Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Next on the Endangered Species List: Your Hometown Newspaper

By Benjamin Dangl, AlterNet. Posted June 18, 2009.


They ground us in a globalized world, and help define who and where we are.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

While reporting on various political events from Latin America in recent months I followed news from my hometown of Burlington, Vermont through the website of my weekly local paper, Seven Days.

I kept track of Burlington politics online from La Paz when Bolivia passed its new constitution, watched reportage on the opening of the local farmer's market when Paraguayan President Fernando Lugo was caught in a paternity suit, and followed Vermont's legalization of gay marriage via the paper's updates while Argentina commemorated the 33rd anniversary of a military coup.

The paper's website offered a portal to home, and underscored the importance of local newspapers in providing a sense of community. Local papers ground us in a globalized world, and help define who and where we are. They should be nourished and supported by their readers.

I'm not a nationalist or a patriot, but there's something in the place that you grew up in that pulls at you the farther you go from home. While working in Latin America, my home town newspaper was a life line for me to Vermont, cushioning dizzying realities abroad with local news I could identify with.

But now more than ever these local papers are disappearing. They're being bulldozed over by corporate conglomerates, dropping ad sales and competition in general with internet-based news outlets.

Daily papers in major cities across the US have been folding at an alarming rate this year. Rocky Mountain News in Denver has closed its doors, and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer stopped its print operation to go online. In addition, The Detroit Free Press, The Miami Herald, The Kansas City Star and The Fort Worth Star-Telegram all made major cuts this year. The Ann Arbor News will be closing this July after a 174-year history.

When this happens, the reporters are hit hard, but the communities that depend on these papers suffer as well. "We need to view journalism in the same way that we view libraries and public schools, as absolutely essential to any prospering community," Theodore Glasser, a professor of communications at Stanford University, told USA Today.

It's not that I always agreed with the editorial decisions made by my hometown weekly and its writers all the time. I think, for example, that it could sometimes be more political, more agitating and more investigative. Yet it serves a fundamental purpose in the community as a reference point on local news, life and issues. The same is true for local papers across the nation.

After various connecting flights, taxi rides, and layovers, I finally arrived in Burlington after about five months in Latin America. A few days later, when opening the paper for the first time, the news entered my brain in a different way than it had online: I could smell it, hear its pages rustle, and some of the ink rubbed off on my fingers.

As I caught up with news on the state budget and read a column by a local taxi driver, I realized that the paper had become like so many friends I ran into upon coming back to Burlington - something that helped define my place in the world. Like the parks of the city, the taste of a local beer and the contours of the mountains across the lake, this local newspaper was a part of the landscape.

When I finished reading the paper, I went outside and laid sections of it down between the rows of vegetables in my garden, placing hay on top of the paper, all to keep the weeds down. A column on the Democrats' override of a veto by our Republican governor went next to the beans, face up. An update about a new Vermont law allowing residents to dry their laundry outside on a clothesline, despite any "neighborhood restrictions or covenants" went along the rows of carrots. I laid down the history of a local jazz band next to the tomatoes.

And I knew I was finally home after the paper put local news into my brain, and began collaborating with the dirt and the sun to put local food in my stomach.
 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: local papers, newpapers, newspaper decline, independent newpapers

Benjamin Dangl is the author of The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia (AK Press, 2007). He is also the editor of TowardFreedom.com, a progressive perspective on world events, and UpsideDownWorld.org, a news website uncovering activism and politics in Latin America. Email BenDangl(at)gmail(dot)com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Chalk it up to extremist capitalism
Posted by: Moonray on Jun 18, 2009 4:58 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice piece. If the feds can subsidize Detroit's gas guzzlers, I don't know why they can't cough up a few Monopoly bucks for the Daily Thunder down on Main Street. But local papers are going the way of the town's gazebo and record store and malt shop.

Just more casualties of our extremist capitalism, which is eating America alive. Paradoxically, the Demopublicans are resorting to socialist measures to keep this extreme capitalist house of cards erect for the time being, but sooner or later it's all going to come crashing down. And we will have to get the news from electric boxes like this one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Take back MSM/PBS/NPR
Posted by: weathered on Jun 18, 2009 6:19 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"all things considered" - only if it excludes a stolen election in 2000, 9/11, theft of Iraq/Afgn, a redistribution of wealth and of course anything resembling the Ugly truths about Israel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

my hometown paper...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Jun 18, 2009 10:34 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
shut down in 1994 - though it did celebrate 100 years of publication...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hard pressed
Posted by: blackdog on Jun 19, 2009 12:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting article.
As a professional journalist who works for a competitor of the major daily in my hometown, I see that paper undergoing the staff reductions, reducing pay of the surviving staff, and the resulting shorter shrift given to community news - a package of briefs is all that is left of what was a few years ago several daily editions zoned for various parts of the metro area.
I, too, am troubled by the changes in my industry. The big paper here is doing a good job of investigative pieces of the type and scope that smaller papers cannot touch because their own reduced staffs are too busy trying to fill space in the next edition; they can't focus on long-term pieces that may take weeks or months to research. But that investigative journalism comes at the expense of daily coverage of the various communities in the area.
I am told that smaller papers are better positioned to withstand the changes in the industry, as they can become "hyperlocal." The big metro daily in my area also owns a chain of weekly papers serving the various communities surrounding my area; those papers are easy to figure out: a local common council and/or plan commission story, a feature of some sort or other, press release briefs, a story about local kids (school plays make for riveting journalism!) and high school sports. As a married, childless renter, I can chalk all of that up to: Who cares about any of it?
I once thought that everything that happens is a story to somebody. That might be true. But is it a story everyone will want to read?
Try as I might, I can't bring myself to care too greatly about local bands, when the farmers market opens, whose kid did what at the conference meet, or what any church is doing this week. And there are more out there like me (who don't work in the field) than the suits in the papers' top-floor offices would like to acknowledge.
Newspapers have a bigger problem than they are willing to admit: Apart from declining ad revenues and giving away their product for free online because no one wants to pay for access to a paper's Web site, their future customers aren't paying attention. How many people under 30 are reading newspapers these days?
Given the challenges of the Internet, the newspaper is like the telegraph in the age of radio, or the buggy makers watching Model Ts roll off the line.
It is that simple.
This is to say nothing of the future of journalism. Journalism in some form or other will survive. But the Woodward and Bernstein types will be the most endangered. It is already common for a newspaper to provide coverage merely by linking online readers to other (ostensibly competing) sources, rather than retain a staff that can go out and get those stories on their own.
But in an age where people think that if it's on the Internet it must be true, how many will truly notice what they've lost?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hard pressed Posted by: bobson
YESTERDAYS NEWSPAPER
Posted by: sowles on Jun 19, 2009 2:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gees, now I have to finds something new to line my bird's cage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Newspaper decline rooted in their corporate and class war bias.
Posted by: jcrw on Jun 19, 2009 3:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The corporate and capitalist bias of all major and national newspapers is so taken for granted that it is never considered as a major factor in newspaper decline and demise.

The core income of profit-making mass media is advertising. The advertisers want to reach readers with disposable income who can purchase their products and services. The content of the newspaper must be geared to supplying the needs of these affluent readers. Under no circumstances must any newspaper content alienate or attack or conflict with the profit-seeking advertisers and wealthy readers. Thus the class-bias of the major national print media.

This class bias, decades old, has degenerated into the unending class war propaganda against the economic interests of working people and the working class.

Working people, especially with the 30 year decline and now collapse of U.S. capitalism, have little or no disposable income for new cars, expensive homes, or other non-essential goods and services. The national newspapers no longer have sections of "Help Wanted" ads as millions are unemployed. Why pay 75 cents a day for essentially useless information.

Editorial pages and opinion columns scream about reducing taxes and all tax support public services that increasingly impoverished working people desperately rely upon. Uncritical support of unending wars, wars which are highly profitable to the military-industrial investors and coporations, wars that suck up funds for public services (public schools,hospitals, health,etc.), are forever supported.

The national newspapers typically provide entire sections of interest to the class of wealthy business owners, investors and corporate managers. Stock market reports, investment strategy columns, economic reports, etc. provide the readers interesting and useful information.

No such informational, educational or analysis opinion resources are available in ANY NEWSPAPER to working people. There is never any "Labor" column, or news about the labor movement. There is no information or opinion column where the economic interests of working people are defended or promoted.

Today the only place where information and opinion essential to working people is readily available and free of charge, is on the web. One such place is the World Socialist Web Site: http://www.wsws.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Worthless
Posted by: Zeugitai on Jun 19, 2009 6:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The local paper here in my small town is worthless, and has been for a long while. Do not romanticize it. It is run by a pompous jerk, prints trite crap, is way overpriced at $0.75 for its few small sheets, and survives only because it has a monopoly on immediately local advertising.

Small town papers are exactly like big ones: the local power elite who own the few businesses, the banks, and who hold all the seats in the local government and Presbyterian church, steer the paper as a vehicle for their own PR, to align people with their conservative agenda, and, as the author pointed out, to define people who otherwise wouldn't know the point of their own little lives. It defines the town and the people in it and serves as an instrument of American orthodoxy.

By the way, this town is over 99% white, and Protestant.

Bunk!

Good riddance to small town papers!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not such a bad thing
Posted by: willymack on Jun 19, 2009 11:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most "newspapers" are crap anyway. They're owned or controlled by a few corporate scumbags, who present a view of the world favorable only to themselves.
My hometown paper (as another poster noted) is a pathetic rag with brain-dead numbskulls as its target market. Its best feature is the funnies. I have serious doubts as to the qualifications of its "journalists".
It became painfully apparent during the bush nightmare that the folks there either hadn't a clue, were afraid to stir up resentment among the local rubes who worshiped the bushies, or were ass-kissers themselves. Disgusting. If the paper folds, I'll be one of the first to say "good riddance".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not such a bad thing Posted by: sophiej
A BIG MISTATKE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 20, 2009 2:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A country without newspapers is in big trouble. The fact that people don't care makes a big statement about them. The shouting matches on TV, the blogs are not the same thing. The internet is great, but that news comes from Newspapers. With an assortment of newspapers around the country it will always be possible to find out what's happening. But all the electronic devices we own all around the world can be shut down in a heartbeat. If people could only get beyond believing that newspapers are for the very old and those afraid of technology. That's not the case. Printing presses have been known to operate and produce newspapers for the people through wars and everything else you can imagine. Look at most newsstands and you'll see papers in many languages. People come here from all over but they want a newspaper they can read in their own language. There's a reason for that. Underground papers have existed for ages. We should try to get papers to merge or print less frequently to cut costs. But to let them vanish altogether is giving up one of our basic rights without a fight. It will be worth remembering that this is not being taken from us, it's being given away. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement