Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Racism or Relief?

By Malkia A. Cyril, AlterNet. Posted September 8, 2005.


It's time to focus scarce relief resources on saving the lives of Katrina survivors rather than protecting property from alleged "looters."

It seems that Katrina has not only uprooted homes and trees, but also uncovered the stark truth about race in America. Racial injustice in New Orleans is on fire. Federal incompetence is fueling the inferno. And the news coverage of Katrina is fanning the flames.

Katrina has been called a disaster of biblical proportions. And it is. But the disaster is not confined to weather. The loss of life is being compounded by the frightening political decision to withhold rescue services from survivors and instead focus on "fighting crime."

Over one million people with the means to leave fled before the storm, but nearly 150,000 were left behind, trapped by poverty and neglected by disaster plans. Those who got out were mostly affluent and white. Those left behind were not. They represented the poorest 15-20 percent of New Orleans' population and were predominately black. This is not simply the result of a natural disaster. This is the consequence of human decisions about who deserves to live and who should be left to die.

Emergency systems and disaster protocol must put life above law. And yet, when it comes to the lives of blacks and poor people in the aftermath of Katrina, "looting" is the leading headline.

President Bush has declared "zero tolerance" and pledged more troops to police the area. Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco has prioritized "law and order" over search and rescue. Exacting punishment instead of providing for basic needs is compounded by this disaster and the inhumanity of policies guided by this belief are laid bare. Black and poor residents of New Orleans are paying for this decision with their lives.

While the decision to arrest people for trying to survive seems misplaced, it could have something to do with the news coverage of Katrina. It has been saturated with descriptions of blacks chest-deep in water "looting" food, while referring to whites in virtually the same circumstances as survivors "finding" food.

Or perhaps it is because news stories of structural racism in the relief effort are few and far between. And almost none have raised critical life-and-death questions about how the evacuation process, search and rescue operations, relief distribution, law enforcement decisions and disaster policy are being determined by race.

Where were the resources and political will that would have prevented this tragedy from reaching such deadly proportions? In the aftermath of this devastating natural disaster, how can the media expose the racism in the relief efforts and help to prevent the man-made disaster at hand? Even CBS reported that in one neighborhood the police helped homeless survivors carry stolen supplies from Walmart to another area that had been hit harder.

Across the country concerned communities are demanding that the arrests for so-called "looting" should cease and search and rescue efforts should continue unhindered, that all resources should be used to evacuate survivors immediately, and that people should be provided with clean water and food. Obviously, everyone doesn't agree that your race and your income should determine whether you survive the storm.

Digg!

Malkia A. Cyril is director of Oakland-based Youth Media Council.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Hurricane Katrina! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Structural racism
Posted by: Olympiada on Sep 8, 2005 5:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Powerful phrase there.

It is hard to believe how backwards Louisiana is to us folks in the Bay Area. And way I say this I mean their priorities, the law enforcement priorities that is.

I would like to think if something like this happened in the Bay Area, we would be a little more enlightened as to our priorities. But perhaps that is elitist pride. Perhaps we would do no better.

This is the 21st century, and racism has gone nowhere. We can not say we are free of it until our whole country is free of it. We have a lot of work to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

racism
Posted by: twinspeak on Sep 8, 2005 6:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
no, we are not free of racism. how sad. However I was glued to cnn, bbc news, and reuters news and saw many accounts
of the so called "looting". When basic neccesities were being taken, the media showed both black and white looking for essentials. When TVs and Nikes were being taken, both Black and White were called looters. The media fairly represented both issues in this case. Anything else is inflamatory rumor.
As to the governments achingly slow response. Red tape, beurocracy, and incompetence caused this. Not racism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: racism Posted by: nycpearl
» RE: racism Posted by: nickptar
» RE: racism Posted by: perkinsc3595
It's all in the phrasing
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Sep 15, 2005 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Looters" or "finders"? Refugees or evacuees? Who knows what to call the scattered population from New Orleans. Some have said they're not refugees, because they are Americans; and they should be called evacuees.
I think Americans have it wrong. Refugee is the right term here.
For too long the nation's poor have been kept out of the socioeconomic spotlight, shoved to the margin, forced to eke out a bare existence in ghettos and skid rows. They are the people who aren't shown on prime-time TV who aren't featured in glossy magazines who aren't given tax breaks or write checks for campaign contributions.
The voyage from slave ships to the Superdome is merely a blip in time.
These people are a portrait of Exiles in America- a people without a home, having to take refuge in distant and foreign cities to face an eerie fate, just like refugees elsewhere. It's scary.
America is not as homogenous as we think. It may have the same language, but for the poor it might as well be another country. Rich and poor cannot exist together here unless the system changes. New Orleans is living proof.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]