Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Katrina Reveals America's Other Poor

By Daniel B. Wood, Christian Science Monitor. Posted October 25, 2005.


Congress may waste a golden opportunity to address the nation's long-term poverty problems by cutting back social services to pay for the reconstruction effort.
Advertisement

SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF. -- Willie Ulibarri knocks on the door of a small, ranch-style house set in the scruffy foothills of sagebrush-covered mountains. He greets Teakka Burton and her two children, one of six families of New Orleans evacuees who are getting fresh starts, thanks to Ulibarri's 50-member church. Ms. Burton tends her 1-year-old while filling out an application to cosmetology school.

Minutes later, Ulibarri greets other new faces: poor members of his own neighborhood. "We've got to get you into language classes so you will be ready for job training," he tells Janette Flores, an unemployed woman living just doors away.

"Thank you, Reverend," Ms. Flores says. "With all the attention being paid to hurricane victims, we've been wondering when anyone might get around to helping us, too."

The two visits illustrate the cross-currents swirling around the issue of poverty. The devastating Gulf hurricanes whipped up an immediate outpouring of American generosity -- some $1.7 billion so far for the storms' victims. They also laid bare the United States' longstanding and growing population (now 37 million people) that subsists below poverty level.

Now, in moving to help the former, Congress finds itself in a budget scramble that is likely to trim the very programs that are crucial to the latter. Thus, what many hoped would become a golden opportunity to address long-term poverty now hangs in the balance, say policy analysts, social historians, and those who study the working poor.

"In many ways, it has taken a natural disaster combined with a social disaster for many Americans to see something in their own country which they didn't already see ... namely widespread, grinding poverty," says Doug Hicks, a board member of the Virginia Poverty Law Center. "Now the question is how much momentum will accompany the public outcry ... and in what form for how long?"

At the local level, the lesson has become clear -- as church groups such as Ulibarri's are learning.

"We saw that by looking to take in evacuees, that they needed more than just short-term support but a way to get reestablished in life and regain normalcy," says Ulibarri. "As we did that, we began to realize we need to completely reevaluate ... how we deal with the poverty that is in our own neighborhoods."

The latest statistics are sobering. After much progress in the booming 1990s -- including the dropping of 9 million from welfare rolls after welfare reform -- poverty has returned in force. Starting in 2001, the share of Americans in poverty has increased each year. In 2004 alone, their ranks grew by 1 million. In all, some 12.7 percent live below the poverty line: defined as $15,067 for a family of three.

President Bush called poor areas of the Gulf Coast the "legacy of segregation" and promised bold action to reduce poverty. But with federal deficits mounting, Mr. Bush has put few ideas on the table so far -- and many poverty analysts say the opportunity for a national dialogue is evaporating with astonishing speed.

"We were expecting that in the same way that 9/11 really shook a lot of fundamental attitudes of the American public, that this major event would as well ... but there as yet have been no fundamental shifts in attitudes toward poverty," says Carroll Doherty of the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. A nationwide September poll by Pew concludes: "Americans broadly support the relief effort, but there is no evidence that basic attitudes on poverty and the government's role in addressing the issue have been altered by Katrina."


Digg!

Daniel B. Wood is a staff writer for the Christian Science Monitor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Hurricane Katrina! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
poor
Posted by: walldodger1969 on Oct 25, 2005 4:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as there poor in the world ,there will be poor here, there will always be some one willing to work for less to feed their families,or themselves, And there will always be rich shit christians to take advantage of that fact. Starting with our own congress ,who haven't raised the minimum wage in over a decade. But hey who cares ....JESUS is coming!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Financeing the rebuilding the easy way
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Oct 25, 2005 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our elected ones will no doubt try to sell us all on the idea that taxes will be the answer to the rebuilding effort.Maybe but it will sure leave a bad taste in everyones mouth.Especially all of us who started a civillian relief effort in
lieu of the Feds lack-luster responce. The truly sane approach to rebuilding capital,and the one that won't be done, is for the Feds to offer 'Reconstruction Bonds' and make them inexpensive enough that ALL CITIZENS can participate. Make them a great value too. Have $1,000 bonds sell for $10 so the low income can build a nest egg. $5 and $10,000 bonds for $50 and $100 so folks alittle better off could invest. Of
course the 100 and 1 Million dollar bonds would be $1,000 and $100,000 so the wealthy could participate. The bonds would be transferrable,so your heirs could be involved.
Payable in full in 30 years gaining a locked intrest rate if 5%
per year there after. We could probably realize a greater investment income from the bonds than we can through taxation. As long as we keep in mind making the oppurtunity available to everyone and not just the wealthy. Make the bonds Tax-exempt.It's far eaiser to generate capital if we
create a a good deal for the people to be involved in instaed of a new angst for the 255 Million that live a life that's actually less than the as advertised American Dream.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Socializing poverty and terrorism while privatizing prosperity, peace, and security
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 25, 2005 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All this for the "special interests" against the honest and hardworking Americans who are stuck in the lower/middle class is the role of our current government unfortunately. No wonder the NRA and the same no-bid contractors like Bechtel and Halliburton found it far too easier to exploit Hurricane Katrina to get their wish to further destroy America while folks who were pushing a genuine long term solutions such as fixing the environment and getting our priorities straight by putting an end to the miserable failure in Iraq are persecuted and labelled "unpatriotic". If the Democrats can't get their act together, I say it's time we took the risk of building a new party that truly represents America outside of these two major parties.

Like David Sirota points out, It's time to deliver substance, not sizzle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cheney comes home to roost.
Posted by: Sojourner on Oct 25, 2005 8:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Under Nixon, Dick Cheney began the demolishing of the social safety net in America. Yes, folks, that was some 35 years ago. It had taken the whole of the New Deal years and the post-WWII prosperity of organized labor to build up those protections for ordinary working class folks--another 35 years, give or take a few.

I have been astonished to watch how accommodating voters have been to the process of building the dog-eat-dog world. It's democracy's fatal flaw. So long as the political class gives us bread and circuses (a few handouts and perpetual war) to barely keep things going, we the people are sheep to be sheared.

Whatever happened to "If we don't hang together, we'll get hanged together"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]