Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Right-Wing Prescription for Economic Recovery: Lionize the Rich and Demonize the Poor

By Dylan Headley, AlterNet. Posted July 11, 2009.


Wing-nut commentary about the crisis blames the victims. As if things weren't already bad enough.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

As if the fact of the world financial meltdown – which, one is told, is the worst since the Great Depression -- isn’t dreary enough, the steady stream of right-wing commentary about the crisis makes matters worse in the salt-in-the-wound sense that it, typically, blames the victims, lionizes the villains, attempts to deflect blame from the criminals and proffers that the greed that totally poisoned the system in the first place is in fact the answer to all our problems.

Take, for instance, Ross Douthat, a young conservative pundit whose white, privileged, Harvard-educated, East Coast Money pedigree makes him uniquely qualified to lecture the lower classes on how to behave. He advises the mopey, repressed, upper-middle "creative" class to swing, baby. But he tells the irresponsible rabble of the lower orders, on the other hand, to chill: 

Our meritocrats [sic] could stand to leaven their careerism with a little more romantic excess. (Though such excess is more appropriate in the young, it should be emphasized, than in middle-aged essayists and parents.) But most Americans, particularly those of modest means, would benefit from greater caution and stability in their romantic entanglements.

For their own good, of course. Satisfying Douthat's own priggish sense of morality has nothing to do with it. Nothing. Neither does the right-wing, lizard-brained, shorthand of promiscuous poor people = more poor babies = more welfare = higher taxes have anything to do with it.

Actually, this may truly not have anything to do with it for Douthat, whose foremost pleasure in life seems to be scolding people about sex, but it does have something to do with it for the right-wingers who, when they say "liberty" and "freedom" actually mean "the right to economic sociopathy."

Actually, forget the "liberty" and "freedom" euphemisms wingnuts smear on their dented and creased vehicles of propaganda like so much Bondo. Why not? Francis Cianfrocca certainly forgets such safe and traditional (and mendacious to the point of Orwellian) euphemisms and goes for the gusto: Greed is goo -- well, screw it, this is better left in his own words, which read like Ayn Rand's "The Virtue of Selfishness" translated into middlebrow douchebagese: 

[T]he United States under Barack Obama may be taking a hatchet to a pillar of the American social contract, which is that Americans should be free of encumbrance in their pursuit of private wealth.

Thus the social contract is defined by one of those people who believes there "is no such thing as society." I especially like Cianfrocca's disingenuous quoting of Lincoln, who was in reality about as much a laissez-faire man as he was a Confederate.

Next we have David Frum, whose idea of proper financial reform is making sure that Good People (you guessed it, the filthy rich) have access to ample credit but Bad People (riiight) have access to little or none of it:

[B]y expanding government regulatory power, the Obama administration may invite innovation-thwarting meddling. Back in the 1990s, entrepreneurs used to say that America was the only country on earth where you could borrow $100 million without owning a suit. That's the thing we need to defend. What we need to end is the ability to borrow $100,000 without a down payment.

Obviously for the wingnuts, if there is to be regulation, then it should be of the peons. Or as Huey Long, coming from an entirely different direction, threatened those usually cronyist Louisiana pols hesitant to accept his largesse: Be on my side, or you will enjoy Good Government.

At least Ol' Huey was threatening to sock it to mostly the right people. Wingnuts, like their patron saint Rand, think the most pernicious folktale in history is Robin Hood and agitate accordingly: government, if it is to take sides, must support, in A. Hamilton's phrase updated however you like, "the rich and well-born."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: regulation, economic meltdown, right-wing pundits, class warfare

Dylan Headley is a flag-incinerating moonbat who lives in a corrugated tin shack in the South; he blogs as HTML Mencken at Sadly, No!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And yet even some of the so-called "liberals" and "progressives" support this too.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Jul 11, 2009 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until the electorate votes on the issues and not on the "left vs right" crap as usual, nothing will change. Ask the Obamabots to defend the Blue Dog Democrats in both the House and Senate and they'll either go mute or try to invent some baloney on "they have to be centrist". Being centrist doesn't have to mean selling one's soul to the devil. It's too bad that in a society where Mammon rules, most people put monied elites over princpled individuals for office. Obama's so-called stimulus package is very little different from Dubya's and as long as Obama and the Democrats would much rather give higher priority to war spending and bailouts for Wall $treet and yet lie about there not being money for true health care reform, repairing our public transportation system, and other domestic issues, then both sides are guilty ! Glad to be an independent and glad I voted thrice for Nader !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A question for Jennifer Posted by: pelican beak
» Still waiting for Jennifer Posted by: pelican beak
» GOD IS PUNISHING YOU MR PELICAN BEAK !! Posted by: superfeduphoosier
» Typical desperate Obamatalk. Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: Typical desperate Obamatalk. Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: Typical desperate Obamatalk. Posted by: pelican beak
It has ever been thus.
Posted by: Midway54 on Jul 11, 2009 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is nothing new under the Sun, as the phrase goes. It is everwhere in the histories of labor, politics, and law: The Plutocrats must have unfettered, aggressive means to accumulate as much property and wealth as they can and to which they see themselves entitled without such burdensome things as taxes or labor unions.
Any resistance or dissent from the rabble trying to survive under the sacred laissez-faire system of the plutocracy must be met and neutralized by legal enforcement and even military action where necessary.

One of the very best, highly researched books covering the whole survey of the struggles between rich and poor and the involvement of the branches of State and Federal governments is The Lost World of Classical Legal Thought, by Professor William Wiecek. a notable legal historian. It is used in law school courses.
Its subtitle is Law & Ideology in America 1886-1937. (Oxford University Press, 1998).

We need only watch the hearings by the Senate Judiciary Committee on the nomination of Sotomayor for the Supreme Court, and more specifically witness the ferocious bilge being spewed by the Stooges in the minority Plutocratic Party, aided and abetted by right winger nutcases on squawk radio and by the propagandists at the Fox Newstwister Channel, to convince us that the Plutocracy is alive and active.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It has ever been thus. Posted by: Benn_Miller
Soon the libertarian shit will hit the Ayn Rand
Posted by: sausage on Jul 11, 2009 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yesterday here at Alternet.org I opined on the Marie Cocco news story, Hundreds of Thousands of Workers Will Lose Unemployment Benefits Soon, ...every time I hear of a gaggle of stock brokers or insurance agents being laid off, downsized or outsourced, not a tear drop falls.

I knew as soon as I posted the above I was in for some mild opprobrium and I was not disappointed. However the strangest rebuke came from the regular Alternet poster johnwinthrop, a commentator of decidedly libertarian bent,"people take whatever work they can get. what do you want? People to starve? To that I replied:Amazing, now that the unemployment shoe is on the suburban, Caucasian Ayn Rand-cultist foot we must not let people starve. You can read the rest of my reply to johnwinthrop here.

The poison that Ayn Rand injected into America's economic and political circulatory system 65 years ago is in its tertiary stage. The patient may not pull through without radical therapy, yet our politicians and "mainstream" economists apply only the mildest of poultices.

The great economic guru of the last 20 years, former Federal Reserve chair Alan Greenspan, was an avowed Rand groupie in his salad days, being a regular visitor to her New York City ashram. And I am quite sure that more than one Wall Street "master of the universe" had a dog-eared copy of Atlas Shrugged on his dorm room bookshelf between to his paperback edition of conservative pop culture commentator Tom Wolfe's Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test and The Psychedelic Experience: A Manual Based on the Tibetan Book of the Dead by Baba Ram Dass(with Timothy Leary and Ralph Metzner).

With few exceptions modern American libertarianism/Ayn Rand cultism is a white, coordinator class, q.v. Eric Patton, dissidentvoice.org ,phenomena. Suburban white boys, whose only brush with real physical labor may have been selling shoes at the neighborhood mall, rail against the perceived laziness of blacks, Latinos and unwashed whites for resorting to welfare and food stamps, the lowest paying physically demanding menial jobs or inability to rise up out of poverty through the expedient of a "higher" education.

Glenn Beck, FoxNews' latest raging, lunatic asshole, went from the junior high classroom directly into the radio studio. Oh, how hard he worked! Our unlamented last president, George W. Bush, also falls into this category and like the above mentioned Beck when through bouts of alcohol and drug abuse followed by conversion to fundamentalist religion and Randianism.

Had Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin wanted to destroy capitalism they could not have found a better agent than Ayn Rand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bs
Posted by: dailykook79 on Jul 11, 2009 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If your gonna give government handouts ...hand out a job...or create a path to help them rise out of poverty.Welfare..and other big government programs were never intended to bring the poor out of troubled waters,but only to keep them afloat.It's like throwing a livesafer attached to rope to a drowning person and then dropping your end of the rope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Rbs Posted by: madregal
» RE: bs Posted by: RoyalM
» RE: bs Posted by: armorypk
FACT CHECK
Posted by: CLARENCE SWINNEY on Jul 11, 2009 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1946 to Reagan
Each Percentile increased almost evenly in Income and Wealth on a percent basis..

Economists called it Picket Fence Distribution

Reagan big Tax cuts for Rich started Step Ladder Distribution with each step gaining some but top ladder(10%) went to Mars.

Today top 10% own 71% of Total National Wealth.

Top 1% own 21%.

Bush was worse than Reagan in the redistribution.

The top 2.4% got four times the Tax Cut as lower 80%.

He did like Coolidge
Hands Off Wall Street--roll dem dice-
bet 4000 with 100 in pocket

ouch--snake eyes--uncle sam help us

The Middle Class has been decimated since 1973.

It shall get wurser.

Carter presented Reagan with 1000B of Debt and 600B Spending.

20 years of three conservative presidents--18 years Conservative Senate--12 years conservative House--6 years total Conservative control
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
and it is now 11,000B and 4000B.

two wars and second Great depression

Spin-Rationalize-Justify-Alibi-Excuse-Lie

It will not absolve them of the DIASTERS

We must tell the people. Over and Over and Over

TV-Internet-Papers-

1000 to 11000
600 to 4000

23M new jobs in 20 years

carter + clinton 33M in 12 years

will you help tell the people?

cswinney2@triad.rr.com
political research historian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Liberals are in charge, let's see what they can do.
Posted by: AJR Journal on Jul 11, 2009 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Higher minimum wage
Higher income taxes.
Carbon footprint tax,
Increased unionization with EFCA,
No expansion of free-trade agreements,
Increased government scrutiny and regulation,
That is just for starters, I am sure I forgot something.
This is no recipe for economic recovery, but it is a plan for continued political domination.
It is not about the economy, stupid!
It is about politics!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And all this is bad because??? Posted by: thekidde
» Tell your Mom I said "Hi" Posted by: AJR Journal
» RE: Tell your Mom I said "Hi" Posted by: Benn_Miller
I believe
Posted by: Archie1954 on Jul 11, 2009 9:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
everything this article says is the truth but I bring my desire for social justice down to a personal wish to live in a safe environment. The more socially egalitarian a society is the safer it is. One doesn't have to live in Copenhagen (capital of a socialist state)to be able to wander safely through the streets at night. One just has to ensure some level of social conscience within the institutions of the nation. The US is sadly lacking in that area. Past governments have been satisfied to let great wealth live side by side with terrible poverty. Such inequities create a timebomb of thwarted desires, one that might explode at any time. Why not work towards a fairer kind of society? Everyone would be a lot safer if you did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I believe Posted by: madregal
Again, pls. make a profit,
Posted by: weathered on Jul 11, 2009 11:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
don't be a fu-kin pig!

But that's exactly what we've got, swine dining at trough of greed,

For some greed is a selfish choice for others its in their DNA,.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is no right or left
Posted by: SamLowrey on Jul 11, 2009 12:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It isn't Right or Left, it is nationalism vs. globalism. If you like what globalism has done so far with exporting most of our jobs and manufacturing as well as wealth and importing massive amounts of 3rd world immigrants, then you will LOVE what they have planned in the future.

Read "The Creature from Jekyll Island."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exactly. Posted by: Benn_Miller
» RE: There is no right or left Posted by: weathered
So called "social ills" are the biopolitical strike.
Posted by: ismac76 on Jul 11, 2009 2:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course the rich and powerful want the people who do not share their advantage and it's ability to augment their avarice to live according to the means left for them.
The social safety nets only buy them time to prepare for a confrontation with the rest of life on earth.
Money and it's privilege of escaping from the problems of life on earth creates a vacuum in which the allocation of property leads to an artificial scarcity.
Those who live with this artificial scarcity could do one of two things. Pull themselves up by the bootstraps and join the ranks of self congratulating sociopaths for proving that their ethics or it's total lack thereof knows no class, no race, no gender.
Or perhaps when faced with the choice to behave as the ruling class dictates, one should honor the suffering of all life by doing everything they can not to participate in those schemes, to break it's flows of capital through usurpation and blind it's vigilant silent eyes everywhere they are found.
Drop out of school.
Drop out of work.
Don't subordinate yourself to the definitions of mental illness when it's only natural to react with emotional intensity to the world being ruined by these fucking scumbags.
Utilize social safety nets while they last.
Above all reclaim the knowledge of how to live, to provide basic means for yourself outside of the catastrophe of capitalism dictating the terms to you in a sterile box, individuated into meaninglessness & total alienation, amputated from the world.
We must be the weeds pushing through the cracks in the pavement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just another reason to NOT lump people into categories!!
Posted by: lmbfreespirit on Jul 11, 2009 4:31 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am soooooooooooo sick people putting people into "categories" People just ARE!!
I am a PROgressive liberal, to the extreme!
BUT, as a California native, I want our borders CLOSED! I am so sick of them coming here and eating up all of resources!
I was brain INJURED by a drunk driver 10 years ago! I was not able to get food stamps!!!!!!!!
After my mom stood in line amongst the stench, WE WERE DENIED!
I was a kindergarten teacher (teaching illegals children!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

larger, more precise words
Posted by: daphnechyprious on Jul 11, 2009 5:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
exist for a reason. Unfortunately, that reason is not Douthat's reason.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tischindelray
Posted by: Tischindelray on Jul 12, 2009 3:03 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take away the right of Houses of Worship to minister to the poor: Left wing proposal. Take away Bibles but allow the koran in prisons: Left wing proposal Stifle free speech that doesn't agree with president-for-life oblabla: Left wing proposal. Have government involved in every aspect of citizen's lives: Left wing proposal.
My question then becomes: When the government decides who is "needy" and who's not, will you Lefties step up to the plate and assist? Doubtful. A recent story on ABC TV confirmed that conservatives give about 30 percent more. And incidentally, conservative-headed families make slightly less money.

Facts suck, don't they?

The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.
- Patrick Henry, American patriot and orator (1736-1799)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Merchants are the super race
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jul 12, 2009 3:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A lively article with savory comments. Any flag-igniting moonbat is a friend of mine. :)

My take is that--somewhere back in the 80's--the right in America decided that Merchants are the super race.

It's as simple and as dumb as that. Nor should it surprise us that the people promulgating this philosophy just happened to be Merchant types. ;)

Until a few months ago, you had to genuflect when you said "deregulation." You had to bow when you said Free Trade.

The conservative/libertarian meme that business is better was almost literally tattooed onto our brains thorugh sheer repetition--odd behavior for a "liberal-controlled media." At the same time, we were assured over and over again that government is bad, and that government workers should be regarded with suspicion.

Maybe they should be made to wear armbands. Maybe childrenwho express an interest in going into government should be sent to therapy. Yea, that's the ticket!

What a healthy society it would be. We could all join together in mutual hatred of government...

As one commenter has noted, it was all Ayn Rand garbage: business good, government bad. The free market is the perfect system. Greed is good. Government should be run according to free market (music up) principles. The financial sector can be run according to the honor system.

