Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reactions to Obama's Historic Moment From Around the Globe

AlterNet. Posted January 21, 2009.


A roundup of reactions to this historic changing of the guard from newspaper editorial pages around the world.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Over the past eight years, the gap between most Americans' perception of their country's role in world affairs and that of the citizens of other nations has grown into a yawning chasm. For several years, global public opinion polls have found that a majority of the planet's residents believe the United States plays a "mainly negative" role in world affairs.

Much of Obama's inaugural speech was directed not only to the citizens of this country, but to the rest of the world as well. In a rebuke to the Cheney Doctrine, and other neoconservative madness that drove so many of Bush's policies, Obama said that earlier generations of American leaders had "understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint."

Time will tell how that translates into policy -- exactly what kind of change™ the Obama administration will bring to Washington. It's not only Americans who wait with eager anticipation to see. We rounded up reactions to this historic changing of the guard from newspaper editorial pages around the world, most via the excellent work of Watching America, a website that compiles -- and translates -- stories about the U.S. from the international media.

In The Guardian, Polly Toynbee writes that "even in lazily cynical Britain" the population "will all remember where we were today."

There has never been a day like it for Britain's postwar generations. As that inauguration speech echoes out, the globe itself seems to inhale a mighty, collective intake of breath, frighteningly audacious in its hope.
How does the man's arrival feel here? A day like no other, in a time of multiple crisis like none other. In the years of plenty, the British since the war have known little political excitement. …
So here comes the man who says he can [fix the many crises we face]. It's an American mystery that this great pool of genius has usually thrown such minnows into the White House. But the monumental present danger has summoned forth a man who promises the intellect, character and power of persuasion to match the hour.
On this day all alive will remember where they were when they saw Obama sworn in, when they heard him speak. I shall be in a Commons meeting room -- where Dawn Butler, the black MP for Brent, will be launching "Bernie's list" to promote black candidates -- with crowds of mainly ethnic-minority young Brent people gathered to watch Obama's speech. Since the rise of Obama, the MP says, throngs have come forward to join her campaign.
Let whoever will be cynical do so today: they will have their I-told-you-so moments. Political passion is unfashionable, risky, naive and destined for disappointment. Enthusiasm is rare in British politics, but today is a reminder that it is always worth celebrating the better over the worse. The hope is not just for what the man will do, but that his brand of politics rubs off on politicians everywhere. It wasn't until Obama was elected on a tax-the-rich ticket that Brown and Darling dared to follow suit, 11 years late. This is a day for politicians to take heart and dare to challenge recycled focus group prejudice.

In the Norwegian Dagsavisen, they struck quite a different tone …

The only thing certain about Barack Obama's presidency is that many people will be disappointed. The expectations for an almost revolutionary wave of change in both America and in America's relationship with the world are unrealistic and will end in a collective political depression.
America has not chosen a wizard or magician to govern the nation of over 300 million people. The limitations are staring the new president in the face: financial crisis, economic recession, more and more job losses (half a million jobs lost in December alone), an astronomical burden of debt, two wars in which America plays the part of the main belligerent, and a national reputation that, in parts of the world, will need to be salvaged from the remaining wreckage.

Some struck a chord somewhere in the middle -- expressing hope for the new administration, but skepticism about its ability to overcome the challenges before it. Peru's La Republic:


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iran, iraq, economy, obama, afghanistan, middle east, gaza, crisis, pakistan, world opinion, inauguration

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Spain's "ABC Journal" Skewed History of Afghanistan War
Posted by: colleenwhalen on Jan 21, 2009 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A newspaper in Spain - the "ABC Journal" has a phenomenally delusional version of the history of Afghanistan.............

QUOTE:

"Obama is trusted to have a great strategy to, once and for all, settle Afghanistan, a country where British, Soviet and NATO allies have failed for 100 years"


Well, Britian, Soviet and NATO allies INVADED Afghanistan in illegal, acts of agression which violated Geneva Convention accords. In 1960, Afghanistan kicked out a corrupt monarchy which was sent into exile, and the creation of a democratic Afghan Parliment was created. In 1960, Afghanistan passed their own version of an "Equal Rights Ammendment" for women - guaranteeing all women equal rights. Women in the 1960's in Afghanistan graduated from universities and worked in professional jobs. In the 1960's women in Afghanistan served in Parliment and ran for political offices, served as judges, etc.

Afghanistan passed their version of ERA in 1960 - but in 2009, America still does not have the ERA - Equal Rights for Women legislation passed.

Britian, Russia and NATO allies illegally invaded Afghanistan - fighting the Cold War against the USA in Afghanistan. For Russia - their illegal, obscene and genocidal invasion of Afghanistan was a Soviet version of America invading Vietnam.

The reason Britian, Russian and NATO allies "failed" in Afghanistan was because they DID NOT BELONG there in the first place.

Obama's idea of global peacemaking is just to pull out of Iraq and ship our soliders to Afghanistan. The Afghan people don't want us in their country - we've done nothing to make it more democratic since Bush invaded Afghanistan shortly after 9/11.

Obama is not a progressive Democrat. Obama is a Corporate Democrat - a Centrist Democrat who has loaded his Cabinet and many other politically appointed jobs with Clinton insiders and Wall Street establishment representatives of transnational corporate cartels.

Yeah, anything would be better than
McCain/Palin who are downright crypto-fascist.
But do I expect the big "changes" Obama has promised? Nope - not one bit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You're full of crap Posted by: EncinoM
Improve America's low self-esteem
Posted by: weathered on Jan 21, 2009 6:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dismantle AIPAC or watch it corrupt this administration too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Since when do we have low self-esteem? Posted by: Joshua Holland
America's past leaders exercised prudence? Restraint? In which parallel universe?
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 21, 2009 11:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Probably OT (it's not about the globe's reaction), but when I heard this, I scoured my brain for an example when this was actually true. Obama said that earlier generations of American leaders had "understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint."

I can't find a single example of when this actually occurred in 'Merkaaner history. I am aware that the popular 'Merkaaner propaganda is that this is the case, but just because people believed the world was flat didn't make it so.

I read the transcript then heard the clips on the Web of the inaugural speech and, while Obama is a brilliant orator, I still shuddered and felt cold deep down in my guts. This is a progressive vision?! Holy craptasm, it's gonna be a real bumpy ride.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sounds like the Brits are the only ninnies here (OK maybe Peru too).
Posted by: DaBear on Jan 21, 2009 11:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Norwegians on out seem to have nailed it best.

The amount of bellicose Amerikaan exceptionalism in the speech was shocking, the inclination to merely tinker with the status quo rather than throw out what doesn't work in favor of what does... wasn't lost on many of us here at home either.

But the delusional and all-powerful owning class has a mighty powerful kool aid and 'Merkaaners love to chug it, through funnels usually.

god damn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama Has Too many Crises to Handle
Posted by: Shankari46 on Jan 21, 2009 12:10 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The normally cynical Europeans have a point that Obama has many crises to handle at once.

The ball game changed and the same answers will not produce the same results. Obama faces a time of revolution not just economic downturn. He faces a time when oil will go away, and at least he's willing to do what he must do. He's facing global warming and a global meltdown of US as an economic power. In these economic times, he may be willing to break down the empire a bit, but we still don't know. Going from the one power to joining with others in a group power will be a challenge. I get the sense that he may be willing to do that. We need to turn on a dime to survive. We need to rethink old strategies and understand how we must change and do it quickly.

At least we have someone who understands the "shifting sand beneath our feet", and he's willing to do something about it rather than try to throw wars at problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enough!
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Jan 21, 2009 1:58 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Enough of this political junk, Alternet. I want a serious story about Michelle Obama's wardrobe. I only saw one story about her inaugural outfit on the news last night, "lemongrass yellow wool, overlain with swiss lace, lined in french silk, with netting in the back of the coat for warmth, gloves by J. Crew. The little daughters were adorable too in their Crew coats. Now THAT is serious reporting. After all, we have the most beautiful first lady and daughters in the history of the entire world!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nough! Posted by: mountainsrock
Now look
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Jan 21, 2009 2:21 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Huffington Post beat Alternet to the serious story:

Michelle O is the New Jackie O, say Fashion Pros

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pakistan still has its parasitic sights on Afghanistan
Posted by: 876 on Jan 21, 2009 2:49 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Typically the Pakistani reaction is to focus their parasitic sites on Afghanistan. Of course they rally for Americans to leave Afghanistan so they can pick up where they left off with their proxy armies to attempt to pillage, once again, as it has for years, the natural resources of Afghanistan, and control its politics. Interesting that they’re primary focus is the fate of a foreign nation, should most definitely raise questions of motive. Apparently this is what imperialist imposed nations are for, to create a perpetual state of war and allow for imperialist powers to manipulate the region. Pakistan must be dismantled as urgently as Israel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You mut be kidding - right? Posted by: harryf200
» RE: Open your eyes Posted by: 876
» RE: Open your eyes Posted by: chance garden
Absolutely, let the Nazis tell it like it is!
Posted by: Rosasharn on Jan 21, 2009 5:26 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a very GROSS cross section of world media, one in which I believe does NOT represent anything but the worst kind of Limbaugh-ish tongue wagging. Why is Alternet giving space to this sh - -? Is someone on the staff a wee bit BITTER? Sure seems like it, given that world media I heard was VERY HOPEFUL over Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Can He Walk on Water? Posted by: Windwhistler
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement