Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Cable News Phenom Maddow Doubles Her Audience in a Matter of Days

By Brian Stelter, The New York Times. Posted October 22, 2008.


Word is spreading like wildfire about the MSNBC host's hard-hitting new show.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg


Rachel Maddow, a woman who does not own a television set, has done something that is virtually unheard of: she has doubled the audience for a cable news channel's 9 p.m. hour in a matter of days.

More important for her bosses at MSNBC is that "The Rachel Maddow Show," her left-leaning news and commentary program, has averaged a higher rating among 25- to 54-year-olds than "Larry King Live" on CNN for 13 of the 25 nights she has been host. While the average total audience of her program remains slightly smaller than that of Mr. King's, Ms. Maddow, 35, has made MSNBC competitive in that time slot for the first time in a decade. The channel at that hour has an average viewership of 1.7 million since she started on Sept. 8, compared with 800,000 before.

Given that advertising dollars -- and the reputations of networks -- rise and fall on prime-time ratings, Ms. Maddow's rise has been closely watched by media executives.

"I'm pinching myself," said Phil Griffin, the president of MSNBC, who used to caution that it "takes two or three years for a show to find its audience." That was certainly true for Keith Olbermann, whose five-year-old "Countdown" program at 8 p.m. (which leads into Ms. Maddow's program) now beats CNN in the 25-to-54-year-old demographic segment every evening.

Mr. Griffin said that Ms. Maddow's advantages included her regular appearances on "Countdown" and her popularity on the Internet, where, he said, "word spread like wildfire" about her new show. Ms. Maddow, a former AIDS activist, was also presumably helped by her four years on the Air America radio network.

Ms. Maddow and every other cable news anchor are beneficiaries of the heightened interest in the presidential campaign. Fox News Channel's "O'Reilly Factor," the highest-rated hour on cable news, reached an average of four million viewers in September; it had two million during the same period a year ago.

Still, Ms. Maddow's ascent is unique in its swiftness. Her program immediately drew almost half a million viewers ages 25 to 54 in a slot where a quarter of a million is more common. Even if her ratings decline after the election -- and history suggests they are likely to -- Mr. Griffin contended that Ms. Maddow's performance confirmed that cable news was "a three-way race now."

Fox News did not comment for this article. Ryan Jimenez, a spokesman for "Larry King Live," said in a statement that the shows couldn't be more different: "While our competitors have moved to partisan extremes, we continue landing the biggest guests because we embrace the vast middle and have a wider appeal," he said.

The daily rhythm of television ratings has required an adjustment for Ms. Maddow, whose broadcasting skills were fine-tuned on the radio.

"You don't get overnights in radio," she said in an interview, discussing the ratings. "This instant 4 p.m. burst of feedback is hard to get used to."

But she has adopted the vocabulary quickly, praising Mr. Olbermann for a "931 in the demo" last Tuesday. (That night, Mr. Olbermann's average of 931,000 viewers 25 to 54 lifted MSNBC to a rare prime-time win over both Fox News and CNN.)

Ms. Maddow acknowledges that much of her success can be attributed to the lead-in from "Countdown," which continues to be MSNBC's marquee program. For years Mr. Olbermann, a vocal critic of the Bush administration, had pushed the network to install a thematically similar program in the 9 p.m. hour, and in August MSNBC decided to replace "Verdict With Dan Abrams" with Ms. Maddow. While Mr. Abrams on occasion bested Mr. King in the ratings, Ms. Maddow's wins are coming at a more frequent rate.

In her first six weeks Ms. Maddow on many nights is retaining more than 90 percent of Mr. Olbermann's audience, a figure that many television executives would envy.

Encouraging the audience to stay put, the two programs often cover similar subjects most nights: on Friday, for example, Ms. Maddow appeared on "Countdown" to discuss the political maneuverings inherent in the contentions of voter registration fraud, and in her following hour she devoted two segments to the same subject.

While Mr. Olbermann watches Mr. O'Reilly's show on a monitor embedded in his desk, Ms. Maddow insists that she has never watched either Mr. King's program or the 9 p.m. program on Fox News, "Hannity & Colmes," which garners more viewers than either of the other shows.

Partly, she said, that lack of competitive interest is an effort to remain original. "I worry every day about the homogenizing forces at work in my professional life," she said, adding that it can be difficult to preserve creativity within cable's production process. It helps, she said, that she does not own a television at home.

Even so, Ms. Maddow said, she has finally committed to getting a set, primarily so that her companion can watch her program. With Ms. Maddow delivering MSNBC a record audience, it might seem that the least the network could do would be to deliver her a television.


© 2008 The New York Times

AlterNet is making this material available in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107: This article is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: msnbc, rachel maddow

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Go Rachel Go
Posted by: EJW on Oct 22, 2008 3:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Smart is Sexy,

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about a podcast?
Posted by: No.mad on Oct 22, 2008 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't get cable. I watch Olbermann on podcast every night. When can I expect Maddow's podcast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What about a podcast? Posted by: Sagan
Boomers appreciate Rachel too
Posted by: jonlen on Oct 22, 2008 4:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't fit into the 35-54 demographic (I'm 61)
but I find her style and ability to get at the
issues phenomenal. I lean the same way as Ms.
Maddow politically, and I surely do appreciate
her expertise at expressing the views we share
so precisely with just the right dose of sarcasm and humor. In addition, she has shown
a great deal of gutsy determination by not
taking any crap from those who would try to
'fool us again'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America's Girl Reigns Supreme
Posted by: godsbreath64 on Oct 22, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Rachel!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is a huge untapped market for progressive commentary.
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Oct 22, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a political junkie, trapped in the middle of the "heartland." If there is nothing political to listen to on NPR, I'll tune in to Hannity or Limbaugh. Clearchannel and their ilk have the entire radio spectrum locked up, and progressive talk locked out. They are apparently quite willing to give up a guaranteed market for their right-wing ideology. The market is there, which Rachel's success has proven on two fronts, radio and cable.

Since discovering Rachel Maddow I have subscribed to Air America Radio podcasts. It is a cumbersome arrangement, but until progressive talk comes to Missouri it will have to do. Now it is very rarely that I tune in to hate radio, usually just to find out what they are whining about today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christopher
Posted by: jadefoxx on Oct 22, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not in the demographic market, being 62, however, I watch Keith almost religiously, and now, Rachel. I think they make an excellent one two punch to MSM and especially the noise coming out of FauxNews(which I never watch) or the often lukewarmness of CNN. I believe MSNBC has done a great service to America by putting up these two programs. Keep up the great work!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Christopher Posted by: jonlen
CHEERS TO MSNBC
Posted by: SPANKY70 on Oct 22, 2008 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the best news/political show to hit the tube since Countdown. I wouldn't miss Rachel for anything, what a relief to finally have a good looking philly with brains. It's wonderful to have someone in discourse without yelling. I stopped watching Faux completely, what a bunch of dunderheads. Congrats Rachel, hope the show lasts until you want to stop doing it. I don.t fit the demographic either, since I'm 72.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you like Rachel you'll like Thom Hartmann's show!!
Posted by: Fog on Oct 22, 2008 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you're a fan of Rachel's as I am (you're smart and concerned) I highly recommend listening to Thom Hartmann's show. Brilliance.

He should be required viewing/listening!

http://thomhartmann.com/


.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Intelligent
Posted by: TomG on Oct 22, 2008 10:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The thing I like about Rachel's show, and Keith's, is that they, for the most part, try to present intelligent guests speaking objectively. The idea that you can attain objectivity by making sure you have two, or more, idiots from each side yelling at each other is as bankrupt as Rovian politics.

TomG

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rachel -- I love you BUT
Posted by: sunspot on Oct 22, 2008 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please don't do exactly the same stories as Keith. There's no need to watch your show if it's redundant. Keith's on when we eat dinner, and we'll keep the tv on IF it's interesting & we have lots of dishes to wash. ;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Liberal Ann Coulter?
Posted by: BobbyGreyFriar on Oct 22, 2008 11:46 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But what's appealing about Olbermann's show is that it flatters one's prejudices--like Bill O'Reilly's, it does not provide facts from which one can take informed action, it's just a tirade punctuated with frequent commercial breaks. I haven't seen this new show, but I expect it's much of the same. If so, while it may give one smug satisfaction, it's neutrally beneficial--not harmful but not really helpful either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Liberal Ann Coulter? Posted by: jonlen
Rachel Maddow
Posted by: Cathy on Oct 22, 2008 12:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love Rachel's tv show and her radio show.

The only problem I see is that now her radio show is re-playing material from her previous day's tv show. So for me it's a repeat. I am listening to her radio show less and less because of the repeats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When I read KO's ratings were zooming
Posted by: paulmagillsmith on Oct 22, 2008 2:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it was like a long black cloud had finally lifted from television news. With Maddow on now there's even the hint of sunshine peeking through, and when early I even watch Chris Matthews now sometimes, who I'm sure is getting bit of a ratings bounce also since Rachel showed up. His show seems to have improved, too.

Sure it's opinionated, but isn't this what we need after having right wing opinions constantly crammed into our eyes & ears for far too many years now?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hooray for Rachel and I don't mean Ray
Posted by: MargaretRose on Oct 22, 2008 7:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm 54,just barely inside that desireable demographic -- but I love the RMS because -- Ms Maddow is young, she's fresh, she's funny. She doesn't yell, she doesn't throw things, but she's got s steely resolve when she's asking the tough questions.
I used to watch Olbermann and then Maddow. Now I don't even watch Keith, I just wait till nine and watch the RMS. Thanks, Rachel, you have given me back an hour every day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

parrotuya
Posted by: parrotuya on Oct 22, 2008 7:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This lady rocks! Listen up suits at MSNBC: more like Rachel Maddow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rachel, You are Great
Posted by: mindtrvlr on Oct 22, 2008 10:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She is single handedly taking over Cable News Shows

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm old enough to remember
Posted by: willymack on Oct 23, 2008 12:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When newscasters were actualy highly educated JOURNALISTS, schooled in proper English, diction, and elocution. Their perfect diction and eloquent style were a real pleasure to hear, as was their freedom to express their opinions without fear of censure from angry station owners. You could actually LEARN something from these true professionals. It's a real pleasure to see some of that professionalism returning to the airwaves in the persons of Kieth Olbermann and Rachel Maddow. We dearly need a return of a free press and radio and television venues if there's to be any hope of a free America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm old enough to remember Posted by: orwellturns
pacrimco
Posted by: pacrimco on Oct 23, 2008 5:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Olbermann and Maddow are a great team. They are the best one-two Progressive punch in the media today. Rachel is a breath of fresh air, intelligent, well spoken and very easy on the eyes. She presents with great humor and usually asks the salient questions and then allows you to come up with your own answers.I have followed her since the beginning on the radio and will remain a strong fan to her TV program. I have tried to watch FOX NEWS from time to time but sad to say, it's just impossible to take them seriously as a legitimate NEWS source. Go Rachel and Keith, we 're out here for you and we'll support your sponsors as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jeanna
Posted by: jeanna on Oct 23, 2008 1:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some time ago I discovered Maddow doing short segments on the internet & was pleased when she first began to appear on MSNBC programs. Now my husband & I, who defy the demographics by being over 80, never miss her show. She masters the art of of being able to disagree without being disagreeable. Both Maddow and Olbermann give us hope for the future of our country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rachel and Olbermann
Posted by: Afriedell on Oct 23, 2008 2:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What demographics? I think all that's out the window now. Times have changed, people.

Andrea
(66 years old)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Randi
Posted by: wagnerrocks@gmail.com on Oct 25, 2008 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rachael and Keith are the future. Goodbye Billo and Larry, you both embody boredom and right leaning nonsense. Try adding Randi Rhodes on radio and you get the full spectrum of truth to power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: andi Posted by: orwellturns
THOM HARTMANN, RANDI RHODES I ALSO LOVE
Posted by: orwellturns on Oct 26, 2008 12:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know about you, but I'm often astounded by Mr. Hartmann's knowledge and complete sense of fairness towards all AND all over the world. Randi Rhodes, bawdy, beautiful, courageous and my complete hero.
Keith, Rachel, Thom and Randi as well as Mike Malloy (and others) for that matter have the courage to speak for those of us who don't have a voice.
I AM BUILDING MONUMENTAL STATUES, IN MY MIND, OF THE ABOVE, IN MY VERY OWN PARK OF THE FUTURE. Name of the Park: PATRIOT PARK

VOTE NOW, VOTE EARLY: OBAMA/BIDEN, READY, ABLE AND EXPERIENCED.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement