Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Politico and the Washington Post Have Become Virtual "Escort Services" for Moneyed Elites

Raw Story. Posted July 17, 2009.


More and more mainstream media are brokering cozy relationships between politicians and lobbyists.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The various elite Washington news organizations that have become caught up in the so-called "pay-for-play” or "salon” scandal have now commenced a circular firing squad of sorts -- in an effort to distance themselves from their peers whose conduct they are trying to paint as worse than their own.

That was evident as the editor-in-chief of the Politico called the Washington Post an "escort service” in response to allegations that it also had too cozy relationships with politicians and lobbyists.

It was Politico that originally broke the story of the Washington Post’s attempt to raise money with "salons” at the home of its publisher.

As Ken Silverstein first disclosed on Harper’s website Tuesday, "Politico itself is hardly virginal when it comes to the wall between reporting and chasing revenue.”

Silverstein uncovered evidence that last year, Politico "co-sponsored a party at the Democratic National Convention with the Glover Park Group, a top Washington lobbying and consulting firm.”

Silverstein posted "an excerpt from Politico’s rapturous coverage” of its party:

And then of course there was the Politico/Glover Park Group party. It seemed to be the hot ticket last night, spread over two different bars to accommodate over 1,000 RSVPs. And the line to get in most definitely was loooong. But not for Ashley Judd: She went straight upstairs to a VIP area. A quick glance at the bottom floor took in politicos and those they cover: Madeleine Albright, Joe Klein, MoveOn’s Eli Pariser, Obama spokesman Bill Burton (who was last seen sitting on a couch working on his laptop), Dan Pfeiffer and his wife Sarah Feinberg (Rahm Emanuel spokesgal Sarah Feinberg), Pelosi staffer Stacy Kerr, RNC spokesman Alex Conant, Washington lawyer Bob Barnett, former WH’er Dan Bartlett (talking to who could have been his younger brother due to the striking similarities, but was ABC’s Jonathan Karl), Time’s Rick Stengel, MSNBC spokesman Jeremy Bronson, MSNBC journos Dan Abrams -- clothes less tight this time -- and David Shuster, former HRC head honcho Howard Wolfson, CBS’s Jennifer Yuille, DeLay right-hand lady Shannon Flaherty, communications guy Peter Fenn, lawyer Don McKay, Reid staffer Rodell Mollineau and H’Wood type Danny Strong. Oh! And the heir to Taco Bell, Rob McKay.

Silverstein’s assessment of all of this was devastating: "This intermingling of celebrities, journalists, and politicians, courtesy of big lobbying money, suggests a cabal of insiders who don’t really care who pays for their partying.”

What was the reaction of John Harris, the editor-in-chief of Politico to the disclosures?

Harris bristled at the suggestion that anything he did was even remotely anything done by the Post, saying: "I strongly don’t accept your interpretation that the Post’s salon events and items you mentioned are equivalent in any way. These are essentially social events… I don’t want to be name-calling with the Post, which I’m admirer of. What troubled me about the salons is that you had it advertising itself as an escort service.”

This isn’t the first time Politico has been caught engaging in this type of activity: Last October, Salon’s Glenn Greenwald wrote about the "cozy relationship” one of its top political writers enjoys with a right-wing operative.

Harris’s response was similar to how David Bradley, the owner of Atlantic, reacted, after it was reported that his magazine had also been the broker for elite "salons” for the city’s lobbyists and politicians

Bradley bristled, too, at the comparison of the salons he ran to those by the Post:

Earnest being my strong suit, I don’t know that I ever have stir-the-world words in me….So as to a topic suddenly in our Washington news, I will go for direct instead.  As there is no secret here, you may know much of this detail already.  Even so, I think it is right that these words come from me directly, over my signature (if that image still pertains).

For a half dozen years, Atlantic Media has been hosting sponsored salon dinners in Washington and around the U.S.  I don’t believe that any one of these events had any of the ill intention or effect that some have attributed to The Washington Post concept. But we live on a street too close to the brush fire to pretend no interest.  So what I thought I might do is give the detail of the Atlantic Media dinners, address some of the concerns I’m reading now on the Web, explain the virtue I see in this work and end with a personal statement and caveat.  Please forgive me if this runs long.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: media, journalism, lobbyists, lobbyists, politico, washington post, harpers, atlantic, pay for play

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Descent into madness.
Posted by: grindermonkey on Jul 17, 2009 3:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No issue can be presented by the media without the inherent bias of elitism. Elitism with its effete snobbery sells. From herpes to 9-11 it is all being compacted into nothing. It is about the medium and its ability to sell snake oil. A box with blinking lights. Video pornography, national stasis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eliot Spitzer got busted for this
Posted by: johnwinthrop on Jul 17, 2009 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are a lot of places on your body you can get screwed. Spitzer didn't have a call girl as sophisticated as Ms. Weymouth and her DC society elite. Yet he is bounced from the elite, and the journalists and the corporate lawyers and lobbyists party away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Obama had even a modicum
Posted by: weathered on Jul 17, 2009 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of sincerity he'd appoint Spitzer as a special prosecutor to inflict pain on the greed-ful few who w/impunity piss all over the many.

The audacity of hope is a phony slight of hand.
All carefully choreographed w/the energy of a hollywood production.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's a gap to fill with real journalism
Posted by: james108 on Jul 17, 2009 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this leaves a gap for a real, true independent paper. Sure, there'll always be bias. The big problem is most papers live in a virtual reality sandbox where there are things they just won't discuss.
Their omissions paint a lie. A real paper that tackled issues without adhering to the democratic/republican sandbox of approved elite approved topics would have quite a market I think. Who's the real market for a paper, people or corporations? One reason they're going under is their news is hardly worth buying, as sanitized as it is for corporate consumption.

For serious news, they could discuss the oil pipeline project in Afghanistan that was stalled due to Taliban negotiation issues but was restarted right after the invasion. You would think in a real paper on world events there would be question of whether we want to send our men, women and children to murder and be murdered to give certain corporations control over a Central Asian oil pipeline. It's not even for America, it's so they can sell oil to Central Asian markets. They said it wasn't motivation because it wasn't feasible, yet billions were poured into it a year later. We could discuss if the Iraq war and the millions spent to destabilize Iran's government have anything to do with oil while we're on the topic... Whether oil's the reason for certain decisions or not, it's so strange that our "real news" never discusses geopolitical resource positioning, as if we are in the middle east only to spread democracy, and always have been. How can it get away not mentioning our actual reason for being in the region in the first place, and survive as "news"?

For the entertainment section, they could mention (without all the racism and right wing calls), that the birth certificate Obama posted by Obama's campaign wasn't real. It couldn't have been. "African" wasn't a race on birth certificates until the late 60's. People in that time had negro or coloured and other things listed on their certificates until the push in the late 60's for African pride. There was no such thing as a legal "African American" in 61, unless he was the first and others didn't catch on for almost 10 years. OK, so it was also in laser font, and was a current print, which is OK, but why did he request the records sealed and when and why did he change his racial designation? He's the one that made it interesting. I didn't care if he was a citizen or not, and just want to know what he was hiding and why he paid almost a million in legal fees to keep the originals sealed before posting this copy online. Maybe we can get a revote and get Nader in there or at least bring the peace and progressive movements back to life and get some demands on this cat :)

Maybe it's a good thing, but the Internet just doesn't have the perceived credibility of the printed paper these days. People know they have to do their own research when they hear something on the web. They should know that with the printed press too, since what's left out can change the whole picture, but many trust established papers more. It seems as soon as many get popular they get co-opted though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is funny, coming from Alternet
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Jul 17, 2009 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets see...

Who funds Alternet?

Oh yeah. Moneyed elites. The Ford Foundation, George Soros, Rockefeller, the Packards among others.

Fret not dear readers. All of this is done out of the goodwill of these robber baron's hearts. You are, after all, far too ignorant to form your own opinions. They will gladly provide them for you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The 4th Estate was killed on 9/11
Posted by: weathered on Jul 17, 2009 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and integrity went up in smoke.

Just look at the NYtimes, a media vector for the self-indulged, the intellectually pretentious and the vain.

Nice job at the WTC, Silverstein thanks you:all the Lies fit to print.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rgd
Posted by: rgd on Jul 17, 2009 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it Alternet is behind it's readers when it comes to information. The staff must read our comments then decide what to write in the next issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» rgd - I'm ok with that Posted by: james108
» RE: rgd - I'm ok with that Posted by: weathered
Im grateful to AlterNet
Posted by: weathered on Jul 17, 2009 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
while we have this insatiable thirst for more truth, no one source has the monopoly - AlterNet does the best it can and its quite good, so my glass remains 1/2 full.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Matt Wuerker
Posted by: mcwuerker on Jul 17, 2009 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been following this coverage and I know it's self serving for me to defend Politico,my employer, but I think Harris is right to point out the difference between closed, off the record salons and parties that are open and anyone can write about. There's a serious and meaningful difference.

I'm not saying that these waters are not murky, but I also think it's safe to say it's always been thus. Journalists need to develop relationships and sources in order to break stories and find out what's going on. I'd point to the story Politico just broke with something from an insider on the American Conservative Union selling it's voice to UPS for $2 million.

Politics is confused with sausage making for a reason. It's a messy business. Covering it effectively can get messy too. Raw Story should be clearer on the difference here between influence peddling and media organizations throwing parties at conventions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

billybookworm
Posted by: billybookworm on Jul 17, 2009 10:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ho Hum.
Tacky? Yes. Business as usual? Yes.
The local newspaper publisher hobnobs with the owner of 6 car dealerships, a major advertiser. The state slaps an injunction and huge fine on the dealer for a pattern of fraudulent practices. That is page 30 news, one paragraph. A consumer makes a complaint about a used car dealer, sole proprietorship. Not an advertiser. That is page 1 news with pictures.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JOJODSN
Posted by: itouch backup on Jul 21, 2009 8:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blu Ray Burner|||MTS Converter For Mac can easily convert MTS files to other popular video/audio formats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement