Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Bush Helps Disaster Profiteers

By Peter Dreier, AlterNet. Posted September 17, 2005.


President Bush is taking advantage of the Katrina tragedy to get rid of workers' protections in favor of higher profits for politically connected corporations.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

President Bush has been justly criticized for his mishandling of the Katrina disaster, for his failure of leadership and for his indecisiveness. But on two matters involving post-hurricane reconstruction, Bush has been exceedingly decisive. First, he suspended federal rules to allow FEMA and the Army Corps of Engineers to extend no-bid contracts to corporations engaged in the rebuilding. In doing so, he also allowed companies with close political ties to get to the front of the line.

Second, Bush sweetened these contracts even more by suspending the federal Davis-Bacon Act, the Depression-era law that requires contractors with federal funds to pay local "prevailing wages" on construction projects. Through these actions, Bush revealed that despite all the rhetoric about compassion toward the victims of Katrina, the administration's crony capitalism and corporate agenda is never far below the surface.

Katrina is a disaster for the people of the gulf region and for the nation's economy. About 400,000 Americans will lose their jobs, according to the Congressional Budget Office. But for some companies, especially those with political connections, Katrina -- like the war in Iraq -- is a bonanza.

Congress has already appropriated $62 billion for post-Katrina relief and repair, and the figure is expected to exceed $100 billion. The reconstruction of New Orleans and the gulf coast, like the rebuilding of Iraq, has unleashed a feeding frenzy of government contracts to companies. FEMA and the Army Corps of Engineers quickly suspended rules in order to allow no-bid contracts and speed up reconstruction. Politically connected firms like Haliburton, Fluor Corporation, and Bechtel have already scooped up hundreds of millions of dollars for post-Katrina reconstruction.

Haliburton, formerly run by Vice President Dick Cheney, is facing questions for allegedly overcharging on work done in Iraq. The Department of Defense has been criticized for awarding Iraq reconstruction contracts to Haliburton and Bechtel without competition. Since the storm hit, Haliburton's shares have risen by more than 10 percent to $65.

This crony capitalism, rampant during the Bush Administration, is bad enough. But Bush added insult to injury by suspending the Davis-Bacon law for Katrina-damaged areas of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana and Mississippi.

The Davis-Bacon law, enacted in 1931, sets a minimum pay scale for workers on federal contracts by requiring contractors to pay the prevailing or average pay in the region. The prevailing wage in New Orleans is $9/hour for construction work, far below that of most other parts of the country. The Executive Order came a day after a group of 35 Republican members of Congress asked Bush to suspend the law for recovery effort. The Bush administration, Congressional Republicans and their corporate allies have long opposed the Davis-Bacon law, just as they've opposed raising the federal minimum wage from the current below-poverty level of $5.15.

During the 2004 election cycle, the construction industry donated $71 million to candidates for the White House and Congress. Seventy-two percent of those contributions went to Republicans, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan watchdog group. Now it's pay-back time.

President Bush's behavior is consistent. In the wake of the 9/11 tragedy, Bush used concerns over national security as a pretext for undermining workers' rights. His legislation sought to strip 170,000 federal employees being transferred to the new Department of Homeland Security of various workplace protections, including civil service regulations and collective bargaining rights. Similarly, the legislation federalizing about 56,000 airport screeners exempted them from union protections. Soon after 9/11, Bush also established a quota requiring government agencies to outsource at least 425,000 (later upped to 850,000) federal jobs to private contractors (many of which, it turns out, had contributed to his campaign).

In December 2001, Bush also revoked rules prohibiting companies with a track record of violating federal labor laws -- as well as environmental, consumer protection, civil rights and tax laws -- from signing outsource employment contracts with federal agencies.

Now Bush is taking advantage of the Katrina tragedy to get rid of workers' protections in favor of higher profits for favored corporations. The suspension of Davis-Bacon is an open invitation to employers to hire people who are desperate for jobs, and pay them low wages.

Edward Sullivan, president of the AFL-CIO Building and Construction Trades Department, called Bush's act "legalized looting of these workers who will be cleaning up toxic sites and struggling to rebuild their communities, while favored contractors rake in huge profits from FEMA reconstruction contracts."

Indeed, suspending Davis-Bacon is the exactly the wrong move at this time. What the devastated areas need is people with jobs that pay decent wages so they can contribute to stimulating the local economy. Federal funds should be used to help get families back on their feet, not to exacerbate their suffering.

As the reconstruction proceeds, the federal government will not only be rebuilding levees, dams and road, but also subsidizing the rebuilding of the region's low-wage tourism economy, including its hotels and casinos. Three years ago in New Orleans, ACORN (a community group) and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) initiated a referendum -- supported by 63% of voters -- to adopt a municipal wage of $1 above the federal level for businesses with over $500,000 in revenues. The law would have benefited about 70,000 low-income workers, mostly African-Americans, mostly employed in the tourism industry. Those businesses led the opposition to the minimum wage proposal. After the voters approved it, the major New Orleans employers successfully filed suit in Louisiana Supreme Court to overturn the people's will.

These same firms will soon have their hands out to receive federal largesse to rebuild their enterprises. If major hotel and casino chains -- as well as big construction firms -- are going to get billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and government-backed insurance, shouldn't there be some quid-pro-quos -- like requiring them to pay a living wage -- that guarantee fairness for the real victims of the Bush administration's failure of leadership in protecting people from Katrina?

The Bush administration obviously doesn't think so. Even amidst the tragedy of Katrina, Bush's conservatism trumps his compassion.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Peter Dreier is E.P. Clapp Distinguished Professor of Politics and director of the Urban & Environmental Policy Institute at Occidental College. He is coauthor of 'The Next Los Angeles: The Struggle for a Livable City' and 'Place Matters: Metropolitics for the 21st Century.'

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Hurricane Katrina! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
NeoCONomics at its crookedest!
Posted by: SFRosalyne on Sep 17, 2005 2:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, the BushStapo has proven once again that we need not only to keep church and state separate, but also private commercial interests and state must be separated as well. Any business that benefits from such collusion should be swallowed by the government and the officers of such corps bankrupted for life and forced to live on gutted welfare chained to a grocery cart in some big city's Crack Alley for the remainder of their life. After all, their crimes impoverish millions, they deserve the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If it walks like class warfare and talks like class warfare, its not a duck;
Posted by: Sojourner on Sep 17, 2005 2:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...it's class warfare.

Yet we can expect that whoever raises the objections cited in this article will be accused by the Repugs of creating class warfare.

Calling Repug policies by their right name, despite the media clamor and the GOP's umbrage, cannot be avoided. As is repeatedly pointed out, the Bushites are not anti-government as such. They are just anti-government when federal policies protect the middle and working classes.

One of the neo-con refrains that clutters this Web site is that government handouts should not become a crutch. But there's a good reason that the wealthy and governing classes pay a tidy sum to the lobbyists for their special interests. They have successfully harnessed our government to work in favor the investor class.

Those who least need the help are receiving the greatest handouts of tax breaks, which then lay the heaviest burdens on the struggling underclasses. Those who pay the least taxes are receiving the greatest amount of government benefits. I'd much rather have a government contract than a welfare check.

In other words, the Repugs are busily ensuring that the US will soon have an old fashioned Marxist proletariat. That is exactly what FDR's New Deal set out to avoid, and it succeeded. Now the Repugs want to turn back the clock to the good old days of elitist domination.

While history does not follow an inevitable pattern, anyone can see where exploitation of the middle and working classes leads. Although the late Supreme Court Justice Lewis F. Powell argued in the early 1970s that the New Frontier and Great Society programs of the Demos were dangerous, he should have pointed out that robbing the poor to give to the rich is a disaster in the making.

It leads to social discord. And nothing is worse than that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» An eloquently stated warning Posted by: rockpicker
This is reminding me of 9/11's aftermath.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Sep 17, 2005 4:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again the governement's inaction or poor reaction is hurting us as a whole while benefitting a very small minority who need little if any help. Was this an anticipated disaster? It's been excellent in killing the poor and in practicing martial law.

"subsidizing the rebuilding of the region's low-wage tourism economy, including its hotels and casinos."

Sadly, I figured this was going to happen. I do not like paying taxes to promote development in risky areas. This disaster exposes what a folly it is to build so much in such dangerous places. I think this is a good example of why zoning regulations should be changed to discourage building within several miles of the gulf coast. We, the people, should not have to subsidize businesses being built on the coast.

Is there a way I can incorporate myself? If so could I receive government contracts? I want the rights of a corporation. They seem better than individual rights. This should not be so. I rather become a church though. They really have it made now. They get representation without taxation, the best of both worlds. If we are not the most disgusting of industrialized (maybe that should be servicalized :-) ) nations I am pretty sure we must then at least be the laughing stock of most other developed countries.

Thanks Alternet for once again displaying how cold and cruel the bush administration truly is. I long for the day we can become a nation of people instead of business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I live in Gulfport
Posted by: heathen55 on Sep 17, 2005 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and work on a military base here. I can tell you for a fact that Kellogg, Brown and Root has taken over a giant warehouse and filled it with "relief workers". They have a galley tent set up (with AC) where their employees eat steak, lobster and other delicacies daily while the military chow hall struggles to provide basic meals for the rest of us. Also, my advice is to NOT donate to the Red Cross. Their response here has been pathetic. I have yet to talk to anyone who has successfully connected with their 1-800 number for relief services, but those who have left the state to apply have been serviced quickly.
In general, this area resembles a war zone. My apartment building was completely destroyed by the tidal surge. My son and I found his bike and 2 of our golf clubs and that was it. People are living in tents on their former home sites, and as yet the FEMA trailers have only just begun to trickle into the area. Not pretty, but we on the Gulf Coast WILL be back.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great analysis Mr. Dreier.
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Sep 17, 2005 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reprehensible tactic of the Bush Administration is to use disaster to play out its big business agenda. Here's another example, after their flip-flop on support the creation of a Department of Homeland Security they insisted on using it as a vehicle to undermine civil service.

I was incensed a few weeks back over Pentagon retribution against a DoD contract manager who had the temerity to question Halliburton contracts in Iraq. Different subject but same theme, the piece is loaded with links outlining the depth of Hallburton's corruption. You've inspired a reprise...

The United States of Halliburton

Over the weekend (when the Bush Administration is at its most nefarious because most of America is preoccupied with getting drunk at barbeques or running from hurricanes), the Pentagon demoted the Army contracting official who criticized massive, noncompetitive contracts that Halliburton received for the reconstruction of Iraq.

The move demonstrates, to paraphrase the Administration’s tired mantra on fighting terror, that “we will move heaven and earth to find a low-level minion to blame for every gargantuan screw-up we commit.”

It’s easy to see why the Pentagon is singling out Bunnatine H. Greenhouse for punishment over her criticism of Halliburton. The woman is surely in the grips of a full-blown fantasy.

After all, Halliburton hasn’t been so bad. To date, there have been just a few glancing blows against its performance. The Pentagon Inspector General concluded that its record keeping was so bad they couldn’t even determine whether contractual obligations were fulfilled. The Defense Department’s criminal unit is investigating its activities. The FBI is checking whether Halliburton’s KBR subsidiary illegally received military contracts and the GAO has found “multiple” contract abuses....

full article

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blog of Lisa Finnega on War on Poverty!
Posted by: farhada on Sep 17, 2005 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One important issue most people did not mention is the fact that Bush change his previous view on War On Terror and the root cause of terroris.

Lisa Finnega, the writer of the book “No Questions Asked: What the mainstream media didn't tell you and why.” wrote about it in her blog at: War on Poverty

The President’s recent UN speech linking the war on terror and poverty is a belated acknowledgement that the “war on terror” is nothing more than a slogan, like a war on drugs, poverty or crime.

The president has acknowledged what the media should have noted years ago – that it is impossible to stop terrorism by dropping bombs and invading countries.
……
The freedom Bush bragged about has become tenuous in the U.S. and abroad. Personal records – bank statements, library records, private e-mail messages, phone conversations and more – can be monitored by the government under the USA Patriot Act.
…….
In Iraq, people live in chaos and poverty. In Afghanistan, people live in chaos and poverty. And, in the U.S., people live in chaos and poverty.

What is the result of the administration’s declaration of a war on terror?
……..
It makes the president’s recent proclamations of hope seem hollow.

“There can be no safety in looking away or seeking the quiet life by ignoring the hardship and oppression of others. Either hope will spread or violence will spread, and we must take the side of hope.”

Four years after that passionate speech about “our freedom” and the “evil forces” who hate “our way of life”, George Bush has destroyed almost everything that America stands for both nationally and internationally.

If the result of a war for our freedom was that we lost most of our freedom, God save us from the result of a war on poverty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Davis-Bacon is a Pork Fest for Union Construction
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 17, 2005 8:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can remember back in my Army days of construction at Ft Campbell, Ky and other bases being done by New York and California firms with HEAVILY INFLATED wage scales. All Davis-Bacon did was eliminate any wage advantage local bidders had in favor of a handful of large 'Closed Shop' firms that could then bid all over the country for jobs at the expense of local & regional firms. It also guaranteed the taxpayers would get stuck with the absolute highest wage costs for any construction job. Suspending Davis-Bacon will improve the chances of local workers being hired instead of the 'usual suspects'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

america disfigured
Posted by: The Butcher on Sep 17, 2005 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
am just looking for the most vicious way to attack you guys.
reading your nonsense hysterics everyday.
going around in circles.
hoping alternet offered relief from your global oppressionsssss
your mc donalds, musicssss,rapshitss, popular shit dominance, but heck. every second mail on this alternet rag is about god and prayers and this claptrap.
sure there are smart people contributing but hell i despair about what you are doing to the world.
I met america in the 70's. then you were leaders and progressive.
i do not recognize what I read on these pages.
Beati Pauperes Spiritu.
You collectively have no guts.
You are a pathetic people crying victim.
I loathe what you have collectively become. No more spine than warm lettuce.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: america disfigured Posted by: mrsmagoo
» america reconfigured Posted by: cold2touch
america disfigured #2
Posted by: The Butcher on Sep 17, 2005 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NO and its tragedy, those second class citizens yopu so gladly ignored, NO has become the asshole of the world.
We are all watching in dismay the cowboy. You have fed the rest of the world all your shit and liberalism thru your guns,films, music...
Now what?
How does it feel?
I am just one of millions of people around the world loathing your country. I am not a muslim, I am not european. English is my third language. I am not black either...
I am white, middle-class, educated and very very anti-american as I think you guys will destroy the planet.
So before you do, I am making sure you know you don't have many friends out there.
You are despised.
Vive l'empire!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

america disfigured#3
Posted by: The Butcher on Sep 17, 2005 9:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Land of opportunity... yeh right
Wallstreet is screaming how well you are doin'
5% unemployment... whoooooahhhhhh!
Germany /France ? over 10% Booooohhhhhh!
GDP USA 3% or more! whoooooooaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!
GDP Germany etc... 1.5% BOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHH!
Our system works guys!
Poverty in USA 24%
Poverty in France 7%... but they are commies.
Conclusion:
If I'm black in France, i am discriminated against but I can still access Health, Schooling and minimum help.Even if I am not a citizen.
In america.......Even if american, I can't....
You can access these figures on any sites.
Being stupid americans, you probably do not read anything but american sites.
Wish you good GDP growth and precariousness ! You Phonies.
Good Shame!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: america disfigured#3 Posted by: gazevans
Doing Business with Hallibuton
Posted by: pitbunny on Sep 17, 2005 2:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is happening in the rebuilding of N.O. is that Halliburton and Bechtel are being used to execute large, vague, non-bid and cost plus contracts. Meaning they are delivered large sums of money with little accountability and more money still if they request it. Effectively, the gov't is abdicating its auditing and review functions to Halliburton and Bechtel. The oppurtunity for discrepencies, over-charging, and outright fraud are obvious given the example of the Iraqi War where billions have evaporated. This type of business arrangement calls into question the sincerity of an administration that demands accountibility from poor school districts and children in overcrowded classrooms nationwide before "no child left behind" kicks in additional funds. I don't have a problem with necessary work being contracted, but there is a distinct and urgent need for copious scrutiny in money spent for the product delivered. The Bush Admin. & Cronies are looting the treasury with these non-bid contracts that, judging from the failure of contractual performance in Iraq, are over-priced failures to perform.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just out of curiosity
Posted by: SBK on Sep 17, 2005 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is there a progressive response that is akin to the Heritage Foundation Plan? A policy think tank point by point on how we would rebuild if we had control of the cash? More than just cries for a New Deal or new WPA but a plan for economic development in the area leftist style....restoring wetlands, training evacuees for reconstruction, energy sound building, advanced public transport and the like? Has anyone seen anything like this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: just out of curiosity Posted by: honeyrose
Bush's Action is Probably Illegal
Posted by: Stephen McArthur on Sep 18, 2005 4:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Project on Government Secrecy of the Federation of American Scientists has given us evidence that Bush's action to limit wages is most likely illegal.

Here are the facts:

Orwell's Grave

Read the piece entitled "Bush Wage Cuts For Relief Workers May Be Illegal"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a good site to bookmark
Posted by: rockpicker on Sep 18, 2005 7:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a considered opinion concerning intelligent redesign of the Gulf Coast, check out James Kunstler's website.

http://www.kunstler.com/mags_diary14.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

windy
Posted by: jcutler9 on Sep 19, 2005 3:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The point is that suspending Davis-Bacon does not save the taxpayer money, as Bush infers. Because the contractors will still get the same amount of money, they just get to keep more profit by not paying fair wages to their workers, thus perpetuating the virtual slavery and poverty of area workers and assuring they will be unable to buy houses or pay rent for decent housing, much less to buy cars to escape the next hurricane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thank You! Posted by: kww355
Frankenstein's Monster
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 19, 2005 4:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like Frankenstein's monster corporations were given life. Like the monster these "persons" are created without a brain, without a conscience, and without a soul. Again, like the monster, they are running amok, and must be destroyed. The body is useful and should be preserved. Giving the corporations legal rights was a mistake. Corporations should have revocable privileges. Like broadcasting corporations they should only be allowed to operate in the public interest. Their actions should be periodically reviewed and privileges extended to those corporations deemed useful. When they engage in antisocial behavior they should be liquidated. This will never happen while special interest groups control the government through campaign contributions. Take action today. Join the revolution

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Opposition to Executive Order
Posted by: honeyrose on Sep 19, 2005 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone know of any organized effort for a petition in opposition to this unconscionable executive order? Vehement disapproval of the planned cuts for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting were effective. An outpouring of public opinion could force a change on this issue too, based on the fact that GWB is in a vulnerable position right now on the issue of hurricane response and uh, compassionate conservatism. Please post if you are aware of any groups that are involved in organized citizen response. I looked at MoveOn and AFL-CIO sites. Nothing there for effective action to bring at least some pie crumbs to the little people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So what are we going to do about it?
Posted by: Riverside on Sep 19, 2005 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reportage in Alternet is first rate, and it is clearly documenting just how far this nation has been corrupted and how rapidly we are sinking in the eyes of the world.

So, are we in overload and can't handle all the "stuff" that is happening? Have we been stunned into inaction or worse indifference?

The 2006 elections are coming up. Are we just going to let them slide buy again or are we getting organized and begining to back candidates that can help save America. PLEASE NOTE: These good candidates can be either good Republicans or alive Democrats so don't let party allegiance stop you. Keep in mind that there are a growing number of Repubs in Congress who just might jump ship to a new, and more trusted party. Keep in mind, though, nobody is going to jump unless there is a solid landing spot on the other side.

Let's get busy and save America before it is forever too late. You do love America, right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The sleaze continues unchallenged.
Posted by: packofwolves on Sep 19, 2005 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Bush's conservatism trumps his compassion." I don't think this is a matter of convervatism -vs- compassion, this is a matter of greed, pure and simple. Bush has no compassion, he is as cold-hearted and as slimy as they come. What I wouldn't give to see him and his family and all of his cronies get a taste of their own medicine from the other side of the fence. People who make the rules should have to live by them. And what are we paying Bush to be president? I can assure you it's wasted money. We are paying for this sleaze-jerk to ruin our country and take us back to the dark ages, all to line his financial backers with more money. At what cost? But it's not anyone's fault but our own because we are allowing this to happen without challenge. We are watching Bush and his cronies rape our country, cheat our countrymen and women and we just sit back and complain. There's isn't anyone who epitomizes what's wrong with this country more than the Bushies. In fact, I'd almost say that the Bushies are probably the most evil people I can think of. Our country needs to be exorcised.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Protest the Exec. Order HERE
Posted by: SbgBJ on Sep 19, 2005 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Honeyrose was asking about a site where you can protest the Bush exec order:

http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/post_Katrina_attack

There it says, among other things:

"Dear Working Families e-Activist,
President Bush is still failing those hurt by Katrina. We can do better. 

President Bush and his allies are using a human catastrophe to lower wages and limit help for survivors while awarding no-bid contracts to rich contractors.

We can’t let this go on. Hurricane Katrina survivors need real help—and America needs priorities that reflect our values.

The Bush administration failed the people of the Gulf Coast in the days after Hurricane Katrina struck. And it’s failing them again. Bush and his allies are using Hurricane Katrina to push through a radical agenda that it cannot get enacted otherwise. They are pandering to political friends and rich contractors at the expense of the hurricane’s survivors.


Last week the president announced: "We have a duty to confront this poverty with bold action." Yet in his first decisive act after the storm, Bush issued an executive order taking wage protections away from construction workers who will rebuild the Gulf Coast. Katrina exposed gaping economic inequality—people who couldn’t afford to evacuate New Orleans suffered horribly and, in too many cases, died. Robbing workers in the area of decent wage standards will make it that much harder for them to recover. It will be a real boon, though, for the unscrupulous contractors who will reap windfall profits at working families’ expense.


We can and must do better for those ravaged by Katrina. We’ve got to reject the Bush administration’s twisted priorities now. Please contact Congress—click on this link: ..."

Beth in Salzburg AUSTRIA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

“The fiendish efficiency of the Repugs . . .”
Posted by: shangrilalad on Sep 19, 2005 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“The fiendish efficiency of the Repugs . . .” this remark by Sojourner brings to mind the fiendish efficiency of the Nazis. Are we are headed in that direction?

Have you ever wondered why the Repugs have so successfully dominated the national agenda for the last quarter century?

We are not a democratic country, we are a plutocracy ruled by the Warlords of the military, industrial, congressional complex. Domination, Corruption, and Self- Perpetuation is their National Policy.

Repugs use fear to pander to the basest impulses of the people: Intolerance, selfishness, greed and hate. The dark side of human nature. People are much more likely to fight for their own self (selfish) interest than for the common good. Unless Americans evolve beyond this primitive mindset, we are doomed as a nation.

And it doesn’t help that as Will Rogers said, “I don’t belong to an organized party, I’m a Democrat.”

It’s time to clean house.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Money and Democracy
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Sep 19, 2005 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Crony capitalism is a more serious problem than the grossly unfair distribution of wealth. It is a symptom of the failure of demcracy in the United States. Political donations and lobbying completely undermine a fundamental democratic principle, namely that all citizens should have equal political power. That means that no citizen or entity has more input or influence on decision-making than anyone else.

Political campaigns are extremely expensive and in particular the presidential campaign making corporate donors a necessity for a successful campaign. Corporate donations lead to a business-friendly government and make it impossible to succeed without them. Ordinary citizens have virtually no power unless they can organize into a large group and mobilize public opinion.

Lobbying causes the same sort of problem. Lobbyists have tremendous influence and often determine public policy. Lobbying should be completely banned. There are other methods for obtaining public input into decision-making.

There is no democracy in the United States. At election time there is a choice between two business-friendly parties and between elections these parties discover how to remain business-friendly through lobbyists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Redistribution of Wealth
Posted by: rkewen on Sep 19, 2005 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an excellent article and it is followed by some very thoughtful and perceptive comments. As much as the right wing conspiracy of Greed likes to harp on the evils of welfare dependency and the redistribution of wealth, their only real concern is that it is redirected in direction they think is right, into the pockets of the corporate elite and already obscenely rich.

As was pointed out above, FDR and his New Deal was an attempt to correct the inequities of the Robber Barons and the Gilded Age and the excesses of the 1920's that led to the Crash of '29 and the Great Depression. Ever since Ronnie Raygun though, the party of greed (G(reed)OP), has been on a roll and have been successful at picking the pockets of the poor, working people and what used to be the middle class.

Hopefully the silver lining behind the terrible tragedy of Katrina and its aftermath will be to open the eyes of much of the Bush Crime Family's "base" to how they are being fleeced in the interest of the Bush Crime Family and their cronies.
These guys make Boss Tweed seem like an eagle scout.

I'm always amazed at this administration's unwavering support of the NRA, because eventually, once people are tired of being robbed they will rise up, that was one of the concerns that led FDR to create the New Deal in the first place along with a desire for some true social equity and justice. Even the French, who middle America likes to think of as chickens, got to the point where the majority of people said ENOUGH. I don't know how many Americans are knowledgable about the French Revolution though, it is patently obvious they don't even understand their own and the principles it was fought for or they wouldn't sit idle and watch the people they vote for take away the freedoms and rights that the founders fought and died to win.

We need some politicians like FDR and Huey Long again!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hope this plan backfires
Posted by: bookwoman on Sep 19, 2005 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1349, the Bubonic Plague struck England and wiped out something like 60% of the population of the British Isles before it was over. As a result there were not enough people to perform the work which needed to be done after the epidemic passed. The serf system fell apart, and, although a Peasant's March was put down, this was the beginning of the rise of the Middle Class in England which led to a lot of changes over the years. I make this point only because the people who will be needed to rebuild New Orleans aren't there anymore. They have been relocated all over the country. Fill in workers don't relocate for peanuts. They go to where the work is because the pay is above standard. If the rules have been changed and union wage levels don't have to be paid, not many people are going to go to New Orleans to help rebuild. Lots of jobs - few workers will cause the supply and demand factor to kick in. These contractors and others may end up paying more than they would have under Davis-Bacon. We can only hope so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hope this plan backfires Posted by: rotorooter
from Marat/Sade
Posted by: rockpicker on Sep 19, 2005 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...four years after they ended fighting
Marat keeps on with his writing.
Four years after the Bastille fell,
he still recalls the old battle yell!
'String up all of the ruling class,
Throw all the generals out on their ass!'..."

Four years after the Revolution
and the old King's execution,
four years after, remember how
those courtiers took their final bow...

As Sojourner warns, this chaos is not to be wished for, but it's as predictable, given current policies, as the disaster along the Gulf coast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

from thenation.com
Posted by: rockpicker on Sep 19, 2005 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"On March 17, 2003, two days before the US invasion of Iraq commenced, four protesters--now known as the "Saint Patrick's Four"--entered a military recruiting center near Ithaca, New York, and poured small amounts of their own blood around the building's vestibule in a symbolic protest against the coming invasion. By their own account, they were alone in the vestibule and no one was prevented from entering or leaving the center.

For this act of non-violent civil disobedience, the longtime Catholic peace activists--sisters Clare and Teresa Grady, Daniel Burns, and Peter DeMott--have been charged with conspiracy to impede "by force, intimidation and threat" an officer of the United States along with three lesser offenses. If convicted of federal conspiracy in a trial starting tomorrow, September 19, they face up to six years in prison, a period of probation and $275,000 in fines. The trial is the first time the Federal government has pressed conspiracy charges against civilian Iraq war protesters. The obvious intent of the wildly excessive indictment is to chill antiwar dissent."

Let's see how Bush/Rove handle the coming anti-war protests in D.C. My guess is, either it will be a bloodbath, or the press will refuse to acknowledge its existence. Like the town hall non-events of July 23, which even NPR refused to report on. Was anyone else out there surprised and outraged to see so blatant an example of the press locking arms in solidarity with the administration?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: from thenation.com Posted by: shangrilalad
When The Bush Cabal Pulls A Rabbit Out Of Their Hat
Posted by: doneman2000 on Sep 19, 2005 4:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's for a reason. These people do NOTHING without a reason. Almost invariably with this type action there is big money involved for campaign contributors. As with most GOP approved actions it involves phucking the little guy so the "phat kat" can get fatter. Halliburton has already stolen hundreds of millions of dollars from the taxpayer in Iraq, I would expect them to do no different here, why should they? Mr. Bush and his GOP cohorts have left government as big as ever. Their only changes are making sure the ones who need the least get the most. It's robber-baron mentality plain and simple. Under normal circumstances I would say it's a policy already proven to fail and yet with the propaganda network the GOP has at their disposal, along with ideas like the "Patriot Pastors", a group of ministers who know which is the party of God and thereby go to their flocks with Gods message to vote GOP. Goddamn them all to Hell phucking hypocrits. Ready to defend the unborn when 8 million people, mostly children, die each year from nothing more than being poor. Party before country, the wealthy before the masses, Gods hypocrits before Gods children, that's the modern day GOP. Phucking mindless sheep..........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement