Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Katrina Wallops Black Voters

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, Pacific News Service. Posted September 16, 2005.


The aftermath of the hurricane could dilute black voter and Democratic strength throughout the South.
Advertisement

President Bush, Karl Rove, and top GOP strategists would never publicly gloat over Katrina's unintended political consequence. But there was a big and potentially lethal one for black voters and the Democratic Party. Nature's catastrophe scattered thousands of poor, black Democratic voters throughout more than 30 states from New Hampshire to California. That could dilute black voter and Democratic strength in Louisiana, and the South.

Black voters make up one third of the state's voters, and nearly one-half of New Orleans voters. They gave Clinton more than 90 percent of the vote in 1992 and 1996. That propelled him to victory over Bush Sr. and Robert Dole, and helped break the GOP stranglehold on state offices.

It also momentarily dented the GOP's Southern strategy. The strategy entailed saying and doing as little as possible about civil rights, actively courting conservative whites, and subtly pandering to the bigotry of Dixiecrats turned Republicans. Presidents Nixon, Reagan, and Bush Sr. (in his 1988 win) banked on that to grab the White House. Transforming Louisiana, with its nine electoral votes, into a crucial swing state, forced the GOP to pour resources, time, and energy into the state to win it.

Though Bush decisively beat Democratic presidential contenders Al Gore and John Kerry in 2000 and 2004, the top heavy black vote for them enabled Democrats to bag many top state and local offices in Louisiana, but just narrowly. A shift of a few thousand votes could tip those offices back to Republicans. The loss of thousands of black votes could also crack the thirty years of unbroken black, and Democratic dominance of City Hall in New Orleans. The streets were barely dry in New Orleans blackest, and poorest wards, when there was talk that a white Republican may challenge black Congressional Democrat William Jefferson.

If the majority of black voters in Jefferson's district don't return, and the likelihood is that many won't, that could make the GOP dream of seizing the Democratic Congressional seat more than just talk. Black voter dispersal could also spell trouble for Mayor Ray Nagin. He grabbed a majority of the white votes in his surprise election victory in 2002. That could easily change in 2006. He's up for reelection, and a white candidate that plays hard on the widespread perception that Nagin, as Bush, also bungled the city's relief efforts could rally white voters.

The future of black vote strength in Louisiana depends on who comes back to the city and state, and when. Many of the mostly white upscale parts of New Orleans received relatively minor storm damage. The voters in these areas will stay, and those whose homes were damaged have the resources to rebuild them. Many of them are Republican. Thousands of poor blacks don't have the resources to rebuild.

Even if many blacks choose to live permanently in the states they relocated to, that could dilute their vote, and further marginalize their political power. To prevent that, the NAACP and other voter groups have called on Congress to pass emergency legislation to extend special protections of the Voting Rights Act, which will expire in 2007, to displaced Louisiana voters.

The aim is to insure that they can vote without restrictions in the places where they relocated. There's little chance that GOP Congressional leaders will do that. They insist that there are enough protections to prevent state officials from tampering with voting laws and procedures. The Act currently requires that the Justice Department or federal courts must approve any changes in vote procedures that involve redistricting, district annexation, registration requirements, holding at large elections, and methods to qualify candidates to safeguard against discrimination.

But this hasn't stopped states from making changes in voting procedures that hurt minority voters. That includes changing, or consolidating polling place locations, tightening voter identification procedures, and adding new and tougher requirements on the timing for filing absentee ballots.

State officials claim that the changes were made to prevent fraud or streamline the voting process. There's no evidence that the changes were deliberately made to thin the ranks of minority voters. Still, if minority voters don't have proper identification, have not been informed of polling changes, or locations, or don't have transportation to get to them, they could be shut of the voting booth. The identification documents of thousands of blacks displaced by Katrina was destroyed or lost in flight.

Even with no polling restrictions, or roadblocks, the vote power of the evacuees could still be crippled. Black political strength lay in their numbers and concentration in key states such as Louisiana. Dispersal reduces them to a blip on the political chart in far-flung states they've ended up in. That further waters down their voting strength, and potential political clout.

Katrina destroyed the fortunes of thousands of New Orleans blacks, while potentially boasting the political fortunes of the GOP. That certainly hasn't escaped Bush and Rove.

Digg!

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is the author of 'The Crisis in Black and Black' (Middle Passage Press).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Hurricane Katrina! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's heartbreaking
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Sep 16, 2005 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After watching what DeLay has done by his own nefarious hand in Texas, to think that Mother Nature may further stacks the odds in favor of his ilk is just heartbreaking.

Florida 2000, Ohio 2004, the Supreme Court, Diebold, Texans for a Republican Majority, California recall, etc, etc.

Can the progressive/Democrat/minority voter ever get a break?


On a much lighter note, The Muse stoops to bathroom humor in today's Made-up-Musing: "Pottygate Overflows"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey Earl!
Posted by: Olympiada on Sep 16, 2005 11:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did you read my comment on your other article?
What about the young male voters in Cali who do not vote because they are so pissed off at the 'system' and the country and the history that they don't give a f**k? What about them? Just forget about them and let them wallow in their resentment and spew forth their toxic bullshit?

I am serious man. I want some answers. Now I know from recovery you can't change other people, but I am telling you we got real problems here in Cali, real problems...I can't be the only one who is concerned about this. Somebody else has got to care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Forgive me please.... Posted by: DavidTbone
» I forgive you Posted by: Olympiada
Let me try again
Posted by: Olympiada on Sep 16, 2005 7:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a rant:

Black fathers who do not vote: what kind of image are you putting forth for your daughters? What kind of man are you teaching them to be attracted to? What are you teaching them about being an American citizen?

Nothing.

That's right: nihilism

Any scholars of black nihilism out there? Come forth, I want to hear from you. I am sick of this bullshit.

Flame if you want.

I do not care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I do agree with you.... Posted by: DavidTbone
More sadness
Posted by: WhatNow? on Sep 16, 2005 7:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have not thought about the subject of this article much yet. Alot of times I think the only saving grace in this country for poor white trash such as myself is the black voter.

I was saddened to lose any respect I had for Powell. I thought he was the most decent human in the bush administration until his statements of support for the administration several weeks ago. I was also deeply saddened to see how blacks in Ohio were almost totally disenfranchised in the last presidential election. It also pains me to have heard of growing support for republicans by blacks in the late 90s and early 00s. I do not know if that is true but it is worrisome. And it really sucked to see the total lack of consideration shown towards Mr. Conyers over his hearing about the Downing Street memo.

This is all just as much a class problem as a race problem. Anybody that thinks that they are immune to the kicking blacks are taking, you better wake up. You may be next.

The civil disobedience and mass marches held by black in the 60s may be the only way all the poor and middle class can be saved.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The question is, what can the Democrats do to regain their base?
Posted by: CrystalD on Sep 18, 2005 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democrats, I've noticed, are great at wringing their hands and whining about how it's always someone else's fault that they keep losing elections. It's Nader's fault, it's the fault of dumb hicks who don't know what's good for them, and now it's Katrina's fault. It's never THEIR OWN fault, oh no, they are innocent as spotless lambs and everything is always someone else's fault.

Perhaps the Democrats should take a good long hard look at themselves and figure out why they keep losing voters. Moveon.org for one has a decent start on trying to revamp the party and Howard Dean's nomination to the chairmanship also is a good step forward. But on the whole, Democrats need to sit down and think - okay, we keep losing elections, what are WE doing wrong?

I think it might be a good idea for Democrats to emphasize economic and social justice issues - minimum wage, infrastructure, working conditions and so forth - real bread and butter issues for much of their voting base. Democrats have gotten sidetracked by "lifestyle" issues. I remember back in '04 those people in North Carolina who also voted for Bush voted for an increase in the minimum wage. What Democrats can do for the Katrina evacuees, and others, is put their own house in order and figure out how they can make life better for working-class Americans. And stop the useless whining about how it's always someone else's fault.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Even Further Cynicism - And Wrong Vote Worry
Posted by: dancerkc on Sep 18, 2005 4:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, to keep on paraphrasing Lily Tomlin, "every time I think it can't get more cynical ...." Yet another mechanism to gut and plunder.

