Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Winners and Losers: The Usual Suspects

By Stephen Pizzo, News for Real. Posted September 13, 2005.


Look who's getting off easy in 'rebuilding' the Big Easy: the same companies that have been getting fat off rebuilding Iraq.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

We know who always loses when something goes wrong -- the poor. They're used to it. Only those with money expect the government to be Johnny-on-the-spot with help when life goes sideways on them. The poor, like those stuck in the muck in New Orleans, may be angry, but they are hardly disillusioned. Being left to drown and rot during a hurricane is just same-old, same-old for the losers among us.

And then there are those who always seem to win when something awful happens. They're used to that, too. A war breaks out someplace and it's, "Great, get the rebuilding contracts ready. Not to worry, they're already pre-signed." Because if there's anything the US government can do fast, it's hand out money to those who share come election time.

And so it came to pass in Iraq, and now in New Orleans. Look who's getting it easy rebuilding the Big Easy. You may recognize them because they are the same companies that have been getting fat off rebuilding Iraq.

The usual suspects: Bechtel, Fluor, Halliburton.

It's all in the family, really. Halliburton's Kellogg, Brown & Root and another company tapped to rebuild N.O., Shaw & Co., are both clients of former FEMA head, and Bush fundraiser, Joe Allbaugh. You might recall, Allbaugh was the guy who got the current FEMA director, Mike Brown, the job. They were roomies in college. Old School, you know. These chums are now first in line to tap the first $100 billion in rebuilding funds.

I'm not surprised, and neither are any of the thousands of poor homeless families standing in line for the basics of life in relief centers. Now they just have to wait and watch as the nice white men are going to rebuild their city.

The big question now is, whose city will it be once they are done rebuilding it? Already the winners are working to set up vast trailer cities out far from New Orleans. The losers suspect those relocation camps will end up being their "new city," not New Orleans. (One local leader remarked last week, "We've been trying for 25 years to get rid of those public housing projects, and it only took Katrina a hour to get the job done.")

But hey, New Orleans is one helluva franchise -- a real potential gold mine. That is, if the winners can just clean the damn place up. All the French Quarter needs is a bit of buffing up by Disney Corp. to transform it into a "family friendly" vacation destination. But those poor areas need a total do-over. Imagine hundreds of thousands of quaint yuppie condos, walking distance to the French Quarter. Man alive, a developer could get $300,000 a one-bedroom for one of those puppies. They can almost smell it, especially now that the former "bad elements" are hundreds of miles away cooling their brown heels in tincan houses in some Georgia pine forest.

And look who's first at the "give me" trough down in Mississippi -- the casinos. For years casino interests have fought a state law that required their gambling palaces float. Now they are about to get the right to build them on dry land. Whose dry land? Can you spell "imminent domain?"  The Supreme Court has already cleared the legal path for local officials to decide that if a loser's house is in the way of something more lucrative, the house goes to make room for the lucrative.

So it was urban renewal. Messy, brutal but effective. A Category 4 wrecking ball of a hurricane. A gift to the winners from a loving and compassionate God. Intelligent design, in action. (Ironically, it may have been the winners who gave us these super hurricanes too by denying that greenhouse gases cause global warming --- just as tobacco companies denied smoking was addictive and caused cancer, even though they knew it was and did -- felon see, felon do.)


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Stephen Pizzo is the author of numerous books, including "Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans," which was nominated for a Pulitzer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Hurricane Katrina! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We are a nation of suckers, and enablers
Posted by: greekTowner on Sep 13, 2005 3:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes sir...I am not giving one dime to any charities.

What a scam.

They have no shame with the bombardment of donation requests.

It is same-old marketing below the guilt trip.

Where do you think those first $60 billion come from?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Split among thieves
Posted by: pkrf_A on Sep 13, 2005 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I totally agree with your article !!!! Both parties are the same chronies of the big corporate well fare. The best recarnation of all this is Delay !!!! Need I say more?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ECLECTICIST- S JIM RODRIGUEZ
Posted by: SJR505 on Sep 13, 2005 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" DOE ANYBODY KNOW WHAT TIME IT IS...???" DOES ANYBODY CARE...???"

We all have to remember that we live and are a " Capitalist " nation and for media purposes a "Democratic " nation... Further, one can visualize the money hungry Americans under the banners of "less government, conservatives, god-fearing, church-going, elitists, etc , shouting from the rooftops as they stuff all their pockets with dollars.."LET THEM EAT CAKE..."

Yes, I do agree about the enabling part, but as a "Christian" I refuse to let any of my family -neighbors,friends, colleagues, associates starve to death or die without my taking the time to support them during their most immediate needs...My boss is the son of a carpenter, and his judgment is who I value the most...

And, remember that there are three things politicians value the most : 1) Money ; 2) Money; and 3) More Money...

S...JIM RODRIGUEZ+++EL ECLECTICIST+++
333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Plutocracy
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Sep 13, 2005 4:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that we are all being played for suckers. The wheels of the American political system have always been greased with money. Theoretically, in a democracy everyone has equal political power. That means equal access to decion-makers and equal input into policy-making. The American system is at the other end of the spectrum where only money determines political influence. Between financing political parties and hiring lobbyists, the corporate elite have all the political power. The name for such a system is plutocracy.

Corporate donations in any form completely undermine democracy by encouraging the two major parties to serve the interests of the donors rather than the people. Donations reduce the system to a one-party state. Many countries have completely prohibited any kind of corporate donations.

Banning paid advertising would be an effective first step toward reducing the cost of campaigns. Advertising undermines democracy. Thirty second TV shots to manipulate voters is hardly a legitimate objective of a truly democratic process. More debates and town hall meetings are far more useful.

Lobbying should be completely banned. Lobbying is tantamount to giving corporations significant influence in decision-making and excluding everyone else. If the president of Halliburton's son (I realize he would have found a way out) had died in Iraq and wanted to meet with the president, he would be at the president's door as soon as he got there while on the other hand, Cindy Sheehan with half the nation behind her can't even get close. There are many methods for giving citizens access to decision-making so that every one has equal political power.

The conundrum is that those who benefit from a plutocracy are the ones who would have to change it. Since that will never happen the only alternative seems to be a mass popular uprising against the current system. Unfortunately, I don't see that happening too soon.

Not to be overly pessimestic, there is a third option. That would require activists to persevere and fight the good fight because one day, revolutionary changes will happen. It has been the same with all movements throughout history. Be patient!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Plutocracy Posted by: eggnog2464
» RE: Plutocracy Posted by: cyclone
» RE: Plutocracy Posted by: montana freeman
A novel idea
Posted by: Erin on Sep 13, 2005 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Halliburton, Bechtel. Fluor? How about putting all the local construction companies and local construction workers to work rebuilding their own cities? All the displaced citizens who now have no jobs and no homes are the ones who need the work and would take pride in having a hand in getting the area on its feet again. You might say, 'Well, if they have no homes left where would they stay while they work?' The same places that Halliburton, et al will house their employees, that's where.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A novel idea Posted by: jwg
» RE: A novel idea Posted by: Falang
» RE: A novel idea Posted by: Falang
» RE: A novel idea Posted by: LG
O'Reilly-Katrina & The Poor-use your own damn bootstraps-you can survive
Posted by: fedupamerican on Sep 13, 2005 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't normally watch FOX, except lastnite they had a couple of stories I wanted to hang around for...of course they told those last so I was captured for a whole hour! Hannity and O'Reilly are two of the most bullying, opinionated people I've ever heard, but I endured and was rewarded at the end with O'Reilly's Sermon on Surviving Catastrophes, so to speak.

Just some of his ideology - "educating" kids

"... teachers should then tell the students that the local, state and federal government bureaucracies failed to protect those poor people... Let the kids see the poor in New Orleans and the suffering they endured. Then prod the children to connect the dots and wise up. Educate yourself, work hard, and be honest. Then when disaster occurs you will have a fighting chance to beat it."
-- Umm, let me think here... so everyone that attends school, gets an "Adequate" education (the minimum required here in MS) can live in a nice home in a nice neighborhood--perhaps a 'gated' one--and drive an SUV out of said area whenever a hurricane or other disaster is upon them....hmmm, must be more well-paying jobs and living wage jobs out there than I thought!!


"It is no accident that millions of poor people from all over the world sneak into America because they can make money here if they work hard."
-- Sooo, IF they WORK HARD- ugh, let's see, how many hours would they have to work at 5.15 an hour to pay a slumlord to have a roof over their head--around 600.00 a mo. is pretty cheap these days....do the math...

What planet is O from?????? Doesn't Halliburton, etc. etc. get Government "AID?" And don't Politicians get "AID?" What's the damn difference except in the AMOUNTS of aid to Corporations/Politicians vs. The Poor!!

http://www.billoreilly.com/site/product?printerFriendly
=true&pid=19095&said=null&satype=null

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush is no aberration - he's über American!
Posted by: philame on Sep 13, 2005 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you Pizzo for confirming something I have been thinking through the whole blame-game in the aftermath of Katrina. Bush does have a role to play, but he didn't create the demise of our country he only hastened it! We've been heading down the toilet for quite sometime and it's nobody's fault but our own. Bush is bad not because is an aberration, but becuase he represents everything that is wrong with us rolled up in one person. Glad to hear I am not the only person seeing this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We can beat it.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Sep 13, 2005 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Pizzo has stated the problem clearly.
Join the revolution

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can you spell "imminent domain?"
Posted by: bornxeyed on Sep 13, 2005 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can, but obviously you can't and neither can your editors. It's Eminent Domain.

Or was this a joke? If it was, I don't get it.

Nice article though, it's the very reason I think rescue and containment efforts were delayed. Can't make billions rebuilding a city that wasn't destroyed.

Welcome to Amerika - a Disney(c) Corporation

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Can you spell "imminent domain?" Posted by: simplisticton
mykie
Posted by: sam401 on Sep 13, 2005 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grover Norquist wrote to the labor Secrrtary on September 2 asking that Davis- Bacon be suspended for workers rebuilding the hurricane damaged areas. So, "to save the taxpayers money" prevailing wages now will not have to be paid. In Louisiana prevailing hourly wage is about $22.00 for an electrician and $11.00 for a painter. Workers trying to rebuild their homes and lives sure could use the money they're all willing to work hard for. The president acted quickly to accomodate Mr. Norquist and the taxpayers will be paying for generations to come for the billions that go to the usual suspects without much accountability.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Incompetence Pays
Posted by: plunger on Sep 13, 2005 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Disaster Capitalism in New Orleans

The cost of cleaning up the results of Bush's negligence in failing to deal with global warming and spending money needed for New Orleans levees on his war in Iraq may be as much as the $300 billion spent in four years to fight the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Of course, what most people would regard as a cost, the entrepreneurial politicians in the Bush White House see as yet another opportunity to transfer money from taxpayers to their personal friends. The scheme is blatantly obvious:

1. Bush has started to issue Iraq-style no-bid contracts, with cost-plus provisions that guarantee contractors a certain profit regardless of how much they spend.

2. Old buddies like Halliburton, Bechtel, and Fluor are first in line. Joe Allbaugh, the former director of FEMA, is lobbying for Halliburton, and another winner of the Katrina windfall, Shaw Group Inc.

3. In order to increase profitability at the expense of the working people most affected by the hurricane and thus most in need of money, Bush has removed (or here) federal minimum-wage provisions from the reconstruction contracts.

"Last summer, in the lull of the August media doze, the Bush Administration's doctrine of preventive war took a major leap forward. On August 5, 2004, the White House created the Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization, headed by former US Ambassador to Ukraine Carlos Pascual. Its mandate is to draw up elaborate 'post-conflict' plans for up to twenty-five countries that are not, as of yet, in conflict. According to Pascual, it will also be able to coordinate three full-scale reconstruction operations in different countries 'at the same time,' each lasting 'five to seven years.'

"But if the reconstruction industry is stunningly inept at rebuilding, that may be because rebuilding is not its primary purpose. According to Guttal, 'It's not reconstruction at all - it's about reshaping everything.' If anything, the stories of corruption and incompetence serve to mask this deeper scandal: the rise of a predatory form of disaster capitalism that uses the desperation and fear created by catastrophe to engage in radical social and economic engineering.

Competence just leads to fewer chances to make money.

http://xymphora.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We Are All to Blame
Posted by: davidt on Sep 13, 2005 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Steve points out both parties are complicit in the political morass we find ourselves in, however, even though it has been going on for quite some time the beginning of the end came when BushInc was allowed to steal the first election with very little reaction from a democracy-starved nation.

I remember Linda Worthheimer or NPR interviewing James Baker III down in Florida and allowing him to get away with the reply "I am just a concerned citizen" when she inquired as to what he was doing down in Florida.

What he was doing was arranging for harassment squads to stage near riots outside the centers that were performing recounts so as to hasten their "work" to preserve the democracy. Who else was down there monitoring? Why Tom DeLay, Christie Whitman, who as governor of NJ had a rep as a "kneecapper", and various other thugs.

What is Baker doing now? He is defending the Saudi government in a 1 billion dollar lawsuit brought by the Families of 9/11 Victims against the Saudi royal family. Now, that is what I call a patriotic American!

It seems those pesky families were not satisfied that the Saudi royalty were not investigated fully PRIOR to their being whisked away back home while all other flights in the country were grounded.

Since Black Florida voters bore the brunt of the Jim Crow tactics to negate their legally cast votes they should have gotten organized, recruited others of all Races sympathetic to their cause and boycotted the post-season college bowl games.

Can you imagine the disaster of the post-season Profit Bowls without the presence of Florida teams? The media would have had to cover it, they would have lost billions!

But, since self-sacrifice is a forgotten technique in America things went back to normal. The games began and all was RIGHT with America.

This enabled BushInc to steal the next one by destroying votes in various states, shorting minority precincts of voting machines when polls predicted a record turnout and America allowing computer companies to fix the election by not requiring a paper trail. Incredibly, many conservative websites were screaming that Keryy was stealing the election, and they had many synchophants reinforcing this balderdash.

Consider where this country would be right now if there were no citizens who sacrificed themselves for the greater good?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RIGHT ON!!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Sep 13, 2005 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We ARE a nation of chumps. We SHOULD be screaming at the White House gates by the thousands every day; we should be lining up at our "representatives' " offices to lobby for impeaching our current corrupt leadership and for honest government; we should mercelessly remove anyone from office anyone who even appears to be dishonset, and ignore all the bullshit advertising they put out.

But we don't.

Because all of that takes a enormous amout of time: time to study the candidates by ferreting out accurate information from the mountains of trash-talk they try (successfully) to bamboozle us with; time away from our jobs that we work at 50-60 or more hours a week to try to survive in this most unequal of economies; time away from our families, who need us.

These bastards know that modern life, which has in fact robbed us of "leisure" time and given us an entertainment/"news"/distraction media as seductive as cocaine (and about as useful), leaves us precious little energy to understand how our nation is being taken from us. Add to that an educational system that deliberately doesn't really educate ("creative intelligence," anyone?) most of the population, especially about the workings of democracy, and it becomes obvious why we're in the mess we're in.

This is what the current crop of fascists in Washington are counting on, and it is working beautifully. Untill recently, the only negative side effect was an unskilled labor force, but our government's corporate benefactors fixed that –– by outsourcing. Hell, the way we're going, we might as well outsource our government as well; could that be any worse that what we have now?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IGHT ON!! Posted by: Falang
We are beneath contempt....
Posted by: woodford54 on Sep 13, 2005 8:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You've got that one right. It's our country, too. If we allow this to go on we deserve whatever is in store for us. Either wake-up and act NOW or suffer (forever) the consequences. How long does it take to make that choice???????????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let the white boys have their city....
Posted by: bettsoff on Sep 13, 2005 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By all accounts it's going to be a toxic mess for decades to come. The tone of the article is right, calling out the corporados is right, but please...you couldn't pay me enough to live there now, and anyone with a lick of sense is going to treasure their FEMA trailer instead of clamoring to be let back into that cancer cesspool.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And
Posted by: cyclone on Sep 13, 2005 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is any one actually shocked by this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And Posted by: Justwayne
» No Posted by: Olympiada
More articles like this...
Posted by: JohnnyM on Sep 13, 2005 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously you have touched a nerve with the few commentors here...that's great! We need more of this, and yes, we do need to storm the white house and take back America. They did it in the 60's about the Vietnam war, so why aren't we?

There's an illegal war going on now, that the white house has perpetrated in order to tell the rest of the world we don't care about the UN and the new rules are our rules. There's obvious disconcern for America's poor. There are neo-cons, ultra-nationalists and mis-interpreting chrisitians running America and their view of the world is so distorted and self-serving it's sickening!

Meet you at the white house - You bring the BBQ & hotdogs, I'll bring the WPD (weapons of political destruction).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now What - once again
Posted by: thehousedog on Sep 13, 2005 12:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always enjoy reading articles and opinions like this, but the leave me cold. The next logical question is, "now what are we going to do about it."

Anybody? What are we going to do about it?

I thought so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Now What - once again Posted by: Falang
The United States of Halliburton
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Sep 13, 2005 2:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is instructive to see the depths to which the Bushies will stoop to protect their corporate interests.

Just two weeks ago the Muse was writing about a different but same outrage in:

The United States of Halliburton

Over the weekend (when the Bush Administration is at its most nefarious because most of America is preoccupied with getting drunk at barbeques or running from hurricanes), the Pentagon demoted the Army contracting official who criticized massive, noncompetitive contracts that Halliburton received for the reconstruction of Iraq.

The move demonstrates, to paraphrase the Administration’s tired mantra on fighting terror, that “we will move heaven and earth to find a low-level minion to blame for every gargantuan screw-up we commit.”

...After all, Halliburton hasn’t been so bad. To date, there have been just a few glancing blows against its performance. The Pentagon Inspector General concluded that its record keeping was so bad they couldn’t even determine whether contractual obligations were fulfilled. The Defense Department’s criminal unit is investigating its activities. The FBI is checking whether Halliburton’s KBR subsidiary illegally received military contracts and the GAO has found “multiple” contract abuses...

Full article

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same old. same old. indeed
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 13, 2005 5:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow!
That was a great piece of writing. The best thing that I have read, in so short a space, yet.
Fantastic and bravo! I have nothing to add. That piece said it all.
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Great, get the rebuilding contracts ready.
Posted by: Olympiada on Sep 13, 2005 8:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am trying a new approach from here on out. Skimming all the comments before adding my own.

Thanks for bornxeyed for duking it out with me. May you be blessed.

I like the wit in this article. Lord, the situation down here is mighty corrupt, mighty corrupt. But as someone said, are you really shocked? No.

My father was liberal. He taught me all this.

Do I feel powerless? You know what I think would work? This is real twisted. Radical hotties: Use your sex appeal. Oh yes, we could sneak into the White House, into the inner circle, with our sex appeal, and then when we really had the politicians attention, seduce them and implant in our logic in their minds. Think it would work?

Sorry, that is the only way I see to affect change in this corrupt country. Join the corruption. Sell your soul to the devil.

That is how I feel after reading this article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

preemptive ok?
Posted by: gltirebiter on Sep 14, 2005 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
now we hear that the pentagon is preparing to enable military commanders to strike preemptively with nuclear weapons and that jeb bush is firing up his presidential election committee.
we need to get to the barricades, although i fear it is over already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same old same old
Posted by: Gunner on Sep 15, 2005 4:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article really hit the spot. I'm up for some revolution, I just hope it happens in my time and not a hundred years from now. ;P


They got the guns but, we've got the numbers. - Jim Morrison

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Shaw Group, Inc.
Posted by: billfaster on Sep 30, 2005 12:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, there are only a handful of companies in the world that possess the capabilities necessary to rebuild a country's infrastructure. Second, it's quite humorous that everyone fails to mention that one of the largest no-bid Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contracts was awarded to the Shaw Group, Inc. which happens to be headed by the recently resigned Chairman of the Louisiana Democratic Party. J. M. Bernhard, Jr. is a close friend, or crony as you like to call it, of Governor Blanco (The Shaw Group's corporate jet was made available to Governor Blanco on numerous occasions), a frequent contributor to the democratic party, and was co-chairman of the governor's transition team. While the mainstream press only aims their focus on Halliburton, the Shaw Group continues to go unnoticed. Why do you think this is???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]