Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Welcome to the 'Third World,' America

By Sarita Sarvate, Pacific News Service. Posted September 12, 2005.


Katrina may help raise American consciousness about the 'Third World' that lies within its boundaries.
Advertisement

When I first came here from India nearly 30 years ago, Americans often asked me about floods, droughts and epidemics in my native country. The patronizing tone of these queries betrayed most Americans' simple belief that "It could never happen here." We immigrants too seemed to implicitly believe this dictum.

Recent images from New Orleans prove that it can happen here.

Trying to explain to Americans why so many thousands perished in natural calamities so often in India, I would feel ashamed of the poverty, the deprivation, the enormous gap between the haves and the have-nots in my native country. I would talk about the lack of modern technology and infrastructure, of social organization, of resources necessary to launch rescue and recovery operations. But my audience would become skeptical, asking me questions as to whether the caste system prescribed in the Hindu religion was the real reason behind our social and political apathy toward the victims.

Ironically, America's response to the predicament and suffering of Katrina's victims has been eerily reminiscent of that of a Third World country.

You only have to look at the faces of the victims to understand why they haven't been instantly helicoptered to dry ground, why they were allowed to languish like animals in a crowded Superdome with no sanitation, water, or food, why there has been no outpouring of offers from concerned citizens to host them in their homes.

I remember sitting in the dining hall at the International House in Berkeley, Calif., in the winter of 1977, listening to my fellow Indian students marveling at the way in which America was coping with the extreme freeze in the Midwest that year. "The remarkable thing is that the system works here. It doesn't fail, like it does in India," one friend said. We all wondered then how or why the systems didn't fail here.

"Because people care for one another," one student ventured.

That was 28 years ago. Since then, a lot has changed around the world. Now, in the wake of the Katrina disaster, Americans have seen that the system can fail here. What is worse, they have seen what can happen to human beings when they are deprived of the very basic necessities of life, when they are driven to desperation, when they are left without help, to starve, ail, succumb and die.

In the meantime, countries of the so-called "Third World" have learned to take better care of their citizens, as was demonstrated in India's response to the recent tsunami. Today, the underclass in India has a loud enough voice that the kind of neglect of the victims that has been seen on the images broadcast from New Orleans would create political and social furor in my home country. Many poor people in India today have higher expectations of life, of society, of the political system, which they now know is supposed to serve them. Ironically, it is American TV that may have fashioned these expectations.

Much has changed in America too in the last 30 years. Lack of health care, increasing poverty, and institutionalized disparity between the rich and the poor have made Americans indifferent to social suffering and inequity. The nation's infrastructure has deteriorated, a result of misplaced priorities.

Over time, the "First World" has merged with the "Third World."

Of course, immigrants like me have always been aware of the "caste system" in America. Though I was a Brahmin in India, upon arrival in this country I felt part of the margins of society. But Hurricane Katrina really brought home to me the heartbreaking fact that the poor of the world happen to be "untouchables" regardless of whether they live in America or India.

During the last few days, I have been haunted by the images of those suffering and drowning in a deluged city. If there is one useful purpose that this monumental tragedy can serve, it would be to raise American consciousness about the "Third World" nation that lies within its boundaries. If America is to claim moral superiority in imposing its high ideals of freedom and democracy around the world, it needs to first serve its own "have-nots," not only in this disaster, but for the long term.

Digg!

Sarita Sarvate (naladamayanti@yahoo.com) is a physicist and a writer for India Currents and other publications.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Hurricane Katrina! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A Great piece!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 12, 2005 3:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The government's response (or, if you will, lack thereof) to the devistating effects of Hurricane Katrina last week is final proof - as if any were needed - that the ill-conceived, disasterous experiment of trying to decrease the size of the federal government has been, politely put, a dismal failure. During the first two days of the crisis, no one on any level, federal or state, seemed to know what was truly happening let alone what to do. This should have come as a surprise to no one. If by now you are not aware of the fact that George W. Bush and the dirty old dingbats that comprise his administration are the most corrupt, inept, dispicable cabal ever to occupy the oval office, you havn't been paying attention.
Compassionate conservatism, indeed.
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Lo and Behold!!! Posted by: al fiori
» Smaller Government Posted by: Ashington
gregory chamberlin
Posted by: Greg on Sep 12, 2005 4:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Compassionate conservatism, as has been illustrated, means compassion for conservatives...and screw everyone else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

marquita
Posted by: marquitahill on Sep 12, 2005 4:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Languish like animals" is a term Ms. Sarvate used. Other people use terms such as "treated worse than animals." WHY is it OK to treat animals worse than people? If people were more respectful of our fellow creatures maybe we would be more respectful of fellow humans too. Maybe no one would be left to "languish."
TIME TO CHANGE OUR ATTITUDES AND OUR LANGUAGE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: marquita Posted by: Basenjis
please keep the story straight
Posted by: reugen on Sep 12, 2005 4:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have received gushing emails from Move On and other organizations about how great the response was to people across america opening their doors to Katrina victims. There have been delight stories of personal actions n taken by private organizations and reasonably wealthy persons who, in the face of clear public official inaction, took action to help. What about Sean Penn's personal intervention? Fundraisers?

There might be class differences in america but people still share the same core values and all pretty much respect the right to the pursuit of happiness here. We just don't agree on how to execute them. Same story around the globe.

To say americans don't care is flat wrong. To suggest there's a third world within our country is liberal pap. Why did Dean fade? Why couldn't Kerry or Gore beat a reasonably weak candidate while advocating pro-government positions? Aside from the fact that they were both inferior politicians, americans voted for the ownership society. And will continue to do so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: please keep the story straight Posted by: mothersmovement
» RE: please keep the story straight Posted by: Revolutionary
difference in leadership
Posted by: jaggurnaut on Sep 12, 2005 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On july 26th there was a massive flood in Mumbai, the commercial capital of India with 37 cm rain falling in 24 hours. Half the city was underwater and due to lack of good prediction technologies about 200,000 people were struck for 2 days in offices, buses and trains. While a number of people died (mostly poor people), there are otehr stories of courage and rescue with normal people becoming heros.

The limited emergency machinery available to the inidan govt was put into use within 24 hours (thats a very good response time for india) and there were army units in the city within 24 hours. Even though Indian politics is riddled with corruption, massive factionism and other evils, all we have seen from indian govt. and the local govt. is out pouring of help.

I feel the difference lies in the people in the highest offices of teh country. The president of India has a PhD and worked in the Indian space program. The president of US was a drunk who found god. In india we have no such thing as faith-based and with the current president we are moving towards science more faster than in recent years. I wouldnt be surprised if the money to fix the levees went to some church that denounce gay marriage.

The person in the highest office is always responsible be it for waking up late for a disaster, killing thousands in a faulty war, underfunding sound science for faith based philosophy and any number of things that the readers of this site are familiar with.

No leader in a third world country can get away with lying or starting a baseless war, but I guess the first world leaders have been doing that for years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: difference in leadership Posted by: NDnative
Mumbai Vs New Orleans
Posted by: mumbai on Sep 12, 2005 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
inches of rain in new orleans due to hurricane katrina... 18
inches of rain in mumbai (July 27th).... 37.1

population of new orleans... 484,674
population of mumbai.... 12,622,500

deaths in new orleans within 48 hours of katrina...100
deaths in mumbai within 48hours of rain.. 37.

number of people to be evacuated in new orleans... entire city..wohh
number of people evacuated in mumbai...10,000

Cases of shooting and violence in new orleans...Countless
Cases of shooting and violence in mumbai.. NONE

Time taken for US army to reach new orleans... 48hours
Time taken for Indian army and navy to reach mumbai...12hours

status 48hours later...new orleans is still waiting for relief, army and electricty
status 48hours later..mumbai is back on its feet and is business is as usual

USA...world's most developed nation
India...third world country..

Ooopss...did i get the last fact wrong???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mumbai Vs New Orleans Posted by: notrace
» RE: Mumbai Vs New Orleans Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Mumbai Vs New Orleans Posted by: jaggurnaut
Starve the Beasters
Posted by: davidt on Sep 12, 2005 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Welcome to ethnic cleansing American Style.

The culprits call themselves the Starve The Beasters. What beast are they talking about, why the programs meant to help CITIZENS in their time of need.

Their "government" is meant to do one thing--preserve wealth & privilege for those who have it and make sure that "undesirables" get only the crumbs left over.

This is Reaganomics II. He as much as said that poor people are poor because they deserve to be poor on many an occasion. Then shrugged and said nothing we can do about it.

