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Media and Culture headlines via email.
This excerpt was reprinted from the book Last Chance: Preserving Life on Earth by Larry J. Schweiger with permission from Fulcrum Publishing.
In the Absence of Light
A few years ago, we invited a group of low-income children from urban Pittsburgh to visit a distant natural area in Fayette County, Pennsylvania, for an owl watch. As night fell, the children became startled as they got their first glimpse of the myriad bright stars set in a clear, black sky. These kids had never seen a night sky in the absence of ambient light. Urban haze and light pollution had completely blocked their view of the heavens and dimmed their sense of the magnitude of creation.
Shallow news coverage causes most Americans to underestimate the urgency of the threat of global warming. Television’s failure to adequately cover the climate threat, along with the deliberate opacity created by massive oil and coal advertising, masks the vivid realities of the situation, much like the haze and light pollution blocked out the reality of the night sky for those urban kids.
The television has been described as a weapon of mass distraction. On hearing about the methane leaking from the Siberian Sea, one Canadian blogger mockingly wrote, “Runaway climate change? Massive methane release off Siberia? Nah, let’s talk about Wall Street instead!” Meanwhile, on “the upper decks of our ‘Titanic,’ everyone is worried stiff about a crisis on Wall Street.”
Denial is a too-common human tendency, especially around global warming. On June 23, 2008, twenty years since he first warned Congress that human activity was causing the earth to warm, James Hansen warned that a “wide gap has developed between what is understood about global warming by the relevant scientific communities and what is known by policymakers and the public.”
I have often wondered why so many media outlets have developed an excessive and endless fascination with fallen stars, kidnappings, rapes, and other violent crimes to the exclusion of news that we can actually use. Perhaps it is because Americans en masse watch that mindless stuff over and over again, thus supporting it and demanding more of it. Besides, that type of “news” is simple and cheap to produce and does not take a rocket scientist to present. Tabloid journalism, replayed continuously for days, weeks, and months on end is apparently profitable. “Infotainment” is not journalism. Networks and cable channels focus on making news shows more entertaining to pump up ratings that link to greater advertising revenues. Former vice president Al Gore described this in his book The Assault on Reason as “a new pattern of serial obsessions that periodically take over the airwaves for weeks at a time.”
Apart from the direct influence of coal and oil advertisers, I fail to understand why the news media ducks or ignores these terribly important stories. In September 2006, Katey Walter, leading a US-Russian team of scientists, published an important paper in Nature warning that melting permafrost in Siberia, covering more than 10 million square kilometers of Russia, is releasing five times the amount of methane previously estimated by scientists. Walter compared the melting Siberian permafrost and the massive amounts of frozen methane that could be discharged as “a (ticking) time bomb waiting to go off,” threaten the world’s climate.
You would think Walter’s shocking findings would be newsworthy. Well, you would be wrong. While Radio Free Europe, the BBC, and NPR found it newsworthy, the mainstream US media was completely distracted by mindless pursuits. At this same time, network and cable channels were in a frenzy, with satellite trucks gathered in front of the Boulder, Colorado, district attorney’s office to report titillating details of JonBenét Ramsey’s warped admirer and supposed killer, John Mark Karr.
Another instance in a long line of US media failures occurred on December 12, 2007, when Wieslaw Maslowski, a research professor at the Naval Postgraduate School, told a large gathering at the American Geophysical Union meeting that the Arctic will be ice-free sometime during the summer of 2013. Disappearing Arctic ice threatens to amplify global warming, yet Maslowski’s troubling findings were not covered by any of the networks, not even CNN. Instead, US viewers were preoccupied with the strange behavior of Drew Peterson in the disappearance of his fourth wife, Stacy.
Stay up to date with the latest Media and Culture headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dobermanmacleod on Aug 17, 2009 12:39 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mankind probably(inadvertently) changed the climate thousands of years ago with slash and burn agriculture, maintaining the historically unusually hospitable climate period called the "Holocene." Furthermore, mankind's short-lived sun dimming pollution is probably cooling us down right now about 1C (a phenomena Dr James Lovelock has named a "fool's climate").
While a agree with the author that we are headed toward a climate catastrophe, and also that the media has done us a disservice by not informing us properly about the current trajectory, it is myopic to think mankind is just going to sit around and let our Earth go into a hot state like 55 millions years (the PETM) when most life died.
"The alternative (to geoengineering) is the acceptance of a massive natural cull of humanity and a return to an Earth that freely regulates itself but in the hot state." --Dr James Lovelock, August 2008
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There is a cheap and simple way to immediately cool the Earth
Posted by: masthead
» Well said, masthead. n/m
Posted by: Paul_C
» RE: There is a cheap and simple way to immediately cool the Earth
Posted by: dobermanmacleod
» RE: A nuclear war will give us a massive cooling
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: johnwinthrop on Aug 17, 2009 1:52 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: common sense from the common man
Posted by: masthead
» Flash to Obama: You and Humans are Unimportant
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Flash to Obama: You and Humans are Unimportant
Posted by: pdxlinuxchix
» RE: common sense from the common man
Posted by: adp3d
» RE: engaging the climate change deniers
Posted by: cdlepthien
» RE: common sense from the common man
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: common sense from the common man
Posted by: ProfBob
» No hard evidence that every drunk driver kills. Or every heart attack. Or every cigarette.
Posted by: Beck
» Why is it
Posted by: Karlh
» cow farts ended it for me
Posted by: frantic1971
» No conflict of interest there .... n/m
Posted by: Paul_C
» Obama can make the Sun Stand Still: He's the Son of God
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» No, doofus, but we CAN stop the GHG's.
Posted by: Paul_C
» "Calendar year 2008 was the coolest year since 2000, according to the Goddard Institute..."
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» But it is also the ninth warmest year on record. You have ZERO scientific/math training.
Posted by: Paul_C
» You are Arrogant, Ignorant, And Offensive. You Personally Attack Everyone You Disagree With
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» You got me tony_opmoc, I have zero tolerance for liars and fools
Posted by: Paul_C
» RE:The hottest year was 1997 so recalibrate for that Tony
Posted by: Changling
» Idiot sense from the common idiot
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: common sense from the common man
Posted by: shellius
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Aug 17, 2009 3:58 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But you will not want to read it, because you do not have an open mind. You have already been converted to The Gospel of Saint Al Gore who with his rich friends in Wall Street are going to screw you blind - fixing nothing but ensuring your poverty.
From Amazon
"Air Con demonstrates, with hundreds of scientific references, that global warming was not, is not, and will not be a global crisis; that, even if per impossibile it might be, it is far more cost-effective to adapt as and if needed than to attempt to mitigate 'global warming' by cutting emissions of carbon dioxide; and that all attempts at mitigation would serve only to imprison the very poorest in their poverty, thereby perversely increasing world population and consequently the 'carbon footprint' of humankind, achieving an outcome precisely the opposite of that which was (however piously) intended.
The UN, Mikhail Gorbachev, Jacques Chirac, and other world-government wannabes are plotting to establish nothing less than a global, bureaucratic-centralist dictatorship under the pretext that it is necessary to 'Save The Planet'.
Ian Wishart's book demonstrates that there is not the slightest scientific reason for the new, quasi-religious belief that The Planet needs Saving. The new religion is merely an excuse for world government. World government will not, repeat not, be democratic government.
The 'global warming' debate is not really a debate about climatology - it is a debate about freedom. It is the aim of the growing world-government faction among the international classe politique to take away our hard-won freedom and democracy forever.
I commend this timely book, which makes the scientific arguments comprehensible to the layman. Those who read it will help to forestall the new Fascists and so to keep us free. --Lord Christopher Monckton, Viscount of Brenchley, former scientific advisor to Margaret Thatcher "
Video AIR CON: The Seriously Inconvenient Truth About Global Warming by Ian Wishart
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A Detailed Analysis of The Real Truth About Global Warming Can Be Found For $24.90
Posted by: adp3d
» RE: A Detailed Analysis of The Real Truth About Global Warming Can Be Found For $24.90
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: Wow, the same thing Limbaugh said in 1990
Posted by: Changling
» RE: Wow, the same thing Limbaugh said in 1990
Posted by: mandiwrite
» RE: A Detailed Analysis of The Real Truth About Global Warming Can Be Found For $24.90
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: A Detailed Analysis of The Real Truth About Global Warming Can Be Found For $24.90
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» Ian Wishart is a homophobic right wing extremist who doesn't believe in evolution
Posted by: Paul_C
» Personal Attack Is A Typical Response From Ignorant Climate Activists
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» Posting absolute garbage in the first place is typical troll behavior.
Posted by: Paul_C
» Lord Christopher Monckton, Viscount of Brenchley, former scientific advisor to Margaret Thatcher
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Tony, you wouldn't recognize
Posted by: cdlepthien
» RE: Remindes me of the Creationists who are also scientists
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beck on Aug 17, 2009 5:39 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyhow, the worst thing about these trips is that they reinforce the thinking that got us here: our fulfillment is not only the most important thing, compared to anything else, it's the only important thing. Try to talk about flying in groups of environmentalists and watch the conversation flounder. It doesn't with any other topic. But how can a person acknowledge something is truly harmful when they're simultaneously certain that they'd be a fool to give it up?
I read somewhere that two long flights is like driving a Hummer for a year.
Most of the needed changes that have happened started with a combination of personal change and pressure to change laws. We could all boycott air travel for a couple of years and force change.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Who Funds The Jollies For Thousands of Flights To Places Like Bali For "Environmentalists"?
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: Sure - the great left wing conspiracy
Posted by: cdlepthien
» Who are you talking about?
Posted by: leafsong1
» $79 Billion Spent and Counting: Still No Proof of AGW
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» Any idiot can read; understanding is something else.
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Sounds like you are talking about your "enviromentalists"
Posted by: Changling
» Sierra club was subverted by the DNC decades ago
Posted by: leafsong1
» So you have decided to go after enviromentalists as the cause of global warming, Beck?
Posted by: Paul_C
» RE: The reich wing are so prevelant in their propaganda
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Farmertim on Aug 17, 2009 5:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Not only that, look how fast out of the block they were, en masse!
Posted by: Paul_C
» or perhaps the Cap and Trade socialists have sent you
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar
» RE: Cap and Trade isn't a tax but a boon for corps(e)
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Aug 17, 2009 6:23 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Compassion and empathy are relatively new things. Employing logic and an appreciation for the abstract--i.e., what could, might, may happen in hundreds of years given X behavior by Y numbers of people in Z locations--is a brand-spanking new behavior, in geological time.
We're resourceful enough to perpetuate the species, I even suspect if that means building massive CO2 scrubbers, knookyoulehr reactors, and living under a mountain for hundred (possibly a few thousand?) years. Maybe that will be long enough to give the* species a fresh start.
No, while I retain some hope that the greatest alarmist are practicing more alchemy than science, that we have much more time than they scream at us, and that there are homeostatic systems in place that are unaccounted for, I suspect that every bit of cheaply available coal and oil will be spent. Initiatives to switch to more expensive options in "eco-morality" states will only indirectly subsidize they're being burnt in less "eco-moral" states.
Humans adapt well to scorching heat and terrible cold. We, and the things we depend on, don't often fare so well as pH swings to and fro.
*yeah, I know
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ZPZ. The answer is evolution.
Posted by: cdlepthien
» Quite missing the point.
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Quite missing the point.
Posted by: cdlepthien
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AJR Journal on Aug 17, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These "The End is Near!" articles on AlterNet are always good for a morning chuckle.
The "Hydrogen-Sulfide" extinction article is still the best of the bunch.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Catastrophic scenario? Don't make me laugh.
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» The corporate-whore/troll AJR Journal should be banned from Alternet
Posted by: Paul_C
» She hates trolls too.
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sharonsylvie on Aug 17, 2009 7:37 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: we have shallow news coverage everywhere
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: So just because the
Posted by: cdlepthien
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Aug 17, 2009 7:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BeyondBeliefs on Aug 17, 2009 8:26 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Size of Greed
Posted by: BeyondBeliefs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Aug 17, 2009 8:52 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But it seems to me that approaches like these and those developing in the ecology, geo-science and bio-science areas hold much in the way of promise. At the very least, they deserve serious and more widespread attention in our popular discussions.
I don't know about "last chances" like this article seems to emphasize, but I sure do agree that we are way, way behind in confronting a host of issues that have been suppressed and even denied as our current habits of living have been developing.
There are glimmers of light at least, if obscurantism, disorientation and all kinds of attempts to keep us in narrow and blind ways of living don't succeed in their intense efforts these days.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another way to look at the earth an all on it
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Aug 17, 2009 9:05 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pfm on Aug 17, 2009 9:32 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Might it be that “we” – that’s you and me – have seen so many articles, TV headlines, news flashes, blogs, books, movies claiming … LAST CHANCE … so as to make us immune…? We are literally inundated almost daily with yet another LAST CHANCE to the point where we merely tune out these words and all the information associated with it.
We do not need data or information to engulf us, we need data and information provided to us in a clear, concise, understand, full, open, honest, timely DISCLOSURE allowing us to sift and separate what for us is the wheat from the chaff giving us the means to arrive at our initial conclusion always subject to modification pending additional relevant input.
Respectfully submitted,
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Interesting, that is what the insurance industry is saying with regard to Health Care Reform
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BeyondBeliefs on Aug 17, 2009 9:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The North American Continent
Posted by: BeyondBeliefs
» Yea, first we ate all those dinosaurs then....
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar
» That is a strawman argument
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: QQOblivion on Aug 17, 2009 10:18 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My only regret is that the end will also come for many innocent species as well.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Goodbye, Nebulan
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar
» We sane people never heard of "Nebulans" - is that your little Troll fantasy world? n/m
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dudelette on Aug 17, 2009 10:26 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: badkitty on Aug 17, 2009 10:30 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MT512 on Aug 17, 2009 10:52 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Similarly, Al Gore continues to push his global warming stuff to... uh, sell his movie so he can make millions! Everybody knows the big bucks are in selling hard-to-swallow truths that suggest a need for lifestyle change!
See, "global warming" was invented solely to make a profit for a few "scientists" who have "studied" "facts" and "concluded" things based on "evidence." Bah!
On the other hand you have the just, noble old-energy companies and their industries' lobbying representatives who are innocent and pure and they are spending millions and millions of dollars just trying to defend themselves against the evil scientists whose lies are spread insidiously through subversive publications like "scientific journals".
Is is not obvious that when you have an issue with one side populated by experts potentially breaking even with book sales exposing the truths people don't want to hear, and the other side made up of huge multinational corporations that have billions and billions of dollars to lose if that information becomes accepted as truth... that the evildoers in such a situation are clearly the greedy, book-selling scientists?
After all, that's why most people become scientists--to make it rich off of esoteric technical publications read by tiny groups of similarly-specialized experts.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» HaHaHa! Wacko right wing conspiracy theories anyone? n/m
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 17, 2009 11:07 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have a people bubble, just as we had a credit bubble and still have the residue of a housing bubble. Bubbles lead to collapse, eventually. It's not a question of what, just when. It's easier to blame the msm than those who profit from the population explosion.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar on Aug 17, 2009 1:06 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These same people get rich from the effort, the movies , the books, the taxes , the politics.
When Al gives up his palacial estate and stops jetting around the world making money off this hype I will look into it.
But why would he, all he has to do is buy some carbon credits and all is forgiven. Under this program I suppose he could own some slaves too. If he had a WAMCO SLAVE CREDIT program.
Absolute rubbish.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Rove tactics on parade: Rule 13 - attack and villify the messenger.
Posted by: Paul_C
» RE: The global warming "myth" makes billions for its detractors
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Aug 17, 2009 3:04 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The answer is HELL NO!
We're easily the WORST thing that ever happened to Planet Earth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hughjones on Aug 17, 2009 3:16 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sweiger is going to save us with solar and wind. With subsidies, non-commercial contracts etc it is hard to estimate the potential of energy sources. One very basic means is to measure the energy in vs. the return on a project. We have already discovered that more energy goes into a corn to ethanol project than comes out. Similarly oil shale projects are only now getting positive energy out after a hundred years of research. Initially conventional oil yielded almost 20 times the energy that went into producing all the equipment and transporting equipment and product. Oil sands are in the range of 3 out for 1 in. Do solar and wind ever give back the power that goes into the building and operation? No one in those industries will discuss this simple relation.
Secondly there is positive feedback. That is rising temperature causes more H2O, CO2, methane etc. and rising H2O, CO2, methane etc. causes rising temperature. H2O is massively the most important and is purely driven by temperature. Methane is many times more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2 and it is being released from the tundra, from warming seas, rice farming and cattle farts. Ending anthropomorhic carbon emmissions won't stop any of this. We might delay the submergence of the Island Kingdom of Vanuatu by a day or two.
Seas will rise pushing populations into smaller areas, crops will fail.
But do not even mention that there may be too many humans. No! - fight against contraception and abortion, demand more babies in the West to fight our aging population, make it obvious how important children are by publicizing in-vitro fertilization and foreign adoption.
This way lies madness, chaos and starvation.
Hugh Jones Toronto Canada
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sweiger's non-solutions
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» That makes absolutely no sense - Part I
Posted by: Paul_C
» RE: That makes absolutely no sense - Part I
Posted by: hughjones
» That makes absolutely no sense - Part II
Posted by: Paul_C
» RE: That makes absolutely no sense - Part II
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: At least I agree with you
Posted by: cdlepthien
» RE: That makes absolutely no sense - Part II
Posted by: hughjones
» The DOE study is state-of-the-art and reliable. The solar plan is doable but does some projections
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sirios on Aug 17, 2009 9:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james_allen on Aug 18, 2009 3:37 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A problem is that this does not solve all problems. CO2 is increasing ocean acidity and thus degrading its ecology, but cooling wouldn't remove CO2 from the air or ocean. There are other reasons why man-made "cooling" would be, at best, a short-term stopgap.
Reading some of the anti-science comments reinforces what to me is a major difference between America's "left" and "right". The former believes in science and reason; the latter seeks out lies that fit their emotions.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Global cooling
Posted by: cdlepthien
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EddDoerr on Aug 18, 2009 12:49 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hughjones on Aug 18, 2009 2:33 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hugh Jones
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Big risks - it could cause massive dead zones and who knows what else
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: John_Birch on Aug 18, 2009 10:08 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Average Joe: Um, actually, the thermometer’s barely moved.
Environmentalist: Fool! Only scientists can read a thermometer! If you weren’t an idiot you’d know that!
Average Joe: In fact, it’s going down a little.
Environmentalist: That’s just more evidence its going up, you homophobic right wing extremist!
Average Joe: Maybe I should buy a meal for those poor folks next door instead.
Environmentalist: Whore! Troll! Oil company stooge! Thou deservest to be silenced!
Average Joe: Hey kids! How about some McDonalds?
Kids: Not if HE comes along...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You can feel the warmth of the steamer ....
Posted by: DaBear
» WAIT WAIT LEMME GUESS
Posted by: CAPSLOCK_AVENGER
» You captured the perspective of a 5 year old. However, you need to be over 13 to post here. n/m
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Changling on Aug 19, 2009 9:29 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That cooling of which you speak is relative to the hottest year on record which was 1997--all the other years are still the hottest recorded. But truly 2008 was cooler next to 1997 but not overall. Do you see the difference?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Aug 19, 2009 9:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyway, the FD horseshit ain't all it's cracked up to be in hindsight. Nostalgia is a pathetic substitute for truth. FD is what gave rise to rampant false binarism in Amerikaaner "journalism" and actually contributed to its ultimate demise under media consolidation and corporatism.
Don't put on the rose colored glasses, they won't make the shit stink any less.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CAPSLOCK_AVENGER on Aug 20, 2009 5:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: boay on Aug 23, 2009 8:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nike Dunk on Aug 23, 2009 10:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fredibach on Aug 29, 2009 2:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He was spotted at a fair in Santa Clarita. He recently emerged from the Social Security office on Olympic Boulevard. He tapped away on a computer at the library in Mar Vista. Warnings have gone out best web hosting reseller. Signs have been posted.
And yet unlike convicted sex offenders, who are required to stay away from places that cater to children, in this case the police can do next to nothing, because this man, Jack McClellan, who has had Web sites detailing how and where he likes to troll for children, appears to be doing nothing illegal ecommerce web host.
But his mere presence in Los Angeles — coupled with Mr. McClellan’s commitment to exhibitionistic blogging about his thoughts on little girls — has set parents on edge. One group of mothers, whose members by and large have never met before, will soon band together in a coffee shop to hammer out plans to push lawmakers in Sacramento to legislate Mr. McClellan out of business.
“Just the idea that this person could get away with what he was doing and no one could press charges has made me angry,” said Jane Thompson, a stay-at-home mother in East Los Angeles who recently read Mr. McClellan’s comments about a festival in her neighborhood in which he seemed to be describing her child.
Ms. Thompson is part of a movement to make it illegal to post images of children of any type on Web sites with sexual content or themes low cost web hosting. “It became what I call a minor obsession of mine for the next six weeks,” she said, “to get to know his crowd and the things they talk about.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mjx729 on Aug 31, 2009 8:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shellius on Sep 2, 2009 2:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ForwardProgress on Sep 3, 2009 4:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author, Larry J. Schweiger, weaves his journey through life through the three major parts of his book, and makes the case based on his own ethics. “Global warming will harm children on the right as well as those on the left,” he writes. And then he tells readers what to do about it.
“Last Chance” is an excellent contemporary read on the impact of politics on our science, all in a human-sized proportion. It’s about what’s going at levels greater than the reader, but, even more important, the author gives give readers a role to play. We know there are problems, but don’t quite know how to respond. This book is a great guide to our personal response. It includes sections called, “What You Can Do,” loaded with practical, do-able actions that anyone – a child, parent or grand-parent -- can take.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dobermanmacleod on Aug 17, 2009 12:39 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mankind probably(inadvertently) changed the climate thousands of years ago with slash and burn agriculture, maintaining the historically unusually hospitable climate period called the "Holocene." Furthermore, mankind's short-lived sun dimming pollution is probably cooling us down right now about 1C (a phenomena Dr James Lovelock has named a "fool's climate").
While a agree with the author that we are headed toward a climate catastrophe, and also that the media has done us a disservice by not informing us properly about the current trajectory, it is myopic to think mankind is just going to sit around and let our Earth go into a hot state like 55 millions years (the PETM) when most life died.
"The alternative (to geoengineering) is the acceptance of a massive natural cull of humanity and a return to an Earth that freely regulates itself but in the hot state." --Dr James Lovelock, August 2008
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There is a cheap and simple way to immediately cool the Earth
Posted by: masthead
» Well said, masthead. n/m
Posted by: Paul_C
» RE: There is a cheap and simple way to immediately cool the Earth
Posted by: dobermanmacleod
» RE: A nuclear war will give us a massive cooling
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: johnwinthrop on Aug 17, 2009 1:52 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: common sense from the common man
Posted by: masthead
» Flash to Obama: You and Humans are Unimportant
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: Flash to Obama: You and Humans are Unimportant
Posted by: pdxlinuxchix
» RE: common sense from the common man
Posted by: adp3d
» RE: engaging the climate change deniers
Posted by: cdlepthien
» RE: common sense from the common man
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: common sense from the common man
Posted by: ProfBob
» No hard evidence that every drunk driver kills. Or every heart attack. Or every cigarette.
Posted by: Beck
» Why is it
Posted by: Karlh
» cow farts ended it for me
Posted by: frantic1971
» No conflict of interest there .... n/m
Posted by: Paul_C
» Obama can make the Sun Stand Still: He's the Son of God
Posted by: johnwinthrop
» No, doofus, but we CAN stop the GHG's.
Posted by: Paul_C
» "Calendar year 2008 was the coolest year since 2000, according to the Goddard Institute..."
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» But it is also the ninth warmest year on record. You have ZERO scientific/math training.
Posted by: Paul_C
» You are Arrogant, Ignorant, And Offensive. You Personally Attack Everyone You Disagree With
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» You got me tony_opmoc, I have zero tolerance for liars and fools
Posted by: Paul_C
» RE:The hottest year was 1997 so recalibrate for that Tony
Posted by: Changling
» Idiot sense from the common idiot
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: common sense from the common man
Posted by: shellius
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Aug 17, 2009 3:58 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But you will not want to read it, because you do not have an open mind. You have already been converted to The Gospel of Saint Al Gore who with his rich friends in Wall Street are going to screw you blind - fixing nothing but ensuring your poverty.
From Amazon
"Air Con demonstrates, with hundreds of scientific references, that global warming was not, is not, and will not be a global crisis; that, even if per impossibile it might be, it is far more cost-effective to adapt as and if needed than to attempt to mitigate 'global warming' by cutting emissions of carbon dioxide; and that all attempts at mitigation would serve only to imprison the very poorest in their poverty, thereby perversely increasing world population and consequently the 'carbon footprint' of humankind, achieving an outcome precisely the opposite of that which was (however piously) intended.
The UN, Mikhail Gorbachev, Jacques Chirac, and other world-government wannabes are plotting to establish nothing less than a global, bureaucratic-centralist dictatorship under the pretext that it is necessary to 'Save The Planet'.
