Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rebuilding a New New Orleans

By Sarah Kraybill, Grist.org. Posted November 5, 2005.


A collection of environmental, political, and academic leaders share their unique visions for reconstructing the Big Easy post-Katrina.
Advertisement

Unless you've been living under a rock -- and these days, we can't say we'd blame you -- you've probably put at least a smidgen of thought toward the fate of New Orleans.

It's a rare thing to reconstruct an American city from scratch (though we can think of a few more cities we'd put on the list). There are some who advocate letting bygones be bygones, allowing the name and character of The Big Easy to fade into days of yore, but most people support the eventual rebuilding of the city. The question is, how should it be done, and to what end? We think it should be called New-New Orleans, because that's fun to say, but after that we're stumped.

Instead of racking our comparatively small brains for answers, we turned to a collection of environmental, political, and academic leaders who have bright ideas. We asked them all the same question: What's the one thing you'd most like to see occur as part of the rebuilding of New Orleans?

Their answers ranged from building green to building on barges, from processing with residents to procuring ponies. Read on for inspiration.

Christie Todd Whitman

There's been such a deluge of money, resources, and technical expertise -- I hope that local authorities take just a modicum of time to thoughtfully plan and apply smart-growth principles to the redevelopment effort. For starters, it's quite clear that there's been a lot of development in the wrong places -- not just in low-lying neighborhoods, but also along the barrier islands and coastal wetlands that historically have dampened the impact of storm surges. Local and state officials should seriously consider declaring some of those areas off-limits to development as part of a long-term strategy to restore those natural barriers, and instead encourage more compact development in suitable areas to ensure that there's no net loss of existing homes or potential for new construction.

How we plan and design those new communities is also critical. An obvious priority would be to avoid recreating past mistakes, such as concentrating poor families in just a few wards and isolating them from the greater prosperity of the region. I'm also concerned that we're going to see vast areas of new sprawl development in the rush to rebuild -- exactly the wrong type of development for a time when infrastructure dollars and buildable land are in short supply. Instead, we need compact "walking neighborhoods" that feature a mix of market-rate and affordable housing, convenient transportation choices, and easy access to jobs, medical services, and other daily needs. Smart planning and an open public process can deliver those outcomes. The future of so many families depends on it.

Christie Todd Whitman was the administrator of the U.S. EPA from 2001 to 2003 and co-chairs the national advisory council of Smart Growth America.

Ari Kelman

I suppose the right answer is that I hope poverty and racism -- root rather than proximate causes of disaster -- will be washed away in the outpouring of concern following Katrina. And while I'm stumping to become Miss America, I'd also like every child along the Gulf Coast to have a pony. A really friendly pony that never bites. And can fly.

Inappropriate humor aside, the truth is we're already starting to forget Katrina. There's Supreme Court nominees to squabble over, indictments to ponder, and tears to shed for earthquake victims. Add to that the fact that New Orleans is among the most complicated urban ecosystems in the nation, and it becomes harder still to imagine that we'll maintain our focus for the years it will take to rebuild the city.

It's that last point, about the complexity of the urban fabric in New Orleans, that leads me to what I really hope will come out of this: people should stop trying to separate social and environmental issues as they rebuild. Cities are not simply human artifacts. Nor, of course, are they wholly natural. They're both: networks of human and non-human intermingled, prone to feedback loops across the nature/culture divide.

So rebuild New Orleans on a more solid foundation: the understanding that it's futile to separate cities into compartmentalized zones -- people here, nature there. Such antiquated thinking left New Orleans vulnerable over time, and then under water. Now wring out the city and rebuild it, acknowledging that people must live together with nature. This might yield sustainable urban spaces and a kind of environmental justice. Failing that, ponies are really soft -- and we can ride them out of town when disaster next strikes. Because it will, and if the past is prelude there won't be any gas left for our cars.


Digg!

Sarah Kraybill is an editorial intern at Grist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Hurricane Katrina! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Cautious
Posted by: jlohman on Nov 5, 2005 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, 40% of those forced out say they will not be returning, so whatever is rebuilt can be a helluva lot smaller. These 40% likely didn't have much of a home or job, and perhaps where they are they can start anew. We've split up the gangs; let's leave them split.

What's bothersome to me is that Alaskan contractors are getting contracts to rebuild New Orleans, obviously thanks to their close (and moneyed) relationship with Rep. Don Young (of the "Bridge to Nowhere" fame). He still plans to fight to keep these bridges (obviously thanks to his close - and moneyed - connection to the road contractors).

Whatever is restored in New Orlean should be restored by the locals who need the jobs more than Don Young's contributors. And even then we should not rebuild in the low-lying areas that mother nature has claimed for herself. But before we start sending money to a corrupt city and state government we best send a qualified management team to oversee the project (FEMA, we need you to stay in D.C.).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» AGREE 10000%...Give jobs to locals Posted by: Michiganman
» "We've split gangs"??? Posted by: babywoowoo
Roselyn
Posted by: dayroe on Nov 6, 2005 2:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a New Orleans evacuee, I was totally ticked by all the platitudes above.

How about some concrete poured on the subject:

1. The U.S. Military is requring solar electrical panels on all future military housing. FEMA and the Small Business Administration should require solar electrical panels on all buildings applying for loans and/or grants in New Orleans and make Entergy pay for the excess produced in each business or home as in California. (Many places have to be completely rewired as a result of the flood anyway.)

2. Install water proof skylights which open easily in all roofs so old folks can get out without needing to wield an axe.

3. Make all contracts subject to bids

4. Remodel where possible rather than tearing down.

5. Put a three year moratorium on evictions (rents are jumping 50%). Allow poor people to move back into the Iberville Projects as soon as the solar panels and rewired electricity are in place.

6. Pay the prevailing wage ($10.00 per hour or more) rather than the minimum wage.

7. If Houston could install a complete medical clinic in the Astrodome in 48 hrs., we could have everyone in the country on a single payee medical insurance for less than some people (and some companies) are currently paying.

Lets get real, people. Quit the mush mouth!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Word. Posted by: babywoowoo
Even more cautious
Posted by: John Rice on Nov 6, 2005 2:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First off,,,I love NOLA,,the people, the music, the food, the architecture and the ambiance.
The problem with rebuilding, is the neglect in not considering the effects of global warming, which is estimated could raise sea levels over present NOLA flood walls in less than 30 years, without any storm surge. That is, if not sooner.
I'm concerned that these rebuilding decisions have not taken into account rising ocean levels, and that rebuilding efforts might better take place on much higher ground.
Of course, in order to do that, one would at least have to tacitly admit there was such a thing as global warming.
Nah,,,just another conspiracy theory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wake up
Posted by: cjdrunkwriter on Nov 6, 2005 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are you completely forgetting the caste system upon which this society is constructed? even if you attempt to intermingle the rich with the impoverished, those lines will reappear. nobody gave two s&%ts about the distribution of class and/or wealth prior to this hurricane, and nobody is going to afterwards. every major metropolis in america is organized in the same fashion, they just didn't happen to be far enough in denial to live in hurricane alley without fear.

vain idealists, the lot of you, and it sickens me to see my tax dollars sunk into cleaning up the mess down there - i think i'd almost rather see my money buying more bombs, and for me, that's saying a lot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

let it go
Posted by: SumDood on Nov 6, 2005 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Temporary housing needs to be built and preference should be given to locals for jobs. Those who are indigent or low income need help with financing or rents. Contractors should have to submit bids. I was impressed by the speed at which the Bush Administration hired contractors to rebuild of course avoiding the sealed bid system

That said

Who says the government has to do anything?
Obviously Mother Nature has spoken.

If people wish to rebuild their houses or businesses, they should apply for mortgages backed by NON FEDERALLY FUNDED flood insurance.

Or they can recover whatever they can and move elsewhere, which is apparently what many people are doing.

These coastal areas are prone to hurricanes and that is not something we have recently discovered. Before federally subsidized flood insurance, people realized that it is risky to build on the seashore or below sea level and built 'bungelows'
which were inexpensive buildings one could just replace in the event of a storm.

Now, we have a hurricane and you just rebuild your $500000 house at the taxpayer's expense.

I do not want to help you with your house just because you insist on living in the path of hurricanes, you should bear the risk of your choices.

Hopefully a new New Orleans will emerge which will be smaller and better than the previous version. Many of the slums which were flooded will be gone.

The founders of the city had sense not to build on swampland that is why the French Quarter did not flood

Maybe the country has learned a lesson about below sea level building, we are not the Netherlands and have plenty of room above sea level without building cities on estuaries or in swamps

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Insane
Posted by: NOLAnew on Nov 17, 2005 4:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You must be insane to put people back into the Iberville Projects. It is a haven from Hell. It is not what it was meant to be when it was first constructed. I know I lived and visited there when I was young. Rip it down.

1. Give the poor a chance to get out of the hole.
2. Give the poor an opportunity to pick themselves up.
3. Give the poor something to live for and look forward to.
4. Give them the opportunity to buy.
5. Owning something gives the person an opportunity to have respect for themselves and the property.
6. Iberville projects brings down the French Quarter and Canal Street.
7. Can you say Michigan Ave. Chicago
8. Canal street could be better.

An attitude such as yours only continues the problems and hatered to the people who make up New Orleans. Rodney King questioned "Can't we all just get along?"

I say "Can't we all just get ahead?"

Truely, JIMS

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

House Boats Instead of Trailers?
Posted by: usbusi on Jun 19, 2006 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it makes sense for house boats to be used, rather than single wide mobile homes. Both for FEMA supplied trailers and for homeowners wanting a safer design for the next time New Orleans fills up with water.

I was thinking that a houseboat with one or more strong anchor chains attached to it, the anchor chains cemented in the ground, and also a way to secure the houseboats by anchor chain higher up the chain near the top of the anchor chain, so that hurricane winds do not blow the houseboats over, but that you can then detach the short anchoring, leaving the long anchor lines in place, so that when New Orleans fills up with water, the house boats merely float at the surface, attached to their anchor lines so they don't float away, and when the water subsides they settle back down. Then they are put back onto their properties by cranes and the short anchoring is secured again.

The result is way less financial losses and disruption to homeowners and to the City. Property fences would need to be pretty low or nonexistent, so that when the house boats settle down, they are not resting crooked on a fence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]