Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Memo to Media: The Palin Rape-Kit Story Has Not Been 'Debunked'

By Eric Boehlert, Media Matters for America. Posted October 9, 2008.


The central, undisputed facts of Palin's actions remain hidden in plain sight for all to see. It's time for the press to take a closer look.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Gov. Sarah Palin's introduction onto the national stage has ignited scores of Alaska-based narratives and mini-controversies as reporters and voters scrambled to learn more about her political past.

But has any other Palin issue produced the type of visceral response ignited by the revelation that while she was mayor of Wasilla, the town began charging rape victims or their insurance companies for costly emergency-room rape kits and post-assault examinations?

The story remains woefully under-covered by the mainstream media, where most outlets have shied away from tackling the touchy topic as a straight news story about Palin's political past. But the issue continues to generate all kinds of discussion in the opinion pages and online. (AmericaBlog was among the first big-name liberal blogs to highlight the story.)

The persistent buzz, I think, stems from the fact that the Wasilla story just seems so weird. What municipality would bill rape victims for traumatic post-assault forensic exams? And especially in Alaska, where the rape rate is twice the national average. And wouldn't charging the victims or their insurance companies (assuming the victims were insured) simply drive down the number of women who are willing to report sexual attacks?

Having that story hover around Palin as she introduced herself to the American people could not have helped the Republican ticket. And I suspect that's why the conservative press and right-wing bloggers have tried so hard to knock the story down, why they have been so quick to condemn journalists who dared report the rape-kit story as being unethical and biased.

But facts are not a fungible commodity.

And the hurdle the GOP press simply cannot clear in its debunking effort is that the policy did exist while Palin was mayor. Boxed in by the obvious, overeager bloggers instead claim Palin didn't "support" or even know about the policy and that Palin did not personally bill the victims herself. (Strawman alert: Nobody ever suggested Palin went around knocking on doors demanding payments.)

Sadly for Palin partisans, they got schooled on the Wasilla specifics by a 20-year-old blogger and junior at George Washington University who did what so many on the right can't quite pull off: fact-based reporting.

He proved without a doubt that Palin, as mayor, signed off on the initiative that forced rape victims or their insurance companies to foot the bill for the post-assault exam kits.

It's important to highlight the deficiencies of the so-called debunking of the rape-kit story so that reporters don't continue to ignore the issue, which raises questions about Palin's leadership. So they don't take seriously the conservative claims that the story has been proven a "lie," a "smear," a "myth," and a "bunch of baloney."

The loud pronouncements by the right have become almost a cult-like mantra online, and they seem to be effectively scaring the press off the story.

For instance, The Washington Post has never written about the rape-kit story in its news pages, according to a search of Nexis, nor has The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune, the New York Daily News, The Philadelphia Inquirer, the Baltimore Sun, The Boston Globe, Newsweek, or Time.

Credit goes to USA Today for treating the issue seriously, while CNN.com posted a detailed investigation. And on the air, CNN seems to have reported more on the issue than its cable competitors, which isn't saying much, since its competitors have virtually ignored the story.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: sarah palin, rape kits

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Media and Technology! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"Every rapist has the right to pick the mother of his child" - Sarah Palin
Posted by: counterpoint on Oct 10, 2008 11:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, okay, I made up the quote. Actually, I translated what she said from Alaskan to plain English. Linguists may differ on details but that's what it boils down to.
If my car had much less resale value, I'd use it for a bumper sticker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jeri Rasmussen, feminist, activist, mother, grandmother
Posted by: jerir on Oct 10, 2008 12:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In all of the years I have worked on women's issues from lobbying, state and national, to
my position as executive director of a women's
health clinic I do not believe I have ever read
anything quite so vile. I praise AlterNet for
bringing this information to a wider public.
To revictimize a woman who has had a traumatic experience and charge her for medical care that
might have prevent a pregnancy or diseases from
the attacker is a page out of Hitler's Germany . I guess it is just hard for me to believe another woman would in essence rape
a victim of rape through her actions. May she never be seen on the national stage without a
mark on her forehead. Adequate words simply
escape me...evil doesn't even do the job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So what?
Posted by: summerhill on Oct 10, 2008 3:32 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama wasn't even born in the United States and is therefore ineligible to run ... would like to see something on that!
http://www.obamacrimes.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» troll alert Posted by: counterpoint
» A note to Summerhill Posted by: Richard House
» RE: So what? Posted by: clthompson
» RE: facts Posted by: akbirdwm
» RE: So what? Posted by: ambj1994
» This particular troll Posted by: thetarotlady
3 Rapes and You're Out
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Oct 11, 2008 12:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The assailant rapes once, but Sarah rapes the victim twice more, once by forcing them to pay large sums for forensic tests, and again, if she gets her way, by forcing them to bear, or at least fear having to bear, the child of the rapist. Just another example of compassionate conservatism at work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THANK YOU!
Posted by: thetarotlady on Oct 11, 2008 2:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, Eric, for keeping this story alive.

It might be moot in light of recent events, but does anyone remember a few weeks ago when Palin's people tried to claim that Commissioner Monegan was actually fired because "the straw that broke the camel's back" was an unauthorized trip to DC? Then ABC finds the document that proves it was authorized. Then Palin's folk say the request was "vague", they didn't know why he was going. Well, the travel request clearly says that the purpose for the trip was to meet with Senator Lisa Murkowski. The same Senator Murkowski who has consistently pushed for more help to fight sexual assault in Alaska.

Again, it might be moot now, but there seems to be a pattern here. Either Palin is really uninterested in investigating and prosecuting sexual assault cases, or she's too lazy or dumb to know what's going on in her own office.

She ran her city like she runs her state like she might run the country. *shivers*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: - sexual assault Posted by: Lauren
I doubt story can be revived other than letter to editor
Posted by: whealeydj on Oct 11, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the financial crisis for past month is such a huge story that the rape kit controversy is largely forgotten. I mentioned this story to someone circa Sept 20 and she was appalled but hadnt heard the story and thought maybe the Lehman Brothers failure etc might have been been allowed to happen cover up this story. just use the facts to make the case Palin is anti crime victim and refuse to buy right wing spin

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It might be different...
Posted by: dumdumboy on Oct 11, 2008 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Kathleen Hanna once sang about the police not finding the Green River Killer: "It might be different if they thought that we were human."

I also fear that many people think that 'dem damn wimmen were 'probably axing fir it,' and thus don't deserve any sympathy.

As for Ms. Palin herself, I think that she sees any pregnancy as an act of God's will, which she's reluctant to interfere with.

On the bright side, at least the rape victims aren't being stoned. Yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The rape-kit angle on Palin
Posted by: eeezzz on Oct 11, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
probably is not going to buy you too many points. I know it's part of the "throw the kitchen sink" approach at this point - but it's not a topic you can really discuss with most people, friends family or your children. But it looks like you can now try and squeeze some points out of the "troopergate" thing for a couple of days - until people figure out that that was really no big deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Maverick Code of Conduct (for Republicans only)
Posted by: NoMcCainPalin on Oct 11, 2008 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RULE 1: It's okay to abuse political power. (Palin)

RULE 2: It's okay to violate the public trust. (Palin/McCain)

RULE 3: It's okay to lie about your opponents. (Palin/McCain)

RULE 4: It's okay to fuel racism and hatred for your fellow Americans. (Palin/McCain)

RULE 5: It's okay to flip-flop on campaign issues to win votes. (McCain)

RULE 6: It's okay to collaborate with the enemy during wartime. (McCain)

RULE 7: It's okay to cheat on a wife who fought to keep you safe as a POW. (McCain)

RULE 8: It's okay to seal the DOD records of U.S. MIAs and POWs, including your own. (McCain)

RULE 9: It's okay not to support legislation for veterans and then claim you did. (McCain)

Stay tuned for more GOP maverick rules. If any come to mind, please tell me by replying to this comment.

Finally, if you're an undecided voter, learn the truth about Scary Sarah and Unfit McCain,
including his treasonous POW record, by clicking on: Vote Against McCain (one of the
HOTTEST anti-McCain sites on the Web)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This DNA Thing
Posted by: KeithRichardRadfordJr on Oct 11, 2008 11:57 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard that one of the large places were this information is stored in TX was so watter damaged that there is no way anyone could use that old information.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin's poll numbers are plummeting. There's a pattern of cruelty coming to light.
Posted by: thinks4herself2008 on Oct 11, 2008 8:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since character assassination is the weapon of choice for the McCain/Palin team, Palin should not be off limits:

1- She charged victims for rape kits.
2- She would force victims of rape and incest to carry unwanted pregnancies.
3- She encourages a barbaric form of hunting (see video on my site if you can stomach it
http://ideahodgepodge.blogspot.com/ ).
4- She exposed her teen daughter to the national spotlight while knowing she is unqualified for the job of VP--she didn't even hesitate.
5- She packs her Down Syndrome baby around throngs of people when these babies tend to have lowered immune systems. (Her own ego and political career are her first priority.)
6- She didn't even flinch during the VP debate when Biden spoke eloquently and passionately about the loss of his first wife and child.
7- She has zero remorse for inciting hatred and racism at her rallies; in fact, she seems to be thriving on it with a big folksy smile on her face.

This is not a person who shares my values or the values of most people in this country, and as the public becomes more fully aware of her past policies, cruelty, lies, absenteeism as governor, vendetta during Troopergate, enormous earmarks, efforts to ban books, and so forth, her popularity rating will continue to drop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

well after all
Posted by: gzuckier on Oct 11, 2008 8:22 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the woman was raped, not robbed, so it's not like she wouldn't have any money left. (just trying to see things from the palin perspective)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: well after all Posted by: thetarotlady
» RE: well after all Posted by: kungfuma
Illogical Piece of Smear Journalism
Posted by: VMRH on Oct 14, 2008 2:40 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see. I am a mayor. My police chief proposes a budget. He decreases the amount allocated for rape kits. I am supposed to KNOW that he has decided to have hospitals charge victims' insurance policies.

Sorry, that doesn't necessarily follow at all. That is an illogical leap. We have no idea what Sarah Palin thought when she saw that line item. Gosh, we would have to ASK her!

And when asked, she says, "The entire notion of making a victim of a crime pay for anything is crazy. I do not believe, nor have I ever believed, that rape victims should have to pay for an evidence-gathering test. As governor, I worked in a variety of ways to tackle the problem of sexual assault and rape, including making domestic violence a priority of my administration."

But instead of giving her the benefit of the doubt, we decide that Palin purposefully wanted this policy despite the fact that the only way to know what she was thinking would be to ask her--and when asked, she denies that she wanted this policy. Illogical leap. The claim that this is what she consciously wanted either has to be empirically verified, or it simply cannot stand as an assumption. It has not been empirically verified. Period, full stop.

This illogical smear journalism is beneath you, AlterNet. You degrade civil discourse by these puerile tactics.

Red State Feminists

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We should cover rape kits period
Posted by: janebryant on Oct 17, 2008 8:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think for all the things tax payers do pay for rape kits should be one of them and not one raped woman should ever have to be charged for a rape kit when she is the victim of a sexual crime!

Just ask yourself what you would want for your mom or wife or daughter should she ever be a victim of a sex crime!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]