As far as worrying about voter fraud. Voters are not the worry. Voting software, especially claimed proprietary software, is the cheap, easy, smart, hard-to-detect, centrally controlled way to rig votes.

We need full open source - never allow private companies to own (and secret) our voting procedures. And fully open-to-the-public machine designs. Then we need extra means to independently and externally verify the vote including off-site verification challenges by any set of citizen organizations. Every voter should be able to leave the booth with a tabulated receipt of their vote putting challenges on independent ground.

Forget the old way of bribing with cheap booze, etc. Software opens vast and easy-to-steal election mechanisms. Software can easily manipulate itself to look like a close election but still assure the controllers of the machines to guarantee the election along any lines they want. No central control needed per machine, which would add local variations making the fake results look more real.

I've programmed for decades and this is far more frightening in its subtle and secret ability to manage results than the most flagrant vote-buying/and/packing schemes of the old days. -- Unless, of course, you just move the entire troublesome population way away and scatter them. What an opportunity for these creeps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Since When Is Getting Out of the Ghetto A Bad Thing?
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 20, 2005 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Despite all of the tourist PR, the truth is that New Orleans was a dirty, segregated, class divided, poorly educated and crime ridden mess. The Murder Capitol of the US is no place to grow up or raise a family. New Orleans held some of the meanest of "Mean Streets' in our country.

Explain to me how these people, many very poor, are going to get a chance to start over in very different places. Many people of color are now finding themselves located in many places that are overwhelmingly white and are finding open arms and genuine love and compassion from a whole laundry list of volunteer groups.

A little soul in small town Iowa, New Hampshire or Utah cannot be a bad thing and tens of thousands of poor black people seeing that the average white american is not some card carrying racist might do a great deal for race relations in our country. Forget the electoral politics, this could be a chance to make lemonade from a very sour lemon. Open your eyes and your heart.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prominent and wealthy African-Americans
Posted by: cj on Sep 20, 2005 3:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congressman Jefferson could have a real challenge? Is this the guy that tied up some rescue operations to check his house?

How about this: Why don't prominent African-Americans stand up and be counted in order to protect the rights of the poor and the renters of New Orleans.

There are wealthy and prominent blacks in every field--sports, entertainment, business, real estate development, investment banking and professions from astronomers to neurosurgeons. They should get together, say they won't let the poor be run out of town and hire attorneys who know what they're doing to sit at the table and advocate.

They also should research private initiatives that have worked elsewhere or need to be tested. We can't let Bush & Co. control this. The votes will take care of themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Tactic Everyone can participate in
Posted by: L. J. Allen on Sep 20, 2005 7:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I fully understand the frustration with the current party system that many have expressed in response to this and other articles posted by Earl Ofari Hutchinson. Posting in a message board is a great way to let off steam, but sending these messages to your representatives is a much more effective way of letting them know how dissatisfied their constituents actually are.

Now before anyone makes the case that writing to representatives or calling their offices is a waste of time, I would like to add one thing--You won't ever know how much they're B***S***ing you unless you get a response from them in writing. There is nothing like having a written document--namely a signed letter from your representatives--explaining why they either supported or did not support legislation pertinent to your interests.

I understand the need for "prominent African Americans" to stand up and fight the important battles. Yet this sentiment is also part of the problem. Ordinary Black Americans need to make their voices heard if they ever intend to have one. And as much as ordinary folks do not have immediate access to the media, the battles that have been won in the past largely hinged on the masses stepping up to the plate and doing their part, rather than waiting for some superstar savior to make the case.

I encourage you all to visit http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov and simply put in your zip codes to find your representatives. I encourage you to call and write (not email) and load their offices with the sentiments and concerns you express here in these forums. Your representatives are required by law to respond to each and every letter. You may not change the world by writing or calling or genuinely annoying your representatives, but you will at least have a written document explaining where they stand on particular issues. You might actually find out who not to vote for.

Peace,
LJ Allen

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]