Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Katrina's Flights of Fancy

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet. Posted October 10, 2005.


Paranoid conspiracy theories about Katrina are coming from Aryan Nation racists, Millennium Christian fundamentalists, anti-Semitic crackpots and fringe-left radicals alike.
Advertisement

The instant Hurricane Katrina's floodwaters raged down Canal Street, New Orleans' main drag, the tongues of the assorted doomsayers, fringe bloggers, fire-and-brimstone fundamentalists, unreconstructed Nazis and Klan members, leftists, black activists, loonies and even some in the mainstream media wagged furiously.

All claimed that Katrina was the work of sinister forces. In one of the first e-mails I received after Katrina hit, an unnamed informant (they usually are), swore that, take your pick -- FEMA operatives, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Klan or the CIA -- dynamited the levees to, again, take your pick -- kill blacks, steal their land, save the French Quarter and the tourist traps from destruction.

That, or this was a Karl Rove-engineered plot to turn Louisiana into a solid GOP red state.

The problem, though, is that President George W. Bush trounced his Democratic presidential opponents Al Gore and John Kerry in 2000 and 2004 in Louisiana. The state was already pretty red. And the loud noises that accompanied the levees' breaking probably had to do with the impact of water pressure, high winds and power outages, not Navy Seal dynamiters.

Still, that fantasy quickly soared to the top of the Katrina Urban Legends. In the days immediately after the destruction, it would be spouted incessantly.

If blacks could spin paranoid tales of genocide and dark plots against them, a slew of avowed white supremacist groups could do the same. Their Web sites pulsed with their own millennium race-bash warnings. One called for a "cartridges for Katrina" program to ship ammo to whites in New Orleans and other areas to ward off the supposed hordes of black looters and criminals blazing a path of mayhem. Others called for "whites only" tent cities for white evacuees. The more bloodthirsty supremacists, though, were content to gloat over the deaths of blacks and regret that more hadn't been killed.

While the race baiters were the first ones out of the conspiracy box, others soon followed. A big group quickly settled on the notion that Katrina was part of the weather wars supposedly unleashed by greedy oil companies, Bush administration operatives, and the always-favored liberal whipping boy, Halliburton. Their sinister aim was either to hike oil prices, deflect attention from Iraq or ladle out millions in construction contracts to Bush's corporate pals.

Lest anyone think the weather-war theory was confined to musty corners on fringe Web sites, Time Magazine led the charge with the headline, "Is Global Warming Fueling Katrina?"

Though there is no conclusive evidence that rising ocean temperatures have anything to do with Katrina (many scientists attribute it to natural cycles), the fact that Time floated the theory guaranteed that it would be discussed and debated in respected circles. Some jumped all over it and used it as an excuse to take a cheap and free shot at Bush.


Digg!

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is the author of 'The Crisis in Black and Black' (Middle Passage Press).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Hurricane Katrina! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Blame it on God
Posted by: eastcoker on Oct 10, 2005 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow Earl, that last comment was deep.
That is what I have been trying to say down here in the trenches, don't blame it on God. But apparently a lot of people down here are angry at God...
That was quite a creative piece of writing there! It made me smile...I like your use of language.
Hey you know your second to last article where you wrote "Jesus loves you too" about that meth addict? Well that really stuck with me. I have actually been telling my religious friends that Jesus loves the secularists too and my homophobic friends that Jesus loves gays too. That was a great line. I don't know if you were being serious or not, but it worked for me. Thanks.

By the way, I think our conspiracies point to the dismal state of our education system. We aint educated enough. That's where all these crackpot theories come from. Ignorance. What a crying shame!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Add additional crack-pot theories here.........
Posted by: Smiggsy on Oct 10, 2005 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, no, no. It was the chinese gov't that caused the havoc. You see they wanted to destroy an entire US city's supply of cheap chinese factory made goods. This would eventually further boost their economy when more goods would be bought from China via insurance payouts, to replace those stolen or destroyed from the wrecked Walmart stores. Then when all the residents return, they too would have to replace their worldly possessions with chinese manufactured goods and........Come to think of it Walmart were in on the conspiracy as well. Sounds plausable. I bet the waltons family have been stashing all their billions into one of electromagnetic doomsday devices for years now - secretly developed by a mad scientist & a midget on an island in the south china sea. He's got this unique golden gun shaped from a cigar.........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not the full story here Earl?
Posted by: NEWS4A2 on Oct 10, 2005 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In this column, the conspirators are just shadowy and sinister. In his Pacific News Service column, Mr. Hutchinson named names:

Reposted here under Fair Use doctrine:


Commentary: Chasing Hurricane Katrina conspiracy theories only shields the real culrprit

2005-10-10
By Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Pacific News Service

LOS ANGELES -- In the weeks since Katrina hit, the conspiracy theories behind it have multiplied.

The Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan and a slew of activists and bloggers have spun a huge tale of wicked intrigue about the hurricane.

-clip-

To prove their point, the conspiracy theorists cited random remarks made by a handful of tired, distraught and bitter evacuees camped in the Houston Astrodome. They claimed to have heard explosions immediately before the levees broke, and they lambasted Bush and the federal government for their inaction.

This conspiracy theory would have been relegated to a fringe corner on obscure Web sites if Farrakhan hadn't fanned it in a speech in North Carolina on Sept. 12. Last week he added that divers had found explosives under the levees. A clutch of conservative talk-show jocks quickly pounced. Farrakhan gave them yet another foil to use to deflect heat from Bush's bungled relief response. They railed at Farrakhan for stirring black paranoia and anti-white hatred.

There is absolutely no proof that the levees were deliberately blown.

-clip-

The racial conspiracy theorists at least had a suspect to point the finger at, and that was the FBI. For years, the agency waged a disgraceful, relentless, and illegal war against Martin Luther King, Jr. and other civil-rights leaders. That was hardly the case in the Katrina catastrophe. There was no single suspect that anyone could blame the disaster on. Farrakhan declined to finger any person or group that he believed blew up the levee. That would have required hard evidence and the citing of expert testimony to boost the contention that Katrina was an anti-black plot.

-clip-

Copyright PNS

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why not the full story here Earl? Posted by: redstarwraith
conspiracies are real
Posted by: stonefruit on Oct 10, 2005 3:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the hell charges was DeLay just indicted with?! Conspiracy. They do exist. One person's "conspiracy theory" is another person's business plan. But if you keep poo-pooing them, Earl, maybe you'll rise up the left gatekeeper punidtry pecking order to, oh I don't know, The Nation.

Allergic to "conspiracy theories?" Try this one on for sighs.

Hurricane Katrina hits. The levees break under mysterious circumstances. Eye witnesses hear explosions. The preliminary assessment that the storm surge broke them is abandoned by government scientists, although some experts now suspect it was a heaving up of the soil by as much as 8 feet (which would be consistent with military-grade explosives).

Or the levees could have broke from that errant barge that rammed into them. And we'll never know the full story of what happened on Danzinger bridge.

Pundits start speculating on
the obvious: the Kelo v. New London Supreme Court case "legalizing" eminent domain for private gain will be used in NOLA "redevelopment."

AP: Mayor Nagin "wants to allow Las Vegas-style gambling in the city's larger hotels. The plan calls for a large-scale gambling area in the city's central business district, stretching from Interstate 10 on the west to the Mississippi River on the east. Nagin said gambling should be allowed in hotels that have more than 500 rooms."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: conspiracies are real Posted by: feduphoosier
» RE: conspiracies are real Posted by: Scott
More on the "conspiracy theory" of government drug running
Posted by: stonefruit on Oct 10, 2005 3:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
warm seas DO cause hurricanes
Posted by: verite on Oct 11, 2005 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder how meaningless items like this get on Alternet.
I had not heard the blowing up the levees talk before... but the man-made elements of the disaster are more obvious..
diversion of funds from levee maintenance for genocide in Iraq, failure to conserve barrier islands.. uncontrolled oil co and casino and other development draining wetlands and the global warming contribution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: warm seas DO cause hurricanes Posted by: feduphoosier
Warmer ocean temps made Katrina worse
Posted by: craigbob on Oct 11, 2005 4:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Warmer ocean temperatures didn't cause Katrina, they made it more intense. When you pooh-pooh global warming like this, you play right into the hands of those who would have us believe this was a natural disaster we couldn't do anything about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Oct 11, 2005 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rains came down, citizens didn't/couldn't get out, the levees were breached and walls broke and all the "Shit just happened."

For years environmentalists and climatoligists have been voices crying out in the wilderness about the exact scenario we all witnessed in New Orleans.
The New Orleans Times Picayune ran a 5 part series 3 years about the rapidly disappearing Louisiana wetlands and National Geographic 10/04 printed a fictional account of what became reality in the Big Easy.

Do we the people see a conspiracy or do we the people see that those in power ignored the warnings of the 'prophets'?

"We have it in our power to change the world"-Thomas Paine

We the people who believe a democray should care and protect the least among us are doing something to confront this Administration as we raise awareness of the truth not further conspiracy theories which are a harbor for the deluded.

www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

earle hutchinson
Posted by: marysia on Oct 11, 2005 6:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Earl writes: "Though there is no conclusive evidence that rising ocean temperatures have anything to do with Katrina (many scientists attribute it to natural cycles),......" like those who work for the Bush Administration and its sinister, oops, I mean sister agencies. One should remember though, that many other scientists do attribute violent weather to global warming and they have been proven to be right just like most of the left's analysis of post Katrina New Orleans. By the way, those fringe left radicals, just who does he mean by that? If I wanted to read this type of analysis, I would subscribe to Time, not Alernet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: earle hutchinson Posted by: NEWS4A2
» RE: earle hutchinson Posted by: philame
conspiracy theories are "logical"
Posted by: robedal on Oct 11, 2005 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Conspiracy theories arise naturally in the U.S. given

a) the history of the country
b) the delusional thinking prevelant at all levels in the country
.
re a) here is a quote from a recent issue of the New Yorker

"... in 1927, in the midst of the worst flooding of the Mississippi River in recorded history, the white city fathers of New Orleans—the men of the Louisiana Club, the Boston Club, and the Pickwick Club—won permission from the federal government to dynamite the Caernarvon levee, downriver from the city, to keep their interests dry. But destroying the levee also insured that the surrounding poorer St. Bernard and Plaquemines Parishes would flood. Thousands of the trappers who lived there lost their homes and their livelihoods. The promise of compensation was never fulfilled."

re b) Iraq makes the point clearly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

disinformation
Posted by: schnoggi on Oct 11, 2005 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
then again it is entirely plausible that if there were any sort of actual conspiracy of any kind, then certainly the spinners would be sure it was accompanied by all sorts of implausible companions so all conspiracies would seem preposterous. basic disinformation. it is very likely that somewhere in this mess of unlikely goofiness is one very nasty kernel of truth.

there are quite a few of us who despite years of smug snickering still remain steadfast that, somehow, 911 was an inside job. in the face of that, forgive us if we are a little quick to see things moving in the shadows. and calling Halliburton a favorite whipping boy, that's just lame, their hands are soaked in blood and dirty money, if anyone needs a whipping, it's them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This guy sounds like the ones in 1991 when "The New World Order".....
Posted by: Pepper on Oct 11, 2005 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....was laughed at and I remember distinctly, scoffed at because it was the so called Racsists, white supremecists, and all the same so called "fear" named groups that were screaming for people to listen. They were put down as "Conspiracy Theorists". Well, who was right???? And this guy is the rascist from his article. He is the one using race instead of dealing with the "truth" and when every one knows that HAARP is real, Scalar technology and the teslar wave have all been acknowledged as real science.

He should go back and read then Sec of Defense Cohens published speech about new laws (1997) he wanted to prohibit those with "weather modification" weapons from using them. Oh, its real alright.

Its guys like this that have been invasively brainwashing both the left and the right to be afraid to speak the truth. Its hard to find the courage to stand up to this redicule he is promoting and the "stereotypical name calling" that no one wants to be associated with. I am none of the above and yet I have been following this technology for some time now as well as the foundations set back in June 2005 for Katrina, that was named and prepared for the relief funding through the domain registration of the website.

How did they know about Katrina in June 2005???? Watch out for this guy whoever he is. He has just made my list of a new "disinformation agent" of this administration.

Finally, "TRUTH PASSES THROUGH THREE STAGES: First it is rediculed (such as this guy is doing), Second, it is violently opposed, and third it is finally accepted as inevitable." This was written by the philosopher, Shopenheimer back in the 1700's and its apparent much has not changed on the subject since then.

Get rid of this guy. WE can't afford to listen to these jerks against what we see with our own eyes since we are seriously running out of time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Article Author Is Sorta Nutty Himself
Posted by: MarcGarvey on Oct 11, 2005 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems to subscribe to the, crazier than conspiracy theory, coincidence theory of human affairs.

Along with a theory that the Japanese engineered Katrina with an old Soviet device, he calls the idea that govts topple other countries leadership, a wingnut conspiracy idea.

Will someone suggest a reading list to this guy before he opines again on what is and is not real?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

any one got change for a "dollar" ?
Posted by: nellyman on Oct 11, 2005 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lots of opinions here on this one. Doubt if I get my "change" From any one here....(sigh)
Let me know if none of this makes any "sense"....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Earl is oh so typical of the "pundits"
Posted by: Newtopia on Oct 11, 2005 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He guffaws at so-called "conspiracy theories" without refuting them with evidence. He just calls them ridiculous because HE thinks they are. But who is he?

For the record, there is quite a bit of smoke and some fire in the "levee detonation" theory. For one, detonating the "poor" side of the levee did in fact save the richest neighborhoods, and allowed the French Quarter to remain relatively dry. For two, its been done before. But to then belittle the theory by claiming it was orchestrated by Karl Rove, or Bush, instead of local officials, landowners, etc. (in one of the most historically corrupt cities in the nation) makes it suddenly open for ridicule. We must remember that Real Estate is of tremendous value in this country, and it is what has been keeping the economy afloat.

Regarding "Weather modification", I think its been said but Earl needs to do a little research into HAARP and Project Cloverleaf, otherwise referred to as the "chemtrail" project. I mean even the History Channel, bastion of conservative thinking and glorifier of our "good" wars, has done a whole documentary on the HAARP program for weather control. Now, this is not to say Katrina was a HAARP generated storm, but if HAARP is in fact bending the jet stream as it was intended to do, it is entirely feasible that the last couple years of extreme Gulf hurricaine seasons were resultant.

Lastly, Earl does what all mindless pundits and skeptics do, which is to bring in the most ridiculous groups and theories and statements and present them alongside the few that are credible, thereby ensuring none of them are taken seriously. Are there active conspiracies against poor Blacks taking place every day in this nation? Of course, you don't keep an underclass by asking them politely to accept oppression. But that has little to do with what Neo-Nazi's claim are plans for Jewish World Communist Domination. I am kind of shocked I even need to mention this.

Oh, Earl. Maybe you should check out this thing called research. Maybe?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lovely weather.
Posted by: situationgirl on Oct 11, 2005 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The largest lesson I have learned from Katrina is that bad planning can often produce miraculously awful consequences.

That, and reality is no match for our TV culture. How many seasons did "X-Files" run? What's the premise of "The Matrix"? "The Day After Tomorrow"? We're so used to viewing conspiracy theories as pleasure/entertainment that we're loathe to give them up and face the long, hard haul ahead. In essence, our imaginations have created the ultimate distraction through our willingness to believe in any power that relieves us of responsibility of caring for ourselves.

I guess it could also be construed as ultimate egotism.
Nature is a powerful force -- more powerful even than man -- yet we're convinced that we can handle it, defeat it, controll it. Come on, people. It's nature, which is, naturally, uncontrollable. Also, how could we possibly control something we don't even understand? I mean, we've barely gotten the hang of predicting when it's going to snow.

The only true conspiracy I see here is our unwillingness to get to the point: it's going to be a long road back to the Big Easy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And Rita was?
Posted by: moschops on Oct 11, 2005 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that by Alternet standards this article was decidedly low brow. However the conspiracy theory responses take the lowest of the roads.

So Katrina was caused by a conspiracy but Rita was just... a natural disaster? Are you sure that the weather engineers in Texas didn't manage to steer Rita eastwards at the last minute with their super secret weather machine?

It always amazing how many disasters just fly by without any attribution of conspiracy, until some series of random coincidence happens to fit the mold that gets the 'vines a chattering.

Remember the government contractors ALWAYS make out like thieves whenever there's a big disaster, there's no mystery. Haliburtons and their friends party it up every time you fools vote in profligate spenders like Bush who claim they want "small government" but instead replace it with big outsourcing to their buddies. They don't need a disaster engineered for making money, they can just sit back and wait for the government to send them the money by the truckload.

And the fact that the levees were (and still are) actually as much as 10 feet lower than everyone suspect because the government hadn't bothered to resurvey the land heights in decades. Or the tops of the levees were actually reinforced with really crappy engineering that could cause them to just break off with water pressure? Or that everyone knew that even if the levees were good and at the proper height they were insufficient to survive Katrina anyway? If there was any conspiracy it was a conspiracy of fools who decided to believe a "cost benefit analysis" meant it would be better to cross their fingers, whistle Dixie and keep a praying nutin' bad would happen.

But you know what they say - shit happens. And it did. That's all that happened, nothing more, nothing less. And what is more, inspite of tens, if not hundreds of billions going to the area, its probably going to happen again. The only thing that will stop these conspiracies dead will be people acting, for once, like their destiny is in their own hands. Just move the whole damned city inland and let the entire place go to wetlands like it should be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I agree Posted by: blueneck
References on New Orleans Disaster You Might Have Missed
Posted by: glkbreeze on Oct 11, 2005 6:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let’s try to study the issues and avoid name calling, especially the tired old rag, “anti-semitism.” Some hope to silence all free speech with such smears.
The same people scream far and wide about the Arab (Semitic) Threat.
This kind of Orwellian double-think appears designed to silence criticism of any kind.
For Those Who Don’t Read Between the Lines, this article appears is an attack on the leading news coverage by Prisonplanet.com and infowars.com.
These two websites were getting millions of hits world wide during the New Orleans Disaster by those who were seeking the truth.

Here are two audio discussion which discuss some of the issues at hand.
Please see these two website for extensive coverage of the New Orleans disaster beyond what was covered in the controlled media.

Paul Craig Roberts on New Orleans
September 5, 2005
AUDIO
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/050905roberts.htm

Paul Craig Roberts served as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the
Reagan administration.

Alex Jones Interviews Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America
September 9, 2005
AUDIO
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/090905pratt.htm

911 The Road to Tyranny 2hr 2 min Full Length Documentary
VIDEO Go to propagandamatrix.com audiovisual section
See all Alex Jones documentaries at http://www.prisonplanet.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crackpot theory?
Posted by: yesman on Oct 11, 2005 8:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While it may not be possible to link the existence or severity of Hurricane Katrina directly to global warming--weather is much too complex a phenomenon to conform to a one-to-one cause-and-effect analysis--the emergence of stronger and more violent storms is one of the results of global warming predicted by scientists. Such predictions make it increasingly difficult to chalk up more-and-more violent hurricanes to mere coincidence. Certainly, one hurricane does not a trend make, but if we continue to see a growing number of Katrina-like storms in the coming years, we will have to consider global warming to be a likely contributing cause. On the other hand, most of the reasons for Katrina's devastating toll on lives and property have to do with human choices, not nature.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Theory of Conspiracy Theories
Posted by: stonefruit on Oct 11, 2005 8:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
full version here

Contemporary America has a schizophrenic attitude towards conspiranoia. On one hand, it has become the default popular view, one of commodified skepticism towards history and government. This sentiment has proliferated rapidly since the 1960s and Watergate. With the collapse of the reassuring dualities of the Cold War over the course of the 1990s, it has culminated in a pervasive apocalyptic teleology.
On the other hand, the disavowal of conspiranoia has also become an integral part of the conventional wisdom itself, a social technology of control that establishes the boundaries of "responsible discourse” by reflecting elite consensus on the fundamental nature of social reality, in accordance with the elite's own class interests. This makes for an incredibly effective means of establishing ruling class hegemony by controlling dissent, foreclosing alternatives, engineering support, and transmuting the interests of the ruling class into that of the nation as a whole.

One is apt to be labeled a conspiracy theorist for merely suggesting that there is a ruling class that seeks to maintain hegemony, to say nothing of the idea that the ruling class occasionally uses conspiratorial methods. Rather than conspiracy theory, most media and intellectual gatekeepers prefer to view elite behavior through the lens of "somnambulist theory," "coincidence theory," "incompetence theory," or "spontaneity theory." No amount of intellectual gymnastics will be spared to avoid arriving at the conclusion that the rich and powerful, like the rest of us, might possibly act in support of their perceived best interests. This is, of course, in spite of a voluminous sociological literature on the power elite and “elite deviance,” a danger that laws against conspiracy are presumably designed to protect us from.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

KATRINA, BOMB THEORY IS NOT CONSPIRACY THEORY STUPID?
Posted by: gadflysuper on Oct 21, 2005 12:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only a fool or a paid agent whose only intention is the preservation of the official reality, would dismiss out right the bomb theory of Levees as "Conspiracy Theories".

No theory should be dismissed as conspiracy theory unless the person who dismissing it is a proponent of the official corporate version of reality.

Earl Hutchinson better take refuge on the bosom of his white masters. Earl you better watching the news and stop looking at mirror which shows only the image of your white masters. First there was the Collin Powel who espoused Conspiracy theories about the Existence of WMD.

He lied to the UN, He lied to the American people that Saddam had WMD and is about to fry everyone. Still I am waiting for an apology for the loyal house Nigger. 2000 American boys have been killed in Baghdad. Did anybody care? Now we have Earl Hutchinson from his secure place at the House of Lords advising us not to listen to conspiracy theorist.

Let me make it clear for the ignorant facts are not conspiracy, they speak for themselves. Those who act as mercenaries for the Neo-Cons try to confuse the issue by calling any hunch or any request for discovery of facts “Conspiracy Theories” and therefore dismissed.

This was the same trick they used since assassination of Kennedy to dismiss the counter argument to the official version as non-sense. In America journalists have become aligned with power elite and in order to suck up on them they would do anything to get invited to lobbyist circle and get close to power.

Intellects are for sale and intellectual prostitution is a fact of life in America. That at is why there is no challenge to the official prevailing wisdom. Therefore we have to consider that maybe there was something going on, beyond our comprehension. Maybe our intellect is unable to see incidents clearly and therefore some phenomenon could be explained from a different point of view. These are processes of scientific discovery and not “conspiracy theories”!

When the prevailing wisdom is based on conspiracy, distortion of facts, misrepresentation and deception people who see through the web of lies and want to investigate its basis are not conspiracy theorists but scientists in pursuit of testing a hypothesis. These who dismiss them as conspiracy theorists are paid assassins working for corporate capitalism version of truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bombs,not Katrina destroyed the levees
Posted by: gadflysuper on Oct 21, 2005 12:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BOMBS, NOT KATRINA BROKE THE LEVEES

FARHAT QUAEM MQUAMI

Louis Farrakhan, leader of Nation of Islam, has brought a point that when put together with other facts makes sense that one levee was blown-up by explosive materials rather than Katrina. Considering that Katrina now has been re-categorized as a category 3 tropical depression and not category 5 Hurricane and the eye of storm hit Mississippi first and New Orleans on return, what Farrakhan says might be plausible.

Even you don't like Farrakhan you must pay attention that that this might be the perception of many blacks in America about their government. That is why the latest pool shows Bush's popularity nose dived to 2 per cent among black Americans.
According to the E mail that he has revealed traces of explosive have been found. Rumors of explosion have been around and behavior of the Government later on lends credence to Farrakhan’s assertion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]