Are Celebrities Destroying Twitter?
Also in Media and Technology
Is Right-Wing Media Hustler Trying to "Blackmail" Obama's Attorney General over ACORN Videos?
David Edwards, Muriel Kane
Maddow: Anti-Muslim 'McCarthyism' Making Us Less Safe
David Edwards
Forty Years After Its First Episode, Sesame Street Is Still Saving the World
Tom Jacobs
Why I'll Never Buy a Kindle
Benjamin Dangl
How Right-Wing Cult Leader Sun Myung Moon Bought Washington
Rory O'Connor
Relentless Pressure from Progressive Groups Pushes Hatemonger Lou Dobbs Out of CNN
Tana Ganeva
So, why no love for Ashton and the Oprah?
One big no-no of social media spheres, besides blatant inauthenticity, is what I like to call shameful self-promotion. Social media rely heavily on some key principles of social capital, one being a version of karma that says you’re a better user for sharing useful information, not just promoting yourself. Kutcher’s stunts with CNN and Oprah’s arrival smack of signing up not to join in the fun, but to appropriate it make the fun theirs.
Not to mention the hubbub around ghostwriters for celebrities on Twitter. No one summed that silliness up better than Shaq himself: "It’s 140 characters. It’s so few characters. If you need a ghostwriter for that, I feel sorry for you."
The upshot of all this is that the exposure social media services like Twitter are receiving as a result of all the celebrity brouhaha is a Good Thing™ for the progressive media agenda.
No, really!
Here’s the thing: Media and all their trappings have long been the purview of upper-class straight white guys. That’s who has largely been determining which stories are important and telling them for as long as anyone can remember. Independent media have made inroads in the last century, but with the rise of social media, people are beginning to connect and share information in ways that were previously impossible.
The more people we have participating in public discourse of any kind, the better it is for a populist agenda that represents and speaks to the needs of everyday folks. Look at what happened with Amazon when it accidentally removed 58,000 books from its Web site -- social media enthusiasts came along and called them out on it. Imagine how long that might’ve taken, and through how many gatekeepers it would have had to pass, in 1999. Thanks to enough progressive folk participating in social media, LBGT, feminist and sexual-health books were restored to the site within hours, if not a few days.
So, if Oprah wants to talk about her workout, and Ashton wants to stunt his way along to millions of pieces of meaningless chatter, let them. You don’t have to follow them. But you should think about getting on board and talking about what’s important to you.
Editor's note: Check out AlterNet's Twitter feed here.
Deanna's note: If you're new to Twitter, consider reading two guides I've written: "Why Twitter, Anyways?" and "A Non-fanatical Beginner's Guide to Twitter"
See more stories tagged with: twitter, oprah, ashton kutcher, social media
Deanna Zandt is a contributing editor at AlterNet.
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.