Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

An Unhappy Anniversary

The Progress Report. Posted August 30, 2006.


The financial, emotional, and human costs of Hurricane Katrina have been absolutely staggering -- and they aren't subsiding yet.
Advertisement

1,833 lives lost. 270,000 homes destroyed. $55 billion in insured damage. Up to $1.4 billion in American tax dollars wasted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

Today, the costs of Hurricane Katrina are still staggering. But even more staggering has been the slow pace of recovery on the Gulf Coast. No one was happy with the federal government's initial response to the hurricane. Eighty percent of the American public think the federal government's response could have been "much better," and in September President Bush stated, "This government will learn the lessons of Hurricane Katrina."

But at Katrina's one-year anniversary, it is clear that the nation is still waiting for the help Bush promised. Sunday, as part of the White House's "public relations blitz," Bush trumpeted in his weekly radio address that the federal government has "committed $110 billion to the recovery effort."

But those billions of dollars have yet "to translate into billions in building." Perhaps most disappointingly, Bush has forgotten about his promise to the nation to confront poverty "with bold action."

As Newsweek's Jonathan Alter writes, "The mood in Washington continues to be one of not-so-benign neglect of the problems of the poor." Lessons haven't been learned, and time has run out for excuses. (The Progress Report has compiled a comprehensive timeline of the past year's events and American Progress has developed a list of actions America needs to ensure preparedness and recovery capacity for natural disasters.)

Skyrocketing housing costs: In his Sept. 15 speech, Bush stated that his administration "will stay as long as it takes, to help citizens rebuild their communities and their lives" and promised to "get the work done quickly." But one year after the storm, repopulation in New Orleans has slowed to a trickle, leaving the city with well under half its prestorm population of 460,000." Lacking the resources to return to the city are many African-Americans who formed the "working-class backbone" of the city. The Houston Chronicle notes, "Vast sections of New Orleans are still devoid of life, populated by endless rows of broken, empty houses waving "for sale" signs like flags of surrender."

By tomorrow, many New Orleans property owners may lose their former homes. The one-year anniversary of Katrina is the deadline when property owners "must have gutted the buildings or shown some signs they intend to rebuild when they can. If they don't, the city can take it as a given they do not intend to return." The average selling price for homes in areas that weren't affected by flooding has risen 25 percent. Rental rates have risen 40 percent, disproportionately affecting black and low-income families. In Biloxi, Miss., 70 percent of renters affected by the storm are black, according to an NAACP study, and another report by the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights noted that almost "100 percent of public housing families in New Orleans are African-American." Approximately 112,000 low-income homes were damaged, but only a fraction of federal housing assistance has been earmarked for rental units.

Slow economic recovery: More than 81,000 regional businesses were impacted by the storm, resulting in the loss of 450,000 jobs. In advance of his two-day trip to the region, Bush over the weekend touted the government's $110 billion commitment to Katrina recovery, noting the administration is "playing a vital role" in the Gulf Coast's reconstruction. But in reality, just $44 billion has been spent and a new ABC News poll finds that 60 percent of Americans believe the recovery money has so far been "mostly wasted."


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Hurricane Katrina! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
stupid
Posted by: rsaxto on Aug 30, 2006 1:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the stupid administration would stop spending billions on killing people overseas we could use those billions to fix our own problems instead of trying to control the whole world with the administration's arrogant stupidity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Way more than 1800 died
Posted by: mat38 on Aug 30, 2006 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The facts will never be known about how many died. But considering that thousands are still unnaccounted for, whereabouts unknown, make me believe that a cover up as to the numbers killed has been successful.
The scattering of people around in such a chaotic way was not an accident. If you can take an accurate head count then you don't know who is found or missing, how many are missing, where people are, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enlighten Me, Alternet!
Posted by: Poe on Aug 30, 2006 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Questions.


Would the levees have breached if Kerry or Gore were President?

Before the election of 2000, were the dirt poor of New Orleans just dusty, dingy, filthy poor or were they living magnificently high off the hog?

What are the odds that all 300 or so “drivers” bailed out on Mayor Nagin’s school bus evacuation “plan”?

Is the Federal Government in charge of stocking the Superdome with food and supplies when New Orleans hosts a Super Bowl or accommodating thousands during Mardi Gras?


If Condoleezza Rice had a (D) after her name, how high would her pedestal be?

If Condoleezza Rice had a (D) after her name, would she have been invited to the annual
“State of the Black Union”?

If Condoleezza Rice had a (D) after her name, would there be any acknowledgement that King’s Dream has become a reality for so many?

If Bush has supposedly angered the Arab street with his policies and opened the gates of hell, does that mean the hostage crisis in 79’, Pan Am 103 in 88’, two US embassy bombings, the USS Cole and the 93’ and 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center were the result of the gates being just slightly ajar?

Exactly what was this “opportunity” that Bush threw away right after 9/11?

Is it better to maintain the “respect and admiration” from the rest of the world by simply turning the other cheek and proof that American’s do indeed bleed?

Is there a more sensible place for the military to do their recruiting other than our high schools?
Retirement communities? Nursing homes?

If there is one Tim McViegh for every 5000 Mohammed Atta’s, is profiling still a good bet?

Why can’t we admit that we’re “involved” in the Middle East because of oil? Would it make a difference if it were wheat? Corn?

Should we apologize for having a hundred varieties of cereal to choose from, or should we hand out the playbook?

Poe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Are you paying attention? Posted by: mat38
» RE: nlighten Me, Alternet! Posted by: Hairog
What the hell do these people in our government...
Posted by: mizpearl on Aug 30, 2006 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
do with the Building Funds??

I was still on the first paragraph when it suddenly occurred to me that this is exactly the same situation that the people in Iraq have been dealing with for 3 1/2 years! All these gobs of money dedicated by our government for rebuilding, and after a year, there's still nothing to show for it.

So how much of it really is bureaucratic dithering, and how much of it, as in Iraq, is being used for more creative and personal purposes?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]