Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Jingoism Isn't Journalism: Why I Don't Trust Corporate Media on Iran

By Linda Milazzo, AlterNet. Posted June 25, 2009.


Why is corporate media so eager to cover the people's movement in Iran, but unwilling to cover the anti-war movement here?
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

As a critic of media, in particular of cable/satellite "news," I'm troubled by American corporate-media, in particular CNN's near non-stop coverage of the turmoil in Iran. Not because the story isn't important. It's critically important and warrants the personal coverage it's getting from the Iranian people as they bypass corporate channels to tell their stories on facebook, youtube, flickr and twitter.

Thanks to Iran's tech-savvy society, old-time corporate media is now relegated to the position of new-media aggregator, whoring its visibility to co-opt the Iranian people's new-media messages to America and the world. Old-media, and specifically CNN, are learning the difficult lesson that with or without their vast resources and state of the art studios, the Iranians' stories will be told. And they'll be told to tens of millions more viewers than cable and satellite programs tend to reach.

Despite CNN's attempt to co-opt the scope of new-media in the Iranian social justice movement and present it as a novel approach, social networking venues have been used by activists around the world to broadcast and document grassroots activities that corporate-media either buried or refused to report. Youtube and flickr have long been used by grassroots organizations in the United States and elsewhere to document and corroborate socio-political actions such as marches and rallies which opposed the Iraq war, Bush administration policies and corporate greed, but weren't in corporate-media's interest to cover since they challenged their power elite: their corporate advertisers and their government cronies.

As a participatory journalist who's been present at a multitude of marches and rallies that were spurned by corporate-media, I've consistently used new-media to document corporate-media ignored or buried events. Witness in this article written in August '08 during the Democratic National Convention, the baton bashing of a woman anti-war activist in Denver by a Colorado law enforcement officer that was virtually ignored by corporate-media.

For the past several years the anti-war movement has photographed for flickr and video'd for youtube the number of attendees at its events to counter the reckless underreporting by corporate controlled print and TV news. As reported by Indymedia, the St. Paul police routinely beat and arrested progressive protesters during the 2008 Republican National Convention in Minnesota when they protested the improprieties of their government, yet these events got little corporate-media coverage and no visible anchor sympathy was shown for the beaten. Instead, Americans who have challenged the policies of the US government have been mocked and overlooked by their own country's media, while those in other nations who challenge the leadership of non US allies like Iran, Argentina and Bolivia get enthusiastic coverage. The hypocrisy is astounding.

Why is corporate-media so willing to provide wall-to-wall coverage of the people's movement in Iran and graphic images of the Iranian government's brutality, but unwilling to cover the progressive anti-war movement in America and the police brutality here? Jingoism isn't journalism! Again, I don't mean to diminish the momentousness of the socio-political happenings in Iran, nor the valor of the Iranian people as they face off against their tyrannical government.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iran, media, cnn, protests, twitter

Linda Milazzo is a Los Angeles based writer, educator and activist. Since 1974, she has divided her time between the entertainment industry, government organizations & community development projects, and educational programs.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
why cover Iran and not anti-war?
Posted by: davidg on Jun 26, 2009 11:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because corporate media is part of the totalitarian capitalist system. It's not subtle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democracy Now
Posted by: nicejake on Jun 26, 2009 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are many examples of news and fact control. At the Minneapolis convemtion Amy Goodman and her crew were arrested, even though their press credentials were evident. They received no attention from MSM. Compare that to the two reporters that are being held by North Korea. Lot's of attention. North Korea bad they arrest reporters.

In another time news just had to break even, not make a profit. They looked to soap opera and comedy for their profits. It was expensive to have journalist stationed all over the world in case there was something newsworthy happening. Those journalist offered news daily and news editors made the decision as to what stories would be shown. Very often as to what proffessional deemed newsworth.

Actually, the new media plays right into the recent business plan of cable news. In recent years we have had a series of talking heads yelling at each other. That is a far cheaper format than to have crews all over the world. Twitter, Facebook, MySpace is even cheaper than that. People present at important events, upload pictures, audio and text in real time. The news factory picks off the pictures that are significant to their rating or politcal goals. ALL FOR FREE! What a deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Democracy Now Posted by: leonardfeingold
» RE: Democracy Now Posted by: Zeugitai
» RE: Democracy Now Posted by: lively56
Interesting alternative perspective on the new Iranian "revolution"
Posted by: eidolon on Jun 26, 2009 10:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me the elites have a stake in the Iranian opposition as well. The reality is that corporate media in the US is being way too optimistic about the protests. This whole thing reeks of toxic interventionism. The article linked below was also published in Alexander Cockburn's Counterpunch:
"What Actually Happened in the Iranian Presidential Election? A Hard Look at the Numbers"

Another illuminating article from the AFP:
US "Senators vow help for Iran dissidents"

On the other hand, Amy Goodman's article on this site about telecommunications companies aiding the crackdown of dissent in China and Iran makes a compelling argument for "elite" support of Ahmadinejad. It's a strange situation for strange times.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good article. The MSM is crap.
Posted by: highkarate on Jun 26, 2009 11:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great stuff. More original articles and links to help you understand how to combat disinformation and navigate the trenches of propaganda can be found @

jasondylan.wordpress.com

Peace!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Single-Out Iran?
Posted by: dumdumboy on Jun 27, 2009 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact is that the Corporate Media in this country is part of the establishment, and exists to present their view / side of the story to the public. It is finely-tuned propaganda.

What really enrages me is when the Corporate Media covers economics. Is there anyone on TV who makes less than 6-figures? So when they cover economic issues, who is there to represent us plebians, who only make 5-figures, especially us in the lower 5-figure range? We are, after all, the vast majority of the population, yet we are unheard; our views, experiences and travails are not expressed by one of our own in Corporate Media.

I'm not calling for a total boycott of Corporate Media, as it's important to know what the other side is thinking. But it should be taken with a huge block of salt, the salt of the earth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I know
Posted by: lalala on Jun 29, 2009 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its a spectator sport as long as its not taking place here... then they just pretend it doesnt exist... unless its sponsored by fox news that is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How radicals get their news
Posted by: Spot on Jun 30, 2009 7:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you were in the streets, you wouldn't have to wait for the news at 6.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement