Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Goodbye, New Orleans

By Mike Tidwell, OrionOnline.org. Posted December 9, 2005.


The Bush administration has given New Orleans a quiet kiss of death with its final Katrina budget package. If we can't rebuild it right, we may as well kiss it goodbye.
Advertisement

As we reach the 90-day mark since Katrina hit, it's time we ended our national state of denial. Turns out House Speaker Dennis Hastert had it right all along, though his reasons were flawed. We should call it quits in New Orleans not because the city can't be made relatively safe from hurricanes. It can be. And not because to do so is more trouble than it's worth. It's not. But because the Bush Administration has already given New Orleans a quiet kiss of death now that the story has run its news cycle.

As someone who dearly loves New Orleans and has experienced many of her charms, it pains me immeasurably to call for this retreat. This is not a rhetorical stunt or a shock argument meant to invite compromise talks. I mean what I say: Shut the city down and board it up before thousands more lives are lost.

In the weeks after Katrina, the American media somehow portrayed the catastrophe as a matter of failed levees and flawed evacuation plans. The "What went wrong?" coverage involved autopsies of every breached dike and a witch hunt for those responsible for the Superdome and Convention Center fiascos. But these were just horrifying symptoms of a much larger disease.

Katrina destroyed the Big Easy -- and future Katrinas will do the same -- not because of engineering failures but because one million acres of coastal islands and marshland have vanished in Louisiana in the last century due to human interference. These land forms served as natural "speed bumps," reducing the lethal surge tide of past hurricanes and making New Orleans habitable in the first place.

But while encouraging city residents to return home and declaring for the media audience that "we will do whatever it takes" to save the city, the President earlier this month formally refused the one thing New Orleans simply cannot live without: A restored network of barrier islands and coastal wetlands.

Tens of billions of dollars have been authorized to treat the symptoms -- broken levees, insufficient emergency resources, destroyed roads and bridges -- but next to nothing for the disease itself, that of disappeared land, which ushered the ocean into the city to begin with. No amount of levee building or stockpiling of bottled water will ever save New Orleans until the state's barrier shoreline is restored.

Just since World War II an area of land the size of Rhode Island has turned to water between New Orleans and the Gulf of Mexico, most of it former marshland. And every 2.7 miles of marshland reduces a hurricane surge tide by a foot, dispersing the storm's power. Simply put, had Katrina struck in 1945 instead of 2005, the surge that reached New Orleans would have been as much as 5-10 feet less than it was.

These marshes, as well as the barrier islands, were created by the sediment-rich flood waters of the Mississippi River deposited over thousands of years. But modern levees have prevented this natural flooding, and the existing wetlands, starved for new sediments and nutrients, have eroded and "subsided" and just washed away. Every ten months, even without hurricanes, an area of Louisiana land equal to Manhattan turns to water. That's 50 acres a day. A football field every 30 minutes!


Digg!

Mike Tidwell is the author of Bayou Farewell: The Rich Life and Tragic Death of Louisiana's Cajun Coast.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Hurricane Katrina! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Someone Finally Said It
Posted by: NoPCZone on Dec 9, 2005 12:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I personally support the limited rebuilding of a MUCH SMALLER New Orleans after a complete buyout of the city. Instead of paying out or loaning money to the property owners they should just buy them out.

Raze everything except the very limited amount of land that is close to sea level. Restore the wetlands as much as possible. Transfer title of the restored habitat to the Fish & Wildlife Service, BLM or some other agency with the staff to manage it.

Of course none of this will happen as politics and big money development has streamed in. The NOLA that you remember is gone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Someone Finally Said It Posted by: blackpyecat
Double Mass Murders
Posted by: yesman on Dec 9, 2005 2:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"To encourage people to return to New Orleans, as Bush is doing, without funding the only plan that can save the city from the next Big One, is to commit an act of mass homicide."

Since the first Katrina had been predicted well in advance and in detail, and the Bush crime cabal chose to do nothing about it, the next Katrina will be the SECOND act of mass murder in New Orleans by Bush and his criminal pals. Of course, given the mass murders he's responsible for in Iraq and elsewhere, we shouldn't be surprised that he's continuing his policy of killing (poor) people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Double Mass Murders Posted by: ALANHESTER
mass murder is right on the nail head
Posted by: billyboy43 on Dec 9, 2005 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not by accident. It is intentional, as was the withholding of aid (unless martial law would have been agreed to by La. Gov. - martial law would have allowed conditioning of the public to martial law which is part of their blue print - note it is part of the plan for the nonexistant bird flu - also no elections while under martial law). All the actions of this administration are following the blue print of The Project for a New American Century - militarily secure the remaining oil resources, control the global economy, export American jobs to low income countries, downsize the remaining population of the world, so the elite and economic contributors and consumers can live on the remaining secured resources. The more that die or are killed now, the less they will have to eliminate later. The deficits don't matter because they have no intention of re-payment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

old time religion
Posted by: menckenman on Dec 9, 2005 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jus gimme that ole time religion. The south could be hit by 20 hurricanes and never figure it out. You'd think they'd get their heads outta the Bible for one minute and look at what Bush has done to them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: old time religion Posted by: mysticpal
What else is new?
Posted by: rkewen on Dec 9, 2005 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"To encourage people to return to New Orleans, as Bush is doing, without funding the only plan that can save the city from the next Big One, is to commit an act of mass homicide."

The poster above is probably correct about "mass homicide,"
but then again, isn't mass murder one of Duuuuuuhbya's favorite pastimes. This administration has been abrogating all multilateral treaties as fast as possible, mainly to hopefully avoid future prosecution for war crimes or crimes against humanity. But if their supposed "Christian Faith" is genuine and not just a way to gain the votes of the religious retarded right, they should be worried about the afterlife that they will have to spend in Hell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mighty High-Handed idea there.
Posted by: Artkansas on Dec 9, 2005 8:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The resurrection of New Orleans isn't something someone can declare or not. Federal Aid is not the issue. President Bush doesn't currently have the power to order people to return to their homes. Indeed, many a city has grown from the mud on the shoulders of its own work and resources.

New Orleans still has a lot. It's still there were the Mississippi meets the Gulf. There still a lot of prime land around it. The Vieux Carre abides. It will survive.

How that happens and what happens should be up to those with the courage to live there and work there. It will be a blessing if the feds keep their hands off for the most part. As we've seen, they can mostly screw things up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Volunteer orgs worth giving to?
Posted by: amm80 on Dec 9, 2005 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can anyone recommend any groups that are doing good work in New Orleans? My family is itching for my Christmas list and I would like to list a few orgs that they could give to in my name. I am looking specifically for groups working in the city to help those who lost everything due to flooding.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rhetorical Question?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Dec 9, 2005 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the author:
"How could this administration, found totally unprepared for the first Katrina, not see the obvious action needed to prevent the next one?"

The question contains its own answer: "totally unprepared" – for Katrina, for Iraq, for America, for the presidency. No more needs to be said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Despite The Government
Posted by: tvdaustin on Dec 9, 2005 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are survivors on the ground rebuilding from scratch no matter what the governement screws up. While I hope that effective programs like the Rescue plan would move forward, I am not holding my breath waiting for elected officials to do the right thing.

In all natural disasters, the heroes are historically average people rising to address extraordinary events. That's what really counts when it comes to recovering. Many of us have helped out in a million little ways. This is the heart of why the effected are here today and beginning to rebuild. The most effective thing we can do is keep piling on the simple acts of direct support.

Here is a list of hurricane effected small businesses waiting to fill your holiday orders. The only people who profit from this effort are the small business owners, employees, and the local tax base. Bypass that government incompetence and get a stocking full of pralines. Yum.

Thanks for keeping on top of these issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush and Katrina
Posted by: Ellie1 on Dec 9, 2005 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Katrina did not destroy New Orleans. George W. Bush and his Bushit administration did it. He is a murderer and a bigot.
Republicans make me angry and sick. Death to all of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush and Katrina Posted by: EddieG
» RE: Bush and Katrina Posted by: mortarthegovernment
» RE: Bush and Katrina Posted by: EddieG
» RE: Bush and Katrina Posted by: mortarthegovernment
» RE: Bush and Katrina Posted by: EddieG
» RE: Bush and Katrina Posted by: Siciliana
» RE: Bush and Katrina Posted by: billfaster
» RE: Bush and Katrina Posted by: mortarthegovernment
» RE: Bush and Katrina Posted by: EddieG
» RE: Bush and Katrina Posted by: mortarthegovernment
» RE: Bush and Katrina Posted by: liberalibrarian
You missed my point
Posted by: Artkansas on Dec 9, 2005 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ultimately, it will be the people of New Orleans that make it happen or not. The main reasons that New Orleans has prospered in the past are not gone. To give up on New Orleans because of what someone is saying is stupid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nope Posted by: jwg
stevenspringfoundation.org
Posted by: hhartman on Dec 9, 2005 3:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My coworker has started a foundation named after his son who died of cancer. His main mission is to bring back music to the musicians who lost everything in the disaster. Visit his website at www.stevenspringfoundation.org. His website is still in its infancy, but I will say that Peter is one of the more honest guys out there, and that his intentions are true. I am sorry to have lost him as a coworker, but I know that we have lost him to a good cause.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New Orleans will soon be irrelevant, hurricanes or not
Posted by: Canute on Dec 9, 2005 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Google up John Mcphee and Atchafalaya for the full story, but here is the basic one: The Mississippi has been trying to hang a right into the Atchafalaya River, about 300 miles upstream from N.O., for about a hundred years. A set of dams and flood control gates called the Old River Project was installed by the Army Corps of Engineers to stop this. Even people within the Corps admit that it is just a matter of time before the dams blow out or get bypassed and the Mississippi heads west, bypassing N.O. It nearly happened in 1973. The lower Miss will silt up, and the Port of New Orleans will be a tidal mud flat. This could happen next year or ten years from now, but it will happen. You can argue with the Mississippi, but eventually it wins. It's too bad for N.O. (and a number of cities along the Atchafalaya), but nature doesn't give a damn about our aspirations

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We Need Your Help
Posted by: cajun on Dec 9, 2005 8:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a lifelong resident of the city of New Orleans and have lost much. We will rebuild our city, it is simply a question of time and money. However there are some things that we cannot do for ourselves ie: hurricane protection. The major defense that the city had against hurricanes was our marshland. That marsh has disapeared dramatically since I was a kid. This is due to several factors: the Mississippi River levees which restrict replenishment of the the marsh and oil exploration, which allowed salt water intrusion. The best data that I have found indicates the each 2 miles of marsh reduces storm surge by 1 foot.
According to the studies of the levees, the responsibility of the Corp of Engineers was not even close to what they were supposed to be.
New Orleqans is an American City and rebuilding and restoration is the right thing to do. We need your help.

Please, if you care about this city, write to your representives in Congress and your Senators. Also we must pressure the White House. I am personally working to rebuild my city but we need your help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey! I'm from New Orleans!
Posted by: Turtle1397 on Dec 9, 2005 8:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was living in the greater New Orleans area when the storm hit. I am not about to sit idely while my city dies. I have much to say about this stuff!! First, the storm was only a Cat 3 when it hit land. Remember how New Orleans "dodged the bullet". The storm was not bad, it was the engineering and failed infrastructure that caused all the damage. Note that the US received a D in infrastructure sometime in the past year. This is the issue that will determine the life of New Orleans. My whole family is there and they will stay and rebuild if they are protected by adequate levies. Businesses will go back if they know that they will be safe.
Second, much of popular New Orleans was unaffected. French Quarter, the Marigny, CBD, etc. All of that is fine. In fact I went and ate beans and rice at the Prawline Connection the other day. The part of town that really was destroyed was the east of New Orleans. This huge New Orleans area was mostly low income African American neighborhoods. Much of that destruction is in the New Orleans no one ever sees. Yet the people living in those neignborhoods fueled the french quarter with workers. Anyway, my point is that the major issue in people actually staying in New Orleans is the levee. The levees stupid!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New Orleans can be raised
Posted by: RadCenterHumanist on Dec 12, 2005 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Considering the trade benefit that the whole country gains from the Port of New Orleans, we all should be glad to pay to raise New Orleans to safety.

That said, some quick calculations tell me that that the job is doable. For roughly $25,000 to $75,000 per housing unit, it would be possible to import fill to raise the whole city to the level of the levees. For the higher price, it may even be possible to raise each structure on a solid foundation before pumping fill in beneath it.

My calculation assumed bringing fill by railroad, barge, and slurry pipeline from a 1000 mile average radius of New Orleans.

Sediment woud be dredged from the Mississippi and from the zone south of the delta.

Mine tailings impoundments and waste rock piles would be removed and the areas they cover restored to nature.
Where heavy metals content is low enough mine tailings could be used as loose fill. Where heavy metals content is higher, toxins could be bound up in concrete blocks made of mine tailings.

Using slurry pipeline and mining technology, the dredged material would be cycloned to leave the sand in New Orleans and deliver the fertile silt component to build up the protective marshlands to the south. Fresh river water would be used to dilute the return salt water flow from sediment dredged from the gulf.

Railroad and dredging improvements, as part of this project, would be a major benefit all those who use these routes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New Orleans Is Back
Posted by: g21guy on Dec 25, 2005 2:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no patience for the nay-saysers. New Orleans is back more than ever. It's a city that America needs and can not abandon. The spirit of its people says as much.

I wrote the book, after all. Katrina & The Lost City of New Orleans. Read and learn.

Regards,
Rod
G21: The World's Magazine

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]