Don't worry. Money will trickle down from Valhalla...eventually. All we need to do is dismantle the New Deal.

It was so bad, the Democratic leadership got dragged into the act and started acting like little Republicans. You all know the grisly details.

Now that it's all gone belly-up, everyone in America--with the notable exception of our Democratic leadership--has seen the folly of their ways. The business types, and those who identify them, are now consoling themselves by beating up on the plebs, who have realized not only that merchants are not the super race, but that government is the only solution to the problems we created by treating government as the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Cruddy Among Us Blame Obama
Posted by: Lilly on Jul 12, 2009 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is absolutely routine for posters to conservative townhall.com (where every article is followed by a Comments thread) to defend Corporate America and the very wealthy, although most of them write as if they are sitting out in front of their trailer, in their undershirt, swilling beer and worrying about how they are going to make their next Child Support payment eg "The debackle of moral intigerty have been given up in the name of mercy and grace" (TH 6-19-09, Patrick in TX). These people defend, tooth and nail, a free market that has stomped on them. They are (literally) ready to take up arms against Obama when he pushes initiatives that are in their interest. They blame the Bush years for nothing. And they believe (and spread news of) any manner of Obama-bashing; one posted the other day that Obama (whom they call names like Flap Ears and The Mulatto Messiah) is having swine flu designed and vaccines for it also designed so he can declare martial law and require vaccination at gunpoint, all in aid of his maniacal drive for power and control. Some of the Obama craziness is clearly racial (he's black) and some of it has to do with social issues (he's not anti-abortion) but I'd say most of it is about economics (he's stealing my wealth [only I don't have any, and that's his fault too]).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Cruddy Among Us Blame Obama Posted by: Steppin Razor
Perhaps the author would like to remind us who voted for the
Posted by: superfeduphoosier on Jul 12, 2009 6:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
700b bailout last year, more big government spending disguised as a "stimulus", expansion of war spending, and in general more fleecing of the war. This time, the blame does not go to the rightwing but to the DEMOCRATS ! BIG GOVERNMENT is the problem and we need to put more libertarians in power to SMASH BIG GOVERNMENT down to pinky size ! VOTE LIBERTARIAN AND BE PROUD !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lionize the poor and demonize the rich
Posted by: doctor on Jul 12, 2009 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't you mean Lionize the poor and demonize the rich. Isn't this what the leftist wing-nuts want to do.?

Leftist-democrat philosophy: Reward the lazy, do nothing, want everything (poor liberals: remeber the leberals from New orleans that came slithering out of Hurricane Katrina) and crucify the productive, job suppliers, earn everything (conservatives)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And you call yourself a "doctor" ? Posted by: Benn_Miller
The Patron Saint of the Freebooters: Adam Smith
Posted by: marid on Jul 12, 2009 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
had a lot to say about rich and poor that is conviently and consistently ignored by most of his accolytes. Take a look at just a few:

No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part of the members are poor and miserable.
"Oops they missed that one"

This is one of those cases in which the imagination is baffled by the facts.
"Facts are not Fair to the Rich"

To feel much for others and little for ourselves; to restrain our selfishness and exercise our benevolent affections, constitute the perfection of human nature.
"Darn poor Welfare takers" (Read "Free Lunch" by David Caye Johnston, if you need a blood pressure spike.)

With the greater part of rich people, the chief enjoyment of riches consists in the parade of riches.
"What dominates our News?"

That wealth and greatness are often regarded with the respect and admiration which are due only to wisdom and virtue; and that the contempt, of which vice and folly are the only proper objects, is often unjustly bestowed upon poverty and weakness, has been the complaint of moralists in all ages.
"Why do we worship them so?"

The Rich and Powerful own our govt. and its minions, control and own almost all major news outlets, influence the Supreme Court, distort and direct the religions, and just plain don't like it when common people get too uppity and expect something better from our country.

Until the average American of any and all races, creeds, and colors decides that we can do better we (that is most of us)will continue to slide down the hill to the Banana Republic we seem destined to become.

As Warren Buffet said, "There is class warfare, and my side is winning."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Huey Lang were alive today, he would neither be a Republican or Democrat.
Posted by: Benn_Miller on Jul 12, 2009 12:51 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looking at most Democrats today, Huey Lang would find it bizarre that they even call themselves Democrat when they should be in the Republican Party. What a sad and sorry status the Democratic Party has become. There is no room for a Huey Lang Democrat in the party today. I already regret my votes on Clinton, Gore, and Kerry the more I know about their historical voting records. Worse, bring up the truth about Obama and the Democrats and you get flamed at. Notice how the Obama koolaid drinkers never rebuttal the rightwing posts on this site. It's as if they do not know the issues or are afraid to admit that they actually support the same policies only because Obama's carrying them out as a Democrat. I can imagine Huey Lang getting flamed and shouted down by the Obama koolaid drinkers were he alive today and speaking against Obama's crimes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Put More Succinctly
Posted by: armorypk on Jul 12, 2009 10:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."

- James K. Galbraith

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The right idea!
Posted by: weslen1 on Jul 12, 2009 10:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On December 10, 1948 our leaders signed The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 25 reads,
(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and wellbeing of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

To this day, when a disaster strikes, anywhere in the world, representatives of the United States are the first ones there to offer assistance and to help in any way possible. Yet, when the most recent disasters occurred here at home, our government was MIA. And now that so many millions of jobs have been lost on Republican watch, their solution is to cut benefits for the unemployed, cut free school lunch programs to motivate hungry children, to cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. They pray for another 9/11 on a much grander scale to “Save the Republican Party”, they pray for the destruction of millions of people’s lives and call themselves the party of “morals”. Give me a break. They accuse the unemployed of being out of work “because they don’t understand the need to work or even why there is a need to work”. When it comes to helping Americans who are in trouble, our government is AWOL.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm glad none of you engage in personal attacks here
Posted by: halg on Jul 13, 2009 12:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm also glad I'm not participating! I'll bring you all flowers when you get to the recovery room.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ahh yes, the rulling US oligarchy
Posted by: bonapartist on Jul 13, 2009 12:55 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With their current mulatto pet/mouth in charge.

Kill them all and let the God sort them out?

A bit bloody but beats living like a slave, worst of all a slave whos slaveowner preaches on merits of how to be a proper underling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ahh yes, the rulling US oligarchy Posted by: TheNamelessCity
WILL THE INTERNATIONAL WORLD RESPOND TO THE CRIES FOR REAL JUSTICE IN AMERICA BY OUR POORER CITIZENS
Posted by: DOUGLASFIELD on Jul 14, 2009 3:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE SAD REALITY IS THAT POORER AMERICANS CAN RECEIVE THIS VERY NEEDED LEGAL FINANCING FROM THE INTERNATIONAL WORLD AND NOT THEIR OWN CARING AND LOVING DEMOCRATIC IVORY TOWER CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS OF THE FREE WORLD !!!


SOMEHOW OUR U.S. CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS OF THE FREE WORLD HAVE DECIDED AND APPROVED CURRENT LEGISLATION TO SPEND 50 BILLION AMERICAN TAX $$$ IN THE INTERNATIONAL FIGHT AGAINST AIDS OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS BEFORE TAKING CARE OF OUR OWN POORER AMERICANS HERE AT HOME FIRST !

MIDDLE CLASS AND WORKING POOR AMERICANS ARE UNABLE TO AFFORD PROPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN THEIR CIVIL,CRIMINAL AND FAMILY COURTS OF LAW ALL ACROSS AMERICA CAUSING TREMENDOUS HARDSHIPS NATIONWIDE,BUT THESE GREAT MINDS and callous hearts IN OUR AMERICAN CONGRESS HAVE FOUND OTHERS WORLDWIDE MORE NEEDY THEN THEIR OWN CITIZENS WHO ARE BEING FALSELY INCARCERATED,WRONGFULY EXECUTED,LOSING THEIR HOMES OR APARTMENTS,LOSING CHILD CUSTODY OR VISITATION WITH THEIR CHILDREN ETC...

NOT BEING AFFORDED PROPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION BY OUR U.S.CONGRESS HAS CREATED A TOTAL BREAKDOWN OF THE AMERICAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM FOR OUR POORER AMERICANS BECAUSE THE AMERICAN COURTS PUNISH ALL OF US LITTLE PEOPLE IF WE ARE NOT ASSISTED WITH PROPRER LEGAL COUNSEL.IT IS A KNOWN FACT THAT OUR AVERAGE MIDDLE CLASS AND WORKING POOR AMERICANS WITHOUT PROPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN ALL OF OUR AMERICAN COURTS OF LAW LOSE THEIR LEGAL CASES TO THE BETTER FINANCED WHO ARE ABLE TO AFFORD LAWYERS.


LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS IS NOW ACTIVELY IN THE HUNT FOR INTERNATIONAL COUNTRIES AND LEADERS WORLDWIDE TO HELP RAISE 5 BILLION DOLLAR$ FOR OUR SLIGHTED POORER AMERICANS WHO HAVE HAD THEIR OWN AMERICAN CONGRESS TURN THEIR BACKS ON THEIR DESPERATE NEEDS IN NOT AFFORDING THEM PROPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION.

TROY DAVIS AND MUMIA ABU - JAMAL ARE 2 PERFECT EXAMPLES OF AMERICAN CITIZENS WHO NEVER HAD PROPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AFFORDED THEM BY OUR U.S. CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS OF THE FREE WORLD IN THEIR INITIAL CRIMINAL TRIALS IN (GEORGIA AND PENNSYLVANIA) WHO MIGHT VERY WELL HAVE TO PAY THE ULTIMATE PRICE OF POSSIBLY BEING COMPLETELY INNOCENT AND FALSELY EXECUTED IN THE NEAR FUTURE.

THIS IS THE FIRST OF MANY WWW INTERNATIONAL PLEAS BY LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS FOR OTHER LEADERS AND COUNTRIES TO HELP RAISE THE NEEDED MONIE$ TO CORRECT THESE BLATANT INJUSTICES THAT HAVE BEEN INFLICTED ON POORER AMERICANS FOR THE LAST FEW DECADES.


LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS HAS MANY OTHER WRITTEN ARTICLES THAT CAN BE VIEWED WITH ANY WWW SEARCH ENGINE BY OUR NAME OR OUR TELEPHONE NUMBER.

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS IS A WWW LOBBY GROUP OF VOLUNTEERS THAT SING OUT ABOUT THE DECADES OLD NEGLECT,ABUSE AND INJUSTICES BEING INFLICTED ON OUR POORER AMERICANS THAT HAVE BECOME CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY ISSUES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL WORLD COURT TO INVESTIGATE.


lawyersforpooreramericans@yahoo.com
(424-247-2013)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CONGRESS: LIES AND COSTS
Posted by: reelman on Jul 15, 2009 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many times are we voters played for fools by the royal congress?

What was the “over run” on the “Big Dig” Teddy porkster? Wasn’t that at least 900% more TAX MONEY than congress told voters it would be?
How much more was the new congressional “Visitor’s Center”? Wasn’t that at least 300% more TAX MONEY than congress told voters it would be? What to talk about Medicare estimates and reality? Was that not at least 300% more TAX MONEY than voters were told it would be?
Now, the same lying track record clowns are telling voters (suckers) that the “health care reform” bill will cost (are you ready for this?)…
$1.5 trillion (repeat 1.5 trillion).

Based upon reality, the past lies or incompetency or both the sucker voters can expect in the so-called health care reform at least $4.5 trillion of new (borrowed from China again?) debt for a nation that is broke this very minute.
No, the “rich” cannot nearly cover the dozen trillion of new debt this administration has now for voters or wants in 2009 alone.

When the democrat tax and inflation waves start waterboarding your paycheck…remember this post…and the last election.

http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Economic Recovery?bad.
Posted by: itouch backup on Jul 15, 2009 8:28 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement