Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Why Much of Asia Didn't Hear Sean Penn's "Homo-Loving" Speech

By David Flumenbaum, Huffington Post. Posted March 3, 2009.


Networks serving over 300 million viewers in 53 countries muted, omitted or mistranslated anything gay-related in Oscars speeches.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In recent days, journalists around the globe have reported on the efforts of Asian governments to censor speech and images in support of gay rights from the broadcast of last Sunday's Oscars. According to the AP, the Hong Kong-based, Murdoch-owned STAR network, reaching more than 300 million viewers in 53 countries, muted any mention of "gay" or "lesbian" during its tape-delayed, English-language re-broadcast of the Oscars. Sean Penn and Dustin Lance Black, who both won Oscars for their work on the film Milk, used their time at the podium to voice support for same-sex marriage and equal rights for gays and lesbians.

In mainland China, where the Academy awards was broadcast with Chinese subtitles on state-run China Central Television (CCTV), censors did not mute out material deemed sensitive, but rather, and even more shamefully, omitted or mistranslated all language and images dealing with homosexuality. According to a Monday post on the China-based blog Shanghaiist, the CCTV broadcast cut out two gay kisses shown during the broadcast and completely eliminated Dustin Lance Black's acceptance speech after he won for best original screenplay.

Black, who is openly gay, invoked Harvey Milk in his speech and promised equal rights "very soon" to the nation's gay youth. "If Harvey had not been taken from us 30 years ago," Black said, "I think he'd want me to say to all of the gay and lesbian kids out there tonight who have been told that they are less than by their churches or by the government or by their families that you are beautiful, wonderful creatures of value." While Black's speech was widely considered one of the more moving and memorable moments from this year's Oscars, for viewers in Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, India, Taiwan and Thailand, the speech was heavily censored, while those in mainland China didn't hear a word of it.

For anyone who missed it, here's Dustin Lance Black's speech:

But the award for the most creative method of censorship goes to the CCTV censors for their work during Sean Penn's acceptance speech. Penn, who won for best male lead, began his speech by saying, "you commie, homo-loving sons of guns." The politically active actor then spoke passionately to those who voted to ban gay marriage in California. "For those who saw the signs of hatred as our cars drove in tonight," said Penn, "I think it's a good time for those who voted for the ban against gay marriage to sit and reflect on their great shame and their shame in their grandchildren's eyes if they continue that support."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: china, gay, censorship, oscars, milk, harvey milk, sean penn, dustin lance black

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Progressives love moral relativism.
Posted by: Honky the Misanthrope on Mar 3, 2009 12:29 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every time I insult Islam for being ass backward savages, or Latinos for being over breeding slaves to their Roman king, the "We are the World" crowd comes out of the wood work and tells me to expand my world view beyond my honky bourgeois view point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Honkey's Irony Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Honkey's Irony Posted by: zola77
» Sounds great. Posted by: Beck
Censorship
Posted by: kittybrat on Mar 3, 2009 4:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Censorship keeps us all from moving forward. I'm delighted we have come so far as to not only allow these speeches, but to celebrate the words and the people involved.
Evolution of ideas comes slowly to those who's views are censored and skewed.
Sean Penn mentioned the hatred. Those who hate all things homo have not arrived at this by themselves. They have been censored and told what to think by authority figures and angry non-progressives.
Now is the time for rights to be proclaimed by all, and the censors and biogots to be left without power.
Soon. Very soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Be loud and proud
Posted by: sabrina on Mar 3, 2009 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These comments need to be heard by young gay people growing up arund the world. We must repeat them over and over, and louder and louder to overcome the censorship and misinformation coming from the forces arrayed against us. Live your life out and proud. Be a role model for young folks struggling with their sexual identity.

Richard

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I might remind some of you that especially in Pakistan and India, same sex is a no-no.
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 3, 2009 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Either you're stoned to death or seriously humiliated by societal intolerance that you'd almost wish to commit suicide there. I am quite surprised though that wearing a dhoti despite it being some form of a skirt is highly acceptable there though I have to admit it feels comfortable once I tried it on. Maybe if we promote skirts for men in Asia might the same sex phobia eventually fade?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Personally,
Posted by: bettyn on Mar 3, 2009 8:33 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought Black's speech was the most moving part of the entire Academy Awards show. It should have been heard by everyone. Looks like we're not the only country that has to contend with government trying to snoop in everyone's bedrooms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shame? What shame?
Posted by: thesbrian on Mar 3, 2009 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those who opposed these amendments have no shame - dishonesty, fabrication, distortion - they'll do whatever it takes to get their way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Human Rights
Posted by: archivist on Mar 5, 2009 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gays are human and therefore deserve human rights. But people who are exclusivly gay as in not able to reproduce are mentally ill. These people need help and the more time we spend approving of mental illness as being an alternative lifestyle the worse the problem will become. Perhaps it could be a genetic problem as well.

I acknowledge rights of all humans but I can't bring myself to call this healthy behavior. Physycology is just now becoming refined into somewhat of a science and is starting to wrestle with the many varied forms of mental illness. Some of these problems people have are not as obvious as the common mental illnesses that some have come to recognize and equate with mentall illness or common personality disorders.

Recently compiled research has just shown that phsycopaths are literally everywhere and almost impossible to detect and diagnose until it is much too late (no treatment). They appear as normal charming talented people when in fact they are human predators who are literally without empathy or understanding of others feelings and therefore incapable of having "natural" feelings for others.

Gays are used by certain elements in our society to divide us. What we need is a loving framework in which to help these people and the courage to admit when they can't be helped. Instead this disorder is presented to our children as an acceptable way in which one can choose to live their life. I refuse to believe homosexuality is a choice made by anyone. It is in fact that no one chooses to treat it.

Church elders, government, and bewildered parents are hardly qualified to deal with this.

My children will be taught to be tolerant of all people (excluding those who infringe on their freedom). But they will know that these people have problems who need help or can't be helped.

Tolerance is natural, hate is learned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Human Rights Posted by: fieldingmellish
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement