Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A Hurricane of Differences

By Glen Ford and Peter Gamble, The Black Commentator. Posted January 10, 2006.


African Americans and whites perceived the government's failed response to Katrina in drastically different ways.
Advertisement

Hurricane Katrina may mark a watershed in black perceptions of the African American presence and prospects in the United States. "It could very well shape this generation of young people in the same way that the assassinations of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King shaped our generation," said Prof. Michael Dawson, of the University of Chicago whose team conducted a survey of black and white reactions to the disaster between October 28 and November 17, 2005. "It suggested to blacks the utter lack of the liberal possibility in the United States," said Dawson, the nation's premier black social demographer.

Huge majorities of blacks agreed that the federal government's response would have been faster if the victims of Katrina in New Orleans had been white (84 percent), and that the Katrina experience shows there is a lesson to be learned about continued racial inequality (90 percent).

But only 20 percent of whites believe that the federal government's failure to respond had anything to do with race, and only 38 percent think there is something to be learned about racial inequality from the Katrina disaster.

 
Black
White
% difference
Federal Gov. response faster if victims had been white
84
20
64

Katrina shows there's a
lesson to be learned about continued racial inequality

90
38
52

The differences of perceptions based on an event to which the entire nation was exposed in living color, are staggeringly instructive. Blacks and whites saw the same images, but perceived them differently. The Dawson poll, which included approximately 500 whites and 700 blacks, shows a 64 percent difference between black and white perceptions on the federal response to Katrina, and a 52 percent divide on the disaster's significance in terms of racial equality in the United States.

A Grand Canyon looms between the way African Americans and white people view the world, despite the fact that both groups are privy to the same information and images.

However, there is a degree of murkiness in these figures, just as exists in the minds of human beings. Dawson's group surveyed black and white reactions to the statements of Kanye West, the rapper, immediately after the Katrina fiasco. West said:

"I hate the way they portray us in the media. You see a black family, it says, 'They're looting.' You see a white family, it says, 'They're looking for food.' And, you know, it's been five days [waiting for federal help] because most of the people are black. And even for me to complain about it, I would be a hypocrite because I've tried to turn away from the TV because it's too hard to watch. I've even been shopping before even giving a donation, so now I'm calling my business manager right now to see what is the biggest amount I can give, and just to imagine if I was down there, and those are my people down there. So anybody out there that wants to do anything that we can help -- with the way America is set up to help the poor, the black people, the less well-off, as slow as possible. I mean, the Red Cross is doing everything they can. We already realize a lot of people that could help are at war right now, fighting another way -- and they've given them permission to go down and shoot us! George Bush doesn't care about black people!"

Digg!

Glen Ford and Peter Gamble are the publishers of The Black Commentator. They are writing a book to be entitled, Barack Obama and the Crisis in Black Leadership.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Hurricane Katrina! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Incomplete
Posted by: ankhet on Jan 10, 2006 2:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is just an opinion summary. Of course, Blacks and Whites see things differently, whatever the things are. Old story. You need to check details - how did income and colour actually affect the kind, quantity, and immediacy of assistance provided by those in charge. What solutions were offered to/forced on White people in the same areas or parallel situations as opposed to Blacks? What structures or systems of emergency aid were available according to colour, keeping all other variables constant? Only then do you have something more substantial than gossip.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Incomplete Posted by: claudiak.
White and I agree
Posted by: MargoM on Jan 10, 2006 4:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm white and I agree that the response to Katrina would have been faster if the residence of N.O. had been predominently white. It's about race, but it's also about power. For example, New York is powerful, not just because of race, but because it is - having Wall Street and Broadway, for example. Mining is also not a powerful profession (unless you're the CEO or something), so it's not adequately regulated. In as much as the power issues in the U.S. are greatly influenced by race, the New Orleans debacle, including all the errors leading up to the recent catastrophe, the problem was race there. But such neglect is ultimately about power in the U.S., and race is one factor in that equation, granted a significant factor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: White and I agree Posted by: Samantha Vimes
» RE: White and I agree Posted by: Jimbo
» RE: White and I agree Posted by: dlf
These authors would never talk about the flooding that took place in Fargo, ND
Posted by: NDnative on Jan 10, 2006 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, wait a minute. They need some blacks to make their "discrimination" victimizations come to life. Look, there are plenty of rural white areas in Louisiana that were just as devasted with the very same GOP doing nothing to help these poor souls out and yet I don't see these same authors blasting the Bush gang on that matter. If you really want progessives and liberals to win in red states like mine, North Dakota, and Louisiana, you've got to stop overplaying the race victim card because frankly, it's no better than the rascals on the right overplaying the "gay marriage" and the "abortion" cards for political purposes. This in no way means I'm a racist whatsoever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Racial glasses
Posted by: agfusa on Jan 10, 2006 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think one adjective accurately describes the Administrations level of non-caring. I believe the Bush administration doesn't care about poor Blacks. Wealthy Blacks that provide contributions and photo ops he certainly cares about because they are useful to him. He has clearly demonstrated he doesn't care about poor Whites, either. I live in a predominately Black neighborhood, but also a poor one. It's a combination of the two that made for the unfortunate situation in New Orleans. Several of my Black friends adamantly swear that 100% of the people evacuated to the SuperDome were Black--there wasn't one single White person among them, despite photographic evidence to the contrary. Racial expectations (the expectation that Blacks will be discriminated against by Whites) shaded some of the perceptions and myths just as the article stated. The AP published a response to the two famous photos about the Black looters and Whites "looking for food"--they were written by two different photographers. While I don't think that people trapped were "looting" food, the one photographer had seen the "looters" go into a store and come out with the items. The other photographer did not see the family take anything, but they were indeed "looking for food," whether they were going to steal some or not. I think too much was placed on those two particular pictures, but I also think too much was made about people trapped taking foodstuffs ("shoot to kill"? - c'mon now!). We airlifted food and medical supplies into Europe over 50 years ago, but we couldn't get a few MRE's into New Orleans the next day? I still think the only color Bush sees is green. If it had been Miami, thousands of poor Hispanics would have been left behind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's the same old thing
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jan 10, 2006 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As much as race played a role in how the Govt handeled Katrina,so did income. Example, The Mayor orders an evacuation with no aide to poor districts. He made sure to get the landowner and shop owners time to 'bug out' but not the poor. Even then if you were a poor white person trying to survive the aftermath you were a 'Finder'.if you're black,or any non-white,you're a 'looter'. If you lived in a poor district,you were underwater with dead bodies floating about for weeks and forced to watch tour after tour of fact finders and damage ascessors none bringing food or water. I was apalled to hear the story of the folks that had to rent a limo to get out. Not about the limo,but, the fact that they drove by folks walking to get out and did nothing to help. You Bastards!
Why did'nt any of the used car lots offer 'get away' vehicles?
GREED. If you lend a car you don't get the insurance check. Guess human compassion has a price in a disaster zone. You measley little human microbes are the tip of the iceberg and the bulk of it lies in the racist,profiteering,life sucking hole we
call the U.S. Govt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Red Cross "doing everything they can" - not!
Posted by: Geni on Jan 10, 2006 9:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the contrary, following the ill-conceived advice of FEMA, the Red Cross sat on their tails on the far side of the bridge for several days and refused to even enter New Orleans. Private citizens and even Wal-Mart did an incomparably better job! Even the Canadians were busy rescuing people before they were. The Red Cross will never get another dime from me again!

One small private low-overhead NGO that was quick to respond and has kept up ongoing efforts to aid hurricane victims is Plenty.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, my, its worse than that! I believe as do some blacks that.....
Posted by: Pepper on Jan 10, 2006 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...... the 4 day active attempt to PREVENT aid from reaching the victims of the NO area and FROM LEAVING AT THE POINT OF A GUN, was intentional and not incompetence. Remember Bush was in Colorado Springs during this time period and not in New Orleans because they were conducting war games about the destruction by Nukes of a whole city and what they were going to do about it.

I said this before and I will scream it again, there is a difference between bureaucratic incompetence and downright intentional murder. You can tell where the competency rested and the speed with which the military and black ops and private contractors carrying guns came in to BRING ORDER instead of food and water. I also believe they blew the levies intentionally as well. I heard the testimony of a black woman in Congress who heard the explosions and then the water come rushing in 24 HOURS AFTER KATRINA HAD ALREADY LEFT THE AREA THAT WASN'T HIT NEAR AS BAD AS THEY EXPECTED.

FINALLY, on day 4 the sheriff had to stand up against a FEMA person who pulled the emergency communications at the sheriffs office. He had to replug it and station an armed guard there to protect those communications. THAT IS NOT INCOMPETENCY, ITS RACISM IN THAT THEY MURDERED BY INTENTION THOSE BLACK PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY WERE EXPENDABLE POOR BLACKS. ITS THAT SIMPLE, IT WAS A REAL LIFE EXPERIMENT THAT PLAYED OUT AS PLANNED.

It they tried to do that to the whites there would have been a revolution or civil war in progress over that one. I agree wholeheartedly with this article except I actually think it was even worse than he said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Junk Statistics
Posted by: NthnBrazil on Jan 10, 2006 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether or not the assertions of this article are true, the poll it is based on is statistical crap. Setting aside for the moment that a sample of approx 1200 total respondents is awfully low for 300 million americans, the total is skewed 700 to 500 in favor of African-Americans. Since African-Americans and whites make up about 13% and 69% of the US population respectively, that would imply that if the African-American response is held steady at 700, it should have been more like 3700 white respondents to at least get the same relative samples. 500 is less than 14% of the total number of white respondents that should have been sought, making the outcome of the white response not necessarily representative of the whole.

Also, the dismissal of 9% of African-American respondents as the "crazy quotient" is suspect. 9% while a minority, is a legitimate sub-group that needs to be acknowledged. Think about it: African-Americans in total only make up 13% of the US population (not much more than 9%). Should they all be disimissed out of hand just as easily? Asian-Americans make up less than 5%. By this argument they should be completely ignored.

Again, it doesn't mean the conclusions are wrong, just based on opinion cloaked as a statistically relevant poll.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Duh! Its about class!
Posted by: 538T on Jan 10, 2006 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps some people are a little too queazy too say it, or too brainwashed to even imagine it, but its all about class. The fact is, rich people don't care about poor people, black or white. Rich people control the government- they are the only people who can get elected to higher offices and are the only people that representatives are really looking out for. The upper class controls the government and its fiscal policy, obviously to its own advantage.
Sure the republicans will look down to the bottom and pander religious morality and nationalism to the bottom classes and the democrats will spin dreamy yarns about equal opportunities and national health care to the working class, but thats only around election time. Once either side is firmly in power they conviently forget the promises made to their lower constituents and simply preserve the status quo of rich over poor. For the most part, the racism observed is really just blatant indifference.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Duh! Its about class! Posted by: mejsmith
» RE: Duh! Its about class! Posted by: redjenny
44%
Posted by: ejbr on Jan 10, 2006 1:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember reading that 44% of whites (and 39% of latinos) approved of Bush's job performance AFTER Katrina. I find this disturbing on two levels: 1) those that are indifferent to the suffering of blacks and 2) those who APPRECIATE the suffering of blacks must fall within the 44% (39%) category.

Kanye was wrong to say President Bush hates black people. He should have said, President Bush and his supporters hate black people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Survey questions
Posted by: manxome on Jan 10, 2006 10:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article mentions answers to two survey questions, but not the questions themselves. It's hard to follow the article to its conclusion when I am left to trust the author's interpretation of the data. It just makes sense to provide more context.

What was, for example, the first question? Was it multiple choice, or a straightfoward "the response would have been faster if the victims had been white: agree or disagree"? Were there other questions suggesting the cause(s) of the horrible response, or was it limited to race? Did people think it was primarily something else? Several things? Were they ranked?

The second question either had to do with whether people agreed with Kayne West, or whether his comments were unjustified, or whether they agreed that Bush doesn't care about black people, or they think Bush is hostile to black people. I can't tell which one was the real phrasing of the question, but it does matter how it was worded.

Do respondents agree, as a simple yes or no? - It's a long statement. One may agree with some parts but not others. It may matter if they saw the statment originally or not.

Do people think Bush doesn't care about black people? / Do people think Bush is hostile to black people? - Care is a passive term, hostile is an active term. One can agree with one and not the other.

Just curious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The lessons of New Orleans
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jan 10, 2006 10:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Primary Lesson
The Federal, State & Local governments have largely squandered uncounted billions of dollars over decades in Emergency Planning and response. The political spoils system, the good old boy network, patronage, graft and outright incompetence has trumped the many good and dedicated people working in Emergency Planning and Management.

Secondary Lesson
Don't count on the government-- any government-- to be of any significant assistance for the first days after any large-scale disaster.

Third Lesson
Many in our country, faced with evidence and facts, will still attribute just about anything they are displeased with or confused by with some form of racism/sexism/other-ism.

There is no excuse for how badly everybody from the City of New Orleans, Orleans Parish, the Louisiana State Government and the Feds screwed up.

The only shining light I saw in all of this was the performance of the US Coast Guard. They quickly shifted every resource they could to New Orleans and went out after people. Their Helo crews were making rescues while tropical Force winds were still in the area.

Our nation has had some form of FEMA-type program since WWII at least, under many different names. Untold billions have been funneled through Federal, State and local governments to plan and prepare for this very kind of thing.

The money was obviously not well spent and for a very long time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]