BushInc has something he can do about it--let them die in wars, toxic soups that curiously never are found at the habitues of the wealthy. Funny huh? Mother Bush chuckled.

The Reaganomaniacs have gotten what they wanted--keep "them" shackled with poor education, no college access but plenty of minimum-wage jobs that don't provide any benefits.

To the bird who mentions liberal pap. Here is a load of conservative crap for him to smell:

Exxon-Mobil, Chevron, Texaco & BP have to date extracted 100 billlion dollars of profits from the state of Louisiana & the surrounding Gulf States. Louisiana, Mississippi & Alabama are the poorest states in the Union. Louisiana has a Democratic Governor, that I am sure will have to fend off GOP attack dogs that will be blaming her for Katrina. The other two have Republican governors.

How do those poor blacks get their fair share of the profits that, I am sure, were used as an enticement to allow those smelly oil companies to extract the oil from Louisiana in the first place?

Oh I know arrive en masse at the oil company HQs and be shot down and be labeled "rioters".

Or the alternative, scratch around for a meager slave exixtence--no SUV's, no mansions but plenty of noxious effluvia that the rich don't have to smell. Then they can be described as "underprivileged" but content with their lot.

The real ironic twist in this whole mess is that our "liberal papster" has been screwed just as bad by the birds that he defends. Or, if he hasn't yet he soon will be--somebody has to pay for Katrina. Geewhizzums.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pap smeared Posted by: reugen
A Link that shows how bad it really is in NO
Posted by: cyclone on Sep 12, 2005 12:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://news.independent.co.uk
/world/americas/article311818.ece

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember Times Beach!
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Sep 12, 2005 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will New Orleans and other areas around the Gulf of Mexico become inhabitable again? How will the area be cleansed of industrial and human waste which permeates the environment?
After the water recedes, we won't know the scope of the damage the toxins and poisons left behind that left the landscape nearly void.
In the eighties a Missouri town called Times Beach was evacuated because dioxin was found in the soil, and as a result the city never came back.
The challenge to rebuilding the Gulf Coast is to scour the region of the deadly chemicals and enable those who lost everything to have a chance to live in the same neighborhoods before the storm hit.
But do they want to return to a dead city? Or will their homes be sold to a developer, since many residents didn't have flood insurance?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have always known about the third world conditions in America
Posted by: Olympiada on Sep 12, 2005 10:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I learned about them in high school.

Thank you for summing up the last 30 years. That meant a lot to me. I have no control over what happened over the last 30 years. I only hope the next 30 years do not keep moving in the same direction, although I fear they will.

It sounds like your country is far more civilized than our country.

I am not proud to be an American. My father is not proud to be an American.

That is the truth.

But, I have been told I must appreciate it. Citizenship is not something to take for granted. Oh, to be a citizen of a country I am not proud of. What pain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great Countries Demand Great Governments
Posted by: franco on Sep 12, 2005 11:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Government has the sole responsibilty in maintaining the safety net infrastructure for the underclass.

Churches do not build roads. Churches can not have rescue helicopters. And there are not that many pastors who can perform surgeries. Faith based spending is only an aversion.

When Pres. Clinton said the era of big government is over, he might have been thinking of a more efficient government still keeping the big scary bussiness' under control...

The people in this administration may be quite incompetent or they are competent mercenaries of the big bussiness'.

What one can see since the neo-cons have taken over, is a steady proccess in dismantling US government power in management, finance and military.

Outsourcing management and control is the basic tenet of the neo-republican party. Because Big bussiness does NOT tolerate standards set by people government interferences..

This administration represents big bussiness that its growth has nothing to do with well being of the average americans. They will prosper with cheap labor, low quality of life, no freedom and no accountability.

This great land needs a great administration...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Third World Start up?
Posted by: Scott on Sep 17, 2005 12:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is wrong with letting all the people hit by Katrina, letting them return to their house or bldg's or whatever and taking a few boards, sheets of tin, tarps, etc. and building them a place to stay on their former house site or bldg. site? What is wrong with letting them return to conditions like most of the third world lives in on a daily basis, and let's see if these "modern" Americans can use their bootstraps to raise themselves and their families up the ladder!! What is wrong with letting them do it and not WE the People? MIGHT make for a better future generation or two!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]