Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Politics Driving Mississippi's ICE Raid

By David Bacon, New America Media. Posted September 2, 2008.


A major raid in Mississippi had a political agenda -- to undermine a growing coalition threatening the state's conservative establishment.
Advertisement

LAUREL, Miss. -- On August 25, immigration agents swooped down on Howard Industries, a Mississippi electrical equipment factory, taking 481 workers to a privately-run detention center in Jena, Louisiana. Some 106 were also arrested at the plant, and released wearing electronic monitoring devices on their ankles, if they had children, or without them, if they were pregnant. Eight workers were taken to Federal court in Hattiesburg, where they were charged with aggravated identity theft.

Afterwards Barbara Gonzalez, spokesperson for the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), stated the raid took place because of a tip by a "union member" two years before. Other media accounts focused on an incident in which plant workers allegedly cheered as their coworkers were led away by ICE agents. The articles claim the plant was torn by tension between immigrant and non-immigrant workers, and that unions in Mississippi are hostile to immigrants.

Many Mississippi activists and workers, however, charge the raid had a political agenda -- undermining a growing political coalition that threatens the state's conservative Republican establishment. They also say the raid, which took place during union contract negotiations, will help the company resist demands for better wages and conditions.

Jim Evans, a national AFL-CIO staff member in Mississippi and a leading member of the state legislature's Black Caucus, said he believed "this raid is an effort to drive immigrants out of Mississippi. It is also an attempt to drive a wedge between immigrants, African Americans, white people and unions -- all those who want political change here." Patricia Ice, attorney for the Mississippi Immigrant Rights Alliance (MIRA), agreed that "this is political. They want a mass exodus of immigrants out of the state, the kind we've seen in Arizona and Oklahoma. The political establishment here is threatened by Mississippi's changing demographics, and what the electorate might look like in 20 years."

In the last two decades, the percentage of African Americans in the state's population has increased to over 35%, and immigrants, who were statistically insignificant until recently, are expected to reach 10% in the next decade. Mississippi union membership has been among the nation's lowest, but since the early 1980s, workers have joined unions in catfish and poultry plants, casinos and shipyards, along with those at Howard Industries.

Evans, other members of the Black Caucus, many of the state's labor organizations, and immigrant communities all see shifting demographics as the basis for changing the state's politics. Over the last seven years their growing coalition has proposed legislation to set up a Department of Labor (Mississippi is the only state without one), guarantee access to education for children of all races and nationalities, and provide drivers' licenses to immigrants. MIRA organized support in the state capitol for those proposals and Evans, who sponsored many of them, chairs the MIRA's board.

Earlier this year, however, the legislature passed, and Governor Haley Barbour signed, a law making it a state felony for an undocumented worker to hold a job, punishable by 1-5 years in prison and $1,000-10,000 in fines. Employers are given immunity for employing workers without papers, so long as they vet new hires through an ICE database called E-Verify. It is still not known whether the people arrested at Howard Industries will be charged under the new state law. Evans says the law and the raid serve the same objectives. "They both just make it easier to exploit workers. The people who profit from Mississippi's low wage system want to keep it the way it is," he alleged.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: conservatives, immigration rights, immigratin raid, howard industries

David Bacon is the author of several books, the most recent of which is Illegal People: How Globalization Creates Migration and Criminalizes Immigrants.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Immigration! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
what a logical law!
Posted by: MdeG on Sep 3, 2008 9:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm staggered by the logical brilliance of the new Missouri "law making it a state felony for an undocumented worker to hold a job, punishable by 1-5 years in prison and $1,000-10,000 in fines."

OK, so if an undocumented worker is breaking the law by working, they're to be jailed (at state expense) for up to 5 years. How does this help the state's budget please?

Unauthorized workers are also to pay up to $10,000 in fines. How does the state imagine it's going to collect such a sum from people who are widely blamed for degrading pay standards (i.e. accepting sub-minimum wages?)

This raid is very clearly part of a wider union-busting plan.

Really sad that workers fall into the trap of being set against each other by their bosses. Rather than competing with each other, why not organize? I think IBEW was doing the right thing. Organizing undercuts' management's perverse incentive to prefer undocumented labor.

Most of the "illegals" are in fact economic refugees, shaken lose from their countries of origin by free trade agreements. The great majority did not come here to harm anyone. I can't blame people for wanting to be able to live and work. Understanding and solidarity will get us a lot further than raids.

And as for that lamebrained law -- Never mind. I'm not going to use that kind of language.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Your sarcasm is well taken. Posted by: JakobFabian01
A wonderful example:
Posted by: rickiey on Sep 3, 2008 10:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jim Evans, a national AFL-CIO staff member in Mississippi and a leading member of the state legislature's Black Caucus, said he believed "this raid is an effort to drive immigrants out of Mississippi. It is also an attempt to drive a wedge between immigrants, African Americans, white people and unions -- all those who want political change here."

This is a wonderful example of unions not doing what they were designed to do: Protect the workers themselves.

The common union member does not want illegal immigrants to work in the U.S. There is, of course, no objection to immigrant citizens, nor should there be.

But the Union leaders do not represent that interest, because of their own political ambitions.

Regardless of where you stand on the immigration debate, it is the responsibility of union leaders to reflect the views of the union members, not their own political expediency, no matter how progressive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Nice censor job on the TRUTH, Alternet!
Posted by: republicanwriter on Sep 11, 2008 10:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unions lift all boats and provide protection for ALL workers.

There is no logic in believing a Union could be effective in an operation where 90% of the workers are non-union or "undocumented". Ignoring that population puts the workers in peril as it did in this situation. Lack of solidarity ended up shutting down this plant. It hurt everyone not just the undocumented workers.

This article reports the trend of Owners and management collude to create a tension and distrust between all workers. If they are not successful they "cooperate" with ICE. Then they prevail in busting labor movements with assistance from the government. Quite perverse on the face of it.

One need only look to Postville to see the result. American workers did not get those Agriprocessor's jobs. Who did? A diverse mix of immigrants from a handful of different countries with no common language and no community support system is now working at that plant.

Managment prevailed at busting the Union effort.
Your strategy is doomed to failure and its already played itself out in several other plants and more to come.

If Bush/Cheny Co. keeps it up by the time they leave office they might shut down all manufacturing in the US via harrassment of the workers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unions should be representing U.S. workers
Posted by: mygirlboo on Sep 9, 2008 12:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I regard our borders and shores as union picket lines protecting the U.S. workers from the onslaught of illegal workers who will work for less. These illegals are nothing more than scabs, who sneak in, get a job that supports one person at best, then sneak in a wife and several children, then proceed to breed more and more and more. It infuriates me that they then think they should be unionized, protected and provided for, with benefits and all the perks of a U.S. citizen. They care nothing about the American people whose jobs they take, schools they pack, health care and welfare resources they drain. It is not the duty of the American people to foot the bill for the health, education and welfare of Mexicans. That is the duty of their glorious Mexican government who love to preen and prance, bragging and boasting about how they are full and equal partners with the U.S.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unions should be representing U.S. workers
Posted by: mygirlboo on Sep 9, 2008 12:20 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I regard our borders and shores as union picket lines protecting the U.S. workers from the onslaught of illegal workers who will work for less. These illegals are nothing more than scabs, who sneak in, get a job that supports one person at best, then sneak in a wife and several children, then proceed to breed more and more and more. It infuriates me that they then think they should be unionized, protected and provided for, with benefits and all the perks of a U.S. citizen. They care nothing about the American people whose jobs they take, schools they pack, health care and welfare resources they drain. It is not the duty of the American people to foot the bill for the health, education and welfare of Mexicans. That is the duty of their glorious Mexican government who love to preen and prance, bragging and boasting about how they are full and equal partners with the U.S.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Identity Fabrication: A Victimless Crime
Posted by: JakobFabian01 on Sep 9, 2008 1:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Eight workers were taken to Federal court in Hattiesburg, where they were charged with aggravated identity theft."

Note that out of hundreds of workers arrested, only eight were actually charged with a crime. And what was this crime? "Identity theft."

My guess, which I believe can be verified, is that some illegal immigrants write just any old number on documents where a Social Security Number is called for, and that a few of these numbers, purely by accident, match those of US citizens.

This is not "identity theft." This is identity fabrication. It is a crime without a recognizable victim.

What happens when an illegal immigrant writes a US citizen's Social Security Number on a document in order to be allowed to work? The first thing that happens is that the immigrant worker's payroll taxes are credited to this US citizen. Imagine: a "theft" in which the thief unlawfully pays somebody else's taxes!

The government should do something better with our money than prosecute victimless crimes.

How about this: Enforce the minimum wage! Re-negotiate trade agreements (NAFTA, the WTO, and their progeny) with workers in mind, not only investors! Roll back union-busting laws!

Stop breaking up immigrant families!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its the numbers stupid
Posted by: Paul1939 on Sep 9, 2008 5:12 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Jim Evans, a national AFL-CIO staff member in Mississippi and a leading member of the state legislature's Black Caucus, said he believed ‘this raid is an effort to drive immigrants out of Mississippi. It is also an attempt to drive a wedge between immigrants, African Americans, white people and unions -- all those who want political change here’."

Mr. Evans, driving illegal aliens out of Mississippi and the entire US should be the goal of every union official. Remember the union has a legal obligation to represent “union members.” Since Illegal aliens cannot legally work in the US, they cannot legally be union members. The flood of legal immigrants and illegal aliens has driven down US workers’ income at many income levels, not just middle and lower income levels. You cannot get around the reality that US workers’ interests are diametrically opposed to the interests of legal immigrants and illegal aliens. You could pass all the labor specific laws you want, and US workers would still be injured by legal immigrants and illegal aliens; unless of course you can repeal the law of supply and demand.

Legalize illegal aliens and increase the number of legal immigrants and you will have more legal workers chasing the same or fewer jobs which will inevitably lead to lower income and higher unemployment for US workers. Pass a living wage law, and the interests of US workers will still be diametrically opposed to those of legal immigrants and illegal alien interests. Both will still be chasing the same jobs, and employers will be able to demand more from the people they choose to hire.

Why on earth do you think the Chamber of Commerce and the wealthy elite are such strong supporters of open borders policies? Why did they demand huge increases in H1b and various other visas? Bill Gates even threatened Congress that he would move his company to Canada if Congress didn’t give him what he wanted. Why do they want to keep NAFTA, WTO and most favored trading status for China? Why do you think the Bush Administration wants a Western Hemisphere wide free trade zone?

These are all efforts to drive down the income of US workers as far as possible. We are beyond the point of being concerned with the tough conditions legal immigrants and illegal aliens face in their home country or how hard they work or what kind of life they are trying to create for their families. It is a choice between you and your family vice legal immigrants and illegal aliens! We cannot accomodate both.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

doe anyone have a copy of the Constitution
Posted by: republicanwriter on Sep 11, 2008 10:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't there something in there about it being self evident that all men are created equal?

Why the High Horse and since when did America turn soft and hand over control and decision making for business to the government?

Do you have a right as an employer to hire and contract labor with whom you choose, at the market rate?

Do you have a right as a Human Being to self sustenance?

If we are at or below replacement population where will the workers come from to sustain you whiney americans ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]