Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Missing the Katrina Moment

By Susan J. Douglas, In These Times. Posted October 26, 2005.


The Democratic leadership seems somehow unable to grasp the huge gap in outrage between them and their base.
Advertisement

I recently received a letter from Nancy Pelosi, my close personal friend. Well, at least the letter was addressed "Dear Friend." If I sent the Democrats $25 or more, I would be the lucky recipient of something not available in any store, anywhere--the "Democrats Fighting Donkey Lapel Pin! Exclusively Yours!"

The letter said that the "conventional wisdom here in Washington says that it's better just to go along and get along." But the Democrats were not going to do that, Pelosi insisted. "I am going to work hard and fight alongside Senator Reid and all the Democrats in Congress to make sure we are asking the tough questions" of John Roberts and other judicial nominees. Hmm, I guess that explains Reid's instantaneous puckering up to Harriet Miers and the Democratic split on the Roberts vote.

The letter assured me that the Democrats will "ensure your rights are safeguarded." Which Democrats? The increasingly Republican-lite Hillary Clinton, who, whatever her celebrity status, cannot win the presidency and has sold out on everything from the invasion of Iraq to abortion rights? John Kerry? Joe Biden? As compelling as the donkey pin offer was, I resisted temptation. The letter is now making its own contribution to Ann Arbor's recycling program. When we have to turn to The West Wing to hear a sophisticated dismissal of intelligent design by a fictional presidential candidate, or fantasize about Geena Davis being president, we know just how bereft we are.

There have been the intermittent reports and think pieces about how the Democrats need an agenda, their own "Contract with America," since people don't seem to know what they stand for. Indeed, in my letter from Pelosi, the "demands" that were listed were all about rolling back the excesses of the Bush administration--saying no to privatizing Social Security, stopping cuts to veterans programs and the like.

But where is the bold, pro-active agenda? To create one, they would do well to get out of Washington, fast, away from the consultants and politicos, and talk to everyday people. They would get an earful, and it would be ferocious. The Democratic leadership seems somehow unable to grasp the huge gap in outrage between them and their base. Go anywhere, talk to people who are Democrats or, poor souls, progressives, and the sheer fury of everyday people, if it could be harnessed, would solve this winter's upcoming energy crisis. People are not only enraged; they are also deeply worried.

Hurricane Katrina not only changed things for the Republicans--it changed things for Democrats too. Katrina exposed the nation's continuing failures to combat poverty and racism; it exhumed, from the '70s, awareness of the country's energy dependency and profligacy; it showed that we can move people in and out of a Big Ten football game more efficiently than out of the path of a storm; it showed that you actually need a functioning federal government; and it revealed our contempt for the elderly and the sick. (Indeed, we desperately need an 80-year-old rapper to proclaim "George Bush hates old people.")

So, while it was fun to pop champagne corks when Tom DeLay was indicted, and when the networks, in mid-October, revealed the White House's careful rehearsals with soldiers in Iraq for a supposedly "spontaneous" exchange with the president, the Democrats must see the implications of Katrina for them.

On the Sunday talk shows, various representatives of the party are urging, and taking, the oft-cited advice from Napoleon, "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." When is the last time we remember the Republicans doing this? It is this silence--that comes across as sheer cowardice--that is enraging people and could make a turn to a third party much more attractive to many more people. Pelosi and the lugubrious Reid are reportedly meeting with mayors and governors to develop a strategy for 2006. But where are the meetings with actual people? Where is Howard Dean's barnstorming of the country, with town meetings everywhere, to get a reality check on the passion of the people?

In fact, it is that very passion that seems to scare the Democratic leaders. The Republicans have, in addition to demonizing "liberals," succeeded in marginalizing the party's own base in the eyes of its timid and compromised leaders as too fervent, too far to the left. This is no mean achievement given how much farther out of the mainstream the religious right is. How else can you explain the utter absence of Democratic leaders at the enormous antiwar march in late September?

Hurricane Katrina has created the moment for a true paradigm shift in American politics, because many Americans have actually become scared about what it means to have an eviscerated, dysfunctional federal government. That's what Democrats would hear if they listened to their base, instead of shunning it as their own advisors have convinced them to do. If they miss the Katrina moment, it will go down as one of the biggest political blunders of the early 21st century.

Digg!

Susan J. Douglas is a professor of communications at the University of Michigan and author of "The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and How it Has Undermined Women."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Hurricane Katrina! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It is a two party contry
Posted by: ShaSpirit on Oct 26, 2005 1:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hear people bitching about the Democrats. There are only two parties that can win in any national election. What things to be different? Then get involved and give your local candidates some of that wasted energy.

I see some democrats asking for information around the Leak Story from the Pentagon. Others asking Bush for stuff. It is not a lot I know, but they are also asking everyone to get involved with city or county groups. They need feedback and energy to change what is not working. There is no third party that can win a National election. Sure we can split the vote and help the Republicans stay in office.

How about taking all the anger using it to run for an office. It will take some new blood to changes things. New ideas and new energy is what is called for here. Ask not what your party can do for you, but what you can do for your candidates. It really takes energy at the grassroots level to change stuff. The reason the progressives got things done at the turn of the century was because they started on a local level and build outwards. You want the third Party that can eventually be able to win the Presidency? Then you have to start with the local elections. Go out work to make things happen. Bitching never solved anything. We have had way too much happen to hurt this country in the last five years for us to sit back and do nothing to change things.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, what I am beginning to like about the Dems is their honesty....
Posted by: Pepper on Oct 26, 2005 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
......about themselves and their party. I wish the repubs had that same ability. It might have resulted in change. Regardless, this author is right on about the whiny and "neocon" light dems.

I am actually beginning to believe that Bush is a liberal and the dems like him for what he has done. I actually thought thatthe dems would rise in courage to the HISTORICAL challange that is facing this nation, but alas, I was wrong.

It appears that politics does not attract hero's anymore, rather the innane and unimaginative. I am thoroughly disgusted. Libertarian is looking pretty good lately.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dw13
Posted by: daw13 on Oct 26, 2005 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Agree with the first commentor: don't bitch, get involved. But strategically involved. This means recognizing that the Democratic party at present is run by people determined to insure that it NOT be responsive to the grassroots. These are agents of the same PTB that control the Republican party -- not the Neo-cons themselves, but those they answer to; the Neolib, Neocon cabal that's been in control for the last nearly half-century. What strategic involvement means, in other words, is declaring revolution within the Democratic party; wresting it away from the puppeteers and making it a party of the people at last. Is this doable? Of course. Dean and Soros and Kucinich still constitute a solid base of activism f rom within.

I've been a Democrat all my life, but at this point will not contribute a thin dime to any candidate or potential candidate who does not openly declare non-allegiance to the DLC and their apparatchiks. This means ignoring the incumbent for the moment, and attacking the top leadership of our own party aggressively -- for starters. It also means building, not re-building grassroots organization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dw13 Posted by: Lincoln fan
What they fear
Posted by: feduphoosier on Oct 26, 2005 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are afraid to talk to us, because we can't possibly give them as much money as the corporations are paying them to stay quietly in the pocket. Money talks... the rest of us, walk.

These are politicians. We keep expecting them to be like Abraham Lincoln. Now he was one of us. He certainly didn't go to Yale. I think you get one of these every generation... not sure where ours went, it may have been Senator Paul Wellstone.

Our biggest problem is that whenever we finally get a leader like this - one who really represents us - he/she mysteriously dies. And then everyone quickly crawls back into the pocket and we're orphaned once again.

I don't think its any accident that the guy who said 'government of the people, by the people, for the people' - was one of the people. I do think its sad we'll never realize that dream. What we have instead was 'government of the corporation, by the politicians and for the banks.' Long before there were corporations... there were banks.

These are the pockets in which our politicians live. Notice I'm not using the word 'leaders.' We are at this time in our history... without a leader. All we have left are politicians.

Unfortunately this reality is too horrible for most people to believe. They cling stubbornly to the belief that they - the people - matter to those in power. Katrina showed us otherwise, those with the courage to watch.

Politics have no relation to morals.

- Niccolo Machiavelli

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What they fear Posted by: thehousedog
» RE: What they fear Posted by: feduphoosier
Libertarians
Posted by: memerot on Oct 26, 2005 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Libertarians are the party that:
a) Wants to withdraw from Iraq right away, and avoid other future foreign adventures
b) Wants to end the failed 'drug war' with its huge costs to lives and to taxpayer money
c) Would never approve of government spying operations like Total Information Awareness or the highly useless flight screening system.

So why not join?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Libertarians Posted by: drdigi420
» RE: Libertarians Posted by: mviscid
» RE: Libertarians Posted by: Joe
Soooo, who are viable third parties?
Posted by: mviscid on Oct 26, 2005 8:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the above analysis that says Dems screw the people because they make more money being sell-outs. I voted Green in 2000 but haven't heard much about them since. Anyone got an informed opinion on their capabilities and/or activities? Or how about another 3rd party (that funds social programs, heh)?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"If you don't like the game, stop paying admission."
Posted by: monkeywrench on Oct 26, 2005 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's good to be in Washington: as part of the leadership of the most powerful country on Earth, you get to travel from your exclusive Georgetown or gated-community home to Congress in either a limo or other private car, and move between buildings in the capitol without ever encountering a real working person (other than political staffs). Expense accounts, "comps," or more often, lobbyist favors, cover those gourmet meals at exclusive watering holes; travel is often on lobbyist's private jets, with entourages, red carpets, and fawning subordinates at evey destination; and congresspersons don't even have to work a full week, actually read the legislation that lobbyists are kind enough to write for them, or even show up to vote if grubbing for contributions on the "rubber chicken" circuit is more important (and it usually is...). Yes, life is good in Washington, for both Republicans and Democrats –– and that is the problem.

Like the Roman Senate, our "leaders" are so far removed from the concerns of everyday life that opposition between the parties has become a sort of combination tennis game and minstral show: the ball of faux social concern bounces back and forth between the opponents as they simultaneously hit a few ground strokes and tap-dance for the benefit of their constituents. But at the end of the day, after they depart the court, they know who pays for the stadium and the concessions: corporations. None of them are going to risk being thrown out of the tournament by biting the hand that feeds them, so they count on the spectators, those poor wretches such as you and me, to keep the game afloat by buying the illusion that the competition matters.

I for one am tired of watching the gentleman's sports club that Washington has become. We need a new game – or at least to stop paying admission to the tired one we have now.

I wonder what would happen if all the taxpayers in the country put their tax dollars into a giant escrow account, to be released only after our "leaders" PROVE that they are being responsive to the people, that they are really doing The People's work? I wonder. . . ?

(Because I'm too chicken to withhold my tax dollars all by myself, I'm going to start by not paying another DIME to what used to be our Democratic Party's leadership, until they stop playing the game and start paying more attention to us than to each other. Hey, it's a start. . . .)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who is the base?
Posted by: bookwoman on Oct 26, 2005 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps the problem, for the disconnect, is that, except for the extremes at both end of the continuum, there is no base. There are moderate Republicans and moderate Democrats who move back and forth from one end of the middle to the other and call themselves Independents. From my own experience, I can tell you that many of the angriest, most vocal of the people who are complaining about the GOP response to Katrina are moderate Republicans. Maybe defining the current "base" is what the Democrat's problem really is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kill the weaker party!!!
Posted by: coyote on Oct 26, 2005 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democratic Party is doing nothing but screwing the system. It should be dissolved. The Republican Party is ripe for a split, we should all be over there driving as many wedges as possible into that crack instead of spinning out with the Democrats.
Instead of feeding the Donkey, we should focus on bringing the Elephant down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Two party system.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Oct 26, 2005 3:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like it or not we have a two party system, two parties that are becoming indistinguishable. This is becaue.the folks with the money finance the campaigns of both parties. It is important to remember that you are voting for the party, not a candidate. The party will nominate any candidate that they think has a chance of winning. Therefore, to make changes you have to change the parties. A vote for a third party is useless,even as a protest because the two powerful parties ignore third parties. Right now, both partiies ignore the voters and cater to special interest groups. If you are cynical, disillusioned, or unhappy with the parties consider this: A New Idea

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Two party system. Posted by: ShaSpirit