Ian Wishart's book demonstrates that there is not the slightest scientific reason for the new, quasi-religious belief that The Planet needs Saving. The new religion is merely an excuse for world government. World government will not, repeat not, be democratic government.
The 'global warming' debate is not really a debate about climatology - it is a debate about freedom. It is the aim of the growing world-government faction among the international classe politique to take away our hard-won freedom and democracy forever.
I commend this timely book, which makes the scientific arguments comprehensible to the layman. Those who read it will help to forestall the new Fascists and so to keep us free. --Lord Christopher Monckton, Viscount of Brenchley, former scientific advisor to Margaret Thatcher "
Video AIR CON: The Seriously Inconvenient Truth About Global Warming by Ian Wishart
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A Detailed Analysis of The Real Truth About Global Warming Can Be Found For $24.90
Posted by: adp3d
» RE: A Detailed Analysis of The Real Truth About Global Warming Can Be Found For $24.90
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: Wow, the same thing Limbaugh said in 1990
Posted by: Changling
» RE: Wow, the same thing Limbaugh said in 1990
Posted by: mandiwrite
» RE: A Detailed Analysis of The Real Truth About Global Warming Can Be Found For $24.90
Posted by: Tweck9
» RE: A Detailed Analysis of The Real Truth About Global Warming Can Be Found For $24.90
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» Ian Wishart is a homophobic right wing extremist who doesn't believe in evolution
Posted by: Paul_C
» Personal Attack Is A Typical Response From Ignorant Climate Activists
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» Posting absolute garbage in the first place is typical troll behavior.
Posted by: Paul_C
» Lord Christopher Monckton, Viscount of Brenchley, former scientific advisor to Margaret Thatcher
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Tony, you wouldn't recognize
Posted by: cdlepthien
» RE: Remindes me of the Creationists who are also scientists
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beck on Aug 17, 2009 5:39 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyhow, the worst thing about these trips is that they reinforce the thinking that got us here: our fulfillment is not only the most important thing, compared to anything else, it's the only important thing. Try to talk about flying in groups of environmentalists and watch the conversation flounder. It doesn't with any other topic. But how can a person acknowledge something is truly harmful when they're simultaneously certain that they'd be a fool to give it up?
I read somewhere that two long flights is like driving a Hummer for a year.
Most of the needed changes that have happened started with a combination of personal change and pressure to change laws. We could all boycott air travel for a couple of years and force change.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Who Funds The Jollies For Thousands of Flights To Places Like Bali For "Environmentalists"?
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: Sure - the great left wing conspiracy
Posted by: cdlepthien
» Who are you talking about?
Posted by: leafsong1
» $79 Billion Spent and Counting: Still No Proof of AGW
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» Any idiot can read; understanding is something else.
Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Sounds like you are talking about your "enviromentalists"
Posted by: Changling
» Sierra club was subverted by the DNC decades ago
Posted by: leafsong1
» So you have decided to go after enviromentalists as the cause of global warming, Beck?
Posted by: Paul_C
» RE: The reich wing are so prevelant in their propaganda
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Farmertim on Aug 17, 2009 5:50 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Not only that, look how fast out of the block they were, en masse!
Posted by: Paul_C
» or perhaps the Cap and Trade socialists have sent you
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar
» RE: Cap and Trade isn't a tax but a boon for corps(e)
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Aug 17, 2009 6:23 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Compassion and empathy are relatively new things. Employing logic and an appreciation for the abstract--i.e., what could, might, may happen in hundreds of years given X behavior by Y numbers of people in Z locations--is a brand-spanking new behavior, in geological time.
We're resourceful enough to perpetuate the species, I even suspect if that means building massive CO2 scrubbers, knookyoulehr reactors, and living under a mountain for hundred (possibly a few thousand?) years. Maybe that will be long enough to give the* species a fresh start.
No, while I retain some hope that the greatest alarmist are practicing more alchemy than science, that we have much more time than they scream at us, and that there are homeostatic systems in place that are unaccounted for, I suspect that every bit of cheaply available coal and oil will be spent. Initiatives to switch to more expensive options in "eco-morality" states will only indirectly subsidize they're being burnt in less "eco-moral" states.
Humans adapt well to scorching heat and terrible cold. We, and the things we depend on, don't often fare so well as pH swings to and fro.
*yeah, I know
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ZPZ. The answer is evolution.
Posted by: cdlepthien
» Quite missing the point.
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Quite missing the point.
Posted by: cdlepthien
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AJR Journal on Aug 17, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These "The End is Near!" articles on AlterNet are always good for a morning chuckle.
The "Hydrogen-Sulfide" extinction article is still the best of the bunch.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Catastrophic scenario? Don't make me laugh.
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» The corporate-whore/troll AJR Journal should be banned from Alternet
Posted by: Paul_C
» She hates trolls too.
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sharonsylvie on Aug 17, 2009 7:37 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: we have shallow news coverage everywhere
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: So just because the
Posted by: cdlepthien
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mnstra on Aug 17, 2009 7:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BeyondBeliefs on Aug 17, 2009 8:26 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Size of Greed
Posted by: BeyondBeliefs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Aug 17, 2009 8:52 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But it seems to me that approaches like these and those developing in the ecology, geo-science and bio-science areas hold much in the way of promise. At the very least, they deserve serious and more widespread attention in our popular discussions.
I don't know about "last chances" like this article seems to emphasize, but I sure do agree that we are way, way behind in confronting a host of issues that have been suppressed and even denied as our current habits of living have been developing.
There are glimmers of light at least, if obscurantism, disorientation and all kinds of attempts to keep us in narrow and blind ways of living don't succeed in their intense efforts these days.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Another way to look at the earth an all on it
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Aug 17, 2009 9:05 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pfm on Aug 17, 2009 9:32 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Might it be that “we” – that’s you and me – have seen so many articles, TV headlines, news flashes, blogs, books, movies claiming … LAST CHANCE … so as to make us immune…? We are literally inundated almost daily with yet another LAST CHANCE to the point where we merely tune out these words and all the information associated with it.
We do not need data or information to engulf us, we need data and information provided to us in a clear, concise, understand, full, open, honest, timely DISCLOSURE allowing us to sift and separate what for us is the wheat from the chaff giving us the means to arrive at our initial conclusion always subject to modification pending additional relevant input.
Respectfully submitted,
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Interesting, that is what the insurance industry is saying with regard to Health Care Reform
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BeyondBeliefs on Aug 17, 2009 9:37 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The North American Continent
Posted by: BeyondBeliefs
» Yea, first we ate all those dinosaurs then....
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar
» That is a strawman argument
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: QQOblivion on Aug 17, 2009 10:18 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My only regret is that the end will also come for many innocent species as well.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Goodbye, Nebulan
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar
» We sane people never heard of "Nebulans" - is that your little Troll fantasy world? n/m
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dudelette on Aug 17, 2009 10:26 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: badkitty on Aug 17, 2009 10:30 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MT512 on Aug 17, 2009 10:52 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Similarly, Al Gore continues to push his global warming stuff to... uh, sell his movie so he can make millions! Everybody knows the big bucks are in selling hard-to-swallow truths that suggest a need for lifestyle change!
See, "global warming" was invented solely to make a profit for a few "scientists" who have "studied" "facts" and "concluded" things based on "evidence." Bah!
On the other hand you have the just, noble old-energy companies and their industries' lobbying representatives who are innocent and pure and they are spending millions and millions of dollars just trying to defend themselves against the evil scientists whose lies are spread insidiously through subversive publications like "scientific journals".
Is is not obvious that when you have an issue with one side populated by experts potentially breaking even with book sales exposing the truths people don't want to hear, and the other side made up of huge multinational corporations that have billions and billions of dollars to lose if that information becomes accepted as truth... that the evildoers in such a situation are clearly the greedy, book-selling scientists?
After all, that's why most people become scientists--to make it rich off of esoteric technical publications read by tiny groups of similarly-specialized experts.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» HaHaHa! Wacko right wing conspiracy theories anyone? n/m
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 17, 2009 11:07 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have a people bubble, just as we had a credit bubble and still have the residue of a housing bubble. Bubbles lead to collapse, eventually. It's not a question of what, just when. It's easier to blame the msm than those who profit from the population explosion.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Caleb Darkstar on Aug 17, 2009 1:06 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These same people get rich from the effort, the movies , the books, the taxes , the politics.
When Al gives up his palacial estate and stops jetting around the world making money off this hype I will look into it.
But why would he, all he has to do is buy some carbon credits and all is forgiven. Under this program I suppose he could own some slaves too. If he had a WAMCO SLAVE CREDIT program.
Absolute rubbish.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Rove tactics on parade: Rule 13 - attack and villify the messenger.
Posted by: Paul_C
» RE: The global warming "myth" makes billions for its detractors
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Aug 17, 2009 3:04 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The answer is HELL NO!
We're easily the WORST thing that ever happened to Planet Earth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hughjones on Aug 17, 2009 3:16 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sweiger is going to save us with solar and wind. With subsidies, non-commercial contracts etc it is hard to estimate the potential of energy sources. One very basic means is to measure the energy in vs. the return on a project. We have already discovered that more energy goes into a corn to ethanol project than comes out. Similarly oil shale projects are only now getting positive energy out after a hundred years of research. Initially conventional oil yielded almost 20 times the energy that went into producing all the equipment and transporting equipment and product. Oil sands are in the range of 3 out for 1 in. Do solar and wind ever give back the power that goes into the building and operation? No one in those industries will discuss this simple relation.
Secondly there is positive feedback. That is rising temperature causes more H2O, CO2, methane etc. and rising H2O, CO2, methane etc. causes rising temperature. H2O is massively the most important and is purely driven by temperature. Methane is many times more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2 and it is being released from the tundra, from warming seas, rice farming and cattle farts. Ending anthropomorhic carbon emmissions won't stop any of this. We might delay the submergence of the Island Kingdom of Vanuatu by a day or two.
Seas will rise pushing populations into smaller areas, crops will fail.
But do not even mention that there may be too many humans. No! - fight against contraception and abortion, demand more babies in the West to fight our aging population, make it obvious how important children are by publicizing in-vitro fertilization and foreign adoption.
This way lies madness, chaos and starvation.
Hugh Jones Toronto Canada
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sweiger's non-solutions
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» That makes absolutely no sense - Part I
Posted by: Paul_C
» RE: That makes absolutely no sense - Part I
Posted by: hughjones
» That makes absolutely no sense - Part II
Posted by: Paul_C
» RE: That makes absolutely no sense - Part II
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» RE: At least I agree with you
Posted by: cdlepthien
» RE: That makes absolutely no sense - Part II
Posted by: hughjones
» The DOE study is state-of-the-art and reliable. The solar plan is doable but does some projections
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sirios on Aug 17, 2009 9:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james_allen on Aug 18, 2009 3:37 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A problem is that this does not solve all problems. CO2 is increasing ocean acidity and thus degrading its ecology, but cooling wouldn't remove CO2 from the air or ocean. There are other reasons why man-made "cooling" would be, at best, a short-term stopgap.
Reading some of the anti-science comments reinforces what to me is a major difference between America's "left" and "right". The former believes in science and reason; the latter seeks out lies that fit their emotions.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Global cooling
Posted by: cdlepthien
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EddDoerr on Aug 18, 2009 12:49 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hughjones on Aug 18, 2009 2:33 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hugh Jones
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Big risks - it could cause massive dead zones and who knows what else
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: John_Birch on Aug 18, 2009 10:08 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Average Joe: Um, actually, the thermometer’s barely moved.
Environmentalist: Fool! Only scientists can read a thermometer! If you weren’t an idiot you’d know that!
Average Joe: In fact, it’s going down a little.
Environmentalist: That’s just more evidence its going up, you homophobic right wing extremist!
Average Joe: Maybe I should buy a meal for those poor folks next door instead.
Environmentalist: Whore! Troll! Oil company stooge! Thou deservest to be silenced!
Average Joe: Hey kids! How about some McDonalds?
Kids: Not if HE comes along...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: You can feel the warmth of the steamer ....
Posted by: DaBear
» WAIT WAIT LEMME GUESS
Posted by: CAPSLOCK_AVENGER
» You captured the perspective of a 5 year old. However, you need to be over 13 to post here. n/m
Posted by: Paul_C
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Changling on Aug 19, 2009 9:29 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That cooling of which you speak is relative to the hottest year on record which was 1997--all the other years are still the hottest recorded. But truly 2008 was cooler next to 1997 but not overall. Do you see the difference?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Aug 19, 2009 9:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyway, the FD horseshit ain't all it's cracked up to be in hindsight. Nostalgia is a pathetic substitute for truth. FD is what gave rise to rampant false binarism in Amerikaaner "journalism" and actually contributed to its ultimate demise under media consolidation and corporatism.
Don't put on the rose colored glasses, they won't make the shit stink any less.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CAPSLOCK_AVENGER on Aug 20, 2009 5:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: boay on Aug 23, 2009 8:23 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Nike Dunk on Aug 23, 2009 10:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fredibach on Aug 29, 2009 2:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He was spotted at a fair in Santa Clarita. He recently emerged from the Social Security office on Olympic Boulevard. He tapped away on a computer at the library in Mar Vista. Warnings have gone out best web hosting reseller. Signs have been posted.
And yet unlike convicted sex offenders, who are required to stay away from places that cater to children, in this case the police can do next to nothing, because this man, Jack McClellan, who has had Web sites detailing how and where he likes to troll for children, appears to be doing nothing illegal ecommerce web host.
But his mere presence in Los Angeles — coupled with Mr. McClellan’s commitment to exhibitionistic blogging about his thoughts on little girls — has set parents on edge. One group of mothers, whose members by and large have never met before, will soon band together in a coffee shop to hammer out plans to push lawmakers in Sacramento to legislate Mr. McClellan out of business.
“Just the idea that this person could get away with what he was doing and no one could press charges has made me angry,” said Jane Thompson, a stay-at-home mother in East Los Angeles who recently read Mr. McClellan’s comments about a festival in her neighborhood in which he seemed to be describing her child.
Ms. Thompson is part of a movement to make it illegal to post images of children of any type on Web sites with sexual content or themes low cost web hosting. “It became what I call a minor obsession of mine for the next six weeks,” she said, “to get to know his crowd and the things they talk about.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mjx729 on Aug 31, 2009 8:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shellius on Sep 2, 2009 2:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ForwardProgress on Sep 3, 2009 4:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author, Larry J. Schweiger, weaves his journey through life through the three major parts of his book, and makes the case based on his own ethics. “Global warming will harm children on the right as well as those on the left,” he writes. And then he tells readers what to do about it.
“Last Chance” is an excellent contemporary read on the impact of politics on our science, all in a human-sized proportion. It’s about what’s going at levels greater than the reader, but, even more important, the author gives give readers a role to play. We know there are problems, but don’t quite know how to respond. This book is a great guide to our personal response. It includes sections called, “What You Can Do,” loaded with practical, do-able actions that anyone – a child, parent or grand-parent -- can take.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Half-Naked Hot Chicks and Beer: The Sexist Guyland of the Super Bowl Beer Commercial
Can Obama and Dems Overcome the Right's Talk Radio Monopoly?
Why We're Addicted to Disaster Porn




